A SELECTION FROM THE DISCOURSES OF EPICTETUS.

OF THE THINGS WHICH ARE IN OUR POWER AND NOT IN OUR POWER.—Of all the

faculties (except that which I shall soon mention), you will find not

one which is capable of contemplating itself, and, consequently, not

capable either of approving or disapproving. How far does the grammatic

art possess the contemplating power? As far as forming a judgment about

what is written and spoken. And how far music? As far as judging about

melody. Does either of them then contemplate itself? By no means. But

when you must write something to your friend, grammar will tell you

what words you should write; but whether you should write or not,

grammar will not tell you. And so it is with music as to musical

sounds; but whether you should sing at the present time and play on the

lute, or do neither, music will not tell you. What faculty then will

tell you? That which contemplates both itself and all other things. And

what is this faculty? The rational faculty; for this is the only

faculty that we have received which examines itself, what it is, and

what power it has, and what is the value of this gift, and examines all

other faculties: for what else is there which tells us that golden

things are beautiful, for they do not say so themselves? Evidently it

is the faculty which is capable of judging of appearances. What else

judges of music, grammar, and the other faculties, proves their uses,

and points out the occasions for using them? Nothing else.

What then should a man have in readiness in such circumstances? What

else than this? What is mine, and what is not mine; and what is

permitted to me, and what is not permitted to me. I must die. Must I

then die lamenting? I must be put in chains. Must I then also lament? I

must go into exile. Does any man then hinder me from going with smiles

and cheerfulness and contentment? Tell me the secret which you possess.

I will not, for this is in my power. But I will put you in chains. Man,

what are you talking about? Me, in chains? You may fetter my leg, but

my will not even Zeus himself can overpower. I will throw you into

prison. My poor body, you mean. I will cut your head off. When then

have I told you that my head alone cannot be cut off? These are the

things which philosophers should meditate on, which they should write

daily, in which they should exercise themselves.

What then did Agrippinus say? He said, “I am not a hindrance to

myself.” When it was reported to him that his trial was going on in the

Senate, he said: “I hope it may turn out well; but it is the fifth hour

of the day”—this was the time when he was used to exercise himself and

then take the cold bath,—“let us go and take our exercise.” After he

had taken his exercise, one comes and tells him, “You have been

condemned.” “To banishment,” he replies, “or to death?” “To

banishment.” “What about my property?” “It is not taken from you.” “Let

us go to Aricia then,” he said, “and dine.”

HOW A MAN ON EVERY OCCASION CAN MAINTAIN HIS PROPER CHARACTER.—To the

rational animal only is the irrational intolerable; but that which is

rational is tolerable. Blows are not naturally intolerable. How is

that? See how the Lacedaemonians endure whipping when they have learned

that whipping is consistent with reason. To hang yourself is not

intolerable. When then you have the opinion that it is rational, you go

and hang yourself. In short, if we observe, we shall find that the

animal man is pained by nothing so much as by that which is irrational;

and, on the contrary, attracted to nothing so much as to that which is

rational.

Only consider at what price you sell your own will: if for no other

reason, at least for this, that you sell it not for a small sum. But

that which is great and superior perhaps belongs to Socrates and such

as are like him. Why then, if we are naturally such, are not a very

great number of us like him? Is it true then that all horses become

swift, that all dogs are skilled in tracking footprints? What then,

since I am naturally dull, shall I, for this reason, take no pains? I

hope not. Epictetus is not superior to Socrates; but if he is not

inferior, this is enough for me; for I shall never be a Milo, and yet I

do not neglect my body; nor shall I be a Croesus, and yet I do not

neglect my property; nor, in a word, do we neglect looking after

anything because we despair of reaching the highest degree.

HOW A MAN SHOULD PROCEED FROM THE PRINCIPLE OF GOD BEING THE FATHER OF

ALL MEN TO THE REST.—If a man should be able to assent to this doctrine

as he ought, that we are all sprung from God in an especial manner, and

that God is the father both of men and of gods, I suppose that he would

never have any ignoble or mean thoughts about himself. But if Cæsar

(the emperor) should adopt you, no one could endure your arrogance; and

if you know that you are the son of Zeus, will you not be elated? Yet

we do not so; but since these two things are mingled in the generation

of man, body in common with the animals, and reason and intelligence in

common with the gods, many incline to this kinship, which is miserable

and mortal; and some few to that which is divine and happy. Since then

it is of necessity that every man uses everything according to the

opinion which he has about it, those, the few, who think that they are

formed for fidelity and modesty and a sure use of appearances have no

mean or ignoble thoughts about themselves; but with the many it is

quite the contrary. For they say, What am I? A poor, miserable man,

with my wretched bit of flesh. Wretched, indeed; but you possess

something better than your bit of flesh. Why then do you neglect that

which is better, and why do you attach yourself to this?

