CAPHEISIAS, a Theban (brother of Epaminondas), who tells the story
of the return.
TIMOTHEUS., Athenian
ARCHIDAMUS., Athenian
THE SONS OF ARCHINUS., Athenian
LYSITHEIDES., Athenian
OTHER FRIENDS.
I. _Archidamus._ I once heard a painter, Capheisias, say a [Sidenote: B]
striking thing about the different people who come to view pictures,
which he put as a simile. Spectators with no technical knowledge, he
said, are like those who greet a large company in the mass; others, who
possess fine taste and a love of art, resemble those who have a personal
word for all comers. The former get only a general view of the works
before them, which is never accurate; the latter discuss each piece
critically and in detail, and no point of execution, good or bad,
escapes inspection and remark. Now I think that it is just the same with
the [Sidenote: C] actions of real life. Duller minds are satisfied if
they learn from history the summary account of what occurred and its
outcome; lovers of what is honourable and beautiful take keener delight
in hearing all particulars of the performances inspired by that great
Art Virtue. To the actual result, Fortune has much to say; but he who
dwells on causes and particulars sees Virtue at odds with circumstance,
acts of rational daring done in the face of danger, and calculation
meeting opportunity and passion. Take it that we belong to the second
class. Begin at the beginning of the enterprise, and give us all the
incidents and [Sidenote: D] all the speeches which were no doubt
delivered in your presence; and believe that I would not have hesitated
to go to Thebes on purpose to hear the story, but that the Athenians are
already beginning to think me too much of a Boeotian.
_Capheisias._ Indeed, Archidamus, since you are so kind as to press for
the whole story, it would be my duty to make it, as Pindar[21] says, ‘a
call before all business’ to come here to tell it; but as we are brought
here on an embassy, and have nothing to do until we receive the answers
of the people, I feel that any reluctance or embarrassment on my part
towards so kind and good a friend might well wake up the old reproach
against the Boeotians that they hate discussion. It was already fading
[Sidenote: E] away, thanks to your Socrates; but our own care for
Lysis,[22] of blessed memory, showed us true enthusiasts. But see whom
we have present: is it convenient to them to listen to so long a story
and to so many speeches? The narrative is not a short one, since you
yourself bid me include the speeches.
_Archidamus._ You do not know these friends, Capheisias? No, but you
should; sons of good fathers who were good friends to your people. This
is Lysitheides, nephew of Thrasybulus; [Sidenote: F] this is Timotheus,
Conon’s son; these are the sons of Archinus; the others are all of our
brotherhood; so your story finds a friendly and congenial audience.
_Capheisias._ That is well. But what should you think a good point for
me to start from, in view of what you know already?
_Archidamus._ We know fairly well, Capheisias, how things were at Thebes
before the return of the exiles. We had heard at Athens how Archias and
Leontides persuaded Phoebidas to [Sidenote: 576] seize the Cadmeia
during a truce; how they expelled some of the citizens and terrorized
others, and seized office for themselves in defiance of law. We were the
personal hosts here of Melon and Pelopidas, and constantly in their
company so long as they were in exile. Again, we had heard how the
Lacedaemonians fined Phoebidas for seizing the Cadmeia, removed him from
the command against Olynthus, and then replaced him at Thebes by
Lysanoridas and two others, and kept a stronger garrison than before in
the Citadel. We were aware, too, how Ismenias met an unworthy death,
since, immediately after his trial, Gorgidas wrote the whole account in
a letter to the [Sidenote: B] exiles here. Thus it remains for you to
tell us about the actual return of our friends and the capture of the
tyrants.
II. _Capheisias._ Well then, Archidamus, during those days, all of us
who were concerned in the movement were accustomed to meet for
conference when necessary in the house of Simmias, who was recovering
from a wound in the leg; ostensibly passing the time in philosophical
talk, into which, as a blind, we often drew Archias and Leontides, men
not altogether strangers to [Sidenote: C] such discussion. For Simmias
had spent much time abroad, and wandered among men of other lands, and
had shortly before this returned to Thebes full of all sorts of stories
and outlandish accounts. These stories Archias used to enjoy when he
chanced to have leisure, taking his seat with the young men, and liking
us to pass the time in talk rather than attend to their proceedings. On
the day upon which the exiles were to reach the walls at dusk, a man
came in from here, sent by Pherenicus, known to none of our party except
Charon; he proceeded to explain that the younger exiles, twelve in
number, had taken hounds to hunt the Cithaeron country, intending to
reach Thebes towards evening. He had been sent, he said, in advance
[Sidenote: D] to tell us this, and to find out who was to provide the
house for their concealment on arrival, so that they might have notice
and go straight to it. While we were puzzling it over, Charon agreed to
provide his own house. So the man settled to return to the exiles as
fast as he could.
III. Here the prophet Theocritus pressed my hand hard, and looking at
Charon, who was walking in front, said: ‘This man is no philosopher,
Capheisias; he has received no extraordinary training, as Epaminondas
your brother has; yet you see how he is naturally drawn by the laws
towards the nobler [Sidenote: E] course, volunteering to encounter the
greatest danger for our country’s sake. Whereas Epaminondas, who claims
to have been trained to virtue above all Boeotians, is dull and
spiritless;[23] what better opportunity than this will he ever have to
bring into play his fine gifts and training?’ I said: ‘Not so fast,
[Sidenote: F] Theocritus the eager! We are carrying out what we
ourselves resolved; but Epaminondas, failing to persuade us to drop the
plan, as he thinks would be best, naturally resists when invited to a
course of action which he dislikes and disapproves. Suppose a physician
undertook to cure a disease without the use of knife or fire: you would
not be using him fairly, to my thinking, if you compelled him to cut or
burn.[24] Very well; my brother, as you know, will not have any citizen
die without a trial, yet is eager to work with those who wish to free
the city from internal bloodshed and slaughter. As, however, he fails to
convince the majority, and as we have embarked on this course, he bids
you let him stand out, clear and guiltless of murder, and free to watch
opportunities; when justice and expediency [Sidenote: 577] meet, he will
strike in. He feels that, work once begun, there will be no limitations;
perhaps Pherenicus and Pelopidas will turn their attack against the
greatest criminals, but Eumolpidas and Samidas, men of fire and passion,
when night puts power in their hands, will not sheathe their swords
before they have filled the city with murder from end to end, and
dispatched many of our leading men.
IV. While I was thus conversing with Theocritus, Galaxidorus kept trying
to check us;[25] Archias was near, and Lysanoridas the Spartan, both
walking quickly from the Cadmeia, [Sidenote: B] apparently towards the
same point as ourselves. So we broke off; Archias called Theocritus, and
drew him towards Lysanoridas; then he talked a long time with them
apart, having changed his direction a little towards the Amphion. Thus
we were in an agony: had some hint or information reached them, upon
which they were questioning Theocritus? In the meanwhile Phyllidas, whom
you know, Archidamus, and who was at that time acting as clerk to
Archias and the Polemarchs, and knew of the expected arrival of the
exiles,[26] being privy to our scheme, pressed my hand as it was his way
to do, and went on with bantering talk for every one’s benefit, about
the gymnasia and the wrestling; then, having drawn me some distance from
the others, he began to ask me about the exiles, and whether [Sidenote:
C] they were keeping to their day. When I said that they were, he
continued: ‘Then I have done right in preparing for to-day the party at
which I mean to entertain Archias, and to deliver him into their hand in
his cups.’ ‘Better than right, Phyllidas!’ I said; ‘and do you try to
collect all or as many as you can of our enemies to the same place.’
‘That is not easy;’ said he, ‘indeed, it is impossible; for Archias,
expecting that a certain lady of high rank will come there to meet him,
does not wish Leontides to be present. We must therefore mark [Sidenote:
D] them down to separate houses. If Archias and Leontides are once
captured, I think that the others will take themselves off, or else will
remain quiet, glad to close with any offer of safety.’ ‘We will do so,’
I said, ‘but what can Theocritus have to talk about with these people?’
‘I cannot answer clearly or from knowledge,’ said Phyllidas, ‘but I
heard portents mentioned and prophecies disastrous to Sparta.’
[27][Meanwhile Theocritus rejoined us, and] Pheidolaus of Haliartus came
up and said, ‘Simmias wants you to wait hereabouts a little. He is
closeted with Leontides, interceding for Amphitheus to get his sentence
of death commuted, if possible, to exile.’
V. ‘The very man!’ said Theocritus. ‘You might [Sidenote: E] have come
on purpose, for I was longing to hear what the discoveries were, and
about the general appearance of the tomb of Alcmena in your country when
it was opened, if you were really present yourself when Agesilaus sent
and removed the remains to Sparta.’ Pheidolaus answered: ‘I was not
present; and vexed and indignant I was with my citizens for leaving me
out. However, no vestige of a body was found, only a bracelet of brass,
not a large one, and two earthenware jars containing [Sidenote: F] earth
which had become solid as stone. Above the tomb lay a brass plate, with
many letters wonderful for their great antiquity; they afforded no
intelligible sense, though they came out clear to the eye when the brass
was washed. The characters were of a peculiar and barbaric type, most
closely resembling the Egyptian; and Agesilaus accordingly, as they
said, sent copies to the king of Egypt, asking him to show them to the
priests, on the chance of their understanding them. However, Simmias
may, perhaps, have something to tell you about all this, as he was at
that time in Egypt, and philosophy [Sidenote: 578] brought him much into
the society of the priests. But the people of Haliartus believe that the
great scarcity of crops and the advance of the lake were not accidental,
but were an angry visitation because they allowed the tomb to be dug
open.’ After a short pause Theocritus went on: ‘Nor yet are the
Lacedaemonians themselves clear of the wrath of heaven, as is shown by
the portents about which Lysanoridas was lately conferring with us. He
is now off to Haliartus to fill in the [Sidenote: B] tomb again and to
offer libations to Alcmena and Aleus, of course in accordance with some
oracle, not knowing who Aleus was. When he comes back from there he
intends to investigate the tomb of Dirce, which is unknown to the
Thebans, except those who have acted as Hipparchs. The outgoing
magistrate takes his successor in office, with no one else present, and
shows it him at night; they perform certain fireless rites over the
tomb, carefully obliterate all traces, and go off under cover of
darkness by separate ways. And much chance, I think, they will have of
finding it, Pheidolaus! For most of those who have served legally as
Hipparchs are now in exile; I might say all, except [Sidenote: C]
Gorgidas and Plato, whom they fear too much to examine. But the present
magistrates receive the spear and the seal in the Cadmeia, and know
absolutely nothing.’
