CHAPTER XXXII.

WHEN Sharpe's clerk retired, after serving that writ on Bassett,

Bassett went to Wheeler and treated it as a jest. But Wheeler looked

puzzled, and Bassett himself, on second thoughts, said he should like

advice of counsel. Accordingly they both went up to London to a

solicitor, and obtained an interview with a counsel learned in the law.

He heard their story, and said, “The question is, can you convince a

jury he was insane at the time?”

“But he can't get into court,” said Bassett. “I won't let him.”

“Oh, the court will make you produce him.”

“But I thought an insane person was civiliter mortuus, and couldn't

sue.”

“So he is; but this man is not insane in law. Shutting up a man on

certificates is merely a preliminary step to a fair trial by his peers

whether he is insane or not. Take the parallel case of a felon. A

magistrate commits him for trial, and generally on better evidence than

medical certificates; but that does not make the man a felon, or

disentitle him to a trial by his peers; on the contrary, it entitles

him to a trial, and he could get Parliament to interfere if he was not

brought to trial. This plaintiff simply does what, he will say, you

ought to have done; he tries himself; if he tries you at the same time,

that is your fault. If he is insane now, fight. If he is not, I advise

you to discharge him on the instant, and then compound.”

Wheeler said he was afraid the plaintiff was too vindictive to come to

terms.

“Well, then, you can show you discharged him the moment you had reason

to think he was cured, and you must prove he was insane when you

incarcerated him; but I warn you it will be uphill work if he is sane

now; the jury will be apt to go by what they see.”

Bassett and Wheeler retired; the latter did not presume to differ; but

Bassett was dissatisfied and irritated.

“That fellow would only see the plaintiff's side,” said he. “The fool

forgets there is an Act of Parliament, and that we have complied with

its provisions to a T.”

“Then why did you not ask his construction of the Act?” suggested

Wheeler.

“Because I don't want his construction. I've read it, and it is plain

enough to anybody but a fool. Well, I have consulted counsel, to please

you; and now I'll go my own way, to please myself.”

He went to Burdoch, and struck a bargain, and Sir Charles was to be

shifted to Burdoch's asylum, and nobody allowed to see him there, etc.,

etc.; the old system, in short, than which no better has as yet been

devised for perpetuating, or even causing, mental aberration.

Rolfe baffled this, as described, and Bassett was literally stunned. He

now saw that Sir Charles had an ally full of resources and resolution.

Who could it be? He began to tremble. He complained to the police, and

set them to discover who had thus openly and audaciously violated the

Act of Parliament, and then he went and threatened Dr. Suaby.

But Rolfe and Sir Charles, who loved Suaby as he deserved, had provided

against that; they had not let the doctor into their secret. He

therefore said, with perfect truth, that he had no hand in the matter,

and that Sir Charles, being bound upon his honor not to escape from

Bellevue, would be in the asylum still if Mr. Bassett had not taken him

out, and invoked brute force, in the shape of Burdoch. “Well, sir,”

said he, “it seems they have shown you two can play at that game.” And

so bade him good afternoon very civilly.

Bassett went home sickened. He remained sullen and torpid for a day or

two; then he wrote to Burdoch to send to London and try and recapture

Sir Charles.

But next day he revoked his instructions, for he got a letter from the

Commissioners of Lunacy, announcing the authoritative discharge of Sir

Charles, on the strong representation of Dr. Suaby and other competent

persons.

That settled the matter, and the poor cousin had kept the rich cousin

three months at his own expense, with no solid advantage, but the

prospect of a lawsuit.

Sharpe, spurred by Rolfe, gave him no breathing time. With the utmost

expedition the Declaration in Bassett _v._ Bassett followed the writ.

It was short, simple, and in three counts.

“For violently seizing and confining the plaintiff in a certain place,

on a false pretense that he was insane.

“For detaining him in spite of evidence that he was not insane.

“For endeavoring to remove him to another place, with a certain

sinister motive there specified.

“By which several acts the plaintiff had suffered in his health and his

worldly affairs, and had endured great agony of mind.”

And the plaintiff claimed damages, ten thousand pounds.

Bassett sent over for his friend Wheeler, and showed him the new

document with no little consternation.

But their discussion of it was speedily interrupted by the clashing of

triumphant bells and distant shouting.

They ran out to see what it was. Bassett, half suspecting, hung back;

but Mary Gosport's keen eye detected him, and she held up the heir to

him, with hate and triumph blazing in her face.

He crept into his own house and sank into a chair foudroye.

Wheeler, however, roused him to a necessary effort, and next day they

took the Declaration to counsel, to settle their defense in due form.

