NORTHWARD!

After resting some days in the old capital of Quito, our travellers

proceeded to the small port of Barbacoas, on the west coast of Equador;

and thence took passage for Panama. Crossing the famous isthmus to

Porto Bello, they shipped again for New Orleans, on the Mississippi. Of

course, their next aim was to procure the North American bears--

including the Polar, which is equally an inhabitant of northern Asia,

but which, by the conditions of their route, would be more conveniently

reached on the continent of North America. Alexis knew that the black

bear (_ursus americanus_) might be met with anywhere on that continent

from the shores of Hudson's Bay to the isthmus of Panama, and from the

seaboard of the Atlantic to the coast of the Pacific Ocean. No other

has so wide a range as this species--with the exception, perhaps, of the

brown bear of Europe--which, as we have said, is also an Asiatic animal.

Throughout the whole extent of country above defined, the black bear

may be encountered, not specially confining himself to mountain-ranges.

True, in the more settled districts he has been driven to these--as

affording him a refuge from the hunter; but in his normal condition he

is by no means a mountain-dwelling animal. On the contrary, he affects

equally the low-wooded bottoms of ravines, and is as much at home in a

climate of tropical or sub-tropical character, as in the cold forests of

the Canadas.

Mr Spencer Baird--the naturalist intrusted by the American Government

to describe the _fauna_ of their territory, and furnished for his text

with one of the most splendid collections ever made--in speaking of the

genus _ursus_, makes the following remarks:--

"The species of bears are not numerous, nor are they to be found except

in the temperate regions of the northern hemisphere. North America

possesses more species than any other part of the world, having at least

four, and perhaps five."

With the exception of the very idle assertion that "the species of bears

are not numerous," every idea put forth in the above categorical

declaration is the very reverse of what is true.

Is the polar bear found only in the temperate regions of the northern

hemisphere? Is the _ursus arctos_ of Europe confined to these limits?

Are the bears of South America?--the sloth bear of India and Ceylon?--

the bruang of Borneo?--and his near congener, the bruang of Java and

Sumatra? Why, these last are actually dwellers among palm-trees--as the

cocoa-planters know to their cost! Even Mr Baird's own American black

bear is not so "temperate" in his habits; but loves the half-tropical

climate of Florida and Texas quite as much as the cold declivities of

the Alleghanies.

And how does North America possess more species than any other part of

the world? Even admitting the doubtful fifth, on the continent of Asia

there are six species at the very least; and, if we are allowed to

include the Oriental islands, we make eight Asiatic. There are three

species in the Himalaya mountains alone--unquestionably distinct,

dwelling in separate zones of altitude, but with the territory of all

three visible at a single _coup d'oeil_.

Mr Baird is a naturalist of great celebrity in America. He is a

secretary of the Smithsonian Institution: he should make better use of

the books which its fine library can afford him.

The United States' Government is extremely unfortunate in the selection

of its scientific _employes_--more especially in the departments of

natural history. Perhaps the most liberal appropriation ever made for

ethnological purposes--that for collecting a complete account of the

North American Indians--has been spent without purpose, the "job" having

fallen into the hands of a "placeman," or "old hunker," as the Americans

term it--a man neither learned nor intellectual. With the exception of

the statistics furnished by Indian agents, the voluminous work of

Schoolcraft is absolutely worthless; and students of ethnology cannot

contemplate such a misappropriation without feelings of regret.

Fortunately, the American aboriginal had already found a true portrayer

and historian. Private enterprise, as is not unfrequently the case, has

outstripped Government patronage in the performance of its task. In the

unpretending volumes of George Catlin we find the most complete

ethnological monograph ever given to the world; but just for that

reason, Catlin, not Schoolcraft, should have been chosen for the "job."

Knowing the range of the black bear to be thus grandly extended, our

young hunters had a choice of places in which to look for one; but, as

there is no place where these animals are more common than in Louisiana

itself, they concluded that they could not do better than there choose

their hunting-ground. In the great forests, which still cover a large

portion of Louisiana, and especially upon the banks of the sluggish

_bayous_, where the marshy soil and the huge cypress trees, festooned

with Spanish moss, bid defiance to all attempts at cultivation, the

black bear still roams at will. There he is found in sufficient numbers

to ensure the procuring of a specimen without much difficulty.

The hunters of these parts have various modes of capturing him. The

log-trap is a common plan; but the planters enjoy the sport of running

him down with dogs; or rather should it be termed running him up; since

the chase usually ends by Bruin taking to a tree, and thus unconsciously

putting himself within reach of the unerring rifle.

It was by this means that our young hunters determined to try their

luck; and they had no difficulty in procuring the necessary adjuncts to

ensure success. The great Czar, powerful everywhere, was not without

his agent at New Orleans. From him a letter of introduction was

obtained to a planter living on one of the interior _bayous_; and our

heroes, having repaired thither, were at once set in train for the

sport--the planter placing himself, his house, his hounds, and his

horses at their disposal.

Bruin: The Grand Bear Hunt · 第 75 / 131 题