A vulgar mind, in reply to these remarks regarding the gastronomic

ignorance of Snorter and Pogson, might say, “True, these gentlemen know

nothing of household economy, being occupied with other more important

business elsewhere. But what are their wives about? Lady Pogson in

Harley Street has nothing earthly to do but to mind her poodle, and her

mantua-maker's and housekeeper's bills. Mrs. Snorter in Belford Place,

when she has taken her drive in the Park with the young ladies, may

surely have time to attend to her husband's guests and preside over

the preparations of his kitchen, as she does worthily at his hospitable

mahogany.” To this I answer, that a man who expects a woman to

understand the philosophy of dinner-giving, shows the strongest evidence

of a low mind. He is unjust towards that lovely and delicate creature,

woman, to suppose that she heartily understands and cares for what she

eats and drinks. No: taken as a rule, women have no real appetites.

They are children in the gormandizing way; loving sugar, sops, tarts,

trifles, apricot-creams, and such gewgaws. They would take a sip of

Malmsey, and would drink currant-wine just as happily, if that accursed

liquor were presented to them by the butler. Did you ever know a

woman who could lay her fair hand upon her gentle heart and say on her

conscience that she preferred dry sillery to sparkling champagne? Such

a phenomenon does not exist. They are not made for eating and drinking;

or, if they make a pretence to it, become downright odious. Nor can

they, I am sure, witness the preparations of a really great repast

without a certain jealousy. They grudge spending money (ask guards,

coachmen, inn-waiters, whether this be not the case). They will give

their all, heaven bless them to serve a son, a grandson, or a

dear relative, but they have not the heart to pay for small things

magnificently. They are jealous of good dinners, and no wonder. I have

shown in a former discourse how they are jealous of smoking, and other

personal enjoyments of the male. I say, then, that Lady Pogson or Mrs.

Snorter can never conduct their husbands' table properly. Fancy either

of them consenting to allow a calf to be stewed down into gravy for one

dish, or a dozen hares to be sacrificed to a single puree of game, or

the best Madeira to be used for a sauce, or half a dozen of champagne to

boil a ham in. They will be for bringing a bottle of Marsala in place of

the old particular, or for having the ham cooked in water. But of

these matters--of kitchen philosophy--I have no practical or theoretic

knowledge; and must beg pardon if, only understanding the goodness of a

dish when cooked, I may have unconsciously made some blunder regarding

the preparation.

Let it, then, be set down as an axiom, without further trouble of

demonstration, that a woman is a bad dinner-caterer; either too great

and simple for it, or too mean--I don't know which it is; and gentlemen,

according as they admire or contemn the sex, may settle that matter

their own way. In brief, the mental constitution of lovely woman is such

that she cannot give a great dinner. It must be done by a man. It can't

be done by an ordinary man, because he does not understand it. Vain

fool! and he sends off to the pastry-cook in Great Russell Street or

Baker Street, he lays on a couple of extra waiters (green-grocers in the

neighborhood), he makes a great pother with his butler in the cellar,

and fancies he has done the business.

Bon Dieu! Who has not been at those dinners?--those monstrous

exhibitions of the pastry-cook's art? Who does not know those made

dishes with the universal sauce to each: fricandeaux, sweet-breads, damp

dumpy cutlets, &c., seasoned with the compound of grease, onions, bad

port-wine, cayenne pepper, curry-powder (Warren's blacking, for what

I know, but the taste is always the same)--there they lie in the old

corner dishes, the poor wiry Moselle and sparkling Burgundy in the

ice-coolers, and the old story of white and brown soup, turbot, little

smelts, boiled turkey, saddle-of-mutton, and so forth? “Try a little of

that fricandeau,” says Mrs. Snorter, with a kind smile. “You'll find

it, I think, very nice.” Be sure it has come in a green tray from Great

Russell Street. “Mr. Fitz-Boodle, you have been in Germany,” cries

Snorter, knowingly; “taste the hock, and tell me what you think of

THAT.”

How should he know better, poor benighted creature; or she, dear

good soul that she is? If they would have a leg-of-mutton and

an apple-pudding, and a glass of sherry and port (or simple

brandy-and-water called by its own name) after dinner, all would be very

well; but they must shine, they must dine as their neighbors. There

is no difference in the style of dinners in London; people with five

hundred a year treat you exactly as those of five thousand. They WILL

have their Moselle or hock, their fatal side-dishes brought in the green

trays from the pastry-cook's.

