Chapter XXXI--The "Officially Sealed" Labels 78

THE POSTAGE STAMPS OF CANADA.

By BERTRAM W. H. POOLE.

INTRODUCTION.

Canada was originally the French colony of New France, which comprised

the range of territory as far west as the Mississippi, including the

Great Lakes. After the war of independence it was confined to what are

now the provinces of Quebec and Ontario--then known as Upper and Lower

Canada. At the confederation (1867) it included only these two

provinces, with New Brunswick and Nova Scotia; and since then it has

been extended by purchase (1870), by accession of other provinces

(British Columbia in 1871 and Prince Edward Island in 1873), and by

imperial order in council (1880), until it includes all the north

American continent north of United States territory, with the exception

of Alaska and a strip of the Labrador coast administered by

Newfoundland, which still remains outside the Dominion of Canada. On the

Atlantic the chief indentations which break its shores are the Bay of

Fundy (remarkable for its tides), the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and Hudson

Bay (a huge expanse of water with an area of about 350,000 square

miles); and the Pacific coast, which is small relatively, is remarkably

broken up by fjord-like indentations. Off the coast are many islands,

some of them of considerable magnitude,--Prince Edward Is., Cape Breton

Is., and Anticosti being the most considerable on the Atlantic side,

Vancouver and Queen Charlotte Is. on the Pacific; and in the extreme

north is the immense Arctic archipelago, bound in perpetual ice.

The surface of the country east of the great lakes is diversified, but

characterised by no outstanding features. Two ranges of hills skirt the

St. Lawrence--that on the north, the Laurentians, stretching 3,500 miles

from Lake Superior to the Atlantic, while the southern range culminates

in the bold capes and cliffs of Gaspé. The St. Lawrence and its

tributaries form the dominating physical feature in this section, the

other rivers being the St. John, the Miramichi, and the Restigouche in

New Brunswick. Eastern Canada is practically the Canadian part of the

St. Lawrence valley, (330,000 square miles), and the great physical

feature is the system of lakes with an area of 90,000 square miles. In

addition to the tributaries of the St. Lawrence already mentioned, the

Dominion boasts the Fraser, the Thompson, and the greater part of the

Columbia River in British Columbia; the Athabasca and Peace Rivers,

which flow into Lake Athabasca, and out of it as the Slave River, which

in its turn issues from the Great Slave Lake and flows into the Arctic

Ocean as the Mackenzie River (total length 2,800 miles); the Albany and

the Churchill, flowing into Hudson Bay, and the Nelson, which discharges

from Lake Winnipeg into Hudson Bay the united waters of the Assiniboine,

the Saskatchewan, the Red River and the Winnipeg.

West of the Great Lakes the scenery is less varied. From the lakes to

the Rockies stretches a vast level plain of a prairie character, slowly

rising from 800 feet at the east end to 3,000 feet at the foothills of

the Rockies.

The eastern and western portions of the Dominion are heavily wooded, and

comparatively little inroad has been made on the forest wealth of the

country. It is estimated that there are 1,200,000 square miles of

woodland and forest, chiefly spruce and pine, including about a hundred

varieties; consequently the industries connected with the forest are of

great importance, especially since the development of the pulp industry.

The central prairie plain is almost devoid of forest. Agriculture is the

dominant industry in Canada, not only in the great fertile plains of the

centre, but also on the lands which have been cleared of forest and

settled in other parts of the Dominion.

The Canadian climate is cold in winter and warm in summer, but healthy

all the year round. With all its extremes of cold it permits of the

cultivation in the open air of grapes, peaches, tobacco, tomatoes, and

corn. The snow is an essential condition of the prosperity of the timber

industry, the means of transport in winter, the protector of the soil

from frost, and the source of endless enjoyment in outdoor sports.

The French Canadians are almost exclusively the descendants of the

French in Canada in 1763, there being practically no immigration from

France. The French language is by statute, not by treaty, an official

language in the Dominion Parliament and in Quebec, but not now in any

other province, though documents, etc., may for convenience be published

in it. English is understood almost everywhere except in the rural parts

of Quebec, where the _habitants_ speak a patois which has preserved many

of the characteristics of 17th century French.

The Indian people, numbering a little over 108,000 in 1902, are

scattered throughout the Dominion. They are usually located on reserves,

where efforts, not very successful, are made to interest them in

agriculture and industry. Many of them still follow their ancestral

occupations of hunting and fishing, and they are much sought after as

guides in the sporting centres. The Dominion government exercises a good

deal of parental care over them and for them; but the race is

stationary, if not declining.

The constitution of Canada is of a federal character, midway between the

British and United States constitutions. The federated provinces retain

their local legislatures. The Federal Parliament closely follows the

British model, and the cabinet is responsible to the House of Commons.

The members of the Senate are appointed by the governor-general in

council, and retain their seats for life, and each group of provinces is

entitled to so many senators. The numbers of the commons vary according

to the population. The local legislatures generally consist of one

house, though Quebec and Nova Scotia still retain their upper houses.

The Federal Parliament is quinquennial, the local legislatures

quadrennial. The lieutenant-governors of the provinces are appointed by

the governor-general in council. The governor-general (appointed by the

King, though paid by Canada) has a right to disallow or reserve bills

for imperial consent; but the veto is seldom exercised, though the

imperial authorities practically disallowed temporarily the preferential

clauses of 1897. The Constitution of Canada can be altered only by

Imperial Parliament, but for all practical purposes Canada has complete

self-government.

In 1534, Jacques Cartier landed on the Gaspé coast of Quebec, of which

he took possession in the name of Francis I, King of France. But nothing

was done towards permanent occupation and settlement until 1608, when

Samuel de Champlain, who had visited the country in 1603 and 1604,

founded the city of Quebec. Meantime French settlements were made in

what is now the maritime provinces, but known to the French as Acadia.

France claimed, as a result of this settlement, exclusive control of the

whole immense region from Acadia west to Lake Superior, and down the

Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico. But the control of this region was

not uncontested. England claimed it by right of prior discovery, based

mainly on the discovery of Newfoundland in 1497 by John Cabot.

In the north the charter granted in 1670 by Charles II to Prince Rupert

to found the Hudson's Bay Company, with exclusive rights of trading in

the Hudson Bay basin, was maintained till 1869, when, on a payment of

$1,500,000, their territory was transferred to the newly created

Dominion of Canada. A long struggle was carried on between England and

France for the dominion of the North American continent, which ended in

the cession of Acadia by the treaty of Utrecht in 1713, and the cession

of Canada by the treaty of Paris in 1763. Of all its Canadian dependency

France retained only the Islands of St. Pierre and Miquelon, off the

coast of Newfoundland, and the vexatious French-shore rights.

During the war of American Independence Canada was invaded by the

Americans, and the end of the war saw a great influx of loyalists from

the United States, and the formation of two new colonies--New Brunswick

and Upper Canada (now Ontario). The treaty of peace in 1783 took away

from Canada territory now included within Minnesota, Michigan, Ohio,

Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin. In 1791, owing to differences of race,

Upper Canada was separated from Lower Canada; but discontent resulted in

rebellion in 1837-8 which occasioned Lord Durham's mission and report.

The results of that were the granting of responsible government to the

colonists, and in 1840 the reunion of the two provinces. But the

different elements, British and French Canadians, worked no better

together than they had done while separated; and in 1867, as an escape

from the deadlocks which occurred, confederation was consummated. After

the War of Independence the history of Canada is chiefly concerned with

the gradual removal of the commercial preferences she had enjoyed in the

English market, and the gradual concession of complete powers of

self-government.

The half-breeds of the north-west broke out in rebellion in 1869-70, but

it collapsed as soon as the forces led by Colonel Wolseley reached Fort

Garry on Winnipeg. Riel, the leader, escaped, to return later and foment

another outbreak in 1885. This proved more dangerous but was eventually

suppressed and Riel executed. The chief events since have been the

Halifax award (1888), which justified the Canadian contention against

the United States interference with fisheries. The Behring Sea award

(1897) settled the sealing difficulty; and a joint commission met at

Quebec in 1898 to determine all outstanding questions between Canada and

the United States. In 1903 these reached a final solution in the Alaskan

Boundary Commission's settlement of the frontier line between British

Columbia and Alaska.

CHAPTER I.--_Its Postal History._

The _Stamp Collector's Magazine_ for August, 1868, contained an

interesting article on the history of the Canadian Post-office, largely

compiled from information given in the "Canadian Postal Guide," which we

cannot do better than quote in full.

The earliest records of the administration of the post-office in Canada,

are dated 1750, at which period the celebrated Benjamin Franklin was

Deputy Postmaster-General of North America. At the time of his

appointment, the revenue of the department was insufficient to defray

his salary of $1500 per annum, but under his judicious management, not

only was the postal accommodation in the provinces considerably

extended, but the revenue so greatly increased, that ere long the profit

for one year, which he remitted to the British Treasury, amounted to

$15,000.

In the evidence given by Franklin before the House of Commons in the

year 1766, in regard to the extent of the post-office accommodation in

North America, he made the following statement:--

The posts generally travel along the sea coasts, and only in a few

cases do they go back into the country. Between Quebec and Montreal

there is only one post per month. The inhabitants live so scattered

and remote from each other in that vast country, that the posts

cannot be supported amongst them. The English colonies, too, along

the frontier, are very thinly settled.

In 1774, Franklin was recalled, and the following year the War of

Independence broke out, and the office was filled by Mr. Hugh Finlay,

who had, under his predecessor, been postmaster at Quebec.

Canada is divided into Upper and Lower. From a Quebec almanack of 1796,

we glean that there were seven offices in the former and five in the

latter. Mr. Finlay is designated as "Deputy Postmaster-General of His

Majesty's Province of Canada."

At that time mails were dispatched monthly to England, and semi-weekly

between Quebec and Montreal, or Halifax. At Baie des Chaleurs the visits

of the postman must, we conclude, have been few and far between, as they

were only favored with a mail "as occasion offered".

In 1800, Mr. George Heriot succeeded Mr. Finlay. At this time Prince

Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick, were all under the

authority of the Canadian administration.

The following is taken from the advertising column of the _Upper Quebec

Gazette_, printed in 1807:--

The mail for Upper Canada will be dispatched from the post-office

at Montreal, on the following days, to wit:

Monday, 14th January.

Monday, 12th February.

Monday, 12th March.

Monday, 7th April--the last trip.

A courier from Kingston may be looked for here in 14 or 15 days

from the above periods, where he will remain 2 or 3 days, and then

return to Kingston.

Another courier will proceed from this with the Niagara mail, via

Messrs. Hatts', where the Sandwich (co. Essex) letters will be

left, both from Niagara and this 'till the courier comes from there

to return with them.

Letters put into the post-office will be forwarded any time by

W. ALLAN,

Acting Deputy Postmaster.

Mr. Heriot resigned in 1816, and was succeeded by Mr. D. Sutherland,

who, on his accession to office, found Nova Scotia and Prince Edward

Island wholly withdrawn from the Canada charge. New Brunswick, however,

continued to be included in it. This appears also to have been withdrawn

in 1824, so that from that date until just lately, we have to do with

Canada proper.

In 1827 there were 101 post-offices, and 2,368 miles of established

post-route. The number of miles of mail-travel was 455,000. The letters

that year were estimated at 340,000, and newspapers, 400,000. From the

Canadian Postmaster-General's report for 1865, now lying before us, we

find the number of letters had increased to 12,000,000; the miles of

annual mail-travel was 6,350,000, the mails being carried regularly over

1,931 miles of railway route.

The following extract from the _Quebec Mercury_, published on July 18,

1829, conveys some idea of the postal communication with England at that

period:

No later advices have been received from Europe since our last.

Some further extracts from the London papers, to 31st May,

inclusive, brought to New York by the _Corinthian_, will be found

in another part of this number.

In the _Montreal Courant_, dated September 2nd, 1829, was the following

paragraph, showing the improvement which had been effected in the

communication between Prescott and that city:--

EXPEDITIOUS TRAVELLING.--On Saturday last, the Upper Canada line of

stages performed the journey from Prescott to this city in about 17

hours, leaving the former place at a little before 3 a. m., and

arriving here a few minutes before 8 in the evening. Not many years

ago this journey occupied two, and sometimes three days, but owing

to the great improvements made by Mr. Dickinson, the enterprising

proprietor, by putting steamboats on the lakes St. Francis and St.

Louis, and keeping his horses in excellent condition, it is now

performed in little more than one-third of the time.

Even so late as 1833, newspaper proprietors found it (particularly in

the Upper Province) better to employ their own couriers. As a proof of

this we transcribe from the _Queenston_ (Niagara) _Colonial Advocate_,

of that year the following advertisement:--

POST-RIDER WANTED IMMEDIATELY.