Through this kinship with the flesh, some of us inclining to it become

like wolves, faithless and treacherous and mischievous; some become

like lions, savage and bestial and untamed; but the greater part of us

become foxes, and other worse animals. For what else is a slanderer and

malignant man than a fox, or some other more wretched and meaner

animal? See then and take care that you do not become some one of these

miserable things.

OF PROGRESS OR IMPROVEMENT.—He who is making progress, having learned

from philosophers that desire means the desire of good things, and

aversion means aversion from bad things; having learned too that

happiness and tranquillity are not attainable by man otherwise than by

not failing to obtain what he desires, and not falling into that which

he would avoid; such a man takes from himself desire altogether and

confers it, but he employs his aversion only on things which are

dependent on his will. For if he attempts to avoid anything independent

of his will, he knows that sometimes he will fall in with something

which he wishes to avoid, and he will be unhappy. Now if virtue

promises good fortune and tranquillity and happiness, certainly also

the progress towards virtue is progress towards each of these things.

For it is always true that to whatever point the perfecting of anything

leads us, progress is an approach towards this point.

How then do we admit that virtue is such as I have said, and yet seek

progress in other things and make a display of it? What is the product

of virtue? Tranquillity. Who then makes improvement? Is it he who has

read many books of Chrysippus? But does virtue consist in having

understood Chrysippus? If this is so, progress is clearly nothing else

than knowing a great deal of Chrysippus. But now we admit that virtue

produces one thing, and we declare that approaching near to it is

another thing, namely, progress or improvement. Such a person, says

one, is already able to read Chrysippus by himself. Indeed, sir, you

are making great progress. What kind of progress? But why do you mock

the man? Why do you draw him away from the perception of his own

misfortunes? Will you not show him the effect of virtue that he may

learn where to look for improvement? Seek it there, wretch, where your

work lies. And where is your work? In desire and in aversion, that you

may not be disappointed in your desire, and that you may not fall into

that which you would avoid; in your pursuit and avoiding, that you

commit no error; in assent and suspension of assent, that you be not

deceived. The first things, and the most necessary are those which I

have named. But if with trembling and lamentation you seek not to fall

into that which you avoid, tell me how you are improving.

Do you then show me your improvement in these things? If I were talking

to an athlete, I should say, Show me your shoulders; and then he might

say, Here are my Halteres. You and your Halteres look to that. I should

reply, I wish to see the effect of the Halteres. So, when you say: Take

the treatise on the active powers ([Greek: hormea]), and see how I have

studied it, I reply: Slave, I am not inquiring about this, but how you

exercise pursuit and avoidance, desire and aversion, how you design and

purpose and prepare yourself, whether conformably to nature or not. If

conformably, give me evidence of it, and I will say that you are making

progress; but if not conformably, be gone, and not only expound your

books, but write such books yourself; and what will you gain by it? Do

you not know that the whole book costs only five denarii? Does then the

expounder seem to be worth more than five denarii? Never then look for

the matter itself in one place, and progress towards it in another.

