THE LIAS

is an English provincial name given to an argillaceous limestone, which,

with marl and clay, forms the base of the Jurassic formation, and passes

almost imperceptibly into the Lower Oolite in some places, where the

Marlstone of the Lias partakes of the mineral character, as well as the

fossil remains of the Lower Oolite; and it is sometimes treated of as

belonging to that formation. “Nevertheless, the Lias may be traced

throughout a great part of Europe as a separate and independent group,

of considerable thickness, varying from 500 to 1,000 feet, containing

many peculiar fossils, and having a very uniform lithological

aspect.”[61] The rocks which represent the Liassic period form the base

of the Jurassic system, and have a mean thickness of about 1,200 feet.

In the inferior part we find argillaceous sandstones, which are called

the sandstones of the Lias, and comprehend the greater part of the

_Quadersandstein_, or building-stone of the Germans, above which comes

compact limestone, argillaceous, bluish, and yellowish; finally, the

formation terminates in the marlstones which are sometimes sandy, and

occasionally bituminous.

[61] Lyell, “Elements of Geology,” p. 413.

The Lias, in England, is generally in three groups: 1, the upper, clays

and shales, underlying sands; 2, the middle, lias or marlstone; and 3,

the lower, clays and limestone; but these have been again

sub-divided--the last into six zones, each marked by its own peculiar

species of Ammonites; the second into three zones; the third consists of

clay, shale, and argillaceous limestone. For the purposes of description

we shall, therefore, divide the Lias into these three groups:--

1. _Upper Lias Clay_, consists of blue clay, or shale, containing

nodular bands of claystones at the base, crowded with _Ammonites

serpentinus_, _A. bifrons_, _Belemnites_, &c.

2. The _Middle Lias_, commonly known as the Marlstone, is surmounted by

a bed of oolitic ironstone, largely worked in Leicestershire and in the

north of England as a valuable ore of iron. The underlying marls and

sands, the latter of which become somewhat argillaceous below, form beds

from 200 to 300 feet thick in Dorsetshire and Gloucestershire; the

fossils are _Ammonites margaritaceus_, _A. spinatus_, _Belemnites

tripartitus_. The upper rock-beds, especially the bed of ironstone on

the top, is generally remarkably rich in fossils.

[Illustration: Fig. 88.--Gryphæa incurva.]

3. _Lower Lias_ (averaging from 600 to 900 feet in thickness) consists,

in the lower part, of thin layers of bluish argillaceous limestone,

alternating with shales and clays; the whole overlaid by the blue clay

of which the lower member of the Liassic group usually consists. This

member of the series is well developed in Yorkshire, at Lyme Regis and

Charmouth in Dorsetshire, and generally over the South-West and Midland

Counties of England. _Gryphæa incurva_ (Fig. 88), with sandy bands,

occurs at the base, in addition to which we find _Ammonites planorbis

Bucklandi_, _A. Ostrea liassica_, _Lima gigantea_, _Ammonites

Bucklandi_, &c., in the lower limestones and shales.

Above the clay are yellow sands from 100 to 200 feet thick, underlying

the limestone of the Inferior Oolite. These sands were, until lately,

considered to belong to the latter formation--as they undoubtedly do

physically--until they were shown, by Dr. Thomas Wright, of Cheltenham,

to be more nearly allied, by their fossils, to the Lias below than to

the Inferior Oolite above, into which they form the passage-beds.

In France the Lias abounds in the Calvados, in Burgundy, Lorraine,

Normandy, and the Lyonnais. In the Vosges and Luxembourg, M. Elie de

Beaumont states that the Lias containing _Gryphæa incurva_ and _Lima

gigantea_, and some other marine fossils, becomes arenaceous; and around

the Harz mountains, in Westphalia and Bavaria, in its lower parts the

formation is sandy, and is sometimes a good building-stone.

“In England the Lias constitutes,” says Professor Ramsay, “a

well-defined belt of strata, running continuously from Lyme Regis, on

the south-west, through the whole of England, to Yorkshire on the

north-east, and is an extensive series of alternating beds of clay,

shale, and limestone, with occasional layers of jet in the upper part.

The unequal hardness of the clays and limestones of the Liassic strata

causes some of its members to stand out in the distinct minor

escarpments, often facing the west and north-west. The Marlstone forms

the most prominent of these, and overlooks the broad meadows of the

lower Lias-clay, that form much of the centre of England.” In Scotland

there are few traces of the Lias. Zoophytes, Mollusca, and Fishes of a

peculiar organisation, but, above all, Reptiles of extraordinary size

and structure gave to the sea of the Liassic period an interest and

features quite peculiar. Well might Cuvier exclaim, when the drawings of

the Plesiosaurus were sent to him: “Truly this is altogether the most

monstrous animal that has yet been dug out of the ruins of a former

world!” In the whole of the English Lias there are about 243 genera, and

467 species of fossils. The whole series has been divided into zones

characterised by particular Ammonites, which are found to be limited to

them, at least locally.

Among the Echinodermata belonging to the Lias we may cite _Asterias

lumbricalis_ and _Palæocoma Furstembergii_, which constitutes a genus

not dissimilar to the star-fishes, of which its radiated form reminds

us. The Pentacrinites, of which _Pentacrinites Briareus_ is a type,

ornaments many collections by its elegant form, and is represented in

Figs. 79 and 89. It belongs to the order of Crinoidea, which is

represented at the present time by a single living species, _Pentacrinus

caput-Medusæ_, one of the rare and delicate Zoophytes of the Caribbean

sea.

