Saint William of Perth was for long the chief glory and principal source

of income to the Priory and monks of Rochester. He was a wealthy Scottish

baker who, having amassed a fortune, probably both by overcharging for his

bread and in the giving of short weight, determined to go on pilgrimage.

He must have been a superlative rogue and cheat, for nothing less than a

pilgrimage to Jerusalem would serve his purpose. However, he never reached

the Holy City; for, having arrived at Rochester in 1201, and having

contributed magnificently to the shrines there, he was murdered by his

guide while journeying hence to Canterbury. At least, so runs the story,

but I believe the monks themselves did the deed. They were exceedingly

poor, having by some unexplained excesses squandered the wealth which the

once highly venerated bones of Saint Paulinus had brought them, and they

had already melted down the silver shrine of that Saint to pay their way

withal. The competition of Canterbury, too, was killing, and the fame of

Paulinus paled before that of Becket; and so they probably conceived the

idea of murdering the rich pilgrim in order to obtain at once a

remunerative martyr of their own, and to put themselves in funds with the

wealth he carried about with him. If the Dean and Chapter of Rochester

could in after years wilfully appropriate to their own uses an annual

income of several thousands of pounds intended for educational purposes,

and become thus common thieves and peculators, what scruples could be

supposed to hinder the monks of the dark ages from becoming murderers?

The south-east transept has a curious mural monument to Richard Watts;

with a coloured and very life-like portrait-bust "starting out of it like

a ship's figure-head," and underneath is a brass to the memory of Charles

Dickens. On the eastern wall is a medallion profile of Joseph Maas, the

singer, vulgar and amateurish beyond the power of words to tell.

[Sidenote: ROCHESTER CASTLE]

Rochester Cathedral is not rich in decorative carvings, but its two

enriched doorways are famous. One is the beautiful Norman west door, of

five receding arches, carved over with a profusion of characteristic

Norman scrolls; interlacing patterns; semi-human and half-supernatural

figures of appalling build and ferocious expression; and flanked by two

statues supposed to represent Henry the First and Queen Matilda. The

other is the unsurpassed Decorated doorway of the Chapter House, whose

sculptured emblematic figures of the Church, and of angels, priests and

bishops are at the other, and more beautiful, end of decorative art.

Having seen all these things, the verger who has hitherto shepherded his

flock of visitors through these upper regions, takes them down a flight of

stone stairs and unlocks the door of the crypt. An ancient and mouldy

smell rushes up from the dark labyrinth of pillars and indistinct arches,

and the ladies of the party pretend to be terrified. But they might just

as well be afraid of a coal-cellar, which is generally darker and dirtier,

for neither bones nor coffins, nor anything more awful than a few

shattered fragments of architectural carvings are to be seen. The usual

legends current in most old places would have us believe that a

subterraneous passage runs between Castle and Cathedral, and certainly

they are sufficiently near one another for such a communication to have

been made; but these legends have never been resolved into fact. Near

neighbours they are, and the Cathedral has suffered not a little at

different times from this close proximity. For when Rufus besieged the

Castle, and when, in 1215 and 1264, it was closely invested for

respectively three months and a week, the Cathedral had its share of the

violent doings that resulted in the Keep being undermined and the wooden

bridge of Rochester burned. Gundulf's Tower had not been completed when

that mighty master-builder died, and although it is generally ascribed to

him, it seems really to have been finished under the supervision of an

inexperienced architect employed by that Archbishop William de Corbeil to

whom and his successors of Canterbury Henry the Second granted "the

perpetual charge and constableship of the Castle of Rochester." This

prelate died in 1139, and the irony of circumstances decreed that only one

other of the Archbishops to whom the "perpetual constableship" was

granted should ever exercise the rights and privileges of the gift. This

was Stephen Langton. The Castle was found to be too important in those

times for it to be held by any other than the King, and so to the Crown it

reverted. Now that it is ruined and open to the sky the Mayors of

Rochester are _ex officio_ constables, and they wear a sword on grand

occasions as an outward and visible sign of their dignity.

