The first that stormed were forty-two troopers dismounted, with their

pistols, and about as many firelocks. They were led on by Mr. Huson, a

puritan preacher, Captain Willers, and Lieutenant Benbow; then followed

some other musqueteers along the side of the Severn, under the Castle

Hill, and entered the town at the Water-lane Gate; after these marched

three hundred and fifty infantry, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel

Rinking. Having entered the streets of the town they marched to the

market place, surprised the guard, and put the captain to death; the rest

marched to the castle Foregate, which was also soon gained; the guard

having basely deserted it. The town being in possession of the

parliamentary forces, they let down the draw bridge, near the castle, and

the horse immediately entered under the command of Colonel Mytton and

Bowyer. It was now about break of day, and the inhabitants were filled

with consternation and surprise at beholding the enemy in the very heart

of the town, which, on retiring to rest the preceding night, they thought

the most secure in the island. About twelve o’clock the castle after a

feeble resistance surrendered, on condition that the English part of it

should march to Ludlow, but the Irish were delivered up to the

conquerors. At the time of the assault the governor, Sir Michael

Earnley, was confined by sickness to his bed; but waked by the noise of

the tumult, he sprang up at the moment the enemy were rushing into his

chamber, and with great courage refused to submit to the conquerors,

rejecting all quarter, he wantonly perished, covered more with wounds

than with glory. The loss in killed and wounded was inconsiderable; but

the prisoners and property seized by the victors was of great importance,

for here were taken eight knights and baronets, forty colonels, majors,

captains, and others of quality, besides the common soldiers, also

fifteen pieces of ordnance, several hundred stand of arms and powder, &c.

For these important services the general received the thanks of

parliament, and was made governor of the castle. The late lieutenant

governor was tried by a court martial at Gloucester, and afterwards

hanged, for negligence and cowardice, in suffering the place to be

surprised without his having made a suitable resistance. Prince Maurice

made his escape before the castle surrendered, but the whole of his

magazine fell into the hands of the victors.

In the contest between the king and the parliament, Colonel John Benbow,

uncle to the celebrated Admiral Benbow, united with the parliament

forces; but afterwards deserted his principles, and espoused the cause of

the monarch. He distinguished himself by opposing his former associates

at the taking of Shrewsbury, for which vacillating conduct he was

condemned by the parliament, and shot on the green before the castle,

October 15th, 1651. At the same time the parliament in order to strike

terror into those who favoured royalty, adjudged the Earl of Derby to

suffer at Bolton. Several other gentlemen of the first families in

England were also sentenced to death at the same period. An attempt was

made to reduce the town to loyal obedience, after the death of the

protector Cromwell, but the governor of the castle secured the place in

the interest of parliament.

At the restoration, notwithstanding the joy which was diffused through

the kingdom, it is probable there were some in every county who still

sighed for the Commonwealth. The municipal bodies of the realm,

terrified by the example of London, made haste to surrender the charters

they had received from former monarchs into the hands of the sovereign.

The corporation, however, of Shrewsbury stood out for a twelvemonth. At

length, on the 13th of June, 1684, it was agreed unanimously, that the

charter of the town should be surrendered and yielded up to his majesty,

when his pleasure should require it. On the 20th of August, it was

“Ordered that the mayor and committee attend the Lord Chief Justice

Jones, to discourse him, touching the renewing of the charter, and

unanimously agreed, that in the new charter there shall be only twelve

aldermen and twenty-four assistants.” The king’s death prevented this

instrument from passing the great seal in his name. Within a week after

that event, the corporation sent up an address to their new sovereign,

expressive of “their joyfulness in his succession, and humbly thanking

him for his gracious declaration in preferring the Protestant religion;”

no obscure intimation of their wishes on that momentous subject, which

engaged all ranks with an intensity of interest difficult to be conceived

by the present generation. On the 17th of March, 1684, the corporation

received their new charter, in which the king expresses his gracious

affection for the melioration of the town of Salop, and hopes that, if

the burgesses and inhabitants have more ample liberties and privileges,

they will be the better enabled and the more bound to render him the more

special service. He grants that the town shall be “a free town of

itself, and the burgesses and inhabitants shall be a body corporate, and

sue and be sued; that there shall be one good and discreet man of the

aldermen of the town who shall be mayor; twelve good and discreet men

(the mayor being one) who shall be aldermen; and twenty-four good and

discreet men, assistants.” Then follow various other officers, and a

clause empowering the corporation to supply vacancies occasioned by

death, &c. When James II. made a progress through this part of his

dominions, the corporation resolved to expend £200 in entertaining and

making a present to the king. They despatched two gentlemen to

Gloucester and Worcester for the purpose of ascertaining the manner in

which the royal traveller was entertained in those cities. They resolved

that the conduits should run with wine on the day of his majesty’s

entrance, and that the corporated companies should appear with their

drums, colours, flags, and streamers. The king arrived on the 24th of

August, and took up his abode at the Council House, where the corporation

presented him with a purse of gold containing one hundred guineas. On

the following morning, he exercised the gift of healing, by touching

several persons for the king’s evil. The king issued a proclamation on

the 17th of October for restoring corporations to their ancient charters

and franchises, and orders were the same day made in council for removing

all corporate officers, who had been put in by the crown since 1679.

