ACT V.

The resuscitation of dying persons is founded on a knowledge of the

subjects which have engaged our attention; for where the failure of the

circulation or respiration depends on causes which are not necessarily

permanent, temporary assistance may restore life. The use of stimulants

and opiates, in cases of loss of blood, are the means of renewing the

action of the heart when it has already nearly ceased to beat.

The transfusion of blood is also sometimes resorted to. The late Mr.

Ingleby, of Birmingham, in his work on Hæmorrhage[25], mentions an

instance in which he employed it with advantage in the case of a woman

who had just been confined. All the usual means had been tried, and

the patient did not rally. She was “in a constant state of jactitation,

with a dewy sweat and pinched features.” The respiration was difficult,

“with the sound of air passing through the mucus.”

The patient became cold and insensible. With the assistance of two

other medical gentlemen, with whom he advised, Mr. Ingleby proceeded

to inject some blood into her veins which he had obtained from the arm

of her husband. In less than five minutes, a perceptible improvement

arose, which was confirmed in about an hour. This operation is not,

however, always so fortunate, and is liable to some serious objections.

We require, no doubt, more experience on the subject; but, in the mean

time, it is one of considerable interest. Mr. Ingleby remarks, at the

conclusion of his case, that the scriptural expression applied by Adam

to Eve--“bone of my bone, and flesh of my flesh,”--seems in this case,

to have been literally applicable.

It is, however, in cases where the respiration is suspended by the

narcotic poisons that the most marked advantages may be seen from

artificial aid. I shall relate a case with which I was much interested

and surprised, and though a considerable time has now elapsed since it

occurred, I feel no diminution of the astonishment I first experienced.

A young woman of the name of Caroline Mercy was brought into the

Infirmary at Manchester, on the 16th of June, 1849, at half past

three, P.M. She had taken opium with a view to destroy herself, and

was in a complete state of insensibility. It was impossible, by

pulling the hair or pinching the skin, to excite any wincing or signs

of uneasiness; nor was any effect produced by the sudden affusion of

cold water. The pupils were contracted in an extreme degree; and the

countenance presented that peculiar vacancy, or want of expression,

which is so characteristic of the influence of opium. The breathing

was very considerably embarrassed, the inspirations and expirations

being separated by an unusually long interval, and accompanied by a

slight rattle. The extremities were warm. As soon as she was put to

bed, Mr. Gaskell, the resident medical officer, introduced the stomach

pump, with which he injected and withdrew about a gallon of cold

water; but towards the end of the operation, as the breathing became

laborious, the rattle louder, and the surface assumed a more livid

appearance, he thought it prudent to desist. He accordingly introduced

into the stomach a solution of ammonia, afterwards removing with the

pump as much as could be conveniently withdrawn. Large sinapisms were

then placed down the back, but she appeared, notwithstanding, to get

gradually worse; the respiration became more difficult, the lividity

greater, and the pulse less full, and slightly irregular.

Boiling water was now applied to the feet and legs, which had the

effect for a time of increasing both the power and frequency of the

respirations; but the benefit was only of a very transitory kind. At

about a quarter past five, Mr. Gaskell thought it desirable to assist

the respiration by artificial means, and he accordingly proceeded to

adopt the following expedient. He placed a large pitch plaster on

the abdomen, and, by this means maintaining his hold, endeavoured to

solicit the usual respiratory movements. This did not, however, give

him so much assistance as he had expected, and he was, therefore,

induced to abandon it after a short trial. He then placed a similar

plaster on each side of the chest, by which he was able to command

a more decisive effect: he thus, with the assistance of the man

nurse, alternately raised and depressed the ribs in imitation of the

breathing. This plan was productive of some amendment; the lividity

diminished, and the natural muscular efforts were more frequent and

apparent; the assistance was adapted as carefully as possible to the

indications of nature.

In addition to these means, boiling water was occasionally applied

to the arms and legs. At about five o’clock I came to Mr. Gaskell’s

assistance. At this period the temperature of the body had become

considerably reduced; and I remember the patient’s appearance was

exactly that of a dying woman; and I believe it was the impression both

of Mr. Gaskell and myself that our patient could not survive long.