Rochester Keep rises to a height of a hundred and twenty-five feet. Walls

ranging from ten to twelve feet in thickness attest its old-time strength,

and the ornamentation both of the State apartments, and of the Chapel on

the third floor, betokens a considerable display made in those far-off

times. But although one of the loftiest Norman keeps extant; though strong

and internally ornate, it seems to have been built by a copyist of Gundulf

who perhaps had neither his resources nor his love of a neat and

workmanlike finish. Whatever the cause, certain it is that here we miss

the close-jointed external ashlar that we are accustomed to see in such

grand contemporary Norman keeps as those of Castle Hedingham and

Scarborough. Ashlaring has been only sparingly used for quoins and

dressings of door- and window-openings, and the exterior of this keep

chiefly shows a broad expanse of roughly set Kentish rag-stone. The

result, although it does not commend itself architecturally, is at least

bold and rugged and altogether satisfying to the artist.

There is, according to a legend of unknown age, a vast treasure buried

beneath the ground here; concealed in some mysterious crypt whose door may

only by rarest chance be found. From this door hangs a Hand of Glory, and

not until the Hand is extinguished, finger by finger, can it be forced

open. Absolute silence is to be observed by the adventurer while

extinguishing the Blazing Hand, or the mystic power is broken. There was

once, says a sequel to the foregoing legend, a bold and fortunate spirit

who had by some means discovered this hidden door. He extinguished the

guardian Hand, all but the thumb; and, proceeding to snuff this out also,

he uttered an incautious exclamation of triumph. The fingers instantly

burst into flame again, and the man was dashed senseless to the ground;

nor was he ever again so fortunate as to recover the spot.

XXIII

Rochester has had many Royal and distinguished visitors, and many of them

have left traces of their sojourn in more or less quaint, instructive, and

amusing accounts. When Edward the First came here in 1300, he gave seven

shillings to the Priory for the shrine of Saint William, and twelve

shillings compensation to one Richard Lamberd whose horse, hired for the

King's service, was blown over Rochester Bridge into the Medway and

drowned. On his return from Canterbury, nine days later, the King flung

his shillings about in quite a reckless manner; giving seven shillings

each for the shrines of Saints Ithamar and Paulinus; while bang went

twenty-one other shillings at Chatham, offered to the image of the Blessed

Mary by the King, the Queen, and the Prince of Wales.

[Sidenote: ROCHESTER BRIDGE]

The Bridge at Rochester, over which that unfortunate horse was blown, was

at this time a crazy structure of wood, and so dangerous that most folks

preferred crossing the Medway by boat. One unfortunate minstrel was blown

into the water just as he reached the middle, and he went floating down

the stream harping the praises of Our Lady upon his harp, and calling out

for her help at the same time _in English_, as the chronicler remarks--and

this was his English:--

Help usvyf, help usvyf,

Oiyer me--I forga mi lyf.

By "usvyf" he meant "wife." "Help us, wife," which strikes us as being

extremely familiar.

The Holy Mother, notwithstanding this horrid jargon, was pleased to save

him, and this pious "Harpur a Roucestre" landed about a league below the

city, making his way forthwith to a church to offer up thanks, and

followed by an immense crowd who had been watching the proceedings without

attempting to save him, which is ever the way of crowds.

[Illustration: ROCHESTER CASTLE AND THE MEDWAY.]

Fourteen years later, the Queen of Robert Bruce was a State prisoner in

Rochester Castle, with her sister and daughter, and here they remained

until Bannockburn altered the complexion of affairs. King John of France,

too, appears here, and in a grateful mood, for he was going back to his

kingdom, and so, to please the saints, made an offering of forty crowns

(valued at L6 13_s._ 4_d._) at the Cathedral, departing for "Stiborne,"

and resting the night at Ospringe. Sigismund, Emperor of Germany, passed

through "Rotschetter" in 1416, with a retinue of a thousand knights, on a

visit to Henry the Fifth, and Henry the Seventh was here in 1492, 1494,

and 1498, crossing over from Strood in a ferry-boat for which he paid L2,

an expense which would have been quite unnecessary had the authorities

kept the Bridge (then of stone, and about a century old) in decent repair.

