Chapter I.

Transcriber's note:

Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_).

Small capital text has been replaced with all capitals.

* * * * *

MARRIED LOVE

Books by the same Author

SCIENTIFIC.

"The Cretaceous Flora, Part I." Illustrated. Published by the

Trustees of the British Museum. 12s. net.

"The Cretaceous Flora, Part II." Illustrated. Published by the

Trustees of the British Museum. £1 1s. net.

"Ancient Plants." Illustrated. Published by Blackie. 4s. 6d. net.

"The Study of Plant Life." Illustrated. Published by Blackie. 3s.

6d. net.

"Wise Parenthood." Published by Fifield. 2s. 6d. net.

TRAVEL.

"A Journal from Japan." Published by Blackie. 7s. 6d. net.

LITERARY.

"Man, Other Poems, and a Preface." Published by Heinemann. 3s. 6d.

net.

"Conquest," a Three-Act Play. Published by French. 1s. net.

"Gold in the Wood" and "The Race." Two Plays. Published by Fifield.

2s. net.

With Prof. J. Sakurai, "Plays of Old Japan, The Nö." Published

by Heinemann. 5s. net.

_The author's vivid and imaginative sympathy has really enabled her

in some degree to communicate the incommunicable._

ATHENÆUM.

MARRIED LOVE

A New Contribution to the

Solution of Sex Difficulties

BY

MARIE CARMICHAEL STOPES

_Doctor of Science, London; Doctor of Philosophy, Munich; Fellow

of University College, London; Fellow of the Royal Society of

Literature, and the Linnean Society, London_

_With a Preface by Dr. JESSIE MURRAY

and LETTERS from PROFESSOR E. H. STARLING, F.R.S.,

and FATHER STANISLAUS ST. JOHN, S.J._

_Sixth and enlarged Edition_

London: A. C. Fifield

13, Clifford's Inn, E.C.4

1919

_Dedicated to young husbands and all those who are betrothed in love_

_First published March 26, 1918_

_Second Edition printed May 17, 1918_

_Third Edition printed June 25, 1918_

_Fourth Edition printed August 2, 1918_

_Fifth Edition printed September 19, 1918_

_Sixth Edition printed February 3, 1919_

_Printed by the Pelican Press, London._

_Copyright; translation and all other rights reserved

by the Author_

_Copyright in U.S.A._

Contents

PAGE.

Preface by Dr. Jessie Murray vii

Letter from Professor Starling, F.R.S., &c. x

Author's Preface xi

Letter from Father St. John and Reply xiv

Chapter I. The Heart's Desire 1

Chapter II. The Broken Joy 7

Chapter III. Woman's "Contrariness" 14

Chapter IV. The Fundamental Pulse 26

Chapter V. Mutual Adjustment 38

Chapter VI. Sleep 55

Chapter VII. Modesty and Romance 66

Chapter VIII. Abstinence 72

Chapter IX. Children 77

Chapter X. Society 92

Chapter XI. The Glorious Unfolding 107

Additions to Sixth Edition 114

Appendix 123

Charts to face 32 and 33

Preface

BY

Miss JESSIE MURRAY, M.B., B.S.

In this little book Dr. Marie Stopes deals with subjects which are

generally regarded as too sacred for an entirely frank treatment.

Some earnest and delicate minds may feel apprehensive that such

frankness in details is "dangerous," because the effect on prurient

minds might be to give them food for their morbid fancies. It is

just such a fear which has been largely responsible for the silence

and mystery which have for so long been wrapped round the sacred

rites of mating.

The question now is, Has this reticence been carried too far? Has

it been carried so far that it now tends to defeat its purpose of

safeguarding public morals? There are many who unhesitatingly answer

such questions in the affirmative. Their intimate knowledge of human

lives compels them to recognise that at least as much harm is done

by silence as by speaking out. Everything depends on how the matter

is presented.

Those who are shocked at the publication of such a book as this on

the ground that it gives material for impure minds to sport with,

need only reflect that such material is already amply provided in

certain comic papers, in hosts of inferior novels, too often on the

stage and film, and presented thus in coarse and demoralising guise.

It can do nothing but good to such minds to meet the facts they are

already so familiar with in a totally new light.

On the other hand, there are all the earnest and noble young minds

who seek to know what responsibilities they are taking on themselves

when they marry, and how they may best meet these responsibilities.

How few of them have more than the vaguest ideas on the subject! How

few of them know how or where to obtain the help they desire!

They recoil from the coarse and impure sources of information which

are so accessible, and they hesitate to approach those they have

learned to regard as virtuous and modest, realising that from such

they will receive so little actual information, and that so veiled

as to be almost useless.

Dr. Stopes has attempted to meet the need of such seekers, and her

book will certainly be warmly welcomed by them. It is calculated

to prevent many of those mistakes which wreck the happiness of

countless lovers as soon as they are actually married. If it did no

more than this it would be valuable indeed!

But there is an even more important aspect to be considered--the

effect on the child. In all civilised lands there is a growing sense

of responsibility towards the young.