The lips were of a livid colour, the expression of the countenance

altogether cadaverous, and the rattle in the throat had become

exceedingly loud. Boiling water poured on the legs did not now excite

the slightest movement, so that we were almost disposed to regard the

case as hopeless. The circumstance, however, that whilst the exertions

lasted, they had evidently been productive of advantage, did not suffer

us to abandon further trial. We now laid aside the plasters, and taking

hold of the margins of the ribs, endeavoured to support the respiration

with our hands alone. Standing on each side of the bed, with our

faces towards the feet of the patient, and our fingers curved round

the cartilages of the ribs, we could easily enlarge the capacity of

the chest, by approximating the ribs at the same time that they were

elevated; while, in expiration, the reverse movement could as easily

be accomplished. By a steady continuance of these efforts, we had the

pleasure of seeing a gradual improvement in our patient; and towards

six o’clock, the pulse had acquired the hard jerk which is commonly

felt when the system is under the influence of opium. Shortly after

six, indications of returning sensation were evinced by occasional

spasmodic quiverings of the muscles of the chest and abdomen. These

spasmodic movements resembled the actions which usually denote

approaching dissolution, with this essential difference, however, that

they became more frequent and prolonged at each time that they were

renewed. A little before seven o’clock she raised her eyelids, and at

the same time her left arm was slightly elevated. By persisting in

artificial respiration, and using means to rouse sensibility, such as

forcibly striking the face and chest with a wet towel, and applying

ammonia to the nostrils, in about half an hour from this period the

state of stupor had in a great measure disappeared. Instead of lying

prostrate on the back, she now lay on her side, and was enabled to

breathe without assistance. We then caused her clothes to be put on,

and the vesicated parts being dressed, she was taken out of bed, and

compelled to walk about the room.

It is worthy of remark, that whenever from fatigue we had been led to

suspend our efforts to maintain the respiration, a degree of relapse

followed; the lips became more intensely livid, the pulsations of

the heart more feeble and irregular, and the respirations fewer, and

accompanied with a louder rattle. On again resuming operations, the

converse was also noticed. When the amendment became decided, and the

sensibility returned, the rattle disappeared altogether; and this

took place without any expectoration, notwithstanding it was natural

to suppose that a considerable quantity of mucus was contained in the

air passages. The woman was fortunately a favourable subject for our

manipulations, as the abdominal parietes were sufficiently lax to admit

the easy prehension of the chest. As far as it could be done, we always

waited for the natural indications of the act of respiration, and paid

great attention to regulate our movements in correspondence with each

other. At the conclusion, the cartilages of the ribs were slightly

everted, and the cuticle removed in places by the unavoidable chafing

of the hands.

_June 17._--It was found that she had been kept out of bed all night,

which scarcely appeared necessary, and was, indeed, contrary to

instructions. She had vomited through the night, and complained of

shooting pains in the head. The pupils were less contracted; the pulse

was not ascertained, owing to the vesicated condition of the arms.

For several nights after this period she was troubled with a

starting in her sleep, which, however, was gradually removed by the

administration of twenty drops of laudanum every night at bed time. She

also suffered a good deal from the condition of her legs, which were

severely scalded, especially on the posterior part, where they had been

in contact with the hot water which had fallen on the bed. On the 27th

of August she left the hospital, cured.

After this account, which I have purposely given at length, as it

illustrates the subject in a remarkable manner, it is natural to wish

to know the previous circumstances of her case. The woman’s husband,

who was a master plumber, failed about four years before her admission.

Since that time he had lived irregularly, a circumstance which caused

her to be much distressed and dejected in spirits.

Two years after this failure she left her husband to reside with her

mother, but was persuaded again to live with her husband, who had

promised an amendment, which, it seems, he did not keep; she again

became low spirited, pawned her clothes, and was ashamed to return to

her mother.