Oysters (_Ostrea_) made their appearance in the Muschelkalk of the last

period, but only in a small number of species; they increased greatly in

importance in the Liassic seas.

[Illustration: Fig. 89.--Pentacrinites Briareus. Half natural size.]

The _Ammonites_, a curious genus of Cephalopoda, which made their first

appearance in small numbers towards the close of the preceding Triassic

period, become quite special in the Secondary epoch, with the close of

which they disappear altogether. They were very abundant in the Jurassic

period, and, as we have already said, each zone is characterised by its

peculiar species. The name is taken from the resemblance of the shell to

the ram’s-horn ornaments which decorated the front of the temple of

Jupiter Ammon and the bas-reliefs and statues of that pagan deity. They

were Cephalopodous Mollusca with circular shells, rolled upon themselves

symmetrically in the same plane, and divided into a series of chambers.

The animal only occupied the outer chamber of the shell; all the others

were empty. A siphon or tube issuing from the first chamber traversed

all the others in succession, as is seen in all the Ammonites and

Nautili. This tube enabled the animal to rise to the surface, or to sink

to the bottom, for the Ammonite could fill the chambers with water at

pleasure, or empty them, thus rendering itself lighter or heavier as

occasion required. The Nautilus of our seas is provided with the same

curious organisation, and reminds us forcibly of the Ammonites of

geological times.

Shells are the only traces which remain of the Ammonites. We have no

exact knowledge of the animal which occupied and built them. The attempt

at restoration, as exhibited in Fig. 91, will probably convey a fair

idea of the Ammonite when living. We assume that it resembled the

Nautilus of modern times. What a curious aspect these early seas must

have presented, covered by myriads of these Molluscs of all sizes,

swimming about in eager pursuit of their prey!

The Ammonites of the Jurassic age present themselves in a great variety

of forms and sizes; some of them of great beauty. _Ammonites bifrons_,

_A. Noditianus_, _A. bisulcatus_, _A. Turneri_ (Fig. 90), and _A.

margaritatus_, are forms characteristic of the Lias.

[Illustration: Fig. 90.--Ammonites Turneri, from the Lower Lias.]

The _Belemnites_, molluscous Cephalopods of a very curious organisation,

appeared in great numbers, and for the first time, in the Jurassic seas.

Of this Mollusc we only possess the fossilised internal “bone,”

analogous to that of the modern cuttle-fish and the calamary of the

present seas. This simple relic is very far from giving us an exact idea

of what the animal was to which the name of Belemnite has been given

(from Βελεμνον, _a dart_) from their supposed resemblance to the head of

a javelin. The slender cylindrical bone, the only vestige remaining to

us, was merely the internal skeleton of the animal. When first

discovered they were called, by the vulgar, “Thunder-stones” and

“Ladies’ fingers.” They were, at last, inferred to be the shelly

processes of some sort of ancient cuttle-fish. Unlike the Ammonite,

which floated on the surface and sunk to the bottom at pleasure, the

Belemnite, it has been thought, swam nearer the bottom of the sea, and

seized its prey from below.

[Illustration: Fig. 91.--Ammonite restored.]

[Illustration: Fig. 92.--Belemnite restored.]

In Fig. 92 is given a restoration of the living Belemnite, by Dr.

Buckland and Professor Owen, in which the terminal part of the animal is

marked in a slightly darker tint, to indicate the place of the bone

which alone represents in our days this fossilised being. A sufficiently

exact idea of this Mollusc may be arrived at from the existing

cuttle-fish. Like the cuttle-fish, the Belemnite secreted a black

liquid, a sort of ink or sepia; and the bag containing the ink has

frequently been found in a fossilised state, with the ink dried up, and

elaborate drawings have been made with this fossil pigment.

The beaks, or horny mandibles of the mouth, which the Belemnite

possessed in common with the other naked Cephalopoda, are represented in

Fig. 78, p. 181.

As Sir H. De la Beche has pointed out, the destruction of the animals

whose remains are known to us by the name of Belemnites was exceedingly

great when the upper part of the Lias of Lyme Regis was deposited.

Multitudes seem to have perished almost simultaneously, and millions are

entombed in a bed beneath Golden Cap, a lofty cliff between Lyme Regis

and Bridport Harbour, as well as in the upper Lias generally.[62]

[62] De la Beche’s “Geological Manual,” 3rd ed., p. 447.

Among the Belemnites characteristic of the Liassic period may be cited

_B. acutus_ (Fig. 93), _B. pistiliformis_, and _B. sulcatus_.

[Illustration: Fig. 93.--Belemnites acutus.]

The seas of the period contained a great number of the fishes called

_Ganoids_; which are so called from the splendour of the hard and

enamelled scales, which formed a sort of defensive armour to protect

their bodies. _Lepidotus gigas_ was a fish of great size belonging to

this age. A smaller fish was the _Tetragonolepis_, or _Æchmodus Buchii_.