“What is this?” said the learned gentleman. “Three counts! Why, I

advised you to discharge him at once.”

“Yes,” said Wheeler, “and excellent advice it was. But my client--”

“Preferred to go his own road. And now I am to cure the error I did

what I could to prevent.”

“I dare say, sir, it is not the first time in your experience.”

“Not by a great many. Clients, in general, have a great contempt for

the notion that prevention is better than cure.”

“He can't hurt me,” said Bassett, impatiently. “He was separately

examined by two doctors, and all the provisions of the statute exactly

complied with.”

“But that is no defense to this plaint. The statute forbids you to

imprison an insane person without certain precautions; but it does not

give you a right, under any circumstances, to imprison a sane man. That

was decided in Butcher _v. _Butcher. The defense you rely on was

pleaded as a second plea, and the plaintiff demurred to it directly.

The question was argued before the full court, and the judges, led by

the first lawyer of the age, decided unanimously that the provisions of

the statute did not affect sane Englishmen and their rights under the

common law. They ordered the plea to be struck off the record, and the

case was reduced to a simple issue of sane or insane. Butcher _v._

Butcher governs all these cases. Can you prove him insane? If not, you

had better compound on any terms. In Butcher's case the jury gave 3,000

pounds, and the plaintiff was a man of very inferior position to Sir

Charles Bassett. Besides, the defendant, Butcher, had not persisted

against evidence, as you have. They will award 5,000 pounds at least in

this case.”

He took down a volume of reports, and showed them the case he had

cited; and, on reading the unanimous decision of the judges, and the

learning by which they were supported, Wheeler said at once: “Mr.

Bassett, we might as well try to knock down St. Paul's with our heads

as to go against this decision.”

They then settled to put in a single plea, that Sir Charles was insane

at the time of his capture.

This done, to gain time, Wheeler called on Sharpe, and, after several

conferences, got the case compounded by an apology, a solemn

retractation in writing, and the payment of four thousand pounds; his

counsel assured him his client was very lucky to get off so cheap.

Bassett paid the money, with the assistance of his wife's father: but

it was a sickener; it broke his spirit, and even injured his health for

some time.

Sir Charles improved the village with the money, and gave a copy-hold

tenement to each of the men Bassett had got imprisoned. So they and

their sons and their grandsons lived rent free--no, now I think of it,

they had to pay four pence a year to the Lord of the Manor.

Defeated at every point, and at last punished severely, Richard Bassett

fell into a deep dejection and solitary brooding of a sort very

dangerous to the reason. He would not go out-of-doors to give his

enemies a triumph. He used to sit by the fire and mutter, “Blow upon

blow, blow upon blow. My poor boy will never be lord of Huntercombe

now!” and so on.

Wheeler pitied him, but could not rouse him. At last a person for whose

narrow attainments and simplicity he had a profound, though, to do him

justice, a civil contempt, ventured to his rescue. Mrs. Bassett went

crying to her father, and told him she feared the worst if Richard's

mind could not be diverted from the Huntercombe estate and his hatred

of Sir Charles and Lady Bassett, which had been the great misfortune of

her life and of his own, but nothing would ever eradicate it. Richard

had great abilities; was a linguist, a wonderful accountant; could her

dear father find him some profitable employment to divert his thoughts?

“What! all in a moment?” said the old man. “Then I shall have to _buy_

it; and if I go on like this I shall not have much to leave you.”

Having delivered this objection, he went up to London, and, having many

friends in the City, and laying himself open to proposals, he got scent

at last of a new insurance company that proposed also to deal in

reversions, especially to entailed estates. By prompt purchase of

shares in Bassett's name, and introducing Bassett himself, who, by

special study, had a vast acquaintance with entailed estates, and a

genius for arithmetical calculation, he managed somehow to get him into

the direction, with a stipend, and a commission on all business he

might introduce to the office.

Bassett yielded sullenly, and now divided his time between London and

the country.

Wheeler worked with him on a share of commission, and they made some

money between them.

After the bitter lesson he had received Bassett vowed to himself he

never would attack Sir Charles again unless he was sure of victory. For

all this he hated him and Lady Bassett worse than ever, hated them to

the death.

He never moved a finger down at Huntercombe, nor said a word; but in

London he employed a private inquirer to find out where Lady Bassett

had lived at the time of her confinement, and whether any clergyman had

visited her.

The private inquirer could find out nothing, and Bassett, comparing his

advertisements with his performance, dismissed him for a humbug.

But the office brought him into contact with a great many medical men,

one after another. He used to say to each stranger, with an insidious

smile, “I think you once attended my cousin--Lady Bassett.”

A Terrible Temptation: A Story of To-Day · 第 32 / 44 章