A few points call for especial notice:--

Very many of the _Catholic_ journals have taken their stand against the

late scenes at Treves. It is true, that several of those Journals may

have been actuated by secondary motives in so doing, or what is the

notorious fact, that some, at least of such Journals, want almost

entirely a religious character; and though Catholic in name, are infidel

in fact. Still it is equally notorious, that several of the Catholic

Journals, whose orthodoxy is above suspicion, have lifted up their

voice against what has taken place, as scandalous to Christianity, and

eminently perilous to the Church.

In addition to the discussions which have appeared in the public

prints, a vast mass of pamphlets has been issued on both sides. The

most remarkable of these is, one issued by two professors in Bonn,

_Gildermeister and Sybel_ (the latter a Catholic,) entering into a

grave and learned historical inquiry as to the genuineness of the relic,

exposing in the most triumphant manner the various defences which have

appeared on the Catholic side,--and all characterized by the most severe

sarcasm, in holding up the trumpery of the system of relic-worship to

contempt. The title of the book is "_The Holy Coat of Treves, and the

twenty other Holy Coats_." A second edition was soon called for, in

which four other such relics were stated as discovered. It is generally

known, that among these numerous claimants for genuineness, the great

body of the French clergy have bid hard to prove that the Coat of

Argenteuil is the genuine one; and this view has been warmly defended by

one of the Catholic clergy of Einsiedeln in Switzerland--notoriously

one of the most celebrated places of pilgrimage in the world. More than

this, writings have appeared stating the events connected with the other

relics of the same name, and treasured with equal sanctity in numerous

Cathedrals; also giving an account of the separate and independent

series of miracles wrought by each as the true Coat of the Lord. It

would be tedious to detain the reader with more of such details. We

desire merely to notice the various workings of the movement in and out

of the Catholic Church. It may accordingly suffice to state in addition,

that poetry as well as prose has been called into requisition, and

that satirical ballads and lyrics have been numerously circulated,

and eagerly read by all parties. Many of them are filled with the most

stinging remarks on the general position and moral character of the

clergy.

But by far the most important element in the movement, and, in fact,

that which has determined its subsequent direction, has been the

following letter of John Ronge, priest in Silesia, dated Laurahuette, 1st

October 1844, and entitled, "Opinion of the Catholic Priest John Ronge,

on the Holy Coat of Treves:"

Laurahuette, October 1st.

Opinion of a Catholic Priest in regard to the Holy Tunic at Treves.

"Christians of the nineteenth century,--you have heard--you know it--men

of Germany--you know it--spiritual and temporal teachers of the German

people, that what would once upon a time have sounded in our ears as a

fable or a fiction--is neither a fiction nor a fable, but real truth

and verity. Bishop Arnoldi of Treves has exhibited for the adoration and

reverence of Christians, a garment called the Tunic of our Lord!

"According to the last account, five hundred thousand persons have

already made a pilgrimage to see this relic, and every day fresh

thousands flock to it, especially since the garment in question is found

capable of curing diseases and working miracles.

"The news has spread among the people of all lands, while certain

priests in France maintain that they alone possess the real tunic of

Christ, and that the one at Treves is an imposture. Truly the saying

here applies,--'He who can occupy his mind about such things without

losing his reason, has none to lose.' Five hundred thousand men--five

hundred thousand intelligent Germans have--already hastened to see or to

adore a piece of dress at Treves! The greater number of these thousands

are from the lower orders of the people, and, besides, in deepest

poverty,--oppressed, uneducated, stupid, superstitious, and in part

demoralized. They leave the cultivation of their fields, the labour of

their workshops, the care of their households, the education of their

children, to take part in a Heathen festival at Treves--a disgraceful

spectacle, which the Romish Church displays before their eyes. Yes, it

is a Heathen festival, for many thousands of the credulous multitude to

render to a piece of dress,--the work of human hands,--that regard and

adoration which are due to God alone. And what pernicious consequences

must follow from these pilgrimages! Thousands of the pilgrims deprive

themselves of the necessaries of life to raise the money for their

journey, and the offering which they make to the Holy Tunic--that is,

to the clergy. They purchase it by sacrifices of their comfort, or by

begging--only to starve on their return; to suffer want, or to fall sick

in consequence of the fatigues of the journey. If these external results

are sufficiently melancholy, the moral consequences are far more so.

Will not many of them, reduced to want by the expenses of their journey,

endeavour to relieve themselves by unlawful means?

