Are these customs observed at the present day? This is an age of change.

We have used the present tense in the foregoing references, but it is in

the past tense that we read in Chambers's "Book of Days," that, "In the

North of England, the reapers were accustomed to leave a good handful of

grain uncut; they laid it down flat, and covered it over; when the field

was done, the bonniest lass was entrusted with the pleasing duty of

cutting the final handful, which was presently dressed up with various

sewings, tyings, and trimmings like a doll, and hailed as a Corn Baby or

Kirn Dolly. It was carried home in triumph with music of fiddles and

bagpipes, set up conspicuously at night during supper, and usually

preserved in the farmer's parlour for the remainder of the year. The fair

maiden who cut this handful of grain was called the Har'st Queen." A

similar custom prevailed, with local variations, in Shropshire,

Gloucestershire, Hertfordshire, Devonshire, and other parts of England. In

Lincolnshire, and some other counties, handbells were rung by those riding

on the last load, and the following rhyme sung:--

"The boughs do shake and the bells do ring,

So merrily comes in our harvest in,

Our harvest in, our harvest in!

Hurrah!"

Writers on local customs formerly observed in different parts of the

country, have preserved the memory of a curious one connected with the

last handful of wheat. In some parts the reapers threw their sickles at

the reserved handful, and he who succeeded in cutting it down shouted, "I

have her!" "What have you?" the others cried out. "A mare!" he replied.

"What will you do with her?" was then asked. "Send her to ----," naming

some neighbouring farmer whose harvest work was not completed. This rustic

pleasantry was called "crying the mare." The rejoicings attendant on the

bringing in of the last load of corn are thus described in the "Book of

Days":--"The waggon containing it was called the hock cart; it was

surmounted by a figure formed out of a sheaf, with gay dressings,

intended to represent the goddess Ceres. In front men played merry tunes

on the pipe and tabor, and the reapers tripped around in a hand-in-hand

ring, singing appropriate songs, or simply by shouts and cries giving vent

to the excitement of the day. In some districts they sang or shouted as

follows:--

"Harvest home, harvest home!

We ploughed, we have sowed,

We have reaped, we have moved,

We have brought home every load.

Hip, hip, hip, harvest home!"

In some parts the figure on the waggon, instead of an effigy, was the

prettiest of the girl-reapers, decked with summer flowers, and hailed as

the Harvest Queen. Bloomfield, in one of his Suffolk ballads, thus

preserves the memory of this custom:--

"Home came the jovial Hockey load,

Last of the whole year's crop;

And Grace among the green boughs rode,

Right plump upon the top."

These and many other harvest-home customs undoubtedly had their origin in

heathen times, in common with those associated with the New Year, the

Epiphany, May Day, and many other festivals.

Not the least important part of the harvest home observances was the

supper which closed them, and which took place in the kitchen of the

farmhouse or in the barn, the master and mistress presiding. The fare on

these occasions was substantial and plentiful, and good home-brewed ale

was poured out abundantly--we are afraid too much so. The harvest home

supper of the sixteenth century, as graphically portrayed by Herrick,

included:--

"Foundation of your feast, fat beef,

With upper stories, mutton, veal,

And bacon, which makes full the meal;

With several dishes standing by,

As here a custard, there a pie,

And here all-tempting frumentie.

And for to make the merry cheer,

If smirking wine be wanting here,

There's that which drowns all care, stout beer."

Instead of a formal vote of thanks to the givers of the feast, the

prevailing feeling was expressed in a song, one version of which runs as

follows:--

"Here's health to our master,

The load of the feast;

God bless his endeavours,

And send him increase.

May prosper his crops, boys,

And we reap next year;

Here's our master's good health, boys,

Come, drink off your beer!

Now harvest is ended,

And supper is past;

Here's to our mistress's health, boys,

Come, drink a full glass.

For she's a good woman,

Provides us good cheer;

Here's our mistress's good health, boys.

Come, drink off your beer!"

