The books about Delhi are even more tantalising and unsatisfactory

than those which deal with Agra. Mr. Beglar's contribution to Vol. IV

of the _Archaeological Survey Reports_ is a little, but very little,

better than Mr. Carlleyle's disquisition on Agra in that volume. Sir

A. Cunningham's observations in the first and twentieth volumes of

the same series are of greater value, but are fragmentary and

imperfect, and scarcely notice at all the city of Shâhjahân.

Fergusson's criticisms, so far as they go, are of permanent

importance, though the scheme of his work did not allow him to treat

in detail of any particular section. Guide-books by Beresford Cooper,

Harcourt, and Keene, of which Keene's is the latest, and,

consequently, in some respects the best, are all extremely

unsatisfactory. Mr. H. C. Fanshawe's _Delhi Past and Present_ (John

Murray, 1902), a large, handsome work something between a guide-book

and a learned treatise, is not quite satisfying. The late Mr. Carr

Stephen, a resident of Delhi, wrote a valuable book on the

Archaeology of the city, but it has no illustrations, except a few

plans on a small scale. (8vo, Ludhiana, 1876.) A good critical,

comprehensive, well illustrated description of the remains of the

cities, said to number thirteen, all grouped together by European

writers under the name of Delhi, does not exist, and it seems

unlikely that the Panjâb Government will cause the blank to be

filled. No Government in India has such opportunities, or has done so

little, to elucidate the history of the country, as the Government of

the Panjâb. But it has shown greater interest in the matter of late.

The reorganized Archaeological Survey of India, under the capable

guidance of Sir J. H. Marshall, C.I.E., has not yet had time to do

much at Delhi beyond the work of conservation. A fourteenth Delhi is

now being built (1914).

30. _Ante_, chapter 53, [19].

31. These epistolary formulas mean no more than the similar official

phrases in English, 'Your most obedient humble servant', and the

like. The 'fortunate occurrence' of the Mutiny--for such it was, in

spite of all the blood and suffering--cut out many plague-spots from

the body politic of India. Among these the reeking palace swarm of

Delhi was not the least malignant.

32. Azraîl is the angel of death, whose duty it is to separate the

souls from the bodies of men. Isrâfîl is entrusted with the task of

blowing the last trump.

33. The resurrection, and the signs foretelling it, are described in

the _Mishkat-ul-Masâbih_, book xxiii, chapters 3 to 11. (Matthews,

vol. ii, pp. 556-620.)

34. The Hindoo 'ages' are (1) Krita, or Satya, (2) Treta, (3)

Dwâpara, (4) Kali, the present evil age. The long periods assigned to

these are merely the result of the calculations of astronomers, who

preferred integral to fractional numbers.

35. This kind of education does not now pay, and is, consequently,

going out of fashion. The Muhammadans are slowly, and rather

unwillingly, yielding to the pressure of necessity and beginning to

accept English education.

36. Imam Muhammad Ghazzâlî, who is also entitled Hujjat-ul-Islâm, is

the surname of Abu Hâmid Muhammad Zain-ud-dîn Tûsî, one of the

greatest and most celebrated Musalmân doctors, who was born A.D.

1058, and died A.D. 1111. (Beale, s.v. 'Ghazzâlî'.) The length of

these Muhammadan names is terrible. They are much mangled in the

original edition. See _ante_, chapter 53, note 10, and Blochmann

(Aîn) pp. 103, 182.

37. Khwâja Nâsir-ud-dîn Tûsî, the famous philosopher and astronomer,

the most universal scholar that Persia ever produced. Born A.D. 1201,

died A.D. 1274. (Beale.) See _ante_, loc. cit.

38. Especially the _Bûstân_ and _Gulistân_. Beale gives a list of

Sâdî's works. See _ante_, chapter 12, note 6.

39. This is a very cynical and inadequate explanation of the

prevalence of Conservative opinions among Englishmen in the East.

40. Ante, chapter 30, [6].

41. In the original edition the portrait of Akbar II is twice given,

namely, in the frontispiece of Volume I as a full-page plate, and

again as a miniature, dated 1836, in the frontispiece of Volume II.

42. The most secluded native prince of the present day could not be

guilty of this absurdity.

43. Bâbur was sixth in descent from Tîmûr, not seventh. Bâbur's

grandfather, Abu Sayyid, was great-grandson of Tîmûr. Bâbur, not

Bâbar, is the correct spelling.

44. This may be an exaggeration. The undoubted facts are sufficiently

horrible.

45. Tîmûr was a man of surpassing ability, and knew much 'else'. See

Malcolm, _History of Persia_, ed. 1859, chapter 11.

46. Tîmûr's 'historian and great eulogist' was Sharaf-ud-dîn (died

1446), whose _Zafarnâma_, or 'Book of Victories', was translated into

French by Petis de la Croix in 1722. That version was used by Gibbon

and rendered into English in 1723, Copious extracts from an

independent rendering are given in E. & D., iii, pp. 478-522. The

details do not always agree exactly with Sleeman's account.

47. The 'old city' was that of Kutb-ud-dîn and Îltutmish; the 'new

city' was that of Fîrôz Shâh, which partly coincided with the

existing city, and partly lay to the south, outside the Delhi gate.

48. In A.D. 1303.

49. Now in the Sahâranpur district.

50. This is a repetition of the statement made above. According to

_Encycl. Brit._, ed. 1910, Tîmûr returned to his capital in April not

May.

51. Bajazet, or more accurately Bayazîd I, was defeated by Tîmûr at

the battle of Angora in 1402, and died the following year. The story

of his confinement in an iron cage is discredited by modern critics,

though Gibbon (chapter 65) shows that it is supported by much good

evidence. Anatolia is a synonym for Asia Minor. It is a vague term,

the Greek equivalent of 'the Levant'.

52. Sebastê, also called Elaeusa or Ayash, was in Cilicia.

53. Otherwise called Sihôn, or Syr Daryâ.

54. Two autobiographical works, the _Malfûzât_ and the Tuzukât, are

attributed to Tîmûr and probably were composed under his direction.

The latter was translated by Major Davey (Oxford, 1783), and the

former, in part, by Major Stewart (Or. Transl. Fund, 1830). An

independent version of the portion of the _Malfûzât_ relating to

India will be found in E. & D., iii, pp. 389-477.

55. Alî Yazdî, commonly called Sharaf-ud-dîn, author of the

_Zafarnâma_ in Persian (see _ante_, chapter 68, note 46), Ibn

Arabshâh, in an Arabic work, describes Tîmûr from a hostile point of

view. (Encycl. Brit., 11th ed., s. v. 'Timûr').

56. It is impossible within the limits of a note to discuss the

problem of the origin of the gipsies. Much has been written about it,

though nothing quite satisfactory. The gipsy, or Romany, language

(_Romani chiv_, or 'tongue') certainly is closely related to, though

not derived from, the existing languages of Northern India. Some of

the forms are very archaic. A valuable English-Gipsy vocabulary

compiled by Mr. (Sir George) and Mrs. Grierson was published in _Ind.

Ant._, vols. xv, xvi (1886,1887). The author's theory does not tally

with the facts. Gipsies existed in Persia and Europe long before

Tîmûr's time. It is practically certain that they did not come

through Egypt. The article 'Gypsies' by F. H. Groome in Chambers's

_Encycl._ (1904) is good, and seems to the editor to be preferable to

Dr. Gaster's article 'Gipsies' in _Encycl. Brit._, 11th ed., 1910.

57. Before the Codes were passed (1859-1861) the criminal law

administered in India was, in the main, that of the Muhammadans, and

each judge's court had a Muhammadan law officer attached, who

pronounced a 'fatwa', or decision, intimating the law applicable to

the case, and the penalty which might be inflicted. Several examples

of these 'fatwas' will be found among the papers bound up with the

author's 'Ramaseeana'.

58. See Korân, chapter 2. [W. H. S.] The passage is the second

sentence in chapter 2. The wording, as quoted, differs slightly from

Sale's version.

59. See Korân, chapter 32. [W. H. S.]

60. Ibid., chapter 11. [W. H. S.] Sale's version, with trifling

verbal differences. The 'muftî's' reasoning has been heard in Europe.

61. See Korân, chapter 15. [W. H. S.] Sale's version, with

modifications.

62. 'This is a revelation of the most mighty, the merciful God; that

thou mayest warn a people whose fathers were not warned, and who live

in negligence. Our sentence hath justly been pronounced against the

greater part of them, wherefore they shall not believe. It shall be

equal unto them whether thou preach unto them, or do not preach unto

them; they shall not believe.' Korân, chapter 36. [W. H. S.] From

beginning of the chapter. Sale's version; a sentence being omitted

between 'believe' and 'It shall'.

63. I have never met another man so thoroughly master of the Korân as

the Muftî, and yet he had the reputation of being a very corrupt man

in his office. [W. H. S.]

64. Aleeoodeen; an unusual name; probably a misprint for Alâ-ud-dîn.

65. The 17th chapter of the Korân opens with the words, 'Praise be

unto him who transported his servant by night from the sacred temple

of Mecca to the farther temple of Jerusalem', 'from whence', as Sale

observes, 'he was carried through the seven heavens to the presence

of God, and brought back again to Mecca the same night'. The

commentators dispute whether the journey to heaven was corporeally

performed, or merely in a vision. 'But the received opinion is that

it was no vision, but that he was actually transported in the body to

his journey's end; and if any impossibility be objected, they think

it a sufficient answer to say that it might easily be effected by an

omnipotent agent.'

66. See Korân, chapter 15. [W. H. S.]

67. The Muhammadans believe that the Christians have tampered with

the Scriptures.

68. It would be difficult to give more vivid expression to the

eternal conflict between the theological and the scientific spirit.

Compare the remarks _ante_, chapter 26, note 11, on the attitude of

Hindoos towards modern science.

69. _Paradise Lost_, Book VIII. [W. H. S.] Line 167; from Raphael's

address to Adam.

CHAPTER 69

Indian Police--Its Defects--and their Cause and Remedy.

On the 26th[1] we crossed the river Jumna, over a bridge of boats,

kept up by the King of Oudh for the use of the public, though his

majesty is now connected with Delhi only by the tomb of his

ancestor;[2] and his territories are separated from the imperial city

by the two great rivers, Ganges and Jumna.

We proceeded to Farrukhnagar, about twelve miles over an execrable

road running over a flat but rugged surface of unproductive soil.[3]

India is, perhaps, the only civilized country in the world where a

great city could be approached by such a road from the largest

military Station in the empire,[4] not more than three stages

distant. After breakfast the head native police officer of the

division came to pay his respects. He talked of the dreadful murders

which used to be perpetrated in this neighbourhood by miscreants, who

found shelter in the territories of the Bêgam Samrû,[5] whither his

followers dared not hunt for them; and mentioned a case of nine

persons who had been murdered just within the boundary of our

territories about seven years before, and thrown into a dry well. He

was present at the inquest held on their bodies, and described their

appearance; and I found that they were the bodies of a news writer

from Lahore, who, with his eight companions, had been murdered by

Thugs on his way back to Rohilkhand. I had long before been made

acquainted with the circumstances of this murder and the perpetrators

had all been secured, but we wanted this link in the chain of

evidence. It had been described to me as having taken place within

the boundary of the Bêgam's territory, and I applied to her for a

report on the inquest. She declared that no bodies had been

discovered about the time mentioned; and I concluded that the

ignorance of the people of the neighbourhood was pretended, as usual

in such cases, with a view to avoid a summons to give evidence in our

courts. I referred forthwith to the magistrate of the district, and

found the report that I wanted, and thereby completed the chain of

evidence upon a very important case. The Thânadâr seemed much

surprised to find that I was so well acquainted with the

circumstances of this murder, but still more that the perpetrators

were not the poor old Bêgam's subjects, but our own.

The police officers employed on our borders find it very convenient

to trace the perpetrators of all murders and gang robberies into the

territories of native chiefs, whose subjects they accuse often when

they know that the crimes have been committed by our own. They are,

on the one hand, afraid to seize or accuse the real offenders, lest

they should avenge themselves by some personal violence, or by thefts

or robberies, which they often commit with a view to get them tumed

out of office as inefficient; and, on the other, they are tempted to

conceal the real offenders by a liberal share of the spoil, and a

promise of not offending again within their beat. Their tenure of

office is far too insecure, and their salaries are far too small.