The _Acrodus nobilis_, of which the teeth are still preserved, and

popularly known by the name of _fossil leeches_, was a fish of which an

entire skeleton has never been met with. Neither are we better informed

as to the _Hybodus reticulatus_. The bony spines, which form the

anterior part of the dorsal fin of this fish, had long been an object of

curiosity to geologists, under the general name of _Ichthyodorulites_,

before they were known to be fragments of the fin of the _Hybodus_. The

Ichthyodorulites were supposed by some naturalists to be the jaw of some

animal--by others, weapons like those of the living _Balistes_ or

_Silurus_; but Agassiz has shown them to be neither the one nor the

other, but bony spines on the fin, like those of the living genera of

_Cestracions_ and _Chimæras_, in both of which the concave face is armed

with small spines like those of the _Hybodus_. The spines were simply

imbedded in the flesh, and attached to it by strong muscles. “They

served,” says Dr. Buckland, “as in the _Chimæra_, to raise and depress

the fin, their action resembling that of a movable mast lowering

backward.”

[Illustration: Fig. 94.--Ichthyosaurus communis.]

Let us hasten to say, however, that these are not the beings that

characterised the age, and were the salient features of the generation

of animals which existed during the Jurassic period. These

distinguishing features are found in the enormous reptiles with lizard’s

head, crocodile’s conical teeth, the trunk and tail of a quadruped,

whale-like paddles, and the double-concave vertebræ of fishes; and this

strange form, on such a gigantic scale that even their inanimate remains

are examined with a curiosity not unmixed with awe. The country round

Lyme Regis, in Dorsetshire, has long been celebrated for the curious

fossils discovered in its quarries, and preserved in the muddy

accumulations of the sea of the Liassic period. The country is

hilly--“up one hill and down another,” is a pretty correct provincial

description of the walk from Bridport to Lyme Regis--where some of the

most frightful creatures the living world has probably ever beheld,

sleep the sleep of stones. The quarries of Lyme Regis form the cemetery

of the Ichthyosauri; the sepulchre where lie interred these dragons of

the ancient seas.

In 1811 a country girl, who made her precarious living by picking up

fossils for which the neighbourhood was famous, was pursuing her

avocation, hammer in hand, when she perceived some bones projecting a

little out of the cliff. Finding, on examination, that it was part of a

large skeleton, she cleared away the rubbish, and laid bare the whole

creature imbedded in the block of stone. She hired workmen to dig out

the block of Lias in which it was buried. In this manner was the first

of these monsters brought to light: “a monster some thirty feet long,

with jaws nearly a fathom in length, and huge saucer-eyes; which have

since been found so perfect, that the petrified lenses have been split

off and used as magnifiers,” as a writer in _All the Year Round_ assures

us.

[Illustration: Fig. 95.--Head of Ichthyosaurus platydon.]

In Fig. 95 the head of _I. platydon_ is represented. As in the Saurians,

the openings of the nostrils are situated near the anterior angle of the

orbits of the eyes, while those of the Crocodile are near the snout;

but, on the other hand, in its osteology and its mode of dentition it

nearly resembles the Crocodile; the teeth are pointed and conical--not,

however, set in deep or separate sockets, but only implanted in a long

and deep continuous groove hollowed in the bones of the jaw. These

strong jaws have an enormous opening; for, in some instances, they have

been found eight feet in length and armed with 160 teeth. Let us add

that teeth lost through the voracity of the animal, or in contests with

other animals, could be renewed many times; for, at the inner side of

the base of every old tooth, there is always the bony germ of a new one.

The eyes of this marine monster were much larger than those of any

animal now living; in volume they frequently exceed the human head, and

their structure was one of their most remarkable peculiarities. In front

of the sclerotic coat or capsule of the eye there is an annular series

of thin bony plates, surrounding the pupil. This structure, which is now

only met with in the eyes of certain turtles, tortoises, and lizards,

and in those of many birds, could be used so as to increase or diminish

the curvature of the transparent cornea, and thus increase or diminish

the magnifying power, according to the requirements of the

animal--performing the office, in short, of a telescope or microscope at

pleasure. The eyes of the Ichthyosaurus were, then, an optical apparatus

of wonderful power and of singular perfection, enabling the animal, by

their power of adaptation and intensity of vision, to see its prey far

and near, and to pursue it in the darkness and in the depths of the sea.

The curious arrangement of bony plates we have described furnished,

besides, to its globular eye, the power necessary to bear the pressure

of a considerable weight of water, as well as the violence of the waves,

when the animal came to the surface to breathe, and raised its head

above the waves. This magnificent specimen of the fish-lizard, or

Ichthyosaurus, as it was named by Dr. Ure, now forms part of the

treasures of the British Museum.

At no period in the earth’s history have Reptiles occupied so important

a place as they did in the Jurassic period. Nature seems to have wished

to bring this class of animals to the highest state of development. The

great Reptiles of the Lias are as complicated in their structure as the

Mammals which appeared at a later period. They probably lived, for the

most part, by fishing in shallow creeks and bays defended from heavy

breakers, or in the open sea; but they seem to have sought the shore

from time to time; they crawled along the beach, covered with a soft

skin, perhaps not unlike some of our Cetaceæ. The Ichthyosaurus, from

its form and strength, may have braved the waves of the sea as the

porpoise does now. Its destructiveness and voracity must have been

prodigious, for Dr. Buckland describes a specimen which had between its

ribs, in the place where the stomach might be supposed to have been

placed, the skeleton of a smaller one--a proof that this monster, not

content with preying on its weaker neighbours, was in the habit of

devouring its own kind. In the same waters lived the Plesiosaurus, with

long neck and form more strange than that of the Ichthyosaurus; and

these potentates of the seas were warmed by the same sun and tenanted

the same banks, in the midst of a vegetation not unlike that which the

climate of Africa now produces.