Over the greater part of England a harvest-thanksgivings service has, at

the present day, taken the place of the festive observances of former

times. It would be useless to regret the passing away of the old customs,

even if there was much more reason for such a feeling; for change is an

inevitable condition of existence, and we can no more recall the old

things which have passed away than we can replace last year's snow on the

wolds. Even the harvest-thanksgiving service, with its accompanying cereal

and horticultural decorations of church and chapel, seems destined to a

change. The decorations are too often overdone. We have seen in some

churches piles of fruit and vegetables that would furnish a shop, in

addition to sheaves of corn and stacks of quartern loaves. In some

instances, a more deplorable display has been made in the shape of a

model of a farmyard, thus turning the place of worship into a show.

Sometimes, too, the sermon has no reference to the harvest. Sometimes,

again, the service is held before the harvest has been gathered in; or

thanks are offered for an abundant harvest when it has notoriously been

deficient. Perhaps the need of a collection at this particular time may

account for these discrepancies. Such mistakes are easily avoided,

however, and no fault can reasonably be found with these celebrations when

religious zeal is kept within the bounds of discretion.

Curious Charities.

We obtain some interesting side-lights on the condition of the people in

the past from old-time charities. Several of the prison charities founded

in bygone times are extremely quaint and full of historic interest. One

Frances Thornhill appears to have had a desire to make the prison beds

comfortable. She left the sum of L30 for the Corporation of the city of

York to provide straw for the beds of the prisoners confined in York

Castle. The local authorities in these later years appear to have received

the interest on the capital without carrying out the conditions of the

charity.

Bequests of fuel suggest to the mind the time when persons not only

suffered from imprisonment but also from cold. At Bury St. Edmund's, L10

was left by Margaret Odiam for a minister to say mass to the inmates of

the jail, and for providing faggots to warm the long ward in which the

poor prisoners were lodged. In 1787, Elizabeth Dean, of Reading, left L156

17s. 5d., the interest of which she directed to be spent in buying

firewood for the county jail.

At Norwich, a worthy man named John Norris left Consols to the value of

L300 for buying beef and books for the felons confined in the jail. The

prison food is now regulated by law and the charity beef is banished, but

we believe the interest is spent in supplying the prisoners with

literature. Even as late as 1821, John Hall left Consols to the value of

L127 16s. for providing a Christmas dinner of the good old English fare of

roast beef and plum pudding for the criminals in the Northampton county

prison. In 1556, Thomas Cattell left a rent charge of L35 a year for

buying beef and oatmeal for the poor prisoners of Newgate and other London

prisons.

A singular bequest was made in the year 1556, by Griffith Ameridith, of

Exeter, and it amounted to L524 4s. 11d. in Consols, "for providing

shrouds for prisoners executed at Kingswell, and for the maintenance of a

wall round the burial ground." "But," says a writer on this theme,

"probably for want of subjects for shrouds, the income is now, without any

authority, applied to a distribution of serge petticoats to old women."

One advantage of the change is that the new recipients can at least

express their gratitude. In the olden time it was by no means an uncommon

practice for criminals about to be executed to proceed to the gallows in

shrouds. On July 30th, 1766, two men were hanged at Nottingham for

robbery. "On the morning of their execution," says a local record, "they

were taken to St. Mary's Church, where they heard 'the condemned sermon,'

and then to their graves, in which they were permitted to lie down to see

if they would fit. They walked to the place of execution in their

shrouds." At an execution in the same town in 1784, we read in a local

newspaper report that the unfortunate men were attired in their shrouds.

To add to the impressiveness of the condemned sermon, the coffins in which

the condemned criminals were to be buried, were exhibited during the

service.

Charities and collections in churches were formerly very common in this

country for freeing British subjects from slavery in foreign lands. In

1655, Alicia, Duchess of Dudley, by a deed poll, directed L100 per annum

to be drawn from the rents of certain lands situated in the parish of

Bidford, Warwickshire, for redeeming poor English Christian slaves or

captives from the Turks. Thomas Betson, of Hoxton Square, London, by will

dated 15th February, 1723, left a considerable fortune for the redemption

of British slaves in Turkey and Barbary. He died in 1725, and five years

later the property was estimated to be worth about L22,000, and the

interest on half the amount was to be devoted to ransoming his countrymen

from slavery. In the year 1734, it is stated that 135 men were freed by

this charity. Between the years 1734 and 1826, the large sum of L21,088

8s. 2-1/2d. was expended in the admirable cause of freeing the captive.

Many of the old church books contain entries respecting collections for

this object. In the books of Holy Cross, Westgate, Canterbury, is a long

list of the names of persons in the parish in March, 1670, contributing

L02 07s. 04d., for "Redeeming the Captives in Turkye."