They are often dismissed summarily by the magistrate if they send him

in no prisoners; and also if they send in to him prisoners who are

not ultimately convicted, because a magistrate's merits are too often

estimated by the proportion that his convictions bear to his

acquittals among the prisoners committed for trial to the sessions.

Men are often ultimately acquitted for want of judicial proof, when

there is abundance of that moral proof on which a police officer or

magistrate has to act in the discharge of his duties; and in a

country where gangs of professional and hereditary robbers and

murderers extend their depredations into very remote parts, and

seldom commit them in the districts in which they reside, the most

vigilant police officer must often fail to discover the perpetrators

of heavy crimes that take place within his range.[6]

When they cannot find them, the native officers either seize innocent

persons, and frighten them into confession, or else they try to

conceal the crime, and in this they are seconded by the sufferers in

the robbery, who will always avoid, if they can, a prosecution in our

courts, and by their neighbours, who dread being summoned to give

evidence as a serious calamity. The man who has been robbed, instead

of being an object of compassion among his neighbours, often incurs

their resentment for subjecting them to this calamity; and they not

only pay largely themselves, but make him pay largely, to have his

losses concealed from the magistrate. Formerly, when a district was

visited by a judge of circuit to hold his sessions only once or twice

a year, and men were constantly bound over to prosecute and appear as

evidence from sessions to sessions, till they were wearied and

worried to death, this evil was much greater than at present, when

every district is provided with its judge of sessions, who is, or

ought to be, always ready to take up the cases committed for trial by

the magistrate.[7] This was one of the best measures of Lord W.

Bentinck's admirable, though much abused, administration of the

government of India.[8] Still, however, the inconvenience and delay

of prosecution in our courts are so great, and the chance of the

ultimate conviction of great offenders is so small, that strong

temptations are held out to the police to conceal or misrepresent the

character of crimes; and they must have a great feeling of security

in their tenure of office, and more adequate salaries, better chances

of rising, and better supervision over them, before they will resist

such temptation. These Thânadârs, and all the public officers under

them, are all so very inadequately paid that corruption among them

excites no feeling of odium or indignation in the minds of those

among whom they live and serve. Such feelings are rather directed

against the government that places them in such situations of so much

labour and responsibility with salaries so inadequate; and thereby

confers upon them virtually a licence to pay themselves by preying

upon those whom they are employed ostensibly to protect. They know

that with such salaries they can never have the reputation of being

honest, however faithfully they may discharge their duties; and it is

too hard to expect that men will long submit to the necessity of

being thought corrupt, without reaping some of the advantages of

corruption. Let the Thânadârs have everywhere such salaries as will

enable them to maintain their families in comfort, and keep up that

appearance of respectability which their station in society demands;

and over every three or four Thânadârs' jurisdiction let there be an

officer appointed upon a higher scale of salary, to supervise and

control their proceedings, and armed with powers to decide minor

offences. To these higher stations the Thânadârs will be able to look

forward as their reward for a faithful and zealous discharge of their

duties.[9]

He who can suppose that men so inadequately paid, who have no

promotion to look forward to, and feel no security in their tenure of

office, and consequently no hope of a provision for old age,[10] will

be zealous and honest in the discharge of their duties, must be very

imperfectly acquainted with human nature, and with the motives by

which men are influenced in all quarters of the world; but we are

none of us so ignorant, for we all know that the same motives actuate

public servants in India as elsewhere. We have acted successfully

upon this knowledge in the scale of salaries and gradation of rank

assigned to European civil functionaries, and to all native

functionaries employed in the judicial and revenue branches of the

public service; and why not act upon it in that of the salaries

assigned to the native officers employed in the police? The

magistrate of a district gets a salary of from two thousand to two

thousand five hundred rupees a month.[11] The native officer next

under him is the Thânadâr, or head native police officer of a

subdivision of his district, containing many towns and villages, with

a population of a hundred thousand souls. This officer gets a salary

of twenty-five rupees a month. He cannot possibly do his duty unless

he keeps one or two horses; indeed, he is told by the magistrate that

he cannot; and that he must have one or two horses, or resign his

post. The people, seeing how much we expect from the Thânadâr, and

how little we give him, submit to his demands for contributions

without murmuring, and consider almost any demand trivial from a man

so employed and so paid. They are confounded at our inconsistency,

and say, 'We see you giving high salaries and high prospects of

advancement to men who have nothing to do but collect your rents, and

decide our disputes about pounds, shillings, and pence, which we used

to decide much better ourselves, when we had no other court but that

of our elders--while those who are to protect life and property, to

keep peace over the land, and enable the industrious to work in

security, maintain their families, and pay the government revenue,

are left with hardly any pay at all.'

There is really nothing in our rule in India which strikes the people

so much as this inconsistency, the evil effects of which are so great

and manifest; the only way to remedy the evil is to give a greater

feeling of security in the tenure of office, a higher rate of salary,

the hope of a provision for old age, and, above all, the gradation of

rank, by interposing the officers I speak of between the Thânadârs

and the magistrate.[12] This has all been done in the establishments

for the collection of the revenue, and administration of civil

justice.

Hobbes, in his _Leviathan_, says, 'And seeing that the end of

punishment is not revenge and discharge of choler, but correction,

either of the offender, or of others by his example, the severest

punishments are to be inflicted for those crimes that are of most

danger to the public; such as are those which proceed from malice to

the government established; those that spring from contempt of

justice; those that provoke indignation in the multitude; and those

which, unpunished, seem authorized, as when they are committed by

sons, servants, or favourites of men in authority.[13] For

indignation carrieth men, not only against the actors and authors of

injustice, but against all power that is likely to protect them; as

in the case of Tarquin, when, for the insolent act of one of his

sons, he was driven out of Rome, and the monarchy itself dissolved.'

(Para. 2, chapter 30.) Almost every one of our Thânadârs is, in his

way, a little Tarquin, exciting the indignation of the people against

his rulers; and no time should be lost in converting him into

something better.

By the obstacles which are still everywhere opposed to the conviction

of offenders, in the distance of our courts, the forms of procedure,

and other causes of 'the law's delay', we render the duties of our

police establishment everywhere 'more honoured in the breach than the

observance', by the mass of the people among whom they are placed. We

must, as I have before said, remove some of these obstacles to the

successful prosecution of offenders in our criminal courts, which

tend so much to deprive the government of all popular aid and support

in the administration of justice; and to convert all our police

establishments into instruments of oppression, instead of what they

should be, the efficient means of protection to the persons,

property, and character of the innocent. Crimes multiply from the

assurance the guilty are everywhere apt to feel of impunity to crime;

and the more crimes multiply, the greater is the aversion the people

everywhere feel to aid the government in the arrest and conviction of

criminals, because they see more and more the innocent punished by

attendance upon distant courts at great cost and inconvenience, to

give evidence upon points which seem to them unimportant, while the

guilty escape owing to technical difficulties which they can never

understand.[14]

The best way to remove these obstacles is to interpose officers

between the Thânadâr and the magistrate, and arm them with judicial

powers to try minor cases, leaving an appeal open to the magistrate,

and to extend the final jurisdiction of the magistrate to a greater

range of crimes, though it should involve the necessity of reducing

the measure of punishment annexed to them.[15] Beccaria has justly

observed that 'Crimes are more effectually prevented by the certainty

than by the severity of punishment. The certainty of a small

punishment will make a stronger impression than the fear of one more

severe, if attended with the hope of escaping; for it is the nature

of mankind to be terrified at the approach of the smallest inevitable

evil; whilst hope, the best gift of Heaven, has the power of

dispelling the apprehensions of a greater, especially if supported by

examples of impunity, which weakness or avarice too frequently

affords.'

I ought to have mentioned that the police of a district, in our

Bengal territories, consists of a magistrate and his assistant, who

are European gentlemen of the Civil Service; and a certain number of

Thânadârs, from twelve to sixteen, who preside over the different

sub-divisions of the district in which they reside with their

establishments. These Thânadârs get twenty-five rupees a month, have

under them four or five Jemadârs upon eight rupees, and thirty or

forty Barkandâzes upon four rupees a month. The Jemadârs are, most of

them, placed in charge of 'nâkas', or sub-divisions of the Thânadâr's

jurisdiction, the rest are kept at their headquarters, ready to move

to any point where their services may be required. These are all paid

by government; but there is in each village one watchman, and in

larger villages more than one, who are appointed by the heads of

villages, and paid by the communities, and required daily or

periodically to report all the police matters of their villages to

the Thânadârs.[16]

The distance between the magistrates and Thânadârs is at present

immeasurable; and an infinite deal of mischief is done by the latter

and those under them, of which the magistrates know nothing whatever.

In the first place, they levy a fee of one rupee from every village

at the festival of the Holî in February, and another at that of the

Dasehra in October, and in each Thânadâr's jurisdiction there are

from one to two hundred villages. These and numerous other

unauthorized exactions they share with those under them, and with the

native officers about the person of the magistrate, who, if not

conciliated, can always manage to make them appear unfit for their

places.[17]

A robbery affords a rich harvest. Some article of stolen property is

found in one man's house, and by a little legerdemain it is conveyed

to that of another, both of whom are made to pay liberally; the man

robbed also pays, and all the members of the village community are

made to do the same. They are all called to the court of the Thânadâr

to give evidence as to what they have seen or heard regarding either

the fact or the persons in the remotest degree connected with it--as

to the arrests of the supposed offenders--the search of their house--

the character of their grandmothers and grandfathers--and they are

told that they are to be sent to the magistrate a hundred miles

distant, and then made to stand at the door among a hundred and fifty

pairs of shoes, till _his excellency_ the Nâzir, the under-sheriff of

the court, may be pleased to announce them to his highness the

magistrate, which, of course, he will not do without a

_consideration_. To escape all these threatened evils, they pay

handsomely and depart in peace. The Thânadâr reports that an attempt

to rob a house by persons unknown had been defeated by his exertions,

and the _good fortune_ of the magistrate; and sends a liberal share

of spoil to those who are to read his report to that functionary.[18]

This goes on more or less in every district, but more especially in

those where the magistrate happens to be a man of violent temper, who

is always surrounded by knaves, because men who have any regard for

their character will not approach him--or a weak, good-natured man,

easily made to believe anything, and managed by favourites--or one

too fond of field-sports, or of music, painting, European languages,

literature, and sciences, or lastly, of his own ease.[19] Some

magistrates think they can put down crime by dismissing the Thânadâr;

but this tends only to prevent crimes being reported to him; for in

such cases the feelings of the people are in exact accordance with

the interests of the Thânadârs; and crimes augment by the assurance

of impunity thereby given to criminals. The only remedy for all this

evil is to fill up the great gulf between the magistrate and Thânadâr

by officers who shall be to him what I have described the patrol

officers to be to the collectors of customs, at once the _tapis_ of

Prince Husain, and the _telescope_ of Prince Ali--a medium that will

enable him to be everywhere, and see everything.[20] And why is this

remedy not applied? Simply and solely because such appointments would

be given to the uncovenanted, and might tend indirectly to diminish

the appointments open to the covenanted servants of the company.

Young gentlemen of the Civil Service are supposed to be doing the

duties which would be assigned to such officers, while they are at

school as assistants to magistrates and collectors; and were this

great gulf filled up by efficient covenanted officers, they would

have no school to go to. There is no doubt some truth in this; but

the welfare of a whole people should not be sacrificed to keep this

school or play-ground open exclusively for them; let them act for a

time as they would unwillingly do with the uncovenanted, and they

will learn much more than if they occupied the ground exclusively and

acted alone--they will be always with people ready and willing to

tell them the real state of things; whereas, at present, they are

always with those who studiously conceal it from them.[21]

It is a common practice with Thânadârs all over the country to

connive at the residence within their jurisdiction of gangs of

robbers, on the condition that they shall not rob within those

limits, and shall give them a share of what they bring back from

their distant expeditions.

