COMPARATIVE TABLE OF ANCIENT AND MODERN NOMENCLATURE OF CRANIAL NERVES.

_Mondino and Manfredi following Galen, |

especially in the_ περὶ χρείας τω̑ν ἐν | _Modern usage._

ἀνθρώπου σώματι μορίων. _De usu partium |

corporis humani._ |

---------------------------------------+----------------------------

Not regarded as separate nerves. | I. Olfactory nerves.

---------------------------------------+----------------------------

I. τὰ μαλακὰ νευ̑ρα τω̑ν ὀφθαλμω̑ν. | II. Optic nerves.

---------------------------------------+----------------------------

II. τὰ κινητικὰ τω̑ν ἀμφ᾽ αὐτοὺς μυω̑ν. | III. Oculomotor nerves.

---------------------------------------+----------------------------

Not mentioned. | IV. Trochlear nerves.

---------------------------------------+----------------------------

III. τρίτη συζυγία.    }   | V. Trigeminal nerves.

IV. τετάρτη συζυγία. }   |

Mondino and Manfredi confuse |

Galen’s fourth pair and Galen’s |

sixth pair. |

---------------------------------------+----------------------------

Not mentioned by Manfredi. By | VI. Abducent nerves.

Galen probably united with II. |

---------------------------------------+----------------------------

V. πέεμπτη συζυγία.    |{ VII. Facial nerves.

|{VIII. Auditory nerves.

---------------------------------------+----------------------------

VI. ἕκτη συζυγία.   | {IX. Glossopharyngeal

| nerves.

| { X. Vagi.

| {XI. Accessory nerves of

| Willis.

---------------------------------------+----------------------------

VII. ἑβδόμη συζυγία.     | XII. Hypoglossal nerves.

---------------------------------------+----------------------------

The nomenclature of the cranial nerves adopted by Manfredi is taken

from Mondino and is almost identical with that of Galen, whose

classification is summarized above.[194] Manfredi’s description of

Galen’s fourth pair is confused and inadequate, but his account of

Galen’s sixth pair is an improvement upon Mondino.

The ‘rete mirabile’ is an interesting survival of Galenic anatomy.

This structure is hardly present in man, but is developed in the lower

animals, and especially in calves, upon whose bodies Galen worked. The

father of physiology regarded the ‘rete mirabile’ as the place where

the psychic pneuma was elaborated.[195] Galen’s findings in the lower

animals were assiduously transferred to the human body, to which his

descriptions are much less applicable, while his views on the pneuma

lasted in more or less misunderstood form well into the seventeenth

century.

(_b_) THE EYE

Studies in the History and Method of Science, vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 118 / 171 题