Richard Mickleston was at this time mayor of Shrewsbury; under the new

charter of 1685 he was discharged from his office, and John Hill, Esq.,

elected in his room, under the charter of 1638.

The various “compositions” which the burgesses of Shrewsbury appear to

have entered into amongst themselves for the government of this borough,

clearly indicate that a large share of power was exercised by “the

commons” in its municipal institutions. The liberties and customs of the

burgesses or commons were confirmed by the charter of Henry II., and by

various others granted before and after the date of the compositions

alluded to. But the constitution of the borough was materially altered

by a charter of the 14th of Charles I., transferring to a select body the

functions previously exercised by the commons. This charter continued to

be the governing one till the passing of the new municipal act, in 1835.

The corporation by it was appointed to consist of a mayor, twenty-four

aldermen, and forty-eight assistants, with an indefinite number of

burgesses or freemen, under the style of the “mayor, aldermen, and

burgesses of the town of Shrewsbury, in the county of Salop,” instead of

the “bailiffs and burgesses,” as in the old charter. The ministerial

officers named in the charter were, the recorder and his deputy, the

steward, town clerk, two coroners, four auditors, two chamberlains, a

sword bearer, three serjeants-at-mace, and three serjeants-yeomen.

Exclusive jurisdiction in the borough was granted, the magistrates being

the mayor and ex-mayor, the bishop of Lichfield and Coventry, the

chancellor of the diocese, the recorder, steward, and three senior

aldermen. Few of them, however, continued to act. Petty sessions were

authorised to be held weekly, quarter sessions for all criminal actions

not capital, a weekly court of record for all personal suits to any

amount, and for ejectments, and a court leet, with view of frank-pledge.

A court of requests was established in the 23rd of George III. for the

recovery of debts under 40s., which was held every alternate week. The

number of suits in the court in 1839 was 1011. This court has been

superseded by the new county court act.

Under the new municipal act, the borough is included in schedule A,

amongst boroughs to have a commission of the peace, which has accordingly

been granted, and the court of quarter sessions and recorder

re-appointed; and in section I. of that schedule among those the

parliamentary boundaries of which were to be taken till altered by

parliament. The limits of the borough extend considerably beyond the

ancient boundaries, and now include the whole town and its suburbs. It

has been divided into five wards, and appointed to be governed by ten

aldermen and thirty councillors under the usual corporate style. The

income of the corporation in 1840, was £1903. 10s. 8d. The income for

the year ending September 1st, 1850, was £3184. 6s. 9d. of which £515.

11s. 3d. arose from the rental of premises; £1750. 1s. 11d. from the

borough rate; and the remainder from miscellaneous sources. The

principal items of expenditure for the same period are—police, £832. 1s.

4d.; salaries, £346. 14s.; rent and taxes, £42. 8s.; reparations, £187.

6s. 5d.; turns in the quarry and other annual payments, £267. 19s. 2d.;

prosecutions, £217. 19s. 5d.; maintenance and removal of prisoners, £245.

17s. 11d.; expenses at sessions, including fees, &c., £395. 1s. 4d.;

inquests and coroners expenses, £72. 4s. 6d. There was also a balance of

£265. 0s. 9d. in the treasurer’s hands. Shrewsbury has regularly

returned two members to parliament since the reign of Edward I. Previous

to the passing of the reform act the franchise was in the burgesses

inhabiting within the ancient limits of the borough, paying scot and lot,

and not receiving alms or charity. The county assizes, and quarter

sessions, are held here; petty sessions are held every Tuesday, and the

borough magistrates sit daily.

The following is a list of the members of parliament, the corporate body,

and the municipal officers of the borough of Shrewsbury for the year

1851:—

MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT.

Robert Anglionby Slaney, Esq., and Edward Holmes Baldock, Esq.

BOROUGH MAGISTRATES.

Edward Hughes, Esq., mayor; Joseph Birch, Esq., ex-mayor; Robert Burton,

Esq.; Edward Haycock, Esq.; William Henry Perry, Esq.; James Watkins,

Esq.; T. G. Gwyn, Esq.; Edward Morris, Esq., John Hazledine, Esq.

MAYOR—Edward Hughes, Esq.