On Sunday, the 16th of June, she sat down to dinner at one o’clock,

when, after a quarrel, she left the house, and purchased sixpennyworth

of laudanum at four different shops: she said she obtained about a

dessert spoonful for a penny, and drank it as she purchased it. She

then went to a neighbour’s house, and can only recollect feeling heavy,

and that she had brandy given her.[26]

When death is anticipated, there is a common curiosity to know the

period at which it will take place. But from what has been just said,

it will be evident that it is not always possible to predict the

precise time, nor are the symptoms which indicate its approach always

to be relied on. When the evidences of dissolution, however, begin

to manifest themselves, a general failure of the temperature, with a

cold dew on the skin, may generally be considered as indicative that

the scene is about to close. In many cases it is easy to recognise the

fatal turn which diseases take by the alterations which the symptoms

undergo. Where internal inflammations are about to issue in death,

there is mostly a striking change in the expression of the face, and

sometimes a curious shrinking of the body.

I shall never forget one instance in which these signs were

particularly manifest. A young woman, who had formerly been a servant

in Manchester, became ill, was unable to continue in service, and was

eventually removed to the Infirmary. One day, as I went to visit her as

usual, I observed a complete alteration in her countenance. It seemed

_shrunk and diminutive_, with a ghastly paleness. She put out her hand

and said, “You seem as if you did not know me.”--She spoke in a changed

voice.

She complained of no pain, but I remarked a trembling in her hands,

like that of the shaking palsy. The mind was perfectly collected, but

her usual features seemed only mimicked by their pale shrunk copy. She

said she knew that she was going to die,--and so it proved.

The nose and lips are very characteristic in the dying. The lips

become pale, the nostrils dilated and dark looking, and the hairs about

the lips seem more than usually apparent; the teeth look like pieces of

ordinary bone, and the eyes seem to shadow through the eyelids, or are

partially turned under the lids; the nails look dark, and the ends of

the fingers sodden.

Finally, convulsive twitchings often show themselves in the face, with

singular elevations of the eyebrows, and staring of the eyes. A gaping

attempt to breathe terminates the struggle.

When coma is present, a mucous rattle is generally of fatal import;

and, _è contrario_, when the lungs are affected, the supervention of

coma is equally to be dreaded.

When fluids taken by the patient flow back from his mouth, or fall

heavily down his throat as if poured into an ordinary tube, death is

soon to be expected.

In young children, a curious playing with the bed-clothes often attends

fatal affections of the brain. I remember a little child, who had

her handkerchief in her hand, which she spread out repeatedly with

apparent care, and in a fantastic manner, that would have been amusing

but for its fatal import. The picking of bed-clothes and catching of

the hands, as if at imaginary objects, are well known as terrible

indications.

Chomel remarks, as of serious presage, the automatic manner in which

a patient will unceasingly draw his hand to his side, in spite of the

efforts of the physician to ascertain his pulse. I might enlarge much

on such points, but it would, perhaps, be “to consider too curiously to

consider so.”

The signs of death are not, however, always very marked; for when

death arises in advanced and feeble age, the vital powers are so

easily depressed, and the heart’s action brought to a stand in so

imperceptible a manner, that it is common to speak of it as a quiet

sleep. Madame D’Arblay, writing to her husband, graphically describes

the death of her revered father, Dr. Burney, the celebrated author of

the History of Music.

“An awful stillness pervaded his apartment; and so soft became his

breathing, that I dropped my head by the side of his pillow, to be sure

that he breathed at all. There, anxiously, I remained, and such was

my position, when his faithful man-servant, George, after watchfully

looking at him from the foot of his bed, suddenly burst out into an

audible sob, crying out, ‘My master! My dear master!’

“For a moment, however, only; an alarm from his outcry had been raised,

and the servants, full of sorrow, hurried into the chamber, which

none of the family, that could assemble, ever quitted, and a general

lamentation broke forth.