They [_scil._ the gangs] go out ostensibly in search of service, on

the termination of the rains of one season in October, and return

before the commencement of the next in June; but their vocation is

always well known to the police, and to all the people of their

neighbourhood, and very often to the magistrates themselves, who

could, if they would, secure them on their return with their booty;

but this would not secure their conviction unless the proprietors

could be discovered, which they scarcely ever could. Were the police

officers to seize them, they would be all finally acquitted and

released by the judges--the magistrate would get into disrepute with

his superiors, by the number of acquittals compared with convictions

exhibited in his monthly tables; and he would vent his spleen upon

the poor Thânadâr, who would at the same time have incurred the

resentment of the robbers; and between both, he would have no

possible chance of escape. He therefore consults his own interest and

his own case by leaving them to carry on their trade of robbery or

murder unmolested; and his master, the magistrate, is well pleased

not to be pestered with charges against men whom he has no chance of

getting ultimately convicted. It was in this way that so many hundred

families of assassins by profession were able for so many generations

to reside in the most cultivated and populous parts of our

territories, and extend their depredations into the remotest parts of

India, before our System of operations was brought to bear upon them

in 1830. Their profession was perfectly well known to the people of

the districts in which they resided, and to the greater part of the

police; they murdered not within their own district, and the police

of that district cared nothing about what they might do beyond

it.[22]

The most respectable native gentleman in the city and district told

me one day an amusing instance of the proceedings of a native officer

of that district, which occurred about five years ago. 'In a village

which he had purchased and let in farms, a shopkeeper was one day

superintending the cutting of some sugar-cane which he had purchased

from a cultivator as it stood. His name was Girdhârî, I think, and

the boy who was cutting it for him was the son of a poor man called

Madârî. Girdhârî wanted to have the cane cut down as near as he could

to the ground, while the boy, to save himself the trouble of

stooping, would persist in cutting it a good deal too high up. After

admonishing him several times, the shopkeeper gave him a smart clout

on the head. The boy, to prevent a repetition, called out, "Murder!

Girdhârî has killed me--Girdhârî has killed me!" His old father, who

was at work carrying away the cane at a little distance out of sight,

ran off to the village watchman, and, in his anger, told him that

Girdhârî had murdered his son. The watchman went as fast as he could

to the Thânadâr, or head police officer of the division, who resided

some miles distant. The Thânadâr ordered off his subordinate officer,

the Jemadâr, with half a dozen policemen, to arrange everything for

an inquest on the body, by the time he should reach the place, with

all due pomp. The Jemadâr went to the house of the murderer, and

dismounting, ordered all the shopkeepers of the village, who were

many and respectable, to be forthwith seized, and bound hand and

feet. "So", said the Jemadâr, "you have all been aiding and abetting

your friend in the murder of poor Madârî's only son." "May it please

your excellency, we have never heard of any murder." "Impudent

scoundrels," roared the Jemadâr, "does not the poor boy lie dead in

the sugar-cane field, and is not his highness the Thânadâr coming to

hold an inquest upon it? and do you take us for fools enough to

believe that any scoundrel among you would venture to commit a

deliberate murder without being aided and abetted by all the rest?"

The village watchman began to feel some apprehension that he had been

too precipitate; and entreated the Jemadâr to go first and see the

body of the boy. "What do you take us for," said the Jemadâr, "a

thing without a stomach? Do you suppose that government servants can

live and labour on air? Are we to go and examine bodies upon empty

stomachs? Let his father take care of the body, and let these

murdering shopkeepers provide us something to eat." Nine rupees'

worth of sweetmeats, and materials for a feast were forthwith

collected at the expense of the shopkeepers, who stood bound, and

waiting the arrival of his highness the Thânadâr, who was soon after

seen approaching majestically upon a richly caparisoned horse.

"What," said the Jemadâr, "is there nobody to go and receive his

highness in due form?" One of the shopkeepers was untied, and

presented with fifteen rupees by his family, and those of the other

shopkeepers. These he took up and presented to his highness, who

deigned to receive them through one of his train, and then dismounted

and partook of the feast that had been provided. "Now", said his

highness, "we will go and hold an inquest on the body of the poor

boy"; and off moved all the great functionaries of government to the

sugar-cane field, with the village watchman leading the way. The

father of the boy met them as they entered, and was pointed out by

the village watchman. "Where", said the Thânadâr, "is your poor boy?"

"There," said Madârî, "cutting the canes." "How, cutting the canes?

Was he not murdered by the shopkeepers?" "No," said Madârî, "he was

beaten by Girdhârî, and richly deserved it! I find." Girdhârî and the

boy were called up, and the little urchin said that he called out

murder merely to prevent Girdhârî from giving him another clout on

the side of the head. His father was then fined nine rupees for

giving a false alarm, and Girdhârî fifteen for so unmercifully

beating the boy; and they were made to pay on the instant, under the

penalty of all being sent off forty miles to the magistrate. Having

thus settled this very important affair, his highness the Thânadâr

walked back to the shop, ordered all the shopkeepers to be set at

liberty, smoked his pipe, mounted his horse, and rode home, followed

by all his police officers, and well pleased with his day's work.'

The farmer of the village soon after made his way to the city, and

communicated the circumstances to my old friend, who happened to be

on intimate terms with the magistrate.[23] He wrote a polite note to

the Thânadâr to say that he should never get any rents from his

estate if the occupants were liable to such fines as these, and that

he should take the earliest opportunity of mentioning them to his

friend the magistrate. The Thânadâr ascertained that he was really in

the habit of visiting the magistrate, and communicating with him

freely; and hushed up the matter by causing all, save the expenses of

the feast, to be paid back. These are things of daily occurrence in

all parts of our dominions, and the Thânadârs are not afraid to play

such 'fantastic tricks' because all those under and all those above

them share more or less in the spoil, and are bound in honour to

conceal them from the European magistrate, whom it is the interest of

all to keep in the dark. They know that the people will hardly ever

complain, from the great dislike they all have to appear in our

courts, particularly when it is against any of the officers of those

courts, or their friends and creatures in the district police.[24]

When our operations commenced, in 1830, these assassins [_scil._ the

Thugs] revelled over every road in India in gangs of hundreds,

without the fear of punishment from divine or human laws; but there

is not now, I believe, a road in India infested by them. That our

government has still defects, and great ones, must be obvious to

every one who has travelled much over India with the requisite

qualifications and disposition to observe; but I believe that in

spite of all the defects I have noticed above in our police System,

the life, property, and character of the innocent are now more

secure, and all their advantages more freely enjoyed, than they ever

were under any former government with whose history we are

acquainted, or than they now are under any native government in

India.[25]

Those who think they are not so almost always refer to the reign of

Shâh Jahân, when men like Tavernier travelled so securely all over

India with their bags of diamonds; but I would ask them whether they

think that the life, property, and character of the innocent could be

anywhere very secure, or their advantages very freely enjoyed, in a

country where a man could do openly with impunity what the traveller

describes to have been done by the Persian physician of the Governor

of Allahabad? This governor, being sickly, had in attendance upon him

_eleven physicians_, one of whom was a European gentleman of

education, Claudius Maille, of Bourges.[26] The chief favourite of

the eleven was, however, a Persian, 'who one day threw his wife from

the top of a battlement to the ground in a fit of jealousy. He

thought the fall would kill her, but she had only a few ribs broken;

whereupon the kindred of the woman came and demanded justice at the

feet of the governor. The governor, sending for the physician,

commanded him to be gone, resolving to retain him no longer in his

service. The physician obeyed; and putting his poor maimed wife in a

palankeen, he set forward upon the road with all his family. But he

had not gone above three or four days' journey from the city, when

the governor, finding himself worse than he was wont to be, sent to

recall him; which the physician perceiving, stabbed his wife, his

four children, and thirteen female slaves, and returned again to the

Governor, who said not a word to him, but entertained him again in

his service.' This occurred within Tavernier's own knowledge and

about the time he visited Allahabad; and is related as by no means a

very extraordinary circumstance.[27]

Notes:

1. January, 1836.

2. The tomb of Safdar Jang, or Mansûr Alî Khân, described _ante_,

chapter 68 [4]. The bridges over the Jumna are now, of course,

maintained by Government and the railway companies.

3. The main highways approaching Delhi are now excellent metalled

roads.

4. By the term 'the largest military station in the empire', the

author means Meerut. At present the largest military station in

Northern India is, I believe, Râwal Pindi, and the combined

cantonments of Secunderâbâd and Bolarum in the Nizam's dominions

constitute the largest military station in the empire.

5. Comprising parts of the Meerut and Muzaffarnagar districts of the

North-Western Provinces, now the Agra Province in the United

Provinces of Agra and Oudh. The Bêgam's history will be discussed in

chapter 75, _post_.

6. The members of the reformed police force, constituted under Act V

of 1861, generally on the model of the Royal Irish Constabulary, have

no reason to complain of insecurity of tenure. It is now very

difficult to obtain sanction to the dismissal of a corrupt or

inefficient officer, unless he has been judicially convicted of a

statutory offence.

7. Ordinarily there is for each district, or administrative unit, a

separate Sessions and District Judge, who tries both civil and

criminal cases of the more serious kind. Occasionally two or three

districts have only one judge between them, who is then usually in

arrear with his work. Sessions for the trial of grave criminal cases

are held monthly, bimonthly, or quarterly, according to

circumstances. In some districts, and for some classes of cases, the

jury system has been introduced, but, as a rule, in Northern India

the responsibility rests with the judge alone, who receives some

slight aid from assessors. Capital sentences passed by a Sessions

Judge must be confirmed by two Judges of a High Court, or equivalent

tribunal.

8. The historian Thornton (chapter 27) went so far as to declare that

Lord William Bentinck has 'done less for the interest of India, and

for his own reputation, than any who had occupied his place since the

commencement of the nineteenth century, with the single exception of

Sir George Barlow'. The abolition of widow-burning is the only act of

the Bentinck administration which this writer could praise. Such a

criticism is manifestly unjust, the outcome of contemporary anger and

prejudice. The inscription written by Macaulay, the friend and

coadjutor of Lord William, and placed on the statue of the reforming

Governor-General in Calcutta, does not give undeserved praise to the

much abused statesman. Sir William Sleeman so much admired Lord

William Bentinck, and formed such a favourable estimate of the merits

of his government, that it may be well to support his opinion by that

of Macaulay. The text of the inscription is:

TO

WILLIAM CAVENDISH BENTINCK,

who during seven years ruled India with eminent prudence,

integrity, and benevolence;

who, placed at the head of a great Empire, never laid aside

the simplicity and moderation of a private citizen;

who infused into Oriental despotism the spirit

of British freedom;

who never forgot that the end of Government is the happiness

of the governed;

who abolished cruel rites;

who effaced humiliating distinctions;

who gave liberty to the expression of public opinion;

whose constant study it was to elevate the intellectual and

moral character of the nation committed to his charge,

THIS MONUMENT

was erected by men

who, differing in race, in manners, in language and in religion,

cherish with equal veneration and gratitude

the memory of his wise, reforming, and paternal administration.

(_Lord William Bentinck_, by D. Boulger, p. 203; 'Rulers of India'

series.)

9. A European District Superintendent of Police, under the general

supervision of the Magistrate of the District, now commands the

police of each district, and sometimes has one or two European

Assistants. He is also aided by well-paid Inspectors, who are for the

most part natives of India. Measures have recently been taken,

especially in the United Provinces, to improve the pay, training, and

position of the police force, European and Indian.

10. Police officers and men now obtain pensions, like public servants

in other departments.

11. In some provinces the highest salaries of magistrates are much

lower than the rates stated by the author, which are the highest paid

to the most senior officers in certain provinces; and, in all

provinces, officiating incumbents, who form a large proportion of the

officers employed, draw only a part of the full salary. The fall in

exchange has enormously reduced the real value of all Indian

salaries.

12. Another popular view of this subject, and, I think, the one more

commonly taken, is expressed in the anecdote told _ante_, chapter 58

following [10]. Well-paid Inspectors of Police, drawing salaries of

150 to 200 rupees a month, are often extremely corrupt, and retire

with large fortunes, I knew many cases, but could never obtain

judicial proof of one.

13. When 'sons, servants, or favourites of men in authority', in

India, no longer oppress their fellows, the millennium will have

arrived.