Well, there is no harm done; not as regards the dinner-givers at least,

though the dinner-eaters may have to suffer somewhat; it only shows

that the former are hospitably inclined, and wish to do the very best in

their power,--good honest fellows! If they do wrong, how can they help

it? they know no better.

And now, is it not as clear as the sun at noonday, that A WANT exists

in London for a superintendent of the table--a gastronomic agent--a

dinner-master, as I have called him before? A man of such a profession

would be a metropolitan benefit; hundreds of thousands of people of the

respectable sort, people in white waistcoats, would thank him daily.

Calculate how many dinners are given in the City of London, and

calculate the numbers of benedictions that “the Agency” might win.

And as no doubt the observant man of the world has remarked that the

freeborn Englishman of the respectable class is, of all others, the most

slavish and truckling to a lord; that there is no fly-blown peer but he

is pleased to have him at his table, proud beyond measure to call him

by his surname (without the lordly prefix); and that those lords whom he

does not know, he yet (the freeborn Englishman) takes care to have their

pedigrees and ages by heart from his world-bible, the “Peerage:” as

this is an indisputable fact, and as it is in this particular class of

Britons that our agent must look to find clients, I need not say it is

necessary that the agent should be as high-born as possible, and that he

should be able to tack, if possible, an honorable or some other handle

to his respectable name. He must have it on his professional card--

THE HONORABLE GEORGE GORMAND GOBBLETON,

Apician Chambers, Pall Mall.

Or,

SIR AUGUSTUS CARVER CRAMLEY CRAMLEY,

Amphitryonic Council Office, Swallow Street.

or, in some such neat way, Gothic letters on a large handsome

crockeryware card, with possibly a gilt coat-of-arms and supporters, or

the blood-red hand of baronetcy duly displayed. Depend on it plenty of

guineas will fall in it, and that Gobbleton's supporters will support

him comfortably enough.

For this profession is not like that of the auctioneer, which I take to

be a far more noble one, because more varied and more truthful; but in

the Agency case, a little humbug at least is necessary. A man cannot be

a successful agent by the mere force of his simple merit or genius in

eating and drinking. He must of necessity impose upon the vulgar to a

certain degree. He must be of that rank which will lead them naturally

to respect him, otherwise they might be led to jeer at his profession;

but let a noble exercise it, and bless your soul, all the “Court Guide”

is dumb!

He will then give out in a manly and somewhat pompous address what has

before been mentioned, namely, that he has seen the fatal way in which

the hospitality of England has been perverted hitherto, accapare'd by

a few cooks with green trays. (He must use a good deal of French in his

language, for that is considered very gentlemanlike by vulgar people.)

He will take a set of chambers in Canton Gardens, which will be richly

though severely furnished, and the door of which will be opened by

a French valet (he MUST be a Frenchman, remember), who will say, on

letting Mr. Snorter or Sir Benjamin Pogson in, that “MILOR is at

home.” Pogson will then be shown into a library furnished with massive

bookcases, containing all the works on cookery and wines (the titles

of them) in all the known languages in the world. Any books, of course,

will do, as you will have them handsomely bound, and keep them under

plate-glass. On a side-table will be little sample-bottles of wine, a

few truffles on a white porcelain saucer, a prodigious strawberry or

two, perhaps, at the time when such fruit costs much money. On the

library will be busts marked Ude, Careme, Bechamel, in marble (never

mind what heads, of course); and, perhaps, on the clock should be a

figure of the Prince of Conde's cook killing himself because the fish

had not arrived in time: there may be a wreath of immortelles on the

figure to give it a more decidedly Frenchified air. The walls will be of

a dark rich paper, hung round with neat gilt frames, containing plans

of menus of various great dinners, those of Cambaceres, Napoleon,

Louis XIV., Louis XVIII., Heliogabalus if you like, each signed by the

respective cook.

After the stranger has looked about him at these things, which he does

not understand in the least, especially the truffles, which look like

dirty potatoes, you will make your appearance, dressed in a dark dress,

with one handsome enormous gold chain, and one large diamond ring; a

gold snuff-box, of course, which you will thrust into the visitor's paw

before saying a word. You will be yourself a portly grave man, with

your hair a little bald and gray. In fact, in this, as in all other

professions, you had best try to look as like Canning as you can.