"Many wives and virgins sacrifice their purity of heart, their

reputation, and their chastity, destroying thus the peace, the

happiness, and comfort of their families.

"In fine, this most unchristian exhibition but creates an inlet for

superstition, hypocrisy, and fanaticism, with all the vice that follows

in their train. Such is the blessing spread abroad by the exhibition

of the Holy Tunic, and it is a matter but of small moment whether it be

genuine or false.

"And the man who publicly displays this piece of dress--the work

of human hands--for reverent regard--who leads astray the religious

feelings of the credulous, ignorant, or suffering people--giving thereby

an impulse to vice and superstition--who wrings their substance from

the poor and starving multitude--who entails on Germany the ridicule of

other lands, and who draws more close together the heavy clouds which

float already dark and dismally above our heads--this man is a bishop, a

German bishop. It is Arnoldi, Bishop of Treves!

"Arnoldi, Bishop of Treves, I therefore turn to you, and demand, by

authority of my office and calling as a priest and teacher of the German

people--in the name of Christendom, in the name of the German nation,

and in the name of its instructors--that you put an end to the

unchristian spectacle of the exhibition of the Holy Tunic--and withdraw

this garment, that the offence which it has given may not be still

increased! For, do you not know--as bishop you ought to know--that

the Founder of the Christian religion left to his disciples and his

followers not his coat but his spirit?--his coat, Bishop Arnoldi of

Treves, belongs to his _executioners!_ Do you not know--as bishop you

ought to know--that Jesus taught--'God is a Spirit, and they who worship

him must worship him in spirit and in truth?' and He may be worshipped

everywhere, not only in the temple at Jerusalem, on the Mount Gerizim,

or at Treves, in presence of the holy tunic; do you not know--as bishop

you ought to know--that the Gospel expressly forbids the adoration of

every image and of every relic? that Christians in the Apostolic age,

and in the three first centuries, suffered neither images nor relics

in their churches (and _they_ might have had plenty of them)? that the

worship of images and relics is a Heathen custom, and that the Fathers

in the first three centuries abused the Heathens on account of it? We

read, for instance, (Div. inst. 11., c. 2,) 'Neither do these besotted

men understand that if the images possessed life and motion, they would

rather worship the man by whom they had been formed.' Lastly, do you

not know--as bishop you ought to know this also--that the vigorous and

healthy mind of the German people was first degraded to the worship of

relics by the Crusades in the 13th and 14th centuries? when the exalted

conception of the Godhead which Christianity inculcates, had been

obscured by all the lying marvels brought from eastern lands? Hark ye!

Bishop Arnoldi of Treves, you know all this, and better probably than I

can tell it to you. You also know the effects which superstition and

the idolatrous adoration of relics have worked among us, namely, the

religious and political bondage of Germany; and yet, you can display

your relics to the admiration of the multitude. And were it even

possible you should be ignorant of all that I have told you,--that the

salvation of souls was your sole aim in the exhibition of this Holy

Tunic,--you would, notwithstanding, have two sins upon your conscience.

In the first place, it is unpardonable, if the garment in question

actually possess saving power, that you have withhold its benefits from

suffering men until the present time. And, secondly, it is unpardonable

that you accept the offerings of these countless multitudes. And is it

not unpardonable that you, as bishop, should accept of money from our

poor and starving people, especially when you have seen, not many weeks

ago, that hundreds have been driven by necessity to mutiny, despair, and

death? Do not allow yourself to be deceived by the influx of thousands

upon thousands, but, believe me, that while hundreds of thousands of the

German people hasten with holy fervour (?) to Treves, _millions_,

like myself, are filled with horror and the deepest indignation by the

disgraceful spectacle. And this indignation prevails not in individual

ranks and parties, but among all classes--even in the Catholic

priesthood. Judgment will overtake you, therefore, sooner than you think.

Arnoldi! the historian is already seizing his pen, to submit your name

to the contempt of your contemporaries and of posterity, and stigmatizes

you as the Tetzel of the nineteenth century!

"And you, fellow-citizens of Germany, whether near or at a distance from

Treves, unite your efforts to prevent the continuance of such an insult

to the German name. You have various means of working, take courage and

employ them; endeavour each and all, with resolute determination, to

encounter and restrain the tyrannous despotism of the Romish Church.