14. It is some slight satisfaction to a zealous magistrate of the

present day, when he sees a great and influential criminal escape his

just doom, to think that even the best magistrates many years ago had

to submit to similar painful experiences. India cannot truly be

described as an uncivilized or barbarous country, but, side by side

with elements of the highest civilization, it contains many elements

of primitive and savage barbarism. The savagery of India cannot be

dealt with by barristers or moral text-books.

15. The number of subordinate magistrates, paid and unpaid, has of

late years been enormously increased, and courts are, consequently,

much more numerous than they used to be. The vast increase in

facility of communication has also diminished the inconveniences

which the author deplores. In Oudh, and certain other provinces,

which used to be called Non-Regulation, the chief Magistrate of the

District has power to try and adequately punish all offences, except

capital ones. The power is useful, when the district officer has time

to exercise it, which is not always the case.

16. There is a Superintendent of Police for the Province of Bengal;

but in the North-Western Provinces his duties are divided among the

Commissioners of Revenue. [W. H. S.] By 'Superintendent of Police'

the author means the high officer now called the Inspector-General of

Police, under the present System each Local Government or

Administration has one of these officers, who is aided by one or more

staff officers as Assistant-Inspectors-General. The Commissioners in

the United Provinces have been relieved of police duties. The

organization of police stations has been much modified since the

author's time. 'Our Bengal territories', as understood by the author,

included, in addition to Bengal, the 'North-Western Provinces', now

the Province, of Agra, the Saugor and Nerbudda Territories, now in

the Central Provinces, and the Delhi Territories. Oudh, of course,

was then independent; and the Panjâb was under the rule of Ranjit

Singh.

17. All these practices are still carried on; and experienced

magistrates are well aware of their existence, though powerless to

stop them. People will often give private information of

malpractices, but will hardly ever come into court, and speak out

openly. A magistrate cannot take action on statements which the

makers will not submit to cross-examination.

18. This is still a favourite trick. Every year Inspectors-General of

Police and Secretaries to Government make the same sarcastic remarks

about the wonderful number of 'attempts at burglary', and the

apparent contentment of the criminal classes with the small results

of their labours. But the Thânadâr is too much for even Inspectors-

General and Secretaries to Government. No amount of reorganization

changes him.

19. Mr. R., when appointed magistrate of the district of Fathpur on

the Ganges, had a wish to translate the 'Henriade', and, in order to

secure leisure, he issued a proclamation to all the Thânadârs of his

district to put down crime, declaring that he would hold them

responsible for what might be committed, and dismiss from his

situation every one who should suffer any to be committed within his

charge. This district, lying on the borders of Oudh, had been noted

for the number and atrocious character of its crimes. From that day

all the periodical returns went up to the superior court blank--not a

crime was reported. Astonished at this sudden result of the change of

magistrates, the superior court of Calcutta (the Sadr Nizâmat Adâlat)

requested one of the judges, who was about to pass through the

district on his way down, to inquire into the nature of the System

which seemed to work so well, with a view to its adoption in other

districts. He found crimes were more abundant than ever; and the

Thânadârs showed him the proclamation, which had been understood, as

all such proclamations are, not as enjoining vigilance in the

prosecution of crime, but as prohibiting all report of them, so as to

_save the magistrate trouble_, and get him a good name with his

superiors. [W. H. S.]

Great caution should always be used by local officers in making

comments on statistics. The subordinate cares nothing for the facts.

When a superior objects that the birth-rate is too low and the death-

rate too high in any police circle, the practical conclusion drawn by

the police is that the figures of the next return must be made more

palatable, and they are cooked accordingly. So, if burglaries are too

numerous, they cease to be reported, and so forth.

The old Superior Court was known as the Sadr Nizâmat Adâlat, on the

criminal, and as the Sadr Dîwânî Adâlat, on the civil side. These

courts have now been replaced by the High Courts, and equivalent

tribunals. In the author's time the High Court for the Agra Province

had not yet been established. Its seat is now at Allahabad, but was

formerly at Agra.

20. The gap has been filled up by numbers of Deputy Magistrates,

Tahsîldâr, &c., invested with magisterial powers, Honorary

Magistrates, District Superintendents, and Inspectors, and yet all

the old games still go on merrily. The reason is that the character

of the people has not changed. The police must have the power to

arrest, and that power, when wielded by unscrupulous hands, must

always be formidable.

21. A magistrate who can find in his district even one man, official

or unofficial, who will tell him 'the real state of things', and not

merely repeat scandal and malignant gossip, is unusually fortunate.

22. The Thugs were suppressed because a special organization was

devised and directed for the purpose, the English rules as to the

admissibility of evidence being judiciously relaxed. The ordinary law

and methods of procedure are of little effect against the secret

societies known as 'criminal tribes'. These criminal tribes number

hundreds of thousands of persona, and present a problem almost

unknown to European experience. The gipsies, who are largely of

Indian origin, are, perhaps, the only European example of an

hereditary criminal tribe. But they are not sheltered and abetted by

the landowners as their brethren in India are.

23. The magistrate, of course, was the author.

24. These motives all retain their full force, and are unaffected by

Police Commissions and reorganization schemes. Some people think that

the character of the police will be raised by the employment as

officers of young Indians of good family. I am sorry to say that I

found these young men to be the worst offenders. They are more daring

in their misdeeds than the ordinary policeman, and no better in their

morals.

25. This is quite true; and it is also true that our police

administration is the weakest part of our System. But the fault is

not entirely that of the police. In some provinces, especially in

Bengal, the action of the High Courts has almost paralysed the arm of

the Executive.

26. 'M. Claude Maille, of Bourges. As we shall see in Book I, chapter

18, a man of this name, who had escaped from the Dutch service, was,

in the year 1652, a not very successful amateur gun-founder for Mîr

Jumla; he had, after his escape, set up as a surgeon to the Nawâb,

with an equipment consisting of a case of instruments and a box of

ointments which he had stolen from M. Cheteur, the Dutch Ambassador

to Golconda. Tavernier throws no light upon his identity with this

physician.' (Tavernier, _Travels_, ed. Ball, vol. i, p. 116, note).

M. Maille befriended Manucci, who mentions him several times (Irvine,

_Storia do Mogor_, i, 92, &c.)

27. Ball's version of this horrible story (vol. i, p. 117) does not

differ materially from that quoted in the text. Tavernier does not

mention the name of the governor, though he observes that he was 'one

of the greatest nobles in India'. Tavernier visited Allahabad in

December, 1665, and then heard the story, the governor concerned

being at the time in the fort. I have no doubt that in the reign of

Shâh Jahân ordinary offences committed by ordinary criminals were

ruthlessly punished, and to some extent suppressed. But, under the

best Asiatic Governments, great men and their dependants have usually

been able to do pretty much what they pleased. The English Government

has the merit of refusing to give formal recognition to difference of

rank in criminals, and of often trying to punish influential

offenders, though seldom succeeding in the attempt. From time to time

a conspicuous example, like that of the Nawâb Shams-ud-dîn, is made,

and a few such examples, combined with the greater vigilance and more

complete organization of the English executive, prevent the

occurrence of atrocities so great as that described, without a word

of comment, by the French traveller. I have not the slightest doubt,

nor has any magistrate of long experience any doubt, that women are

frequently made away with quietly in the recesses of the 'zanâna'. I

have known several such cases, which were notorious, though incapable

of judicial proof. The amount of serious secret crime which occurs in

India, and never comes to light, is very considerable.

CHAPTER 70

Rent-free Tenures--Right of Government to Resume such Grants.

ON the 27th[1] we went on fifteen miles to Bêgamâbâd, over a sandy

and level country. All the peasantry along the roads were busy

watering their fields; and the singing of the man who stood at the

well to tell the other who guides the bullocks when to pull, after

the leather bucket had been filled at the bottom, and when to stop as

it reached the top, was extremely pleasing.[2] It is said that Tânsên

of Delhi, the most celebrated singer they have ever had in India,

used to spend a great part of his time in these fields, listening to

the simple melodies of these water-drawers, which he learned to

imitate and apply to his more finished vocal music. Popular belief

ascribes to Tânsên the power of stopping the river Jumna in its

course. His contemporary and rival, Birjû Baulâ, who, according to

popular belief, could split a rock with a single note, is said to

have learned his bass from the noise of the stone mills which the

women use in grinding the corn for their families.[3] Tânsên was a

Brahman from Patna, who entered the service of the Emperor Akbar,

became a Musalmân, and after the service of twenty-seven years,

during which he was much beloved by the Emperor and all his court, he

died at Gwâlior in the thirty-fourth year of the Emperor's reign. His

tomb is still to be seen at Gwâlior. All his descendants are said to

have a talent for music, and they have all Sên added to their

names.[4]

While Mâdhojî Sindhia, the Gwâlior chief, was prime minister, he made

the emperor assign to his daughter the Bâlâ Bâî in jâgîr, or rent-

free tenure, ninety-five villages, rated in the imperial 'sanads'

[deeds of grant] at three lâkhs of rupees a year. When the Emperor

had been released from the 'durance vile' in which he was kept by

Daulat Râo Sindhia, the adopted son of this chief,[5] by Lord Lake in

1803, and the countries, in which these villages were situated, taken

possession of, she was permitted to retain them on condition that

they were to escheat to us on her death. She died in 1834, and we

took possession of the villages, which now yield, it is said, four

lâkhs of rupees a year. Bêgamâbâd was one of them. It paid to the

Bâlâ Bâi only six hundred rupees a year, but it pays now to us six

hundred and twenty rupees; but the farmers and cultivators do not pay

a farthing more--the difference was taken by the favourite to whom

she assigned the duties of collection, and who always took as much as

he could get from them, and paid as little as he could to her.[6] The

tomb of the old collector stood near my tents, and his son, who came

to visit it, told me that he had heard from Gwâlior that a new

Governor-General was about to arrive,[7] who would probably order the

villages to be given back, when he should be made collector of the

village, as his father had been.

Had our Government acted by all the rent-free lands in our

territories on the same principle, they would have saved themselves a

vast deal of expense, trouble, and odium. The justice of declaring

all lands liable to resumption on the death of the present incumbents

when not given by competent authority for, and actually applied to,

the maintenance of religious, charitable, educational, or other

establishments of manifest public utility, would never have been for

a moment questioned by the people of India, because they would have

all known that it was in accordance with the customs of the country.

If, at the same time that we declared all land liable to resumption,

when not assigned by such authority for such purposes and actually

applied to them, we had declared that all grants by competent

authority registered in due form before the death of the present

incumbents should be liable on their death to the payment to

Government of only a quarter or half the rent arising from them, it

would have been universally hailed as an act of great liberality,

highly calculated to make our reign popular. As it is, we have

admitted the right of former rulers of all descriptions to alienate

in perpetuity the land, the principal source of the revenue of the

state, in favour of their relatives, friends, and favourites, leaving

upon the holders the burthen of proving, at a ruinous cost in fees

and bribes, through court after court, that these alienations had

been made by the authorities we declare competent, before the time

prescribed; and we have thus given rise to an infinite deal of fraud,

perjury, and forgery, and to the opinion, I fear, very generally

prevalent, that we are anxious to take advantage of unavoidable flaws

in the proof required, to trick them out of their lands by tedious

judicial proceedings, while we profess to be desirous that they

should retain them. In this we have done ourselves great

injustice.[8]

Though these lands were often held for many generations under former

Governments, and for the exclusive benefit of the holders, it was

almost always, when they were of any value, in collusion with the

local authorities, who concealed the circumstances from their

sovereign for a certain stipulated sum or share of the rents while

they held office. This of course the holders were always willing to

pay, knowing that no sovereign would hesitate much to resume their

lands, should the circumstance of their holding them for their

private use alone be ever brought to his notice. The local

authorities were, no doubt, always willing to take a moderate share

of the rent, knowing that they would get nothing should the lands be

resumed by the sovereign. Sometimes the lands granted were either at

the time the grant was made, or became soon after, waste and

depopulated, in consequence of invasion or internal disorders; and

remaining in this state for many generations, the intervening

sovereigns either knew nothing or cared nothing about the grants.

Under our rule they became by degrees again cultivated and peopled,

and in consequence valuable, not by the exertions of the rent-free

holders, for they were seldom known to do anything but collect the

rents, but by those of the farmers and cultivators who pay them.