ALDERMEN—John Thomas Smitheman, Esq.; Edward Haycock, Esq.; William

Wyburgh How, Esq.; John Loxdale, Esq.; James Watkins, Esq.; John Bowen,

Esq.; Robert Burton, Esq.; Thomas Groves, Esq.; John Legh, Esq.; Charles

Lloyd, Esq.

COUNCILLORS.

_Castle Ward Within_—William James Clement, Joseph Birch, William Henry

Perry, Edwin Foulkes, Thomas Hall, Richard Jeffreys Mulckleston.

_Castle Ward Without_—James Smith, Thomas Birch, John Bishton Minor,

Joseph Chune, Benjamin Birch, James Moore.

_Stone Ward Within_—Thomas Campbell Eyton, William Richard Stokes, David

Evans, James Burrey, Edward Hughes, Lewis Meredith.

_Stone Ward Without_—William Burr, Charles Bowen Teece, John Hazledine,

George Harper, Richard Taylor, William Butler Lloyd.

_Welsh Ward_—Thomas William Trouncer, Robert Mortimer Healing, Robert

Baugh Blakemore, William Onions, Robert Haycock, Henry Keate.

_Recorder_, Charles Harwood, Esq. _Coroner_ (_borough_), Henry Keate,

Esq. _Town Clerk_, J. J. Peel, Esq. _Clerk of the Peace_, G. Gordon,

Esq. _Magistrates’ Clerk_, W. H. Cooper, Esq. _Chief Constable_,

Captain Mayne. _Borough Treasurer_, Mr. Henry Pidgeon. _Surveyor_, Mr.

Thomas Tisdale. _Governor of the Gaol_, Mr. John Sheppard, _Town

Marshall and senior Serjeant_, S. Farlow. _Chief Constable_, William

Harper. _Serjeant of Mace_, John Thomas. _Town Crier_, George Rowe.

THE BOROUGH POLICE FORCE consists of a chief constable, two

superintendents, two inspectors, and thirteen constables.

THE COUNTY CONSTABULARY consists of a chief constable, two first class

superintendents, four second class superintendents, ten first class

constables, and forty second class constables.

IN the year 1756, thirty-seven colliers were brought to gaol for rioting

and committing outrages in the county, it being a time of scarcity for

all kinds of provisions. The trial took place at the spring assizes of

the following year. Ten of the rioters were left for execution; but the

judge sent his report express to the attorney-general, with an intimation

fixed for the day of execution, and the individuals two in number, who,

as he deemed it should suffer the sentence of the law. The report having

been transmitted to Mr. Pitt, then secretary of state, it lay there

untouched, and was never laid before the king. The day of execution

arrived, without any reprieve, and Mr. Leek, the deputy sheriff, was

advised by several of the principal gentlemen in the town to leave the

prisoners to their fate. But he was so much shocked at the thought of

executing so large a number, which he was convinced could not be the

intention of the judge, that he ventured to postpone the execution, and

sent off an express to London, on the return of which he had the

satisfaction of finding that his conduct was highly approved of, and

still more, the consciousness that he had saved eight lives. The

following is part of a letter written to him on the occasion by Lord

Chief Justice Willes:—“Till I saw your letter I was under the greatest

uneasiness,—for I took it for granted that all the ten rioters had been

executed on Saturday last; and, upon my return from the Home Circuit, on

Thursday last, I found that by a shameful neglect in one of the secretary

of state’s officers, no reprieve had been sent down; and, as it was then

too late to send one down, I saw no reason to hope that their execution

would be deferred to a longer time. But though, to be sure, you have

acted contrary to your duty, you have acted a wise, prudent, and most

humane part; and you have not only my thanks, but the thanks of some of

the greatest men in the kingdom, for the part you have acted on this

occasion.” In a letter from Mr. Leek’s agent in town it is stated, “My

Lord Commissioner Willes was so afflicted . . . that it really made him

ill; and he did not for two days go into the king’s closet, so much he

feared the effect it might have upon the king’s mind, if the affair was

communicated to his majesty while it was under that state of uncertainty.

Thank God, your prudent and well judged respite has prevented all the

uneasiness and mischiefs that might have happened; and I have the

pleasure to assure you that no step was ever taken that has given more

satisfaction, than this of yours has done. My Lord Commissioner Willes

waited this day upon the king with your letter, and has directed me to

acquaint you, by his majesty’s orders, that his majesty entirely approves

of what you have done.”

CHURCHES.