When Pogson has done sneezing with the snuff, you will say to him,

“Take a fauteuil. I have the honor of addressing Sir Benjamin Pogson, I

believe?” And then you will explain to him your system.

This, of course, must vary with every person you address. But let us

lay down a few of the heads of a plan which may be useful, or may

be modified infinitely, or may be cast aside altogether, just as

circumstances dictate. After all I am not going to turn gastronomic

agent, and speak only for the benefit perhaps of the very person who is

reading this:--

“SYNOPSIS OF THE GASTRONOMIC AGENCY OF THE HONORABLE GEORGE GOBBLETON.

“The Gastronomic Agent having traversed Europe, and dined with the best

society of the world, has been led naturally, as a patriot, to turn

his thoughts homeward, and cannot but deplore the lamentable ignorance

regarding gastronomy displayed in a country for which Nature has done

almost everything.

“But it is ever singularly thus. Inherent ignorance belongs to man; and

The Agent, in his Continental travels, has always remarked, that the

countries most fertile in themselves were invariably worse tilled than

those more barren. The Italians and the Spaniards leave their fields to

Nature, as we leave our vegetables, fish, and meat. And, heavens! what

richness do we fling away, what dormant qualities in our dishes do

we disregard,--what glorious gastronomic crops (if the Agent may

be permitted the expression)--what glorious gastronomic crops do we

sacrifice, allowing our goodly meats and fishes to lie fallow! 'Chance,'

it is said by an ingenious historian, who, having been long a secretary

in the East India House, must certainly have had access to the best

information upon Eastern matters--'Chance,' it is said by Mr.

Charles Lamb, 'which burnt down a Chinaman's house, with a litter of

sucking-pigs that were unable to escape from the interior, discovered to

the world the excellence of roast-pig.' Gunpowder, we know, was invented

by a similar fortuity.” [The reader will observe that my style in the

supposed character of a Gastronomic Agent is purposely pompous and

loud.] “So, 'tis said, was printing,--so glass.--We should have drunk

our wine poisoned with the villanous odor of the borachio, had not

some Eastern merchants, lighting their fires in the Desert, marked the

strange composition which now glitters on our sideboards, and holds the

costly produce of our vines.

“We have spoken of the natural riches of a country. Let the reader think

but for one moment of the gastronomic wealth of our country of England,

and he will be lost in thankful amazement as he watches the astonishing

riches poured out upon us from Nature's bounteous cornucopia! Look at

our fisheries!--the trout and salmon tossing in our brawling streams;

the white and full-breasted turbot struggling in the mariner's net; the

purple lobster lured by hopes of greed into his basket-prison, which

he quits only for the red ordeal of the pot. Look at whitebait, great

heavens!--look at whitebait, and a thousand frisking, glittering,

silvery things besides, which the nymphs of our native streams bear

kindly to the deities of our kitchens--our kitchens such as they are.

“And though it may be said that other countries produce the

freckle-backed salmon and the dark broad-shouldered turbot; though trout

frequent many a stream besides those of England, and lobsters sprawl

on other sands than ours; yet, let it be remembered, that our native

country possesses these altogether, while other lands only know them

separately; that, above all, whitebait is peculiarly our country's--our

city's own! Blessings and eternal praises be on it, and, of course, on

brown bread and butter! And the Briton should further remember, with

honest pride and thankfulness, the situation of his capital, of London:

the lordly turtle floats from the sea into the stream, and from the

stream to the city; the rapid fleets of all the world se donnent

rendezvous in the docks of our silvery Thames; the produce of our coasts

and provincial cities, east and west, is borne to us on the swift lines

of lightning railroads. In a word--and no man but one who, like The

Agent, has travelled Europe over, can appreciate the gift--there is no

city on earth's surface so well supplied with fish as London!

