EIGHTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 77, Art. 8]

Whether a Sin Committed Through Passion Can Be Mortal?

Objection 1: It would seem that sin committed through passion cannot

be mortal. Because venial sin is condivided with mortal sin. Now sin

committed from weakness is venial, since it has in itself a motive

for pardon (_venia_). Since therefore sin committed through passion

is a sin of weakness, it seems that it cannot be mortal.

Obj. 2: Further, the cause is more powerful than its effect. But

passion cannot be a mortal sin, for there is no mortal sin in the

sensuality, as stated above (Q. 74, A. 4). Therefore a sin committed

through passion cannot be mortal.

Obj. 3: Further, passion is a hindrance to reason, as explained above

(AA. 1, 2). Now it belongs to the reason to turn to God, or to turn

away from Him, which is the essence of a mortal sin. Therefore a sin

committed through passion cannot be mortal.

_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (Rom. 7:5) that "the passions of

the sins . . . work [Vulg.: 'did work'] in our members to bring forth

fruit unto death." Now it is proper to mortal sin to bring forth

fruit unto death. Therefore sin committed through passion may be

mortal.

_I answer that,_ Mortal sin, as stated above (Q. 72, A. 5), consists

in turning away from our last end which is God, which aversion

pertains to the deliberating reason, whose function it is also to

direct towards the end. Therefore that which is contrary to the last

end can happen not to be a mortal sin, only when the deliberating

reason is unable to come to the rescue, which is the case in sudden

movements. Now when anyone proceeds from passion to a sinful act, or

to a deliberate consent, this does not happen suddenly: and so the

deliberating reason can come to the rescue here, since it can drive

the passion away, or at least prevent it from having its effect, as

stated above: wherefore if it does not come to the rescue, there is a

mortal sin; and it is thus, as we see, that many murders and

adulteries are committed through passion.

Reply Obj. 1: A sin may be venial in three ways. First, through its

cause, i.e. through having cause to be forgiven, which cause lessens

the sin; thus a sin that is committed through weakness or ignorance

is said to be venial. Secondly, through its issue; thus every sin,

through repentance, becomes venial, i.e. receives pardon (_veniam_).

Thirdly, by its genus, e.g. an idle word. This is the only kind of

venial sin that is opposed to mortal sin: whereas the objection

regards the first kind.

Reply Obj. 2: Passion causes sin as regards the adherence to

something. But that this be a mortal sin regards the aversion, which

follows accidentally from the adherence, as stated above (A. 6, ad

1): hence the argument does not prove.

Reply Obj. 3: Passion does not always hinder the act of reason

altogether: consequently the reason remains in possession of its

free-will, so as to turn away from God, or turn to Him. If, however,

the use of reason be taken away altogether, the sin is no longer

either mortal or venial.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 512 / 746 题