CHAPTER II

POISONS USED BY THE EGYPTIANS, GREEKS, ROMANS, HEBREWS, CHINESE AND

HINDUS IN ANCIENT TIMES

Many mysterious poisons are referred to in the legends and sagas that

have come down to us from the dim ages of the past.

The earliest deity associated with poisons is Gula, whose name was

revered by the Sumerians about 4500 B.C. She was known as “The Mistress

of Charms and Spells,” the “Terrible Goddess,” “Controller of noxious

poisons,” and was the deified form of the sorceress. Medical schools at

Borsippa and Sirpurra were under her protection. She is described on a

cuneiform tablet, said to have been written about 1400 B.C., as:—

“Gula, the woman, the mighty one, the prince of all women.

His seed with a poison not curable

Without issue; in his body may she place

All the days of his life,

Blood and pus like water may he pour forth.”

Ages ago a mysterious country in the far North was supposed to be ruled

and dominated by sorcerers and kindred beings, all of whom were said to

be children of the Sun. Here dwelt Æëtes, Perses, Hecate, Medea and

Circe. To Hecate is ascribed the foundation of sorcery and the discovery

of poisonous plants. Her knowledge of magic and spells was supposed to

be unequalled. She transmitted her power to Medea, whose wonderful

exploits are described in early Greek mythology, and who by her magic

arts subdued the dragon that guarded the golden fleece and assisted

Jason to perform his famous deeds. Hecate’s garden is described by the

poets as being enclosed in lofty walls with thrice-folding doors of

ebony, which were guarded by terrible forms, and only those who bore the

leavened rod of expiation and the concealed conciliatory offering could

enter. Towering above was the temple of the dread sorceress, where the

ghastly sacrifices were offered and all kinds of horrible spells worked.

According to tradition, after Medea’s adventures with Jason she returned

with him to Thessaly, and on their arrival they found Æson, the father

of Jason, and Pelias, his uncle, who had usurped the throne, both old

and decrepit. Medea was requested to exert her magical powers to make

the old man young again, an operation which she is said to have speedily

performed by infusing the juice of certain potent plants into his veins,

and thus foreshadowing a recent operation for rejuvenating the old by

means of injecting the solution of a certain gland.

Medea became the wife of Ægeus, king of Athens, whose son, Theseus, had

been brought up in exile and who resolved to return to Athens to claim

his rights. Medea, hearing of this, and for some reason greatly

resenting it, prepared a poisoned goblet and gave it to Ægeus at an

entertainment which he gave to Theseus, with the intent that he should

hand it to his son. At the critical moment the king cast his eyes on the

sword of Theseus, recognizing it as the weapon which he had given to his

son when a child, directing that it should be brought by him when a man

as a token of the mystery of his birth. The king at once threw the

goblet from him and embraced his son, and as tradition has it, Medea

fled from Athens in a chariot drawn by dragons.

Circe’s charms were more seductive and romantic. She is said to have

been endowed with exquisite beauty, which she employed to allure

travellers to her territory. On their landing she entreated and enticed

them to drink from her enchanted cup, but no sooner was the draught

swallowed than the unfortunate stranger was turned into a hog and driven

by the magician to her sty, where he still retained the consciousness of

what he had been and lived to repent his folly.

These mythological stories tend to show that some knowledge of poisonous

substances existed at a very remote period.

In ancient Egypt a certain crude scientific knowledge probably existed

from a period of great antiquity, and some of the earliest deities,

especially the god Thoth, are associated with the genesis of science,

arts and magic. Thoth is reputed to have been the author of six divine

works dealing with these subjects. He was identified by the Greeks with

Hermes Trismegistos, or the “Thrice Great,” to whom they attributed the

foundation of the science of chemistry. Menes, the earliest Egyptian

king of whom we have record, was said to have studied the properties of

plants, and other Egyptian rulers cultivated the art of medicine,

probably through the priests, who were the chief practitioners in the

art of healing in those early times. They apparently gathered knowledge

of certain poisonous bodies, both vegetable and mineral. They were

learned in the art of alchemy and initiated votaries into its mysteries

in their schools of science. The secrets taught were forbidden to be

revealed under penalty of death, and therefore, probably, many of the

discoveries they made were lost, but there is sufficient evidence to

prove that they were conversant with crude arsenic, opium, mandrake,

lead and other poisonous substances. This knowledge was probably handed

down by oral tradition as part of the priestcraft for centuries before

it was committed to writing.

