THIRD ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 29, Art. 3]

Whether Hatred Is Stronger Than Love?

Objection 1: It would seem that hatred is stronger than love. For

Augustine says (QQ. 83, qu. 36): "There is no one who does not flee

from pain, more than he desires pleasure." But flight from pain

pertains to hatred; while desire for pleasure belongs to love.

Therefore hatred is stronger than love.

Obj. 2: Further, the weaker is overcome by the stronger. But love is

overcome by hatred: when, that is to say, love is turned into hatred.

Therefore hatred is stronger than love.

Obj. 3: Further, the emotions of the soul are shown by their effects.

But man insists more on repelling what is hateful, than on seeking

what is pleasant: thus also irrational animals refrain from pleasure

for fear of the whip, as Augustine instances (QQ. 83, qu. 36).

Therefore hatred is stronger than love.

_On the contrary,_ Good is stronger than evil; because "evil does

nothing except in virtue of good," as Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv).

But hatred and love differ according to the difference of good and

evil. Therefore love is stronger than hatred.

_I answer that,_ It is impossible for an effect to be stronger than

its cause. Now every hatred arises from some love as its cause, as

above stated (A. 2). Therefore it is impossible for hatred to be

stronger than love absolutely.

But furthermore, love must needs be, absolutely speaking, stronger

than hatred. Because a thing is moved to the end more strongly than

to the means. Now turning away from evil is directed as a means to

the gaining of good. Wherefore, absolutely speaking, the soul's

movement in respect of good is stronger than its movement in respect

of evil.

Nevertheless hatred sometimes seems to be stronger than love, for two

reasons. First, because hatred is more keenly felt than love. For,

since the sensitive perception is accompanied by a certain

impression; when once the impression has been received it is not felt

so keenly as in the moment of receiving it. Hence the heat of a

hectic fever, though greater, is nevertheless not felt so much as the

heat of tertian fever; because the heat of the hectic fever is

habitual and like a second nature. For this reason, love is felt more

keenly in the absence of the object loved; thus Augustine says (De

Trin. x, 12) that "love is felt more keenly when we lack what we

love." And for the same reason, the unbecomingness of that which is

hated is felt more keenly than the becomingness of that which is

loved. Secondly, because comparison is made between a hatred and a

love which are not mutually corresponding. Because, according to

different degrees of good there are different degrees of love to

which correspond different degrees of hatred. Wherefore a hatred that

corresponds to a greater love, moves us more than a lesser love.

Hence it is clear how to reply to the First Objection. For the love

of pleasure is less than the love of self-preservation, to which

corresponds flight from pain. Wherefore we flee from pain more than

we love pleasure.

Reply Obj. 2: Hatred would never overcome love, were it not for the

greater love to which that hatred corresponds. Thus man loves

himself, more than he loves his friend: and because he loves himself,

his friend is hateful to him, if he oppose him.

Reply Obj. 3: The reason why we act with greater insistence in

repelling what is hateful, is because we feel hatred more keenly.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 206 / 746 题