CHAPTER XI.

LOCALISED SENSITIVENESS TO GRAVITATION, AND ITS TRANSMITTED EFFECTS.

General considerations—Vicia faba, effects of amputating the tips of

the radicles—Regeneration of the tips—Effects of a short exposure of

the tips to geotropic action and their subsequent amputation—Effects of

amputating the tips obliquely—Effects of cauterising the tips—Effects

of grease on the tips—Pisum sativum, tips of radicles cauterised

transversely, and on their upper and lower sides—Phaseolus,

cauterisation and grease on the tips—Gossypium—Cucurbita, tips

cauterised transversely, and on their upper and lower sides—Zea, tips

cauterised—Concluding remarks and summary of chapter—Advantages of the

sensibility to geotropism being localised in the tips of the radicles.

Ciesielski states[1] that when the roots of Pisum, Lens and Vicia were

extended horizontally with their tips cut off, they were not acted on

by geotropism; but some days afterwards, when a new root-cap and

vegetative point had been formed, they bent themselves perpendicularly

downwards. He further states that if the tips are cut off, after the

roots have been left extended horizontally for some little time, but

before they have begun to bend downwards, they may be placed in any

position, and yet will bend as if still acted on by geotropism; and

this shows that some influence had been already transmitted to the

bending part from the tip before it was amputated. Sachs repeated these

experiments; he cut off a length of between .05 and 1 mm. (measured

from the apex of the

vegetative point) of the tips of the radicles of the bean (Vicia faba),

and placed them horizontally or vertically in damp air, earth, and

water, with the result that they became bowed in all sorts of

directions.[2] He therefore disbelieved in Ciesielski’s conclusions.

But as we have seen with several plants that the tip of the radicle is

sensitive to contact and to other irritants, and that it transmits some

influence to the upper growing part causing it to bend, there seemed to

us to be no a priori improbability in Ciesielski’s statements. We

therefore determined to repeat his experiments, and to try others on

several species by different methods.

[1] ‘Abwartskrümmung der Wurzel,’ Inaug. Dissert. Breslau, 1871, p.

29.

[2] ‘Arbeiten des Bot. Instituts in Würzburg,’ Heft. iii. 1873, p.

432.

Vicia faba.—Radicles of this plant were extended horizontally either

over water or with their lower surfaces just touching it. Their tips

had previously been cut off, in a direction as accurately transverse as

could be done, to different lengths, measured from the apex of the

root-cap, and which will be specified in each case. Light was always

excluded. We had previously tried hundreds of unmutilated radicles

under similar circumstances, and found that every one that was healthy

became plainly geotropic in under 12 h. In the case of four radicles

which had their tips cut off for a length of 1.5 mm., new root caps and

new vegetative points were re-formed after an interval of 3 days 20 h.;

and these when placed horizontally were acted on by geotropism. On some

other occasions this regeneration of the tips and reacquired

sensitiveness occurred within a somewhat shorter time. Therefore,

radicles having their tips amputated should be observed in from 12 to

48 h. after the operation.

Four radicles were extended horizontally with their lower surfaces

touching the water, and with their tips cut off for a length of only

0.5 mm.: after 23 h. three of them were still horizontal; after 47 h.

one of the three became fairly geotropic; and after 70 h. the other two

showed a trace of this action. The fourth radicle was vertically

geotropic after 23 h.; but by an

accident the root-cap alone and not the vegetative point was found to

have been amputated; so that this case formed no real exception and

might have been excluded.

Five radicles were extended horizontally like the last, and had their

tips cut off for a length of 1 mm.; after 22–23 h., four of them were

still horizontal, and one was slightly geotropic; after 48 h. the

latter had become vertical; a second was also somewhat geotropic; two

remained approximately horizontal; and the last or fifth had grown in a

disordered manner, for it was inclined upwards at an angle of 65° above

the horizon.

Fourteen radicles were extended horizontally at a little height over

the water with their tips cut off for a length of 1.5 mm.; after 12 h.

all were horizontal, whilst five control or standard specimens in the

same jar were all bent greatly downwards. After 24 h. several of the

amputated radicles remained horizontal, but some showed a trace of

geotropism, and one was plainly geotropic, for it was inclined at 40°

beneath the horizon.

Seven horizontally extended radicles from which the tips had been cut

off for the unusual length of 2 mm. unfortunately were not looked at

until 35 h. had elapsed; three were still horizontal, but to our

surprise, four were more or less plainly geotropic.

The radicles in the foregoing cases were measured before their tips

were amputated, and in the course of 24 h. they had all increased

greatly in length; but the measurements are not worth giving. It is of

more importance that Sachs found that the rate of growth of the

different parts of radicles with amputated tips was the same as with

unmutilated ones. Altogether twenty-nine radicles were operated on in

the manner above described, and of these only a few showed any

geotropic curvature within 24 h.; whereas radicles with unmutilated

tips always became, as already stated, much bent down in less than half

of this time. The part of the radicle which bends most lies at the

distance of from 3 to 6 mm. from the tip, and as the bending part

continues to grow after the operation, there does not seem any reason

why it should not have been acted on by geotropism, unless its

curvature depended on some influence transmitted from the tip. And we

have clear evidence of such transmission in Ciesielski’s experiments,

which we repeated and extended in the following manner.

