CANAL.

An act was obtained, in 1767, to open a cut between Birmingham and the

coal delphs about Wednesbury.

The necessary article of coal, before this act, was brought by land, at

about thirteen shillings per ton, but now at seven.

It was common to see a train of carriages for miles, to the great

destruction of the road, and the annoyance of travellers.

This dust is extended in the whole to about twenty-two miles in length,

'till it unites with what we may justly term the grand artery, or

Staffordshire Canal; which, eroding the island, communicates with Hull,

Bristol and Liverpool. The expence was about 70,000_l_. divided into

shares 140_l_. each, of which no man can purchase more than ten, and

which now sell for about 370_l_.

The proprietors took a perpetual lease of six acres of land, of Sir

Thomas Gooch, at 47_l_. per annum, which is converted into a wharf, upon

the front of which is erected an handsome office for the dispatch

of business.

[ILLUSTRATION: A Plan of the Navigable Canal from Birmingham to

Autherley]

[ILLUSTRATION: Navigation Office]

This watery passage, exclusive of loading the proprietors with wealth,

tends greatly to the improvement of some branches of trade, by

introducing heavy materials at a small expence, such as pig iron for the

founderies, lime-stone, articles for the manufacture of brass and steel,

also stone, brick, slate, timber, &c.

It is happy for the world, that public interest is grafted upon private,

and that both flourish together.

This grand work, like other productions of Birmingham birth, was rather

hasty; the managers, not being able to find patience to worm round the

hill at Smethwick, or cut through, have wisely travelled over it by the

help of twelve locks, with six they mount the summit, and with six more

descend to the former level; forgetting the great waste of water, and

the small supply from the rivulets, and also, the amazing loss of of

time in climbing this curious ladder, consisting of twelve liquid steps.

It is worthy of remark, that the level of the earth, is nearly the same

at Birmingham as at the pits: what benefit then would accrue to

commerce, could the boats travel a dead flat of fourteen miles without

interruption? The use of the canal would increase, great variety of

goods be brought which are now excluded, and these delivered with more

expedition, with less expence, and the waste of water never felt; but,

by the introduction of twelve unnecessary locks, the company may

experience five plagues more than fell on Egypt.

The boats are nearly alike, constructed to fit the locks, carry about

twenty-five tons, and are each drawn by something like the skeleton of a

horse, covered with skin: whether he subsists upon the scent of the

water, is a doubt; but whether his life is a scene of affliction, is

not; for the unfeeling driver has no employment but to whip him from one

end of the canal to the other. While the teams practised the turnpike

road, the lash was divided among five unfortunate animals, but now the

whole wrath of the driver falls upon one.

We can scarcely view a boat travelling this liquid road, without raising

opposite sensations--pleased to think of its great benefit to the

community, and grieved to behold wanton punishment.

I see a large field of cruelty expanding before me, which I could easily

prevail with myself to enter; in which we behold the child plucking a

wing and a leg off a fly, to try how the poor insect can perform with

half his limbs; or running a pin through the posteriors of a locust, to

observe it spinning through the air, like a comet, drawing a tail of

thread. If we allow, man has a right to destroy noxious animals, we

cannot allow he has a right to protract their pain by a lingering death.

By fine gradations the modes of cruelty improve with years, in pinching

the tail of a cat for the music of her voice, kicking a dog because we

have trod upon his foot, or hanging him for _fun_, 'till we arrive at

the priests in the church of Rome, who burnt people for opinion; or to

the painter, who begged the life of a criminal, that he might torture

him to death with the severest pangs, to catch the agonizing feature,

and transfer it into his favourite piece, of a dying Saviour. But did

that Saviour teach such doctrine? Humanity would wish rather to have

lost the piece, than have heard of the cruelty. What, if the injured

ghost of the criminal is at this moment torturing that of the painter?--

But as this capacious field is beyond the line I profess, and, as I have

no direct accusation against the people of my regard, I shall not enter.

An History of Birmingham (1783) · 第 113 / 155 题