The great Saurians in the Lias of Lyme Regis seem to have suffered a

somewhat sudden death, partly in consequence of a series of small

catastrophes suddenly destroying the animals then existing in particular

spots. “In general the bones are not scattered about, and in a detached

state, as would happen if the dead animal had descended to the bottom of

the sea, to be decomposed, or devoured piecemeal, as, indeed, might also

happen if the creature floated for a time on the surface, one animal

devouring one part, and another carrying off a different portion; on the

contrary, the bones of the skeleton, though frequently compressed, as

must arise from the enormous pressure to which they have so long been

subjected, are tolerably connected, frequently in perfect, or nearly

perfect, order, as if prepared by the anatomist. The skin, moreover, may

sometimes be traced, and the compressed contents of the intestines may

at times be also observed--all tending to show that the animals were

suddenly destroyed, and as suddenly preserved.”[63]

[63] “Geological Manual,” by H. T. De la Beche, 3rd ed., p. 346.

These strange and gigantic Saurians seem almost to disappear during the

succeeding geological periods; for, although they have been discovered

as low down as the Trias in Germany, and as high up as the Chalk in

England, they only appear as stragglers in these epochs; so, too, the

Reptiles, the existing Saurians are, as it were, only the shadowy,

feeble representatives of these powerful races of the ancient world.

Confining ourselves to well-established facts, we shall consider in some

detail the best known of these fossil reptiles--the _Ichthyosaurus_,

_Plesiosaurus_, and _Pterodactyle_.

The extraordinary creature which bears the name of _Ichthyosaurus_ (from

the Greek words Ιχθυς σαυρος, signifying fish-lizard), presents certain

dispositions and organic arrangements which are met with dispersed in

certain classes of animals now living, but they never seem to be again

reunited in any single individual. It possesses, as Cuvier says, the

snout of a dolphin, the head of a lizard, the jaws and teeth of a

crocodile, the vertebræ of a fish, the head and sternum of a lizard, the

paddles like those of a whale, and the trunk and tail of a quadruped.

Bayle appears to have furnished the best idea of the Ichthyosaurus by

describing it as the Whale of the Saurians--the Cetacean of the

primitive seas. It was, in fact, an animal exclusively marine; which, on

shore, would rest motionless like an inert mass. Its whale-like paddles,

and fish-like vertebræ, the length of the tail and other parts of its

structure, prove that its habits were aquatic; as the remains of fishes

and reptiles, and the form of its teeth, show that it was carnivorous.

Like the Whale, also, the Ichthyosaurus breathed atmospheric air; so

that it was under the necessity of coming frequently to the surface of

the water, like that inhabitant of the deep. We can even believe, with

Bayle, that it was provided, like the Whale, with vents or blowers,

through which it ejected, in columns into the air, the water it had

swallowed.

The dimensions of the Ichthyosaurus varied with the species, of which

five are known and described. These are _Ichthyosaurus communis_, _I.

platydon_, _I. intermedius_, _I. tenuirostris_, and _I. Cuvierii_, the

largest being more than thirty feet in length.

[Illustration: Fig. 96.--Ichthyosaurus platydon.]

[Illustration: Fig. 97.--Lower jaw of Ichthyosaurus. (Dr. Buckland.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 98.--Skeleton of Ichthyosaurus.

Containing teeth and bones of Fishes in a coprolitic form. One-fifteenth

natural size.]

The short, thick neck of the Ichthyosaurus supported a capacious head,

and was continued backwards, from behind the eyes, in a column composed

of more than a hundred vertebræ. The animal being adapted, like the

whale, for rapid movement through the water, its vertebræ had none of

the invariable solidity of those of the Lizard or Crocodile, but rather

the structure and lightness of those of Fishes. The section of these

vertebræ presents two hollow cones, connected only by their summits to

the centre of the vertebræ, which would permit of the utmost flexibility

of movement. The ribs extended along the entire length of the vertebral

column, from the head to the pelvis. The bones of the sternum, or that

part of the frame which supported the paddles, present the same

combinations with those of the sternum in the Ornithorhynchus, or

Duck-billed Platypus, of New Holland, an animal which presents the

singular combination of a mammalian furred quadruped having the bill of

a duck and webbed feet; which dived to the bottom of the water in search

of its food, and returned to the surface to breathe the air. In this

phenomenon of living Nature the Creator seems to have repeated, in our

days, the organic arrangements which he had originally provided for the

Ichthyosaurus.

In order that the animal should be able to move with rapidity in the

water, both its anterior and posterior members were converted into fins

or paddles. The anterior fins were half as large again as the posterior.