“With respect to our meats, all praise is supererogatory. Ask the

wretched hunter of chevreuil, the poor devourer of rehbraten, what they

think of the noble English haunch, that, after bounding in the Park of

Knole or Windsor, exposes its magnificent flank upon some broad silver

platter at our tables? It is enough to say of foreign venison, that THEY

ARE OBLIGED TO LARD IT. Away! ours is the palm of roast; whether of the

crisp mutton that crops the thymy herbage of our downs, or the noble ox

who revels on lush Althorpian oil-cakes. What game is like to ours? Mans

excels us in poultry, 'tis true; but 'tis only in merry England that the

partridge has a flavor, that the turkey can almost se passer de truffes,

that the jolly juicy goose can be eaten as he deserves.

“Our vegetables, moreover, surpass all comment; Art (by the means of

glass) has wrung fruit out of the bosom of Nature, such as she grants to

no other clime. And if we have no vineyards on our hills, we have gold

to purchase their best produce. Nature, and enterprise that masters

Nature, have done everything for our land.

“But, with all these prodigious riches in our power, is it not painful

to reflect how absurdly we employ them? Can we say that we are in the

habit of dining well? Alas, no! and The Agent, roaming o'er foreign

lands, and seeing how, with small means and great ingenuity and

perseverance, great ends were effected, comes back sadly to his own

country, whose wealth he sees absurdly wasted, whose energies are

misdirected, and whose vast capabilities are allowed to lie idle. . . .”

[Here should follow what I have only hinted at previously, a vivid and

terrible picture of the degradation of our table.] “. . . Oh, for a

master spirit, to give an impetus to the land, to see its great power

directed in the right way, and its wealth not squandered or hidden, but

nobly put out to interest and spent!

“The Agent dares not hope to win that proud station--to be the destroyer

of a barbarous system wallowing in abusive prodigality--to become a

dietetic reformer--the Luther of the table.

“But convinced of the wrongs which exist, he will do his humble endeavor

to set them right, and to those who know that they are ignorant (and

this is a vast step to knowledge) he offers his counsels, his active

co-operation, his frank and kindly sympathy. The Agent's qualifications

are these:-- '1. He is of one of the best families in England; and has

in himself, or through his ancestors, been accustomed to good living

for centuries. In the reign of Henry V., his maternal

great-great-grandfather, Roger de Gobylton' [the name may be varied, of

course, or the king's reign, or the dish invented], 'was the first

who discovered the method of roasting a peacock whole, with his

tail-feathers displayed; and the dish was served to the two kings at

Rouen. Sir Walter Cramley, in Elizabeth's reign, produced before

her Majesty, when at Killingworth Castle, mackerel with the famous

GOOSEBERRY SAUCE, &c.'

“2. He has, through life, devoted himself to no other study than that of

the table: and has visited to that end the courts of all the monarchs of

Europe: taking the receipts of the cooks, with whom he lives on terms of

intimate friendship, often at enormous expense to himself.

“3. He has the same acquaintance with all the vintages of the Continent;

having passed the autumn of 1811 (the comet year) on the great Weinberg

of Johannisberg; being employed similarly at Bordeaux, in 1834; at

Oporto, in 1820; and at Xeres de la Frontera, with his excellent

friends, Duff, Gordon and Co., the year after. He travelled to India and

back in company with fourteen pipes of Madeira (on board of the Samuel

Snob' East Indiaman, Captain Scuttler), and spent the vintage season in

the island, with unlimited powers of observation granted to him by the

great houses there.

“4. He has attended Mr. Groves of Charing Cross, and Mr. Giblett of

Bond Street, in a course of purchases of fish and meat; and is able at

a glance to recognize the age of mutton, the primeness of beef, the

firmness and freshness of fish of all kinds.

“5. He has visited the parks, the grouse-manors, and the principal

gardens of England, in a similar professional point of view.”

The Agent then, through his subordinates, engages to provide gentlemen

who are about to give dinner-parties--“1. With cooks to dress the

dinners; a list of which gentlemen he has by him, and will recommend

none who are not worthy of the strictest confidence.

“2. With a menu for the table, according to the price which the

Amphitryon chooses to incur.

“3. He will, through correspondence, with the various fournisseurs of

the metropolis, provide them with viands, fruit, wine, &c., sending to

Paris, if need be, where he has a regular correspondence with Messrs.

Chevet.

“4. He has a list of dexterous table-waiters (all answering to the name

of John for fear of mistakes, the butler's name to be settled according

to pleasure), and would strongly recommend that the servants of the

house should be locked in the back-kitchen or servants' hall during the

time the dinner takes place.