Beans were embedded in friable peat with the hilum downwards, and after

their radicles had grown perpendicularly down for a length of from ½ to

1 inch, sixteen were selected which

were perfectly straight, and these were placed horizontally on the

peat, being covered by a thin layer of it. They were thus left for an

average period of 1 h. 37 m. The tips were then cut off transversely

for a length of 1.5 mm., and immediately afterwards they were embedded

vertically in the peat. In this position geotropism would not tend to

induce any curvature, but if some influence had already been

transmitted from the tip to the part which bends most, we might expect

that this part would become curved in the direction in which geotropism

had previously acted; for it should be noted that these radicles being

now destitute of their sensitive tips, would not be prevented by

geotropism from curving in any direction. The result was that of the

sixteen vertically embedded radicles, four continued for several days

to grow straight downwards, whilst twelve became more or less bowed

laterally. In two of the twelve, a trace of curvature was perceptible

in 3 h. 30 m., counting from the time when they had first been laid

horizontally; and all twelve were plainly bowed in 6 h., and still more

plainly in 9 h. In every one of them the curvature was directed towards

the side which had been downwards whilst the radicles remained

horizontal. The curvature extended for a length of from 5 to, in one

instance, 8 mm., measured from the cut-off end. Of the twelve bowed

radicles five became permanently bent into a right angle; the other

seven were at first much less bent, and their curvature generally

decreased after 24 h., but did not wholly disappear. This decrease of

curvature would naturally follow, if an exposure of only 1 h. 37 m. to

geotropism, served to modify the turgescence of the cells, but not

their subsequent growth to the full extent. The five radicles which

were rectangularly bent became fixed in this position, and they

continued to grow out horizontally in the peat for a length of about 1

inch during from 4 to 6 days. By this time new tips had been formed;

and it should be remarked that this regeneration occurred slower in the

peat than in water, owing perhaps to the radicles being often looked at

and thus disturbed. After the tips had been regenerated, geotropism was

able to act on them, so that they now became bowed vertically

downwards. An accurate drawing (Fig. 195) is given on the opposite page

of one of these five radicles, reduced to half the natural size.

We next tried whether a shorter exposure to geotropism would suffice to

produce an after-effect. Seven radicles were extended horizontally for

an hour, instead of 1 h. 37 m. as in the

former trial; and after their tips (1.5 mm. in length) had been

amputated, they were placed vertically in damp peat. Of these, three

were not in the least affected and continued for days to grow straight

downwards. Four showed after 8 h. 30 m. a mere trace of curvature in

the direction in which they had been acted on by geotropism; and in

this respect they differed much from those which had been exposed for 1

h. 37 m., for many of the latter were plainly curved in 6 h. The

curvature of one of these four radicles almost disappeared after 24 h.

In the second, the curvature increased during two days and then

decreased. the third radicle became permanently bent, so that its

terminal part made an angle of about 45° with its original vertical

direction. The fourth radicle became horizontal. These two, latter

radicles continued during two more days to grow in the peat in the same

directions, that is, at an angle of 45° beneath the horizon and

horizontally. By the fourth morning new tips had been re-formed, and

now geotropism was able to act on them again, and they became bent

perpendicularly downwards, exactly as in the case of the five radicles

described in the last paragraph and as is shown in (Fig. 195) here

given.

Fig. 195. Vicia faba: radicle, rectangularly bent at A, after the

amputation of the tip, due to the previous influence of geotropism. L,

side of bean which lay on the peat, whilst geotropism acted on the

radicle. A, point of chief curvature of the radicle, whilst standing

vertically downwards. B, point of chief curvature after the

regeneration of the tip, when geotropism again acted. C, regenerated

tip.

Lastly, five other radicles were similarly treated, but were exposed to

geotropism during only 45 m. After 8 h. 30 m. only one was doubtfully

affected; after 24 h. two were just perceptibly curved towards the side

which had been acted on by geotropism; after 48 h. the one first

mentioned had a radius of curvature of 60 mm. That this curvature was

due to the action of geotropism during the horizontal position of the

radicle, was shown after 4 days, when a new tip had been re-formed, for

it then grew perpendicularly downwards. We learn from this

case that when the tips are amputated after an exposure to geotropism

of only 45 m., though a slight influence is sometimes transmitted to

the adjoining part of the radicle, yet this seldom suffices, and then

only slowly, to induce even moderately well-pronounced curvature.

In the previously given experiments on 29 horizontally extended

radicles with their tips amputated, only one grew irregularly in any

marked manner, and this became bowed upwards at an angle of 65°. In

Ciesielski’s experiments the radicles could not have grown very

irregularly, for if they had done so, he could not have spoken

confidently of the obliteration of all geotropic action. It is

therefore remarkable that Sachs, who experimented on many radicles with

their tips amputated, found extremely disordered growth to be the usual

result. As horizontally extended radicles with amputated tips are

sometimes acted on slightly by geotropism within a short time, and are

often acted on plainly after one or two days, we thought that this

influence might possibly prevent disordered growth, though it was not

able to induce immediate curvature. Therefore 13 radicles, of which 6

had their tips amputated transversely for a length of 1.5 mm., and the

other 7 for a length of only 0.5 mm., were suspended vertically in damp

air, in which position they would not be affected by geotropism; but

they exhibited no great irregularity of growth, whilst observed during

4 to 6 days. We next thought that if care were not taken in cutting off

the tips transversely, one side of the stump might be irritated more

than the other, either at first or subsequently during the regeneration

of the tip, and that this might cause the radicle to bend to one side.