In some species each paddle was made up of nearly a hundred bones, of

polygonal form, and disposed in series representing the phalanges of the

fingers. This hand, jointed at the arm, bears resemblance, in

osteological construction, to the paddles, without distinct fingers, of

the Porpoise and the Whale. A specimen of the posterior fin of _I.

communis_, discovered at Barrow-on-Soar, in Leicestershire, in 1840, by

Sir Philip Egerton, exhibited on its posterior margin the remains of

cartilaginous rays, which bifurcated as they approached the edge, like

those in the fins of a fish. “It had previously been supposed,” says

Professor Owen, “that the locomotive organs were enveloped, while

living, in a smooth integument, like that of the turtle and porpoise,

which has no other support than is afforded by the bones and ligaments

within; but it now appears that the fin was much larger, expanding far

beyond the osseous frame-work, and deviating widely in its fish-like

rays from the ordinary reptilian type.” The Professor believes that,

besides the fore-paddles, these stiff-necked Saurians were furnished at

the end of the tail with a fin to assist them in turning, not placed

horizontally, as in the whale, but vertically, forming a powerful

instrument of progression and motion. It is obvious that the

Ichthyosaurus was an animal powerfully armed for offence and defence. We

cannot say, with certainty, whether the skin was smooth, like that of

the whale or lizard, or covered with scales, like the great reptiles of

our own age. Nevertheless, as the scales of the Fishes and the cuirass

and horny armour of other Reptiles of the Lias are preserved, and as no

such defensive scales have been found belonging to the Ichthyosaurus, it

is probable that the skin was naked and smooth. The tail, composed of

from eighty to eighty-five vertebræ, was provided with large and long

paddles, arranged vertically as in the Whale.

It is curious to see to what a degree of perfection has been carried, in

our days, the knowledge of the antediluvian animals, their habits, and

their economy. Fig. 98 represents the skeleton of an Ichthyosaurus found

in the Lias of Lyme Regis, which still retains in its abdominal cavity

coprolites, that is to say, the residue of digestion. The soft parts of

the intestinal canal have disappeared, but the _fæces_ themselves are

preserved, and their examination informs us as to the alimentary

regimen of this animal which has perished from the earth many thousands,

perhaps millions, of years. Mary Anning, to whom we owe many of the

discoveries made in the neighbourhood of Lyme Regis, her native place,

had in her collection an enormous coprolite of the Ichthyosaurus. This

coprolite (Fig. 99) contained some bones and scales of Fishes, and of

divers Reptiles, well enough preserved to have their species identified.

It only remains to be added that, among the bones, those of the

Ichthyosaurus were often found, especially those of young individuals.

The presence of the undigested remains of vertebræ and other bones of

animals of its own species in the coprolites of the Ichthyosaurus

proves, as we have already had occasion to remark, that this great

Saurian must have been a most voracious monster, since it habitually

devoured not only fish, but individuals of its own race--the smaller

becoming the prey of the larger. The structure of the jaw of the

Ichthyosaurus leads us to believe that the animal swallowed its prey

without dividing it. Its stomach and intestines must, then, have formed

a sort of pouch of great volume, filling entirely the abdominal cavity,

and corresponding in extent to the great development of the teeth and

jaws.

[Illustration: Fig. 99.--Coprolite, enclosing bones of small

Ichthyosaurus.]

[Illustration: Fig. 100.--Coprolite of Ichthyosaurus.]

The perfection with which its contents have been preserved in the

fossilised coprolites, furnishes indirect proofs that the intestinal

canal of the Ichthyosaurus resembled closely that of the shark and the

dog-fish--fishes essentially voracious and destructive, which have the

intestinal canal spirally convoluted, an arrangement which is exactly

that indicated in some of the coprolites of the Ichthyosaurus, as is

evident from the impressions which the folds of the intestine have left

on the coprolite, of which Fig. 100 is a representation. In the cliffs

near Lyme Regis coprolites are abundant in the Liassic formation, and

have been found disseminated through the shales and limestones along

many miles of that coast.

What an admirable privilege of science, which is able, by an examination

of the simplest parts in the organisation of beings which lived ages

ago, to give to our minds such solid teachings and such true enjoyments!

“When we discover,” says Dr. Buckland, “in the body of an Ichthyosaurus

the food which it has engulfed an instant before its death, when the

intervals between its sides present themselves still filled with the

remains of fishes which it had swallowed some ten thousand years ago, or

a time even twice as great, all these immense intervals vanish, time

disappears, and we find ourselves, so to speak, thrown into immediate

contact with events which took place in epochs immeasurably distant, as

if we occupied ourselves with the affairs of the previous day.”

[Illustration: Fig. 101.--Skull of Plesiosaurus restored. (Conybeare.)

_a_, profile; _b_, seen from above.]

The name of _Plesiosaurus_ (from the Greek words πλησιος, _near_, and

σαυρος, _lizard_) reminds us that this animal, though presenting many

peculiarities of general structure, is allied by its organisation to the

Saurian or Lizard family, and, consequently, to the Ichthyosaurus.

The Plesiosaurus presents, in its organic structure, the most curious

assemblage we have met with among the organic vestiges of the ancient

world. The Plesiosaurus was a marine, air-breathing, carnivorous

reptile, combining the characters of the head of a Lizard, the teeth of

a Crocodile, a neck of excessive length resembling that of a Swan, the

ribs of a Chameleon, a body of moderate size, and a very short tail,

and, finally, four paddles resembling those of a Whale. Let us bestow a

glance upon the remains of this strange animal which the earth has

revealed, and which science has restored to us.

The head of the Plesiosaurus presents a combination of the characters

belonging to the Ichthyosaurus, the Crocodile, and the Lizard. Its

enormously long neck comprises a greater number of vertebræ than the

neck of either the Camel, the Giraffe, or even the Swan, which of all

the feathered race has the longest neck in comparison to the rest of the

body. And it is to be remarked, that, contrary to what obtains in the

Mammals, where the vertebræ of the neck are always seven, the vertebræ

in birds increase in number with the length of the neck.