The earliest known record of the actual preparation of a substance of a

lethal nature is mentioned in an Egyptian papyrus, now in the Louvre, in

which the following sentence, as translated by Duteuil, occurs:

“Pronounce not the name of I.A.O. under the penalty of the peach.”

The Egyptians were probably the first to practise distillation, and from

the stones of certain fruits they apparently discovered that they could

extract a powerful poison which we now know as prussic acid.

The Hebrews in ancient times were also acquainted with the use of

poisonous substances. Arsenic was known to them as “Sam,” aconite as

“Boschka,” and they are said to have known of the poisonous properties

of ergot which they called “Son.”

Coming to times of early culture in Greece, the knowledge of poisons had

made a considerable advance. The Greeks knew of arsenic in the form of

realgar and orpiment, antimony, mercury, gold, silver, copper and lead,

and they probably had a knowledge of their poisonous properties, as they

recommend hot oil as an antidote in a case of poisoning and mention

other means to promote vomiting and prevent a poison being absorbed into

the system.

Of the vegetable poisons known and used by the Greeks hemlock appears to

have been chiefly employed. They looked upon suicide under certain

conditions as a noble act, and sanctioned the use of the poison cup by

those who desired to terminate their existence on earth. They also

employed poison as a means of execution. The State Poison was chiefly

composed of a species of hemlock called cicuta, the seeds of which were

pounded in a mortar as the first step in preparation. Several of the

early historians, including Plato, describe the action of the plant

used, but its identification has long been a matter of dispute. From all

accounts the poison draught does not appear to have been either very

powerful or rapid in its action, as a second dose was often found to be

necessary before death ensued.

At the death of Phocion it is recorded that “having drunk all the

hemlock juice, the quantity was found insufficient and the executioner

refused to prepare more unless he was paid twelve drachmas.” When Seneca

also wished to end his life, a friend and physician, at his request,

procured for him some of the Athenian State Poison, but when he took it

the effect was inadequate.

The circumstances attending the death of Socrates, which happened in the

year 402 B.C., are thus recounted by Plato:

“When the fatal cup was brought he asked what it was necessary for him

to do. ‘Nothing more,’ replied the servant of the judges, ‘than as soon

as you have drunk of the draught, to walk about until you find your legs

become weary and afterwards lie down upon your bed.’

“He took the cup without any emotion or change in his countenance and,

looking at him in a steady and assured manner,

“‘Well!’ said he, ‘what say you of this drink?’

“‘May a libation be made out of it?’

“Upon being told that there was only enough for one dose, ‘At least,’

said he, ‘we may pray to the gods as is our duty and implore them to

make our exit from this world and our last stage happy, which is what I

most ardently beg of them.’

“Having spoken these words he remained silent for some time and then

drank off the whole draught.

“After reproving his friends for indulging in loud lamentations, he

continued to walk about as he had been directed until he found his legs

grow weary. Then he lay down upon his back and the person who had

administered the poison went up to him and examined for a little time

his feet and legs, and then squeezing his foot strongly, asked whether

he felt him? Socrates replied that he did not. He then did the same to

his legs, and proceeding upwards in this way, showed us that he was cold

and stiff, and he afterwards approached him and said to us that when the

effect of the poison reached the heart Socrates would depart. And now

the lower parts of his body were cold, when he uncovered himself and

said, which were his last words, ‘Crito, we owe Æsculapius a cock. Pay

the debt and do not forget it.’

“‘It shall be done,’ replied Crito. ‘But consider whether you have

anything else to say.’

“Socrates answered in the negative, but was in a short time convulsed.

The man then uncovered him; his eyes were fixed and when Crito observed

this he closed his eyelids and his mouth.”

The poison which is given the general name of φάρμακον by Plato, is

termed κώνειον by Xenophon in relating the execution of Theramenes,

whose death occurred but forty years after Socrates. The same word is

again used by Plutarch in describing the State Poison by which Phocion

fell a victim to the Athenians in the year B.C. 317.