It has also been shown in Chapter III. that if a thin slice be cut off

one side of the tip of the radicle, this causes the radicle to bend

from the sliced side. Accordingly, 30 radicles, with tips amputated for

a length of 1.5 mm., were allowed to grow perpendicularly downwards

into water. Twenty of them were amputated at an angle of 20° with a

line transverse to their longitudinal axes; and such stumps appeared

only moderately oblique. The remaining ten radicles were amputated at

an angle of about 45°. Under these circumstances no less than 19 out of

the 30 became much distorted in the course of 2 or 3 days. Eleven other

radicles were similarly treated, excepting that only 1 mm. (including

in this and all other cases the root-cap) was amputated; and of these

only one grew much, and two others slightly

distorted; so that this amount of oblique amputation was not

sufficient. Out of the above 30 radicles, only one or two showed in the

first 24 h. any distortion, but this became plain in the 19 cases on

the second day, and still more conspicuous at the close of the third

day, by which time new tips had been partially or completely

regenerated. When therefore a new tip is reformed on an oblique stump,

it probably is developed sooner on one side than on the other: and this

in some manner excites the adjoining part to bend to one side. Hence it

seems probable that Sachs unintentionally amputated the radicles on

which he experimented, not strictly in a transverse direction.

This explanation of the occasional irregular growth of radicles with

amputated tips, is supported by the results of cauterising their tips;

for often a greater length on one side than on the other was

unavoidably injured or killed. It should be remarked that in the

following trials the tips were first dried with blotting-paper, and

then slightly rubbed with a dry stick of nitrate of silver or lunar

caustic. A few touches with the caustic suffice to kill the root-cap

and some of the upper layers of cells of the vegetative point.

Twenty-seven radicles, some young and very short, others of moderate

length, were suspended vertically over water, after being thus

cauterised. Of these some entered the water immediately, and others on

the second day. The same number of uncauterised radicles of the same

age were observed as controls. After an interval of three or four days

the contrast in appearance between the cauterised and control specimens

was wonderfully great. The controls had grown straight downwards, with

the exception of the normal curvature, which we have called Sachs’

curvature. Of the 27 cauterised radicles, 15 had become extremely

distorted; 6 of them grew upwards and formed hoops, so that their tips

sometimes came into contact with the bean above; 5 grew out

rectangularly to one side; only a few of the remaining 12 were quite

straight, and some of these towards the close of our observations

became hooked at their extreme lower ends. Radicles, extended

horizontally instead of vertically, with their tips cauterised, also

sometimes grew distorted, but not so commonly, as far as we could

judge, as those suspended vertically; for this occurred with only 5 out

of 19 radicles thus treated.

Instead of cutting off the tips, as in the first set of experiments, we

next tried the effects of touching horizontally extended radicles with

caustic in the manner just described. But

some preliminary remarks must first be made. It may be objected that

the caustic would injure the radicles and prevent them from bending;

but ample evidence was given in Chapter III. that touching the tips of

vertically suspended radicles with caustic on one side, does not stop

their bending; on the contrary, it causes them to bend from the touched

side. We also tried touching both the upper and the lower sides of the

tips of some radicles of the bean, extended horizontally in damp

friable earth. The tips of three were touched with caustic on their

upper sides, and this would aid their geotropic bending; the tips of

three were touched on their lower sides, which would tend to counteract

the bending downwards; and three were left as controls. After 24 h. an

independent observer was asked to pick out of the nine radicles, the

two which were most and the two which were least bent; he selected as

the latter, two of those which had been touched on their lower sides,

and as the most bent, two of those which had been touched on the upper

side. Hereafter analogous and more striking experiments with Pisum

sativum and Cucurbita ovifera will be given. We may therefore safely

conclude that the mere application of caustic to the tip does not

prevent the radicles from bending.

In the following experiments, the tips of young horizontally extended

radicles were just touched with a stick of dry caustic; and this was

held transversely, so that the tip might be cauterised all round as

symmetrically as possible. The radicles were then suspended in a closed

vessel over water, kept rather cool, viz., 55°–59° F. This was done

because we had found that the tips were more sensitive to contact under

a low than under a high temperature; and we thought that the same rule

might apply to geotropism. In one exceptional trial, nine radicles

(which were rather too old, for they had grown to a length of from 3 to

5 cm.), were extended horizontally in damp friable earth, after their

tips had been cauterised and were kept at too high a temperature, viz.,

of 68° F., or 20° C. The result in consequence was not so striking as

in the subsequent cases for although when after 9 h. 40 m. six of them

were examined, these did not exhibit any geotropic bending, yet after

24 h., when all nine were examined, only two remained horizontal, two

exhibited a trace of geotropism, and five were slightly or moderately

geotropic, yet not comparable in degree with the control specimens.

Marks had been made on seven of these cauterised radicles at 10 mm.

from the tips, which includes

the whole growing portion; and after the 24 h. this part had a mean

length of 37 mm., so that it had increased to more than 3½ times its

original length; but it should be remembered that these beans had been

exposed to a rather high temperature.

Nineteen young radicles with cauterised tips were extended at different

times horizontally over water. In every trial an equal number of

control specimens were observed. In the first trial, the tips of three

radicles were lightly touched with the caustic for 6 or 7 seconds,

which was a longer application than usual. After 23 h. 30 m. (temp.

