ASTON.

Two miles north of Birmingham, is Aston (East-town) being east of

Westbury (Wednesbury) it lies on a steep descent towards the river Tame.

This place, like that of Erdington, belonged to the Earls of Mercia in

the Saxon times; and, at the conquest, was the property of the

unfortunate Edwin. Fitz-Ausculf became his successor in this, and in

other lands: the survey calls it eight hides, valued at 5_l_. per annum;

a mill, 3s. and a wood, three miles long, and half a mile broad. The

mill, I make no doubt, stood where a mill now stands, near

Sawford-bridge; but neither the hides, nor the wood, could be confined

within the boundary of Afton; the manor is too little for either. The

lordship extends about a square mile, and that part which is now the

park, I have reason to think, was then a common, and for ages after.

A Saxon, of the name of Godmund, held it under the Mercian Earls, and

found means, at the conquest, to hold it under the Norman.

One hundred yards north of the church, in a perfect swamp, stood the

hall; probably erected by Godmund, or his family: the situation shews

the extreme of bad taste--one would think, he endeavoured to lay his

house under the water. The trenches are obliterated by the floods, so as

to render the place unobserved by the stranger: it is difficult to chuse

a worse, except he had put his house under the earth. I believe there

never was more than one house erected on the spot, and that was one

too much.

Whether this Saxon family of Godmund became extinct, or had lost their

right, is uncertain; but Sumeri, Fitz-Ausculf's successor, about 1203,

granted the manor to Sir Thomas de Erdington, Ambassador to King John,

mentioned before, who had married his sister; paying annually a pair of

spurs, or six-pence, as a nominal rent, but meant, in reality, as a

portion for the lady.

The family of Erdington, about 1275, sold it to Thomas de Maidenhache,

who did not seem to live upon friendly terms with his neighbour, William

de Birmingham; for, in 1290, he brought an action against him for

fishing in his water, called Moysich (Dead-branch) leading into Tame,

towards Scarford-bridge (Shareford, dividing the shares, or parts of the

parish, Aston manor from Erdington, now Sawford-bridge) which implies a

degree of unkindness; because William could not amuse himself in his own

manor of Birmingham, for he might as well have angled in one of his

streets, as in the river Rea. The two lords had, probably, four years

before been on friendly terms, when they jointly lent their assistance

to the hospital of St. Thomas, in Birmingham.

Maidenhache left four daughters; Sibel, married Adam de Grymsorwe, who

took with her the manor of Aston; a daughter of this house, in 1367,

sold it to John atte Holte, of Birmingham, in whose family it continued

415 years, till 1782, when Henage Legge, Esq; acceded to possession.

This wretched bog was the habitation of all the lords, from Godmund to

the Holtes, the Erdington's excepted; for Maud Grymsorwe executing the

conveyance at Aston, indicates that she resided there; and Thomas Holte,

being possessed of Duddeston, proves that he did not: therefore I

conclude, that the building, as it ought, went to decay soon after; so

that desolation has claimed the place for her own near four hundred

years. This is corroberated by some old timber trees, long since upon

the spot where the building stood.

The extensive parish of Aston takes in the two extremes of Birmingham,

which supplies her with more christenings, weddings, and burials, than

were, a few years ago, supplied by the whole parish of Birmingham.

An History of Birmingham (1783) · 第 137 / 155 题