A few months later than his last visit, the King sent the Mayor of the

town L5 toward its restoration, for funds were low, and the

indulgences--to say nothing of the forty days' remittances from Purgatory

for all manner of sins--offered by Archbishop Morton to any one who would

give towards the work, were but little in request.

Charles the Fifth, Emperor of Germany, was the next considerable personage

here, and of how great a consideration he was may be gathered from the

fact that he came up the road from Dover with a train of two thousand

attendants. He and Henry the Eighth, who had gone down to Dover to meet

him, stayed at Rochester on the night of Sunday, June 1, 1522, and went on

to Gravesend the following day. Eighteen years later, the King, already a

much-married man, came here to have a private view of his new matrimonial

venture.

[Sidenote: HENRY MEETS ANNE]

Two accounts are given of this meeting of Henry the Eighth and Anne of

Cleves. They agree neither with themselves nor with that other account in

which the King is made to call her a "Flanders mare":--"As she passed

toward Rochester," writes Hall, the Chronicler, "on New Yeres Even, on

Reynam Down, met her the Duke of Norffolke, and the Lord Dacre of the

South, and the Lord Mountjoye, with a gret company of Knyghtes and

Esquiers of Norffolke and Suffolke, and the Barons of thxchequer, (_sic_)

all in coates of velvet with chaynes of golde, which brought her to

Rochester, where she lay in the Palace all New Yeres Day. On which day

the Kyng, which sore desyred to see her Grace, accompanyed with no more

than viii persons of his prevy chaumbre, and both he and thei all

aparelled in marble coates, prevely came to Rochester, and sodainly came

to her presence, which therwith was sumwhat astonied; but after he had

spoken and welcomed her, she with most gracious and lovyng countenance and

behavior him received and welcomed on her knees, whom he gently toke up

and kyssed; and all that afternoone commoned and devised with her"

(whatever that may mean), "and that night supped with her, and the next

day he departed to Grenewich and she came to Dartford." Now hear how

different a complexion Stow puts upon this meeting, and then tell me what

you think of the difficulties of history-writing:--

"The King being ascertained of her arivall and approch, was wonderfull

desirous to see her, of whom hee had heard so great commendations, and

thereupon hee came very privately to Rochester, where hee tooke the first

view of her; and when he had well beheld her, hee was so marvelously

astonished that hee knew not well what to doe or say. Hee brought with him

divers things, which hee meant to present her with his owne hands, that is

to say, a partlet, a mufler" (Indian shawls had not yet been introduced),

"a cup, and other things; but being sodainly quite discouraged and amazed

with her presence, his mind changed, and hee delivered them unto Sir

Anthony Browne to give them unto her, but with as small show of Kingly

kindness as might be. The King being sore vexed with the sight of her,

began to utter his heart's griefe unto divers: amongst whom hee said unto

the Lord Admirall, 'How like you this woman? Doe you think her so

personable, faire, and beautifull as report hath beene made unto mee of

her--I pray you tell me true?'"

Whereupon the Lord Admiral discreetly replied no word of dispraise,

because people with opinions had in those days an excellent chance of

losing their heads; merely remarking that she appeared to have a brown

complexion rather than the fair one that had been represented to his

Majesty.

"Alas!" replied the King, "whom shall men--to say nothing of kings--trust?

I promise you I see no such thing in her as hath been shewed to me of her,

either by pictures or report, and am ashamed that men have praised her as

they have done; and I like her not." Which, of course, was final.

Queen Elizabeth, of course, was here, not once but thrice, and on her

first visit she stayed at the "Crown" inn, "which," says Francis Thynne,

"is the only place to intertaine Princes comming thither." It was, indeed,

the place where her father stayed, and where, according to one account,

Anne of Cleves lodged; and was the scene of the inimitable colloquy

between the carriers in _Henry the Fourth_, just previous to the robbery

on Gad's Hill. The "Crown," of course, is gone now, and an ugly building,

bearing the same sign, but dating only from 1863, stands on its site.