55°–56° F.) these three radicles, A, B, C (Fig. 196), were still

horizontal, whilst the three control specimens had become within 8 h.

slightly geotropic, and strongly so (D, E, F) in 23 h. 30 m. A dot had

been made on all six radicles at 10 mm. from their tips, when first

placed horizontally. After the 23 h. 30 m. this terminal part,

originally 10 mm. in length, had increased in the cauterised specimens

to a mean length of 17.3 mm., and to 15.7 mm. in the control radicles,

as shown in the figures by the unbroken transverse line; the dotted

line being at 10 mm. from the apex. The control or uncauterised

radicles, therefore, had actually grown less

than the cauterised; but this no doubt was accidental, for radicles of

different ages grow at different rates, and the growth of different

individuals is likewise affected by unknown causes. The state of the

tips of these three radicles, which had been cauterised for a rather

longer time than usual, was as follows: the blackened apex, or the part

which had been actually touched by the caustic, was succeeded by a

yellowish zone, due probably to the absorption of some of the caustic;

in A, both zones together were 1.1 mm. in length, and 1.4 mm. in

diameter at the base of the yellowish zone; in B, the length of both

was only 0.7 mm., and the diameter 0.7 mm.; in C, the length was 0.8

mm., and the diameter 1.2 mm.

Fig. 196. Vicia faba: state of radicles which had been extended

horizontally for 23 h. 30 m.; A, B, C, tips touched with caustic; D, E,

F, tips uncauterised. Lengths of radicles reduced to one-half scale,

but by an accident the beans themselves not reduced in the same degree.

Three other radicles, the tips of which had been touched with caustic

curing 2 or 3 seconds, remained (temp. 58°–59° F.) horizontal for 23

h.; the control radicles having, of course, become geotropic within

this time. The terminal growing part, 10 mm. in length, of the

cauterised radicles had increased in this interval to a mean length of

24.5 mm., and of the controls to a mean of 26 mm. A section of one of

the cauterised tips showed that the blackened part was 0.5 mm. in

length, of which 0.2 mm. extended into the vegetative point; and a

faint discoloration could be detected even to 1.6 mm. from the apex of

the root-cap.

In another lot of six radicles (temp. 55°–57° F.) the three control

specimens were plainly geotropic in 8½ h.; and after 24 h. the mean

length of their terminal part had increased from 10 mm. to 21 mm. When

the caustic was applied to the three cauterised specimens, it was held

quite motionless during 5 seconds, and the result was that the black

marks were extremely minute. Therefore, caustic was again applied,

after 8½ h., during which time no geotropic action had occurred. When

the specimens were re-examined after an additional interval of 15½ h.,

one was horizontal and the other two showed, to our surprise, a trace

of geotropism which in one of them soon afterwards became strongly

marked; but in this latter specimen the discoloured tip was only 2/3

mm. in length. The growing part of these three radicles increased in 24

h. from 10 mm. to an average of 16.5 mm.

It would be superfluous to describe in detail the behaviour of the 10

remaining cauterised radicles. The corresponding control specimens all

became geotropic in 8 h. Of the cauterised, 6 were first looked at

after 8 h., and one alone showed a trace

of geotropism; 4 were first looked at after 14 h., and one alone of

these was slightly geotropic. After 23–24h., 5 of the 10 were still

horizontal, 4 slightly, and 1 decidedly, geotropic. After 48 h. some of

them became strongly geotropic. The cauterised radicles increased

greatly in length, but the measurements are not worth giving.

As five of the last-mentioned cauterised radicles had become in 24 h.

somewhat geotropic, these (together with three which were still

horizontal) had their positions reversed, so that their tips were now a

little upturned, and they were again touched with caustic. After 24 h.

they showed no trace of geotropism; whereas the eight corresponding

control specimens, which had likewise been reversed, in which position

the tips of several pointed to the zenith, all became geotropic; some

having passed in the 24 h. through an angle of 180°, others through

about 135°, and others through only 90°. The eight radicles, which had

been twice cauterised, were observed for an additional day (i.e. for 48

h. after being reversed), and they still showed no signs of geotropism.

Nevertheless, they continued to grow rapidly; four were measured 24 h.

after being reversed, and they had in this time increased in length

between 8 and 11 mm.; the other four were measured 48 h. after being

reversed, and these had increased by 20, 18, 23, and 28 mm.

In coming to a conclusion with respect to the effects of cauterising

the tips of these radicles, we should bear in mind, firstly, that

horizontally extended control radicles were always acted on by

geotropism, and became somewhat bowed downwards in 8 or 9 h.; secondly,

that the chief seat of the curvature lies at a distance of from 3 to 6

mm. from the tip; thirdly, that the tip was discoloured by the caustic

rarely for more than 1 mm. in length; fourthly, that the greater number

of the cauterised radicles, although subjected to the full influence of

geotropism during the whole time, remained horizontal for 24 h., and

some for twice as long; and that those which did become bowed were so

only in a slight degree; fifthly, that the cauterised radicles

continued to grow almost, and sometimes quite, as well as the uninjured

ones along the part which bends most. And lastly, that a touch on the

tip with caustic, if on one side, far from preventing curvature,

actually induces it. Bearing all these facts in mind, we must infer

that under normal conditions the geotropic curvature of the root is due

to an influence transmitted from the apex to the adjoining part where

the bending

takes place; and that when the tip of the root is cauterised it is

unable to originate the stimulus necessary to produce geotropic

curvature.