The proprietor of this newspaper wishes to contract with a steady

man (who can find and uphold his own horse) to deliver it to the

subscribers once a week during the winter, on the route between

York and Niagara, _via_ Ancaster.

Mr. Thomas A. Stayner was postmaster in 1841, and through his

recommendation a uniform rate of 1s 2d sterling, per half ounce, was

adopted between any place in Canada and the mother country. About this

time regular steam communication across the Atlantic was established.

The transfer of the Canadian post-office from the control of the

imperial authorities to the Colonial government, was effected April 6th,

1851. Mr. Stayner then resigned, and the office was filled by the Hon.

James Morris, who was the first Postmaster-General. This may be termed

the red-letter year of the Canadian post-office. In the first place, the

postage, which had hitherto been according to distance and had averaged

15 cents on each letter, was reduced to a uniform rate of 5 cents per

half ounce. The newspaper charge was also considerably reduced. Within a

year after, the number of letters transmitted through the post had

increased 75 per cent. The operation of the department was greatly

extended, and last, but most decidedly not least, was the introduction

of postage stamps. In February, 1855, the money-order system was first

begun, and has within the last few years been greatly extended. Letters

seem to have been first registered in 1856. In October of that year the

Grand Trunk Railway was completed as far as Toronto so that, in

connection with the Great Western, an unbroken line of postal

communication was established between Quebec in the east and Windsor in

the west.

The decimal system of coinage was introduced in 1859; this, of course,

as is well known, necessitated a new issue of postal labels.

We now arrive at the issue of labels for the new Dominion. The

post-office act was passed on the 21st of December, 1867, and came into

operation the 1st of April last. The internal rate is reduced from 5

cents to 3 cents the half ounce; but the postage to this country remains

unchanged.

The following is the order for the issue of the new labels:--

POSTAGE STAMPS.

To enable the public to prepay conveniently by postage stamp the

foregoing rates, the following denominations of postage stamps for

use throughout the Dominion, have been prepared, and will be

supplied to postmasters for sale:--

Half-cent stamps, one-cent ditto, two-cent ditto, three-cent ditto,

six-cent ditto, twelve-and-a-half-cent ditto, fifteen-cent ditto,

all bearing as a device the effigy of Her Majesty.

The postage stamps now in use in the several provinces may be

accepted, as at present, in prepayment of letters, etc., for a

reasonable time after the 1st of April; but from and after that

date all issues and sales to the public will be of the new

denomination.

Continuing the postal history from where the article in the _Stamp

Collector's Magazine_ concludes we find that in 1869 the color of the 1c

value was changed to yellow as it was found that the brown-red color was

too easily confused with the red of the 3c. Early in the following year

the 3c denomination appeared in a reduced size to be followed about

April by the 1c and it was, naturally, presumed that the whole set would

appear in this form. Two years elapsed, however, before further

additions were made for it was not until 1872 that the 2c and 6c values

appeared.

In 1874, an entirely new value--10 cents--was issued and in 1875 a 5c

stamp made its appearance in the large size of the 1868 series. Mr. C.

A. Howes, in his admirable monograph on the stamps of Canada, explains

the belated appearance of this label as follows:--"The die of this large

5 cent stamp had been engraved in 1867 with the other values of the

first Dominion series, but as there were no rates requiring such a

denomination in the set, it was not issued. When in 1875 the need for a

5 cent value arose, the unused die was employed to make a plate for

temporary use, until a new die conforming in size and design with the

small stamps could be prepared." This large 5 cent stamp had a short

life of about four months when it was superseded by the 5c value in the

same size as the other denominations of 1869-73.

In 1882, the 1/2c value was reduced in size so that this stamp, as in

the case of its predecessor of 1868, was smaller than the other

denominations. From that date until 1892 no further changes were made so

far as new designs or values were concerned though some striking

alterations in shade took place, notably in the case of the 6c and 10c

values.

In 1892, 20c and 50c stamps were issued for use on heavy packages. These

not only differed in design from the other stamps of the series then

current but were also very much larger. In 1893 an 8c stamp was issued

which was used for prepayment of postage and the registration fee and

upon its advent the special registration stamps ceased to be printed

though existing stocks were, presumably, used up. In 1897, the Diamond

Jubilee of Queen Victoria was celebrated by the issue of a special

series of stamps comprising no less than sixteen values ranging all the

way from 1/2c to $5. As to the utility, to say nothing of the necessity,

of some of the higher denominations perhaps the less said the better for

before and since Canada has managed to get along very well with a

highest regular denomination of 50c.

In the latter months of the same year, and early in 1898 a new set was

issued in a uniform design showing the jubilee portrait of the Queen.

This is known as the maple leaf issue from the fact that the lower

angles are ornamented with maple leaves and in contradistinction to a

modified design which almost immediately replaced it which had numerals

in the lower corners.

The Christmas of 1898 was marked by the issuance of the celebrated 2c

map stamp with its proud motto "We hold a vaster Empire than has been".

This stamp was issued to mark the introduction of Imperial Penny

Postage, and one consequence of the reduction in the postal rate was so

to reduce the demand for the 3c value that in order to use up existing

supplies more quickly they were overprinted "2 cents".

In 1899, the color of the 2c stamp was changed from purple to carmine,

thus conforming to Postal Union regulations, in December, 1900, a 20c

stamp of the type of 1898 was issued on the final exhaustion of the

stock of the 1893 type; and in 1902 a 7c value was issued in place of

the 8c for combined use in payment of registration and postage.

In 1903, 1c, 2c, 5c, 7c, and 10c values were issued bearing King

Edward's portrait, a year later the 20c value in the same type was

placed on sale, and in 1908, the stock of the old 50c stamps of 1893

having at last been used up, a King Edward stamp of that value was

issued. In the same year the three hundredth anniversary of the founding

of Quebec by Champlain was celebrated by the issue of a special set of

stamps these being of the same large size as the Jubilee series of 1897,

but with a different design for each denomination, while in 1912 a new

series bearing the portrait of King George V made its bow and this

completes Canada's postal history to date.

CHAPTER II.--_A Postmaster's Provisional._

Postage stamps were first placed on sale to the public in Canada on

April 23rd, 1851, as we shall show later, but, according to an

interesting article which appeared in the _London Philatelist_ for June,

1904, it seems possible that at least one postmaster anticipated events

slightly by issuing a stamped envelope of his own shortly before the

regular governmental stamps were ready. It will perhaps simplify matters

to reproduce the article in its original form, viz.:--

CANADA: HAND-STAMPED 3D ENVELOPE OF 1851.

We are indebted to Mr. E. B. Greenshields, of Montreal, for the

following very interesting information:--

The following facts may be of interest to collectors of the stamps

of British North America. Some time ago a cover was offered to me,

which seemed to me to be absolutely genuine, yet I had never, up to

that time, heard of such envelopes being in existence. This letter

was posted in New Carlisle, Gaspé, Lower Canada, on April 7th,

1851, and was stamped "Three Pence" in two lines, inside a square,

with a black border of neat design around the sides. Across this

was written, "Letter R. W. Kelly Apl. 1851". The letter was

addressed to Toronto, C. W., and on the other side was stamped the

date the letter was received, "Apl. 16 1851". I sent the envelope

to Mr. Donald A. King, of Halifax, and received the following reply

from him:--

HALIFAX, N. S., February 22nd, 1904.

"Dear Sir,--I have yours of 19th inst. with cover, and am much

obliged for your kindness in permitting me to have a look at it. It

is new to me. I have no doubt it is absolutely genuine, and

probably was made by the Postmaster at New Carlisle to save trouble

in stamping the letter '3d' as was then the custom. It is just

possible that the writer (whose name appears to be endorsed on the

envelope) was the Postmaster there. A reference to the

Postmaster-General's report for that year would give his name. As

far as my memory serves me, the Canadian stamps were not then in

issue, though an advance circular may have been sent out. I have

shown the cover to a friend of mine who is an expert in typography,

and he assures me that the printing is as old as dated, and that

such type and border could not be procured now at any cost. The

only thing that I have seen that resembles it in any way was a

cover from Prince Edward Island, prepaid with a square of white

paper stamped 3d and cancelled. This was an adhesive, and used some

years after stamps were in use. As in your case, it had been

recognised as paying postage. As to the value of your cover, it is

impossible for me to say, but very considerable to any collector of

British North America.

"Yours faithfully,

"DONALD A. KING."

Following up the clue given to me by Mr. King, I wrote to the Post

Office Department at Ottawa, and received the following courteous

answer:--

OTTAWA, 2nd March, 1904.

"Sir,--I am directed to acknowledge receipt of your communication

of the 26th ultimo, inquiring whether R. W. Kelly was Postmaster of

New Carlisle, Co. Gaspé, Quebec, in 1851, and in reply am directed

to inform you that R. W. Kelly, doubtless the same man, was

Postmaster of New Carlisle in 1851. Owing to the incompleteness of

the early records of the department, which was then under the

direction of the British Office, the date of Mr. Kelly's

appointment cannot be ascertained. He appears to have been

Postmaster from 1851, however, until his resignation on the 9th

April, 1855.

"As regards your inquiry as to whether postage stamps were used on

the 7th April, 1851, and your statement that you have an envelope

sent on that date from New Carlisle to Toronto with 'Three Pence'

printed on it, inside a fancy border, I have to say that postage

stamps were issued to the public for the first time on the 23rd

April, 1851, and that stamped envelopes were not issued until some

years later. The stamped envelope to which you refer may have been

an envelope so stamped on the prepayment in the New Carlisle Post

Office, of three pence, the required charge for postage.

"I am, sir, your obedient servant,

"WILLIAM SMITH, Secretary."

It will be noted from the conclusion of this letter that, according to

the department at Ottawa, one might infer that the use of such a stamp

would not be irregular. This is confirmed by the following extract from

a reply to a letter a friend of mine wrote to Ottawa at my request:--

OTTAWA, March 2nd, 1904.

"I took those questions of Mr. Greenshields over to Mr. ---- of the

Post Office Department. He tells me that before the first issue of

stamps, which took place on the 23rd of April, 1851, each

Postmaster had a steel stamp which he used to mark the amount

prepaid on the letter. These stamps were of different patterns, and

it is probably the impression of one of them that appears on Mr.

Greenshield's envelope. In some of the smaller post-offices they

continued to use these stamps as late as 1875.

"It is rather a singular coincidence that if the inquiry had been,

regarding the position of Postmaster, more than one day earlier,

the Canadian records would not have shown whether the man named had

held office or not, the reason being that it was on the 6th of

April, 1851, that the Post Office Department was transferred from

the Imperial Government, and all records prior to that date are in

the possession of the Imperial authorities."

It seems strange that more of these covers have not been found.

Such well-known authorities on the stamps of British North America

as Mr. Lachlan Gibb and Mr. William Patterson, of Montreal, and Mr.

Donald A. King, of Halifax, had not seen any until I consulted them

about this one. I think it is very interesting to hear of a stamped

envelope like this being used by the Post Office just before the

issue of postage stamps.

So far as we have been able to find out the above constitutes all that

has been published regarding this envelope. We can find no further

mention of it in the columns of the _London Philatelist_ or of any other

journal published since 1904 nor does Mr. Howes so much as refer to it

in his recently published monograph on Canada's postal issues. Yet, on

the face of it, the matter seems one worthy of extended investigation by

some Canada specialist or other. Its history, as given above, is similar

in many respects to the history of many of the much sought after

Postmaster's provisional stamps of the United States and there is a

possibility that this envelope may represent a legitimate postmaster's

provisional.

CHAPTER III.--_The First Issue._

In common with the other Colonies of British North America Canada was

granted the privilege of administrating its own postal service in 1850,

and in the same year an Act was passed providing for the change. It is

hardly necessary to quote this Act in full though the following extracts

are of interest:--

CAP. VII.

An Act to provide for the transfer of the management of the Inland

Posts to the Provincial Government, and for the Regulation of the

said department.

II.--And be it enacted, that the Inland Posts and Post

Communications in this Province shall, so far as may be consistent

with the Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom in force in

this Province, be exclusively under Provincial management and

control; the revenues arising from the duties and postage dues

receivable by the officers employed in managing such Posts and Post

Communications shall form part of the Provincial Revenue, unless

such monies belong of right to the United Kingdom, or to some other

Colony, or to some Foreign State, and the expenses of management

shall be defrayed out of Provincial Funds, and that the Act passed

in the Eighth year of Her Majesty's Reign, and entitled An Act to

provide for the management of the Customs, and of matter relative

to the collection of the Provincial Revenue, shall apply to the

said Posts and Post Communications, and to the officers and persons

employed in managing the same, or in collecting or accounting for

the duties and dues aforesaid, except in so far as any provision of

the said Act may be insusceptible of such application, or may be

inconsistent with any provision of this Act.

