CHAPTER I.

CLENDENEN’S

DETECTIVE

MANUAL

How to Become a

Successful Detective

RUFUS H. CLENDENEN

CHARLESTON, W. VA.

Copyright 1922

by Rufus H. Clendenen

LOVETT PRINTING COMPANY PRESS

CHARLESTON, W. VA.

[Illustration]

[Illustration: RUFUS H. CLENDENEN]

INTRODUCTION

Of all the characters that come into the minds of writers, there is

probably none that has been so thoroughly dramatic as the detective,

unless it should be the crook with whom the detective deals.

The deeds of the underworld have a fascination for the most of us, and

the detective who finds his way into them by the golden thread of his

ingeniousness and unravels them, in our mind is the hero of romance

and the guardian of the law abiding public. He reveals the mystery,

apprehends or arrests and assists in the conviction of those who are

regarded as the worst enemies of society.

To my mind, as well as thousands of others, the detection of crime and

the “hunt” for the criminal is one of the most fascinating callings in

which a man can engage. I believe I am safe in saying that every man

has a desire, something within him calling out, to try and unravel some

mysterious crime.

This work is based upon careful study of the highest recognized

authorities on the subject. Its purpose is to present in a clear,

connected and forcible manner the knowledge obtained from twenty-two

years in the detective profession.

It is hoped that this treatise may satisfy the most thoughtful and

experienced officers and that it may be also of special interest and

profit to the new beginner, the more experienced officers and members

of police departments.

The story section deals with actual facts and experiences in the

mountains of West Virginia.

This being a book of facts and recounting some of my experiences in

the detective profession, I sincerely hope that it will meet with the

approval of all officers of the law and have a full reading from that

portion of the public who are interested in perplexing problems dealing

with the underworld of crime.

Respectfully,

RUFUS H. CLENDENEN.

CHAPTER I.

The Detective Profession in Full.

The detection of crime, and consequent pursuit and apprehension of the

criminal, is one of the most fascinating vocations in which men engage.

At least once in every normal man’s lifetime there comes the desire

to engage in unraveling mysterious crimes. At least seventy-five per

cent of the American people are inclined to attempt to unravel some

mysterious matter at some time. The motives which lead men to become

detectives may be a desire for personal glory, to win the rich rewards

which are often offered for the arrest and conviction of some criminal,

or simply the love of the chase, which is so deeply rooted in every

real man’s makeup. While every man may desire to become a detective,

but few men are really fitted to succeed in a calling which demands so

many qualities, both natural and acquired.

So many young men who are not educated make the mistake of their

life by taking a correspondence course in some detective school

which furnishes him with a little tin badge, a diploma, a card of

introduction and a large quantity of worthless literature. These men I

term “badge flashers” and “five-dollar detectives”. In my office in the

City of Charleston, West Virginia, you will find a sign over my door

which reads as follows:

“NOTICE: ‘Badge Flashers’ and ‘$5.00 Detectives’, who are

trained men, save your time. We cannot use you. (Signed) The

Clendenen Detective System.”

To be a detective, a man need not possess the physical qualifications

which would fit him to meet the requirements of a patrolman or police

officer. Many of the city detectives are recruited from the ranks of

the patrolman and police officers, but there are many others who step

directly into the ranks. While physical standards are more elastic than

for patrolmen, they are rigid in this regard that extreme types are

not wanted. The man who is very tall or very short attracts attention

easily.

Any defect such as lameness, facial disfigurement, defect of speech, or

eccentricity of manner provide an inseparable bar to success for the

would-be detective, especially in police work; in private work these

defects are not so material. The physically normal are best fitted

to avoid attracting attention. Many absurd notions prevail about the

detective makeup, such as the ability to assume numerous disguises and

impersonate numerous characters. Nothing could be farther from the

truth. The best of all disguises is no disguise at all, but simply

the ability to go quietly about one’s business without revealing to

onlookers what that business is. “The Old Sleuth”, “Nick Carter”,

“Old King Brady”, “Diamond Dick”, “Pluck and Luck”, and all five and

ten cent detective story books make interesting reading, but the real

detective who would attempt to use such methods would be laughed at

as much by the underworld as by his fellow officers. Physical fitness

is not the only qualification of the successful detective. He must

have stability of moral character which will withstand the severest

tests. He must be not only “as honest as the day is long” but also as

honest as the night is longer. His word must be as good as his bond.

