SIXTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 99, Art. 6]

Whether the Old Law Should Have Induced Men to the Observance of Its

Precepts, by Means of Temporal Promises and Threats?

Objection 1: It would seem that the Old Law should not have induced

men to the observance of its precepts, by means of temporal promises

and threats. For the purpose of the Divine law is to subject man to

God by fear and love: hence it is written (Deut. 10:12): "And now,

Israel, what doth the Lord thy God require of thee, but that thou

fear the Lord thy God, and walk in His ways, and love Him?" But the

desire for temporal goods leads man away from God: for Augustine says

(Qq. lxxxiii, qu. 36), that "covetousness is the bane of charity."

Therefore temporal promises and threats seem to be contrary to the

intention of a lawgiver: and this makes a law worthy of rejection, as

the Philosopher declares (Polit. ii, 6).

Obj. 2: Further, the Divine law is more excellent than human law.

Now, in sciences, we notice that the loftier the science, the higher

the means of persuasion that it employs. Therefore, since human law

employs temporal threats and promises, as means of persuading man,

the Divine law should have used, not these, but more lofty means.

Obj. 3: Further, the reward of righteousness and the punishment of

guilt cannot be that which befalls equally the good and the wicked.

But as stated in Eccles. 9:2, "all" temporal "things equally happen

to the just and to the wicked, to the good and the evil, to the clean

and to the unclean, to him that offereth victims, and to him that

despiseth sacrifices." Therefore temporal goods or evils are not

suitably set forth as punishments or rewards of the commandments of

the Divine law.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Isa. 1:19, 20): "If you be willing,

and will hearken to Me, you shall eat the good things of the land.

But if you will not, and will provoke Me to wrath: the sword shall

devour you."

_I answer that,_ As in speculative sciences men are persuaded to

assent to the conclusions by means of syllogistic arguments, so too

in every law, men are persuaded to observe its precepts by means of

punishments and rewards. Now it is to be observed that, in

speculative sciences, the means of persuasion are adapted to the

conditions of the pupil: wherefore the process of argument in

sciences should be ordered becomingly, so that the instruction is

based on principles more generally known. And thus also he who would

persuade a man to the observance of any precepts, needs to move him

at first by things for which he has an affection; just as children

are induced to do something, by means of little childish gifts. Now

it has been said above (Q. 98, AA. 1, 2, 3) that the Old Law disposed

men to (the coming of) Christ, as the imperfect in comparison

disposes to the perfect, wherefore it was given to a people as yet

imperfect in comparison to the perfection which was to result from

Christ's coming: and for this reason, that people is compared to a

child that is still under a pedagogue (Gal. 3:24). But the perfection

of man consists in his despising temporal things and cleaving to

things spiritual, as is clear from the words of the Apostle (Phil.

3:13, 15): "Forgetting the things that are behind, I stretch [Vulg.:

'and stretching'] forth myself to those that are before . . . Let us

therefore, as many as are perfect, be thus minded." Those who are yet

imperfect desire temporal goods, albeit in subordination to God:

whereas the perverse place their end in temporalities. It was

therefore fitting that the Old Law should conduct men to God by means

of temporal goods for which the imperfect have an affection.

Reply Obj. 1: Covetousness whereby man places his end in

temporalities, is the bane of charity. But the attainment of temporal

goods which man desires in subordination to God is a road leading the

imperfect to the love of God, according to Ps. 48:19: "He will praise

Thee, when Thou shalt do well to him."

Reply Obj. 2: Human law persuades men by means of temporal rewards or

punishments to be inflicted by men: whereas the Divine law persuades

men by means of rewards or punishments to be received from God. In

this respect it employs higher means.

Reply Obj. 3: As any one can see, who reads carefully the story of

the Old Testament, the common weal of the people prospered under the

Law as long as they obeyed it; and as soon as they departed from the

precepts of the Law they were overtaken by many calamities. But

certain individuals, although they observed the justice of the Law,

met with misfortunes--either because they had already become

spiritual (so that misfortune might withdraw them all the more from

attachment to temporal things, and that their virtue might be

tried)--or because, while outwardly fulfilling the works of the Law,

their heart was altogether fixed on temporal goods, and far removed

from God, according to Isa. 29:13 (Matt. 15:8): "This people honoreth

Me with their lips; but their hearts is far from Me."

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 641 / 746 题