VIII.--And in conformity to the agreement made as aforesaid between

the Local Governments of the several Colonies of British North

America, be it enacted that the Provincial Postage on letters and

packets not being newspapers, printed pamphlets, magazines or

books, entitled to pass at a lower rate, shall not exceed

Threepence currency per half-ounce, for any distance whatsoever

within this Province, any fraction of a half-ounce being chargeable

as a half-ounce; that no transit postage shall be charged on any

letter or packet passing through this Province, or any part

thereof, to any other Colony in British North America, unless it be

posted in this Province, and the sender choose to prepay it; nor on

any letter or packet from any such Colony, if prepaid there; that

Twopence sterling the half-ounce shall remain as the rate in

operation as regards letter by British mails, to be extended to

countries having Postal Conventions with the United Kingdom, unless

Her Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom shall see fit to

allow this rate to be changed to Threepence currency; that the

prepayment of Provincial Postage shall be optional.

That all Provincial Postage received within the Province shall be

retained as belonging to it, and that all Provincial Postage

received within any other Colony of the British North American

Colonies may be retained, as belonging to such Colony. That no

privilege of franking shall be allowed as regards the Provincial

Postage. That Provincial Stamps for the prepayment of postage may

be prepared under the orders of the Governor in Council, which

stamps shall be evidence of the prepayment of Provincial Postage to

the amount mentioned on such stamps; and that such stamps, prepared

under the direction of the proper authorities in the other British

North American Colonies, shall be allowed in this Province as

evidence of the prepayment of Provincial Postage in such other

Colonies respectively, on the letters or packets to which they are

affixed and which have been mailed there.

The passage of the above Act and its approval by the Imperial government

was followed by a notice to postmasters which gave the date at which the

transfer of the postal system from Imperial to Provincial authority was

to take effect, gave more explicit instructions with regard to rates of

postage, and stated that postage stamps were being prepared. Mr. Howes

gives the chief provisions of this Notice as follows:--

NOTICE TO POSTMASTERS.

GENERAL POST OFFICE.

MONTREAL, _14th March, 1851._

Sir:--

I am commanded by His Excellency the Governor General, to

communicate to you the following instructions, for your guidance in

the performance of your duties, under the New Post Office Law of

the 13th and 14th Vict., chap. 17, passed at the last Session of

the Provincial Parliament, which will take effect, and supersede

the Imperial Post Office Acts, hitherto in force in Canada, on and

from the 6th day of April next:

1.--From the above date, all Letters transmitted by the Post in

Canada, with the exception of Packet Letters to and from the United

Kingdom, will be liable to a uniform rate of _Three Pence_,

currency, per half-ounce for whatever distance conveyed: prepayment

will be optional: the charge increasing according to the weight of

the Letter, one single rate for every additional half-ounce,

counting the fraction of a half-ounce as a full rate, thus:

A Letter, weighing not exceeding 1/2 ounce, will be liable to 3d

postage.

A Letter, weighing more than 1/2 ounce, and not exceeding 1 ounce,

will be liable to 6d Postage.

A Letter, weighing more than 1 ounce, and not exceeding 1-1/2

ounces will be liable to 9d Postage, and so on.

It will be observed that the above scale differs from that now

followed, in advancing one rate for each half-ounce after the first

ounce.

2.--The single Packet rate for Letters by the Atlantic Steam Packet

Mails to and from England, via the United States, of 1s 2d

sterling, if _unpaid_, and 1s 4d currency, if _prepaid_, as also

the rate on Letters, by those mails, via Halifax, of 1s sterling,

if _unpaid_, and 1s 1-1/2d currency, if _prepaid_, remain

unaltered, and the present scale of weights is to remain in force

as regards such Letters.

Post Masters must be very careful to observe this distinction when

taxing letters, weighing over one-ounce, intended for the English

Mails.

3.--The regulations now in force with regard to Letters to and from

Soldiers and Sailors in Her Majesty's Service, by which under

certain conditions such Letters pass through the Post on prepayment

of a penny only, remain unaltered.

5.--Letters addressed to New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince

Edward's Island, or Newfoundland, are to be rated with the uniform

rate of 3d per half-ounce.

6.--Letters to and from the United States will be liable to the

uniform rate of 3d per half-ounce, between the Frontier line and

the place of posting or place of destination in Canada; and until

further arrangements can be made, this charge on Letters from

Canada to the United States must be prepaid at the time of Posting.

9.--The charge on Letters posted at an office for delivery in the

same City, Town, or Place, and any additional charge made on

Letters delivered at the residence of parties to whom they are

addressed, are to remain as at present, until further instructions.

10.--No Franking Privilege is allowed under the New Act, except

with regard to Letters and Packets on the business of the Post

Office, addressed to or transmitted by the Post Master General.

13.--Stamps for the prepayment of Postage are being prepared and

will be distributed for the use of the public at an early date.

T. A. STAYNER.

_Deputy Post Master General._

Shortly afterwards a Notice, or Department Order, dated April 2nd, 1851,

was issued to postmasters regarding the rates of postage between Canada

and the United States, California and Oregon. It is hardly necessary to

reproduce this in its entirety and it will suffice to state that the

rate on single letters to the United States was sixpence currency,

equivalent to ten cents in United States money, while to California and

Oregon the rate was nine pence currency per half-ounce. On newspapers,

pamphlets, etc., the rates were the same as those for Canada itself with

the stipulation that all such mail must be prepaid. Certain offices were

named for handling the mail between Canada and the United States, viz:

Post Sarnia, Windsor, Fort Erie, Queenston (the channel of communication

with the United States for the country west of Toronto), Niagara,

Toronto, Cobourg (a communication during summer only, by steamer to

Rochester), Kingston, Brockville, Prescott, Montreal, St. John's,

Dundee, and Stanstead.

On the 21st of April, 1851, an Order was issued from the Post Office

Department referring to the issue of stamps. The most interesting

paragraphs from this order are:--

Postage Stamps are about to be issued, one representing the Beaver,

of the denomination of Three pence; the second representing the

head of Prince Albert, of the denomination of Six pence; and the

third, representing the head of Her Majesty, of the denomination of

One shilling; which will shortly be transmitted to the Post Masters

at important points, for sale.

Any Letter or Packet, with one or more Stamps affixed, equal in

amount to the Postage properly chargeable thereon, may be mailed

and forwarded from any office as a prepaid Letter or Packet; but if

the Stamps affixed be not adequate to the proper Postage, the Post

Master receiving the Letter or Packet for transmission will rate it

with the amount deficient in addition. This Regulation concerning

Letters short paid has reference only to Letters passing within the

Province.

Stamps so affixed are to be immediately _cancelled_ in the office

in which the Letter or Packet may be deposited, with an instrument

to be furnished for that purpose. In Post Offices not so furnished,

the stamps must be cancelled by making a cross (X) on each with a

pen. If the cancelling has been omitted on the mailing of the

Letter, the Post Master delivering it will cancel the stamp in the

manner directed, and immediately report the Post Master who may

have been delinquent, to the Department. Bear in mind that Stamps

must invariably be cancelled before mailing the Letters to which

they are affixed.

It is rather interesting to note that the series comprised only three

values, though the postal rates, as shown in the Notice quoted above,

and further amplified in a lengthy set of "Regulations and Instructions"

called for numerous rates of 1/2d and 1d as well as 7-1/2d so that it

certainly seems strange that no provision was made for stamps by means

of which such rates could be prepaid.

The beaver is typical of Canada, for the prosperity of the Colony is

largely founded on this animal, whose skin has been a valuable article

of commerce since the days of the early trappers in the land of the

maple tree. The choice of a beaver as the central theme of the design of

Canada's first stamp--the 3d value--is, therefore, particularly

appropriate. The stamp is rectangular in shape and the centrepiece is

enclosed within a transverse oval band inscribed "CANADA POSTAGE" at the

top, and "THREE PENCE" below. Above the beaver is an Imperial crown

which breaks into the oval band and divides the words "CANADA" and

"POSTAGE." This crown rests on a rose, shamrock, and thistle (emblematic

of the United Kingdom) and on either side are the letters "V R"

(_Victoria Regina_, i.e. Queen Victoria). In each of the angles is a

large uncolored numeral "3". Mr. Howes tells us that this stamp was

designed by Sir Stanford Fleming, a civil engineer and draughtsman.

[Illustration]

The beaver, depicted on this stamp, rejoices in the scientific name of

_Castor fiber_. It is a rodent of social habits and was at one time

widely distributed over Europe and North America. It is now practically

extinct except in Canada and even there it is said to be in great danger

of extermination. Full-grown animals vary in length from thirty to

thirty-six inches. They are covered with short, thick fur, which is of

considerable value and their structural peculiarities are well worth

noting. The beaver is furnished with powerful incisor teeth, with which

it is able to bite through fairly large trees, and its fore paws are

very strong. Its hind feet are webbed, so that it is a powerful swimmer,

and its tail is flattened, and serves as an excellent rudder. Its ears

are small and when laid back prevent any water entering them. Beavers

generally live in colonies, and show remarkable intelligence and

ingenuity in the construction of their homes or "lodges" and in the

building of dams, where water in the vicinity of their dwellings has

become too shallow to suit their tastes. These dwellings are often

constructed on the banks of rivers, but the Canadian beaver is

particularly fond of building lodges in the centre of large expanses of

fairly shallow water. These are made of turf, tree-trunks, and other

materials, and are often used as store houses for food reserves, as well

as for living in.

The 6d stamp follows the usual upright rectangular form and its central

design consists of the portrait of Prince Albert, the Royal Consort. The

portrait is enclosed within an upright oval inscribed in a similar

manner to the 3d but with, of course, "SIXPENCE" on its lower portion.

The numeral "6" is shown in each of the four angles. Albert Francis

Charles Augustus Emanuel the younger of the two sons of Ernest, Duke of

Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, was born in 1819. He was carefully educated at

Brussels and Bonn (1836-8), where he showed himself an ardent student,

acquired many accomplishments, and developed a taste for music and the

fine arts. King Leopold and Baron Stockmar had long contemplated an

alliance between Prince Albert and Princess Victoria, and the pair were

brought together in 1836. When the succession of Victoria was assured

the betrothal took place, and on February 19th, 1840, the marriage,

which was one of real affection on both sides, was solemnized in the

Chapel Royal, St. James Palace. The Prince Consort's position as the

husband of a constitutional sovereign was difficult, and in the early

years of his married life his interference in matters of state was

resented. Ultimately he became "a sort of minister, without portfolio,

of art and education", and in this capacity won much esteem and

popularity. He also interested himself in agriculture and in social and

industrial reform. To him was due the Great Exhibition of 1851, which

resulted in a balance of a million dollars available for the

encouragement of science and art. His personal character was very high,

and he exercised great influence on his children. He was an ideal

consort, and entirely worthy of the title "Albert, the Good". On

December 14th, 1861, he succumbed to an attack of fever, and was buried

in St. George's Chapel, Windsor. His remains were afterwards removed to

the mausoleum at Frogmore.

[Illustration]

The 12d stamp is very similar in design to the 6d denomination but bears

the portrait of Queen Victoria. The life and reign of Queen Victoria are

matters of such general knowledge that biographical details are hardly

necessary. A few words, however, regarding the source of this handsome

portrait, which was used to adorn so many of the earlier British

Colonial stamps, will not be amiss. Mr. Howes tells us that this

portrait "was taken from the full length painting by Alfred Edward

Chalon, R. A., which was ordered by the Queen for her mother, the

Duchess of Kent, as a souvenir of Her Majesty's first visit to the House

of Lords. The occasion was the prorogation of Parliament, on July 17th,

1837, and the Queen is portrayed in her robes of state, because of which

fact the painting is sometimes described as 'in Coronation Robes', but

this is erroneous."

The 12d requires a few words in explanation of the manner in which the

value was expressed for "One Shilling" would appear to be a more natural

form for this amount rather than "Twelve Pence". Mr. Donald A. King

says:--"This was undoubtedly done intentionally, as though it was

intended for a one shilling stamp, yet it could not be called that, as

there were a number of _shillings_ of different values in circulation in

the Colony. If the stamp had been lettered 'One Shilling', the Post

Office was liable to have tendered for it 6-1/2d, 7-1/2d, 10d or 12d,

according to locality".