[Sidenote: "ROGUES AND PROCTORS"]

On the last day of her visit, the queen was entertained by "that

charitable man but withal most determined enemy to Rogues and Proctors,"

Master Richard Watts, whose almshouse for the lodgment of six poor

travellers bears still upon its front the evidence of his aversions.

Controversy has long raged around the term "proctor," and the victory

seems to rest with those who declare that the class thus excluded from the

benefits of Master Watts' charity was that of the "procurators" who were

licensed by the Pope to go through the country collecting "Peter's pence";

but I have my own idea on that point, and I believe that the "proctors"

referred to were not papists, but either "proctors that go up and downe

with counterfeit licences, cosiners, and suche as go about the countrey

using unlawfull games"; or the "proctors" especially and particularly

mentioned in the Statute Edw. VI. c. 3, s. 19, licensed to collect alms

for the lepers who at that time were still numerous in England. These

privileged beggars were deprived of their immunity from arrest by the "Act

for Punishment of Rogues, Vagabonds, and Sturdie Beggars" (39 Eliz. c. 4),

wherein "all persons that be, or utter themselves to be _Proctors_,

procurers, patent gatherers, or collectors for gaols, prisons, or

hospitals"[5] are, together with "all Fencers, Bearewards, common players

of Interludes, and Minstrels" to be adjudged Rogues and Vagabonds. Now it

is sufficiently remarkable that this Act was passed (perhaps with the

strenuous help of Master Watts, who was a Member of Parliament, and who we

see hated proctors so ardently) at about the time when the "Six Poor

Travellers" was built, and the reasons for refusing admission either to a

true Proctor of a lazar-house, or to a pretended one, must be sufficiently

obvious.

Master Watts entertained the Queen at his house on Boley (? Beaulieu) Hill

on the last day of her visit, and when that courtly man apologised for the

"poor cottage" (he didn't mean it, but 'twas the custom so to do) Her

Majesty is supposed to have graciously answered "Satis," and so Satis

House it remained, and the hideous building that now stands upon its site

still bears, grotesquely enough, its name.

Quite a train of miscellaneous Royalties and celebrities came here after

Elizabeth's second visit in 1582; the Duke of Sully; James the First, who

angered the seafaring population because he didn't care for the ships,

loved hunting, and was afraid of the cannon--James the First again, with

Christian the Fourth of Denmark and Prince Henry; Prince Henry by himself

in 1611; Frederick, Elector Palatine of Bohemia; Charles the First on two

occasions, on the second of which "the trane-bands ... scarmished in

warlike manner to His Majesties great content"; the French Ambassador, in

1641, who thought Rochester was chiefly observable on account of its

Bridge "furnished with high railings, that drunkards, not uncommon here,

may not mix water with their wine"; and nineteen years later, Charles the

Second, on his "glorious and never-to-be-forgotten Restoracion."

How Charles was feted here, and how he stayed at the beautiful old place

that has taken the name of "Restoration House" from this visit, these

pages cannot tell; the story is too long.

[Sidenote: PEPYS]

And here, in the name of all that's lewd and scandal-mongering, comes old

Pepys again. It is no use trying to keep him out of one's pages: suppress

him at one place, and he recurs unfailingly at another, with a worse

record than before. I discreetly "sat on" him at Deptford, but here he is

at Rochester, "goin' on hawful," to quote one of Dickens' characters (I

forget which, and the society of so many Kings and Queens on the Dover

Road is so fatiguing that I have neither sufficient time nor energy to

inquire).

Well then, it was in 1667[6] that Mr. Samuel Pepys came here, and, putting

up at the "White Hart," strolled into the Cathedral, more intent upon the

architecture than the doctrine, it would seem; for when service began he

walked out into the fields, and there "saw Sir F. Clark's pretty seat."

And so "into the Cherry Garden, and here he met with a young, plain, silly

shopkeeper and his wife, a pretty young woman, and I did kiss her!" And

after this they dined, and walked in the fields together till dark, "and

so to bed," without the usual "God forgive me!" which, considering how he

had shirked the Cathedral service, and how questionable had been his

conduct in the Cherry Garden, was more needful than ever, one would think.

[Illustration: HIGH STREET, ROCHESTER: EASTGATE HOUSE.]