When Saâdat Alî Khan, the sovereign of Oudh, ceded Rohilkhand and

other districts to the Honourable Company in lieu of tribute in 1801,

he resumed every inch of land held in rent-free tenure within the

territories that remained with him, without condescending to assign

any other reason than state necessity. The measure created a good

deal of distress, particularly among the educated classes; but not so

much as a similar measure would have created within our territories,

because all his revenues are expended in the maintenance of

establishments formed exclusively out of the members of Oudh

families, and retained within the country, while ours are sent to pay

establishments formed and maintained at a distance; and those whose

lands are resumed always find it exceedingly difficult to get

employment suitable to their condition.

The face of the country between Delhi and Meerut is sadly denuded of

its groves; not a grove or an avenue is to be seen anywhere, and but

few fine solitary trees.[9] I asked the people of the cause, and was

told by the old men of the village that they remembered well when the

Sikh chiefs who now bask under the sunshine of our protection used to

come over at the head of 'dalas' (bodies) of ten or twelve horse

each, and plunder and lay waste with fire and sword, at every

returning harvest, the fine country which I now saw covered with rich

sheets of cultivation, and which they had rendered a desolate waste,

'without a man to make, or a man to grant, a petition', when Lord

Lake came among them.[10] They were, they say, looking on at a

distance when he fought the battle of Delhi, and drove the Marâthâs,

who were almost as bad as the Sikhs, into the Jumna river, where ten

thousand of them were drowned. The people of all classes in Upper

India feel the same reverence as our native soldiery for the name of

this admirable soldier and most worthy man, who did so much to

promote our interests and sustain our reputation in this country.[11]

The most beautiful trees in India are the 'bar' (banyan), the

'pîpal', and the tamarind.[12] The two first are of the fig tribe,

and their greatest enemies are the elephants and camels of our public

establishments and public servants, who prey upon them wherever they

can find them when under the protection of their masters or keepers,

who, when appealed to, generally evince a very philosophical

disregard to the feeling of either property or piety involved in the

trespass. It is consequently in the driest and hottest parts of the

country, where the shade of these trees is most wanted, that it is

least to be found; because it is there that camels thrive best, and

are most kept, and it is most difficult to save such trees from their

depredations.

In the evening a trooper passed our tents on his way in great haste

from Meerut to Delhi, to announce the death of the poor old Bêgam

Samrû, which had taken place the day before at her little capital of

Sardhana. For five-and-twenty years had I been looking forward to the

opportunity of seeing this very extraordinary woman, whose history

had interested me more than that of any other character in India

during my time; and I was sadly disappointed to hear of her death

when within two or three stages of her capital.[13]

Notes:

1. January, 1836.

2. Mr. Fox Strangways gives specimens of songs sung at wells in his

learned and original book, _The Music of Hindostan_ (Oxford, 1914,

pp. 20, 21).

3. Brij Bowla in the original edition. The name is correctly written

Birjû Baulâ or Baurâ. A legend of the rivalry between him and Tânsên

is given in _Linguistic Survey of India_, vi, 47. His name is not

included in Abûl Fazl's list of eminent musicians, or in Blochmann's

notes to it (Âîn trans. i, 612), and I have not succeeded in

obtaining any trustworthy information about him. Marvellous legends

of the rival singers will be found in _N.I.N. & Qu._ vol. v, para.

207.

4. Abûl Fazl describes Tânsên as being of Gwâlior, adding that 'a

singer like him has not been in India for the last thousand years'.

Nos. 2-5 and several others in Abûl Fazl's list of eminent musicians

in Akbar's reign are all noted as belonging to Gwâlior, which

evidently was the most musical of cities (Blochmann, transl. Âîn, i,

612). Sleeman appears to have been mistaken in connecting Tânsên with

Patna. But the musician must really have become a Musalmân, because

his tomb stands close to the south-western corner of the sepulchre at

Gwâlior of Muhammad Ghaus, an eminent Muslim saint. No Hindu could

have been buried in such a spot (_A.S.R._, vol. ii, p. 370).

According to one account Tânsên died in Lahore, his body being

removed to Gwâlior by order of Akbar (Forbes, _Oriental Memoirs_,

London, 1813, vol. iii, p. 32). The leaves of the tamarind-tree

overshadowing the tomb are believed to improve the voice marvellously

when chewed.

Mr. Fox Strangways notes that Hindu critics hold Tânsên 'principally

responsible for the deterioration of Hindu music. He is said to have

falsified the râgs, and two, Hindol and Megh, of the original six

have disappeared since his time' (op. cit., p. 84).

Akbar, in the seventh year of his reign (1562-3), compelled the Râjâ

of Rîwâ (Bhath) to give up Tânsên, who was in the Râjâ's service. The

emperor gave the musician Rs. 200,000. 'Most of his compositions are

written in Akbar's name, and his melodies are even nowadays

everywhere repeated by the people of Hindustân' (Blochmann, op. cit.,

p. 406). Tânsên died in A.D. 1588 (Beale).

5. Shâh Alam is the sovereign alluded to. Mâhâdajî (Mâdhojî or

Mâdhava Râo) Sindhia died in February, 1794. His successor, Daulat

Râo, was then a boy of fourteen or fifteen (Grant Duff, _History of

the Mahrattas_, ed. 1826, vol. iii, p. 86). The formal adoption of

Daulat Râo had not been completed (ibid., p. 91).

6. This observation is a good illustration of the tendency of

administrators in a country so poor as India to take note of the

infinitely little. In Europe no one would take the trouble to notice

the difference between £60 and £62 rental.

7. Lord Auckland, in March, 1836, relieved Sir Charles Metcalfe, who,

as temporary Governor-General, had succeeded Lord William Bentinck.

8. The resumption, that is to say, assessment, of revenue-free lands

was a burning question in the anthor's day. It has long since got

settled. The author was quite right in his opinion. All native

Governments freely exercised the right of resumption, and did not

care in the least what phrases were used in the deed of grant. The

old Hindoo deeds commonly directed that the grant should last 'as

long as the sun and moon shall endure', and invoked awful curses on

the head of the resumer. But this was only formal legal phraseology,

meaning nothing. No ruler was bound by his predecessor's acts.

9. This is not now the case.

10. 'It is difficult to realize that the dignified, sober, and

orderly men who now fill our regiments are of the same stock as the

savage freebooters whose name, a hundred years ago, was the terror of

Northern India. But the change has been wrought by strong and kindly

government and by strict military discipline under sympathetic

officers whom the troops love and respect.' (Sir Lepel Griffin,

_Ranjît Singh_, p. 37.)

11. Gerard Lake was born on the 27th July, 1744, and entered the army

before he was fourteen. He served in the Seven Years' War in Germany,

in the American War, in the French campaign of 1793, and against the

Irish rebels in 1798. In the year 1801 he became Commander-in-Chief

in India, and proceeded to Cawnpore, then our frontier station. Two

years later the second Marâthâ War began, and gave General Lake the

opportunity of winning a series of brilliant victories. In rapid

succession he defeated the enemy at Kôil, Alîgarh, Delhi (the battle

alluded to in the text), Agra, and Laswârî. Next year, 1804, the

glorious record was marred by the disaster to Colonel Monson's force,

but this was quickly avenged by the decisive victories of Dîg and

Farrukhâbâd, which shattered Holkâr's power. The year 1805 saw

General Lake's one personal failure, the unsuccessful siege of

Bharatpur. The Commander-in-Chief then resumed the pursuit of Holkâr,

and forced him to surrender. He sailed for England in February, 1807,

and on his arrival at home was created a Viscount. On the 21st

February, 1808, he died. (Pearse, _Memoir of the Life and Military

Services of Viscount Lake_. London, Blackwood, 1908.) The village of

Patparganj, nearly due east from Humâyûn's Tomb, marks the site of

the battle. Fanshawe (p. 70) gives a plan.

12. The banyan is the _Ficus indica_, or _Urostigma bengalense_; the

'pîpal' is _Ficus religiosa_, or _Urostigma religiosum_; and the

tamarind is the _Tamarindus indica_, or _occidentalis_, or

_officinalis_.

13. The history of the Bêgam is given in Chapter 76, _post_.

CHAPTER 71

The Station of Meerut--'Atâlîs' who Dance and Sing gratuitously for

the Benefit of the Poor.

On the 30th,[1] we went on twelve miles to Meerut, and encamped close

to the Sûraj Kund, so called after Sûraj-mal, the Jât chief of Dîg,

whose tomb I have described at Govardhan.[2] He built here a very

large tank, at the recommendation of the spirit of a Hindoo saint,

Manohar Nâth, whose remains had been burned here more than two

hundred years before, and whose spirit appeared to the Jât chief in a

dream, as he was encamped here with his army during one of his

_kingdom-taking_ expeditions. This is a noble work, with a fine sheet

of water, and flights of steps of 'pakkâ' masonry from the top to its

edge all round. The whole is kept in repair by our Government.[3]

About half a mile to the north-west of the tank stands the tomb of

Shâh Pîr, a Muhammadan saint, who is said to have descended from the

mountains with the Hindoo, and to have been his bosom friend up to

the day of his death. Both are said to have worked many wonderful

miracles among the people of the surrounding country, who used to see

them, according to popular belief, quietly taking their morning ride

together upon the backs of two enormous tigers who came every morning

at the appointed hour from the distant jungle. The Hindoo is said to

have been very fond of music; and though he has been now dead some

three centuries, a crowd of amateurs (atâlîs) assemble every Sunday

afternoon at his shrine, on the bank of the tank, and sing gratis,

and in a very pleasing style, to an immense concourse of people, who

assemble to hear them, and to solicit the spirit of the old saint,

softened by their melodies. At the tomb of the Muhammadan saint a

number of professional dancers and singers assemble every Thursday

afternoon, and dance, sing, and play gratis to a large concourse of

people, who make offerings of food to the poor, and implore the

intercession of the old man with the Deity in return.

The Muhammadan's tomb is large and handsome, and built of red

sandstone, inlaid with marble, but without any cupola, that there may

be no _curtain_ between him and heaven when he gets out of his 'last

long sleep' at the resurrection.[4] Not far from his tomb is another,

over the bones of a pilgrim they call Ganj-i-fann, or the granary of

science. Professional singers and dancers attend it every Friday

afternoon, and display their talents gratis to a large concourse, who

bestow what they can in charity to the poor, who assemble on all

these occasions to take what they can get. Another much frequented

tomb lies over a Muhammadan saint, who has not been dead more than

three years, named Gohar Sâh. He owes his canonization to a few

circumstances of recent occurrence, which are, however, universally

believed. Mr. Smith, an enterprising merchant of Meerut, who had

raised a large windmill for grinding corn in the Sadr Bâzâr, is said

to have abused the old man as he was one day passing by, and looked

with some contempt on his method of grinding, which was to take the

bread from the mouths of so many old widows. 'My child,' said the old

saint, 'amuse thyself with this toy of thine, for it has but a few

days to run.' In four days from that time the machine stopped. Poor

Mr. Smith could not afford to set it going again, and it went to

ruin. The whole native population of Meerut considered this a miracle

of Gohar Sâh. Just before his death the country round Meerut was

under water, and a great many houses fell from incessant rain. The

old man took up his residence during this time in a large sarâi in

the town, but finding his end approach, he desired those who had

taken shelter with him to have him taken to the jungle where he now

reposes. They did so, and the instant they left the building it fell

to the ground. Many who saw it told me they had no doubt that the

virtues of the old man had sustained it while he was there, and

prevented its crushing all who were in it. The tomb was built over

his remains by a Hindoo officer of the court, who had been long out

of employment and in great affliction. He had no sooner completed the

tomb, and implored the aid of the old man, than he got into excellent

service, and has been ever since a happy man. He makes regular

offerings to his shrine, as a grateful return for the saint's

kindness to him in his hour of need. Professional singers and dancers

display their talents here gratis, as at the other tombs, every

Wednesday afternoon.