Aristophanes, who was contemporary with Socrates, furnishes further

evidence that the State Poison was commonly known in Athens by the name

κώνειον, for in “The Frogs,” which was acted many years before his

death, the following allusion to the poison occurs:—

HERCULES: Then there is a short and beaten road—that by the mortar.

BACCHUS: Speakest thou of hemlock, then?

HERCULES: Most certainly.

BACCHUS: A journey cold and winterly forsooth, for it immediately

congeals the shins.

Pliny and the other Latin authors use the word cicuta when alluding to

the State Poison of the Greeks. Dioscorides (_circa_ A.D. 40) in his

work on Materia Medica, describing the cicuta, says it has a knotted

stem and likens it to fennel. “Its branches shoot with umbels at their

summits, while it bears a whitish flower with a heavy smell and a fruit

like that of anise, but whiter.” From this it was evidently an

umbelliferous plant. Pliny refers to the spots on the stem, which

further identifies the plant as the _Conium maculatum_, or hemlock.

According to Sibthorpe, _Conium maculatum_ grows in various parts of

Greece and in the vicinity of Athens, and no other poisonous

umbelliferous plant grows in that country. This seems conclusive

evidence that the cicuta of the Greeks was the plant we know as _Conium

maculatum_.

In addition to this, Pliny states that the cicuta (described by him as

the Athenian State Poison) grows in Attica and at Megara, and describes

the seeds and leaves as particularly fatal when drunk in wine, the

former producing the most deadly effects.

The clinical effects of the drug as graphically described by Plutarch

are identical with those produced by conium or hemlock. He mentions the

coldness of the extremities, concluding with its influence on the brain,

which would account for the strangeness of the last words of Socrates,

referring to a sacrifice to the deity who presided over the Medical Art.

It is probable that opium was sometimes combined with hemlock, judging

from the statement of Theophrastus, who was born only twenty-eight years

after the death of Socrates.

He says: “Thrasyas, the Mantinian, stated that by making use of the

juices of cicuta, the poppy and such other things, he had discovered a

substance which occasioned death easily and without pain, and so

portable and minute that the weight of a δραχμή (about sixty grains) was

sufficient and absolutely irremediable.” Further, that it was capable of

being preserved for any time without alteration. That a powerful

preparation and certain in effect was required at the time of the death

of Socrates, is evident from the caution of the executioner, who states

that none of the contents of the cup could be spared. Judging from all

accounts, and the evidence afforded by the description of its action,

there seems little doubt that the Athenian State Poison consisted of

hemlock, probably in the form of the concentrated juice of the leaves,

to which a proportion of poppy juice was added to render its action more

certain.

A curious custom prevailed among the inhabitants of the island of Ceos

in which poison played a part. When the old men found they were no

longer of service to the State and began to feel life a burden, they

assembled at a banquet of death and, with their heads crowned with

chaplets, cheerfully drained the poison cup. A relic of this ancient

custom was once practised at Marseilles, where a poison was kept by the

public authorities, of which hemlock was an ingredient. A dose of this

was allowed by the magistrates to anyone who could bring a sufficient

reason why he should deserve death. Valerius Maximus observes, “This

custom came from Greece, particularly from the island of Ceos, where I

saw an example of it in a woman of great quality who, having lived very

happy ninety years, obtained leave to die in this way, lest by living

longer she should happen to see a change of her good fortune.”

The reputed poisonous property of bull’s blood is recorded by various

ancient writers, and it is stated that Æson, Midas King of Phrygia,

Plutarch and Themistocles the Athenian leader employed it as a means of

suicide. It is probable that some strong poisonous vegetable substance

such as cicuta was mixed with it.

The symptoms and signs which were accepted in early times as evidence of

poisoning are sufficiently crude to inspire us with considerable doubt

as to the reliability of many of the cases narrated. That there were

certain post-mortem appearances which were generally considered as

evidence of death by poison is recorded by Cicero, Tacitus and other

early writers. In the account given by Suetonius of the death of

Germanicus, who was poisoned by Piso at the instance of Tiberius, they

are enumerated as “livid spots on the face and body, and foam at the

mouth.” It was further generally believed that worms could not generate

in the bodies of persons who had died from the effect of poison.