[Illustration: Fig. 102.--Skeleton of Plesiosaurus dolichodeirus

restored. (Conybeare principally.)]

The body is cylindrical and rounded, like that of the great marine

Turtles. It was, doubtless, naked, _i.e._, not protected with the scales

or carapace with which some authors have invested it; for no traces of

such coverings have been found near any of the skeletons which have been

hitherto discovered. The dorsal vertebræ are attached to each other by

nearly plane surfaces like those of terrestrial quadrupeds, a mode of

arrangement which must have deprived the whole of its vertebral column

of much of its flexibility. Each pair of ribs surrounded the body with a

complete girdle, formed of five pieces, as in the Chameleon and Iguana;

whence, no doubt, as with the Chameleon, great facilities existed for

the contraction and dilatation of the lungs.

[Illustration: Fig. 103.--Sternum and pelvis of Plesiosaurus. Pub.,

pubis; Isch., ischium; Il., ilium.]

The breast, the pelvis, and the bones of the anterior and posterior

extremities furnished an apparatus which permitted the Plesiosaurus,

like the Ichthyosaurus and existing Cetaceans, to sink in the water and

return to the surface at pleasure (Fig. 103). Prof. Owen, in his “Report

on British Reptiles,” characterises them as air-breathing and

cold-blooded animals; the proof that they respired atmospheric air

immediately, being found in the position and structure of the nasal

passages, and the bony mechanism of the thoracic duct and abdominal

cavity. In the first, the size and position of the external nostrils

(Fig. 102), combined with the structure of the paddles, indicate a

striking analogy between the extinct Saurians and the Cetaceans,

offering, as the Professor observes, “a beautiful example of the

adaptation of structure to the peculiar exigencies of species.” While

the evidence that they were cold-blooded animals is found in the

flexible or unanchylosed condition of the osseous pieces of the occiput

and other cranial bones of the lower jaw, and of the vertebral column;

from which the Professor draws the conclusion that the heart was adapted

for transmitting a part only of the blood through the respiratory

organs; the absence of the ball-and-socket articulations of the bones of

the vertebræ, the position of the nostrils near the summit of the head,

the numerous short and flat digital bones, which must have been

enveloped in a simple undivided integumentary sheath, forming in both

fore and hind extremities a paddle closely resembling that of the living

Cetacea. The paddles are larger and more powerful than those of the

Ichthyosaurus, to compensate for the slight assistance the animal

derived from the tail. The latter--shorter, as compared with the length

of the rest of the body, than in the Ichthyosaurus--was more calculated

to act the part of a rudder, in directing the course of the animal

through the water, than as a powerful organ of propulsion.

[Illustration: Fig. 104.--Remains of Plesiosaurus macrocephalus.

One-twelfth natural size.]

Such were the strange combinations of form and structure in the

Plesiosaurus and Ichthyosaurus--genera of animals whose remains have,

after an interment extending to unknown thousands of years, been

revealed to light and submitted to examination; nay, rebuilt, bone by

bone, until we have the complete skeletons before us, and the habits of

the animals described, as if they had been observed in life. Conybeare

thus speaks of the supposed habits of these extinct forms, which he had

built up from scanty materials: “That the Plesiosaurus was aquatic is

evident from the form of its paddles; that it was marine is equally so,

from the remains with which it is universally associated; that it may

have occasionally visited the shore, the resemblance of its extremities

to the turtle may lead us to conjecture; its motion, however, must have

been very awkward on land; its long neck must have impeded its progress

through the water, presenting a striking contrast to the organisation

which so admirably fits the Ichthyosaurus for cutting through the waves.

May it not, therefore, be concluded that it swam on or near the surface,

arching back its long neck like the swan, and occasionally darting it

down at the fish which happened to float within its reach? It may,

perhaps, have lurked in shallow water along the coasts, concealed among

the sea-weeds, and, raising its nostrils to the surface from a

considerable depth, may have found a secure retreat from the assaults of

dangerous enemies, while the length and flexibility of its neck may have

compensated for the want of strength in its jaws, and incapacity for

swift motion through the water, by the suddenness and agility of the

attack they enabled it to make on every animal fitted to become its

prey.”

The Plesiosaurus was first described by the Rev. W. D. Conybeare and Sir

Henry De la Beche, in the “Geological Society’s Transactions” for 1821,

and a restoration of _P. dolichodeirus_, the most common of these

fossils, appeared in the same work for 1824. The first specimen was

discovered, as the Ichthyosaurus had been previously, in the Lias of

Lyme Regis; since then other individuals and species have been found in

the same geological formation in various parts of England, Ireland,

France, and Germany, and with such variations of structure that

Professor Owen has felt himself justified in recording sixteen distinct

species, of which we have represented _P. dolichodeirus_ (Fig. 102), as

restored by Conybeare, and _P. macrocephalus_ (Fig. 104), with its

skeleton, as moulded from the limestone of Lyme Regis, which has been

placed in the Palæontological Gallery of the British Museum.

[Illustration: XV.--Ideal scene of the Lias with Ichthyosaurus and

Plesiosaurus.]