As we had observed that grease was highly injurious to some plants, we

determined to try its effects on radicles. When the cotyledons of

Phalaris and Avena were covered with grease along one side, the growth

of this side was quite stopped or greatly checked, and as the opposite

side continued to grow, the cotyledons thus treated became bowed

towards the greased side. This same matter quickly killed the delicate

hypocotyls and young leaves of certain plants. The grease which we

employed was made by mixing lamp-black and olive oil to such a

consistence that it could be laid on in a thick layer. The tips of five

radicles of the bean were coated with it for a length of 3 mm., and to

our surprise this part increased in length in 23 h. to 7.1 mm.; the

thick layer of grease being curiously drawn out. It thus could not have

checked much, if at all, the growth of the terminal part of the

radicle. With respect to geotropism, the tips of seven horizontally

extended radicles were coated for a length of 2 mm., and after 24 h. no

clear difference could be perceived between their downward curvature

and that of an equal number of control specimens. The tips of 33 other

radicles were coated on different occasions for a length of 3 mm.; and

they were compared with the controls after 8 h., 24 h., and 48 h. On

one occasion, after 24 h., there was very little difference in

curvature between the greased and control specimens; but generally the

difference was unmistakable, those with greased tips being considerably

less curved downwards. The whole growing part (the greased tips

included) of six of these radicles was measured and was found to have

increased in 23 h. from 10 mm. to a mean length of 17.7 mm.; whilst the

corresponding part of the controls had increased to 20.8 mm. It appears

therefore, that although the tip itself, when greased, continues to

grow, yet the growth of the whole radicle is somewhat checked, and that

the geotropic curvature of the upper part, which was free from grease,

was in most cases considerably lessened.

Pisum sativum.—Five radicles, extended horizontally over water, had

their tips lightly touched two or three times with dry caustic. These

tips were measured in two cases, and found to be blackened for a length

of only half a millimeter. Five other radicles were left as controls.

The part which is most bowed through geotropism lies at a distance of

several millimeters from

the apex. After 24 h., and again after 32 h. from the commencement,

four of the cauterised radicles were still horizontal, but one was

plainly geotropic, being inclined at 45° beneath the horizon. The five

controls were somewhat geotropic after 7 h. 20 m., and after 24 h. were

all strongly geotropic; being inclined at the following angles beneath

the horizon, viz., 59°, 60°, 65°, 57°, and 43°. The length of the

radicles was not measured in either set, but it was manifest that the

cauterised radicles had grown greatly.

The following case proves that the action of the caustic by itself does

not prevent the curvature of the radicle. Ten radicles were extended

horizontally on and beneath a layer of damp friable peat-earth; and

before being extended their tips were touched with dry caustic on the

upper side. Ten other radicles similarly placed were touched on the

lower side; and this would tend to make them bend from the cauterised

side; and therefore, as now placed, upwards, or in opposition to

geotropism. Lastly, ten uncauterised radicles were extended

horizontally as controls. After 24 h. all the latter were geotropic;

and the ten with their tips cauterised on the upper side were equally

geotropic; and we believe that they became curved downwards before the

controls. The ten which had been cauterised on the lower side presented

a widely different appearance: No. 1, however, was perpendicularly

geotropic, but this was no real exception, for on examination under the

microscope, there was no vestige of a coloured mark on the tip, and it

was evident that by a mistake it had not been touched with the caustic.

No. 2 was plainly geotropic, being inclined at about 45° beneath the

horizon; No. 3 was slightly, and No. 4 only just perceptibly geotropic;

Nos. 5 and 6 were strictly horizontal; and the four remaining ones were

bowed upwards, in opposition to geotropism. In these four cases the

radius of the upward curvatures (according to Sachs’ cyclometer) was 5

mm., 10 mm., 30 mm., and 70 mm. This curvature was distinct long before

the 24 h. had elapsed, namely, after 8 h. 45 m. from the time when the

lower sides of the tips were touched with the caustic.

Phaseolus multiflorus.—Eight radicles, serving as controls, were

extended horizontally, some in damp friable peat and some in damp air.

They all became (temp 20°–21° C.) plainly geotropic in 8 h. 30 m., for

they then stood at an average angle of 63° beneath the horizon. A

rather greater length of the radicle is bowed downwards by geotropism

than in the case of Vicia faba,

that is to say, rather more than 6 mm. as measured from the apex of the

root-cap. Nine other radicles were similarly extended, three in damp

peat and six in damp air, and dry caustic was held transversely to

their tips during 4 or 5 seconds. Three of their tips were afterwards

examined: in (1) a length of 0.68 mm. was discoloured, of which the

basal 0.136 mm. was yellow, the apical part being black; in (2) the

discoloration was 0.65 mm. in length, of which the basal 0.04 mm. was

yellow; in (3) the discoloration was 0.6 mm. in length, of which the

basal 0.13 mm. was yellow. Therefore less than 1 mm. was affected by

the caustic, but this sufficed almost wholly to prevent geotropic

action; for after 24 h. one alone of the nine cauterised radicles

became slightly geotropic, being now inclined at 10° beneath the

horizon; the eight others remained horizontal, though one was curved a

little laterally.

