THOUGHTS UPON FUTURE LIFE.

It is obviously impossible to treat a subject so vast and so

profoundly interesting as this within the limits of a _Parish Paper_,

except in the most cursory and superficial manner. Yet I am induced to

make the attempt, in order, if possible, to impress my readers with

such ideas of our life in heaven as are more in accordance with the

nature of man and the Word of God, than, I am inclined to think,

obtain among many sincere Christians, who accordingly are deprived of

encouragements in duty, comforts in sorrow, and bright hopes to cheer

them amid the world's darkness, which they might otherwise possess.

Let us inquire, then, in what shall consist the believer's happiness

in God's presence.

Now, it will greatly aid us in answering this question regarding our

true life in eternity, if we first consider what constitutes our true

life in time, or what would constitute our perfect happiness now, if

in the full enjoyment of all our mental and bodily powers, and if, in

the best possible circumstances, we perfectly fulfilled upon earth

God's purpose in our creation.

In endeavouring to solve this question, I remark that our perfection

consists in the gratification of every part of our many-sided nature.

Thus, for instance, enjoyment might be derived through our senses,

though the intellect was comparatively weak, and our moral being

depraved; or from the exercise of our intellectual or spiritual

nature, while the body suffered from pain: or delight might be poured

through all those channels, but yet if we were doomed to be solitary

beings, without any companion or friend with whom to communicate or

share our gladness, or were prevented from expressing our thoughts and

desires by action, the result in either of these supposed cases would

not be perfect happiness. But, on the other hand, if we can imagine a

man with his whole nature in a state of perfect health, each portion

demanding and obtaining its appropriate nourishment, and with all his

powers beautifully balanced and in perfect harmony with the plan of

God, "according to the effectual working of the measure in every

part,"--the senses ministering to the most refined tastes,--the

intellect full of light in the apprehension of truth, and strong

in its discovery,--the moral being possessing perfect holiness and

unerring subjection to the will of God,--the love of society able

to rest upon fitting objects, and to find a fall return for its

sympathies in suitable companionships, while ample scope was afforded

for activity by congenial labour;--then would such a state be

perfection or fulness of joy in God's presence here below. I do not,

of course, allege that every part of our being has the same capacity

to afford us joy, or that the flood can pour itself into the soul with

the same fulness through each of these channels, as if, for instance,

we depended in the same degree for enjoyment upon our sentient as we

do upon our intellectual or moral nature. All I mean to assert is,

that whatever proportion may come through each, God has so made us,

that perfect joy is derived only through all. Such is man's actual

constitution as he came from the hands of his Maker; and such would

have been his happiness had he remained unfallen. Placed, as Adam was,

in a material world so rich in sources of physical happiness, with

an intellect capable of unlocking the countless treasures of

science,--with a nature pure and spotless, delighting in the excellent

God,--with society begun with woman as a helpmeet for him, and

with the active labour required "to dress and keep" his earthly

paradise,--he possessed, in such perfect adaptations, a heaven upon

earth. And had perfect man been translated to another region, we

cannot conceive his joy thereby to become essentially different in

kind, though different in degree, supposing him to remain the same

being, and to possess the same human nature. Now, man's fall has not

altered this principle. Sin is a perversion of human nature, not its

annihilation; a disorder of its powers, not their destruction. Nor is

restoration by Jesus Christ the gift of a different constitution, as

if He made us something else than human beings, but the renovation of

the old constitution after its original type. It is making the "old

man," diseased, bent down, paralysed, deaf, blind, the "new man," with

frame erect, limbs strong, eyes and ears open, and all his powers

fresh and vigorous for immortality; and, therefore, that which would

constitute the happiness of man were he perfect on earth, will be

his happiness, though in a higher degree, when he is made perfect in

heaven. This supposition, I repeat, only assumes the fact that we

shall be the same persons for ever; that human nature will never

cease to be human nature, or be changed into a different species of

existence, no more than Jesus Christ, the Head of His Church, will

ever cease to be what He is--"_the man_ Christ Jesus," with a human

body and a human soul, "the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever."

There is another way in which I might describe the nature of our

future life, although I shall base my remarks on the principles now

stated. We must admit that the perfection of our being is fellowship

with God the Father in the possession of that spirit of son-ship which

was revealed in Jesus Christ the Son of God and the Son of man. This,

and this alone, must insure fellowship with Him in His character and

joy. We shall consequently rejoice in all that He rejoices in--_as far

as this is possible for creatures_. Thus, if He rejoices in the glory

of His own Being, as Father, Son, and Spirit, so shall we; if He

rejoices in all His works, so shall we; if He rejoices in what He

does, in what He knows, in what He purposes, so shall we; if He

rejoices in the communion of holy and happy men and angels, so shall

we. In one word, if "our chief end is to glorify God," when that

end is fulfilled, we shall "enjoy Him for ever." And this was our

Saviour's prayer when He said, "The glory Thou hast given me I have

given them, that we may be one!"

But as those two lines of thought would lead practically to the same

conclusion, it seems to me that the nature of our future life will be

best understood by most of my readers if I endeavour to shew "what we

shall be," according to the arrangement already proposed.

Let us, then, meditate on the glorious supply which God has provided

for filling up every part of this our complex nature in heaven.

Parish Papers · 第 38 / 67 题