The Plesiosaurus was scarcely so large as the Ichthyosaurus. The

specimen of _I. platydon_ in the British Museum probably belonged to an

animal four-and-twenty feet long, and some are said to indicate thirty

feet, while there are species of Plesiosauri measuring eighteen and

twenty, the largest known specimen of _Plesiosaurus Cramptoni_ found in

the lias of Yorkshire, and now in the Museum of the Royal Society of

Dublin, being twenty-two feet four inches in length. On the opposite

page (PLATE XV.) an attempt is made to represent these grand reptiles of

the Lias in their native element, and as they lived.

Cuvier says of the Plesiosaurus, “that it presents the most monstrous

assemblage of characteristics that has been met with among the races of

the ancient world.” This expression should not be understood in a

literal sense; there are no monsters in Nature; in no living creature

are the laws of organisation ever positively infringed; and it is more

in accordance with the general perfection of creation to see in an

organisation so special, in a structure which differs so notably from

that of the animals of our own days, the simple development of a type,

and sometimes also the introduction of beings, and successive changes in

their structure. We shall see, in examining the curious series of

animals of the ancient world, that the organisation and physiological

functions go on improving unceasingly, and that each of the extinct

genera which preceded the appearance of man, present, for each organ,

modifications which always tend towards greater perfection. The fins of

the fishes of Devonian seas become the paddles of the Ichthyosauri and

of the Plesiosauri; these, in their turn, become the membranous foot of

the Pterodactyle, and, finally, the wing of the bird. Afterwards comes

the articulated fore-foot of the terrestrial mammalia, which, after

attaining remarkable perfection in the hand of the ape, becomes,

finally, the arm and hand of man, an instrument of wonderful delicacy

and power, belonging to an enlightened being gifted with the divine

attribute of reason! Let us, then, dismiss any idea of monstrosity with

regard to these antediluvian animals; let us learn, on the contrary, to

recognise, with admiration, the divine proofs of design which they

display, and in their organisation to see only the handiwork of the

Creator.

Another strange inhabitant of the ancient world, the _Pterodactylus_

(from πτερον, _a wing_, and δακτυλος, _a finger_), discovered in 1828,

made Cuvier pronounce it to be incontestably the most extraordinary of

all the extinct animals which had come under his consideration; and such

as, if we saw them restored to life, would appear most strange and

dissimilar to anything that now exists. In size and general form, and in

the disposition and character of its wings, this fossil genus, according

to Cuvier, somewhat resembled our modern bats and vampyres, but had its

beak elongated like the bill of a woodcock, and armed with teeth like

the snout of a crocodile; its vertebræ, ribs, pelvis, legs, and feet

resembled those of a lizard; its three anterior fingers terminated in

long hooked claws like that on the fore-finger of the bat; and over its

body was a covering, neither composed of feathers as in the bird, nor of

hair as in the bat, but probably a naked skin; in short, it was a

monster resembling nothing that has ever been heard of upon earth,

except the dragons of romance and heraldry. Moreover, it was probably

noctivagous and insectivorous, and in both these points resembled the

bat; but differed from it in having the most important bones in its body

constructed after the manner of those of reptiles.

[Illustration: Fig. 105.--Pterodactylus crassirostris.]

“Thus, like Milton’s fiend, all-qualified for all services and all

elements, the creature was a fit companion for the kindred reptiles that

swarmed in the seas, or crawled on the shores, of a turbulent planet:

“The Fiend,

O’er bog, or steep, through strait, rough, dense, or rare,

With head, hands, wings, or feet, pursues his way,

And sinks, or swims, or wades, or creeps, or flies.

_Paradise Lost_, Book II., line 947.

“With flocks of such-like creatures flying in the air, and shoals of

Ichthyosauri and Plesiosauri swarming in the ocean, and gigantic

Crocodiles and Tortoises crawling on the shores of primæval lakes and

rivers--air, sea, and land must have been strangely tenanted in these

early periods of our infant world.”[64]

[64] Professor Buckland on the Pterodactylus. “Trans. Geol. Soc.,” 2nd

series, vol. iii., p. 217.

[Illustration: Fig. 106.--Pterodactylus brevirostris.]

The strange structure of this animal gave rise to most contradictory

opinions from the earlier naturalists. One supposed it to be a bird,

another a bat, and others a flying reptile. Cuvier was the first to

detect the truth, and to prove, from its organisation, that the animal

was a Saurian. “Behold,” he says, “an animal which in its osteology,

from its teeth to the end of its claws, presents all the characters of

the Saurians; nor can we doubt that their characteristics existed in its

integuments and softer parts, in its scales, its circulation, its

generative organs: it was at the same time provided with the means of

flight; but when stationary it could not have made much use of its

anterior extremities, even if it did not keep them always folded as

birds fold their wings. It might, it is true, use its small anterior

fingers to suspend itself from the branches of trees; but when at rest

it must have been generally on its hind feet, like the birds again, and

like them it must have carried its neck half-erect and curved backwards,

so that its enormous head should not disturb its equilibrium.” This

diversity of opinion need not very much surprise us after all, for, with

the body and tail of an ordinary mammal, it had the form of a bird in

its head and the length of its neck, of the bat in the structure and

proportion of its wings, and of a reptile in the smallness of its head

and in its beak, armed with at least sixty equal sharp-pointed teeth,

differing little in form and size.

Dr. Buckland describes eight distinct species, varying in size from a

snipe to a cormorant. Of these, _P. crassirostris_ (Fig. 105) and _P.

brevirostris_ (Fig. 106), were both discovered in the Lias of

Solenhofen. _P. macronyx_ belongs to the Lias of Lyme Regis.