The terminal part (10 mm. in length) of the six cauterised radicles in

the damp air, had more than doubled in length in the 24 h., for this

part was now on an average 20.7 mm. long. The increase in length within

the same time was greater in the control specimens, for the terminal

part had grown on an average from 10 mm. to 26.6 mm. But as the

cauterised radicles had more than doubled their length in the 24 h., it

is manifest that they had not been seriously injured by the caustic. We

may here add that when experimenting on the effects of touching one

side of the tip with caustic, too much was applied at first, and the

whole tip (but we believe not more than 1 mm. in length) of six

horizontally extended radicles was killed, and these continued for two

or three days to grow out horizontally.

Many trials were made, by coating the tips of horizontally extended

radicles with the before described thick grease. The geotropic

curvature of 12 radicles, which were thus coated for a length of 2 mm.,

was delayed during the first 8 or 9 h., but after 24 h. was nearly as

great as that of the control specimens. The tips of nine radicles were

coated for a length of 3 mm., and after 7 h. 10 m. these stood at an

average angle of 30° beneath the horizon, whilst the controls stood at

an average of 54°. After 24 h. the two lots differed but little in

their degree of curvature. In some other trials, however, there was a

fairly well-marked difference after 24 h. between those with greased

tips and the controls. The terminal part of eight control specimens

increased in 24 h. from 10 mm. to a mean length of

24.3 mm., whilst the mean increase of those with greased tips was 20.7

mm. The grease, therefore, slightly checked the growth of the terminal

part, but this part was not much injured; for several radicles which

had been greased for a length of 2 mm. continued to grow during seven

days, and were then only a little shorter than the controls. The

appearance presented by these radicles after the seven days was very

curious, for the black grease had been drawn out into the finest

longitudinal striae, with dots and reticulations, which covered their

surfaces for a length of from 26 to 44 mm., or of 1 to 1.7 inch. We may

therefore conclude that grease on the tips of the radicles of this

Phaseolus somewhat delays and lessens the geotropic curvature of the

part which ought to bend most.

Gossypium herbaceum.—The radicles of this plant bend, through the

action of geotropism, for a length of about 6 mm. Five radicles, placed

horizontally in damp air, had their tips touched with caustic, and the

discoloration extended for a length of from 2/3 to 1 mm. They showed,

after 7 h. 45 m. and again after 23 h., not a trace of geotropism; yet

the terminal portion, 9 mm. in length, had increased on an average to

15.9 mm. Six control radicles, after 7 h. 45 m., were all plainly

geotropic, two of them being vertically dependent, and after 23 h. all

were vertical, or nearly so.

Cucurbita ovifera.—A large number of trials proved almost useless, from

the three following causes: Firstly, the tips of radicles which have

grown somewhat old are only feebly geotropic if kept in damp air; nor

did we succeed well in our experiments, until the germinating seeds

were placed in peat and kept at a rather high temperature. Secondly,

the hypocotyls of the seeds which were pinned to the lids of the jars

gradually became arched; and, as the cotyledons were fixed, the

movement of the hypocotyl affected the position of the radicle, and

caused confusion. Thirdly, the point of the radicle is so fine that it

is difficult not to cauterise it either too much or too little. But we

managed generally to overcome this latter difficulty, as the following

experiments show, which are given to prove that a touch with caustic on

one side of the tip does not prevent the upper part of the radicle from

bending. Ten radicles were laid horizontally beneath and on damp

friable peat, and their tips were touched with caustic on the upper

side. After 8 h. all were plainly geotropic, three of them

rectangularly; after 19 h.

all were strongly geotropic, most of them pointing perpendicularly

downwards. Ten other radicles, similarly placed, had their tips touched

with caustic on the lower side; after 8 h. three were slightly

geotropic, but not nearly so much so as the least geotropic of the

foregoing specimens; four remained horizontal; and three were curved

upwards in opposition to geotropism. After 19 h. the three which were

slightly geotropic had become strongly so. Of the four horizontal

radicles, one alone showed a trace of geotropism; of the three

up-curved radicles, one retained this curvature, and the other two had

become horizontal.

The radicles of this plant, as already remarked, do not succeed well in

damp air, but the result of one trial may be briefly given. Nine young

radicles between .3 and .5 inch in length, with their tips cauterised

and blackened for a length never exceeding ½ mm., together with eight

control specimens, were extended horizontally in damp air. After an

interval of only 4 h. 10 m. all the controls were slightly geotropic,

whilst not one of the cauterised specimens exhibited a trace of this

action. After 8 h. 35 m., there was the same difference between the two

sets, but rather more strongly marked. By this time both sets had

increased greatly in length. The controls, however, never became much

more curved downwards; and after 24 h. there was no great difference

between the two sets in their degree of curvature.

Eight young radicles of nearly equal length (average .36 inch) were

placed beneath and on peat-earth, and were exposed to a temp. of

75°–76° F. Their tips had been touched transversely with caustic, and

five of them were blackened for a length of about 0.5 mm., whilst the

other three were only just visibly discoloured. In the same box there

were 15 control radicles, mostly about .36 inch in length, but some

rather longer and older, and therefore less sensitive. After 5 h., the

15 control radicles were all more or less geotropic: after 9 h., eight

of them were bent down beneath the horizon at various angles between

45° and 90°, the remaining seven being only slightly geotropic: after

25 h. all were rectangularly geotropic. The state of the eight

cauterised radicles after the same intervals of time was as follows:

after 5 h. one alone was slightly geotropic, and this was one with the

tip only a very little discoloured: after 9 h. the one just mentioned

was rectangularly geotropic, and two others were slightly so, and these

were the three which had been scarcely

affected by the caustic; the other five were still strictly horizontal.