“Yet could I not believe that all had ceased thus suddenly, without a

movement, without even a sigh! and, conjuring that no one would speak

or interfere, I solemnly and steadily persisted in passing a full hour

or more in listening to catch again a breath I could so reluctantly

lose; but all of life, of earthly life, was gone for ever; and here,

_mon ami_, I drop the curtain.”[27]

So frequently as medical men are called upon to contemplate the last

hours of human existence, it is to be regretted that they have not more

often given to their fellow men the reflections into which they must

naturally have been led. It cannot but be, that many accomplished minds

are to be found in a profession which is so enlightened; and it is not

then easy to assign any sufficient reason for this silence. Possibly

a kind of false delicacy may have operated on some minds, and others

may have been diverted from such thoughts by the pressure of active

occupation. It is common to suppose that medical men are blunted in

their feelings by the nature of their avocations. It may be that there

is some foundation for such an opinion; but I think the apparent want

of sympathy sometimes found, is more frequently the effect of a strong

temporary direction of the mind to the contemplation of curative means.

Yet it must be owned that habit does much to lessen that exquisite

sensibility with which we instinctively regard the chamber of death.

The anatomist, as he traces with curious scalpel the secret structure

of the frame, loses in professional technicalities the awful truth that

he contemplates his own likeness. The hoary-headed gravedigger, as he

turns up the mould to receive his fellow man, thinks not how soon the

sand will rattle on his own coffin, and his humble name “shine upon

the plate.” This indifference is, to some extent, good and necessary;

but it is sadly too common and too great. But yet to the medical man,

above all others, there is something of terrible reality in death.

The student pictures death in his own manner: he looks upon it as the

distant prospect which is to surround him at the remotest period of his

life, the haven and resting place of his toil, the slumber and quiet

repose which is to terminate the harvest of his day. The father tells

his children of a peaceful and a better country, and smooths the pillow

of his sick child as he whispers words of consolation and affection.

The medical man has fresh in his mind, with all its ghastly reality,

the cold image of his once dear friend; he yet hears the choking rattle

in his throat, and yet wipes in imagination the perspiration from his

corpse-like brow.

To what result then shall we come after the contemplation of death?--to

the greatest and the best: the daylight of life is still around us,

but the gloom of that night, in which no man can work, will soon be

foreshadowed by sickness, infirmity, and age. Before this night steals

upon us, and our ability for useful exertion ceases in the thickening

obscurity, let us remember the reality of these things,--and, as we

write our characters in the indelible language of deeds that can never

be changed, let us remember, also, how soon the story will be told, and

the book closed for ever.

It is, indeed, a mortifying thing to think what a laborious preparation

we make for a few years of existence. It is humiliating to look back to

the cares of infancy--the nights of maternal watching and anxiety--the

hopes of childhood--the dreary toils and frequent tasks of school

life--the ambition of riper years, with its unceasing efforts to

attain what we find at last to be vanity and vexation. For what do we

prepare,--if gold and silver at last tire the eye--if the applause

of the world is found empty and interested--if ambition estranges

friendship--if wealth cools our best affections, and separates man from

his fellow man? For what do we prepare whilst the grave is so near to

all of us, and the feet of those who are to carry us out are already

lingering at the threshold of our doors?

But who is there that timely thinks on these things? Who can imagine

his own death--anticipate the time when he shall be the object

of fearful regard in others--when he himself shall be the almost

unconscious being struggling with the thickening breath, and gasping

with the convulsive throes of death? Who can think of the world being

without himself; of the things which he has called his own being

entirely at the disposal of others? To realise such ideas is to catch

a glimpse of the true value of present interests. What then think we

of the approbation of the great--the vanity of fashion, the pride

of learning and the dignity of title;--the remembrance of one kind

feeling, one charitable action, one generous sentiment and loving

emotion, is more grateful to the heart, and more satisfying to the

understanding. We are all too ready to avoid the contemplation of

death. The subject is not an agreeable one, and can seldom find a

fitting place in our consideration. It is too soon, and we would put it

off “till a more convenient season.” But if we may not consider our own

end, have we no one dear and precious to us in whose life our interests

are intimately and affectionately entwined!--How shall we stand on

the grave-side of such precious one, and with what thoughts shall we

hereafter turn from the little circle of our mourning friends to the

fresh landscape which surrounds the tomb?