A reputation for absolute honesty is acquired only by the sternest

adherence to the principles of a square deal. Temptations to dishonesty

are almost daily occurrences in the detective’s life. It is a common

practice for detected criminals to offer bribes for immunity from

arrest. It is common knowledge in some cities that gambling houses,

houses of prostitution, moonshining dens and bootlegging joints set

aside a regular per cent of their earnings for the police. The young

beginner or an experienced officer who once accepts a bribe for evading

his plain duty can no longer lay claim to the title of an honest man.

People who commit the above depredations are as thoroughly organized

as the officers whose duty is to apprehend them, and when an officer

accepts a bribe from any of these clansmen he must thereafter protect

them or any of their associates.

Such acts are cumulative in their effects, leading eventually to almost

inevitable exposure, arrest, conviction and disgrace. The awful and,

in one sense, pitiable example given by Lieutenant Becker of the New

York Police Force, should be sufficient to warn the young beginner of

falling into these pitfalls or taking his first dishonest step.

A reputation for truthfulness is another essential of a man who wishes

to rise in the detective profession. Very often the prosecuting

attorney depends almost wholly upon the evidence given by the detective

for a conviction, and if the detective’s veracity is questioned it

leads invariably to acquittal, where, on the other hand, a conviction

could have been had. Judges and juries are quick to detect the shifty,

evasive manner of the man who is not telling the truth. Witnesses who

are intimidated through fear of retaliation must be convinced of the

reliability of the officer who has promised protection.

Even criminals are more apt to yield peacefully to the man who is

known as a man of his word. Last, but not least, the man above soon

learns upon whom he may rely and keeps that man in mind when there is a

vacancy higher up.

A little reflection will convince anyone that sobriety is one of the

essentials of success. The temptation to drink, to associate with lewd

women and to frequent such dives, to mingle with the boys in a social

round of drinks, and to be known as “a good fellow” gives one a strong

hand with enemies of the underworld only; but to succeed as an officer

of the law, this must be resisted. One need not be a temperance crank,

inflicting his views upon others and all comers, but the detective,

must of all men be ever on the alert, quick to think and act. He must

keep his vision clear and his brain unclouded by all drugs and liquors.

The detective must be a constant student if he intends to rise in

his profession. He is often pitted against men who have made crime

a study and a profession, and many of the criminal class are men who

have occupied high places. The officer must be able to meet all classes

and conditions of men upon a common level. It is easy to imitate the

man below, but difficult to mingle with the upper class if you are

not fitted by education to meet them on a common level. The really

dangerous criminal is the one who is educated. Many of them are

graduates of colleges and universities. Some of them move in excellent

society. The detective in his profession must be able to mingle with

the masses and all classes. A knowledge of music, art, literature, the

natural sciences and mathematics are of great worth to the aspiring

detective. The ordinary officer who plods along in others’ footsteps

may be honest, sober and truthful, but he will never rise until he

looks upon his profession as a science to be thoroughly studied and

understood.

It is very essential to his success that he have an elementary

knowledge of toxic chemistry, electricity and surgery. He must have

a thorough knowledge of explosives, firearms and the tools peculiar

to the profession of burglars. There are numerous qualities for the

successful detective, such as unquestioned loyalty, the deference

to superiors, obedience, neatness, pride, courtesy to inferior as

well as superior, unlimited patience, attention to detail and that

elusive quality, manliness. Space forbids a complete discussion of

these qualities, therefore, we shall begin the discussion of the more

technical assets of the detective profession.

What constitutes a crime? When does a man or woman cross the line and

become liable to arrest?

The laws of states and nations vary widely in regard to lesser crimes,

but the more important crimes are similar under the laws of all

civilized nations. Minor offenses may be illegal in one country and

allowed in another. The detective must be conversant with the laws of

his state and nation and also have a general knowledge of the laws of

all nations.

The major crimes are classified as offenses against the person, such

as assault, rape, homicide; offenses against security of peace and

property, such as arson, blackmail, extortion, larceny, burglary,

robbery; and offenses against the state and public morals, such as

anarchy, adultery, bigamy, bribery and perjury.

Arson is one of the most difficult crimes in which to secure a

conviction for the reason that the evidence is usually destroyed.

Evidence must be secured which will prove that there really was a fire

and that it was planned.

Assault may be felonious or simple. Simple assault may be left to the

patrolman. Felonious assaults are generally qualified by the words

“with intent to kill”, and as such are serious. The weapon with which

the assault was committed is an extremely important bit of evidence

and should be secured and identified in the presence of witnesses if

possible.