After 24 h. 40 m. the three with only slightly discoloured tips were

bent down rectangularly; the other five were not in the least affected,

but several of them had grown rather tortuously, though still in a

horizontal plane. The eight cauterised radicles which had at first a

mean length of .36 inch, after 9 h. had increased to a mean length of

.79 inch; and after 24 h. 40 m. to the extraordinary mean length of 2

inches. There was no plain difference in length between the five well

cauterised radicles which remained horizontal, and the three with

slightly cauterised tips which had become abruptly bent down. A few of

the control radicles were measured after 25 h., and they were on an

average only a little longer than the cauterised, viz., 2.19 inches. We

thus see that killing the extreme tip of the radicle of this plant for

a length of about 0.5 mm., though it stops the geotropic bending of the

upper part, hardly interferes with the growth of the whole radicle.

In the same box with the 15 control specimens, the rapid geotropic

bending and growth of which have just been described, there were six

radicles, about .6 inch in length, extended horizontally, from which

the tips had been cut off in a transverse direction for a length of

barely 1 mm. These radicles were examined after 9 h. and again after 24

h. 40 m., and they all remained horizontal. They had not become nearly

so tortuous as those above described which had been cauterised. The

radicles with their tips cut off had grown in the 24 h. 40 m. as much,

judging by the eye, as the cauterised specimens.

Zea mays.—The tips of several radicles, extended horizontally in damp

air, were dried with blotting-paper and then touched in the first trial

during 2 or 3 seconds with dry caustic; but this was too long a

contact, for the tips were blackened for a length of rather above 1 mm.

They showed no signs of geotropism after an interval of 9 h., and were

then thrown away. In a second trial the tips of three radicles were

touched for a shorter time, and were blackened for a length of from 0.5

to 0.75 mm.: they all remained horizontal for 4 h., but after 8 h. 30

m. one of them, in which the blackened tip was only 0.5 mm. in length,

was inclined at 21° beneath the horizon. Six control radicles all

became slightly geotropic in 4 h., and strongly so after 8 h. 30 m.,

with the chief seat of curvature generally between 6 or 7 mm. from the

apex. In the cauterised specimens, the terminal growing part, 10 mm. in

length, increased during

the 8 h. 30 m. to a mean length of 13 mm.; and in the controls to 14.3

mm.

In a third trial the tips of five radicles (exposed to a temp. of

70°–71°) were touched with the caustic only once and very slightly;

they were afterwards examined under the microscope, and the part which

was in any way discoloured was on an average .76 mm. in length. After 4

h. 10 m. none were bent; after 5 h. 45 m., and again after 23 h. 30 m.,

they still remained horizontal, excepting one which was now inclined

20° beneath the horizon. The terminal part, 10 mm. in length, had

increased greatly in length during the 23 h. 30 m., viz., to an average

of 26 mm. Four control radicles became slightly geotropic after the 4

h. 10 m., and plainly so after the 5 h. 45 m. Their mean length after

the 23 h. 30 m. had increased from 10 mm. to 31 mm. Therefore a slight

cauterisation of the tip checks slightly the growth of the whole

radicle, and manifestly stops the bending of that part which ought to

bend most under the influence of geotropism, and which still continues

to increase greatly in length.]

Concluding Remarks.—Abundant evidence has now been given, showing that

with various plants the tip of the radicle is alone sensitive to

geotropism; and that when thus excited, it causes the adjoining parts

to bend. The exact length of the sensitive part seems to be somewhat

variable, depending in part on the age of the radicle; but the

destruction of a length of from less than 1 to 1.5 mm. (about 1/20th of

an inch), in the several species observed, generally sufficed to

prevent any part of the radicle from bending within 24 h., or even for

a longer period. The fact of the tip alone being sensitive is so

remarkable a fact, that we will here give a brief summary of the

foregoing experiments. The tips were cut off 29 horizontally extended

radicles of Vicia faba, and with a few exceptions they did not become

geotropic in 22 or 23 h., whilst unmutilated radicles were always bowed

downwards in 8 or 9 h. It should be borne in mind that the mere act of

cutting

off the tip of a horizontally extended radicle does not prevent the

adjoining parts from bending, if the tip has been previously exposed

for an hour or two to the influence of geotropism. The tip after

amputation is sometimes completely regenerated in three days; and it is

possible that it may be able to transmit an impulse to the adjoining

parts before its complete regeneration. The tips of six radicles of

Cucurbita ovifera were amputated like those of Vicia faba; and these

radicles showed no signs of geotropism in 24 h.; whereas the control

specimens were slightly affected in 5 h., and strongly in 9 h.

With plants belonging to six genera, the tips of the radicles were

touched transversely with dry caustic; and the injury thus caused

rarely extended for a greater length than 1 mm., and sometimes to a

less distance, as judged by even the faintest discoloration. We thought

that this would be a better method of destroying the vegetative point

than cutting it off; for we knew, from many previous experiments and

from some given in the present chapter, that a touch with caustic on

one side of the apex, far from preventing the adjoining part from

bending, caused it to bend. In all the following cases, radicles with

uncauterised tips were observed at the same time and under similar

circumstances, and they became, in almost every instance, plainly bowed

downwards in one-half or one-third of the time during which the

cauterised specimens were observed. With Vicia faba 19 radicles were

cauterised; 12 remained horizontal during 23–24 h.; 6 became slightly

and 1 strongly geotropic. Eight of these radicles were afterwards

reversed, and again touched with caustic, and none of them became

geotropic in 24 h., whilst the reversed control specimens became

strongly bowed downwards within this time.