For it is not in Treves alone that the modern traffic in indulgences

is carried on; you are aware that in the east and west, the north and

south, rosary, mass, indulgence, burial moneys, and the like, are still

increasing, and with them spiritual darkness. Forward, then! Catholics

and Protestants, together to the work! Our happiness, our honour, our

freedom are at stake. Do not the manes of your fathers, who stormed the

Capitol, frown to see you suffer patiently the Castle of St. Angelo to

lord it over Germany. Dishonour not the laurels of a Huss, a Huetten, and

a Luther. Give words to their ideas, and convert their will into deed.

"Finally, my colleagues, whose sole endeavours and desires are centred

in the welfare of your congregations, the honour, the freedom, and the

happiness of your German countrymen, keep no longer silence! You sin

against your reputation, your religion, and your fatherland, if you

longer hesitate to follow out your improved convictions. I have already,

elsewhere, briefly addressed you, and shall therefore now conclude.

Prove yourselves the true disciples of Him who gave up all for truth,

and light, and liberty. Show that you have inherited, not his garment,

but his spirit.

"Johannes Ronge, _Catholic Priest_."

It may be at once seen that this letter is the production of no ordinary

man; and, at a glance, it cannot but remind us of him "whose words were

half battles." Few living Germans have such mastery over their language

in all its native strength. It was just such a production,--short,

nervous, and earnest,--that was required to give utterance to the

slumbering thoughts and sympathies of thousands. Appearing in a distant

and comparatively unknown part of Germany, it soon found its way

wherever the German language was spoken, and, wherever it has found its

way, there it has called forth a deep and hearty response. It has now

been translated into various languages, and, despite all the preventive

measures of police and clergy, it may now be found by the thousand all

over Germany. It is not our present purpose to state in what points the

views of the author seem defective. Our immediate object is simply

to lay before the reader some facts illustrative of the anti-Catholic

movement which has taken place, and is now advancing steadily. But first

a word about the course pursued with regard to the author. From events

which had previously taken place in the Cathedral of Breslau, to

which diocese he was attached, the suspicions of the ecclesiastical

authorities were not long in fixing upon Ronge as the author of

the above letter, which appeared anonymously in the _Saechsische

Vaterlands-blaetter_. His manly love of truth disdained equivocation

or subterfuge, and, as the result of all, he was deposed and

excommunicated. A complete host of pamphlets were called suddenly into

existence by the daring letter of one who, calling himself a Catholic

priest, had still the hardihood to asperse the character and cause of

the one all-holy Church, by attacking one of its most imposing rites,

and treating with scorn and shame one of its consecrated bishops. Every

possible charge, affecting his character as a student, as a clergyman,

as a teacher, and as a man, was raked up against him. Those who had

not a tithe of his power of fierce and indignant invective, when truth

called for the vindication of its claims, made up for the defect by

personal scurrility and the most vulgar abuse. His former associates in

the priesthood openly denounced him, to exculpate themselves from

any supposed sympathy with the sentiments or with the man. A friend

generously undertook his defence--who declares, that at the Catholic

seminary he was distinguished by great diligence in his studies, as well

as by the purity of his moral life; so much so, that the superintendents

stated that they had seldom under their care a young man who sought to

become acquainted with the truths of the Catholic faith with such a deep

and holy earnestness. After a slight sketch of his doings in Breslau and

Grottkau, he states, "that every friend of his must feel persuaded that

the above letter proceeded from his inmost convictions. He is utterly

incapable of falsehood, in word or deed; and, as regards moral

character, that he is, perhaps, too stringent towards himself, but mild

and considerate to others. It was only the public wild proceedings of

the ultra-Montanists and Jesuits that filled him with holy indignation."

Ronge himself soon felt and saw the importance of the step which he had

taken. He was now beyond the pale of the Catholic Church, obliged to

relinquish all in defence of the truth, and exposed, from all quarters,

to attacks which his conscience told him to be groundless. The cause of

truth, for which he had already suffered, again demanded that his voice

should be upraised; and this he does in the following _Justification_,

which cannot but interest the reader as the autobiography of a

remarkable man, but especially from the fearful disclosures which it

makes of the present state and actual workings of Romanism. All the

facts adduced with regard to his anguish of mind--his deep sense of

the spiritual bondage under which he lay--his inward and outward

struggles--his determined opposition to what he believed to be wrong

and unjust--his plain but triumphant vindication of his conduct

throughout--all give a character of _truthfulness_ to the document,

which is its best guarantee, and makes it emphatically _speak for

itself_. It may enhance the interest of the following document to know

that it was soon prohibited by the censor of the press, notwithstanding

that the press of Leipsic is one of the freest in Germany:--

John Ronge; The Holy Coat of Treves; New German-Catholic Church · 第 11 / 43 题