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Byron’s Vision of Judgment.

[2] Art. Inhumations precipitées: Dict. de Médecine et de Chirurgie.

[3] Medical Jurisprudence, p. 5.

[4] For the suggestion of these apt quotations, I am indebted to

Paris’s Med. Jurisprudence.

[5] Sommer observed, that, contrary to the statement of Nysten, the

body became rigid before it was completely cold.

[6] According to Sommer, seldom if ever later.

[7] See Guy’s Hospital Reports, p. 388. vol. vii. 1851, Remarks on

Strangulation.

[8] See Alison’s Pathology.

[9] Belloc, Cours de Médicine Légale, p. 318.

[10] Medical Jurisprudence, p. 492. Edit. for 1838.

[11] Traité des Signes de la Mort, et des Moyens de prévenir les

Enterrements prématurés. Par E. Bouchut, Paris, chez J. B. Baillière,

1849.

[12] See Sir H. Halford’s Essays.

[13] Influence of Disease on the Mind, Essays and Orations, p. 83.

[14] Hans Christian Andersen’s Story of My Life, translated by Mary

Howitt, p. 114.

[15] Arnold’s Life, vol. ii. p. 337.

[16] Latham’s Clinical Medicine, vol. ii. p. 388.

[17] Vide Watson’s Lectures.

[18] See Christison on Poisons.

[19] Knight’s London, vol. iv. p. 301.

[20] What is called _pressure_ on the brain is not necessary for the

production of _coma_.

[21] Vide Elliotson’s Lect. on the Practice of Physic.

[22] Vide O’Meara’s Residence at St. Helena, vol. i. p. 179.

[23] Op. Cit. vol. i. p. 192.

[24] Vide Cowper’s Life and Correspondence, by Southey, vol. i. p. 130.

[25] Ingleby on Uterine Hæmorrhage.

[26] See Lancet, for Oct. 1840. Case of recovery from the effects of

opium, by J. Bower Harrison.

[27] Memoirs of Dr. Burney, p. 432.

THE

HUMAN MIND

CONSIDERED IN SOME OF ITS MEDICAL

ASPECTS.

_Macbeth._ How does your patient, doctor?

_Doctor._ Not so sick, my lord,

As she is troubled with thickcoming fancies,

That keep her from her rest.

SHAKSPEARE.

THE HUMAN MIND, &c.[28]

There is nothing which is more common than to hear people speak of

possessing a knowledge of human nature. It is usual to signify by this

a mere acquaintance with the vices of mankind, which does, indeed,

form one part of such knowledge, but it is not all. What is called

a knowledge of human nature is said to be acquired only by mixing

with the world, which implies that a real intimacy with the workings,

tendencies, and capabilities of the human mind is industriously kept

back in our literature, and that by the general consent of mankind it

is deemed better that a great part of the world should be ignorant

of the true position of their fellow beings. Many of those who are

teachers of religion and morality, have certainly derived their ideas

on this subject from sources which show, in point of fact, a complete

ignorance of human nature, or, at least, the studious _disguisement_ of

such knowledge.

The reserve, which is common and proper in society, may screen from the

unreflecting, and those little conversant with life, much of the real

nature of the human mind.

