THIRD ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 99, Art. 3]

Whether the Old Law Comprises Ceremonial, Besides Moral, Precepts?

Objection 1: It would seem that the Old Law does not comprise

ceremonial, besides moral, precepts. For every law that is given to

man is for the purpose of directing human actions. Now human actions

are called moral, as stated above (Q. 1, A. 3). Therefore it seems

that the Old Law given to men should not comprise other than moral

precepts.

Obj. 2: Further, those precepts that are styled ceremonial seem to

refer to the Divine worship. But Divine worship is the act of a

virtue, viz. religion, which, as Tully says (De Invent. ii) "offers

worship and ceremony to the Godhead." Since, then, the moral precepts

are about acts of virtue, as stated above (A. 2), it seems that the

ceremonial precepts should not be distinct from the moral.

Obj. 3: Further, the ceremonial precepts seem to be those which

signify something figuratively. But, as Augustine observes (De Doctr.

Christ. ii, 3, 4), "of all signs employed by men words hold the first

place." Therefore there is no need for the Law to contain ceremonial

precepts about certain figurative actions.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Deut. 4:13, 14): "Ten words . . .

He wrote in two tables of stone; and He commanded me at that time

that I should teach you the ceremonies and judgments which you shall

do." But the ten commandments of the Law are moral precepts.

Therefore besides the moral precepts there are others which are

ceremonial.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 2), the Divine law is instituted

chiefly in order to direct men to God; while human law is instituted

chiefly in order to direct men in relation to one another. Hence

human laws have not concerned themselves with the institution of

anything relating to Divine worship except as affecting the common

good of mankind: and for this reason they have devised many

institutions relating to Divine matters, according as it seemed

expedient for the formation of human morals; as may be seen in the

rites of the Gentiles. On the other hand the Divine law directed men

to one another according to the demands of that order whereby man is

directed to God, which order was the chief aim of that law. Now man

is directed to God not only by the interior acts of the mind, which

are faith, hope, and love, but also by certain external works,

whereby man makes profession of his subjection to God: and it is

these works that are said to belong to the Divine worship. This

worship is called "ceremony,"--the _munia,_ i.e. gifts, of Ceres (who

was the goddess of fruits), as some say: because, at first, offerings

were made to God from the fruits: or because, as Valerius Maximus

states [*Fact. et Dict. Memor. i, 1], the word "ceremony" was

introduced among the Latins, to signify the Divine worship, being

derived from a town near Rome called "Caere": since, when Rome was

taken by the Gauls, the sacred chattels of the Romans were taken

thither and most carefully preserved. Accordingly those precepts of

the Law which refer to the Divine worship are specially called

ceremonial.

Reply Obj. 1: Human acts extend also to the Divine worship: and

therefore the Old Law given to man contains precepts about these

matters also.

Reply Obj. 2: As stated above (Q. 91, A. 3), the precepts of the

natural law are general, and require to be determined: and they are

determined both by human law and by Divine law. And just as these

very determinations which are made by human law are said to be, not

of natural, but of positive law; so the determinations of the

precepts of the natural law, effected by the Divine law, are distinct

from the moral precepts which belong to the natural law. Wherefore to

worship God, since it is an act of virtue, belongs to a moral

precept; but the determination of this precept, namely that He is to

be worshipped by such and such sacrifices, and such and such

offerings, belongs to the ceremonial precepts. Consequently the

ceremonial precepts are distinct from the moral precepts.

Reply Obj. 3: As Dionysius says (Coel. Hier. i), the things of God

cannot be manifested to men except by means of sensible similitudes.

Now these similitudes move the soul more when they are not only

expressed in words, but also offered to the senses. Wherefore the

things of God are set forth in the Scriptures not only by similitudes

expressed in words, as in the case of metaphorical expressions; but

also by similitudes of things set before the eyes, which pertains to

the ceremonial precepts.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 638 / 746 题