Mr. Howes gives a fuller explanation which we cannot do better than

quote in his own words:--

"A glance back at the rates of postage we have already quoted will

show that it was generally necessary to give them in two forms,

'currency' and 'sterling'. The somewhat depreciated Canadian

currency required fifteen pence, as will be noted, to equal the

shilling sterling--a point brought out on the two stamps issued

subsequently for the British Packet rates. Add to this fact that in

New England the 'shilling' was a current expression for 16-2/3

cents (10 pence currency), while in New York it represented 12-1/2

cents (7-1/2 pence currency) and we can readily see that in

Canadian territory contiguous to these sections the number of pence

to a 'shilling' might often be a debatable quantity. As a matter of

fact the French Canadians of Lower Canada made general use of the

'shilling' as reckoned at 10 pence (20 cents) in the old currency,

while the 'York shilling' was extensively used in Upper Canada.

'Twelve Pence' was without doubt wholly intentional, therefore, as

the designation of the stamp, and was happy solution of any

ambiguity in its use, even if it has proved a stumbling block to

the understanding of latter day collectors."

The three values forming this first issue were manufactured by Messrs.

Rawdon, Wright, Hatch and Edson, of New York, who are, perhaps, better

known to fame as the engravers of the 1847, 5c and 10c stamps for the

United States government. All three stamps were printed from plates

engraved in _taille douce_ the plates consisting of one hundred

impressions arranged in ten horizontal rows of ten each. The

manufacturer's imprint--"Rawdon, Wright, Hatch & Edson, New York"--was

engraved twice on each of the four sides quite close to the stamps. The

imprints were so placed that the bottoms of the letters are always next

to the stamps with the consequence that on the printed sheets of stamps

the imprints read upwards at the left, downwards at the right, and

upside down on the bottom margins.

A variety of the 3d denomination is catalogued with "double transfer".

This is, of course, a plate variety caused like all similar ones by a

faulty or incorrect rocking of the roller impression on the plate and a

correction on top of this impression which did not always entirely

obliterate the first impression. Mr. Howes says this variety "is

recognized by the letters EE PEN being 'doubled' at the top, making it

appear as if a line had been drawn through the words and giving it the

name occasionally used of the 'line through threepence' variety." There

are at least two other similar varieties of "double transfers" known on

this value for in the _Philatelic World_ for December, 1908, Mr. A. J.

Sefi described and illustrated three different ones. One of these is a

variety mentioned by Mr. Howes, another shows a distinct doubling of

parts of the details of the two left-hand corners, while the third

variety shows a doubling of the upper right hand corner. It is quite

possible a close study of these stamps would reveal others and also

similar varieties in the 6d and 12d. "Double strikes" are not uncommon

on stamps produced by the line-engraved process though they are not

often so striking as the first of these Canadian varieties and those

found on the United States 10c stamp of 1847.

According to a valuable summary from official records published in the

_Metropolitan Philatelist_ we learn that the first delivery of stamps

from the manufacturers took place on April 5th, 1851, when 100,000 of

the 3d denomination were delivered to the Canadian Government. On April

20th, a second supply of the same value comprising 150,200 stamps

arrived in Canada. On May 2nd 100,400 of the 6d were received followed

two days later by 51,400 of the 12d this latter being the only

consignment of the highest value ever received from the printers. We

have already pointed out that the 3d was placed on sale on April 23rd,

1851. The date of issue of the 6d is not known for certain as there are

no official records relating to this though, as a supply was received on

May 2nd, they were doubtless issued some time during the same month. The

12d was issued on June 14th as we shall show later.

The three values of this series, as well as other denominations in pence

issued later, were withdrawn from use on July 1st, 1859, when decimal

currency was introduced. By means of much diligent search through Post

Office Reports and other records Mr. Howes has determined that a total

of 3,528,700 3d stamps were issued and a total of 402,900 of the 6d

value. Some of both these values were issued with perforation late in

1857 or early in 1858. Unfortunately there is no means of separating

these from the imperforate ones as shown by the official figures but if

we use the somewhat rough-and-ready means of reckoning afforded by

catalogue quotations it would seem that of the above totals about three

million of the 3d and 325,000 of the 6d were imperforate.

The 12d value, as every collector knows, is a very rare stamp. Even had

the full supply of 51,000 stamps, received in the first and only

consignment from the manufacturers on May 4th, 1851, been issued, it

would have been a rare variety, but as a matter of fact, the greater

portion of the consignment was destroyed and only 1510 were actually

issued. An interesting article published in the _Metropolitan

Philatelist_ in 1902 shows that this denomination was first issued on

June 14th, 1851, and supplies were made to various post offices as

follows:--

No. Stamps

June 14th, 1851, Hamilton, 300

Oct. 17th, 1851, Chippewa, 100

Nov. 13th, 1851, Thorold, 20

Nov. 25th, 1851, Toronto, 200

Mar. 8th, 1852, Montreal, 200

Sept. 14th, 1852, Ingersoll, 100

Apr. 5th, 1853, Ottawa (then known as Bytown), 100

Oct. 20th, 1853, Sherbrooke, 15

Jan. 13th, 1854, Smith's Falls, 50

Jan. 20th, 1854, Ottawa, 100

Feb. 8th, 1854, L'Islet, 15

Feb. 27th, 1854, Ingersoll, 20

Mar. 22nd, 1854, Sault S. Marie, 25

May 15th, 1854, Port. du Fort, 15

Oct. 21st, 1854, Rowan Mills, 50

Oct. 26th, 1854, Melbourne, 50

Oct. 27th, 1854, Montreal, 100

Dec. 4th, 1854, Smith's Falls, 50

Total stamps, 1,510

The consignment sent to Smith's Falls on December 4th, 1854, was the

last distributed. While we can trace no official notice referring to the

discontinuance of this denomination, or the actual date at which it

ceased to be used, the writer of the article referred to above says that

the balance of 49,490 stamps were destroyed on May 1st, 1857, "in

accordance with the practice of the Department in cases of the

discontinuance of stamps" though as this was the first Canadian stamp to

be discontinued, a precedent could hardly have been established.

The following interesting excerpt from the _Stamp Collectors' Magazine_

for April, 1870, states that the 12d value was discontinued in 1855 and

it also lays considerable stress on the scarcity of used specimens of

this stamp, viz:--

One of our readers observing from a reply we made to a

correspondent in the last October number, that we were in doubt as

to whether the 12d was ever actually used, has been good enough to

write the Deputy Postmaster-General on the subject and has obtained

from him the following reply:--

"OTTAWA, 28th October, 1869.

"DEAR SIR:--In reply to your note of the 26th inst., let me say

that the twelve penny postage stamps were issued to the public in

1851, but did not find favor, and so few were sold--only a few

hundred altogether in three or four years--that they ceased to be

issued in 1855.

"I am, dear Sir, yours very faithfully,

"W. A. SMYTH."

This is satisfactorily conclusive as to the emission of the stamp in

question; but if even only a few hundreds were used, we are surprised

that no used copies turn up. Were they used otherwise than for postage?

Mr. Philbrick informs us that no unused copy of the stamp was ever seen

by him, nor does he know of its existence. Plenty of proofs on India

paper, etc., exist, but the paper of the stamp was laid and thin, of a

hard texture.

An extract from the _Stamp Collectors' Monthly Gazette_, published at

St. John, New Brunswick, in September, 1869, shows that the rarity of

the 12d was already recognised as witnessed by the fact that "even $5"

could be obtained for a specimen. We give the paragraph in full:--

This stamp, as some of our readers are aware, was in use but a

short time, so short, that many persons even those residing in

Canada, knew nothing about it. One gentleman living in Quebec, to

whom we had written on the subject some time ago, informed us that

we must have been laboring under some mistake, when we asked him

for some particulars about it. He told us that no such stamp was

ever issued; but a subsequent letter from him told a totally

different tale (as was expected)--he gave us a few facts, and that

was all we wanted. It was first intended for postage to England,

and was actually used for a time. The postage was afterwards

reduced and the 10d stamp took the place of the 12d. The latter is

now (the genuine) one of the rarest in existence, and very readily

obtains such prices as $4.00 and even $5.00 for one specimen.

Proofs are often offered for sale on India paper, with the word

'specimen' written on one side. Amateur collections must content

themselves with this last, for it is utterly impossible to obtain

the real Simon Pure article for less than the sums we name, and

even then, it is doubtful whether it can be had at the price or

not. The color of the genuine stamp is black, it is an adhesive,

and contains a portrait of Queen Victoria in an inscribed oval,

with figures 12 at corners.

All three values of this first set were issued imperforate and while the

3d, of which at least three millions were issued, varies but little in

shade, the 6d, printed in comparatively small quantities, provides a

number of striking tints. In his check-list, Mr. Howes gives

"black-violet, deep-violet, slate-violet, brown-violet, dull purple,

slate, black brown, brownish black, and greenish black", and we have no

doubt the list could be considerably amplified, though the above should

be sufficient for the most exacting of specialists.

The catalogue gives two distinct sorts of paper--laid and wove--for all

three values, with a sub-variety of the latter, designated "thin", for

the 3d and 6d denominations. But specialists are not satisfied with this

meagre classification and recognise numerous other varieties such as

thick white laid, soft white wove, thin and thick grayish, thick hard,

thick soft, ribbed, etc. Mr. D. A. King, in his article in the _Monthly

Journal_, says, "There are fourteen varieties that we are able to

distinguish", and he gives a general classification of their

characteristics as follows:--

Series I, II, IV and V.--The texture of these papers is virtually

the same, and it is indeed often difficult, particularly in the

case of the 6d, to distinguish between the _laid_ and _wove_

papers. The lines in the _laid_ paper are of a most peculiar

character, and cannot, as a rule, be brought fairly out by holding

the stamp between one's eyes and the light. The best way to test

these two papers is to lay the stamps, face down, on a black

surface, and let the light strike them at about an angle of fifteen

degrees, when the _laid_ lines are brought most plainly into view.

It is necessary, however, to place the specimens so that the light

will strike them parallel to their length, as the _laid_ lines run

horizontally in the 3d, and vertically in the 6d and 12d.

Series III.--This is an entirely different paper to those mentioned

above. The _laid_ lines are most distinct, while the paper is of a

different texture and color from the regular gray shade.

Series VI.--The paper of this series is almost as thick as that

employed for series XII. There is a vast difference, however, in

its appearance, as the paper of series VI. is much harder than that

of series XII. It feels greasy when rubbed between the thumb and

finger, and the color of the paper is distinctly different from

that shown by series XII.

Series VII, VIII and IX.--We are able to divide the thin-ribbed

papers into three varieties, which the description plainly

indicates. They are very distinct, and can be distinguished by a

moment's inspection without hesitation.

Series X.--This is a very peculiar sort of paper, which is quite

fragile, and will not bear much handling. It is quite as soft as

that of series VII.

Series XI.--This paper is also of a peculiar texture; the surface

presents a sort of hairy appearance, and the quality is better than

Series X, although not as tough as series XII.

Series XII and XIII.--This paper presents, even when looking at the

face of the specimens, so entirely different an appearance to that

employed in any of the other series, that a reference to the back

is hardly necessary. It is found in two thicknesses, which have the

same appearance, and seems to have been employed for all the values

except the 12d.

Series XIV.--We are surprised that this variety has hitherto

escaped notice. It is so distinct, both in paper and color, from

any of the other 6d stamps. It has only been found in shades of a

peculiarly _brownish purple_ which is a color entirely different

from that presented by specimens on any other of the papers

employed. It is an exceedingly rare variety.

It would indeed be a task for the most intrepid of specialists to try

and complete his Canadian stamps on such ambitious lines, to say nothing

of acquiring the ingenuity necessary to differentiate between them.

Their philatelic importance is, in our humble opinion, not a matter of

very great consequence. At that period, hand-made paper was still being

used to a very large extent and even machine-made paper was not

manufactured with the nicety of standardisation that is possible with

the improved machinery of today. Consequently, the sheets of paper, even

in such a small commercial quantity as a ream, would generally show

considerable variation in texture. Thin and thick sheets were frequently

mixed to obtain the necessary weight per ream specified in any

particular grade of paper. No particular quality of paper was,

apparently, specified for the manufacture of these stamps, and so long

as it looked much about the same it is very obvious the printers made no

particular effort to maintain an exact standard. It is even questionable

that the wove and laid varieties mark distinct consignments or printings

of the stamps. Indeed, so far as the 12d is concerned at any rate, both

varieties must have been included in the same consignment. But, more

serious still, from the point of view of those collectors who consider

the wove and laid papers should be treated as major varieties, Mr. King

admits that "the lines in the laid paper are of a most peculiar

character" and that "it is often difficult to distinguish between the

laid and the wove papers", while Mr. Howes states, "It happens sometimes

that it is quite difficult to distinguish the laid paper, a very careful

scrutiny or even the extreme resort to the benzine cup being necessary

to bring out the watermarked lines, and perhaps then only in a half

suspicious way." Writing in the _Canada Stamp Sheet_ (Vol. IV, page

142), concerning the 12d value, Mr. John N. Luff stated, "It is my

opinion that both the wove and laid papers are quite genuine and I think

it is possible that both varieties might occur though there was only one

lot sent out by the printers. It does not, of course, follow that the

entire batch was printed on the same day or that two varieties of paper

may not have been used. The early printers were not always very

particular about their paper, provided it was somewhat alike in a

general way. Some collectors claim that laid paper is often of such

nature that the lines do not show in some parts of the sheet, and I

believe there is evidence to support this theory."

