VI. THE STRUCTURE OF THE MATERIAL UNIVERSE

To the student of the history of science, Hildegard’s beliefs as to the

nature and structure of the universe are among the most interesting

that she has to impart. Her earlier theories are in some respects

unique among mediaeval writers, and we possess in the Wiesbaden Codex

B a diagram enabling us to interpret her views with a definiteness and

certainty that would otherwise be impossible.

Hildegard’s universe is geocentric, and consists of a spherical

earth,[52] around which are arranged a number of concentric shells or

zones. The inner zones are spherical, the outer oval, and the outermost

of all egg-shaped, with one end prolonged and more pointed than the

other (Fig. 2). The concentric structure is a commonplace of mediaeval

science, and is encountered, for instance, in the works of Bede,

Isidore, Alexander of Neckam, Roger Bacon, Albertus Magnus, and Dante.

To all these writers, however, the universe is spherical. The egg-shape

is peculiar to Hildegard. Many of the _Mappaemundi_ of the Beatus and

other types exhibit the _surface_ of the habitable earth itself as

oval, and it was from such charts that Hildegard probably gained her

conception of an oval universe. In her method of orientation also she

follows these maps, placing the east at the top of the page where we

are accustomed to place the north.[53]

It is unfortunate that she does not deal with geography in the

restricted sense, and so we are not in full possession of her views

on the antipodes, a subject of frequent derision to patristic and

of misconception to scholastic writers. She does, however, vaguely

refer to the inversion of seasons and climates in the opposite

hemisphere,[54] though she confuses the issue by the adoption of a

theory widespread in the Middle Ages and reproduced in the _Divina

Commedia_, that the antipodean surface of the earth is uninhabitable,

since it is either beneath the ocean or in the mouth of the Dragon[55]

(Plate XI, cp. Fig. 4). The nature of the antipodean inversion of

climates was clearly grasped by her contemporary, Herrade de Landsberg

(Fig. 5).

Hildegard’s views as to the internal structure of the terrestrial

sphere are also somewhat difficult to follow. Her obscure and confused

doctrine of Purgatory and Hell has puzzled other writers besides

ourselves,[56] nor need we consider it here, but she held that the

interior of the earth contained two vast spaces shaped like truncated

cones, where punishment was meted out and whence many evil things had

issue.[57] Her whole scheme presents analogies as well as contrasts

to that of her kindred spirit Dante.[58] Hildegard, however, who died

before the thirteenth century had dawned, presents us with a scheme far

less definite and elaborated than that of her great successor, who had

all the stores of the golden age of scholasticism on which to draw.

In Hildegard’s first diagram of the universe, which is of the nature

of an ‘optical section’, the world, the _sphaera elementorum_ of

Johannes Sacro Bosco and other mediaeval writers, is diagrammatically

represented as compounded of earth, air, fire, and water confusedly

mixed in what her younger contemporary, Alexander of Neckam

(1157-1217), calls ‘a certain concordant discord of the elements’. In

the illustrations to the Wiesbaden Codex B the four elements have each

a conventional method of representation, which appears again and again

in the different miniatures (Fig. 2 and Plates XII and XIII).

Around this world with its four elements is spread the atmosphere, the

_aer lucidus_ or _alba pellis_, diagrammatically represented, like

the earth which it enwraps, as circular. Through this _alba pellis_

no creature of earth can penetrate. Beyond are ranged in order four

further shells or zones. Each zone contains one of the cardinal

winds, and each cardinal wind is accompanied by two accessory winds,

represented in the traditional fashion by the breath of supernatural

beings.

Of the four outer zones the first is the _aer aquosus_, also round,

from which blows the east wind. In the outer part of the _aer aquosus_

float the clouds, and according as they contract or expand or are blown

aside, the heavenly bodies above are revealed or concealed.

Enwrapping the _aer aquosus_ is the _purus aether_, the widest of all

the zones. The long axis of this, as of the remaining outer shells,

is in the direction from east to west, thus determining the path of

movement of the heavenly bodies. Scattered through the _purus aether_

are the constellations of the fixed stars, and arranged along the long

axis are the moon and the two inner planets. From this zone blows the

west wind. The position and constitution of this _purus aether_ is

evidently the result of some misinterpretation of Aristotelian writings.

