THE SUNDAY LAWS OF PITTSBURG.*

_Question_. Colonel, what do you think of the course the Mayor

has pursued toward you in attempting to stop your lecture?

_Answer_. I know very little except what I have seen in the morning

paper. As a general rule, laws should be enforced or repealed;

and so far as I am personally concerned, I shall not so much complain

of the enforcing of the law against Sabbath breaking as of the fact

that such a law exists. We have fallen heir to these laws. They

were passed by superstition, and the enlightened people of to-day

should repeal them. Ministers should not expect to fill their

churches by shutting up other places. They can only increase their

congregations by improving their sermons. They will have more

hearers when they say more worth hearing. I have no idea that the

Mayor has any prejudice against me personally and if he only enforces

the law, I shall have none against him. If my lectures were free

the ministers might have the right to object, but as I charge one

dollar admission and they nothing, they ought certainly be able to

compete with me.

_Question_. Don't you think it is the duty of the Mayor, as chief

executive of the city laws, to enforce the ordinances and pay no

attention to what the statutes say?

_Answer_. I suppose it to be the duty of the Mayor to enforce the

ordinance of the city and if the ordinance of the city covers the

same ground as the law of the State, a conviction under the ordinance

would be a bar to prosecution under the State law.

_Question_. If the ordinance exempts scientific, literary and

historical lectures, as it is said it does, will not that exempt

you?

_Answer_. Yes, all my lectures are historical; that is, I speak

of many things that have happened. They are scientific because

they are filled with facts, and they are literary of course. I

can conceive of no address that is neither historical nor scientific,

except sermons. They fail to be historical because they treat of

things that never happened and they are certainly not scientific,

as they contain no facts.

_Question_. Suppose they arrest you what will you do?

_Answer_. I will examine the law and if convicted will pay the

fine, unless I think I can reverse the case by appeal. Of course

I would like to see all these foolish laws wiped from the statute

books. I want the law so that everybody can do just as he pleases

on Sunday, provided he does not interfere with the rights of others.

I want the Christian, the Jew, the Deist and the Atheist to be

exactly equal before the law. I would fight for the right of the

Christian to worship God in his own way just as quick as I would

for the Atheist to enjoy music, flowers and fields. I hope to see

the time when even the poor people can hear the music of the finest

operas on Sunday. One grand opera with all its thrilling tones,

will do more good in touching and elevating the world than ten

thousand sermons on the agonies of hell.

_Question_. Have you ever been interfered with before in delivering

Sunday lectures?

_Answer_. No, I postponed a lecture in Baltimore at the request

of the owners of a theatre because they were afraid some action

might be taken. That is the only case. I have delivered lectures

on Sunday in the principal cities of the United States, in New

York, Boston, Buffalo, Chicago, San Francisco, Cincinnati and many

other places. I lectured here last winter; it was on Sunday and

I heard nothing of its being contrary to law. I always supposed

my lectures were good enough to be delivered on the most sacred

days.

--_The Leader_, Pittsburg, Pa., October 27, 1879.

[* The manager of the theatre, where Col. Ingersoll lectured, was fined

fifty dollars which Col. Ingersoll paid.]

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Volume VIII. Interviews · 第 140 / 269 题