It is quite within the bounds of possibility that the paper generally

used for these stamps was intended to be what is known as "wove" to the

trade, and that the "laid lines" originated in a purely accidental

manner and are rather on the order of the "laid paper" varieties found

in connection with the first 8c and 12c stamps of Sarawak. In short, it

is probable that in some sheets at any rate the laid lines showed only

in part. At best, therefore, it would appear that the "wove" is but a

minor variety of the "laid" or vice versa, and while both varieties, as

well as other varieties easily distinguished, such as the very thin and

very thick, are of interest to specialists, they throw no light

whatsoever on the history of the stamps, and do not, from all the

available facts, represent separate printings, so that their

_philatelic_ importance (aside from comparative rarity as minor

varieties, with its accompanying variation in monetary worth) is not of

a particularly high order.

One peculiarity resulting from the use of papers of such varying quality

is an apparent difference in the size of stamps of the same

denomination. For instance, the stamps on the thinner kinds of paper

generally measure 22 x 18 mm., while those on thicker paper measure

22-3/4 x 17-1/2 mm. and papers of other thicknesses provide still other

measurements. These differences in size (fairly considerable in relation

to the comparatively small area of a postage stamp) proved very puzzling

to collectors of twenty years or so ago for, though it was felt that the

stamps came from the same plates, it was at the same time found

impossible to account for such varieties, except on the hypothesis that

all the impressions of the plate were not all applied alike or that the

hardening of the plates before printing resulted in contraction in parts

with a consequent variation in the size of different impressions. The

same sorts of varieties have been noticed in many other stamps printed

by the line engraved process, notably in such stamps as the "pence"

Ceylons, and proper investigation finally proved beyond a shadow of

doubt that these differences in size were due to nothing more than

uneven contraction of the paper after printing. It must be understood

that in printing stamps by the line-engraved method the paper usually

has to be slightly wetted (this was an invariable rule at the time these

early Canada stamps were printed) and it can be easily seen that the

wetting would have quite different results on different qualities of

paper. Some would be more absorbent than others and would stretch while

damp and contract again when drying. The amount of wetting administered

would, also, result in differences even in the same qualify of paper.

These variations in the size of the design, therefore, while interesting

in themselves as examples of paper vagaries, are of little, if any,

philatelic importance.

Bi-sected stamps were not used in Canada to anything like the same

extent that similar varieties were used in the other British North

American provinces. The 6d is catalogued as having been divided

diagonally and the halves used as 3d stamps, though there can have been

no real necessity for such bi-section. A bi-sected stamp of quite

another character was mentioned in the _Monthly Journal_ for April,

1898, as follows:--

The _Post Office_ describes a so-called "split provisional" of the

early 3d stamp, which is described as consisting of one and a half

of the unperforated 3d on wove, upon an entire envelope postmarked

"Port Hope, July 16th, 1855, Canada, Paid 10c." Our contemporary

does not appear to perceive that the postmark plainly indicates

that the supposed half stamp is really only a badly cut copy; the

3d of Canada passed for 5 cents, and as this letter is plainly

marked "Paid 10c", the stamps upon it evidently passed as two 3d,

not as one and a half, which would have corresponded to no rate of

postage.

The same journal, two months later, made more extended reference to this

variety and while its bona-fides as a "split" is established its use as

a half stamp is as much a mystery as ever. We cannot do better than give

the paragraph in full:--

In the New Issues column of our number for April, we called in

question the character of a supposed "split" _three pence_ stamp of

Canada, which had been chronicled in the _Post Office_, New York.

In reply to our criticism, Messrs. Morgenthau & Co., the publishers

of that magazine, have most kindly forwarded to us the letter

bearing the divided stamp, and have requested our opinion upon it.

The specimen is such a curious one and presents, we think, such a

puzzle for philatelists, that we have taken the liberty--which we

hope its owner will pardon--of having a photographic block made

from it, and we give a full size illustration, showing both the

stamps and the postmarks, herewith. As our readers may perceive, we

were quite wrong in suggesting that the "split" stamp was merely a

badly cut copy, as it appears to have been carefully bi-sected

diagonally and to have been intended to pass as a half stamp,

making up, with the entire stamp to which it is attached, a rate of

4-1/2d. If this were all, though the specimen would be a great

rarity--indeed, we believe it to be unique--it would not be

necessarily a great puzzle to us. It is true that we do not know of

any 4-1/2d rate in Canada, and there never was a 4-1/2d stamp in

use there; but still, such a rate might have existed, although

there was no possible means of making it up except by the use of at

least three 1/2d stamps; but the puzzling part about this letter is

that it is addressed from Port Hope in Canada to New York, the

single rate from Canada to the United States was 10 cents; the

letter is marked "CANADA--_PAID 10 Cts_." by the side of the

stamps, and that rate was sixpence in Canadian currency. The whole

document appears to us to be perfectly genuine and _bona-fide_; we

have examined it with a skeptical mind and a powerful magnifying

glass, and we can only say that if it is a "fake" it is wonderfully

well done. On the other hand, if it is genuine, the half stamp must

have done duty as a whole one, because it certainly took two 3d

stamps to make up the 10 cents rate. The puzzle remains a puzzle to

us, but we are grateful to Messrs. Morgenthau for their courteous

reply to what may have appeared a captious criticism.

_Reference List._

1851. Engraved and printed by Rawdon, Wright, Hatch & Edson,

New York, on laid or wove paper. Imperforate.

1. 3d vermilion, Scott's No. 1 or No. 4.

2. 6d violet, Scott's No. 2 or No. 5.

3. 12d black, Scott's No. 3 or No. 6.

The third report of the Postmaster-General for Canada, dated March 31st,

1854, refers to a change in the rates of postage on single letters sent

abroad and also mentions the possibility of additions to the meagre set

of three values then current, viz.:--

In March, 1854, the charge on packet letters between Canada and the

United Kingdom and most foreign countries was reduced by the

Imperial Government from 1s 2d sterling to 8d sterling the 1/2 oz.,

when sent in the closed mails through the United States, and from

1s sterling to 6d when sent from a provincial port--Quebec and

Halifax. Should no further changes be likely soon to take place in

the charges on the correspondence with England, it would promote

the public convenience to procure postage stamps of the value of

10d and 7-1/2d respectively, to correspond with the present packet

charges.

In the Postmaster-General's fourth annual report, issued in the

following year, the above recommendation was adopted so far as the 10d

value was concerned, for we read:--

To promote the general convenience of the public in prepaying

letters to the United Kingdom at the new rate, postage stamps of

the value of 10d currency, equal to 8d sterling, were procured, and

issued to the public.

[Illustration]

According to documentary evidence unearthed by Messrs. King and Howes

the plate for this value was made, and the first stamps were printed

from it during the last quarter of 1854, for in the Post Office accounts

for that period the item, "Rawdon, Wright & Co., Making Stamps,

£42-18-6," appears. According to another list compiled from official

sources the stamps did not reach Canada until January 2nd, 1855, and

though we know of no official document bearing on the actual date of

issue, or of any very early dated cover, in view of the fact that the

stamps represented a denomination for which there was an urgent demand,

it is only reasonable to suppose that this 10d value was placed on sale

some time during the month of January, 1855.

Mr. King states that this value was printed in sheets of 100 stamps,

arranged in ten horizontal rows of ten, and with the manufacturers'

imprint shown eight times on the margins, as in the case of the three

stamps previously issued. Mr. Howes, however, is of the opinion that

these 10d stamps were printed in sheets of 120, 10 rows of twelve each,

like the 7-1/2d value issued later, and in support of his theory points

out that the quantities delivered in the first supply (100,080) and

second supply (72,120) are exactly divisible by 120 into 834 and 601

full sheets respectively, whereas neither of these numbers is divisible

by 100 into an even number of complete sheets. In view of the absence of

positive evidence in the shape of an entire sheet or full horizontal row

of stamps, it must be admitted that there is much to be said in favor of

Mr. Howes' theory. It will be noted the stamps have the values expressed

in English currency, and the almost universal rule for stamps printed

with values in shillings or pence, has been sheets of 60, 120, or 240

owing to the fact that with such an arrangement reckoning in this

currency is greatly simplified.

The design corresponds in its general appearance to the 6d and 12d of

1851 though the portrait in the central oval is of Jacques Cartier, the

discoverer of Canada. In the 'eighties there was some little discussion

regarding the portrait on this 10d stamp some claiming it was not

intended to represent Cartier, but Sebastian Cabot. A writer on the

_Halifax Philatelist_ for 1888 says: "It is identically the same as all

the existing portraits of Jacques Cartier, and totally unlike those

existing of Sebastian Cabot. The style of dress and the way the beard is

worn is that of the sixteenth century, instead of the fifteenth. There

is a very rare and old print of Sebastian Cabot, taken from the original

painting in the possession of Charles Jost Harford, Esq., in the

Legislative Library at Halifax, and anything more dissimilar to the face

on the 10 pence stamp cannot be imagined." The official notice

announcing the issue of the stamp, to which we have already referred,

makes no mention of the design at all but the portrait is undoubtedly

that of Cartier and Mr. Howes tells us that the original is a

"three-quarter length portrait in the Hotel de Ville at St. Malo,

France, the birthplace of Cartier."

Jacques Cartier was born at St. Malo, as stated above, in 1491. In 1534

he sailed with two small vessels on a voyage of discovery, touching at

Newfoundland, and discovering New Brunswick. In a second voyage (1535-6)

he explored the St. Lawrence, and took possession of the land he

discovered in the name of Francis I of France. He made a third voyage in

1541 and died in 1557.

The words CANADA POSTAGE and TENPENCE on the inscribed oval frame are

separated by a small beaver at the right and three maple leaves at the

left. In the lower corners are the numerals "10" followed by "cy" for

currency, while in each of the upper angles is "8d stg", representing

the equivalent value in sterling.

Only the two supplies of this value, mentioned previously, were printed

making a total of 172,200 stamps. When the decimal currency was

introduced there was a balance on hand of 31,200, which were afterwards

destroyed so that the total quantity of 10d stamps issued was 141,000.

A double-transfer variety of this denomination is described by Mr. Howes

as follows:--

In this case we find the letters A D A and S of "Canada Postage",

and P E N of "Pence"' showing a distinct doubling at the bottom,

the transfer roller having been set a little too high at first and

a very slight impression made on the plate. The stamp has not been

seen in a pair to prove its character absolutely, but it bears all

the ear-marks of being a proper plate variety and not due to a

careless impression when printing.

The Postmaster General's report dated Sept. 30th, 1857, refers to the

many benefits accruing to both the Department and the public by the

increased use of postage stamps in the prepayment of postal charges and

also mentions the issue of two new denominations, viz:--

There is a very material economy of labor to the Department in

dealing with letters prepaid by stamp as compared with letters on

which the postage is collected in money, as well as a manifest gain

to the public, in the increased facilities which prepayment by

stamp enables the Post Office to afford for posting and delivering

letters so prepaid.

It is gratifying, therefore, to observe that the use of stamps is

gradually gaining ground, encouraging as it does the hope that it

may be found practicable and expedient ere long to make prepayment

by stamp the prevailing rule in Canada, as it has for sometime been

in, the United Kingdom, in France, and in the United States.

A reduction in the charge of Book Post Packets when not exceeding 4

oz. in weight, between Canada and the United Kingdom of one-half

the former rate has been made.

To facilitate the prepayment of letters passing from Canada to

England by the Canadian steamers, a new stamp bearing value of 6

pence sterling, or 7-1/2 pence currency, being the Canadian Packet

rate, has been secured and put in circulation.

A new stamp has also been introduced of the value of one halfpenny

to serve as the medium for prepaying transient Newspapers.

Moreover, the Department has been led, by the increasing use of

Postage Stamps, to take measures for obtaining the Canadian Postage

Stamps in sheets perforated in the dividing lines, in the manner

adopted in England, to facilitate the separation of a single stamp

from the others on a sheet when required for use.