The ground all round these tombs is becoming crowded with the graves

of people, who in their last moments request to be buried (zêr-sâya)

under the shadow of these saints, who in their lifetime are all said

to have despised the pomps and vanities of this life, and to have

taken nothing from their disciples and worshippers but what was

indispensably necessary to support existence--food being the only

thing offered and accepted, and that taken only when they happened to

be very hungry. Happy indeed was the man whose dish was put forward

when the saint's appetite happened to be sharp. The death of the poor

old Bêgam has, it is said, just canonized another saint, Shâkir Shâh,

who lies buried at Sardhana, but is claimed by the people of Meerut,

among whom he lived till about five years ago, when he desired to be

taken to Sardhana, where he found the old lady very dangerously ill

and not expected to live. He was himself very old and ill when he set

out from Meerut; and the journey is said to have shaken him so much

that he found his end approaching, and sent a messenger to the

princess in these words: 'Ayâ torê, chale ham'; that is, 'Death came

for thee, but I go in thy place'; and he told those around him that

she had precisely five years more to live. She is said to have caused

a tomb to be built over him, and is believed by the people to have

died that day five years.

All these things I learned as I wandered among the tombs of the old

saints the first few evenings after my arrival at Meerut. I was

interested in their history from the circumstance that amateur

singers and professional dancers and musicians should display their

talents at their shrines gratis, for the sake of getting alms for the

poor of the place, given in their name--a thing I had never before

heard of--though the custom prevails no doubt in other places; and

that Musalmâns and Hindoos should join promiscuously in their

devotions and charities at all these shrines. Manohar Nâth's shrine,

though he was a Hindoo, is attended by as many Musalmân as Hindoo

pilgrims. He is said to have 'taken the _samâdh_', that is, to have

buried himself alive in this place as an offering to the Deity. Men

who are afflicted with leprosy or any other incurable disease in

India often take the samâdh, that is, bury or drown themselves with

due ceremonies, by which they are considered as acceptable sacrifices

to the Deity. I once knew a Hindoo gentleman of great wealth and

respectability, and of high rank under the Government of Nâgpur, who

came to the river Nerbudda, two hundred miles, attended by a large

retinue, to _take the samâdh_ in due form, from a painful disease

which the doctors pronounced incurable. After taking an affectionate

leave of all his family and friends, he embarked on board the boat,

which took him into the deepest part of the river. He then loaded

himself with sand, as a sportsman who is required to carry weights in

a race loads himself with shot, and stepping into the water

disappeared. The funeral ceremonies were then performed, and his

family, friends, and followers returned to Nâgpur, conscious that

they had all done what they had been taught to consider their duty.

Many poor men do the same every year when afflicted by any painful

disease that they consider incurable.[5] The only way to prevent this

is to carry out the plan now in progress of giving to India in an

accessible shape the medical science of Europe--a plan first adopted

under Lord W. Bentinck, prosecuted by Lord Auckland, and

superintended by two able and excellent men, Doctors Goodeve and

O'Shaughnessy. It will be one of the greatest blessings that India

has ever received from England.[6]

Notes:

1. January, 1836. The date is misprinted 20th in the original

edition.

2. _Ante_, chapter 56 [13].

3. 'Amongst the remains of former times in and around Meerut may be

noticed the Sûraj kund, commonly called by Europeans 'the monkey

tank'. It was constructed by Jawâhir Mal, a wealthy merchant of

Lâwâr, in 1714. It was intended to keep it full of water from the Abû

Nâla but at present the tank is nearly dry in May and June. There are

numerous small temples, 'dharmsâlâs' [i.e. rest-houses], and 'satî'

pillars on its banks, but none of any note. The largest of the

temples is dedicated to Manohar Nâth, and is said to have been built

in the reign of Shâh Jahân. Lâwâr, a large village . . . is distant

twelve miles north of the civil station. . . . There is a fine house

here called Mahal Sarâi, built about A.D. 1700 by Jawâhir Singh,

Mahâjan, who constructed the Sûraj kund near Meerut' (_N.W.P.

Gazetteer_, 1st ed., vol. iii, pp. 406,400). This information,

supplied by the local officials, is more to be depended on than the

author's statement.

4. 'The "dargâh" [i.e. shrine] of Shâh Pîr is a fine structure of red

sandstone, erected about A.D. 1620 by Nûr Jahân, the wife of the

Emperor Jahângîr, in memory of a pious fakîr named Shâh Pîr. An

"urs", or religions assembly, is held here every year in the month of

Ramazân. The "dargâh" is supported from the proceeds of the revenue-

free village of Bhagwânpur' (ibid., vol. iii, p. 406). The text of

the original edition gives the pilgrim's name as 'Gungishun', which

has no meaning.

5. An interesting collection of modern cases of a similar kind is

given in Balfour, _Cyclopaedia_, 3rd ed., s.v. 'Samadhi'.

6. See _ante_, chapter 15, note l4. Dr. W. B. O'Shaughnessy

contributed many scientific papers to the _J.A.S.B._ (vols. viii, ix,

x, xii, and xvi).

CHAPTER 72

Subdivisions of Lands--Want of Gradations of Rank--Taxes.

The country between Delhi and Meerut is well cultivated and rich in

the latent power of its soil; but there is here, as everywhere else

in the Upper Provinces, a lamentable want of gradations in society,

from the eternal subdivision of property in land, and the want of

that concentration of capital in commerce and manufactures which

characterizes European--or I may take a wider range, and say

Christian societies.[1] Where, as in India, the landlords' share of

the annual returns from the soil has been always taken by the

Government as the most legitimate fund for the payment of its public

establishments; and the estates of the farmers, and the holdings of

the immediate cultivators of the soil, are liable to be subdivided in

equal shares among the sons in every succeeding generation, the land

can never aid much in giving to society that without which no society

can possibly be well organized--a gradation of rank. Were the

Government to alter the System, to give up all the rent of the lands,

and thereby convert all the farmers into proprietors of their

estates, the case would not be much altered, while the Hindoo and

Muhammadan law of inheritance remained the same; for the eternal

subdivision would still go on, and reduce all connected with the soil

to one common level; and the people would be harassed with a

multiplicity of taxes, from which they are now free, that would have

to be imposed to supply the place of the rent given up. The

agricultural capitalists who derived their incomes from the interest

of money advanced to the farmers and cultivators for subsistence and

the purchase of stock were commonly men of rank and influence in

society; but they were never a numerous class.[2] The mass of the

people in India are really not at present sensible that they pay any

taxes at all. The only necessary of life, whose price is at all

increased by taxes, is salt, and the consumer is hardly aware of this

increase. The natives never eat salted meat; and though they require

a great deal of salt, living, as they do, so much on vegetable food,

still they purchase it in such small quantities from day to day as

they require it, that they really never think of the tax that may

have been paid upon it in its progress.[3]

To understand the nature of taxation in India, an Englishman should

suppose that all the non-farming landholders of his native country

had, a century or two ago, consented to resign their property into

the hands of their sovereign, for the maintenance of his civil

functionaries, army, navy, church, and public creditors, and then

suddenly disappeared from the community, leaving to till the lands

merely the farmers and cultivators; and that their forty millions of

rent were just the sum that the Government now required to pay all

these four great establishments.[4]

To understand the nature of the public debt of England a man has only

to suppose one great national establishment, twice as large as those

of the civil functionaries, the Army, Navy, and the Church together,

and composed of members with fixed salaries, who purchased their

commissions from _the wisdom of our ancestors_, with liberty to sell

them to whom they please--who have no duty to perform for the

public,[5] and have, like Adam and Eve, the privilege of going to

'seek their place of rest' in what part of the world they please--a

privilege of which they will, of course, be found more and more

anxious to avail themselves as taxation presses on the one side, and

prohibition to the import of the necessaries of life diminishes the

means of paying them on the other.

The repeal of the Corn Laws may give a new lift to England; it may

greatly increase the foreign demand for the produce of its

manufacturing industry; it may invite back a large portion of those

who now spend their incomes in foreign countries, and prevent from

going abroad to reside a vast number who would otherwise go. These

laws must soon be repealed, or England must reduce one or other of

its great establishments--the National Debt, the Church, the Army, or

the Navy. The Corn Laws press upon England just in the same manner as

the discovery of the passage to India by the Cape of Good Hope

pressed upon Venice and the other states whose welfare depended upon

the transit of the produce of India by land. But the navigation of

the Cape benefited all other European nations at the same time that

it pressed upon these particular states, by giving them all the

produce of India at cheaper rates than they would otherwise have got

it, and by opening the markets of India to the produce of all other

European nations. The Corn Laws benefit only one small section of the

people of England, while they weigh, like an incubus, upon the vital

energies of all the rest; and at the same time injure all other

nations by preventing their getting the produce of manufacturing

industry so cheap as they would otherwise get it. They have not,

therefore, the merit of benefiting other nations, at the same time

that they crush their own.[6]

For some twenty or thirty years of our rule, too many of the

collectors of our land revenue in what we call the Western

Provinces,[7] sought the 'bubble reputation' in an increase of

assessment upon the lands of their district every five years when the

settlement was renewed. The more the assessment was increased, the

greater was the praise bestowed upon the collector by the revenue

boards, or the revenue secretary to Government, in the name of the

Governor-General of India.[8] These collectors found an easy mode of

acquiring this reputation--they left the settlements to their native

officers, and shut their ears to all complaints of grievances, till

they had reduced all the landholders of their districts to one common

level of beggary, without stock, character, or credit; and

transferred a great portion of their estates to the native officers

of their own courts through the medium of the auction sales that took

place for the arrears, or pretended arrears, of revenue. A better

feeling has for some years past prevailed, and collectors have sought

their reputation in a real knowledge of their duties, and real good

feeling towards the farmers and cultivators of their districts. For

this better tone of feeling the Western Provinces are, I believe,

chiefly indebted to Mr. R. M. Bird, of the Revenue Board, one of the

most able public officers now in India. A settlement for twenty years

is now in progress that will leave the farmers at least 35 per cent.

upon the gross collections from the immediate cultivators of the

soil; that is, the amount of the revenue demandable by Government

from the estate will be that less than what the farmer will, and

would, under any circumstances, levy from the cultivators in his

detailed settlement.[9]

The farmer lets all the land of his estate out to cultivators, and

takes in money this rate of profit for his expense, trouble, and

risk; or he lets out to the cultivators enough to pay the Government

demand, and tills the rest with his own stock, rent-free. When a

division takes place between his sons, they either divide the estate,

and become each responsible for his particular share, or they divide

the profits, and remain collectively responsible to Government for

the whole, leaving one member of the family registered as the lessee

and responsible head.[10]

In the Ryotwâr System of Southern India, Government officers,

removable at the pleasure of the Government collector, are

substituted for these farmers, or more properly proprietors, of

estates; and a System more prejudicial to the best interests of

society could not well be devised by the ingenuity of man.[11] It has

been supposed by some theorists, who are practically unacquainted

with agriculture in this or any other country, that all who have any

interest in land above the rank of cultivator or ploughman are mere

_drones_, or useless consumers of that rent which, under judicious

management, might be added to the revenues of Government--that all

which they get might, and ought to be, either left with the

cultivators or taken by the Government. At the head of these is the

justly celebrated historian, Mr. Mill. But men who understand the

subject practically know that the intermediate agency of a farmer,

who has a permanent interest in the estate, or an interest for a long

period, is a thousand times better both for the Government and the

people than that of a Government officer of any description, much

less that of one removable at the pleasure of the collector.

Government can always get more revenue from a village under the

management of the farmer; the character of the cultivators and

village community generally is much better; the tillage is much

better; and the produce, from more careful weeding and attention of

all kinds, sells much better in the market. The better character of

the cultivators enables them to get the loans they require to

purchase stock, and to pay the Government demand on more moderate

terms from the capitalists, who rely upon the farmer to aid in the

recovery of their outlays, without reference to civil courts, which

are ruinous media, as well in India as in other places. The farmer or

landlord finds in the same manner that he can get much more from

lands let out on lease to the cultivators or yeomen, who depend upon

their own character, credit, and stock, than he can from similar

lands cultivated with his own stock; and hired labourers can never be

got to labour either so long or so well. The labour of the Indian

cultivating lessee is always applied in the proper quantity, and at

the proper time and place--that of the hired field-labourer hardly

ever is. The skilful coachmaker always puts on the precise quantity

of iron required to make his coach strong, because he knows where it

is required; his coach is, at the same time, as light as it can be

with safety. The unskilful workman either puts on too much, and makes

his coach heavy; or he puts it in the wrong place, and leaves it

weak.