Sir John Gayer, was in his time a leading London merchant, an Alderman for

the ward of Aldgate, and a popular Lord Mayor. He lived in the reigns of

James I. and Charles I., and was a man of great enterprise, ready to

encounter perils in foreign lands to forward his commercial projects. On

one memorable occasion he was travelling with a caravan of merchants

across the desert of Arabia, and by some accidental means managed to

separate himself from his friends, and at night-fall was alone. His

position was one of great peril: he heard the roaring of wild animals, but

failed to find any place of refuge. We gather from the story of his life

that:--"He knelt down and prayed fervently, and devoutly promised, that if

God would rescue him from his impending danger the whole produce of his

merchandise should be given as an offering in benefactions to the poor, on

his return to his native country. At this extremity a lion of an unusually

large size was approaching him. Death appeared inevitable, but the prayer

of the good man had ascended to heaven, and he was delivered. The lion

came up close to him. After prowling round him, smelling him, bristling

his shaggy hair, and eyeing him fiercely, he stopped short, turned round,

and trotted quietly away, without doing the slightest injury. It is said

that Sir John Gayer remained in the same suppliant posture till the

morning dawned, when he pursued his journey, and happily came up with his

friends, who had given up all hope of again seeing him." The journey was

concluded without further misadventure, a ready market found for the

goods, and old England reached in safety with increased wealth. Sir John

did not forget his vow, and many were the deeds of charity he performed,

more especially to the poor of his own parish of St. Katharine Cree. One

of bequests amounting to L200 was left to the needy of that parish on

condition that a "sermon should be occasionally preached in the church to

commemorate his deliverance from the jaws of the lion." The sermon is

known as the "Lion Sermon."

In the church of St. Katharine Cree within the altar rails is a carved

head of Gayer. On the right hand side is a text, as follows:--"The eyes of

the Lord are over the righteous, and his ears are open unto their

prayers--Ps. 34, v. 15;" on the left hand side this text appears:--"The

effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much--James V.,

xvi.;" and under the figure this motto:--"Super Astra Spero." There is a

brass bearing the following inscription:--

In Memory of

SIR JOHN GAYER, KNT.,

Founder of the "Lion Sermon" who was descended from

the Old West Country Family of Gayer,

and was born at Plymouth,

and became Sheriff of this City of London in 1635,

and Lord Mayor of London in 1647.

He was a member of the Levant or Turkey Company, and of the Worshipful

Company of Fishmongers, London, and President of Christ's Hospital,

London, and a liberal donor to and pious founder of Charities.

This City has especial reason to be proud of him, for rather than

withdraw his unflinching assertion of the Native Liberties of the

Citizens, and his steadfast support of King Charles I., he submitted

to imprisonment in the Tower at the hands of the Parliament in 1647

and 1648, and his "Salva Libertate" became historical.

He resided in this Parish, and "Dyed in peace in his owne house" on

the 20th of July 1649, and he now lies buried in a Vault beneath this

Church of St. Katharine Cree, Leadenhall St.

This Memorial Brass was subscribed for by Members of and Descendants

from the Family of Gayer, and was placed here by them in testimony of

their admiration for and appreciation of the noble character and many

virtues of their illustrious ancestor.

The work of organising this Memorial was carried out by

Edmund Richard Gayer, M.A. of Lincoln's Inn, Esq., Barrister at Law,

1888.

There are a number of ancient bequests for ringing bells and lighting

beacons to guide travellers by night. These were very useful charities,

for in the days of old, lands were generally unenclosed, and the roads

poorly constructed. It was difficult for the wayfarer to find his way when

the nights were dark. At the ancient village of Hessle, near Hull, a bell

is still rung every night except Sunday, at 7 o'clock. Long, long ago, so

runs the local story, a lady was lost on a dark night near the place, and

was in sore distress, fearing that she would have to wander about in the

cold until daylight. Happily, the ringing of the Hessle bells enabled her

to direct her course to the village in safety, although she had to wend

her weary steps over a trackless country. In gratitude for her delivery

she left a piece of land to the parish clerk, on condition that he rang

every evening one of the church bells.