It will thus be seen that the 7-1/2d value, which was recommended three

years earlier (at the time the 10d was issued), materialised at last,

though there appears to be no official record bearing on the date the

new value was placed on sale to the public. The volume dealing with the

postage stamps of British North America, published by the Royal

Philatelic Society some twenty years ago, gives the date of issue as

June 2nd, 1857, though no authority for this statement is given.

[Illustration]

The design was adapted from that of the discarded 12d of 1851, the same

portrait of Queen Victoria adorning the central oval. The inscribed

band around this contains the words CANADA PACKET POSTAGE at the top,

and SIX PENCE STERLING at the bottom, the two inscriptions occupying so

much space that there was no room for dividing ornaments of any kind. In

the upper and lower left hand corners is "6d stg." and in the right hand

corners "7-1/2d cy." is shown. A word of explanation regarding the use

of the word PACKET in the inscription is necessary. This does not refer

to any parcel post (indeed, there was no parcel post at that period) as

has sometimes been erroneously asserted, but refers to the fast mail

steamers of the day which were then known as "packets". This

denomination, as shown by the extract from the Postmaster-General's

report printed above, was intended for use on single letters sent to

England via the Canadian packets.

This 7-1/2d stamp was, according to Mr. Howes, printed in sheets of 120

arranged in ten horizontal rows of twelve each, each sheet showing the

imprint of the manufacturers eight times on the margins as in the case

of the values issued previous to 1857. Only one consignment, consisting

of 834 sheets (100,800 stamps) was received, and as 17,670 of these were

still on hand when the decimal currency was introduced in 1859, a simple

calculation will show that the total quantity issued was 82,410 stamps.

Although there had been a real need for a halfpenny value since the

first adhesives made their appearance in Canada--as shown by several

rates it was impossible to prepay in stamps without them--it was not

until 1857 that a stamp of this denomination was placed in use. The

following circular announced their impending issue:--

POSTAGE ON NEWSPAPERS AND PERIODICALS.

POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT.

TORONTO. _18th July, 1857._

Under the Post Office Law of last Session taking effect from 1st

August, 1857, Newspapers printed and published in Canada, and

mailed direct from Office of Publication, will pass free of

Canadian Postage.

Periodicals so printed, published, and mailed when specially

devoted to Religious and to General Education, to Agriculture, or

Temperance, or to any branch of Science, will pass free from any

one Post-Office to another within the Province.

Transient and re-mailed Papers and Periodicals will pass by Post if

prepaid by Postage stamp--one halfpenny if not exceeding 3 oz. in

weight, and 2d if over 3 oz.

Postage Stamps of the value of one halfpenny each will be sold to

the public at all the principal Post Offices (including all Money

Order Offices), with a discount of 5 per cent. upon purchases of

not less than twenty stamps and will be available in prepayment of

Newspapers and Periodicals, and of Drop and Town Letters.

R. SPENCE, Postmaster-General.

The Royal Philatelic Society's book gives the date of the above

notice--July 18th, 1857--as the date of issue of the new stamp but, as

Mr. Howes observes "it is more likely that the stamp was issued on 1st

August, the day the new rates took effect."

Although this stamp is generally conceded to be the last of the "pence"

values to be issued, until more definite information regarding the date

of issue of the 7-1/2d can be procured, this supposition can rest on no

more substantial basis than that of mere conjecture.

[Illustration]

The design is quite unlike that of any of the other values expressed in

pence and consists of the conventional profile portrait of the Queen

shown on so many of the stamps of the British Empire, within an oval

band inscribed CANADA POSTAGE, at the top, and ONE HALF PENNY, at the

bottom. There are no numerals or inscriptions in the corners but merely

a plain pattern of diagonally crossed lines. Mr. Howes states "the stamp

was printed in sheets of 100, ten rows of ten, with the right marginal

imprints as described for the series of 1851."

From the Postmaster-General's report we gather that 1,341,600 halfpenny

stamps were received prior to October 1st, 1857, though whether these

were all in one consignment or not is not quite clear. At any rate

judging from the statement in the same report that "the Department has

been led to take measures for obtaining ... sheets perforated" it would

appear that the above quantity comprised all the imperforate stamps of

this denomination. On the other hand the total number of halfpenny

stamps issued was 3,389,960 and catalogue quotations for the imperforate

and the perforated varieties hardly bear out the supposition that only

the first lot were issued without perforation.

While the 10d value is found on several sorts of paper no such extreme

variation is provided as in the case of the stamps of 1851. The 7-1/2d

and 1/2d values, printed at a later date, provide still fewer varieties,

which would seem to indicate that as time progressed the manufacturers

exercised a nicer discrimination in their choice of paper. Most of the

stamps seem to have been printed on a hard wove paper, varying a little

in thickness; the 10d is found on a very thin paper; and the 1/2d is

recorded on ribbed paper, though whether this is a true "ribbed" variety

or merely the result of some peculiarity in printing is open to

discussion. As the ribbed lines are anything but distinct, though the

paper showing this peculiarity is a little softer than that generally

used, it is more than likely that the ribbing was purely accidental.

Owing to the differing qualities of paper used the same idiosyncrasies

of measurement in the size of the designs may be noted, especially in

the case of the 10d as was referred to in a previous chapter. But as all

variations of this character in stamps printed from line-engraved plates

were long ago conclusively proved to be due to nothing more exciting

than paper shrinkage it is hardly worth while wearying our readers with

a resurrection of all that has been written on the subject leading up to

the proof. While examples showing the extremes of size are of interest

in a specialised collection little can be said in favor of their

philatelic value.

_Reference List._

1855-57. Engraved and printed by Rawdon, Wright, Hatch & Edson,

New York, on wove paper. Imperforate.

4. 1/2d pink, Scott's No. 8.

5. 7-1/2d green, Scott's No. 9.

6. 10d blue, Scott's No. 7.

CHAPTER V.--_The Perforated Pence Stamps._

In the Report of the Postmaster-General for September 30th, 1857, to

which we have already made reference, we read:--

Moreover, the Department has been led, by the increasing use of

Postage Stamps, to take measures for obtaining the Canadian Postage

Stamps in sheets perforated in the dividing lines, in the manner

adopted in England, to facilitate the separation of a single stamp

from the others on a sheet when required for use.

From the above statement, one would naturally infer that such a useful

innovation would be adopted at once, especially so when it is considered

that the utility and convenience of perforation had already been amply

tested and had proved eminently satisfactory in England. Unfortunately,

no further mention of perforation is made in the Reports of succeeding

years, and this absence of direct official evidence combined with the

existence of certain facts has given rise to much theorising as to the

actual date of issue of the perforated varieties, and as to whether the

perforation was applied by the manufacturers of the stamps, by the

Canadian Government, or by private parties in Canada.

Mr. Donald A. King in his article in the _Monthly Journal_ says:--

It is an open question whether these stamps were delivered to the

Canadian Post Office Department in a perforated condition or not.

The manufacturers are wholly unable to throw any light on the

subject; and while there is much to be said in favor of their

having perforated the stamps, there are points against it almost as

strong.

In favor of it there is the fact that, at the date that these

stamps were issued, it was more than probable that a firm like the

manufacturers would have perforating machines. The normal gauge of

the perforated set is 12, that being the only size ever used by the

manufacturers, or their successors, the American Bank Note Company;

indeed, they call 12 their standard and only gauge.

On the other hand, we find that there are perforated stamps of the

first series issued, viz., the 6d on _laid_ paper; also, that there

exist two different varieties of perforation that were never used

by the makers, viz., one gauging 14, and another that is described

in the _American Journal of Philately_ for January, 1891, as

follows:--

"CANADA.--In a large lot of pence issues, purchased by us lately,

we have found two copies of the 3d. on greyish wove paper,

perforated 13, with oblique parallel cuts. This seems to confirm

the theory that the pence issues of Canada were not perforated by

the manufacturers, but either by the Canadian Government, or by

some persons authorized by them, who most likely experimented with

different perforating machines, finally selecting the one

perforating 12."

Considering these facts, it may be that the stamps were sent to

Canada in an imperforate condition, and that the Post Office

Department had them perforated there, either buying a perforating

machine, or entrusting them to some manufacturers of stationery.

Perforations gauging 13 and 14 may have been experimental, as

specimens of these varieties are rare; perforation 12 being adopted

as giving the best results, the other sizes not being at all

clearly cut, as the 12 generally is. All the stock of 1/2d, 3d and

6d on hand would, in this case, have been perforated, which might

account for the copy of the 6d on laid paper that is known in this

condition. There always remains the query why the 7-1/2d and 10d

were not treated in the same manner, and to this no answer can be

given. Probably the safest theory to advance, and the one that I

think is correct, is that the 12 gauge was the official one used by

the manufacturers, and that the 13 and 14 were the result of

private enterprise by people using large quantities of stamps, and

they may possibly antedate the regularly perforated issue. This

point can only be settled by copies being found on the original

covers.

In commenting on the above it will save undue confusion if we state that

the copy of the perforated 6d on laid paper to which Mr. King refers was

proved to be a forgery as shown by the following extract from the

_American Journal of Philately_ for 1891:--

There is no longer any mystery in regard to the origin of that

_great rarity!_ the perforated 6 pence on laid paper, these stamps

having been perforated for four or five years in the shop of

Messrs. Benjamin, Sarpy & Co., Cullum street, London, who openly

boast of having manufactured and sold those in the collection of

the late Hon. T. K. Tapling and other prominent collectors.

With regard to the varieties perforated 13 and 14--while these are

undoubtedly rare, all the evidence strongly points to the fact that they

are unofficial varieties, a statement, we believe, which has never been

seriously combated by students of the early Canadian stamps.

Thus, most of the "contrary" evidence adduced by Mr. King carries no

weight with it at all. The most interesting point he raises is the fact

that, though the 7-1/2d and 10d denominations were current at the same

time as the 1/2d, 3d and 6d, these values were not perforated. So far as

the 10d is concerned this seems all the more strange when it is

considered that one supply of this value was certainly printed after

September, 1857, the date of the Report mentioning the adoption of

perforation.

Mr. Howes has made diligent search through official records and

carefully scanned itemised reports of more or less petty expenditures,

and he was unable to find any reference whatsoever to a disbursement

such as would have been necessary had the Government purchased a

perforating machine or had the stamps perforated by some private

concern. It is, therefore, unquestionable that the natural course--i.

e., that the manufacturers should perforate the stamps--was the one

followed.

The real root cause of all the problems surrounding these perforated

stamps seems to lie in the general acceptance of the assumption that

they were issued in 1857 or early in 1858--an assumption that appears to

be entirely devoid of the support of tangible facts when the matter is

scrutinised thoroughly. Mr. Howes has delved into the subject with his

usual thoroughness and his deductions are so well founded that we

imagine no unbiased student will venture to do other than agree that his

findings are fully borne out by the history of the stamps so far as we

know it. We, therefore, make no apology for reproducing his arguments in

full:--

The date usually assigned to the appearance of the perforated

stamps is January, 1858. The London Society gave simply "1857,"

which is apparently set down merely because they have just quoted

the announcement from the Postmaster General's Report for that

year. Evans and Moens, in their catalogues, both name the date as

November, 1858. Unfortunately, no more authoritative statement has

been found, except that in Messrs. Corwin and King's article they

say "Mr. Hooper positively states that it took place in January,

1858." Mr. John R. Hooper was at that time (1890) connected with

the Canadian Post Office Department at Ottawa and took pains to

look up much information for the above-mentioned gentlemen. His

reasons for the "positive statement" are not given, and inasmuch as

he is quoted elsewhere as saying that "the records of the Post

Office Department are silent as to where this perforation was

performed and by whom," and also seems a little uncertain in some

other details, we feel that further confirmation is needed.

In our table above we have given the supplies received after the 30th

September, 1857, and deducted the remainders so as to have the actual

number issued. The 10d has already proved a stumbling block, for it was

not perforated at all! Next we find the 6d to the number of 150,000,

when the total issue, including the laid paper, was but 400,000; yet the

catalogue value of the imperforates is some $6 for each variety, and of

the perforated stamp at least $30! Can anyone doubt that all these

150,000 6d stamps were _not_ perforated? In the case of the 3d we have

one and a third millions to compare with a total issue of three and a

half millions--about a third in the supposed perforated class. Yet the

catalogue value of the latter is $2.50 against 36 cents for the wove

paper imperforate alone. With the 1/2d stamp there are two millions

against a total of three and a third millions, or about two to one in

favor of the supposed perforated stamps, yet the latter are double the

catalogue price of the former! The only conclusion to be drawn from

these regularly appearing inconsistencies in each value is that all the

supplies after 30th September, 1857, were _not_ perforated, as the 10d

stamp very glaringly intimates!

