SECOND ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 70, Art. 2]

Whether the Fruits Differ from the Beatitudes?

Objection 1: It would seem that the fruits do not differ from the

beatitudes. For the beatitudes are assigned to the gifts, as stated

above (Q. 69, A. 1, ad 1). But the gifts perfect man in so far as he

is moved by the Holy Ghost. Therefore the beatitudes themselves are

fruits of the Holy Ghost.

Obj. 2: Further, as the fruit of eternal life is to future beatitude

which is that of actual possession, so are the fruits of the present

life to the beatitudes of the present life, which are based on hope.

Now the fruit of eternal life is identified with future beatitude.

Therefore the fruits of the present life are the beatitudes.

Obj. 3: Further, fruit is essentially something ultimate and

delightful. Now this is the very nature of beatitude, as stated above

(Q. 3, A. 1; Q. 4, A. 1). Therefore fruit and beatitude have the same

nature, and consequently should not be distinguished from one another.

_On the contrary,_ Things divided into different species, differ from

one another. But fruits and beatitudes are divided into different

parts, as is clear from the way in which they are enumerated.

Therefore the fruits differ from the beatitudes.

_I answer that,_ More is required for a beatitude than for a fruit.

Because it is sufficient for a fruit to be something ultimate and

delightful; whereas for a beatitude, it must be something perfect and

excellent. Hence all the beatitudes may be called fruits, but not

vice versa. For the fruits are any virtuous deeds in which one

delights: whereas the beatitudes are none but perfect works, and

which, by reason of their perfection, are assigned to the gifts

rather than to the virtues, as already stated (Q. 69, A. 1, ad 1).

Reply Obj. 1: This argument proves the beatitudes to be fruits, but

not that all the fruits are beatitudes.

Reply Obj. 2: The fruit of eternal life is ultimate and perfect

simply: hence it nowise differs from future beatitude. On the other

hand the fruits of the present life are not simply ultimate and

perfect; wherefore not all the fruits are beatitudes.

Reply Obj. 3: More is required for a beatitude than for a fruit, as

stated.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 452 / 746 题