Where then is progress? If any of you, withdrawing himself from

externals, turns to his own will ([Greek: proairesis]) to exercise it

and to improve it by labor, so as to make it conformable to nature,

elevated, free, unrestrained, unimpeded, faithful, modest; and if he

has learned that he who desires or avoids the things which are not in

his power can neither be faithful nor free, but of necessity he must

change with them and be tossed about with them as in a tempest, and of

necessity must subject himself to others who have the power to procure

or prevent what lie desires or would avoid; finally, when he rises in

the morning, if he observes and keeps these rules, bathes as a man of

fidelity, eats as a modest man; in like manner, if in every matter that

occurs he works out his chief principles ([Greek: ta proaegoumena]) as

the runner does with reference to running, and the trainer of the voice

with reference to the voice—this is the man who truly makes progress,

and this is the man who has not travelled in vain. But if he has

strained his efforts to the practice of reading books, and labors only

at this, and has travelled for this, I tell him to return home

immediately, and not to neglect his affairs there; for this for which

he has travelled is nothing. But the other thing is something, to study

how a man can rid his life of lamentation and groaning, and saying, Woe

to me, and wretched that I am, and to rid it also of misfortune and

disappointment, and to learn what death is, and exile, and prison, and

poison, that he may be able to say when he is in fetters, Dear Crito,

if it is the will of the gods that it be so, let it be so; and not to

say, Wretched am I, an old man: have I kept my gray hairs for this? Who

is it that speaks thus? Do you think that I shall name some man of no

repute and of low condition? Does not Priam say this? Does not Oedipus

say this? Nay, all kings say it! For what else is tragedy than the

perturbations ([Greek: pathae]) of men who value externals exhibited in

this kind of poetry? But if a man must learn by fiction that no

external things which are independent of the will concern us, for my

part I should like this fiction, by the aid of which I should live

happily and undisturbed. But you must consider for yourselves what you

wish.

What then does Chrysippus teach us? The reply is, to know that these

things are not false, from which happiness comes and tranquillity

arises. Take my books, and you will learn how true and conformable to

nature are the things which make me free from perturbations. O great

good fortune! O the great benefactor who points out the way! To

Triptolemus all men have erected temples and altars, because he gave us

food by cultivation; but to him who discovered truth and brought it to

light and communicated it to all, not the truth which shows us how to

live, but how to live well, who of you for this reason has built an

altar, or a temple, or has dedicated a statue, or who worships God for

this? Because the gods have given the vine, or wheat, we sacrifice to

them; but because they have produced in the human mind that fruit by

which they designed to show us the truth which relates to happiness,

shall we not thank God for this?

AGAINST THE ACADEMICS.—If a man, said Epictetus, opposes evident

truths, it is not easy to find arguments by which we shall make him

change his opinion. But this does not arise either from the man’s

strength or the teacher’s weakness; for when the man, though he has

been confuted, is hardened like a stone, how shall we then be able to

deal with him by argument?

Now there are two kinds of hardening, one of the understanding, the

other of the sense of shame, when a man is resolved not to assent to

what is manifest nor to desist from contradictions. Most of us are

afraid of mortification of the body, and would contrive all means to

avoid such a thing, but we care not about the soul’s mortification. And

indeed with regard to the soul, if a man be in such a state as not to

apprehend anything, or understand at all, we think that he is in a bad

condition; but if the sense of shame and modesty are deadened, this we

call even power (or strength).

OF PROVIDENCE.—From everything, which is or happens in the world, it is

easy to praise Providence, if a man possesses these two qualities: the

faculty of seeing what belongs and happens to all persons and things,

and a grateful disposition. If he does not possess these two qualities,

one man will not see the use of things which are and which happen:

another will not be thankful for them, even if he does know them. If

God had made colors, but had not made the faculty of seeing them, what

would have been their use? None at all. On the other hand, if he had

made the faculty of vision, but had not made objects such as to fall

under the faculty, what in that case also would have been the use of

it? None at all. Well, suppose that he had made both, but had not made

light? In that case, also, they would have been of no use. Who is it

then who has fitted this to that and that to this?

What, then, are these things done in us only? Many, indeed, in us only,

of which the rational animal had peculiar need; but you will find many

common to us with irrational animals. Do they then understand what is

done? By no means. For use is one thing, and understanding is another;

God had need of irrational animals to make use of appearances, but of

us to understand the use of appearances. It is therefore enough for

them to eat and to drink, and to copulate, and to do all the other

things which they severally do. But for us, to whom he has given also

the intellectual faculty, these things are not sufficient; for unless

we act in a proper and orderly manner, and conformably to the nature

and constitution of each thing, we shall never attain our true end. For

where the constitutions of living beings are different, there also the

acts and the ends are different. In those animals then whose

constitution is adapted only to use, use alone is enough; but in an

animal (man), which has also the power of understanding the use, unless

there be the due exercise of the understanding, he will never attain

his proper end. Well then God constitutes every animal, one to be

eaten, another to serve for agriculture, another to supply cheese, and

another for some like use; for which purposes what need is there to

understand appearances and to be able to distinguish them? But God has

introduced man to be a spectator of God and of his works; and not only

a spectator of them, but an interpreter. For this reason it is shameful

for man to begin and to end where irrational animals do; but rather he

ought to begin where they begin, and to end where nature ends in us;

and nature ends in contemplation and understanding, and in a way of

life conformable to nature. Take care then not to die without having

been spectators of these things.