If this be so, is it not possible that the order to perforate the new

supplies was given to the manufacturers much later than has hitherto

been thought to be the case? It hardly seems likely that this

improvement would be ordered for a few supplies and then dropped, only

to re-appear a year and a half later as a permanent feature of the new

set. Once adopted it was more than likely to be retained.

Let us see, then, just for curiosity's sake, what the supplies of the

last six months of issue yield us for data. For the 1/2d we find 850,000

roughly, with 60,000 remainders. Call it 800,000 issued which, if

perforated, would be a quarter of the total issue of 1/2d stamps, or a

ratio to the imperforates of one to three. This is not so far away from

the catalogue ratio of two to one (inversely, of course,) in the value

of the perforated stamps. With the 3d stamp we have 450,000 roughly,

with 20,000 remainders, say 430,000 issued. Of a total issue of

3,500,000 this represents one-eighth, or a ratio of one to seven. The

inverse ratio of seven to one for catalogue value comes pretty close

when we compare $2.50 with 36 cents! In the case of the 6d there are

70,000, less 17,500 remainders, or 52,500. This is approximately

one-eighth the total issue of 400,000, or again a ratio of one in seven.

The inverse ratio of seven to one for a catalogue value would make the

perforated stamp list $42 with the imperforate at $6. But both laid and

wove paper 6d stamps list at approximately $6, whereas, if all had been

issued on but one variety of paper, we might find, perhaps, a single

list price of, say $4. With this as a basis, the catalogue value of $30

for the perforated 6d is in as close agreement with our supposition as

are the others. And, best of all, the second supply of the 10d stamp is

disposed of without any difficulty whatever under this hypothesis!

It may be argued that reasoning thus from catalogue prices is too

uncertain to prove of value. Granted in many cases. But here is an issue

from fifty to sixty years old; the stamps were regularly used in

increasing numbers during their years of issue; they have always been

popular and eagerly collected, so that the stock in existence has been

pretty well handled and pretty well distributed. Under these conditions

the catalogue prices should by this time reflect fairly accurately the

_relative_ rarity of the main varieties of each stamp at least; and it

is this relative rarity that we are after in order to approximate the

original supplies of the main varieties. The result is certainly of more

than mere interest, the agreement being such that we are tempted to lay

down the following propositions in regard to the perforated stamps for

further proof or disproof:--

_First._ The regular perforation (gauge 12) was done by the

manufacturers and applied to the last requisitions previous to the

change to decimal stamps.

_Second._ The date of the supposed issue of the perforated stamps

should be changed from January, 1858, to November, 1858, or

January, 1859.

_Third._ The quantities of perforated stamps issued are placed

approximately at:--1/2d, 789,440; 3d, 428,200; 6d. 52,422. In

further support of the above postulates, we must say that every

cover bearing any one of the three perforated stamps which we have

been able to get a satisfactory date from has been postmarked in

_1859!_ Not one has yet been seen which bore a date in 1858 even,

and one 6d from the Seybold collection, which was dated at

Brantford, December 29, 1857, turned out to be bad. Of course,

perforated stamps are hard to find on original covers, but it is

curious that so far not one has upset the theory we have laid down.

These three perforated stamps do not provide much variation in the

quality of the paper. Most of the stamps are found on a hard wove paper,

varying slightly in thickness, and though the 1/2d and 3d are listed on

ribbed paper, we venture to doubt that this is a true ribbed paper for

the reasons set forth in our last chapter.

Mr. King records the 6d bi-sected diagonally and the halves used as 3d

stamps, but, as in the case of the similar variety in the imperforate

issues, there could have been no real need for such bi-section.

_Reference List._

1858-9. Stamps of preceding issues perforated 12.

7. 1/2d pink, Scott's No. 11.

8. 3d red, Scott's No. 12.

9. 6d violet, Scott's No. 13.

CHAPTER VI.--_The First "Cents" Issue._

While the somewhat cumbrous English currency of pounds, shillings and

pence has presented little or no difficulty in those parts of the Empire

where it has always been on the same basis as in the Mother country, the

fact that in Canada it had two valuations--"currency" and

"sterling"--made it an inevitable conclusion that a change would have to

be made sooner or later. The close proximity of Canada to the United

States gave it a very practical illustration of the advantages of a

decimal system of money; the American currency of dollars and cents was

legalised in the Province of Canada in 1853; and it is, therefore, small

matter for wonder that ultimately a decimal system of currency similar

to that in vogue in the United States was adopted. This change took

place in 1859 and the Postmaster-General's Report for that year alluded

to the necessary changes in the postage stamps as follows:

The Law of last Session directing the conversion of all postage

rates into decimals, and the collection of postage in the new

decimal currency, was put in operation on the 1st July. Decimal

stamps of the value of 1 cent, 5 cents, and 10 cents for ordinary

correspondence, and of 12-1/2 cents for Canadian, and of 17 cents

for British Packet Postage Rates were obtained in readiness for the

commencement of the Decimal Postage Law in July, 1859, and have

from that date been issued in lieu of the stamps previously in use.

The Law referred to on the above mentioned Report was assented to on May

4th, 1859, and as some of the provisions are of philatelic interest we

reproduce them as follows:--

1.--There shall be payable on all Newspapers sent by Post in

Canada, except "Exchange Papers" addressed to Editors and

Publishers of Newspapers, such rate of Postage, not exceeding one

cent on each such Newspaper, as the Governor in Council shall from

time to time direct by regulation and such rate shall be payable on

all such Newspapers, posted on or after the first day of July next.

2.--So much of any Act as provides that Newspapers posted within

this Province shall pass free of postage, in cases other than those

in which they will be free under this Act is hereby repealed.

3.--In order to adapt the operations of the Post Office to the

Decimal Currency, the internal letter postage rate shall be changed

from three pence to its equivalent of five cents, per half

ounce--the charge for advertising a dead letter from three

farthings to two cents--the charge for returning a dead letter to

the writer, from one penny to three cents; and in all cases where a

one halfpenny or penny rate of Postage is chargeable, these rates

shall be changed to one cent and two cents respectively.

4.--To promote simplicity and economy in the business of the Post

Office, all letters posted in Canada for any place within the

Province, and not prepaid, shall be charged seven instead of five

cents per half ounce on delivery; and on letters posted for the

British Mails, for the other British North American Provinces, or

for the United States, when not prepaid, there shall be charged

such addition to the ordinary rate, not in any case exceeding a

double rate, as the Post Master General may agree upon with the

Post Office Authorities of those Countries, for the purpose of

enforcing prepayment.

5.--The Post Master General may establish a Parcel Post and parcels

other than letters and not containing letters, may be sent by such

Parcel Post, and when so sent shall be liable to such charges for

conveyance and to such regulations as the Governor in Council shall

from time to time see fit to make.

It will be noted that the above Act, aside from showing the rates in the

new currency as compared with the old, provides for a greater limitation

of the privilege of free transmission of newspapers, and also provides

for the establishment of a Parcel Post.

No further reference seems to have been made to the parcel post until

the Postmaster-General's Report for June 30th, 1864, where it is

stated:--

By means of the Parcel Post a parcel may be sent within the

Province to or from any place, however remote from the ordinary

lines of traffic conveyance, on prepayment of a postage rate of 25

cents per lb., provided that the weight or size of the parcel does

not exceed the carrying capacity of an ordinary mail bag; and

provided that the contents of the parcel are not of a character to

injure the rest of the mail.

Later the parcel post system was extended so that it embraced the sister

Provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, the rate remaining at 25c

per lb. Apparently the weight and size of a parcel acceptable by the

postal authorities still remained delightfully vague and indefinite and

was simply limited by "the carrying capacity of an ordinary mail bag."

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

As we have seen from the Postmaster-General's Report for 1859 the first

"cents" stamps were placed in use on July 1st of that year. The series

comprised the values 1c, 5c, 10c, 12-1/2c and 17c these corresponding to

the 1/2d, 3d, 6d, 7-1/2d and 10d denominations previously in use. The

designs of the new stamps were adapted from those of the corresponding

values of the old issue as a comparison of the two series will amply

demonstrate. The 1c differs from the 1/2d only in the words denoting the

value below the portrait. The 5c differs from the 3d not only as regards

the new inscription of value but has small ornaments on the oval band

dividing CANADA POSTAGE from FIVE CENTS. In the corners the numerals

"5," replacing "3," are placed in an oblique position on a ground of

crossed lines. The 10c differs from the 6d in having the corner numerals

(represented by the Roman "X") placed obliquely on a cross hatched

ground instead of upright on a ground of foliate ornamentation, while

TEN CENTS replaces SIX PENCE under the portrait. The 12-1/2c differs

from the 7-1/2d only as regards the corners where "12-1/2c" replaces the

former values of "6d. stg" and "7-1/2d cy". On the new 17c the words of

value required so much more room than the TEN PENCE on the old

denomination that the emblems between the upper and lower inscriptions

on the oval were retired in favor of small elliptical ornaments. The

upper corners were unaltered but in the lower ones "10cy" was removed

and "17" substituted.

[Illustration]

It is obvious that the original dies were made use of in each case, the

central portions being retained and new orders engraved.

The stamps were manufactured by the American Bank Note Company, of New

York, which firm had succeeded to the business established by Messrs.

Rawdon, Wright, Hatch and Edson. The new firm name came into effect on

May 1st, 1858.

The stamps were printed in sheets of 100 by the line-engraved process

the manufacturers' imprint, "American Bank Note Co., New York" appearing

twice in each margin in very small letters. For some reason or other no

imprint was applied to the plate for the 17c value.

In the Law relating to the adoption of decimal currency, reproduced

above, we read in section 3 that "in all cases where a one-half penny or

penny rate of Postage is chargeable, these rates shall be changed to one

cent and two cents respectively." Yet, though a 1c stamp was included in

the series in 1859 no 2c made its appearance until 1864. This new value

was issued on August 1st, 1864, according to the Postmaster-General's

Report for that year while the Report for the following year states that

"A provision has been made for the transmission and delivery of Canadian

periodicals, addressed to the United Kingdom, at the reduced rate of two

cents each" and it is probably due to the increased demand for the 2c

denomination under this new rate that the stamp made its appearance.

[Illustration]

The design was evidently copied from the 1c though the addition of

numerals in each of the lower corners gives it a strikingly different

appearance from that of the lower value. Curiously enough the 2c was

printed in almost the same color as the 1c and in commenting on this

fact the _Stamp Collectors' Magazine_ for October 1st, 1864, stated:--

We are surprised that a different hue was not chosen for the 2

cents, and should imagine its great similarity to the 1 cent,

should the latter not be withdrawn from circulation, would tend to

create confusion.

This new denomination was printed in sheets of 100 like the others of

the series, and also had eight imprints in the margins.

A close study of these stamps should reveal many points of interest. For

many years a double transfer of the 5c, of a similar character to that

found on its predecessor the 3d has been known. This is recorded in

Scott's catalogue as a "double transfer" while Gibbons notes it as a

variety "with extra line in outer oval at left". This variety, which is

simply the most prominent of many double transfers found in connection

with this 5c stamp, shows the outer line of the oval at left distinctly

doubled, and the frame lines above are also double. Other varieties

which, though not so prominent, are of equal philatelic importance are

found. We have seen the following and have no doubt many others exist:--

(1) There are distinct traces of doubling in the letters ADA and POST of

CANADA POSTAGE, in the numerals in the upper angles, and of the lines of

the oval band.

(2) There is a faint doubling of the outer frame lines at the top right

hand corner.

(3) There is a similar doubling of the outer frame lines affecting the

lower right hand corner.

(4) The lines of the oval band are faintly doubled at the lower left.

(5) The letters POST of POSTAGE, the "5" above, and the lines of oval

and frame all show distinct signs of double transferring.

(6) This double transfer affects the lines, numeral, and letters NADA of

CANADA at the upper left corner and while not so distinct as No. 5 is

nevertheless a true plate variety.

We have found no traces of double transfers in the other denominations

except a slight one on the 12-1/2c. This shows a slight doubling of the

frame lines in the top left corner, as well as traces of colored lines

in the adjacent "12-1/2c". It is quite probable that any collector

having sufficient material would find "doubles" in all of these values.