The prescribed forms of living, of speaking and writing, and the

conventional usages of mankind, have given an artificial hue to our

actions and language, and thus the words of the great dramatist have

become literally true, that “all the world is a stage, and all the men

and women merely players.” The true character of the human mind in its

more intimate workings, is little confessed in our literature, and

little acknowledged in our laws. Unfortunately, the real appreciation

of the human mind (with regard to its actual state, and not its

abstract consideration) has scarcely appeared to fall within the

province either of the moralist or metaphysician, and has remained a

kind of neutral ground, uncultivated because unclaimed. That knowledge

which is sometimes designated a _knowledge of the world_, approaches,

perhaps, nearest to the subject in question, but is seldom possessed

by those who are either desirous or capable of systematizing their

information, and thus, much of what is really known of our common

nature is lost both to the philosopher and the philanthropist. In the

writings of some of our novelists, it is true, we find a considerable

amount of this species of information, but it is for the most part

rendered subservient only to the entertainment of the reader, and

not in every case calculated for his edification. The writings of

Fielding, Smollett, Cervantes, and Le Sage, with many others of more

modern date, amongst which I may mention those of Mr. Charles Dickens,

abound in judicious reflections on men and manners, and discover no

little penetration into character and mind. After all, however, there

is an evident deficiency in published or recognised information of this

kind; and hence the surprise or affected surprise with which it is

common to view what are called the _inconsistencies_ of human nature.

That certain infirmities of mind are not incompatible with genius, it

may be common to admit; but when we approach the subject closer, we

shall find the poetic temperament, more frequently than not, clouded

with insanity or touched with perversity. The same bright spirit which

rejoices in the sunshine of nature is not less sensitive of the gloom.

There is often a foreboding of evil, and often the imagination will

heighten the calamities which are really present, until a thousand

heart-rending associations grow up in the fertility of the mind.

The consideration of the human mind, then, in what may be called its

medical aspects, seems to me one which has not yet sufficiently engaged

the general attention of mankind; and I wish on the present occasion to

bring it before your notice, as a subject which is neither devoid of

interest, nor wanting in utility.

The effect of temperament may first claim our attention. I shall not,

however, confine myself to the divisions which strictly medical writers

have formed on this subject, reserving to myself the freedom of the

popular acceptation of the word.

The constitution of the body as to its bulk and general aspect, as

well seen in the countenance as in the conformation of other parts, is

known to be connected with accompanying peculiarities of mind which

are of every day observation. There is an asperity in the countenance

and figure of some people which immediately strikes us, and we feel a

sort of intuitive dislike. There are others whose open countenance and

portly bearing tell at once of generous feelings and easy dispositions.

Every one remembers the passage in the play of Julius Cæsar:--

“Would he were fatter; but I fear him not,--

Yet if my name were _liable_ to fear,

I do not know the man I should avoid

So soon as that _spare_ Cassius.”

The Sanguine Temperament, as the very name implies, is characterised by

a constitution in which the blood-vessels are predominant; the face is

red, and easily flushed, the complexion often light; the temper hasty,

the actions quick. Those who have this temperament in a marked form,

often act by impulse; they are restless, and have difficulty in waiting

for the result of their undertakings. The mind is often too easily

excited to allow of a proper operation of its workings; the ideas flow

too quickly, and in a little while become confused. Such persons, when

called upon in exciting circumstances, become embarrassed,--are what

they call nervous, and lose self-possession--or act to disadvantage.

The character of Peter in the sacred writings gives us a good example

of this sanguine temper: we find him saying to his Lord, “Though all

men shall be offended because of thee, yet I will never be offended;

I will lay down my life for thy sake:” and again; “though I die with

thee, yet will I not deny thee.” But, as in many other sanguine people,

the feeling wanted the support of a steady equanimity. When Jesus was

betrayed, and Peter found himself accused of being in his company, he

denied any knowledge of him; and when he found that he was known by his

accent, (“surely thou also art one of them, for thy speech betrayeth

thee,”) “he began to curse and to swear, saying, I know not the man.”

Such is often the fate of the warm protestations of sanguine people.

The emotion which attends the expression of their sentiments gives the

complexion to them whilst it exists, but it is not enduring, and is

succeeded by other emotions, which, for the time, overcome the better

feelings of the heart. This sanguine temperament gives what we call

the generous character; the warmth of temper which, in moderation,

we rather admire as heightening the affections, and giving joy and

gladness: but it has also its sorrows and its errors.--There is the

quick resentment and the passionate grief, and these are the dark

aspects which are full of tears and lamentation. Hamlet, you know, says

to Horatio:--

“Give me the man that is not passion’s slave,

And I will wear him in my heart’s core;

Aye, in my heart of hearts, as I do thee.”