Rape is a crime for the police to handle and violations of the “Mann

Act” are generally handled by Federal officers of long experience.

Bigamy is a case for the detective, as the gathering of evidence of a

former marriage must generally be secured in a different locality from

that in which the crime was committed. Evidence consists of proof of a

former marriage, proof of identity and proof that there has not been a

divorce.

The crime of blackmail is becoming of great importance because of the

nation-wide operations of organized gangs. Securing evidence is made

more difficult because of the reticence of the victim. Close and clever

shadowing of the suspected person is necessary in order to secure

evidence. It is in securing evidence against blackmailers that the

“Third Degree” is partially justified, as a confession from one of the

gang is of prime importance.

Bribery is one of the most common crimes. Evidence consists of marked

money used, eye witnesses, dictagraph records and flash photographs of

the act itself. Pre-knowledge of the crime is essential or evidence

cannot be secured.

Larceny, robbery and burglary are crimes which call for considerable

experience in the securing of evidence. Pawn shops and “Fences” must be

watched constantly. Safe burglars are the worst of the lot, exceeding

in importance even the “Dutch House Men”. They have many tricks never

used by house men. The detective must become familiar with the tricks

of the regulars and must distinguish the professional from the amateur

job at a glance. Burglars generally stick to one phase of burglary and

may easily be known by some personal peculiarity of operation. Loft,

store, store window, house, flat, bank or office thieves are each a

study of themselves and not to be confused. The detective must become

familiar with the various tools used by burglars and the manner of

their use.

Homicide--“to kill by act, by procurement or by omission”--furnishes

one of the most frequent cases for the detective bureau. In homicide

cases it is absolutely essential that the identity of the body be

established. The “_Corpus Delicti_” must be established. The

clothing of the victim is often of prime importance. If a pistol was

used, empty shells and the ball or balls are evidence. If possible an

ante-mortem statement should be secured. The position of the body,

furniture, etc., must be noted that you may be able to paint a verbal

picture of the crime. Do not become disheartened if a clue does not

prove right when followed. Scotland Yard men succeed often because of

their bulldog tenacity, the Swiss because of their patiently minute

measurements; the Germans because of their rigid classification of

all citizens and strangers; the French because of their brilliancy

of deduction, and the American because he uses all of their methods

supplemented by native shrewdness and observation.

Evidence may be direct, cumulative, circumstantial or hearsay. The

detective should make a careful study of these forms and their

importance in order that sufficient evidence to convict may be secured.

A careful study of the evidence given at important trials will aid

greatly in determining the importance of evidence. The Thaw case, the

Leo Frank case, the Marion Lambert case and others of like importance

should be carefully studied as they are replete with valuable pointers

in the securing of reliable evidence.

In securing evidence it will often be found that witnesses will talk

freely under the influence of excitement but become more and more

uncommunicative when the excitement wears off. Witnesses at times

fear revenge, injury to business or notoriety; it is the detective’s

duty to inspire confidence in the timid witness. The officer must

be possessed of infinite patience and tact in order to get at the

real facts. A brusque, harsh, intimidating manner rarely succeeds in

getting witnesses to tell the whole truth. Little things must not be

overlooked. Often things unimportant in themselves become of prime

importance when they become one link in a chain of evidence. The best

way to arrange the evidence is to keep a memorandum book in which is

set down the points as discovered, then at your leisure you can arrange

your facts and get their relative bearings on the case in point. Under

these headings may come facts bearing upon the victim’s life history,

family affairs, time of the assault, weapon used, eye witnesses, if

there be any, and any suggestive features of the case which have a

bearing on the criminal’s identity. Deduction and observation are the

twin aids in the unraveling of crime.

What powers of arrest have the detective? A warrant is always

sufficient power but a warrant cannot always be procured in time. The

detective has the following powers of summary arrest:

1. For a crime committed or attempted in his presence.

2. When the person arrested has committed a felony, although not

in his presence.

3. When a felony has in fact been committed and he has

reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have

committed it.

4. A non-resident may be arrested for a crime committed out of

the state on receipt of a telegram from the authorities of the

place where the crime was committed.

When the officer’s attention is called to the commission of a crime he

must act quickly. It is not possible to consult a reference in regard

to the powers of arrest. The detective must know the limitations of his

powers and must be careful not to go beyond them. Every person must

be informed of the reason for his arrest unless he is arrested in the

actual commission of a crime or after a chase immediately following.