The next zone, the _umbrosa pellis_ or _ignis niger_, is a narrow dark

shell, whence proceed the more dramatic meteorological events. Here,

following on the hints of the Wisdom of Solomon (chap. v) and the Book

of Job (chap. xxxviii), are situated the diagrammatically portrayed

treasuries of lightning and of hail. From here the tempestuous north

wind bursts forth. This _ignis niger_ is clearly comparable to the _dry

earthy exhalation_ that works of the Peripatetic school regard as given

off by the outer fiery zone. The presence of the _ignis niger_ thus

suggests some contact on the part of the authoress with the teaching of

the _Meteorologica_ of Aristotle.[59]

The outermost layer of all is a mass of flames, the _lucidus ignis_.

Here are the sun and the three outer planets, and from here the south

wind pours its scorching breath (Fig. 2).

The movements of the four outer zones around each other, carrying

the heavenly bodies with them, are attributed to the winds in each

zone. The seasonal variations in the movements of the heavenly bodies,

along with the recurring seasons themselves, are also determined

by the prevalent winds, which, acting as the motive power upon the

various zones, form a celestial parallelogram of forces. In this way

is ingeniously explained also why in spring the days lengthen and in

autumn they shorten until in either case an equinox is reached (Fig. 2).

‘I looked and behold the east and the south wind with their

collaterals, moving the firmament by the power of their breath,

caused it to revolve over the earth from east to west; and in the

same way the west and north winds and their collaterals, receiving

the impulse and projecting their blast, thrust it back again from

west to east....

‘I saw also that as the days began to lengthen, the south wind and

his collaterals gradually raised the firmament in the southern

zone upwards towards the north, until the days ceased to grow

longer. Then when the days began to shorten, the north wind with

his collaterals, shrinking from the brightness of the sun, drove

the firmament back gradually southward until by reason of the

lengthening days the south wind began yet again to raise it up’[60]

(Plates VII and VIII).

Intimately bound up not only with her theory of the nature and

structure of the universe but also with her eschatological beliefs

is Hildegard’s doctrine of the elements. Before the fall of man

these were arranged in a harmony,[61] which was disturbed by that

catastrophe (Plate XII _a_),[62] so that they have since remained in

the state of mingled confusion in which we always encounter them on the

terrestrial globe. This _mistio_, to use the mediaeval Aristotelian

term, is symbolized by the irregular manner in which the elements are

represented in the central sphere of the diagram of the universe (Fig.

2). Thus mingled they will remain until subjected to the melting-pot of

the Last Judgement (Plate XIII),[63] when they will emerge in a new

and eternal harmony, no longer mixed as matter, but separate and pure,

parts of the new heaven and the new earth (Plate XII _b_).[64]

‘But the heavens and the earth, which are now,... are kept in

store and reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and

perdition of ungodly men.... But the day of the Lord will come ...

in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and

the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the

works that are therein shall be burned up.... Nevertheless we,

according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth,

wherein dwelleth righteousness’ (2 Peter iii. 7, 10, and 13).

So Hildegard, acting on a scriptural hint, is enabled to dematerialize

her doctrine of the after-things.

But although since man’s fall the elements have lost their order and

their harmony on this terrestrial orb, yet is that harmony still in

part preserved in the celestial spheres that encircle and surround

our globe; and water, air, earth, and fire have each their respective

representatives in the four concentric zones, the _aer aquosus_, the

_purus aether_, the _umbrosa pellis_, and the _lucidus ignis_ (Fig.

2). These are the ‘superior elements’ which still retain some at least

of their individuality and primal purity. From each of their spheres

blows, as we have seen, one of the cardinal winds, and each wind

partakes of the elemental character of the zone whence it issues, and

has a corresponding influence on man’s body, since each of the four

humours is specifically affected by the element to which it corresponds.

‘Then I saw that by the diverse quality of the winds, and of the

atmosphere as they in turn sweep through it, the humours in man

are agitated and altered. For in each of the superior elements

there is a breath of corresponding quality by which, through the

power of the winds, the corresponding element [below] is forced to

revolve in the atmosphere, and in no other way is it moved. And by

one of those winds, with the agency of sun, moon, and stars, the

atmosphere which tempers the world is breathed forth’[65] (Plate

VII).