In sanguine people, the train of thoughts appears to be much quicker

than in others. This is attended with certain advantages, but

corresponding disadvantages. Such minds are imaginative--what is called

ingenious. The associations are not too strong to forbid erratic

thoughts; relations are often readily perceived, but there is less

exactness. The memory is, perhaps, less retentive, and the speed of

the thoughts leads often to confusion. They crowd on one another until

indistinctness arises. This indistinctness is sometimes painful.

This kind of mind is what is called passionate; hence the term _hasty_,

which may be well used as indicative of a too rapid procession of

thoughts. The mind cannot well operate in this hurried state. The ideas

flash across, but they light up too fiercely a train of associations to

admit the suggestions of other minds.

The brain is, perhaps, over sensitive, and its powers too readily

exhausted, and too intense whilst in operation.

The Lymphatic Temperament is quite the reverse of the sanguine. Those

who have this temperament are not easily moved, or excited; the skin

is pale. Such persons are better calculated to undergo anxieties, or

meet the exigencies of sudden emergencies. The mind has not those

quick sympathies, or brilliant imaginings, which distinguish a warmer

temperament.

There is a steady, cool calculation, which is more adapted to worldly

prosperity; feelings less readily wounded, and less apt to betray

themselves in the excitement of life. Some possess this in a surprising

degree, and many assume it. Many cover a natural sensibility by the

forms and usages which polite life has invented, and studiously avoid

showing the natural burst of affection, or the bitter outpourings of

grief.

It is well, in some degree, that this should be done; but let not

nature be altogether destroyed, and all the fine sensibilities crushed,

under an artful and sophisticated mannerism.

There is a story told of a cockney, who visited the beautiful and

romantic scenery of the Alps, and being asked his impression of a

sublime prospect, which suddenly burst on his view, said, that he must

confess “_it was a well got up thing_.” This is the school of fashion,

which gives us two fingers to touch as a welcome, after the absence of

as many years.

In some, the operations of the mind are so slow that they seem

to stagnate, and pass into reverie. The extreme of this condition

lapses into a state of imbecility and fatuity; but a certain degree

of apathy has its advantages. The mind has time to act; there is no

overcrowding of ideas--no hurry of thought. There is more continuance

of application--less impatience of consideration. The _affections_

do not trouble the operations of the mind. There are not those quick

sympathies which have relations with every thing that passes.

There are some people, again, in whose constitution the nervous

system seems to have an unnatural preponderance; the mind seems to be

constantly in a restless state, and to wear out the body in a ceaseless

activity, or in the struggles of overweening ambition. Such characters

are ever pressing on in the competition of social life; often a prey

to cares and anxieties, which follow each other in a never-ending

succession. “_After life’s fitful fever_,” they indeed “_sleep well_.”

Hypochondriacal feelings are, no doubt, in a great measure, connected

with constitution or temperament. Melancholy is much more common than

is generally conceived, and may be, as I have already hinted, perhaps

in some degree inseparable from a mind which highly appreciates the

beautiful, has quick sympathies with all around, and a thoughtful

regard to the possibilities, and even probabilities of a changing

world. On this account it has always been considered by the poets as

a poetic feeling, and though this view may have attracted the sneers

of some, or the ridicule of others, there is a certain truth in the

opinion. Ben Jonson alludes to this notion, with respect to melancholy,

as an accompaniment of sensibility, in his “_Every Man in his Humour_.”

“_Stephen._ Ay, truly, sir, I am mightily given to melancholy.

“_Matthew._ Oh! it’s your only fine humour, sir; your true

melancholy breeds your perfect fine wit, sir. I am melancholy myself

divers times, sir; and then do I no more but take pen and paper

presently, and overflow your half a score or a dozen of sonnets at a

sitting.”--Act III., Scene 1.

Again:--

“_Ed. Knowall_.... What think you of this, coz?