Dioscorides throws a further light on the poisons of antiquity in his

work on Materia Medica, which for fifteen centuries or more remained the

chief authority on that subject. He mentions cantharides, copper,

mercury, lead and arsenic. Among the animal poisons he includes toads,

salamanders, poisonous snakes, a peculiar kind of honey, and the blood

of the ox, probably after it had decomposed. The sea-hare is frequently

alluded to by the ancient Greeks, and was evidently regarded by them as

capable of producing a very powerful poison. Domitian is said to have

administered it to Titus. It is supposed to have been one of the genus

Aplysia, among the gasteropods, and is described by the old writers as a

dreadful object which was neither to be touched nor looked upon with

safety.

Among the poisonous plants enumerated by Dioscorides are the poppy,

black and white hellebore, henbane, mandragora, hemlock, elaterium, the

juices of a species of euphorbia, and apocynae. The black and white

hellebore were known to the Romans and used by them as an insecticide,

and Pliny states that the Gauls used a preparation of veratrum to poison

their arrows. Arsenic, in the form of the native realgar and orpiment,

was employed by the Greeks as a caustic and for removing hair from the

face; but no mention is made of it being used internally or as a poison.

Copper, mercury, and lead were also used in their medical treatment. The

study of poisons was forbidden for a long period, and Galen mentions the

fact that only a few philosophers dared treat the subjects in their

works.

Theophrastus states that the poison of most subtle operation of his time

was extracted from wolf’s bane (aconite); no antidote had been

discovered to this poison and it was a capital crime to have in one’s

possession the plant from which it was extracted. He tells us that in

Ethiopia “there grows a certain deadly root, with which the people smear

their arrows,” and “In Scythia there are others some of which kill at

once those who eat them, some after an interval shorter or longer, so

that in the latter case men have a lingering death.” He thus relates the

story of one Thrasyas of Mantineia, who had discovered

“a poison which produces an easy and painless end; he used the juices of

hemlock, poppy, and other such herbs, so compounded as to make a dose of

conveniently small size, weighing only somewhat less than a quarter of

an ounce. For the effects of this compound there is absolutely no cure,

and it will keep any length of time without losing its virtue at all. He

used to gather his hemlock, not just anywhere, but at Susa, or some

other cold and shady spot; and so too with the other ingredients. His

pupil Alexias was also clever and no less skilful than his master, being

also versed in the science of medicine generally.

“At last Eudemus, the vendor of drugs, who had a high reputation in his

business, after making a wager that he would experience no effect before

sunset, drank quite a moderate dose, and it proved too strong for his

power of resistance: while the Chian Eudemus took a draught of hellebore

and was not purged. And on one occasion he said that in a single day he

took two and twenty draughts in the market-place as he sat at his stall,

and did not leave the place till it was evening, and then he went home

and had a bath and dined, and was not sick. However, this man was able

to hold out because he had provided himself with an antidote; for he

said that after the seventh dose he took a draught of tart vinegar with

pumice-stone dust in it, and later on took a draught of the same in wine

in like manner; and that the virtue of the pumice-stone dust is so great

that if one puts it into a boiling pot of wine it causes it to cease to

boil, not merely for the moment, but altogether, clearly because it has

a drying effect and it catches the vapour and passes it off. It was by

this antidote that Eudemus was able to contain himself in spite of the

large quantity of hellebore which he took.”

Livy records that about 200 B.C. several persons of distinction died in

a mysterious way in Rome. At first it was thought that they had

succumbed to plague, but Quintus Fabius Maximus is said to have been

informed by a female slave, that the persons had been poisoned and that

she could reveal the names of the guilty. The matter was laid before the

consuls and the Senate. The stipulated pardon was granted, and, guided

by the slave, the officers of justice are said to have discovered the

poisoners, among whom were women belonging to the noblest families of

Rome. Twenty in all were seized; two of them, Cornelia and Serpi,

undertook to speak for the rest, and declared that the drugs they had

prepared were medicinal. They were told that to prove this, the

preparation they had made would be tried on themselves and to this test

they agreed. After drinking the draughts it is said they all died. One

hundred and seventy more of the noblest ladies of Rome were seized, on

similar information and condemned, and before that day, says Livy, there

was never an inquest on poisoning. To mark this memorable example of

what had never been done before, it was resolved to have a nail driven

into the temple of Jupiter. A dictator was appointed for that mystic

duty, a master of the horse, and he drove a nail into the temple of

Jupiter, after which a stop was put to poisoning for two or three

centuries.