VI. While Theocritus was saying this, Leontides was going out with his
friends. We entered, and began to pay our compliments to Simmias, who
was sitting on the couch, having been unsuccessful in his petition, I
think, for he seemed wrapped in thought and much annoyed. Looking hard
at us all, ‘Hercules!’ [Sidenote: D] he said, ‘what savage barbarous
manners! How right, and more than right, old Thales was, when he came
home from a long absence abroad, and his friends asked what was his
rarest discovery, “An aged tyrant”, he said! For every one, even if he
have not been personally wronged, is disgusted at mere oppression, and
harshness, and so is an enemy to lawless irresponsible dynasties. Well,
the God will see to this, perhaps; now, Capheisias, about your newcomer,
do you know who he is?’ ‘I do not know’, said I, ‘whom you mean.’ ‘Yet
Leontides tells us’, he said, ‘that a man has been seen by the tomb of
Lysis, rising to go when night was done. His retinue and [Sidenote: E]
equipment were stately. He had bivouacked there on a rough bed, for
piles of agnus castus and tamarisk were visible, and also remains of
burnt sacrifices and libations of milk. At dawn he asked those who met
him whether he should find the sons of Polymnis in the country.’ ‘But
who can the stranger be?’ I said; ‘from what you tell us it must be some
uncommon person, one in no private station.’
VII. ‘Certainly not’, said Pheidolaus. ‘However, when he comes we will
see to his reception. Now, as to those characters, Simmias, about which
we were puzzling just now. If you know more than we do, tell us; for it
is said that the Egyptian priests have made out the letters on the plate
which Agesilaus [Sidenote: F] took from us when he opened the tomb of
Alcmena.’ Simmias remembered at once. ‘I know nothing of that plate,
Pheidolaus;’ he said, ‘but Agenoridas the Spartan brought a number of
characters from Agesilaus to Memphis, to Chonuphis the prophet, with
whom Plato and I and Hellopion of Peparethus were staying to enjoy
Philosophy together. He had been sent by the king, who desired
Chonuphis, if he could make anything out of the inscription, to
interpret and return it quickly. After spending three days in
retirement, reading up characters from all countries in ancient books,
he wrote his answer to the king. [Sidenote: 579] He explained to us that
this inscription directs the holding of a competition in honour of the
Muses. The characters belonged to the system of the reign of Proteus,
the one learnt by Hercules the son of Amphitryon. The God therein
directs and charges the Greeks to observe a time of peace and leisure,
spending it in continuous philosophical debate, with the help of the
Muses and of Reason, for the decision of points relating to Justice, all
arms being laid aside. We thought at the time that what Chonuphis said
was good, and we thought so still more when, in our journey from Egypt
round Caria, we met certain Delians [Sidenote: B] who begged Plato, as a
geometrician, to solve the problem propounded in a mysterious oracle of
the God. The oracle was this: “The Delians and the other Greeks shall
have respite from their present ills when they have doubled the altar at
Delos.” The Delians were unable to guess the meaning, and, moreover, had
brought themselves into a ludicrous difficulty about the construction of
the altar. They had doubled each of the four sides,[28] and so
unconsciously produced a solid figure eight times greater than the
original, in ignorance of the factor which must be applied to the side,
in order to double the solid. [Sidenote: C] So they appealed to Plato
for help in the difficulty. Plato, remembering the Egyptian, said that
the God was rallying the Greeks on their neglect of liberal studies,
mocking our ignorance, and commanding us to take up geometry in real
earnest; that it required no slight or dim-sighted intellect, but a
first-rate training in linear geometry, to find two mean proportionals,
the only method by which a solid in the form of a cube can be doubled,
if all its dimensions are to be increased uniformly. Eudoxus of Cnidos,
he said, or Helicon of Cyzicus, would work this out for them.[29]
However, in his opinion, the God did not desire this; he was enjoining
all the Greeks to cease from war [Sidenote: D] and trouble and devote
themselves to the Muses, to soften their passions by discussions and
Mathematics, and to associate profitably with one another.’
VIII. While Simmias was speaking, our father Polymnis came in upon us.
He sat down by Simmias and said: ‘Epaminondas invites you and all
present, if you have no more pressing engagement, to wait hereabouts; he
wants to introduce to you the stranger, a man noble himself, and brought
here by a noble and generous errand. He comes from the Pythagoreans of
[Sidenote: E] Italy, to pour offerings on the tomb of old Lysis, in
accordance, as he says, with certain dreams and clear visions. He brings
a large sum in gold, thinking that Epaminondas ought to be reimbursed
for the care of Lysis in his old age, and on this he insists most
keenly, though we neither ask nor wish assistance for our poverty.’
Simmias was pleased: ‘A really wonderful man,’ he said, ‘and worthy of
Philosophy; but what is the reason that he has not come straight to us?’
‘He passed the night, I think,’ said he, ‘near the tomb of Lysis;
Epaminondas [Sidenote: F] was to take him on to the Ismenus to bathe,
and then they will come on to us here. Before he met us, he had made his
night’s lodging near the tomb, intending to take up the remains and
convey them to Italy, unless prevented by some divine warning in the
night.’ Having said this, my father was silent.
IX. Then Galaxidorus spoke: ‘Hercules! how hard it is to find a man
quite free from vanity and superstition! Some are caught by these
weaknesses against their will, owing to want of experience or of
strength. Others, in order to appear singular and to be taken for
friends of the Gods, bring the divine into all they do, making dreams
and portents and such stuff a pretext for anything that enters their
head. Now, to men in public [Sidenote: 580] stations, who are compelled
to adapt their lives to a self-willed and petulant multitude, this may
have its advantage; superstition is a bit wherewith to check a populace,
and direct it to what is expedient. But to Philosophy such posturing is
unbecoming in itself, and, moreover, it contradicts her professions; she
undertakes to teach all that is good and expedient by the reason, and
then, as though in despite of reason, goes back upon the Gods and away
from the first principles of action; and, dishonouring demonstration, in
which her own excellence is supposed to lie, turns to prophecies and
visions seen in dreams, [Sidenote: B] things in which the weakest often
have as great success as the strongest. This, I think, Simmias, is why
your Socrates embraced a system of intellectual training which bore a
more philosophical stamp, choosing that simple artless type as being
liberal and most friendly to truth; and casting to the winds for the
sophists, as a mere smoke from Philosophy, all pretentious nonsense.’
Theocritus broke in: ‘What, Galaxidorus, and has Meletus persuaded even
you too that Socrates despised [Sidenote: C] what was divine, for that
was the charge which he actually brought before the Athenians?’ ‘What
was divine—no;’ he said, ‘but he received Philosophy from Pythagoras and
Empedocles full of visions and myths and superstitions, and deeply
dipped in mysteries; and trained her to look at facts, and be sensible,
and pursue truth in soberness of reason.’
X. ‘Granted;’ said Theocritus, ‘but as to the Divine Sign of Socrates,
good friend, are we to call it a falsity or what? To me, nothing
recorded about Pythagoras seems to go so far towards the prophetic and
divine. For, in plain words, as Homer has drawn Athena to Odysseus
_In all his toils a presence and a stay_,[30]
even so, apparently, did the spirit attach to Socrates, from the first,
a sort of vision to go before and guide his steps in life, which alone
_Passing before him shed a light around_[31]
[Sidenote: D] in matters of uncertainty, too hard for the wit of man to
solve; upon these the spirit used often to converse with him, adding a
divine touch to his own resolutions. For more, and more important,
instances you must ask Simmias and the other companions of Socrates. But
I was myself present, having come to stay with Euthyphron the prophet,
when Socrates, as you remember, Simmias, was going up to the Symbolum
and the house of Andocides, asking some question as he walked and
playfully cross-examining Euthyphron. Suddenly he stopped and closed his
lips tightly[32] and was wrapt in thought for some time. Then he turned
back and took the way through the [Sidenote: E] Trunkmakers’ Street, and
tried to recall those of our friends who were already in advance, saying
that the Sign was upon him. Most of them turned in a body, amongst whom
was I, keeping close to Euthyphron. But some young members of the party,
no doubt to put the Sign of Socrates to the test, held on, and drew into
their number Charillus the flute-player, who had come to Athens with
myself, staying with Cebes. Now as they were going through the street of
the Statuaries near the Law Courts, they were met by a whole herd of
swine loaded with mud and hustling one another by press of numbers.
There was no [Sidenote: F] getting out of the way; on they charged,
upsetting some, bespattering others. At any rate, Charillus came home
with his clothes full of mud and his legs too, so that we always laugh
when we remember Socrates and his Sign, and wonder that this divine
presence of his should never fail him or forget.’
XI. Then Galaxidorus said: ‘Do you think then, Theocritus, that the Sign
of Socrates possessed a special and extraordinary power, not that some
fragment of the ready wit which we all share determined him by an
empiric process, turning the scale of his reasoning in cases which were
uncertain and incalculable? For as a single weight does not by itself
incline the balance, but, if added to one scale when the weights are
even, sinks the whole of that one on its own side, so [Sidenote: 581] a
cry, or any such feather-weight sign, will fit[33] a mind already
weighted, and draw it into action; and when two trains of thought are in
conflict, it reinforces one, and solves the difficulty by removing the
equality, so that there is a movement and an inclination.’ My father
broke in: ‘Well, but I have myself heard, Galaxidorus, from a certain
Megarian, who had it from Terpsion, that the Sign of Socrates was a
sneeze, proceeding either from himself or from other persons; if some
one else sneezed on his [Sidenote: B] right, whether behind or in front,
it encouraged him to the action; if on the left, it warned him off it.
Of his own sneezings there was one kind which confirmed his purpose when
he was still intending to act; another stopped him when he was already
acting and checked his impulse. The wonder to me is that if he made use
of a sneeze he did not so call it to his companions, but was in the
habit of saying that what checked or commanded him was a Divine Sign.