“5. He will receive and examine all the accounts of the

fournisseurs,--of course pledging his honor as a gentleman not to

receive one shilling of paltry gratification from the tradesmen he

employs, but to see that the bills are more moderate, and their goods of

better quality, than they would provide to any person of less experience

than himself.

“6. His fee for superintending a dinner will be five guineas: and The

Agent entreats his clients to trust ENTIRELY to him and his subordinates

for the arrangement of the repast,--NOT TO THINK of inserting dishes

of their own invention, or producing wine from their own cellars, as

he engages to have it brought in the best order, and fit for immediate

drinking. Should the Amphitryon, however, desire some particular dish

or wine, he must consult The Agent in the first case by writing, in the

second, by sending a sample to The Agent's chambers. For it is manifest

that the whole complexion of a dinner may be altered by the insertion

of a single dish; and, therefore, parties will do well to mention their

wishes on the first interview with The Agent. He cannot be called upon

to recompose his bill of fare, except at great risk to the ensemble of

the dinner and enormous inconvenience to himself.

“7. The Agent will be at home for consultation from ten o'clock until

two, earlier if gentlemen who are engaged at early hours in the City

desire to have an interview: and be it remembered, that a PERSONAL

INTERVIEW is always the best: for it is greatly necessary to know not

only the number but the character of the guests whom the Amphitryon

proposes to entertain,--whether they are fond of any particular wine or

dish, what is their state of health, rank, style, profession, &c.

“8. At two o'clock, he will commence his rounds; for as the metropolis is

wide, it is clear that he must be early in the field in some districts.

From 2 to 3 he will be in Russell Square and the neighborhood; 3 to 3

3/4, Harley Street, Portland Place, Cavendish Square, and the environs;

3 3/4 to 4 1/4, Portman Square, Gloucester Place, Baker Street, &c.;

4 1/4 to 5, the new district about Hyde Park Terrace; 5 to 5 3/4, St.

John's Wood and the Regent's Park. He will be in Grosvenor Square by 6,

and in Belgrave Square, Pimlico, and its vicinity, by 7. Parties there

are requested not to dine until 8 o'clock; and The Agent, once for all,

peremptorily announces that he will NOT go to the palace, where it is

utterly impossible to serve a good dinner.”

“TO TRADESMEN.

“Every Monday evening during the season the Gastronomic Agent proposes

to give a series of trial-dinners, to which the principal gormands of

the metropolis, and a few of The Agent's most respectable clients, will

be invited. Covers will be laid for TEN at nine o'clock precisely. And

as The Agent does not propose to exact a single shilling of profit from

their bills, and as his recommendation will be of infinite value to

them, the tradesmen he employs will furnish the weekly dinner gratis.

Cooks will attend (who have acknowledged characters) upon the same

terms. To save trouble, a book will be kept where butchers, poulterers,

fishmongers, &c. may inscribe their names in order, taking it by turns

to supply the trial-table. Wine-merchants will naturally compete every

week promiscuously, sending what they consider their best samples, and

leaving with the hall-porter tickets of the prices. Confectionery to

be done out of the house. Fruiterers, market-men, as butchers and

poulterers. The Agent's maitre-d'hotel will give a receipt to each

individual for the articles he produces; and let all remember that The

Agent is a VERY KEEN JUDGE, and woe betide those who serve him or his

clients ill!

“GEORGE GORMAND GOBBLETON.

“CARLTON GARDENS, June 10, 1842.”

Here I have sketched out the heads of such an address as I conceive a

gastronomic agent might put forth; and appeal pretty confidently to the

British public regarding its merits and my own discovery. If this be not

a profession--a new one--a feasible one--a lucrative one,--I don't

know what is. Say that a man attends but fifteen dinners daily, that

is seventy-five guineas, or five hundred and fifty pounds weekly, or

fourteen thousand three hundred pounds for a season of six months: and

how many of our younger sons have such a capital even? Let, then, some

unemployed gentleman with the requisite qualifications come forward. It

will not be necessary that he should have done all that is stated in the

prospectus; but, at any rate, let him SAY he has: there can't be much

harm in an innocent fib of that sort; for the gastronomic agent must be

a sort of dinner-pope, whose opinions cannot be supposed to err.

The Fitz-Boodle Papers · 第 6 / 7 段