They could not know that he had acted, at least at first, out of hate

for their slavery and folly and baseness, out of a fierce unwillingness

to be slavish and foolish and base along with them. He who had had a

hand in ruling an empire would not submit to being counted among the

docile subjects of the province to which he had been banished. Private

resentment had stirred him to public rebellion. He could not help it

if what he had done for hate was the same as if he had done it for

love. Such an outcome was only another proof that the world was wrong.

Like Gulliver in Lilliput, wading home with the Blefuscudian fleet at

the end of a packthread, Swift decently exulted. But he would not let

himself forget that the adventure had taken place among the pigmies.

Whatever he accomplished was a small affair. Great affairs were always

maddeningly beyond him, or, he remembered his days with Oxford, behind

him.

VI

TRAVELLER

1

Swift never set a foot outside Ireland or England except when he

hurried across Wales on his restless journeys between London, the

bright centre of his world, and Dublin, the dreary margin. Though he

constantly diverted himself with books of travel, he found in them

nothing which convinced him that he would anywhere meet more wisdom or

less folly than he everywhere observed. The Scotch were a “poor, fierce

northern people,” the Dutch grasping and shifty, the French frivolous

and Catholic. If he had some liking for the Swedes it was because he

was fascinated by Charles XII, that sudden, terrific king who had

burst upon Europe from his cold peninsula and stirred philosophers to

admiration by such a career as Swift would have chosen for himself. But

dividing mankind into nations was little more than drawing lines on a

map. The whole earth was inhabited by the human race.

Once Swift had hopes of going to Austria, once to Sweden, once to

France. Each time prevented, he hardly grumbled. If he thought of other

countries it was for their better climate, which might, he said, have

kept his wit and humour lively, as Ireland’s had not. “I imagine,” he

wrote in 1724, “France would be proper for me now, and Italy ten years

hence.” But he could not rouse himself from thinking about the world

to travel far to look at it. There was his giddiness, which might at

any time make him reel and fall. There was his deafness, which forced

him to live “among those whom I can govern and make them comply with my

infirmities.” There was the prospect of blindness. “My eyes will not

suffer me to read small prints, nor anything by candlelight, and if I

grow blind, as well as deaf, I must needs become very grave and wise

and insignificant.” He was caged in Ireland, with nothing to do but

pace his cage.

In Ireland, however, Swift was not confined to the cramped cottage at

Laracor or to the hollow deanery in Dublin. During the twelve unbroken

years of his banishment after 1714 he often visited other houses. His

hosts could never have enough of him. Near Laracor were the houses of

Peter Ludlow, George Rochfort, and Knightley Chetwoode. Near Dublin

were the houses of the Grattans and Patrick Delaney and Charles

Ford, with whom Stella spent a summer. Forty miles from Dublin was

Thomas Sheridan’s ramshackle house which Swift could sometimes have

to himself. He is said to have visited an ancestor of the Earls of

Llandaff in Tipperary. He visited the Ashes--St. George Ashe had been

Swift’s college tutor--at Clogher in Tyrone, Robert Cope in Armagh, the

Bishop of Dromore in Down. And during the summers of 1722 and 1723,

when banishment had become almost unendurable, Swift made long, lonely

journeys to the north and to the south. “I have shifted scenes,” he

told Vanessa in July 1722, “oftener than I ever did in my life, and I

believe I have lain in thirty beds since I left the town.”

Six hundred miles in the north, five hundred in the south the year

following, all solitary and speculative. But these were not merely

random travels in search of change and health. Though Swift was still

incorrigibly Swift, he was also Gulliver, now with a purpose studying

the despicable ways of men.