A similar story is related respecting a Barton-on-Humber bell ringing

custom. Richard Palmer left in 1664 a bequest to the sexton of Workingham,

Berkshire, for ringing a bell every evening at eight, and every morning at

four o'clock. One reason for ringing this, was "that strangers and others

who should happen, on winter nights, within hearing of the ringing of the

said bell, to lose their way in the country, might be informed of the time

of the night, and receive some guidance into the right way."

John Wardall, in his will dated 29th August, 1656, provided for a payment

of L4 per annum being made to the Churchwardens of St. Botolph's,

Billingsgate, London, "to provide a good and sufficient iron and glass

lanthorn, with a candle, for the direction of passengers to go with more

security to and from the water-side, all night long, to be fixed at the

north-east corner of the parish church, from the feast-day of St.

Bartholomew to Lady-Day; out of which sum L1 was to be paid to the sexton

for taking care of the lanthorn." In 1662 a man named John Cooke made a

similar bequest for providing a lamp at the corner of St. Michael's Lane,

next Thames Street.

In past ages churches were frequently unpaved and the floor usually

covered with rushes. Not a few persons have left money and land for

providing rushes for churches. In these latter days rushes are no longer

strewn on the floor for keeping the feet warm in cold weather, but at a

number of places old rights are maintained by the carrying out of the

custom. At Clee, Lincolnshire, for example, the parish officials possess

the right of cutting rushes from a certain piece of land for strewing the

floor of the church every Trinity Sunday. The churchwardens preserve their

rights by cutting a small quantity of grass annually and strewing it on

the church floor. At Old Weston, Huntingdonshire, a similar custom still

lingers. "A piece of land," says Edwards in his "Remarkable Charities,"

"belongs, by custom, to the parish clerk for the time being, subject to

the condition of the land being mown immediately before Weston feast,

which occurs in July, and the cutting thereof strewed on the church floor,

previous to divine service on the feast Sunday, and continuing there

during divine service." At Pavenham, Bedfordshire, the church is annually

strewn with grass cut from a certain field, on the first Sunday after the

11th July. "Until recently," says a well-informed correspondent, "the

custom was for the churchwardens to claim the right of removing from the

field in question as much grass as they could 'cut and cart away from

sunrise to sunset.' A few years ago this arrangement was altered into a

yearly payment on the part of the tenant of the field of one guinea." The

money is spent in purchasing grass for spreading on the church floor. The

parishioners have always taken a deep interest in this old custom. On the

benefaction table of Deptford Church is recorded that "a person unknown

gave half-a-quarter of wheat, to be given in bread on Good Friday, and

half a load of rushes at Whitsuntide, and a load of pea-straw at

Christmas yearly, for the use of the church." In 1721, an offer of 21s.

per annum was accepted in lieu of the straw and rushes, and in 1744, the

sum of 10s. yearly in place of the half-quarter of wheat.

John Rudge, by his will dated 17th April, 1725, left a pound a year to a

poor man to go round the parish church of Trysull, Staffordshire, during

the delivery of the sermon, to keep people awake and drive out of the

church any dogs which might come in. Richard Brooke left 5s. a year for a

person to keep quiet during divine service the boys in the Wolverhampton

church and churchyard.

At Stockton-in-the-Forest, Yorkshire, is a piece of land called "Petticoat

Hole," and it is held on the condition of providing a poor woman of the

place every year with a new petticoat.

We will close this chapter with particulars of a novel mode of

distributing a charity. At Bulkeley, Cheshire, a charity of 19s. 2d. was

given to the poor as follows. The overseer obtained the amount in coppers,

placed them in a peck measure, and invited each of the poor folks to help

himself or herself to a handful.

An Old-Time Chronicler.

We have frequently referred to the writings of John Stow in this work, and

we think a short account of his life and labours will prove interesting to

our readers.

From the ranks of tailors have sprung many famous men. Not one more

worthy, perhaps, than honest John Stow, the painstaking compiler of works

which have found a lasting place in historic literature.

Stow was a Londoner of Londoners, born in 1525, in the parish of St.

Michael, Cornhill. His father and grandfather were citizens, and appear to

have been most worthy men. John Stow was trained under his father to the

trade of a tailor. At an early age he took an interest in the study of

history and antiquities, and, as years ran their course, his love of

research increased. We have had handed down to us from the pen of Edmund

Howes, his literary executor, a well-drawn word-portrait of Stow. We learn

that he was tall in stature, and, as befits the ideal student, lean in

body and face. His eyes were small and clear, and his sight excellent. As

might be expected, through long and active use, his memory was very good.

