FIRST ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 43, Art. 1]

Whether Love Is the Cause of Fear?

Objection 1: It would seem that love is not the cause of fear. For

that which leads to a thing is its cause. But "fear leads to the love

of charity" as Augustine says on the canonical epistle of John

(Tract. ix). Therefore fear is the cause of love, and not conversely.

Obj. 2: Further, the Philosopher says (Rhet. ii, 5) that "those are

feared most from whom we dread the advent of some evil." But the

dread of evil being caused by someone, makes us hate rather than love

him. Therefore fear is caused by hate rather than by love.

Obj. 3: Further, it has been stated above (Q. 42, A. 3) that those

things which occur by our own doing are not fearful. But that which

we do from love, is done from our inmost heart. Therefore fear is not

caused by love.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (QQ. 83, qu. 33): "There can be no

doubt that there is no cause for fear save the loss of what we love,

when we possess it, or the failure to obtain what we hope for."

Therefore all fear is caused by our loving something: and

consequently love is the cause of fear.

_I answer that,_ The objects of the soul's passions stand in relation

thereto as the forms to things natural or artificial: because the

passions of the soul take their species from their objects, as the

aforesaid things do from their forms. Therefore, just as whatever is

a cause of the form, is a cause of the thing constituted by that

form, so whatever is a cause, in any way whatever, of the object, is

a cause of the passion. Now a thing may be a cause of the object,

either by way of efficient cause, or by way of material disposition.

Thus the object of pleasure is good apprehended as suitable and

conjoined: and its efficient cause is that which causes the

conjunction, or the suitableness, or goodness, or apprehension of

that good thing; while its cause by way of material disposition, is a

habit or any sort of disposition by reason of which this conjoined

good becomes suitable or is apprehended as such.

Accordingly, as to the matter in question, the object of fear is

something reckoned as an evil to come, near at hand and difficult to

avoid. Therefore that which can inflict such an evil, is the

efficient cause of the object of fear, and, consequently, of fear

itself. While that which renders a man so disposed that thing is such

an evil to him, is a cause of fear and of its object, by way of

material disposition. And thus it is that love causes fear: since it

is through his loving a certain good, that whatever deprives a man of

that good is an evil to him, and that consequently he fears it as an

evil.

Reply Obj. 1: As stated above (Q. 42, A. 1), fear, of itself and in

the first place, regards the evil from which it recoils as being

contrary to some loved good: and thus fear, of itself, is born of

love. But, in the second place, it regards the cause from which that

evil ensues: so that sometimes, accidentally, fear gives rise to

love; in so far as, for instance, through fear of God's punishments,

man keeps His commandments, and thus begins to hope, while hope leads

to love, as stated above (Q. 40, A. 7).

Reply Obj. 2: He, from whom evil is expected, is indeed hated at

first; but afterwards, when once we begin to hope for good from him,

we begin to love him. But the good, the contrary evil of which is

feared, was loved from the beginning.

Reply Obj. 3: This argument is true of that which is the efficient

cause of the evil to be feared: whereas love causes fear by way of

material disposition, as stated above.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 295 / 746 题