Gulliver’s travels were Swift’s travels, disguised with Swift’s wit,

loaded with Swift’s hate. He gave years to them, as to nothing else

he ever wrote about, five or six years thinking of them as Martin

Scriblerus’s travels, nearly as long thinking of them as Gulliver’s or

his own. “I am now writing a History of my Travels,” Swift told Ford

in April 1721, “which will be a large volume, and gives account of

countries hitherto unknown; but they go on slowly for want of health

and humour.” By December of that year Bolingbroke knew about them. “I

long to see your Travels; for, take it as you will, I do not retract

what I said, and will undertake to find in two pages of your bagatelles

more good sense, useful knowledge, and true religion than you can show

me in the works of nineteen in twenty of the profound divines and

philosophers of the age.” In June 1722 Vanessa had read something about

the giants. In January 1724 Swift was near the end. “I have left the

Country of Horses,” he wrote to Ford, “and am in the Flying Island,

where I shall not stay long, and my two last journeys will soon be

over.” In July 1725 Bolingbroke referred to the pigmies and giants of

which he had heard. In August, Swift wrote to Ford: “I have finished my

Travels, and am now transcribing them. They are admirable things, and

will wonderfully mend the world.”

In September, after a summer at Sheridan’s house in the country,

Swift wrote to Pope: “I have employed my time, besides ditching, in

finishing, correcting, amending, and transcribing my Travels, in four

parts complete, newly augmented, and intended for the press when the

world shall deserve them, or rather when a printer shall be found brave

enough to venture his ears.” Thereafter all Swift’s friends waited

to see how he would, as he said, “vex the world rather than divert

it.” They could be sure he had written more than a story of imaginary

voyages in a book. This would be Swift’s revenge.

In the days of the Scriblerus Club it had been planned that Martin

on his first voyage should be carried “by a prosperous storm to a

discovery of the ancient Pygmean empire”; on his second should be

“happily shipwrecked on the land of the giants, the most humane people

in the world”; on his third should reach a “kingdom of philosophers who

govern by the mathematics”; and on his fourth should, among beings not

yet named, “display a vein of melancholy proceeding almost to a disgust

of his species.” These plans had broken up with the Club. Returning to

this theme, Swift saw that the bungling Martin would no longer serve.

If he were to be the traveller, much of the folly of the narrative

would have to appear in his misadventures. Better to let the traveller

be a plain, reasonable, unimaginative man who would report what he had

seen in the language of common sense.

Swift’s nature included such a Gulliver. It included, too, an observer

as alien to what went on around him as Gulliver could be on his most

distant, most surprising island. “My disaffection to the world ... has

never varied from the twenty-first ... year of my life.” Disaffection,

singularity, had driven Swift, no less than most men, to think of

himself as playing various rôles. At Kilkenny and Trinity he had been

a tragic hero, neglected and abused by fortune. At Moor Park he had

been a scholar in a garden, despising the rabble of wits and pedants.

At Laracor he had been a soldier in a garrison, when there were wars

elsewhere. In London he had been the conscience and voice of ministers,

insisting upon order and virtue in the state. In Dublin, exiled, he had

turned from governing to resisting and had made himself the hammer of

tyrants. Now he was a creature of a different race, thrown among men,

full of antipathy for them, but full also of a scornful curiosity.

It was the best rôle he ever found. Without once taking ship to the

corners of the earth as Gulliver did, Swift had moved about at home

too large for the pigmies, too small for the giants, too sensible

for the philosophers, too human for the animals. He had never been

able quite to adjust himself to the scale of life as other men lived

it. Other men, even when they had the pride of distinction, could

submit. Swift could not. As if he were really an alien to the race,

he had been obliged, whether he chose or not, to feel and act alien.

Only once in more than fifty years had he found an occupation which

truly involved him, and that only while a short delusion lasted. He

had been unwilling to take a wife, though women desired and loved

him. He had compromised so far as to have friends, but he was always

conscious of the exceptions he was making. “I have ever hated all

nations, professions, and communities, and all my love is towards

individuals.... But principally I hate and detest that animal called

man, although I heartily love John, Peter, Thomas, and so forth. This

is the system upon which I have governed myself many years.... Upon

this great foundation of misanthropy ... the whole building of my

Travels is erected; and I will never have peace of mind till all honest

men are of my opinion.”

If he had been fully alien he would not have troubled himself to be a

missionary. He was a man to the extent that he was a moralist as well

as a misanthrope. He would cure if he could. If not, he would punish.

“Drown the world! I am not content with despising it, but I would anger

it if I could with safety.” Here was the flaw in his misanthropy. Here

was the strain of humanity through which he could be fretted and hurt.