For that would be like vanity and idle boasting, not like truth and
simplicity, in which lay, as we suppose, his greatness and his
superiority to men in general, to be disturbed by a sound from outside
or a casual sneeze, and so be diverted from acting, and give up what he
had resolved. [Sidenote: C] Now the impulses of Socrates, on the other
hand, show firmness and intensity in every direction, as though issuing
from a right and powerful judgement and principle. Thus for a man to
remain in voluntary poverty all his life, when he might have had plenty,
and the givers would have been pleased and thankful, and never to swerve
from Philosophy in the face of all those hindrances; and at last, when
the zeal and ingenuity of his friends had made his way easy to safety
and retreat, not to be bent by their entreaties, nor yield to the near
approach of [Sidenote: D] death—all this is not like a man whose
judgement might be changed by random voices or sneezings; it is like one
led to what is noble by some greater and more sovereign authority. I
hear also that he foretold to some of his friends the disaster which
befell the power of Athens in Sicily. At a still earlier time,
Pyrilampes, the son of Antiphon, when taken prisoner in the pursuit near
Delium, after having received from us a javelin wound, as soon as he had
heard from those who had arrived from Athens to arrange the truce that
Socrates had returned home in safety by The Gullies[34] with Alcibiades
and Laches, often called upon him by name, and often on friends and
comrades of [Sidenote: E] his own who had fled with him by way of
Parnes, and been slain by our cavalry; they had disobeyed the Sign of
Socrates, he said, in turning from the battle by a different way instead
of following his lead. This, I think, Simmias too must have heard.’
‘Often,’ said Simmias, ‘and from many persons. For there was no little
noise at Athens about the Sign of Socrates in consequence.’
XII. ‘Well, then, Simmias,’ said Pheidolaus, ‘are we to allow
Galaxidorus in his jesting way to bring down this great fact of
divination to sneezings and cries, which plenty of common [Sidenote: F]
ignorant persons apply to trifles in mere sport, whereas, when grave
dangers overtake them, or more serious business, we may quote
Euripides:[35]
_These follies have a truce when steel is near_‘?
Galaxidorus said: ‘I am quite ready to listen to Simmias on this
subject, Pheidolaus, if he has himself heard Socrates speak about it,
and to join you in believing; but as for all that you and Polymnis have
mentioned, it is not hard to refute it. For as in medicine a throb or a
pimple is a small matter, but is the indication of what is not small;
and as to a pilot the cry of a bird from the open sea, or the scudding
of a thin film of cloud, [Sidenote: 582] signifies wind and rougher
seas, so to a prophetic soul a sneeze or a voice is nothing great in
itself, but is the sign of a great conjuncture. There is no art in which
it is thought contemptible to forecast great things by small, many
things through few. Suppose a man ignorant of the meaning of letters
were to see a few insignificant-looking characters, and to refuse to
believe that one who knew grammar could, by their help, repeat the story
of great wars between old-world peoples, and foundings of cities, and
what kings did or suffered, and then were to say [Sidenote: B] that a
voice, or something like a voice, revealed and repeated each of these
things to that historian, a pleasant laugh would come over your face, my
friend, at the ignorance of that man. Now, consider, may it not be so
with us? In our ignorance of the meaning of different things by which
the prophetic art hits the coming event, are we simple enough to rebel
if a man of intellect uses them to reveal something not yet evident, and
says, moreover, that a Divine Sign, not a sneeze or a voice, directs him
to the facts? For now I turn to you, Polymnis, who wonder that Socrates,
a man who did so very much to make Philosophy human by simplicity and
absence of cant, should [Sidenote: C] have named his Sign, not a sneeze
or a voice, but, in full tragic phrase, his Divine Sign. I, on the
contrary, should be surprised if a man so excellent in Dialectic and
mastery of terms had said that the sneeze and not the Divine Sign gave
him the intimation. As if a man were to say that he had been wounded “by
the javelin”, not “by the thrower with his javelin”, or, again, that the
weight had been measured “by the balance”, not “by the weigher with his
balance”. For the work is not the work of the tool but of the owner of
the tool which he uses for the work; and the Sign is a kind of tool used
by the signifying power. But, as I said, if Simmias should have anything
to tell us we must listen, for his knowledge is more exact.’
XIII. Then Theocritus said: ‘Yes, but first let us see [Sidenote: D] who
these persons are who are coming in; or, rather, it is surely
Epaminondas bringing the stranger to us.’ We looked towards the doors,
and saw Epaminondas leading the way, then Ismenidorus, Bacchylidas, and
Melissus the flute-player, all of them our friends and confederates;
then the stranger followed, a man of much nobility of mien, but with a
gentle and kindly character apparent beneath it, and dressed in a grave
fashion. He took his seat by Simmias, my brother next to me, and the
rest as they found places. Then, when there was silence, Simmias called
on my brother: ‘Well, Epaminondas, how are we to address our friend? Who
and what is he, and [Sidenote: E] whence? That is the usual formula for
beginning an introduction and an acquaintance.’[36] Epaminondas replied:
‘Theanor is his name, Simmias, and his family is of Crotona, where he
belongs to the local school of Philosophy and does no discredit to the
great fame of Pythagoras; he has just taken the long journey from Italy
here, to confirm noble doctrines by noble acts.’ The stranger broke in:
‘Indeed, Epaminondas, you are now hindering the noblest of all actions.
For if to confer a benefit on friends be noble, it is no shame to
receive [Sidenote: F] one from them. A favour needs one to receive, no
less than one to bestow it; both must join to ensure a noble result. It
is like a ball well delivered; to allow it to drop idle to the ground is
to shame it. Now what mark is there for a ball, so agreeable for the
thrower to hit and so distressing to miss, as a man at whom one aims a
favour when he well deserves it? But in the one case the mark stands
still, and he who misses has himself to thank; in the other, he who
excuses himself and swerves aside does a wrong to the favour which never
reaches its goal. You have yourself heard fully from me the reasons of
my voyage here; but I should like to go through the story [Sidenote:
583] as fully to those now present, and let them be judges between us.
‘When the Pythagoreans had been overpowered by faction in the different
cities, and their brotherhoods expelled, and when the party of Cylon had
piled up a fire round a house in Metapontum in which those still settled
there were holding a meeting, and had dispatched all those in the place
except Philolaus and Lysis, who were still young, and were strong enough
and active enough to push through the fire, Philolaus escaped thence to
Lucania and joined in safety the rest of our friends, who were by this
time rallying and holding their own against the Cylonians. Where Lysis
was, no one knew for a long time; however, Gorgias of Leontini, sailing
back from [Sidenote: B] Greece to Sicily, brought certain news to
Arcesus and his friends that he had met Lysis, who was staying near
Thebes. Arcesus longed to see the man, and was eager to sail straight
off himself; but being quite disabled by age and infirmity, gave orders
to bring Lysis alive to Italy if possible, or his remains if he should
have died. Then came wars, revolutions, and periods of tyranny which
made it impossible for the friends to perform the task in his lifetime.
But when the spirit of Lysis, now dead, had shown us clearly of his end,
and well informed persons told us of all the care and entertainment
which he had [Sidenote: C] received from your family, Polymnis; how
richly his age had been cared for in a poor house, and how he had been
adopted as father to your sons before his blessed end came, I was sent
out, a young man and alone, to represent many of my elders who have
money and wish to offer it to those who have not, in return for favour
and friendship richly bestowed. Lysis lies where you have honourably
laid him; yet the honour of that tomb is greater when recompense is made
for it to friends by friends dear and close.’
XIV. While the stranger was speaking thus, my father wept a long while
over the memory of Lysis, but my brother [Sidenote: D] with his usual
gentle smile said to me: ‘What is it to be, Capheisias? Are we to
surrender poverty to riches, and to say nothing?’ ‘No! no!’ said I, ‘the
dear “good nurse of young manhood”[37]—to her rescue! it is your turn to
speak.’ ‘See, father;’ he said, ‘that was the only side on which I used
to fear that our house might be captured by money. I mean through
Capheisias and his person, which needs beautiful clothes that he may
make a brave show before all his admiring friends, and needs food of the
best, and plenty of it, that he may have strength for the gymnasia and
wrestling matches. Now that he does not betray poverty, or throw off our
ancestral poverty like a coat of paint, but, boy though he is, goes
proudly [Sidenote: E] in thrift, and is content with what we have, to
what possible use could we put money? Shall we plate our armour, say,
with gold, and make the shield gay with purple and gold together, as
Nicias of Athens did?[38] Shall we buy you, father, a Milesian cloak, or
a dress with a purple border for mother? You know, we are not likely to
spend the present on our table, or to feast ourselves more sumptuously,
as having admitted a guest of such importance as wealth.’ ‘Away with it,
boy!’ said my father, ‘never may I see our life new-modelled like that!’
[Sidenote: F] ‘No,’ my brother went on, ‘nor will we sit idle at home
and guard our wealth; that would be a “boonless boon”[39] indeed, and a
getting with no honour to it.’ ‘Of course’, said our father. ‘You know,’
Epaminondas went on, ‘when Jason, the Thessalian Tagus, lately sent a
large sum of money here to us and begged us to take it, he thought me
something of a boor when I answered that he was making the first move in
wrong and robbery, when a lover of monarchy like himself tempted with
money a private citizen of a free self-governed state. From you, Sir, I
accept your generous intention, and admire it [Sidenote: 584] more than
I can say; it is beautiful and philosophical too; but you are bringing
medicines to friends who are not sick! Suppose that you had heard that
we were attacked in war, and had sailed with arms and ammunition to help
us, and on arrival had found that all was friendliness and peace; you
would not think it necessary to hand over the stores and leave them
where they were not needed. Even so, you have come to be our ally
against poverty, thinking that we were pinched by her, but there is none
so easy to be endured as she, our dear fellow-lodger. [Sidenote: B] So
no need for money or arms against her who vexes us not. Take back this
message to your brotherhood: that they themselves use their wealth most
nobly, but that there are friends here who make noble use of poverty:
and that, as to the entertainment of Lysis and his burial, Lysis has
paid the score in full for himself, not least by teaching us not to fret
at poverty.’