Whenever the officer is permitted to make an arrest he is permitted to

use sufficient force to effect it. Brutal methods, however, are frowned

upon by the courts. Fugitives from justice may be arrested for a crime

committed in another state if such a crime is punishable in the state

where the arrest is made. Detective departments of states and nations

are usually glad to co-operate in the apprehension of criminals.

Crimes like homicide, arson, burglary, etc., are as old as the world

but new developments of civilization bring with them new crimes and

new types of criminals. Piracy is an extremely old crime but train

robberies were unheard of until trains began to run.

Civilization has become too complex for such hard riding bandits as

the James Boys or the Dalton Gang to flourish, but a newer and more

dangerous type has arisen in the automobile bandit. The Apaches of

Paris took to the automobile like a duck to water. Bold and daring

criminals of the United States were quick to see the advantages of the

automobile in committing crime. By its use a safe may be cracked in

the country bank and before morning the robbers be secure in some city

miles away, leaving no trace behind them. The best trained bloodhound

is helpless when put upon the trail of the auto. Here is a chance for

the ambitious detective to win name and fame for himself by devising

some means for pursuing and identifying the automobile bandit.

Criminals have always kept just a little ahead of the men who make a

business of detecting and preventing crime. Safe manufacturers are kept

on their mettle to devise a safe which is really burglar-proof. The

cracksmen generally laugh at their efforts. The criminal is quick to

make use of new inventions. He readily discards his “can opener” and

bottle of “soup” for the quieter and more efficient electric machine

which eats through the heaviest steel door with neatness and dispatch.

The Maxim Silencer and the automatic pistol were quickly adopted by

the criminal class. The small fry such as the “dip”, the “moll buzzer”

and package thief may be left to the tender mercies of the precinct

man but the really efficient detective must equip himself to engage in

a battle of wits with criminals who make crimes a profession. He must

keep abreast of the times, he must be cognizant of all the newer tricks

of the criminal class and must find means to circumvent them. It is not

sufficient to be as efficient as the other fellows--he must be more

efficient. His work must stand in a class by itself.

He who would engage in the calling of the detective, in any one of its

various phases, must be content to begin at the bottom and work his way

upward by means of unremitting study and observation. He must possess

a multitude of qualifications if he wishes to rise in his profession.

He must be able to write reports which are models of neatness, accuracy

and brevity. He is expected to know as much law as the lawyer, as

much medicine and surgery as the doctor, as much chemistry as the

chemist, as much psychology as the psychologist, as much science as

the scientist. Above all other special knowledge he must know men.

He must be able to best the gambler at his own game. Poker, faro,

roulette, crap and stud are easy picking for the trained man. He must

be familiar with the back rooms of saloons and the various and somewhat

devious methods of the liquor dealers without himself becoming an

habitual drinker. He must co-operate with the various city departments

in maintaining law and order without becoming mixed in the schemes of

the petty politicians who infest those departments. He must be familiar

with the location and activities of the houses of prostitution without

becoming morally corrupt. He must be stern without becoming brutal,

be well read without becoming a book worm, be moral and sober without

being a reformer, be good without becoming “good for nothing” by being

too good, be athletic without developing muscle at the expense of mind,

and be a mixer without becoming a loafer. He must be possessed of the

cardinal virtues of honesty, truthfulness, sobriety and patience, and

supplement the negative virtues with the positive ones of physical

fitness, mental alertness, extraordinary powers of observation,

facility in rapid deduction, ability to identify the various types of

criminals at a glance and complete familiarity with the various modes

of operation of the criminal class.

The history of the detection of crime contains amazingly few names

of detectives who have distinguished themselves because of their

discoveries or inventions. Of living detectives in the United

States, William J. Burns and W. A. Pinkerton are the only ones who

have achieved greatness, the former having been recently appointed

by President Harding as Chief of the United States Secret Service.

Pinkerton achieved greatness more because of his executive ability than

because of his ability in apprehending criminals. Burns has not used

sensational methods but has reached his present high place because of

his ability to read the souls of men.

I have set a high mark, but it should not discourage the man ambitious

to succeed. Success is not won in a single day. Success is the result

of long years of patient endeavor and is reached more often through

strenuous striving than through native ability. The man who is bound

to succeed cannot be kept down. He will carve name and fame for himself

in spite of the greatest obstacles.

[Illustration]

Clendenen's detective manual · 第 1 / 17 章