Here was the deep source of his fury. But he was alien enough to feel,

dramatically, that he was only a traveller in strange lands.

Yet Swift was not a Timon, bawling and railing. Swift’s misanthropy

was in his constitution, not in his disposition. His friends spoke

always of his sweetness, his charm, his delightful temper, his hearty

affections, his honest generosity. He had about him a magic almost like

beauty’s magic. Nor did they think of him as morose and surly, whatever

he said about himself. “Gulliver is a happy man,” said the experienced

Arbuthnot, “that at his age can write such a merry work.” Swift on his

travels could no more help the wit on his tongue than he could help the

detestation in his heart.

He was as ingenious as he was grave. He took pains, with a few slips,

to draw his pigmies and giants to scale, the pigmies an inch to a human

foot, the giants a foot to a human inch. He deftly commandeered the

inventions of earlier writers: Philostratus, Lucian, Rabelais, Cyrano

de Bergerac, Perrot d’Ablancourt, Tom Brown. The nautical terms paraded

in the voyage to Brobdingnag were copied almost word for word from

a mariner’s handbook. Swift did not disdain to parody contemporary

travellers. Whereas a mere misanthrope would have clamoured, a mere

moralist would have scolded, Swift, being a wit, was satisfied to tell

a story, pretending that he was a spectator who had no share in what he

told. There were the characters, there were the incidents. They could

be understood by anybody who had an understanding.

Consider the insectile people of Lilliput. Swift, in the guise of

Gulliver, was at first received with dread, then with wonder, then with

hospitality. Though they kept him a prisoner, they let him into the

secrets of the Court and of the government, which were preposterously

like England’s. The Lilliputian ministers to commend themselves to the

king capered before him on a tight-rope. Gulliver, whose mind was part

of Swift’s, remembered larger ministers. Flimnap, who could caper an

inch higher than any other lord in the empire, seemed remarkably like

Walpole. The great men of Lilliput who sought honours from their king

competed, by jumping over a stick held in his hand, for silken threads

six inches long, one blue, one red, one green, which reminded Gulliver

of the Order of the Garter, of the Bath, and of the Thistle.

Lilliput and the neighbouring Blefuscu had long been at war. A

Lilliputian schism was the cause. Formerly all the people had broken

their eggs at the larger end. One of their kings, having cut his finger

on the larger end of one of his eggs, had by royal edict made the

smaller end orthodox. There had been a civil war. Some of the defeated

conservatives had fled to Blefuscu and had there found refuge and

favour at the court. England, Gulliver reflected, had been entirely

Catholic before Henry VIII. The Catholic Pretender had fled to France,

and France had long been at war with England.

Grateful for the kindness shown him, Gulliver aided Lilliput in its

war by capturing the Blefuscudian fleet and bringing it as a gift to

his royal host. But the Lilliputians were no more grateful in return

than the English had been to the Oxford ministry for ending the war

with France. One party among the pigmies insisted that Blefuscu be

subjugated to a province with a viceroy, as some of the Whigs had

insisted France might be. The sourest of the tiny ministers became

Gulliver’s enemy, as the dismal Nottingham had become Swift’s.

Gulliver’s chief offence was that, when a fire broke out in the queen’s

apartment at the palace, he extinguished it in a manner more natural to

him than agreeable to the queen. Had not Queen Anne implacably resented

the spattering ridicule which Swift had let fall upon what he thought

was menacing the Church and State? Thereafter the position of Gulliver

in Lilliput was hopeless. The cabinet decided he must die. The friendly

minister Reldresal, who may have stood for Carteret, thought it would

be enough to blind Gulliver and allow him to starve to death.

From that compromise Gulliver escaped to Blefuscu, and back to England,

knowing that the smallest people in the world had all the familiar

follies and vices of mankind in general.

Next Swift, as Gulliver, was blown to the giants of Brobdingnag, that

humane people. It was his turn to be insectile. He was exhibited

as a toy freak by the kind, greedy farmer who had found him.