XV. Theanor broke in: ‘Then, if it is ignoble to fret at poverty, is it
not eccentric to fear and shun wealth?’ ‘Eccentric it is if it is
rejected on no rational grounds, but in order to pose or because of
insipid taste or affectation of some kind.’ ‘But what rational grounds’,
he said, ‘could bar the getting of wealth by good and honest means,
Epaminondas? Or rather—and surrender more gently than you did to the
Thessalian in [Sidenote: C] answering our questions about these
matters—tell me whether you think that the giving of money may sometimes
be right, but the receiving never; or that givers and receivers alike
are in all cases wrong?’ ‘No, no!’ said Epaminondas, ‘I hold that, as
with everything else, so with wealth; there is a giving and a getting
which are ugly, and a giving and a getting which are fine.’ ‘Then,’ said
Theanor, ‘when a man gives readily and heartily what he owes, is not
that beautiful?’ He assented. ‘But when one receives what another
beautifully gives, is not the taking beautiful? Or could there be a
fairer taking of [Sidenote: D] money than when it comes from one who
gives fairly?’ ‘There could not’, he said. ‘Then of two friends,
Epaminondas,’ said he, ‘if one is to give, it looks as if the other must
take. For in battles one must swerve away from a marksman in the enemy’s
ranks; in the conflict of benefits it is not fair to avoid or thrust
aside the friend who nobly gives. For, if poverty is no affliction, yet
wealth, on its side, is not a thing to be flouted and refused like
that.’ ‘It is not,’ said Epaminondas, ‘but there is a case where the
gift which may be nobly offered remains more honoured and more noble if
it is refused. Look at it with us in this way: you will allow that there
are many desires, and desires of many things; some inborn, as we call
them, which grow up about the body and are directed towards its
necessary pleasures; others adventitious, grounded on mere fancies, but
[Sidenote: E] gaining strength and power by time and use, where there is
vicious education, and often dragging down the soul more forcibly than
do those which are necessary. Now, by habits and training, men have
before now succeeded in drawing off and subjecting to reason, in great
measure, the innate affections. But the whole force of discipline, my
friend, must be brought to bear against those which are adventitious and
extraordinary; we must work them out, and hack them off, and use
restraints and checks to school them to reason. For if thirst and hunger
are forced out by rational resistance in the matter of food and
[Sidenote: F] drink, far easier surely is it to stunt, and in the end to
annihilate, love of wealth and love of glory by refusing and prohibiting
the things at which they aim. Do you not agree?’ The stranger assented.
‘Then, do you see a distinction’, Epaminondas went on, ‘between training
and the intended result of the training? Thus the result of athletic
exercise would be the contest against a competitor for the crown;
training would be the preparation of the body for this contest of the
gymnasia. So with virtue, do you allow that there are two things, the
result and the training?’ The stranger assented. ‘Now then,’ Epaminondas
resumed, ‘tell me first with respect to temperance; do you take
abstinence from base and lawless pleasures [Sidenote: 585] to be a
training, or rather a result and a proof of training?’ ‘A result and a
proof’, he said. ‘But it is a training or study in temperance—is it
not?—which still draws all of you on when you go to the gymnasia and
have stirred up your desires for food, as though they were wild beasts,
and then stand for a long time over bright tables with a variety of
dishes, and at last pass the good cheer for your servants to enjoy,
offering to your own now chastened appetites only what is plain and
simple, since abstinence from pleasures in things allowed is a training
for the soul against pleasures which are forbidden?’ ‘No doubt’, he
said. ‘Then there is, friend, a way of training ourselves for [Sidenote:
B] justice against the love of wealth and money; I do not mean never to
enter our neighbour’s premises by night and steal his goods, and never
to take his clothes at the bath; nor yet if a man does not betray
country and friends for money is he training himself against
covetousness (since here, perhaps, the law comes in and fear, to hinder
greediness from doing acts of wrong). No, the man who often and
voluntarily sets himself aloof from gains which are just and are allowed
by law is training and habituating himself in advance to keep his
distance from every gain which is unrighteous and forbidden. For as,
when it encounters great pleasures which are also strange and hurtful,
the mind cannot avoid a flutter unless it has often despised [Sidenote:
C] permitted enjoyments, so to pass by vicious gains and great
advancement when they come within reach is not easy, unless from a great
way off the love of gain has been fettered and chastened; whereas, if it
has been brought up to gain, and there has been no check on its license,
it makes a riotous growth towards all iniquity, and only with the
greatest effort is it withheld from grasping an advantage. But if a man
does not surrender himself to the favours of friends or to the bounties
of kings, but has said no even to an inheritance which Fortune offers,
and has put far off that love of wealth which springs up to meet a
treasure as it comes into sight, he finds that covetousness rises up
against him no longer, nor tempts him to what is wrong, nor disturbs his
understanding. He is gentle, and possesses himself for noble uses; he
has great thoughts and [Sidenote: D] shares with his soul the noblest
secrets. We, Capheisias and I, are lovers of such men, dear Simmias, and
we entreat the stranger to allow us so to train ourselves in poverty
that we may reach virtue such as that.’
XVI. My brother finished his argument, and then Simmias nodded his head
two or three times. ‘A great man,’ he said, ‘a great man is Epaminondas,
and thanks to Polymnis here for that, who procured for his sons from the
first the best training in Philosophy. However, with regard to this
question, Sir, do you and they settle it between you. Now about Lysis,
if we [Sidenote: E] may be allowed to hear. Do you mean to move him from
his tomb and to transfer him to Italy; or will you allow him to remain
here with us, where he shall find kind and friendly fellow-lodgers when
our time comes?’ Theanor smiled on him: ‘Lysis appears, Simmias, to love
this country, in which by the good offices of Epaminondas he has wanted
nothing that is honourable. For there is a certain holy rite connected
with our Pythagorean burials, which if we lack we do not seem to attain
our full and blessed consummation. So when we knew from dreams of the
death of Lysis (we distinguish by a certain sign which is revealed in
sleep whether an appearance belongs [Sidenote: F] to a dead person or a
living), this thought came over many of us: so Lysis has been buried in
another land with strange rites; he must be moved here to us, that he
may share in all that is customary. Coming with such an intention, and
guided straight to the tomb by people of the place, I was pouring
libations just at evening time, and calling on the soul of Lysis to
return and declare solemnly how we ought to act. The night went on and I
saw nothing, but thought I heard a voice: “Stir not what is best
unstirred; the body of Lysis has been buried with holy rites by friends;
his soul has already been parted from it and dismissed to another birth,
with another spirit for its partner.” Accordingly, when I met
Epaminondas at dawn [Sidenote: 586] and heard the manner in which he
buried Lysis, I recognized that he had been well trained by that great
teacher, even to the rules which must not be spoken, and had enjoyed the
guidance in life from the same spirit as he, unless I fail to guess the
pilot aright from the course steered. For “wide are the tracks”[40] of
our lives, and few there are of them by which the spirits lead men.’
When Theanor had said this, he looked closely at Epaminondas, as though
scrutinizing him afresh without and within.
[Sidenote: B] XVII. In the meantime the surgeon came up and loosened
Simmias’ bandage, intending to dress the limb. But Phyllidas came in
upon us with Hippostheneidas, and bidding me, and also Charon and
Theocritus, rise and follow him, led us to a corner of the colonnade,
his face showing great agitation. To my question, ‘Any news, Phyllidas?’
he answered, ‘No news to me; I knew and told you all the time how weak
Hippostheneidas was, and implored you not to admit him as an associate
of our enterprise.’ We were dismayed at this, and Hippostheneidas said:
‘In Heaven’s name, Phyllidas, do not say that; do not take rashness to
be courage, and thereby ruin us and the city too; [Sidenote: C] but
allow the men to make their own return in safety if it is so appointed.’
Phyllidas was nettled: ‘Tell me, Hippostheneidas,’ he said, ‘how many do
you think share the inner secrets of our plan?’ ‘Not less than thirty,
to my knowledge’, he said. ‘Very well,’ said Phyllidas, ‘there is all
that number, and you have taken on your single self to annul and check
the plan on which all had resolved, you sent a mounted messenger to the
men when already on their road, bidding them turn back and not press on
to-day, when most of the arrangements for their return have settled
themselves without us.’ When Phyllidas had said this we were all much
disturbed, but Charon fastened [Sidenote: D] his eyes very severely on
Hippostheneidas: ‘Villain!’ he said, ‘what have you done to us?’
‘Nothing terrible,’ answered Hippostheneidas, ‘if you will drop your
harsh tone and listen to the calculations of a man of your own age, with
grey hairs like yourself. If we have resolved to give our countrymen an
exhibition of a courage which loves danger, and a spirit which makes
little of life, then there is much of the day still before us,
Phyllidas; let us not wait for the evening, but march at once against
the tyrants, our swords in our hands—let us slay, let us die, let us
never spare ourselves! But say we find no difficulty in this, whether of
action or of endurance, yet to rescue Thebes [Sidenote: E] from an armed
force, when encompassed by so many enemies, and to expel the Spartan
garrison at a cost of two or three lives, is not easy; for Phyllidas has
never prepared so much strong liquor for his parties and receptions that
all the fifteen hundred men of Archias’ bodyguard will be made drunk;
yet, even if we get rid of him, Herippidas is on for night duty and
sober, and Arcesus too. This being so, why hurry to bring home friends
and relatives to manifest destruction, and that when the very fact of
their return is not unknown to the enemy? Or why have [Sidenote: F] the
Thespians been ordered to be under arms for these two days past, and
ready whenever the Spartan officers call? Again, I hear that Amphitheus
is to be examined and put to death to-day, whenever Archias returns. Are
not these strong signs that our action is not unmarked? Is it not best
to pause, not for a long time, but long enough to make the auspices
right? For the prophets declare, that in sacrificing the ox to Demeter,
they found that the entrails prognosticated much commotion and public
danger. Again, and this needs the greatest caution on your part, Charon,
yesterday Hypatodorus son of Erianthes walked back with me from the
farm, quite a good and friendly [Sidenote: 587] person, but certainly
not in our secrets. “Charon is your friend, Hippostheneidas,” he said,
“but I do not know him well; tell him, if you think good, to be on his
guard against a certain danger revealed in a very strange and
disagreeable dream. Last night I thought that his house was in pangs as
of labour, and that he and the friends who shared his anxiety prayed and
stood around it, while it moaned and uttered inarticulate sounds. At
last the fire flared out strong and terrible from within, so that most
of the city was caught by the blaze, but the Cadmeia was only wrapped in
smoke, the fire not spreading [Sidenote: B] up to it.” The vision which
the man described was something like this, Charon; I was alarmed at the
time, and much more so when I heard to-day that the exiles are to be put
up at your house; I am now in an agony lest we may be bringing a load of
troubles upon ourselves, yet not doing any harm worth mentioning to the
enemies, but simply stirring them up. For I reckon the city to be on our
side, the Cadmeia with them, as it certainly is.’