Unfortunately, however, the method of taking life by poisons did not die

out, but apparently increased and became very common in Rome under the

early Emperors. Among these nefarious practitioners, mostly apparently

women, was Locusta, who lived in the time of Nero. She had been

condemned to death for a case proved against her, but her life was

spared, so that she might use her nefarious methods in the service of

the State. She was employed by Agrippina to poison the Emperor Claudius

and to her is attributed the death of Britannicus, whom Nero wished to

remove from his path. Britannicus was dining with his brother and the

Imperial family, and as was the custom of the Romans, hot water was

brought round by slaves to the table, the water being heated to varied

degrees to suit the taste of the drinker. The cup of water handed to

Britannicus proved to be too hot and he gave it back to the attendant

slave, who added cold water to it, which addition is supposed to have

contained the poison, for no sooner had he swallowed the draught than he

fell back, gasping for breath. His mother, Agrippina, and Octavia, his

sister, became terror-stricken, but Nero, unmoved, calmly remarked that

he often had such fits in his youth without danger, and the banquet

proceeded.

A curious tradition which has survived from early times, and still

entertained by the ignorant, is, that if a body after a sudden death

rapidly decomposes, it is to be attributed to the effects of poison,

thus when Britannicus died it is recorded that the Romans attempted to

conceal his discoloured face by the use of paint.

Locusta appears to have been appointed a kind of unofficial

poisoner-in-ordinary to the Emperor, one of her duties being to train

pupils so that her secrets should not be lost. She was encouraged to

experiment with her knowledge on slaves, who were liberally supplied for

the purpose.

The Persians in ancient times are said to have studied with care the art

of poisoning. Plutarch and Ctesias relate that Queen Parysatis, the

mother of Cyrus the younger, during the reign of Artaxerxes II (405–359

B.C.), poisoned her daughter-in-law Statira by means of a knife, one

side of the blade being smeared with venom. A bird was set before the

two queens at supper and was divided by the poisoned knife; Parysatis

ate her half with impunity, but Statira died. Such is the story, but

there is no evidence to corroborate it. The Carthaginians were

apparently also skilled in the art of poisons, and it is related that

they killed Regulus, the Roman general, by this means.

With reference to the use of poisons in Persia in early times the poet

Nizámi, in his _Treasury of Secrets_, relates a story of rivalry between

two court physicians which finally reached such a point that they

challenged one another to a duel or ordeal by poison. It was agreed that

each should take a poison supplied by his antagonist, of which he should

then endeavour to counteract the effects by a suitable antidote. The

first prepared a poisonous draught “the fierceness of which would have

melted black stone”; his rival drained the cup and at once took an

antidote which rendered it innocuous. It was now his turn, and he picked

a rose from the garden, breathed an incantation over it, and bade his

antagonist smell it, whereupon the latter at once fell down dead. That

his death was due simply to fear and not to any poisonous or magical

property of the rose is clearly indicated by the poet:

“Through this rose which the spell-breather had given him

Fear overmastered the foe and he gave up the ghost.

That one by treatment expelled the poison from his body,

While this one died of a rose from fear.”

An incident which happened to the army led by Mark Antony against the

Parthians, and described by Plutarch, is said to have been caused by

aconite. At one time during the expedition, the soldiers, being very

short of provisions, sought for roots and pot-herbs and met one that

brought on madness and death. “The eater immediately lost all memory and

would busy himself in turning over every stone he met with as if on some

important pursuit. The camp was full of unhappy men digging up and

removing stones, till at last they were carried off by bilious

vomiting.” Whole numbers, says Plutarch, perished, and the Parthians

still continued to harass them. Antony is said to have frequently

exclaimed: “Oh! the ten thousand!” alluding to the army which Xenophon

led in retreat both a longer way and through more numerous conflicts and

yet led in safety.

There is a story told of Alexander the Great that after crossing the

Cydenus, he was seized with a fever and was warned by Parmenio in a

letter not to take the medicine which his physician offered to him for

fear of poison. The physician’s name was Philip, and Alexander so

trusted him that he gave him the letter to read, scanning his face

meanwhile. The calm air of the physician satisfied the ailing conqueror

and assured him that he might safely drink the potion.