If government extends the twenty years' settlement now in progress to

fifty years or more, they will confer a great blessing upon the

people[12] and they might, perhaps, do it on the condition that the

incumbent consented to allow the lease to descend undivided to his

heirs by the laws of primogeniture. To this condition all classes

would readily agree, for I have heard Hindoo and Muhammadan

landholders all equally lament the evil effects of the laws by which

families are so quickly and inevitably broken up; and say that 'it is

the duty of government to take advantage of their power as the great

proprietor and leaser of all the lands to prevent the evil by

declaring leases indivisible. 'There would then', they say, 'be

always one head to assist in maintaining the widows and orphans of

deceased members, in educating his brothers and nephews; and by his

influence and respectability procuring employment for them.' In such

men, with feelings of permanent interest in their estates, and in the

stability of the government that secured them possession on such

favourable terms, and with the means of educating their children, we

should by and by find our best support, and society its best element.

The law of primogeniture at present prevails only where it is most

mischievous under our rule, among the feudal chiefs, whose ancestors

rose to distinction and acquired their possessions by rapine in times

of invasion and civil wars. This law among them tends to perpetuate

the desire to maintain those military establishments by which the

founders of their families arose, in the hope that the times of

invasion and civil wars may return and open for them a similar field

for exertion. It fosters a class of powerful men, essentially and

irredeemably opposed in feeling, not only to our rule, but to settled

government under any rule; and the sooner the Hindoo law of

inheritance is allowed by the paramount power to take its course

among these feudal chiefs, the better for society. There is always a

strong tendency to it in the desire of the younger brothers to share

in the loaves and fishes; and this tendency is checked only by the

injudicious interposition of our authority.[13]

To give India the advantage of free institutions, or all the

blessings of which she is capable under an enlightened paternal

government, nothing is more essential than the supersession of this

feudal aristocracy by one founded upon other bases, and, above all,

upon that of the concentration of capital in commerce and

manufactures. Nothing tends so much to prevent the accumulation and

concentration of capital over India as this feudal aristocracy which

tends everywhere to destroy that feeling of security without which

men will nowhere accumulate and concentrate it. They do so, not only

by the intrigues and combinations against the paramount power, which

keep alive the dread of internal wars and foreign invasion, but by

those gangs of robbers and murderers which they foster and locate

upon their estates to prey upon the more favoured or better governed

territories around them. From those gangs of freebooters who are to

be found upon the estate of almost every native chief, no

accumulation of movable property of any value is ever for a moment

considered safe, and those who happen to have any such are always in

dread of losing, not only their property, but their lives along with

it, for these gangs, secure in the protection of such chief, are

reckless in their attack, and kill all who happen to come in their

way.[14]

Notes:

1. This phrase is meant to include America.

2. Money-lenders naturally have flourished daring the long period of

internal peace since the Mutiny. They vary in wealth and position

from the humblest 'gombeen man' to the millionaire banker. Many of

these money-lenders are now among the largest owners of land in the

country. Under native rule interests in land were generally too

precarious to be saleable. The author did not foresee that the growth

of private property in land would carry with it the right and desire

of one party to sell and of another to buy, and would thus favour the

growth of large estates, and, to a considerable extent, counteract

the evils of subdivision. Of course, like everything else, the large

estates have their evils too. Much nonsense is written about sales of

land in India, as well as in Ireland. The two countries have more

than the initial letter in common.

3. Theorists declare that it is right that the tax-payers should know

what is taken from them, and that, therefore, direct taxes are best;

but practical men who have to govern ignorant and suspicious races,

resentful of direct taxation, know that indirect taxation is, for

such people, the best.

4. This illustration would give a very false idea of modern Indian

finance.

5. They have no duty to perform as creditors; but as citizens of an

enlightened nation they no doubt perform many of them, very important

ones. [W. H. S.] The author's whimsical comparison between

stockholders and Adam and Eve, and his notion that the creditors of

the nation may be regarded as officials without duties, only obscure

a simple matter. The emigration of owners of Consols never assumed

very alarming dimensions.

6. The Corn Laws were repealed in 1846, and the shilling duty which

was then left was abolished in 1869. Considering that the author

belonged to a land-owning family, his clear perception of the evils

caused by the Corn Laws is remarkable.

7. By the 'Western Provinces' the author means the region called

later the North-Western Provinces, and now known as the Agra Province

in the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh, with the Delhi Territories,

which latter are now partly under the Government of the Panjâb, and

partly in the new small Province, or Chief Commissionership of Delhi.

8. At the time referred to, the provincial Government had not been

constituted.

9. Fifty per cent. may be considered as the average rate left to the

lessees or proprietors of estates under this new settlement; and, if

they take on an average one-third of the gross produce, Government

takes two-ninths. But we may rate the Government share of the produce

actually taken at one-fifth as the maximum, and one-tenth as the

minimum. [W. H. S.]

It is unfortunately true that in the short-term settlements made

previous to 1833 many abuses of the kinds referred to in the text

occurred. The traditions of the people and the old records attest

numerous instances. The first serious attempt to reform the system of

revenue settlements was made by Regulation VII of 1822, but, owing to

an excessive elaboration of procedure, the attempt produced no

appreciable results. Regulation IX of 1833 established a workable

system, and provided for the appointment of Indian Deputy Collectors

with adequate powers. The settlements of the North-Western Provinces

made under this Regulation were, for the most part, reasonably fair,

and were generally confirmed for a period of thirty years. Mr. Robert

Mertins Bird, who entered the service in 1805, and died in 1853, took

a leading part in this great reform. When the next settlements were

made, between 1860 and 1880, the share of the profit rental claimed

by the State was reduced from two-thirds to one-half. Full details

will be found in the editor's _Settlement Officer's Manual for the N.

W. P._ (Allahabad, 1882), or in Baden Powell's big book, _Land

Systems of British India_ (Clarendon Press, 1892).

10. Since 1833 the people whom the author calls 'farmers' have

gradually become fall proprietors, subject to the Government lien on

the land and its produce for the land revenue. For many years past

the ancient custom of joint ownership and collective responsibility

has been losing ground. Partitions are now continually demanded, and

every year collective responsibility is becoming more unpopular and

more difficult to enforce.

11. This judgement, I need hardly say, would not be accepted in

Madras or Bombay. The issue raised is too large for discussion in

footnotes.

12. The advantages of very long terms of settlements are obvious; the

disadvantages, though equally real, are less obvious. Fluctuations in

prices, and above all, in the price of silver, are among the many

conditions which complicate the question. Except the Bengal

landowners, most people now admit that the Permanent Settlement of

Bengal in 1793 was a grievous mistake. It is also admitted that the

mistake is irrevocable.

13. These two suggestions of the author that the law of primogeniture

should be established to regulate the succession to ordinary estates,

and that it should be abolished in the case of chieftainships, where

it already prevails, are obviously open to criticism. It seems

sufficient to say that both recommendations are, for many reasons,

altogether impracticable. In passing, I may note that the term

'feudal' does not express with any approach to correctness the

relation of the Native States to the Government of India.

14. The evils described in this paragraph, though diminished, have

not disappeared. Nevertheless, no one would now seriously propose the

deliberate supersession of the existing aristocracy by rich merchants

and manufacturers. The proposal is too fanciful for discussion.

During the long period of peace merchants and manufacturers have

naturally risen to a position much more prominent than they occupied

in the author's time.

CHAPTER 73

Meerut--Anglo-Indian Society.

Meerut is a large station for military and civil establishments; it

is the residence of a civil commissioner, a judge, a magistrate, a

collector of land revenue, and all their assistants and

establishments. There are the Major-General commanding the division;

the Brigadier commanding the station; four troops of horse and a

company of foot artillery; one regiment of European cavalry, one of

European infantry, one of native cavalry, and three of native

infantry.[1] It is justly considered the healthiest station in India,

for both Europeans and natives,[2] and I visited it in the latter end

of the cold, which is the healthiest, season of the year; yet the

European ladies were looking as if they had all come out of their

graves, and talking of the necessity of going off to the mountains to

renovate, as soon as the hot weather should set in. They had

literally been fagging themselves to death with gaiety, at this the

gayest and most delightful of all Indian stations, during the cold

months when they ought to have been laying in a store of strength to

carry them through the trying seasons of the hot winds and rains. Up

every night and all night at balls and suppers, they could never go

out to breathe the fresh air of the morning; and were looking

wretchedly ill, while the European soldiers from the barracks seemed

as fresh as if they had never left their native land. There is no

doubt that sitting up late at night is extremely prejudicial to the

health of Europeans in India.[3] I have never seen the European, male

or female, that could stand it long, however temperate in habits; and

an old friend of mine once told me that if he went to bed a little

exhilarated every night at ten o'clock, and took his ride in the

morning, he found himself much better than if he sat up till twelve

or one o'clock without drinking, and lay abed in the mornings. Almost

all the gay pleasures of India are enjoyed at night, and as ladies

here, as everywhere else in Christian societies, are the life and

soul of all good parties, as of all good novels, they often to oblige

others sit up late, much against their own inclinations, and even

their judgements, aware as they are that they are gradually sinking

under the undue exertions.

When I first came to India there were a few ladies of the old school

still much looked up to in Calcutta, and among the rest the

grandmother of the Earl of Liverpool, the old Bêgam Johnstone, then

between seventy and eighty years of age.[4] All these old ladies

prided themselves upon keeping up old usages. They use to dine in the

afternoon at four or five o'clock--take their airing after dinner in

their carriages; and from the time they returned till ten at night

their houses were lit up in their best style and thrown open for the

reception of visitors. All who were on visiting terms came at this

time, with any strangers whom they wished to introduce, and enjoyed

each other's society; there were music and dancing for the young, and

cards for the old, when the party assembled happened to be large

enough; and a few who had been previously invited stayed supper. I

often visited the old Bêgam Johnstone at this hour, and met at her

house the first people in the country, for all people, including the

Governor-General himself, delighted to honour this old lady, the

widow of a Governor-General of India, and the mother-in-law of a

Prime Minister of England.[5] She was at Murshîdâbâd when Sirâj-ud-

daula marched from that place at the head of the army that took and

plundered Calcutta, and caused so many Europeans to perish in the

Black Hole; and she was herself saved from becoming a member of his

seraglio, or perishing with the lest, by the circumstance of her

being far gone in her pregnancy, which caused her to be made over to

a Dutch factory.[6]

She had been a very beautiful woman, and had been several times

married; the pictures of all her husbands being hung round her noble

drawing-room in Calcutta, covered during the day with crimson cloth

to save them from the dust, and uncovered at night only on particular

occasions. One evening Mrs. Crommelin, a friend of mine, pointing to

one of them, asked the old lady his name. 'Really, I cannot at this

moment tell you, my dear; my memory is very bad,' (striking her

forehead with her right hand, as she leaned with her left arm in Mrs.

Crommelin's,) 'but I shall recollect in a few minutes.' The old

lady's last husband was a clergyman, Mr. Johnstone, whom she found

too gay, and persuaded to go home upon an annuity of eight hundred a

year, which she settled upon him for life. The bulk of her fortune

went to Lord Liverpool; the rest to her grandchildren, the Ricketts,

Watts, and others.

Since those days the modes of intercourse in India have much altered.