XVIII. Theocritus broke in, stopping Charon who wanted to say something
to Hippostheneidas: ‘Well, Hippostheneidas, [Sidenote: C] nothing has
ever struck me as so encouraging for action (although I have myself
always found my sacrifices favourable for the exiles), as this vision;
strong, clear light over the city, rising, you tell us, out of a
friendly house; the head-quarters of our enemies wrapped in black smoke,
which always imports, at the best, tears and confusion; then
inarticulate utterances proceeding from our side, so that, even if any
one were to attempt to inform against us, only an indistinct rumour and
blind suspicion can attach to our enterprise, which will have succeeded
by the time it is evident. That the priests should find sacrifices
unfavourable is natural; officials and victim belong to those in power,
not to the people.’ While Theocritus was still speaking, I turned to
Hippostheneidas: ‘What messenger did you send [Sidenote: D] out to them?
Unless you have allowed a very long start we will give chase.’ ‘I do not
know,’ he said, ‘for I must tell you the truth, Capheisias, whether you
could possibly overtake the man; he has the best horse in Thebes. The
man is known to you; he is head groom in Melon’s chariot stables, and
through Melon knows our enterprise from its beginning.’ Meanwhile I had
espied the man, and said, ‘Hippostheneidas, do you not mean Chlidon, who
won the single-horse race in last year’s Heraea?’ ‘That is the man’, he
said. ‘And who is that,’ I said, ‘standing this long time at the outer
gates, and looking in at us?’ Then Hippostheneidas turned: ‘Chlidon,’ he
[Sidenote: E] said, ‘yes, by Hercules, I fear something has gone very
wrong.’ Meanwhile, the man saw that we were observing him, and drew up
quietly from the door. Hippostheneidas gave him a nod and bade him speak
out to all present. ‘I know these gentlemen, Hippostheneidas, perfectly
well; and finding you neither at home nor in the market-place, I guessed
that you had come to them, so I took the shortest way here, that you may
all know [Sidenote: F] everything which has happened. When you ordered
me to use all speed and meet the party in the hill country, I went home
to get my horse; but when I asked for the bridle, my wife could not give
it me, but stayed a long time in the store room. She searched and turned
out everything inside, and after fooling me to her heart’s content, at
last confessed that she had lent the bridle to our neighbour the evening
before, his wife having come in to ask for one. I was angry and used
strong words to her, upon which she took to horrible imprecations—“A bad
journey [Sidenote: 588] and a bad return to you all!” May Heaven throw
it all back upon herself, by Zeus, yes! At last, in my anger, I got as
far as blows; then a crowd of neighbours and women ran up; I have
behaved shamefully and have been treated no better, and have just
managed to make my way to you, that you may send some one else to the
exiles, for I am fairly off my head by this time and feel badly upset.’
XIX. We now experienced a strange revulsion of feeling. A little before
we were chafing at the check we had received; now that the crisis was
upon us short and sharp, and no delay possible, we found ourselves
passing into an anguish of alarm. However, I said a word of greeting and
encouragement to Hippostheneidas, to the effect that the very Gods were
calling us [Sidenote: B] on to action. After this Phyllidas went out to
arrange for his party, and to get Archias plunged straight into his
drink, Charon to see to his house, while Theocritus and I returned to
Simmias on the chance of getting a word with Epaminondas.
XX. However, they were far on in an inquiry of no mean import, Heaven
knows, but one which Galaxidorus and Pheidolaus had started a little
earlier, the problem of the real nature [Sidenote: C] and potency of the
Divine Sign of Socrates, so called. What Simmias said in reply to the
argument of Galaxidorus we did not hear; but he went on to say that he
had himself once asked Socrates on the subject, and failed to get an
answer, and so had never asked again; but that he had often been with
him when he gave his opinion that those who claim intercourse with the
divine by way of vision are impostors, whereas he attended to those who
professed to hear a voice, and put serious questions to them. Hence it
began to occur to us, as we were discussing the matter among ourselves,
to suspect that the Divine Sign of Socrates might possibly be no vision
but a special sense for [Sidenote: D] sounds or words, with which he had
contact in some strange manner; just as in sleep there is no voice
heard, but fancies and notions as to particular words reach the
sleepers, who then think that they hear people talking. Only sleepers
receive such conceptions in a real dream because of the tranquillity and
calm of the body in sleep, whereas in waking moments the soul can hardly
attend to greater powers, being so choked by thronging emotions and
distracting needs that they are unable to listen and to give their
attention to clear revelations. But the mind of Socrates, pure and
passionless, and intermingling itself but [Sidenote: E] little with the
body for necessary purposes, was fine and light of touch, and quickly
changed under any impression. The impression we may conjecture to have
been no voice, but the utterance of a spirit, which without vocal sound
reached the perceiving mind by the revelation itself. For voice is like
a blow upon the soul, which perforce admits its utterance by way of the
ears, whenever we converse with one another. But the mind of a stronger
being leads the gifted soul, touching it with the thing thought, and no
blow is needed. To such a being soul yields as it relaxes or tightens
the impulses, which are never [Sidenote: F] violent, as when there are
passions to resist, but supple and pliant like reins which give. There
is nothing wonderful in this; as we see great cargo-vessels turned about
by little helms, and, again, potters’ wheels whirling round in even
revolution at the light touch of a hand. These are things without a soul
no doubt, yet so constructed as to run swiftly and smoothly, and
therefore to yield to a motive force when a touch is given. But the soul
of a man, being strained by countless impulses, as by cords, is far the
easiest of all machines to turn, if it be touched rationally; it accepts
the touch of thought, and moves as thought directs. For here the
passions and impulses are stretched towards the [Sidenote: 589] thinking
principle and end in it; if that principle be stirred they receive a
pull, and in turn draw and strain the man. And thus we are allowed to
learn how great is the power of a thought. For bones, which have no
sensation, and nerves and fleshy parts charged with humours, and the
whole resultant mass in its ponderous quiescence, do yet, as soon as the
soul sets something a going in thought and directs its impulse towards
it, rise up, alert and tense, a whole which moves to action in all its
members, as though it had wings. But it is hard, nay, perhaps,
altogether beyond our powers, to take in at one glance the [Sidenote: B]
system of excitation, complex strain, and divine prompting, whereby the
soul, after conceiving a thought, draws on the mass of the body by the
impulses which it gives.[41] Yet whereas a word thus intellectually
apprehended excites the soul, while no sort of voice is heard and no
action takes place, even so we need not, I think, find it hard to
believe that mind may be led by a stronger mind and a more divine soul
external to itself, having contact with it after its kind, as word with
word or light with reflection. For in actual fact we recognize the
thoughts of one another by groping as it were in darkness with the
assistance of voice; whereas the thoughts of spirits have light, they
shine upon men capable of receiving them, they need not verbs [Sidenote:
C] or nouns, those symbols whereby men in their intercourse with men see
resemblances and images of the things thought, yet never apprehend the
things themselves, save only those upon whom, as we have said, there
shines from within a peculiar and spiritual light. And yet what we see
happen in the case of the voice may partly reassure the incredulous. The
air is impressed with articulate sounds, it becomes all word and voice,
and brings the meaning home to the soul of the hearer. Therefore we need
not wonder if, in regard to this special mode of thought also, the air
is sensitive to the touch of higher beings, and is so modified as to
convey to the mind of godlike and extraordinary men the thought of him
who thought it. For as the strokes of miners[42] are caught on brazen
shields because of the reverberation, [Sidenote: D] when they rise from
below ground and fall upon them, whereas falling on any other surface
they are indistinct and pass to nothing, even so the words of spirits
pass through all Nature, but only sound for those who possess the soul
in untroubled calm, holy and spiritual men as we emphatically call them.
The view of most people is that spiritual visitations come to men in
sleep; that they should be similarly stirred when awake and in their
full faculties they think marvellous and beyond belief. As though a
musician were thought to use his lyre when the strings are let down, and
not to touch or use it when it is strung up and tuned! They do not see
the cause, their [Sidenote: E] own inner tunelessness and discord, from
which Socrates our friend had been set free, as the oracle given to his
father when he was yet a boy declared. For it bade him allow his son to
do whatever came into his mind; not to force nor direct his goings, but
to let his impulse have free play, only to pray for him to Zeus Agoraios
and to the Muses, but for all else not to meddle with Socrates; meaning
no doubt that he had within him a guide for [Sidenote: F] his life who
was better than ten thousand teachers and directors.
XXI. This, Pheidolaus, is what has occurred to me to think about the
Divine Sign of Socrates, in his lifetime and since his death, dismissing
with contempt those who have suggested voices or sneezings or anything
of that sort. But what I have heard Timarchus of Chaeroneia relate on
this head it may perhaps be better to pass over in silence, as more like
myth than history. ‘Not at all;’ said Theocritus, ‘let us have it all.
Even myth touches truth, not too closely, perhaps, but it does touch it
at points. But first, who was this Timarchus? Explain, for I do not know
him.’ ‘Naturally, Theocritus,’ [Sidenote: 590] said Simmias, ‘for he
died quite young, having begged that he might be buried near Lamprocles,
the son of Socrates, who had died a few days before, his own friend and
contemporary. He then greatly wished to know what was really meant by
the Divine Sign of Socrates, and so, like a generous youth fresh to the
taste of Philosophy, having taken no one but Cebes and myself into his
plan, went down into the cave of Trophonius, after performing the usual
rites of the oracle. Two nights and one day he remained below; and when
most people had given him up, and his family was mourning for [Sidenote:
B] him, at early dawn he came up very radiant. He knelt to the God, then
made his way at once through the crowd, and related to us many wonderful
things which he had seen and heard.