“_Stephen._ Why, I do think of it; and I will be more proud and

melancholy and gentlemanlike than I have been, I’ll insure you.”--Act

I., Scene 2.

In Scott’s “Diary” (May, 1827,) he says:--“Imagination renders us the

victim of occasional low spirits. All belonging to this gifted, as

it is called, but often unhappy class, must have felt, but for the

dictates of religion, or the natural recoil of the mind from the idea

of dissolution, there have been times when they would have been willing

to throw away life, as a child does a broken toy. I am sure I know one

who has often felt so.”

A disposition to melancholy is by no means, as might at first be

imagined, necessarily indicated by a grave and staid deportment.

In a large proportion of instances, it is even coupled with an

exuberance of spirits, which would seem to promise a perpetual sunshine

of cheerfulness.

The mind, however, which is alive to joy, is also, and perhaps

equally, alive to sorrow; and often passes by quick transitions from

the one to the other.

Our great dramatist, in mingling the ludicrous with the tragic, has

evidently shown his acquaintance with this tendency of the human mind.

Byron has happily blended in some of his most successful passages the

sublime and the ridiculous, thereby greatly heightening the effect of

both. In his “_Corsair_,” however, he has directly touched upon this

peculiarity of the mind, where he says--

“Strange though it seem, yet with extremest grief

Is linked a mirth,--it doth not bring relief.

That playfulness of sorrow ne’er beguiles,

And smiles in bitterness,--but still it smiles.”

In Dr. Currie’s Life of Burns, allusion is made to the combination of

melancholy and gaiety in the character of that extraordinary poet.

Notwithstanding the gaiety of Burns’ writings, he was constitutionally

a melancholy man, and was subject “to those depressions of mind, which

are perhaps not wholly separable from the sensibility of genius, but

which, in him, arose to an uncommon degree.” ... “Such a disposition

is far from being at variance with social enjoyments. Those who

have studied the affinities of mind, know that a melancholy of this

description after a while seeks relief in the endearments of society,

and that it has no distant connexion with the flow of cheerfulness, or

even the extravagance of mirth.”[29]

In a letter from Sir Walter Scott to his daughter in-law, the following

mention is made of Matthews, the comedian. “I am glad you like my old

acquaintance, Matthews. Some day I will make him show his talent for

your amusement in private--for I know him well. It is very odd--he is

often subject to fits of deep melancholy.”[30]

From these cursory remarks on melancholy, I may proceed to speak of

some particular states of mind, which attend the same peculiarity of

temperament, and though not incompatible with mental sanity, are yet

to be considered as bordering upon derangement.

Some of the illustrations I shall bring forward are from works of

poetry, but may be considered, nevertheless, as expressive of actual

facts, because I have scrupulously avoided making use of them where the

subject had need of graver support; so that in effect they are rather

introduced to relieve and exemplify the matter, than to substantiate

it. The curious feelings to which I allude, exist in various degrees of

intensity in different people. They cannot be considered as common to

everybody, and are far more frequent or powerful in the imaginative and

eccentric, than in others. Yet I should conceive that they prevail to a

greater extent than is commonly supposed.

Amongst this class of feelings may be placed the disposition which is

sometimes manifested by those who stand on precipitous cliffs to cast

themselves down. This seems suggested by a kind of insane impulse,

which is dreaded by the very person who indulges it.

Scott beautifully alludes to such a feeling in “The Lady of the Lake.”

“There are, who have at midnight hour,

In slumber scaled a dizzy tower,

And on the verge that beetled o’er

The ocean tides incessant roar,

Dreamed calmly out their dangerous dream,

Till wakened by the morning beam;

When dazzled by the eastern glow,

Such startler cast his glance below,

And saw unmeasured depths around,

And heard unintermitted sound,

And thought the battled fence so frail,

It waved like cobweb in the gale;

Amid his senses giddy wheel

Did he not desperate impulse feel

Headlong to plunge himself below,

And meet the worst his fears foreshow?”

The medical aspects of death, and the medical aspects of the human mind · 第 3 / 4 章