BILSTON CANAL ACT.

Envy, like a dark shadow, follows closely the footsteps of prosperity;

success in any undertaking, out of the circle of genius, produces a

rival.--This I have instanced in our hackney coaches.

Profits, like a round-bellied bottle, may seem bulky, which, like that,

will not bear dividing: Thus Orator Jones, in 1774, opened a debating

society at the Red Lion; he quickly filled a large room with customers,

and his pockets with money, but he had not prudence to keep either. His

success opened a rival society at the King's-head, which, in a few

weeks, annihilated both.

The growing profits of our canal company, already mentioned, had

increased the shares from 140_l_. in 1768, to 400 guineas, in 1782.

These emoluments being thought enormous, a rival company sprung up,

which, in 1783, petitioned Parliament to partake of those emoluments, by

opening a parallel cut from some of the neighbouring coal-pits; to

proceed along the lower level, and terminate in Digbeth.

A stranger might ask, "How the water in our upland country, which had

never supplied one canal, could supply two? Whether the second canal was

not likely to rob the first? Whether one able canal is not preferable to

two lame ones? If a man sells me an article cheaper than I can purchase

it elsewhere, whether it is of consequence to me what are his profits?

And whether two companies in rivalship would destroy that harmony which

has long subsisted in Birmingham."

The new company urged, "The necessity of another canal, lest the old

should not perform the business of the town; that twenty per cent. are

unreasonable returns; that they could afford coals under the present

price; that the south country teams would procure a readier supply from

Digbeth, than from the present wharf, and not passing through the

streets, would be prevented from injuring the pavement; and that the

goods from the Trent would come to their wharf by a run of eighteen

miles nearer than to the other."

The old company alledged, "That they ventured their property in an

uncertain pursuit, which, had it not succeeded, would have ruined many

individuals; therefore the present gains were only a recompense for

former hazard: that this property was expended upon the faith of

Parliament, who were obliged in honour to protect it, otherwise no man

would risk his fortune upon a public undertaking; for should they allow

a second canal, why not a third; which would become a wanton destruction

of right, without benefit; that although the profit of the original

subscribers might seem large, those subscribers are but few; many have

bought at a subsequent price, which barely pays common interest, and

this is all their support; therefore a reduction would be barbarous on

one side, and sensibly felt on the other: and, as the present canal

amply supplies the town and country, it would be ridiculous to cut away

good land to make another, which would ruin both."

I shall not examine the reasons of either, but leave the disinterested

reader to weigh both in his own balance.

When two opponents have said all that is true, they generally say

something more; rancour holds the place of argument.

Both parties beat up for volunteers in the town, to strengthen their

forces; from words of acrimony, they came to those of virulence; then

the powerful batteries of hand-bills, and news-papers were opened: every

town within fifty miles, interested, on either side, was moved to

petition, and both prepared for a grand attack, confident of victory.

Perhaps a contest among friends, in matters of property, will remove

that peace of mind, which twenty per cent. will not replace.

Each party possessed that activity of spirit, for which Birmingham is

famous, and seemed to divide between them the legislative strength of

the nation: every corner of the two houses was ransacked for a vote; the

throne was the only power unsolicited. Perhaps at the reading, when both

parties had marshalled their forces, there was the fullest House of

Commons ever remembered on a private bill.

The new company promised much, for besides the cut from Wednesbury to

Digbeth, they would open another to join the two canals of Stafford and

Coventry, in which a large track of country was interested.

As the old company were the first adventurers, the house gave them the

option to perform this Herculean labour, which they accepted.

As parliament have not yet given their determination, and as the printer

this moment raps at my door, "Sir, the press waits, more copy if you

please," I cannot stay to tell the world the result of the bill; but

perhaps, the new proprietors, by losing, will save 50,000_l_. and the

old, by winning, become sufferers.

An History of Birmingham (1783) · 第 151 / 155 题