XXII. ‘He said that, when he descended into the oracular chamber, he
first found himself in a great darkness; then, after a prayer, lay a
long while not very clearly conscious whether he was awake or dreaming;
only he fancied that his head received a blow, while a dull noise fell
on his ears, and then the sutures parted and allowed his soul to issue
forth. As it passed upwards, rejoicing to mingle with the pure
transparent air, it appeared [Sidenote: C] first to draw a long deep
breath, after its narrow compression, and to become larger than before,
like a sail as it is filled out. Then he heard dimly a whirring noise
overhead out of which came a sweet voice. He looked up and saw land
nowhere, only islands shining with lambent fire, from time to time
changing colour with one another, as though it were a coat of dye, while
the light became spangled in the transition. They appeared to be
countless in number and in size enormous, not all equal but all alike
circular. He thought that as these moved around there was an answering
hum of the air, for the gentleness of [Sidenote: D] that voice which was
harmonized out of all corresponded to the smoothness of the motion.
Through the midst of the islands a sea or lake was interfused, all
shining with the colours as they were commingled over its grey surface.
Some few islands floated in a straight course and were conveyed across
the current; many others were drawn on by the flood, being almost
submerged. The sea was of great depth in some parts towards the south,
but [northwards[43]] there were very shallow reaches, and it often swept
over places and then left them dry, having no strong [Sidenote: E] ebb.
The colour was in places pure as that of the open sea, in others turbid
and marsh-like. As the islands passed through the surf they never came
round to their starting-point again or described a circle, but slightly
varied the points of impact, thus describing a continuous spiral as they
went round. The sea was inclined to the approximate middle and highest
part of the encompassing firmament by a little less than eight-ninths of
the whole, as it appeared to him. It had two openings which [Sidenote:
F] received rivers of fire pouring in from opposite sides, so that it
was lashed into foam, and its grey surface was turned to white. This he
saw, delighted at the spectacle; but as he turned his eyes downwards,
there appeared a chasm, vast and round as though hewn out of a sphere;
it was strangely terrible and deep and full of utter darkness, not in
repose but often agitated and surging up; from which were heard roarings
innumerable and groanings of beasts, and wailings of innumerable
infants, and with these mingled cries of men and women, dim sounds of
all sorts, and turmoils sent up indistinctly from the distant depth,
[Sidenote: 591] to his no small consternation. Time passed, and an
unseen person said to him, “Timarchus, what do you wish to learn?”
“Everything,” he replied, “for all is wonderful.” “We”, the voice said,
“have little to do with the regions above, they belong to other Gods;
but the province of Persephone which we administer, being one of the
four which Styx bounds, you may survey if you will.” To his question,
“What is Styx?” “A way to Hades,” was the reply, “and it passes right
opposite, parting the light at its very vertex, but reaching up, as you
see, from Hades below; where it touches the light in its revolution
[Sidenote: B] it marks off the remotest region of all. Now, there are
four first principles of all things, the first of life, the second of
motion, the third of birth, the fourth of death. The first is linked to
the second by Unity, in the Unseen: the second to the third by Mind, in
the sun: the third to the fourth by Nature, in the moon. Over each of
these combinations a Fate, daughter of Necessity, presides, and holds
the keys; of the first Atropus, of the second, Clotho, of the one
belonging to the moon Lachesis, and the turning-point of birth is there.
For the other islands contain Gods, but the moon, which belongs to
[Sidenote: C] earthly spirits, only avoids Styx by a slight elevation,
and is caught once in one hundred and seventy-seven secondary
measures[44]. As Styx moves upon her, the souls cry aloud in terror; for
many slip from off her and are caught by Hades. Others the moon bears
upwards from below, as they turn towards her; and for these death
coincides with the moment of birth, those excepted which are guilty and
impure, and which are not allowed to approach her while she lightens and
bellows fearfully; mourning for their own fate they slip away and are
borne downwards for another birth, as you see.” “But I see [Sidenote: D]
nothing,” said Timarchus, “save many stars quivering around the gulf,
others sinking into it, others, again, darting up from below.” “Then you
see the spirits themselves,” the voice said, “though you do not know it.
It is thus: every soul partakes of mind, there is none irrational or
mindless; but so much of soul as is mingled with flesh and with
affections is altered and turned towards the irrational by its sense of
pleasures and pains. But the mode of mingling is not the same for every
soul. Some are merged entirely into body, and are disturbed by passions
throughout their whole being during life. Others [Sidenote: E] are in
part mixed up with it, but leave outside their purest part, which is not
drawn in, but is like a life-buoy which floats on the surface, and
touches the head of one who has sunk into the depth, the soul clinging
around it and being kept upright, while so much of it is supported as
obeys and is not overmastered by the affections. The part which is borne
below the surface within the body is called soul. That which is left
free from dissolution most persons call mind, taking it to be something
inside themselves, resembling the reflected images in mirrors; but those
who are rightly informed know that it is outside themselves and address
it as spirit. The stars, Timarchus,” the voice went on, “which you see
extinguished, you are to [Sidenote: F] think of as souls entirely merged
in bodies; those which give light again and shine from below upwards,
shaking off, as though it were mud, a sort of gloom and dimness, are
those which sail up again out of their bodies after death; those which
are parted upwards are spirits, and belong to men who are said to have
understanding. Try to see clearly in each the bond by which it coheres
with soul.” Hearing this, he paid closer attention himself, and saw the
stars tossing about, some less, some more, as we see the corks which
mark out nets in the sea move over its surface; but some, like the
shuttles used in [Sidenote: 592] weaving, in entangled and irregular
figures, not able to settle the motion into a straight line. The voice
said that those who kept a straight and orderly movement were men whose
souls had been well broken in by fair nurture and training, and did not
allow their irrational part to be too harsh and rough. Those which often
inclined upwards and downwards in an irregular and confused manner, like
horses plunging off from a halter, were [Sidenote: B] fighting against
the yoke with tempers disobedient and ill-trained for want of education;
sometimes getting the mastery and swerving round to the right; again
bent by passions and drawn on to share in sins, then again resisting and
putting force upon them. The coupling bond, like a curb set on the
irrational part of the soul whenever it resists, brings on repentance,
as we call it, for sins, and shame for all lawless and intemperate
pleasures, being really a pain and a stroke inflicted by it on the soul
when it is bitted by that which masters and rules it, until at length,
being thus punished, it becomes obedient to the rein [Sidenote: C] and
familiar with it, and then, like a tame creature, without blow or pain,
understands the spirit quickly by signs and hints. These then are led,
late in the day and by slow degrees, to their duty. Out of those who are
docile and obedient to their spirit from the first birth, is formed the
prophetic and inspired class, to which belonged the soul of
Hermodorus[45] of Clazomenae, of which you have surely heard; how it
would leave the body entirely and wander over a wide range by night and
by day, and [Sidenote: D] then come back again, having been present
where many things were said and done far off, until the enemy found the
body, which his wife had betrayed, left at home deserted by its soul,
and burnt it. Now this part is not true; the soul used not to go out
from the body; but by always yielding to the spirit, and slackening the
coupling-band, he gave it constant liberty to range around, so that it
saw and heard and reported many things from the world outside. But those
who destroyed the body while he was asleep are paying the penalty in
Tartarus unto [Sidenote: E] this day. All this, young man, you shall
know more clearly in the third month from this; now begone!” When the
voice ceased, Timarchus wished to turn round, he said, and see who the
speaker was; but his head again ached violently, as though forcibly
compressed, and he could no longer hear or perceive anything passing
about him; afterwards, however, he came to [Sidenote: F] by degrees, and
saw that he was lying in the cave of Trophonius, near the entrance where
he had originally sunk down.
XXIII. ‘Such was the tale of Timarchus. When he died, having returned to
Athens in the third month after hearing the voice, and when, in our
wonder, we told Socrates of the story, he blamed us for not reporting it
while Timarchus was still alive, since he would gladly have heard it
more clearly from himself, and have questioned him further. There,
Theocritus, you have all, tale and theory both. But perhaps we ought to
invite the stranger to join our inquiry; the subject comes nearly home
to inspired men.’ ‘Well, but’, the stranger answered, ‘Epaminondas, who
puts out from the same port, is not contributing his opinion.’ Our
father smiled: ‘That is just his character, Sir. Silent and cautious in
speaking, but a glutton for learning and listening. That is why
Spintharus of Tarentum, after spending no little time with him here, is
always saying, as you know, that he never met [Sidenote: 593] any man of
his own standing who knew more or who spoke less. So pray let us have
all your own thoughts on the subject.’