He was sober, mild, and corteous, and ever ready to impart information to

those that sought it.

He lived in an historically attractive age. It was a period when some of

our greatest countrymen worked and talked amongst men. Gifted authors made

the time glorious in our literary annals. Stow's fame mainly rests on

being an exact and picturesque describer of the London of Queen Elizabeth.

His _Survey_ is not a mere topographical account of the city, but a

pleasantly penned picture, full of life and character, of the social

condition, manners, customs, sports, and pastimes of the people.

John Stow was most minute as a writer, and his attention to slight

circumstances has caused some critics to make merry over his productions.

Fuller, for example, spoke of him "as such a smell-feast that he cannot

pass by the Guildhall but his pen must taste the good cheer therein." It

is his consideration of minor matters that renders his book so valuable to

the student of bygone times. We may quote, to illustrate this, a few

lines from his _Survey of London_. After a description of the Abbey of St.

Clare, he writes: "Near adjoining to this Abbey, on the south side

thereof, was sometime a farm belonging to the said nunnery, at which farm

I myself, in my youth, have fetched many a halfpennyworth of milk, and

never had less than three ale pints for a halfpenny in the summer, nor

less than one ale quart for a halfpenny in the winter, always hot from the

kine, as the same was milked and strained. One Trolop, afterwards Goodman,

was farmer there, and had thirty or forty kine to the pail. Goodman's son,

being heir to his father's purchase, let out the ground first for the

grazing of horses, and then for garden plots, and lived like a gentleman

thereby."

In about his fortieth year, Stow gave up his business as a tailor and

devoted his entire life to antiquarian pursuits. Fame he won, but not

fortune. In place of being wealthy in his old age, he, as we shall

presently see, suffered from poverty. His principal works include his

_Summary of English Chronicles_, first issued in 1561. In 1580, his

_Annals; or, a General Chronicle of England_ was published. His most

important work was given to the world in 1598, under the title of a

_Survey of London and Westminster_. Besides writing the foregoing original

books, he assisted on the continuation of Holinshed's _Chronicle_ and

Speght's edition of Chaucer, and he was employed on other undertakings.

[Illustration: JOHN STOW'S MONUMENT.]

Many a long journey Stow made in search of information. He could not ride,

and had to travel on foot. In the midst of great trials it is recorded

that his good humour never forsook him. In his old age he was troubled

with pains in his feet, and quietly remarked that his "afflictions lay in

the parts he had formerly made so much use of."

We might well suppose that Stow's blameless life would render him free

from suspicion, and that his grateful countrymen would regard with respect

his great work in writing the history of England. Such was not the case.

It was thought that his researches would injure the reformed religion, and

on this miserable plea he was cast into prison, and his humble home was

searched. We obtain from the report of the searchers an interesting

account of the contents of Stow's library. It consisted, we are told, of

"great collections of his own, of his English chronicles, also a great

sort of old books, some fabulous, as _Sir Gregory Triamour_, and a great

parcel of old manuscript chronicles in parchment and paper; besides

miscellaneous tracts touching physic, surgery, herbs, and medical

receipts, and also fantastical popish books printed in old time, and

others written in old English on parchment."

John Stow failed to make much money, but on the whole, he lived a peaceful

life, enjoying the many pleasures that fall to the lot of the student.

Happily for him, to use Howes' words, "He was careless of the scoffers,

backbiters, and detractors."

It is Howes who also tells that Stow always protested never to have

written anything either of malice, fear, or favour, nor to seek his own

particular gain or vain-glory, and that his only pains and care was to

write the truth.

At the age of four score years, his labours received State acknowledgment.

It was indeed a poor acknowledgment, for, in answer to a petition, James

I. granted him a licence to beg. Stow sought help, to use his own words,

as "a recompense for his labour and travel of forty-five years, in setting

forth the _Chronicles of England_, and eight years taken up in the _Survey

of the Cities of London and Westminster_, towards his relief in his old

age, having left his former means of living, and also employing himself

for the service and good of his country."

England in the Days of Old · 第 10 / 12 段