Plate II. THE THREE SCRIPTS OF THE WIESBADEN CODEX B]

Hildegard’s journeys, undertaken with the object of stimulating

spiritual revival, were of the nature of religious progresses, but,

like those of her contemporary, Bernard of Clairvaux, they were in fact

largely directed against the heretical and most cruelly persecuted

Cathari, an Albigensian sect widely spread in the Rhine country of the

twelfth century, whom Hildegard regarded as ‘worse than the Jews’.[4]

In justice to her memory it is to be recalled that she herself was

ever against the shedding of blood, and had her less ferocious views

prevailed, some more substantial relic than the groans and tears of

this people had reached our time, while the annals of the Church had

been spared the defilement of an inexpiable stain.

[Illustration: Plate III. TITLE PAGE OF THE HEIDELBERG CODEX OF THE

_SCIVIAS_]

Hildegard’s correspondence with St. Bernard, then preaching his

crusade, with four popes, Eugenius III, Anastasius IV, Adrian IV, and

Alexander III, and with the emperors Conrad and Frederic Barbarossa,

brings her into the current of general European history, while she

comes into some slight contact with the story of our own country by her

hortatory letters to Henry II and to his consort Eleanor, the divorced

wife of Louis VII.[5]

To complete a sketch of her literary activities, mention should

perhaps be made of a secret script and language, the _lingua ignota_,

attributed to her. It is a transparent and to modern eyes a foolishly

empty device that hardly merits the dignity of the term ‘mystical’. It

has, however, exercised the ingenuity of several writers, and has been

honoured by analysis at the hands of Wilhelm Grimm.[6]

Ample material exists for a full biography of Hildegard, and a number

of accounts of her have appeared in the vulgar tongue. Nearly all are

marred by a lack of critical judgement that makes their perusal a

weary task, and indeed it would need considerable skill to interest a

detached reader in the minutiae of monastic disputes that undoubtedly

absorbed a considerable part of her activities. Perhaps the best life

of her is the earliest; it is certainly neither the least critical nor

the most credulous, and is by her contemporaries, the monks Godefrid

and Theodoric.[7]

The title of ‘saint’ is usually given to Hildegard, but she was not

in fact canonized. Attempts towards that end were made under Gregory

IX (1237), Innocent IV (1243), and John XXII (1317). Miraculous cures

and other works of wonder were claimed for her, but either they were

insufficiently miraculous or insufficiently attested.[8] Those who

have impartially traced her life in her documents will agree with the

verdict of the Church. Hers was a fiery, a prophetic, in many ways a

singularly noble spirit, but she was not a saint in any intelligible

sense of the word.

Studies in the History and Method of Science, vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 33 / 171 题