XXIV. ‘Then, for my part,’ said Theanor, ‘I think that the story of
Timarchus ought to be dedicated to the God, as holy and inviolable. But
it will be strange to me if any shall be found to discredit what Simmias
tells us about the matter; thus, while they designate swans, serpents,
dogs and horses as sacred, refusing to believe that men may be godlike
and friends of God, yet holding that God is not a friend of birds but a
friend of man. As, then, a man who loves horses does not care equally
for all individuals which make the class, but always picks out and
separates [Sidenote: B] some excellent member of the class, and trains
him by himself and feeds him and loves him beyond others; so it is with
ourselves; the higher powers extract, if the word may pass, the best out
of the herd, and deem them worthy of a very special training, directing
their course, not by reins nor by halters, but by reason, through signs
utterly incomprehensible to the general herd. Why, most dogs do not
understand the signals used in hunting, nor most horses those used in
the manège; but those who have learned know at once from a whistle or a
chirrup what they are required to do, and easily take the right
position. Homer clearly knows the distinction [Sidenote: C] to which I
refer. Some of his prophets he calls “readers of dreams” and “priests”,
others understand the conversation of the Gods themselves, he thinks, by
sympathy, and signify the future to us. For instance:
_Thus they conferred: but Helenus, Priam’s son,
That scheme, which pleased them, in his heart divined._[46]
And again:
_So the everlasting voice I have heard and known._[47]
The mind of kings and generals is made known to outsiders through the
senses, by special beacons or proclamation, or calls on the trumpet; and
so the divine message reaches few of us in and [Sidenote: D] through
itself, and that rarely; for ordinary men signals are employed and these
are the groundwork of what we call divination. The Gods, then, regulate
life only for a few, for those whom they wish to make blessed in a
single degree, and truly divine; but souls released from coming to the
birth, and now for ever at rest from a body, and dismissed into freedom,
are spirits who care for men, in Hesiod’s sense. For as athletes, when
age has brought them an end of training, do not wholly lose the spirit
of competition or of care for the body, but delight to see others in
practice, and cheer them on and run beside them, so [Sidenote: E] those
who have ceased from the struggles of life, made spirits because of the
excellence of their soul, do not utterly despise our earthly affairs,
our discussions and our interests: they have a kindly feeling for those
training with the same end before them, they share their eagerness for
virtue, encourage them, and join them in their bursts, whenever they see
them running with hope near at hand and already within touch. For the
spirit does not help [Sidenote: F] all men as they come. It is as with
swimmers upon the sea; spectators on the shore merely gaze in silence on
those who are out in the open, drifting far from land; whereas they run
along the beach towards those who are already nearing it, they dash in
to meet them, and with hand, and voice, and endeavour, hasten to the
rescue. Such, Simmias, is the way of a spirit; while we are dipped
beneath the tides of life, changing body for body, like relays on a
road, he allows us to struggle out for ourselves, to be brave and
patient, to try by our own virtue to reach the harbour in safety. But
when any soul through a myriad of births has striven once and again a
long-drawn strife well and stoutly, and when, with the cycle now
wellnigh complete, it [Sidenote: 594] takes the risks, and sets its hope
high, as it nears the landing-place, and presses upwards with sweat and
endeavour, the God thinks it no wrong that its own spirit should go to
the help of such a soul, but lets zeal go free, and the Gods are zealous
to encourage and to save, one this soul and one that. The soul hearkens
because it is so near, and it is saved; but if it does not hearken the
spirit leaves it, and its happy chance is gone.’
XXV. As he finished, Epaminondas looked at me. ‘It is nearly your time,
Capheisias, to go to the gymnasium and not fail your comrades; we will
take care of Theanor, and break up [Sidenote: B] our conference whenever
he likes.’ ‘Let us do so,’ I said, ‘but I think Theocritus here wants a
few words with you while Galaxidorus and I are present.’ ‘By all means’,
said he; he rose and led the way to the angle of the portico. We stood
round and tried to encourage him to join the scheme. He answered that he
perfectly well knew the day of the return of the exiles, and had
arranged with Gorgidas as to all that was necessary for our friends, but
that he refused to take the life of any citizen without trial, unless
there were an urgent necessity; also, looking to the body of the
Thebans, it was specially convenient that there should be some person
with hands clean [Sidenote: C] and beyond suspicion, when the time
should come to advise the people for the best. We agreed, and he
returned at once to Simmias and his party. We went down to the gymnasium
and met our friends, and, pairing off for wrestling matches, exchanged
information and plans for action. We saw also Archias and Philippus,
anointed and starting for the supper. For Phyllidas, [Sidenote: D]
fearing that they might put Amphitheus to death first, called on Archias
immediately after he had escorted Lysanoridas, and by suggesting hopes
that the lady he desired to meet would come to the place, persuaded him
to turn his mind to having a good time with the usual companions of his
revels.
XXVI. It was now getting late, and the cold was intense, as the wind had
got up. Most people had therefore made for their homes more quickly than
usual. We had fallen in with Damocleidas, Pelopidas, and Theopompus, and
were taking them with us, as others took others of the exiles. For the
party had broken up immediately after crossing Cithaeron; and the bitter
[Sidenote: E] weather allowed them to muffle up their faces and pass
through the city in security. Some of them were met by a lightning flash
on the right without thunder, as they entered through the gates; and the
sign seemed favourable for safety and glory, with a bright issue to
follow and no danger.
XXVII. So when we were all inside, two short of fifty, while Theocritus
was sacrificing by himself in an outbuilding, there was a loud knocking
at the door; and presently some one came in to say that two servants of
Archias, sent on an urgent message to Charon, were knocking at the
courtyard gate and calling for it to [Sidenote: F] be opened, and were
angry at the slowness of the response. Charon was much disturbed, and
gave orders to open to them at once, while he himself went to meet them,
the crown on his head showing that he had sacrificed and was at his
wine, and asked the messengers what they wanted. One of them replied:
‘Archias and Philippus sent us, you are to come to them as quickly as
you can.’ When Charon asked, ‘What is the reason of this hasty summons,
and is there anything new?’ ‘We know nothing further,’ answered the
messenger, ‘but what shall we tell them?’ ‘This, by Zeus,’ said Charon,
‘that as soon as I have put off this crown and got my cloak, I will
follow you. For, if I go straight off with you, there will be an alarm;
people will think that I am in [Sidenote: 595] custody.’ ‘Do so,’ they
said, ‘for we too have orders to convey from the magistrates to the
guard of the lower city.’ So they went off. When Charon came in and told
us this, we were all aghast, thinking we had been betrayed. Most of us
were inclined to suspect Hippostheneidas; he had tried to hinder the
return by sending Chlidon, and when that failed and the dread moment was
upon us, he had used his plausible tongue to betray the scheme, out of
fear; for he did not come with the rest into the house, but the whole
impression he gave us was of a coward and turncoat. However, we all
thought that Charon ought to go, and obey the [Sidenote: B] summons of
the magistrates. He ordered his son to come in, the handsomest boy in
Thebes, Archidamus, and the most painstaking in his gymnastics; barely
fifteen, but in strength and size far above others of his age.
‘Gentlemen,’ he said, ‘he is my only one, and, as you know, I love him
dearly; I place him in your hands, and charge you in the name of the
Gods, and in the name of the spirits, if I should appear a traitor to
your cause, slay him, and spare us not. For the rest, my gallant
friends, set yourselves to meet the event; do not give in like shabby
cowards, or allow this scum to slay your bodies; defend yourselves, keep
your souls [Sidenote: C] above defeat, they are our country’s!’ As
Charon said this, we were wondering at his spirit and noble heart,
though indignant at his idea of suspicion on our part, and bade him take
the boy away. ‘More than that, Charon,’ said Pelopidas, ‘we think that
you have not been well advised in that you have not already removed your
son to another house. What need for him to run our risks if taken with
us? You must send him away even now, so that, if anything happen to us,
one noble nursling may be left to be our avenger on the tyrants.’ ‘Not
so;’ said Charon, ‘here he shall stay and share your risks; for, even in
his interest, it is not [Sidenote: D] good that he should fall into the
enemy’s hands. But you, my boy, be daring beyond your years, taste the
struggles which must come, take risks with our many brave countrymen in
the cause of freedom and valour; much hope still is left, and I think
that a God is surely watching over us in our contest for the right.’
XXVIII. Tears came to many of us, Archidamus, at the words of Charon.
Dry-eyed himself and unmoved, he placed his son in the hands of
Pelopidas, and made his way through the doors with a word of greeting
and encouragement for each of us. Even more would you have admired the
bright and fearless bearing of the boy himself in the peril. Like
Neoptolemus,[48] he showed no [Sidenote: E] paleness or alarm, but drew
the sword of Pelopidas and seemed to study it. In the meantime,
Diotonus, a friend of Cephisodorus, came in to us, sword in hand, and
wearing a steel breastplate under his clothes; and when we told him of
Charon being sent for by Archias, blamed us for losing time, and
implored us to go straight to the houses, where we should be upon them
before they were ready; failing that, it would be better, he said, to go
out into the open and form our parties there out of the scattered and
uncombined units, rather than shut ourselves up in a chamber [Sidenote:
F] and wait like a swarm of bees to be cut out by the enemy. The prophet
Theocritus added his urgent appeal; his victims showed a clear and good
result, and assured him of safety.
XXIX. While we were arming and making arrangements, Charon reappeared,
his face radiant. Smiling as he looked at us, he bade us take heart;
there was no danger and the business was moving on. ‘Archias’, he said,
‘and Philippus, when they heard [Sidenote: 596] that I had obeyed their
summons, were already heavy with drink, sodden alike in body and mind;
it was all they could do to stand upon their feet and move out towards
the door. When Archias said: “Charon, we hear that exiles have passed
into the city and are being concealed”, I was not a little troubled.
“Where are they said to be?” I asked, “and who are they?” “We do not
know,” replied Archias, “and therefore ordered you to come, on the
chance that you might have heard something more certain.” I took a
moment to recover my senses, as if after a blow, and began to put things
together. The information given could be no substantial story; the plot
had not been betrayed by any of those privy to it; for the tyrants could
not be in ignorance as to [Sidenote: B] the house if their information
came from any person with real knowledge; it must be merely a suspicion
or some indefinite rumour circulating in the city which had reached
them. So I answered: “I remember that in the lifetime of Androcleidas
there were often reports of the kind floating idly about and causing us
annoyance. But at the present time, Archias,” I went on, “I have heard
nothing of the sort; however, I will inquire into the story, if you so
desire, and, if I hear anything worth attention, you shall not fail to
know.” “By all means,” said Phyllidas, “look well into this matter and
leave no stone unturned. What is to prevent us? We must think nothing
beneath our notice, but must take all precautions and pay attention.
Forethought is good; safety is good!” As he said [Sidenote: C] this, he
took Archias by the arm and led him off into the house where they are
drinking. ‘Now, friends,’ he went on, ‘no delay for us, a prayer to the
Gods, and forth we go!’ When Charon had said this, we spent a while in
prayer and mutual encouragement.
XXX. It was now the hour at which people are mostly at supper; the wind
was still rising and drove beneath it snow with drizzle, so that the
narrow streets were quite empty as we made our way through them. The
party told off against Leontides and Hypates, who lived near one
another, went out cloaked and carrying no arms but a sword apiece (among
[Sidenote: D] these were Pelopidas, Damocleidas, and Cephisodorus).