With Pisum sativum, five radicles had their tips touched with caustic,

and after 32 h. four were still horizontal. The control specimens were

slightly geotropic in 7 h. 20 m., and strongly so in 24 h. The tips of

9 other radicles of this plant were touched only on the lower side, and

6 of them remained horizontal for 24 h., or were upturned in opposition

to geotropism; 2 were slightly, and 1 plainly geotropic. With Phaseolus

multiflorus, 15 radicles were cauterised, and 8 remained horizontal for

24 h.; whereas all the controls were plainly geotropic in 8 h. 30 m. Of

5 cauterised radicles of Gossypium herbaceum, 4 remained horizontal for

23 h. and 1 became slightly geotropic; 6 control radicles were

distinctly geotropic in 7 h. 45 m. Five radicles of Cucurbita ovifera

remained horizontal in peat-earth during 25 h., and 9 remained so in

damp air during 8½ h.; whilst the controls became slightly geotropic in

4 h. 10 m. The tips of 10 radicals of this plant were touched on their

lower sides, and 6 of them remained horizontal or were upturned after

19 h., 1 being slightly and 3 strongly geotropic.

Lastly, the tips of several radicles of Vicia faba and Phaseolus

multiflorus were thickly coated with grease for a length of 3 mm. This

matter, which is highly injurious to most plants, did not kill or stop

the growth of the tips, and only slightly lessened the rate of growth

of the whole radicle; but it generally delayed a little the geotropic

bending of the upper part.

The several foregoing cases would tell us nothing, if the tip itself

was the part which became most bent; but we know that it is a part

distant from the tip by some millimeters which grows quickest, and

which, under the influence of geotropism, bends most. We have no reason

to suppose that this part is injured by the death or injury of the tip;

and it is certain

that after the tip has been destroyed this part goes on growing at such

a rate, that its length was often doubled in a day. We have also seen

that the destruction of the tip does not prevent the adjoining part

from bending, if this part has already received some influence from the

tip. As with horizontally extended radicles, of which the tip has been

cut off or destroyed, the part which ought to bend most remains

motionless for many hours or days, although exposed at right angles to

the full influence of geotropism, we must conclude that the tip alone

is sensitive to this power, and transmits some influence or stimulus to

the adjoining parts, causing them to bend. We have direct evidence of

such transmission; for when a radicle was left extended horizontally

for an hour or an hour and a half, by which time the supposed influence

will have travelled a little distance from the tip, and the tip was

then cut off, the radicle afterwards became bent, although placed

perpendicularly. The terminal portions of several radicles thus treated

continued for some time to grow in the direction of their

newly-acquired curvature; for as they were destitute of tips, they were

no longer acted on by geotropism. But after three or four days when new

vegetative points were formed, the radicles were again acted on by

geotropism, and now they curved themselves perpendicularly downwards.

To see anything of the above kind in the animal kingdom, we should have

to suppose than an animal whilst lying down determined to rise up in

some particular direction; and that after its head had been cut off, an

impulse continued to travel very slowly along the nerves to the proper

muscles; so that after several hours the headless animal rose up in the

predetermined direction.

As the tip of the radicle has been found to be the

part which is sensitive to geotropism in the members of such distinct

families as the Leguminosae, Malvaceae, Cucurbitaceæ and Gramineæ, we

may infer that this character is common to the roots of most seedling

plants. Whilst a root is penetrating the ground, the tip must travel

first; and we can see the advantage of its being sensitive to

geotropism, as it has to determine the course of the whole root.

Whenever the tip is deflected by any subterranean obstacle, it will

also be an advantage that a considerable length of the root should be

able to bend, more especially as the tip itself grows slowly and bends

but little, so that the proper downward course may be soon recovered.

But it appears at first sight immaterial whether this were effected by

the whole growing part being sensitive to geotropism, or by an

influence transmitted exclusively from the tip. We should, however,

remember that it is the tip which is sensitive to the contact of hard

objects, causing the radicle to bend away from them, thus guiding it

along the lines of least resistance in the soil. It is again the tip

which is alone sensitive, at least in some cases, to moisture, causing

the radicle to bend towards its source. These two kinds of

sensitiveness conquer for a time the sensitiveness to geotropism,

which, however, ultimately prevails. Therefore, the three kinds of

sensitiveness must often come into antagonism; first one prevailing,

and then another; and it would be an advantage, perhaps a necessity,

for the interweighing and reconciling of these three kinds of

sensitiveness, that they should be all localised in the same group of

cells which have to transmit the command to the adjoining parts of the

radicle, causing it to bend to or from the source of irritation.

Finally, the fact of the tip alone being sensitive to

the attraction of gravity has an important bearing on the theory of

geotropism. Authors seem generally to look at the bending of a radicle

towards the centre of the earth, as the direct result of gravitation,

which is believed to modify the growth of the upper or lower surfaces,

in such a manner as to induce curvature in the proper direction. But we

now know that it is the tip alone which is acted on, and that this part

transmits some influence to the adjoining parts, causing them to curve

downwards. Gravity does not appear to act in a more direct manner on a

radicle, than it does on any lowly organised animal, which moves away

when it feels some weight or pressure.

The Power of Movement in Plants · 第 13 / 14 章