SIXTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 85, Art. 6]

Whether Death and Other Defects Are Natural to Man?

Objection 1: It would seem that death and such like defects are

natural to man. For "the corruptible and the incorruptible differ

generically" (Metaph. x, text. 26). But man is of the same genus as

other animals which are naturally corruptible. Therefore man is

naturally corruptible.

Obj. 2: Further, whatever is composed of contraries is naturally

corruptible, as having within itself the cause of corruption. But

such is the human body. Therefore it is naturally corruptible.

Obj. 3: Further, a hot thing naturally consumes moisture. Now human

life is preserved by hot and moist elements. Since therefore the

vital functions are fulfilled by the action of natural heat, as

stated in _De Anima_ ii, text. 50, it seems that death and such like

defects are natural to man.

_On the contrary,_ (1) God made in man whatever is natural to him.

Now "God made not death" (Wis. 1:13). Therefore death is not natural

to man.

(2) Further, that which is natural cannot be called either a

punishment or an evil: since what is natural to a thing is suitable

to it. But death and such like defects are the punishment of original

sin, as stated above (A. 5). Therefore they are not natural to man.

(3) Further, matter is proportionate to form, and everything to its

end. Now man's end is everlasting happiness, as stated above (Q. 2,

A. 7; Q. 5, AA. 3, 4): and the form of the human body is the rational

soul, as was proved in the First Part (Q. 75, A. 6). Therefore the

human body is naturally incorruptible.

_I answer that,_ We may speak of any corruptible thing in two ways;

first, in respect of its universal nature, secondly, as regards its

particular nature. A thing's particular nature is its own power of

action and self-preservation. And in respect of this nature, every

corruption and defect is contrary to nature, as stated in _De Coelo_

ii, text. 37, since this power tends to the being and preservation of

the thing to which it belongs.

On the other hand, the universal nature is an active force in some

universal principle of nature, for instance in some heavenly body; or

again belonging to some superior substance, in which sense God is

said by some to be "the Nature Who makes nature." This force intends

the good and the preservation of the universe, for which alternate

generation and corruption in things are requisite: and in this

respect corruption and defect in things are natural, not indeed as

regards the inclination of the form which is the principle of being

and perfection, but as regards the inclination of matter which is

allotted proportionately to its particular form according to the

discretion of the universal agent. And although every form intends

perpetual being as far as it can, yet no form of a corruptible being

can achieve its own perpetuity, except the rational soul; for the

reason that the latter is not entirely subject to matter, as other

forms are; indeed it has an immaterial operation of its own, as

stated in the First Part (Q. 75, A. 2). Consequently as regards his

form, incorruption is more natural to man than to other corruptible

things. But since that very form has a matter composed of contraries,

from the inclination of that matter there results corruptibility in

the whole. In this respect man is naturally corruptible as regards

the nature of his matter left to itself, but not as regards the

nature of his form.

The first three objections argue on the side of the matter; while the

other three argue on the side of the form. Wherefore in order to

solve them, we must observe that the form of man which is the

rational soul, in respect of its incorruptibility is adapted to its

end, which is everlasting happiness: whereas the human body, which is

corruptible, considered in respect of its nature, is, in a way,

adapted to its form, and, in another way, it is not. For we may note

a twofold condition in any matter, one which the agent chooses, and

another which is not chosen by the agent, and is a natural condition

of matter. Thus, a smith in order to make a knife, chooses a matter

both hard and flexible, which can be sharpened so as to be useful for

cutting, and in respect of this condition iron is a matter adapted

for a knife: but that iron be breakable and inclined to rust, results

from the natural disposition of iron, nor does the workman choose

this in the iron, indeed he would do without it if he could:

wherefore this disposition of matter is not adapted to the workman's

intention, nor to the purpose of his art. In like manner the human

body is the matter chosen by nature in respect of its being of a

mixed temperament, in order that it may be most suitable as an organ

of touch and of the other sensitive and motive powers. Whereas the

fact that it is corruptible is due to a condition of matter, and is

not chosen by nature: indeed nature would choose an incorruptible

matter if it could. But God, to Whom every nature is subject, in

forming man supplied the defect of nature, and by the gift of

original justice, gave the body a certain incorruptibility, as was

stated in the First Part (Q. 97, A. 1). It is in this sense that it

is said that "God made not death," and that death is the punishment

of sin.

This suffices for the Replies to the Objections.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 555 / 746 题