Charon, Melon, and the rest who were to attack Archias, wore
half-cuirasses, and thick wreaths, some of firwood, some of pine. Some
were in women’s tunics, which gave the effect of a drinking procession
with women. But our ill-fortune, Archidamus, which set all the weakness
and ignorance of the enemy on a level with all our daring and
preparation, and chequered our action from the outset with perilous
episodes like a stage play, met us at [Sidenote: E] the moment of
action, and sharp and terrible was the crisis with its dramatic
surprise. Charon, having satisfied Archias and Philippus, had returned
home and was putting us through our parts, when there came a letter from
this city; it was from Archias the priest to Archias of Thebes, an old
friend and guest, it would seem, with full news of the return and plot
of the exiles, of the house [Sidenote: F] to which they had repaired,
and of those who were acting with them. Archias was by this time
drenched with wine, and excited about the expected arrival of the
ladies; he took the letter, but when the bearer said that it was
addressed to him about certain urgent business: “Then urgent business
to-morrow!” he said, and thrust the letter under his head cushion; then
he asked for a cup, kept calling for wine, the whole time ordering
Phyllidas to go out to the door and see whether the women were near.
XXXI. As they had beguiled their drinking with this hope, we joined the
company, and pushing our way through the servants to the banqueting hall
stood a short time at the door looking [Sidenote: 597] at each of the
party. Our crowns and dress and make-up, while apologizing for our
presence, caused a silence: but as soon as Melon rushed first up the
hall, his hand upon his sword-hilt, Cabirichus, the appointed president,
plucked him by the arm as he passed, and shouted out, ‘Phyllidas, is not
this Melon?’ Melon shook off his grasp, drawing his sword as he did so,
then, rushing upon Archias as with difficulty he found his feet, struck
and struck till he had killed him. Philippus received a neck wound from
Charon; he tried to defend himself with the drinking-cups [Sidenote: B]
which were near his hand, but Lysitheus threw him off the couch to the
ground and slew him. We tried to pacify Cabirichus, imploring him not to
assist the tyrants, but to join in our country’s deliverance,
remembering that he was a holy person and consecrated to the Gods for
her sake. As, however, from the wine he had taken, it was not easy to
carry his thoughts to the proper course, while he stood excited and
confused, and kept presenting the point of his spear (customarily worn
by our magistrates at all times), I myself seized it at the middle and
swung it over his head, crying to him to let go and save himself, or he
would be wounded. But Theopompus, standing near him [Sidenote: C] on the
right, struck him with his sword, and said: ‘Lie there with those whom
thou hast been flattering; never mayest thou wear a crown in a free
Thebes, nor sacrifice any longer to the Gods, in whose names thou hast
often called down curses on our country, and prayers for her enemies!’
When Cabirichus was down, Theocritus, who was with us, snatched the
sacred spear out of the wound; and we slew a few of the servants who
ventured on resistance, while we shut up in the hall those who behaved
quietly, not wishing them to slip away and spread news of what had
happened, before we knew whether things had gone [Sidenote: D] well with
our comrades also.
XXXII. Their history was this. Pelopidas and his party quietly
approached the courtyard door of Leontides, and told the servant who
answered their knock that they had come from Athens with letters for
Leontides from Callistratus. When he had given the message and received
orders to open, and had removed the bar and set the door a little ajar,
they burst in in a body, upset the man, and charged on through the court
to the bedroom of Leontides. His suspicions carrying him at once to the
truth he drew his dagger and rushed to defend himself; an unjust and
tyrannical man he was, but of sturdy courage and a [Sidenote: E]
powerful fighter. However, he did not make up his mind to throw down the
torch and close with the attacking party in the dark; but in the light,
and in their full view, as soon as they began to open the door, he smote
Cephisodorus on the groin, and closed with Pelopidas next, shouting
loudly all the time to call the attendants. These were held in check by
Samidas’ party, not venturing to come to blows with some of the best
known and bravest men in Thebes. Pelopidas and Leontides had to fight it
[Sidenote: F] out; it was a sword duel in the doorway of the chamber, a
narrow one, in the middle of which lay Cephisodorus, fallen and dying,
so that the others could not come in to the rescue. At last our man,
having received a slight wound in the head and having given many, and
thrown Leontides down, ran him through over the still warm body of
Cephisodorus. The latter saw the enemy falling, and placed his hand in
that of Pelopidas, saluted the others, and cheerfully breathed his last.
Leaving them, they turned against Hypates, and the door having been
opened to them there, in the same way, they cut him down while trying to
escape over a roof to the neighbours.
[Sidenote: 598] XXXIII. Thence they hastened towards us, joining us
outside, near the Polystyle. After mutual greetings and talk, we
proceeded to the prison. Phyllidas called the head jailer out and said:
‘Archias and Philippus order you to bring Amphitheus to them at once.’
He, remarking the strangeness of the hour, and that Phyllidas did not
seem composed as he spoke to him, but hot from the struggle and excited,
saw through our artifice: ‘When did the Polemarchs send for a prisoner
at such an hour, [Sidenote: B] Phyllidas,’ he asked, ‘and when by you?
What password do you bring?’ As he was speaking, Phyllidas, who carried
a cavalry lance, drove it through his ribs and brought the scoundrel to
the ground, where he was trampled and spat upon the next day by a number
of women. We burst open the doors of the prison, and called on the
prisoners by name; first Amphitheus, then our acquaintances among the
others. As they recognized the voices they leapt up from their pallet
beds, dragging their chains, while those whose feet were fast in the
stocks stretched out their hands, shouting and imploring us not to leave
them behind. As these were being released, many of those who lived near
came up, perceiving [Sidenote: C] what was going on and delighting in
it. The women, as soon as each heard about her own relation, dropped
Boeotian habits, and ran out to one another, asking questions from the
men who met them. Those who found their own fathers or husbands
followed, and no one tried to hinder them, for all who met them were
deeply affected by pity for the men, and by the tears and prayers of
modest women.
XXXIV. While things were thus, learning that Epaminondas [Sidenote: D]
and Gorgidas were already forgathering with our friends near the temple
of Athena, I took my way to join them. Many loyal citizens had already
arrived, and more kept pouring in. When I had told them in detail the
story of what had happened, and while I was imploring them to rally to
the market-place, all agreed to summon the citizens at once ‘For
Liberty!’ The crowds now forming up found arms to their hand in the
warehouses full of spoils from all lands and in the factories of the
swordmakers living near. Hippostheneidas had also arrived with friends
and servants, bringing the trumpeters, who had, as it happened, been
quartered in the town for the feast of Hercules. All at once they began
to sound calls, some in the market-place, [Sidenote: E] others
elsewhere, from every direction, to cause a panic among the other side,
and make them think that the rising was general. Some lighted smoky
fires[49] and so escaped to the Cadmeia, drawing with them also the
aristocrats, so called, who were accustomed to pass the night on the low
ground near the fortress. Those who were above, seeing this disorderly
and confused stream of incomers, and ourselves about the market-place,
no quiet anywhere, but indistinct noise and bustle rising up to them
from all quarters, never made up their minds to come down, though there
were some five thousand of them. They [Sidenote: F] thoroughly lost
their heads in the danger, and Lysanoridas was a mere excuse: they
professed to wait for his return, which was due that day. In
consequence, he was afterwards sentenced to a heavy fine by the
Lacedaemonian senate. Herippidas and Arcesus were arrested at Corinth
later on and put to death. The Cadmeia was evacuated by them and
surrendered to us under treaty, and the garrison withdrawn.
Footnote 20:
See, however, an article by Mr. R. F. Macnaghten in the _Classical
Review_ of September 1914 (vol. 28, p. 185 foll.).
Footnote 21:
_Isthm._ 1, 2.
Footnote 22:
So C. F. Hermann (ap. Ed. Teub.) for δυσί τῶν ἱερῶν.
Footnote 23:
Here several words of the text have been lost.
Footnote 24:
Many words have been lost (three separate lacunae).
Footnote 25:
Reading διεκώλυεν for διακούων.
Footnote 26:
Supplying προσδοκῶν, as Ed. Teub.
Footnote 27:
Many words are here lost, to the general effect of those in the
brackets.
Footnote 28:
i. e. each of the four sides of each of the six faces. The Greek word
for ‘side’ and ‘face’ is the same.
Footnote 29:
This problem (mentioned by Plutarch also in the _E at Delphi_, see p.
63) was in fact solved by Menaechmus, a pupil of Eudoxus, through
Conic Sections, and also by Archytas, whose method is much more
elaborate. See Preface, p. xiv.
Footnote 30:
_Il._ 10, 279; _Od._ 13, 300-1.
Footnote 31:
_Il._ 20, 95.
Footnote 32:
συμπιέσας for the MSS. reading συμπείσας (Reiske).
Footnote 33:
πταρμὸς ἤ (Ed. Teub.), for ἐφαρμόσει, is attractive, but it seems
better not to anticipate the word.
Footnote 34:
ἐπὶ ῥειτοῖς is K. O. Müller’s reading for ἐπὶ ρητις της of the MSS.
See Wordsworth’s _Athens and Attica_, p. 9.
Footnote 35:
Fr. 284 (the well-known fragment of the _Autolycus_ about Athletes) l.
22.
Footnote 36:
Cp. _Od._ 1, 170, &c.
Footnote 37:
_Od._ 1, 27.
Footnote 38:
See _Life of Nicias_, c. 3.
Footnote 39:
Aeschylus, _Prometheus_, 545.
Footnote 40:
Cp. Bacchylides, Fr. 37 (_Life of Numa_, c. 4): ‘Broad is the road’,
i. e. ‘there is room for divergent opinions.’
Footnote 41:
Compare _Life of Coriolanus_, c. 32, p. 229, with this difficult
passage.
Footnote 42:
Of the participle so translated only the termination remains. Reiske’s
μεταλλευόντων well completes this fine image.
Footnote 43:
This word is not in the Greek text.
Footnote 44:
See note on the Myths of Plutarch, p. 315.
Footnote 45:
Lucian (Musc. Encom. c. 7) tells the same story of Hermodorus.
Plutarch has probably made a slip, as elsewhere, in names. See p. 99.
Footnote 46:
_Il._ 7, 44-5.
Footnote 47:
l. 53.
Footnote 48:
i. e. in the Wooden Horse, _Od._ 11, 526-32.
Footnote 49:
Perhaps rather ‘the Laconizing party’, as the Teubner editor suggests.