Scientists wondered what species he could belong to. The king, being

a philosopher, supposed that such creatures as Gulliver “have their

titles and distinctions of honour; they contrive little nests and

burrows that they call houses and cities; they make a figure in dress

and equipage; they love, they fight, they dispute, they cheat, they

betray.” And when Gulliver had defended his species by an account of

their government and politics, their wars and luxuries, the king,

being a humane philosopher, concluded “your natives to be the most

pernicious race of little odious vermin that nature ever suffered to

crawl upon the surface of the earth.”

He himself abominated mystery, refinement, and intrigue in governors.

He limited government “to common sense and reason, to justice and

lenity, to the speedy determination of civil and criminal causes.” He

held that “whoever could make two ears of corn or two blades of grass

grow upon a spot of ground where only one grew before would deserve

better of mankind ... than the whole race of politicians put together.”

Gulliver, or Swift, sardonically despaired of such a monarch. His

people were no better. Their learning was only in morality, history,

poetry, and useful mathematics. They were unable to form conceptions of

what Gulliver meant by “entities, abstractions, and transcendentals.”

They were dull with virtue and peace.

Gulliver found in their habits less to remind him of England than he

had found in Lilliput. His story was taken up with the ingenious shifts

by which he got along among them. But after the giants he could not so

easily return to the old scale of life as he could after the pigmies.

His own people seemed contemptible by their smallness. He was twice as

far from mankind as he had been before.

Swift’s, Gulliver’s, third voyage seems to have been to the Country

of Horses, but when he told the story he saved that for the venomous

conclusion and in the third place put the account of the Flying Island

and the continent which was topsy-turvy with philosophers.

Once more, as in Lilliput, he was often reminded of Europe. The name

of Laputa was like the Spanish for harlot. The island, when its rulers

wished, could hover over stubborn cities and shut out the sun, as

England shut out the sun from Ireland. Whether aloft or on land the

people were rapt in abstruse speculations or abandoned to fantastic

projects. Among the islanders nobody spoke sense except, possibly,

the tradesmen, women, and children. The others were so many pedants

exaggerated from the breed that Swift had detested in his earliest

satires. The Academy of Lagado was a Bedlam of Science, where men wore

out their lives trying to extract sunbeams from cucumbers, to build

houses downward from the roofs in the fashion of the bees and spiders,

to plow fields only with the snouts of hogs, to make silk from spider

webs, to cure colic with a pair of bellows, to soften marble for

pincushions, to propagate naked sheep, to write books by a mechanical

device, to discover painless methods of taxation.

Gulliver grew dizzy. He lacked the head, as Swift did, for this

whirling universe. It did not steady him when, on the neighbouring

island of Glubbdubdrib, he was allowed to call up the spirits of the

famous dead and found how falsely they had been presented in history.

It did not steady him when in Luggnagg he learned of the immortal

struldbrugs, for whom immortality was only human life prolonged to

an infinity of horrible old age. “I ... thought,” said Gulliver, for

Swift, “that no tyrant could invent a death into which I would not run

with pleasure from such a life.” When he was out of the mad lands of

Laputa, Balnibarbi, Glubbdubdrib, and Luggnagg, he was nearly upside

down, giddy, and three times as far from mankind.

Now for the antipodes of misanthropy. Among the Houyhnhnms Gulliver

was almost undisguisedly Swift. The day on which Gulliver set sail

from Portsmouth was the precise day of September 1710 on which Swift

had arrived in London to make his fortune with the new men in power.

Gulliver’s discovery of an island where the horses were as much wiser

and nobler as they were stronger than the men was such a discovery as

Swift may have made as he rode through desolate, beggarly Ireland.

It is easy to guess, though only to guess, that the device came to his

mind on that dark expedition to the south in the summer of 1723 after

Vanessa’s death. Everywhere he saw the “savage old Irish,” “miserable,

tattered, half-starved creatures, scarce in human shape,” living “in

the utmost ignorance, barbarity, and poverty, giving themselves wholly

up to idleness, nastiness, and thievery,” “brought up to steal or beg

for want of work,” so that to them “death would be the best thing to

be wished for both on account of themselves and the public.” Swift had

not yet reached the point where he could take up the cause of these

miserable victims. He felt chiefly a sick repulsion. He would not admit

that they and he were of the same kind. At least they must belong to a

tribe which had degenerated till they were less than beasts.