But you take a journey to Olympia to see the work of Phidias, and all

of you think it a misfortune to die without having seen such things.

But when there is no need to take a journey, and where a man is, there

he has the works (of God) before him, will you not desire to see and

understand them? Will you not perceive either what you are, or what you

were born for, or what this is for which you have received the faculty

of sight? But you may say, There are some things disagreeable and

troublesome in life. And are there none at Olympia? Are you not

scorched? Are you not pressed by a crowd? Are you not without

comfortable means of bathing? Are you not wet when it rains? Have you

not abundance of noise, clamor, and other disagreeable things? But I

suppose that setting all these things off against the magnificence of

the spectacle, you bear and endure. Well then and have you not received

faculties by which you will be able to bear all that happens? Have you

not received greatness of soul? Have you not received manliness? Have

you not received endurance? And why do I trouble myself about anything

that can happen if I possess greatness of soul? What shall distract my

mind, or disturb me, or appear painful? Shall I not use the power for

the purposes for which I received it, and shall I grieve and lament

over what happens?

Come, then, do you also having observed these things look to the

faculties which you have, and when you have looked at them, say: Bring

now, O Zeus, any difficulty that thou pleasest, for I have means given

to me by thee and powers for honoring myself through the things which

happen. You do not so; but you sit still, trembling for fear that some

things will happen, and weeping, and lamenting, and groaning for what

does happen; and then you blame the gods. For what is the consequence

of such meanness of spirit but impiety? And yet God has not only given

us these faculties, by which we shall be able to bear everything that

happens without being depressed or broken by it; but, like a good king

and a true father, He has given us these faculties free from hindrance,

subject to no compulsion, unimpeded, and has put them entirely in our

own power, without even having reserved to Himself any power of

hindering or impeding. You, who have received these powers free and as

your own, use them not; you do not even see what you have received, and

from whom; some of you being blinded to the giver, and not even

acknowledging your benefactor, and others, through meanness of spirit,

betaking yourselves to fault-finding and making charges against God.

Yet I will show to you that you have powers and means for greatness of

soul and manliness; but what powers you have for finding fault making

accusations, do you show me.

HOW FROM THE FACT THAT WE ARE AKIN TO GOD A MAN MAY PROCEED TO THE

CONSEQUENCES.—I indeed think that the old man ought to be sitting here,

not to contrive how you may have no mean thoughts nor mean and ignoble

talk about yourselves, but to take care that there be not among us any

young men of such a mind, that when they have recognized their kinship

to God, and that we are fettered by these bonds, the body, I mean, and

its possessions, and whatever else on account of them is necessary to

us for the economy and commerce of life, they should intend to throw

off these things as if they were burdens painful and intolerable, and

to depart to their kinsmen. But this is the labor that your teacher and

instructor ought to be employed upon, if he really were what he should

be. You should come to him and say: Epictetus, we can no longer endure

being bound to this poor body, and feeding it, and giving it drink and

rest, and cleaning it, and for the sake of the body complying with the

wishes of these and of those. Are not these things indifferent and

nothing to us; and is not death no evil? And are we not in a manner

kinsmen of God, and did we not come from him? Allow us to depart to the

place from which we came; allow us to be released at last from these

bonds by which we are bound and weighed down. Here there are robbers

and thieves and courts of justice, and those who are named tyrants, and

think that they have some power over us by means of the body and its

possessions. Permit us to show them that they have no power over any

man. And I on my part would say: Friends, wait for God: when he shall

give the signal and release you from this service, then go to him; but

for the present endure to dwell in this place where he has put you.

Short indeed is this time of your dwelling here, and easy to bear for

those who are so disposed; for what tyrant, or what thief, or what

courts of justice are formidable to those who have thus considered as

things of no value the body and the possessions of the body? Wait then,

do not depart without a reason.

OF CONTENTMENT.—With respect to gods, there are some who say that a

divine being does not exist; others say that it exists, but is inactive

and careless, and takes no forethought about anything; a third class

say that such a being exists and exercises forethought, but only about

great things and heavenly things, and about nothing on the earth; a

fourth class say that a divine being exercises forethought both about

things on the earth and heavenly things, but in a general way only, and

not about things severally. There is a fifth class to whom Ulysses and

Socrates belong, who say:

A Selection from the Discourses of Epictetus with the Encheiridion · 第 6 / 62 题