In laying down the impressions on the plate or plates for the 5c value a

guide dot was applied to the transfer roll. This occupied such a

position that as each succeeding impression was applied to the plate it

fell so that the guide dot would fall about the centre of the C of

CENTS. Consequently, the vast majority of these stamps show a

conspicuous dot of color in the position indicated. The stamps without

the colored dot are, usually, those from the extreme left vertical row

of the sheet. On this same value--the 5c--we have seen specimens with

colored dots outside and slightly to the left of the lower left corner.

These are possibly plate dots marked to indicate where each row should

commence. Varieties with broken frame lines are not uncommon and these

may be due in part to defective transfers and in part to wear. Extreme

wear is also shown, in some instances, by the numerals appearing on an

almost plain ground.

Whether guide dots were used for the other denominations or not we

cannot say. At any rate if they were used they were applied in such a

position as to be completely hidden by some part or other of the

designs. A small peculiarity in the 10c is worth noting. On the majority

of specimens there is a slight defect or break in the outer line of the

oval band above and to the right of the O of POSTAGE. This is probably

due to a minute defect on the transfer-roll impression. Many specimens

of the 12-1/2c value show the tongue of the E of POSTAGE the same length

as the upper and lower arms though the end is generally covered with a

colored smudge. We are at a loss to account for the cause of this

variety but that it is a "constant" one we have satisfied ourselves by

the examination of a number of identical specimens. The 17c also

exhibits a small peculiarity of engraving. A colored line projects

upwards into the uncolored oval band above the space between OS of

POSTAGE. This was evidently caused by an accidental touch of the

engraver's tool on the die for it is quite distinct on every specimen we

have examined.

The paper upon which the stamps of this series were printed does not

provide so much variation as that of the earlier emissions. Mr. D. A.

King in his article in the _Monthly Journal_ says:

The papers upon which these stamps are printed may be divided into

five classes:

I.--Ordinary, coarse, white wove paper.

II.--Similar paper, of a yellowish tint, and slightly ribbed.

III.--A hard greyish paper, very slightly ribbed.

IV.--White wove paper, very slightly ribbed.

V.--A white paper, very hard and closely ribbed.

In addition we are told that all the above varieties come in at least

two thicknesses. Scott's catalogue is content with a classification of

"wove" paper with a sub-variety of "ribbed" for the 1c and 5c

denominations. Mr. Howes extends the "ribbed" variety to all values but,

as we have pointed out in earlier chapters, it is extremely unlikely

that any such variety as a real ribbed paper was used, the ribbed lines

being simply due to some idiosyncrasy of manufacture. To again quote Mr.

King:

The best way to distinguish this paper from the others that have

the appearance of ribbing, is to hold the stamp before a strong

light, when the ribbing will appear like fine horizontal laid lines

on the 5c, and vertical laid lines in the other values. Looking

through the paper is the only sure test, as many of the stamps on

the other papers have the appearance of being ribbed.

To differentiate between stamps on ribbed paper and those having the

"appearance" of being ribbed is surely getting very close to the

ridiculous.

With the exception of the 10c the stamps of this issue provide but

little variation in shade but the 10c more than makes up for this lack

in the others for it exists in almost every conceivable tint from bright

red-lilac through shades of violet and brown to a brown so intense as to

be catalogued as a distinct variety described as "black-brown".

All the stamps of this series were normally perforated 12 by single line

machines. All values are known entirely imperforate and it would seem

that these, or most of them, are perfectly legitimate errors. The

_Philatelic Record_ for October, 1882, says:--"We have seen a used

_imperforate_ copy of the 5 cents, 1859, which is beyond challenge". Mr.

King states:--"The imperforate varieties are all legitimate, and

undoubtedly genuine, having been seen in pairs, or in single copies with

margins beyond cavil". Mr. Charles L. Pack writing in the _London

Philatelist_ regarding these varieties says:--

I have the 1c and 5c postmarked in 1860 and 1861 at Toronto and

Prescott, Canada West. I also believe that these varieties were on

sale at Kingston, Canada West, at about that time. I have also the

2c and 10c in undoubtedly early used condition.

Bi-sected varieties of the 5c and 10c of this issue are known though, as

Mr. Howes states of these varieties, they "were never authorised and

seldom used". The _Philatelic Record_ for October, 1888, mentions a part

of a cover with a 10c and half of a 5c side by side which were evidently

used in prepayment of the 12-1/2c rate, while Mr. Howes records the

existence of a pair of the 5c used with a half stamp of the same

denomination to make up the 12-1/2c packet rate. The same writer records

a diagonal half of the 10c used as a 5c stamp from Bowmanville, Upper

Canada, on February 15th, 1860. Whether these "splits" were the work of

private parties or were made by postal officials to fill a temporary

shortage of certain values will probably never be known.

_Reference List._

1859-64. Engraved and Printed by the American Bank Note Co.,

New York, on white wove paper. Perforated 12.

10. 1c pink, Scott's No. 14.

11. 2c rose, Scott's No. 18.

12. 5c vermilion, Scott's No. 15.

13. 10c lilac, Scott's No. 16.

14. 12-1/2c green, Scott's No. 19.

15. 17c blue, Scott's No. 20.

CHAPTER VII.--_The First Dominion Issue._

The steady growth of Upper Canada, chiefly due to immigration, until it

had twice the population of its sister Province, Lower Canada, aroused

cries for a readjusted representation, which threatened the French with

a hopeless minority in Parliament and the country with another impasse.

The federation of all the provinces under something like the American

system was the only solution; and with, for the most part, the cordial

coöperation of the maritime provinces, the great scheme was carried

through, and the new dominion launched in 1867. Each province retained

its local autonomy and separate legislature under a lieutenant-governor,

always a Canadian, nominated by the federal executive. To the latter was

reserved all great affairs, such as defense, customs, Crown lands,

Indians, and the organisation of the vast western territories then just

beginning to open up.

The famous Sir John Macdonald, the most illustrious of Canadian

statesmen, was prominent in the federal movement, as also was Sir

Charles Tupper. A final meeting was held in London, and early in 1867

the British North America Act was passed through the Imperial

Parliament. The new capital was fixed at Bytown, a small town up the

Ottawa well removed from the frontier, fairly central to all the

provinces, and felicitously rechristened Ottawa. Here were erected the

stately houses of parliament for senate, commons, and the entire

government staff, familiar to all travellers, and there, too, the

governor-general of all British North America took up his residence,

Lord Monck being the first to hold this high office, and Sir John

Macdonald the first premier.

The British North America Act, referred to above, provided for the

division of the Dominion of Canada into four provinces named Ontario,

Quebec, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick and also made provision for the

admission of Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, British Columbia, etc.,

when such admission should be deemed advisable. The Act went into force

on July 1st, 1867, and as a mark of the importance of this event the

first day of July is now a national holiday known as "Dominion Day".

It only remains to say that Prince Edward Island, British Columbia and

Manitoba (not then organised) came into the federation shortly

afterwards.

One of the chief duties of the first Parliament, which met at Ottawa on

November 6th, 1867, was the revision and consolidation of the laws of

the various provinces now federated, and amongst these were, of course,

the laws relating to the Post Office. The Act passed for the regulation

of the postal service is a lengthy one and the only provisions of

special interest to us as philatelists, those relating to the rates of

postage,--are more clearly and definitely tabulated in a Department

Order issued from Ottawa on March 1st, 1868, to which we shall make

reference later. Before doing so, however, we make a short extract from

the Post Office Act insofar as it relates to definitions of various

terms and expressions, viz.:--

The term "Letter" includes Packets of Letters;

The term "Postage" means the duty or sum chargeable for the

conveyance of Post Letters, Packets and other things by Post;

The term "Foreign Country" means any country not included in the

dominions of Her Majesty;

The term "Foreign Postage" means the postage on the conveyance of

Letters, Packets or other things, within any Foreign Country or

payable to any Foreign Government;

The term "Canada Postage" means the postage on the conveyance of

Letters, Packets and other things by Post within the Dominion of

Canada or by Canada Mail Packet;

The term "Mail" includes every conveyance by which Post Letters are

carried, whether it be by land or water;

The term "British Packet Postage" means the postage due on the

conveyance of letters by British Packet Boats, between the United

Kingdom and British North America:--And the term "British Postage"

includes all Postage not being Foreign, Colonial or Canadian;

The term "Post Letter" means any letter transmitted or deposited in

any Post Office to be transmitted by Post:--And a letter shall be

deemed a Post Letter from the time of its being deposited or

delivered at a Post Office, to the time of its being delivered to

the party to whom it is addressed.

The Department Order addressed to "All Postmasters, and Other Persons

Employed in the Postal Service of Canada" dealt chiefly with the rates

of postage and as these are important we feel it is necessary to

reproduce most of this rather lengthy document _in extenso:_--

PRINCIPAL RATES OF POSTAGE.

LETTERS.

5.--On letters passing between any two places within the Dominion

of Canada, a uniform rate (irrespective of distance), of three

cents per 1/2 oz., if prepaid; and five cents per 1/2 oz. if

unpaid.

6.--On letters between any place in the Dominion and any place in

the United States, 6 cents per 1/2 oz., if prepaid; and ten cents

per 1/2 oz. if unpaid.

7.--On letters to or from the United Kingdom, in Mails by Canada

Packets, to or from Quebec in summer, or Portland in winter; or by

Mail Packet to or from Halifax, 12-1/2c per 1/2 oz.

On do. in Mails via New York Packet, 15 cents per 1/2 oz.

On letters to Prince Edward Island, if prepaid, 3 cents per 1/2

oz.; if posted unpaid, 5 cents per 1/2 oz.

On letters to Newfoundland, to be in all cases prepaid, 12-1/2c per

1/2 oz.

On letters to British Columbia and Vancouver Island, in all cases

to be prepaid, 10 cents per 1/2 oz.

On letters to Red River, to be in all cases prepaid, 6 cents per

1/2 oz.

NEWSPAPER RATES.

8.--Newspapers printed and published in Canada may be sent by Post

from the office of publication to any place in Canada at the

following rates, if paid quarterly in advance, either by the

Publisher, at the Post Office where the papers are posted, or by

the subscriber, at the Post Office where the papers are

delivered:--

For a paper published once a week, 5 cents per quarter of a year.

For a paper published twice a week, 10 cents per quarter.

For a paper published three times, 15 cents per quarter.

For a paper published six times, 30 cents per quarter.

If the above rates are prepaid by the Publisher, the Postmaster

receiving payment must be careful to have the papers so prepaid

separately put up, and marked, distinctly, as prepaid.

When the above rates are not prepaid in advance, by either the

Publisher at the office of posting or by the subscriber at the

office of delivery, the papers are to be charged one cent each on

delivery.

9.--Canadian Newspapers, addressed from the Office of publication

to subscribers in the United Kingdom, the United States, Prince

Edward Island and Newfoundland, may be forwarded, on prepayment at

the Office in Canada where posted, at the above commuted rates,

applicable to such papers within the Dominion.

10.--Exchange Papers passing between publishers in Canada, between

publishers in Canada and publishers in the United States, Prince

Edward Island and Newfoundland, are to pass free--one copy of each

paper to each publisher.

11.--Transient Newspapers include all Newspapers posted in Canada,

other than Canadian Newspapers sent from the Office of publication,

and when addressed to any place within the Dominion, to the United

Kingdom, to the United States, Prince Edward Island or

Newfoundland, must be prepaid two cents each by postage stamp.

12.--Newspapers coming into Canada will be subject to the following

charges on delivery:--

If from the United Kingdom, by mail packet to Quebec, Halifax or

Portland--Free on delivery.

By mails via the United States (New York), two cents each.

If from the United States, two cents each, to be rated at the

Canada Frontier, or exchange office receiving mails from the United

States.

If from Prince Edward Island or Newfoundland, when received by

regular subscribers in Canada from the Office of publication, the

ordinary commuted rates applicable to Canada Newspapers.

Transient Papers--two cents each.

13.--The Canada Postage rates on Newspapers coming or going to the

United Kingdom and the United States, will thus be the same as

those charged in the United Kingdom and the United States on

Newspapers there received from or sent to Canada.

14.--Canada News Agents may post to regular subscribers in Canada,

British Newspapers free, and United States Newspapers unpaid, such

papers in the latter case, must be duly rated two cents each for

collection on delivery.

PRINTED PAPERS, CIRCULARS, PRICES CURRENT, HAND BILLS, BOOKS,

PAMPHLETS.

15.--The rate on printed matter of this description posted in

Canada, and addressed to any place in Canada, Prince Edward Island,

Newfoundland or the United States, will be one cent per ounce, to

be prepaid by Postage Stamp; and a like rate will be payable on

delivery, when received from the United States, Prince Edward

Island or Newfoundland.

PERIODICAL PUBLICATIONS.

The Stamps of Canada · 第 31 / 33 章