Society at all the stations beyond the three capitals of Calcutta,

Madras, and Bombay, is confined almost exclusively to the members of

the civil and military services, who seldom remain long at the same

station--the military officers hardly ever more than three years, and

the civil hardly ever so long. At disagreeable stations the civil

servants seldom remain so many months. Every newcomer calls in the

forenoon upon all that are at the station when he arrives, and they

return his call at the same hour soon after. If he is a married man,

the married men upon whom he has called take their wives to call upon

his; and he takes his to return the call of theirs. These calls are

all indispensable; and being made in the forenoon, become very

disagreeable in the hot season; all complain of them, yet no one

forgoes his claim upon them; and till the claim is fulfilled, people

will not recognize each other as acquaintances.[7] Unmarried officers

generally dine in the evening, because it is a more convenient hour

for the mess; and married civil functionaries do the same, because it

is more convenient for their office work. If you invite those who

dine at that hour to spend the evening with you, you must invite them

to dinner, even in the hot weather; and if they invite you, it is to

dinner. This makes intercourse somewhat heavy at all times, but more

especially so in the hot season, when a table covered with animal

food is sickening to any person without a keen appetite, and

stupefying to those who have it. No one thinks of inviting people to

a dinner and ball--it would be vandalism; and when you invite them,

as is always the case, to come after dinner, the ball never begins

till late at night, and seldom ends till late in the morning. With

all its disadvantages, however, I think dining in the evening much

better for those who are in health, than dining in the afternoon,

provided people can avoid the intermediate meal of tiffin. No person

in India should eat animal food more than once a day; and people who

dine in the evening generally eat less than they would if they dined

in the afternoon. A light breakfast at nine; biscuit, or a slice of

toast with a glass of water, or soda-water, at two o'clock, and

dinner after the evening exercise, is the plan which I should

recommend every European to adopt as the most agreeable.[8] When

their digestive powers get out of order, people must do as the

doctors tell them.

There is, I believe, no society in which there is more real urbanity

of manners than in that of India--a more general disposition on the

part of its different members to sacrifice their own comforts and

conveniences to those of others, and to make those around them happy,

without letting them see that it costs them an effort to do so.[9]

There is assuredly no society where the members are more generally

free from those corroding cares and anxieties which 'weigh upon the

hearts' of men whose incomes are precarious, and position in the

world uncertain. They receive their salaries on a certain day every

month, whatever may be the state of the seasons or of trade; they pay

no taxes; they rise in the several services by rotation;[10]

religious feelings and opinions are by common consent left as a

question between man and his Maker; no one ever thinks of questioning

another about them, nor would he be tolerated if he did so. Most

people take it for granted that those which they got from their

parents were the right ones; and as such they cherish them. They

remember with feelings of filial piety the prayers which they in

their infancy offered to their Maker, while kneeling by the side of

their mothers; and they continue to offer them up through life, with

the same feelings and the same hopes.[11]

Differences of political opinion, which agitate society so much in

England and other countries where every man believes that his own

personal interests must always be more or less affected by the

predominance of one party over another, are no doubt a source of much

interest to people in India, but they scarcely ever excite any angry

passions among them. The tempests by which the political atmosphere

of the world is cleared and purged of all its morbid influences burst

not upon us--we see them at a distance--we know that they are working

for all mankind; and we feel for those who boldly expose themselves

to their 'pitiless peltings' as men feel for the sailors whom they

suppose to be exposed on the ocean to the storm, while they listen to

it from their beds or winter firesides.[12] We discuss all political

opinions, and all the great questions which they affect, with the

calmness of philosophers; not without emotion certainly, but without

passion; we have no share in returning members to parliament--we feel

no dread of those injuries, indignities, and calumnies to which those

who have are too often exposed; and we are free from the bitterness

of feelings which always attend them.[13]

How exalted, how glorious, has been the destiny of England, to spread

over so vast a portion of the globe her literature, her language, and

her free institutions! How ought the sense of this high destiny to

animate her sons in their efforts to perfect their institutions which

they have formed by slow degrees from feudal barbarism; to make them

in reality as perfect as they would have them appear to the world to

be in theory, that rising nations may love and honour the source

whence they derive theirs, and continue to look to it for

improvement.

We return to the society of our wives and children after the labours

of the day are over, with tempers unruffled by collision with

political and religious antagonists, by unfavourable changes in the

season and the markets, and the other circumstances which affect so

much the incomes and prospects of our friends at home. We must look

to them for the chief pleasures of our lives, and know that they must

look to us for theirs; and if anything has crossed us we try to

conceal it from them. There is in India a strong feeling of mutual

dependence which prevents little domestic misunderstandings between

man and wife from growing into quarrels so often as in other

countries, where this is less prevalent. Men have not here their

clubs, nor their wives their little coteries to fly to when disposed

to make serious matters out of trifles, and both are in consequence

much inclined to bear and forbear. There are, of course, on the other

hand, evils in India that people have not to contend with at home;

but, on the whole, those who are disposed to look on the fair, as

well as on the dark side of all around them, can enjoy life in India

very much, as long as they and those dear to them are free from

physical pain.[14] We everywhere find too many disposed to look upon

the dark side of all that is present, and the bright side of all that

is distant in time and place--always miserable themselves, be they

where they will, and making all around them miserable; this commonly

arises from indigestion, and the habit of eating and drinking in a

hot, as in a cold, climate; and giving their stomachs too much to do,

as if they were the only parts of the human frame whose energies were

unrelaxed by the temperature of tropical climates.

There is, however, one great defect in Anglo-Indian society; it is

composed too exclusively of the servants of government, civil,

military, and ecclesiastic, and wants much of the freshness, variety,

and intelligence of cultivated societies otherwise constituted. In

societies where capital is concentrated for employment in large

agricultural, commercial, and manufacturing establishments, those who

possess and employ it form a large portion of the middle and higher

classes. They require the application of the higher branches of

science to the efficient employment of their capital in almost every

purpose to which it can be applied; and they require, at the same

time, to show that they are not deficient in that conventional

learning of the schools and drawing-rooms to which the circles they

live and move in attach importance. In such societies we are,

therefore, always coming in contact with men whose scientific

knowledge is necessarily very precise, and at the same time very

extensive, while their manners and conversation are of the highest

polish. There is, perhaps, nothing which strikes a gentleman from

India so much on his entering a society differently constituted, as

the superior precision of men's information upon scientific subjects;

and more especially upon that of the sciences more immediately

applicable to the arts by which the physical enjoyments of men are

produced, prepared, and distributed all over the world. Almost all

men in India feel that too much of their time before they left

England was devoted to the acquisition of the dead languages; and too

little to the study of the elements of science. The time lost can

never be regained--at least they think so, which is much the same

thing. Had they been well grounded in the elements of physics,

physiology, and chemistry before they left their native land, they

would have gladly devoted their leisure to the improvement of their

knowledge; but to go back to elements, where elements can be learnt

only from books, is, unhappily, what so few can bring themselves to,

that no man feels ashamed of acknowledging that he has never studied

them at all till he returns to England, or enters a society

differently constituted, and finds that he has lost the support of

the great majority that always surrounded him in India.[15] It will,

perhaps, be said that the members of the official aristocracy of all

countries have more or less of the same defects, for certain it is

that they everywhere attach paramount or undue importance to the

conventional learning of the grammar-school and the drawing-room, and

the ignorant and the indolent have everywhere the support of a great

majority. Johnson has, however, observed:

'But the truth is that the knowledge of external nature and the

sciences, which that knowledge requires or includes, are not the

great or the frequent business of the human mind. Whether we provide

for action or conversation, whether we wish to be useful or pleasing,

the first requisite is the religious and moral knowledge of right and

wrong; the next is an acquaintance with the history of mankind, and

with those examples which may be said to embody truth, and prove by

events the reasonableness of opinions.[16] Prudence and justice are

virtues and excellences of all times, and of all places--we are

perpetually moralists; but we are geometricians only by chance. Our

intercourse with intellectual nature is necessary; our speculations

upon matter are voluntary and at leisure. Physiological learning is

of such rare emergence, that one may know another half his life,

without being able to estimate his skill in hydrostatics or

astromony; but his moral and prudential character immediately

appears. Those authors, therefore, are to be read at schools that

supply most axioms of prudence, most principles of moral truth, and

most materials for conversation; and these purposes are best served

by poets, orators, and historians' (_Life of Milton_).

Notes:

1. In India officers have much better opportunities in time of peace

to learn how to handle troops than in England, from having them more

concentrated in large stations, with fine open plains to exercise

upon. During the whole of the cold season, from the beginning of

November to the end of February, the troops are at large stations

exercised in brigades, and the artillery, cavalry, and infantry

together. [W. H. S.] The normal garrison of Meerut in recent years

has consisted of one British cavalry regiment, one battalion of

British infantry, one native cavalry regiment, and one battalion of

native infantry, with two batteries of horse and two of field

artillery. The cantonment was established in 1806, from which date

the town grew rapidly in size and population. The civil staff has

been largely increased since Sleeman's time by the addition of

numerous officers belonging to irrigation and other departmental

services which did not exist in his day. The offices of District

Magistrate and Collector have been united as a single person for many

years.

2. The cantonments suffered severely from typhoid fever for several

years in the latter part of the nineteenth century.

3. Few Anglo-Indians will dispute the truth of this dictum.

4. The late Earl of Liverpool, then Mr. Jenkinson, married this old

lady's daughter. He was always very attentive to her, and she used

with feelings of great pride and pleasure to display the contents of

the boxes of millinery which he used every year to send out to her.

[W. H. 8.] The author came out to India in 1809. Mr. Charles

Jenkinson was created Baron Hawkesbury in 1786, and Earl of Liverpool

in 1796. His first wife, who died in 1770, was Amelia, daughter of

Mr. William Watts, Governor of Fort William, and of the lady

described by the author. Their only son succeeded to the earldom in

1808, and died in 1828. The peerage became extinct on the death of

the third earl in 1851. (Burke's _Peerage_.) It was revived in 1905.

5. Lord Liverpool, the second earl, became Prime Minister in 1812,

after the murder of Perceval. Mrs. Johnson (not Johnstone) was not

'the widow of a Governor-General of India'. Her history is told in

detail on her tombstone in St. John's churchyard, Calcutta, and is

summarized in Buckland, _Dictionary of Indian Biography_ (1906). She

was born in 1725, and died in 1812. She had four husbands, namely (l)

Parry Purple Temple, whom she married when she was only thirteen

years of age; (2) James Altham, who died of smallpox a few days after

his marriage; (3) William Watts, Senior Member of Council, and for a

short time Governor or President of Fort William in 1758; (4) in 1774

Rev. William Johnson, who became principal chaplain of Fort William

in 1784, and left India in 1788. She was known as 'the old Begum ',

and her epitaph asserts that she was when she died 'the oldest

British resident in Bengal, universally beloved, respected, and

revered'. Mr. A. L. Paul kindly communicated the full text of the

inscription on her tomb, with some additional notes. The author met

her in 1810, when she was about eighty-five years of age.

6. The tragedy of the Black Hole occurred in June, 1756.

7. Of late years the rigour of the custom exacting midday calls has

been relaxed in some places.

8. Moat people would require some training before they could find

this very abstemious regimen 'the most agreeable'.

9. It will, I hope, be admitted that this observation still holds

good.

10. When the author wrote the rupee was worth more than two

shillings, the members of the Indian services were few in number, and

mostly well paid, while living was cheap. Now all is changed. The

rupee has an artificial value of 1_s_. 4_d_., the members of the

services are numerous and often ill paid, while living is dear. The

sharp fall in the value of silver, and consequently in the gold

equivalent of the rupee, began in 1874. 'Corroding cares and

anxieties' are now the lot of most people who serve in India. They

now have the privilege of paying taxes.

11. This perfect religious freedom, still generally characteristic of

Anglo-Indian society, is one of its greatest charms; and the charms

of the country do not increase.

12. The author probably had in his mind the famous lines of

Lucretius:-

Suave, mari magno turbantibus aequora ventis,

E terra magnum alterius spectare laborem;

Non quia vexari quemquam 'st jucunda voluptas,

Sed, quibus ipse malis careas, quia cernere suave 'st.

(Book II, line 1.)

13. This delightful philosophic calm is no longer an Anglo-Indian

possession; nor can the modern Indian official congratulate himself

on his immunity from 'injuries, indignities, and calumnies'.

14. There are now clubs everywhere, and coteries are said to be not

unknown. Few Anglo-Indians of the present day are able to share the

author's cheery optimism.

15. In this matter also time has wrought great changes. The

scientific branches of the Indian services, the medical, engineering,

forestry, geological survey, and others, have greatly developed, and

many officials, in India, whether of European or Indian race, now

occupy high places in the world of science.

16. Compare Bolingbroke's observation, already quoted, that 'history

is philosophy teaching by example'.

Rambles and Recollections of an Indian Official · 第 89 / 91 章