ST. MARY’S CHURCH stands in a commanding position in St. Mary’s street,

and is one of the most interesting ecclesiastical edifices in the

country. This fine structure is cruciform, and consists of nave, side

aisles, transept, chancel, two side chapels, and a tower, crowned with a

lofty and beautiful spire. In common with most of our early churches

there is no opportunity of ascertaining the precise date of its erection;

it is said to owe its foundation to Edgar, who, at the suggestion of

Archbishop Dunstan, placed in it a dean, seven prebends, and a parish

priest, with a stipend of £6. 6s. 8d. per annum. There is, however,

every probability that the foundation was antecedent to his reign. In

the time of Edward the Confessor, this college possessed a landed estate

of about 1300 acres, which it continued to hold at the Domesday survey,

but of which it was soon after deprived. From a very early period this

church enjoyed the privilege of a royal free chapel, and was therefore

exempt from the jurisdiction of the Bishops. These privileges formed a

frequent ground of contest between the sovereign pontiffs and the kings

of England. A particular instance relates to the church now under

consideration. About the year 1270, the dean had a dispute with the

Abbot of Salop, touching the right of presentation to the Church of

Fittes, or as it was then written, Fitesho, to which one Robert de Acton

had been instituted by the Bishop of Lichfield, and forcibly ejected by

the dean. Acton, being a crusader, was under the especial protection of

the pope, whose officer called “the Executor of the Cross,” sent an order

to the Abbot of Shrewsbury to restore the incumbent to his benefice.

This being done the king’s attorney-general filed an information against

the abbot, requiring him to answer ‘whereof he exercised jurisdiction in

the Chapel of Fitesho,’ appertaining to the King’s Free Chapel of St.

Mary, of Salop, which is exempt, so that neither our lord “the pope, nor

any other ecclesiastical judge hath jurisdiction therein.” Judgment

passed against the abbot, and he was sentenced to pay damages to the king

and to suffer imprisonment.

The Dean of St. Mary’s, had, from time immemorial, the power of

collecting and paying into the king’s exchequer, the tenths or other

subsidies arising from the deanery and prebends. Edward the first

confirmed this privilege; and his grandson, in the eighteenth year of his

reign, recognized by directing the sheriffs of Salop and Hereford not to

enter the jurisdiction of the royal chapel, or to levy a distress on the

possessions thereof, for any subsidies or tenths, unless the dean should

neglect to make a due return. At the dissolution of collegiate churches

1. of Edward VI., the revenues which consisted chiefly of tithe, amounted

to £42, the greatest portion of which was granted by that monarch towards

the endowment of the Free Schools. According to Leland it had a dean and

nine poor prebendaries, also vicars choral, two chauntry priests, a

parish priest, and a clerk or assistant. The peculiar jurisdiction of

the Royal Free Chapel remained till the recent act of parliament restored

it to the bishop of the diocese, and was held in lease at an annual rent

of £1. 6s. 8d., of the corporation to whom Queen Elizabeth granted it by

charter, dated 23rd May, 1571. The usual style of the minister was

“ordinary and official, principal of the peculiar and exempt jurisdiction

of the Free Royal Chapel of the Blessed Virgin Mary.” In his courts

wills were proved, letters of administration were granted, and all

ecclesiastical matters, arising within the parish and its subordinate

chapelries, adjudicated. In 1632, King Charles I., during his residence

at the council house, attended divine service here, received the

sacraments, and made solemn protestations of his fidelity to the

principles of the reformed religion.

This venerable edifice exhibits various styles of architecture: the

Anglo-Norman of the 12th century in the basement of the nave and most of

the doors; the lancet style of the 13th century, in the chancel and

transept, and the obtuse arch of the 15th century in the side aisles and

chapels. The basement of the tower is of red sand stone, and the upper

portion of grey, and in the Anglo-Norman and early pointed styles of

architecture. The dimensions of the church are—length from east to west

160 feet—breadth of nave and side aisles 53 feet—transept 90 feet, and

height of tower and steeple 223 feet; the height of the steeple from the

bed of the river 300 feet. The beautifully proportioned octagonal spire

which rises from a tower of noble proportions, is a conspicuous ornament

to the town, and is seen from the adjacent country to a considerable

distance. The nave and side aisles externally, in the pointed style of

the 15th century, are of the Grinshill free stone, and entered on the

north and south-west by beautiful semi-circular arches, adorned with

chevron, lozenged and foliated mouldings; the south-west porch is in the

Anglo-Norman style, having zigzag mouldings, issuing from clustered

columns, with foliated capitals. On each side is a small pointed window,

exhibiting specimens of the earliest rudiments of the millioned Gothic

architecture, in which has lately been placed some highly interesting

painted glass, of German execution, on which are depicted various

incidents, chiefly from the Apocrypha. A stone porch, entered by a

pointed arch, had recently been erected before the corresponding door on

the north side.

History, Gazetteer, and Directory of Shropshire [1851] · 第 7 / 116 段