Twenty-one years after this date came James the Second on two hurried

visits to Rochester within a few days of one another. If he had had time,

and had been in a sufficiently calm frame of mind, he might have reflected

on the vicissitudes of Kings in general, and of his own Royal House in

particular; but being shockingly upset, and in a mortal terror lest he

should lose his head as thoroughly in a physical sense as he had already

done in a figurative way of speaking, he lost that opportunity of coolly

reviewing his position which, had it but been seized, would have led him

to return to London and stay there. It is not a little sad to reflect

that, had the gloomy and morose James not been a coward, the House of

Stuart might still have ruled England. At any rate, men did not love the

taciturn Prince of Orange and his Dutchmen so well but what they would

have gladly done without him and have taken back their King, if that King

had only shown a little more spirit and a little less of religious

bigotry. William could not but perceive that his principles and not his

person were acclaimed, and when he gave the King leave to retire to

Rochester, he both knew that James desired an opportunity to escape from

the kingdom, and hoped he would use it. And he did use the chance so

gladly given him, secretly departing from Rochester in the small hours of

a December morning, and making for Ambleteuse on the French coast in a

fishing-smack.

[Illustration: JACK IN HIS GLORY. _From a painting by Julius Caesar

Ibbetson._]

XXIV

This was the last romantic event that befell at Rochester, and it fitly

closed a stirring history.

But Chatham and Rochester, although outward romance had departed, did not

cease to be interested in naval and military affairs. Indeed, they have

grown continually greater on them.

[Sidenote: HOGARTH'S SATIRES]

It was in 1756 that the plates of _England_ and _France_ were published by

Hogarth. We were suffering then from one of those panic fears of invasion

by the French to which this country has been periodically subject, and

these efforts were consequently calculated to have a large sale. Hogarth,

of course, after his arrest for sketching at Calais, was morbidly,

vitriolically patriotic, and his work is earnest of his feelings. The

English are seen drilling in the background of the first plate, while in

front of the "Duke of Cumberland" inn a recruit is being measured, and

smiles at the caricature of the King of France which a grenadier is

painting on the wall. A long inscription proceeds from the mouth of His

Most Christian Majesty, "You take a my fine ships, you be de Pirate, you

be de Teef, me send you my grand Armies, and hang you all, Morbleu," and

he grasps a gibbet to emphasize the words. Meanwhile, a fifer plays "God

Save the King"; a soldier in the group has placed his sword across a

great cheese; and a sailor has guarded his tankard of beer with a pistol.

But see how different are things across the Channel. Outside the _Sabot

Royal_ a party of French grenadiers, lean and hungry-looking after their

poor fare of _soupe maigre_, are watching one of their number cook the

sprats he has spitted on his sword. A monk with a grin of satisfaction

feels the edge of an axe which he has taken from a cart full of racks and

other engines of torture destined towards the furnishing of a monastery at

Blackfriars in London, of which a plan is seen lying upon this heap of

ironmongery; and a file of soldiers may be seen in the distance,

reluctantly embarking for England, and spurred forward by the point of the

sergeant's halberd. Garrick wrote the patriotic verses that went with this

picture, and you may see from them how constantly Englishmen have thought

the French to be a nation of lean and hungry starvelings. That is, of

course, as absurd as the unfailing practice of French caricaturists to

whom the typical Englishman is a creature who has red hair and protruding

teeth, and says "Goddam"--

With lanthorn jaws and croaking gut,

See how the half-starv'd Frenchmen strut,

And call us English dogs;

But soon we'll teach these bragging foes,

That beef and beer give heavier blows

Than soup and roasted frogs.

The priests, inflam'd with righteous hopes,

Prepare their axes, wheels, and ropes,

To bend the stiff-neck'd sinner:

But, should they sink in coming over,

Old Nick may fish 'twixt France and Dover,

And catch a glorious dinner.

[Illustration: THE INVASION OF ENGLAND: ENGLAND. _After Hogarth._]

[Sidenote: CHATHAM]

The Dover Road: Annals of an Ancient Turnpike · 第 8 / 18 段