The Pterodactyle was, then, a reptile provided with wings somewhat

resembling those of Bats, and formed, as in that Mammal, of a membrane

which connected the body with the excessively elongated phalanges of the

fourth finger, which served to expand the membrane that answered the

purposes of a wing. The Pterodactyle of the Liassic period was, as we

have seen, an animal of small size; the largest species in the older

Lias beds did not exceed ten or twelve inches in length, or the size of

a raven, while the later forms found fossil in the Greensand and Wealden

beds must have measured more than sixteen feet between the tips of the

expanded wings. On the other hand, its head was of enormous dimensions

compared with the rest of the body. We cannot admit, therefore, that

this animal could really fly, and, like a bird, beat the air. The

membranous appendage which connected its long finger with its body was

rather a parachute than a wing. It served to moderate the velocity of

its descent when it dropped on its prey from a height. Essentially a

climber, it could only raise itself by climbing up tall trees or rocks,

after the manner of lizards, and throw itself thence to the ground, or

upon the lower branches, by making use of its natural parachute.

The ordinary position of the Pterodactyle was probably upon its two hind

feet, the lower extremities being adapted for standing and moving on the

ground, after the manner of birds. Habitually, perhaps, it perched on

trees; it could creep, or climb along rocks and cliffs, or suspend

itself from trees, with the assistance of its claws and feet, after the

manner of existing Bats. It is even probable, Dr. Buckland thought, that

it had the power of swimming and diving, so common to reptiles, and

possessed by the Vampyre Bat of the island of Bonin. It is believed that

the smaller species lived upon insects, and the larger preyed upon

fishes, upon which it could throw itself like the sea-gull.

The most startling feature in the organisation of this animal is the

strange combination of two powerful wings attached to the body of a

reptile. The imagination of the poets long dwelt on such a combination;

the _Dragon_ was a creation of their fancy, and it played a great part

in fable and in pagan mythology. The Dragon, or flying reptile,

breathing fire and poisoning the air with his fiery breath, had,

according to the fable, disputed with man the possession of the earth.

Gods and demigods claimed, among their most famous exploits, the glory

of having vanquished this powerful and redoubtable monster.

Among the animals of our epoch, only a single reptile is found provided

with wings, or digital appendages analogous to the membranous wings of

the bats, and which can be compared to the Pterodactyle. This is called

the _Dragon_, one of the Draconidæ, a family of Saurians, which has been

described by Daudin, as distinguished by the first six ribs, instead of

hooping round the abdomen, extending in nearly a straight line, and

sustaining a prolongation of skin which forms a sort of wing analogous

to that of the Pterodactyle. Independent of the four feet, this wing

sustains the animal, like a parachute, as it leaps from branch to

branch; but the creature has no power to beat the air with it as birds

do when flying. This reptile lives in the forests of the hottest parts

of Africa, and in some isles of the Indian Ocean, especially in Sumatra

and Java. The only known species is that figured at page 238 (Fig. 107),

which comes from the East Indies.

What a strange population was that which occupied the earth at this

stage of its history, when the waters were filled with creatures so

extraordinary as those whose history we have traced! Plesiosauri and

Ichthyosauri filled the seas, upon the surface of which floated

innumerable Ammonites in light skiffs, some of them as large as a

good-sized cart-wheel, while gigantic Turtles and Crocodiles crawled on

the banks of the rivers and lakes. Only one genus of Mammals had yet

appeared, but no birds; nothing broke the silence of the air, if we

except the breathing of the terrestrial reptiles and the flight of

winged insects.

The earth cooled progressively up to the Jurassic period, the rains lost

their continuity and abundance, and the pressure of the atmosphere

sensibly diminished. All these circumstances favoured the appearance

and the multiplication of innumerable species of animals, whose singular

forms then showed themselves on the earth. We can scarcely imagine the

prodigious quantity of Molluscs and Zoophytes whose remains lie buried

in the Jurassic rocks, forming entire strata of immense thickness and

extent.

[Illustration: Fig. 107.--Draco volans.]

The same circumstances concurred to favour the production of plants. If

the shores and seas of the period received such a terrible aspect from

the formidable animals we have described, the vegetation which covered

the land had also its peculiar character and appearance. Nothing that we

know of in the existing scenery of the globe surpasses the rich

vegetation which decorated the continents of the Jurassic period. A

temperature still of great elevation, a humid atmosphere, and, we have

no reason to doubt, a brilliant sun, promoted the growth of a luxuriant

vegetation, such as some of the tropical islands, with their burning

temperature and maritime climate, can only give us an idea of, while it

recalls some of the Jurassic types of vegetation. The elegant Voltzias

of the Trias had disappeared, but the Horse-tails (_Equiseta_) remained,

whose slender and delicate stems rose erect in the air with their

graceful panicles; the gigantic rushes also remained; and though the

tree-ferns had lost their enormous dimensions of the Carboniferous age,

they still preserved their fine and delicately-cut leaves.

Alongside these vegetable families, which passed upwards from the

preceding age, an entire family--the Cycads (Fig. 72, p. 168)--appear

for the first time. They soon became numerous in genera, such as

Zamites, Pterophyllum (Williamsonia), and Nilssonia. Among the species

which characterise this age, we may cite the following, arranging them

in families:--

The World Before the Deluge · 第 49 / 102 题