This doctrine of the relation of the various winds to the four elements

and through them to the four humours is found in the _De Rerum Natura_

of Isidore of Seville, and is occasionally illustrated in European

MSS. from the ninth century onward,[66] but we meet it set forth with

special definiteness in the twelfth century in the translations from

Messahalah. It is encountered also in the work of Herrade de Landsberg.

In and after the thirteenth century it had become a commonplace.

The description we have given of the universe was in the main set

forth by Hildegard in her first work, the _Scivias_ (1141-50).[67]

Subsequently she became dissatisfied with the account she had given,

and while not withdrawing it, she sought in the _Liber Divinorum

Operum_ (1163-70) so to modify the original presentment as to bring

it more into line with accepted views. Thus she writes: ‘There

appeared to me in vision a _disk_ very like that object which I saw

twenty-eight years ago of the form of an _egg_, in the third vision

of my book _Scivias_. In the outer part of the disk there was as it

were the _lucidus ignis_, and beneath it the circle of the _ignis

niger_ was portrayed ... and these two circles were so joined as to

be one circle.’ There was thus one outer zone representing the fire.

‘Under the circle of the _ignis niger_ there was another circle in the

likeness of the _purus aether_ which was of the same width as the two

conjoined [outer] fiery circles. And below this circle again was the

circle of the _aer aquosus_ as wide as the _lucidus ignis_. And below

this circle was yet another circle, the _fortis et albus lucidusque

aer_ ... the width whereof was as the width of the _ignis niger_, and

these circles were joined to make one circle which was thus again of

width equal to the outer two. Again, under this last circle yet another

circle, the _aer tenuis_, was distinguishable, which could be seen to

raise itself as a cloud, sometimes high and light, sometimes depressed

and dark, and to diffuse itself as it were throughout the whole

disk.... The outermost fiery circle perfuses the other circles with its

fire, while the watery circle saturates them with its moisture, [cp.

Wisdom of Solomon, xix. 18-20]. And from the extreme eastern part of

the disk to the extreme west a line is stretched out [i.e. the equator]

which separates the northern zones from the others’[68] (see Fig. 3 and

Plates VII and VIII).

[Illustration: Fig. 3. HILDEGARD’S SECOND SCHEME OF THE UNIVERSE

Reconstructed from her measurements. AB, CD, and EF are all equal to

each other, as are also GH, HK, and KL. The clouds are situated in the

outer part of the _aer tenuis_, and form a prolongation downwards from

the _aer aquosus_ towards the earth.]

The earth lies concentrically with the _aer tenuis_, and its

measurements are given thus: ‘In the midst of the _aer tenuis_ a globe

was indicated, the circumference of which was everywhere equidistant

from the _fortis et albus lucidusque aer_, and it was as far across

as the depth of the space from the top of the highest circle to the

extremity of the clouds, or from the extremity of the clouds to the

circumference of the inner globe’[68] (Fig. 3).

In her earlier work, the _Scivias_, Hildegard had not apparently

realized the need of accounting for the independent movements of the

planets other than the sun and moon. She had thus placed the moon

and two of the moving stars in the _purus aether_, and the sun and

the three remaining moving stars in the _lucidus ignis_. Since these

spheres were moved by the winds, their contained planets would be

subject to the same influences. In the _Liber Divinorum Operum_,

however, she has come to realize how independent the movements of the

planets really are, and she invokes a special cause for their vagaries.

‘I looked and behold in the outer fire (_lucidus ignis_) there appeared

a circle which girt about the whole firmament from the east westward.

From it a blast produced a movement from west to east in the opposite

direction to the movement of the firmament. But this blast did not give

forth his breath earthward as did the other winds, but instead thereof

it governed the course of the planets.’[69] The source of the blast is

represented in the Lucca MS. as the head of a supernatural being with a

human face (Plate VIII).

[Illustration: From the LUCCA MS. fo. 27 v

Studies in the History and Method of Science, vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 49 / 171 题