Less than beasts? Compare them with his horse, healthy, patient,

without follies or vices, incapable of pride. Horses, the animals Swift

had most to do with and knew best, were more fit to rule than degraded

men. Suppose some traveller should find a country where the horses did

rule. Suppose Gulliver were to find it. The Scriblerus Club had not

decided what race Martin was to visit on his fourth voyage, only that

he was to “display a vein of melancholy proceeding almost to a disgust

of his species.” Nothing could disgust a traveller, even wholesome

Gulliver, more than to study the horrid antics of a debased human

tribe in the company of utopian horses who could see little difference

between him and those apish copies. Gulliver had been disgusted among

the giants when the maids of honour laid him against their terrible

breasts. That had been only a shrinking of his senses. Now his soul

itself must shrink with an absolute antipathy from which he could not

recover. When he came back he would prefer the horses of England to the

men.

With something like these gathering plans, though they must be guessed

at, in something like this mood, which is certain enough, Swift rode

through the south and west. In September he was in Dublin again. By the

next January he had “left the Country of Horses.”

On his icy, fiery travels among the Houyhnhnms Swift (why call him

Gulliver?) did not bother to observe such stinging likenesses to

particular English persons and episodes as he observed among the

pigmies and the philosophers. The last of his adventures was the

simplest, as it was the most deadly. All actual fantasy, all apparent

fact.

He came upon his first Yahoos without realizing that they were inferior

men and upon his first Houyhnhnms without realizing that they were

superior horses. When he found himself taken for a Yahoo he hurried

to tell his Houyhnhnm master about Europe. He told him of wars, their

causes, means, and ends; of litigation and the arts of lawyers; of

money, and of poverty and riches; of luxury and dissipation; of

diseases and their remedies; of ministers of state and noblemen. The

reasonable Houyhnhnm said he had noticed the rudiments of all these

human ways of life among the Yahoos.

They had their tribal and civil wars. They hoarded shining stones

which they could not use, fought over them, and sometimes lost them

to bystanders who snatched them away as expertly as any lawyer. They

gorged themselves with food and sucked a root that made them drunk.

They had the only diseases in the country, because of their gluttony

and filth. They had in most herds a sort of ruling Yahoo, always

deformed in body and mischievous in disposition, who continued in

office till a worse could be found. They were lewd and promiscuous.

They were invariably dirty and sometimes splenetic. They had, it

appeared, all the human vices except unnatural appetites, these

“politer pleasures” not having occurred to them. They were unteachable

because they were perverse and restive, but they had the brains to be

cunning, malicious, treacherous, revengeful, insolent, abject, and

cruel. It was plain to the Houyhnhnm who talked with Swift that the

visitor was a Yahoo after all. That “small pittance of reason” which by

some accident had been given to the European Yahoos they used only to

multiply their natural corruptions and to acquire new ones not supplied

by nature.

To be fully reasonable was to be like the Houyhnhnms. They did not

know what lying was. They affirmed or denied only when they were

certain. Their two principal virtues were friendship and benevolence,

felt towards the whole species without partiality except where there

were special virtues to attract them. In marriage they were without

jealousy, fondness, quarrelling, or discontent. The young of both sexes

were brought up in moderation, industry, exercise, and cleanliness.

Their only government was an annual council of the entire nation. They

had no literature except poems composed, not written down, in praise

of virtue. They were skilful workmen in the necessary arts, but wasted

no time on superfluity or show. Reasonably born and bred, they lived

reasonably without passions and died reasonably without sickness or

fear.

“At first, indeed, I did not feel that natural awe which the Yahoos and

all other animals bear towards them; but it grew upon me by degrees,

much sooner than I imagined, and was mingled with a respectful love and

gratitude that they would condescend to distinguish me from the rest of

my species. When I thought of my family, my friends, my countrymen, or

human race in general, I considered them as they really were, Yahoos in

shape and disposition.” Swift would have remained with the Houyhnhnms

for ever if they had not sent him away. The beasts could not tolerate

a man. Nor could a man who had lived among the beasts ever again live

among men without disgust.

Swift(#78641) · 第 10 / 16 段