The death of Alexander the Great, like that of many other monarchs, is

ascribed by some historians to poison, but from Littré’s investigations

it would appear that the great Emperor, debilitated by his drinking

habits, contracted malarial fever in the marshes round Babylon and died

after an illness of eleven days.

In India and the Far East, poisons have been used from very early times,

not only for the destruction of human life, but also for destroying

animals; arsenic, aconite, opium and many other poisonous mineral and

vegetable substances being employed for the purpose.

The Hindus have many curious traditions concerning poisons, and like the

Western nations attribute to some the property of causing a lingering

death, which can be controlled by the will of the poisoner. The

knowledge of the substances employed is guarded with great secrecy and

even now they are not fully known. Blyth mentions a mysterious substance

known in India, called _Mucor phycomyces_, which is said to be a species

of fungus. When the spores are administered in warm water they are said

to attach themselves to the throat and speedily develop and grow, with

the result that in a few weeks the respiratory organs are attacked and

the victim is rapidly carried off as if by a fatal disease. Nine active

or virulent poisonous substances are mentioned by the ancient writers on

Hindu medicine. Some of them are at present still unidentified, while

others, there is little doubt, are varieties of aconite, also opium,

ganja (_Cannabis indica_), datura stramonium, the roots of _Nerium

odorum_, and _Gloriosa superba_, the milky juices of _Calatropis

gigantea_ and _Euphorbia neriifolia_, white arsenic, orpiment and the

poison venom from snakes.

Most of the early Sanscrit MSS. are written on paper prepared with

orpiment to preserve them from the ravages of insects. Three varieties

of datura yield atropine, a powerful poison. These plants were

frequently employed in India for putting a sudden end to domestic

quarrels, and to this practice may be traced the origin of the custom of

“Suttee,” or widow-burning, as the Brahmins found from experience that

by making a wife’s life co-terminous with the husband’s, the average

husband lived considerably longer. It is worthy of note that the diamond

was celebrated as a medicinal agent by the Hindus, who prepared it by

roasting it seven times and then reducing it to powder. It was given in

doses of one grain as a powerful tonic.

Both the Chinese and Japanese, from ancient times down to the present

day, have paid a great deal of attention to the study of poisons. From

an early period the Chinese are said to have used gold leaf for suicidal

purposes, and at the present time when a high official puts an end to

his life it is officially announced that he has “taken gold leaf.”

At the time of the death of the Emperor Kwang Su, the cause of which was

enveloped in mystery, it was rumoured that he did not die from natural

causes, but committed suicide by request. For some time previous to his

death, it is said that the Emperor had led a miserable existence and was

simply a ruler in name. The Dowager-Empress, Tzu Hsi, had resolved that

her nephew should precede her to the tomb. She therefore convoked the

Grand Council and as a result of this conclave it was announced that

Kwang Su was dangerously ill from heart disease, but the offers of the

foreign Legations to send their medical officers were firmly declined.

According to the story “at ten o’clock next morning the Chief Eunuch,

with two confidential attendants, entered the Little Palace where the

Emperor was confined, and after having ordered everybody out of the room

he declared to Kwang Su that the Empress was dying, and that it was

needful for him to predecease her.

“He then deposited on a table, pills of opium, a packet of gold leaf,

and some yellow silk plaited cord, promising to return in three hours’

time. If he found that neither the opium nor the gold leaf had been used

it would be his painful duty to call upon the two assistants to strangle

him with the silken cord. Meanwhile, the two executioners would watch

the door of the room. It should be explained that a piece of fine

gold-leaf is placed over the lips, and, the breath being deeply drawn,

it is inhaled and obstructs the glottis, causing immediate suffocation.”

When the Chief Eunuch returned at one o’clock, he found the opium pills

had disappeared and Kwang Su was stretched unconscious on his couch, but

still breathing. It was stated that he died at five o’clock, and the

three-year-old Pou Yi was at once brought to the Imperial Palace and

proclaimed Emperor.

The Japanese are said to import from China certain powerful poisons

prepared by the Chinese medicine-men, the secret of which is only known

to them. They are thought to be a mixture of both animal and mineral

substances which have a very deadly effect, though their exact

composition is yet undetermined.

Poison mysteries in history, romance and crime · 第 2 / 28 章