The problems of their physical and mental nurture attract more and

more attention day by day. Eugenists, educationists, physicians,

politicians, philanthropists, and even ordinary parents discuss and

ponder, ponder and discuss, matters both great and small which have

a bearing on the development of the child. By common consent the

first seven years of life are regarded as the most critical. It is

during these years that the foundations of the personality-to-be

are laid--"well and truly" or otherwise. It is during these years

that the deepest and most ineradicable impressions are made in the

plastic constitution of the child, arresting or developing this or

the other instinctive trend and fixing it, often for life.

And it is during these years above all that the parents play the

most important role in the inner history of the child's life, not so

much by anything they directly teach through verbal exhortations,

warnings, or commands, as by those subtler influences which are

conveyed in gesture, tone, and facial expression. The younger the

child, the more is it influenced through these more primitive modes

of expression, and quite as much when they are not directed towards

itself but are employed by the parents in their intimate relations

with one another in the presence of their apparently unobserving

child--the infant in its cot, the toddling baby by the hearth, the

little child to all appearance absorbed in its picture book or toy.

Is it not of the utmost importance that these earliest impressions

should be of the finest nature? And should we not therefore welcome

all that may help--as this book can--to make the living cradle of

the next generation as full of beauty and harmony as love and mutual

understanding can?

The age-long conflict between the "lower" and the "higher" impulses,

between the primitive animal nature and the specifically human

developments of an altruistic and ethical order, are fought afresh

in each soul and in every marriage.

We need to realise more clearly that the lower is never--ought

never to be--_eliminated_ but rather _subsumed by the higher_. No

true harmony can be hoped for so long as one factor or the other is

ignored or repressed.

Dr. Stopes makes some very important biological suggestions which

should not be lightly dismissed. Further observation is required

to establish or disprove her theory of the normal sexual cycle in

women, but my own observation certainly tends to confirm it.

J. M. MURRAY.

_Letter from_ Professor E. H. STARLING, M.D., B.S., F.R.S.,

_Professor of Physiology_, _University of London_.

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE,

GOWER STREET, LONDON, W.C.,

November 23, 1917.

DEAR DR. STOPES,--

The need of such guidance as you give is very evident. After all,

instinct in man is all insufficient to determine social behaviour,

and there is need of instruction in the highest of physiological

functions, that of reproduction, as there is in the lower functions

of eating and drinking--the only difference being that in the former

instruction can be deferred to a later age. And there is no doubt

that in this case it is better to acquire knowledge by instruction

than by a type of experience which is nearly always sordid and may

be fraught with danger to the health of the individual and of the

family.

At the present time it is of vital importance to the State that its

marriages should be fruitful--in children, happiness, and efficiency

(and all three are closely connected).

If your book helps in securing this object, your trouble will not

have been in vain.

Believe me,

Yours very truly,

ERNEST H. STARLING.

Author's Preface

More than ever to-day are happy homes needed. It is my hope that

this book may serve the State by adding to their numbers. Its object

is to increase the joys of marriage, and to show how much sorrow may

be avoided.

The only secure basis for a present-day State is the welding of

its units in marriage; but there is rottenness and danger at the

foundations of the State if many of the marriages are unhappy.

To-day, particularly in the middle classes in this country, marriage

is far less really happy than its surface appears. Too many who

marry expecting joy are bitterly disappointed; and the demand for

"freedom" grows; while those who cry aloud are generally unaware

that it is more likely to have been their own ignorance than the

"marriage-bond" which was the origin of their unhappiness.

It is never _easy_ to make marriage a lovely thing; and it is an

achievement beyond the powers of the selfish, or the mentally

cowardly. Knowledge is needed and, as things are at present,

knowledge is almost unobtainable by those who are most in want of it.

The problems of the sex-life are infinitely complex, and for their

solution urgently demand both sympathy and scientific research.

I have some things to say about sex, which, so far as I am aware,

have not yet been said, things which seem to be of profound

importance to men and women who hope to make their marriages

beautiful.

This little book is less a record of a research than an attempt to

present in easily understandable form the clarified and crystallised

results of long and complex investigations. Its simple statements

are based on a very large number of first-hand observations, on

confidences from men and women of all classes and types, and on

facts gleaned from wide reading.

My original contributions to the age-long problems of marriage

will principally be found in Chapters IV., V., and VIII. The other

chapters fill in what I hope is an undistorted picture of the

potential beauties and realities of marriage.

The whole is written simply, and for the ordinary untrained reader,

though it embodies some observations which will be new even to those

who have made scientific researches on the subjects of sex and human

physiology. These observations I intend to supplement and publish at

greater length and in more scientific language in another place.

I do not now touch upon the many human variations and abnormalities

which bulk so largely in most books on sex, nor do I deal with the

many problems raised by incurably unhappy marriages.

In the following pages I speak to those--and in spite of all our

neurotic literature and plays they are in the great majority--who

are nearly normal, and who are married or about to be married, and

hope, but do not know how, to make their marriages beautiful and

happy.

To the reticent, as to the conventional, it may seem a presumption

or a superfluity to speak of the details of the most complex of all

our functions. They ask: Is not instinct enough? The answer is No.

Instinct is _not_ enough. In every other human activity it has been

realised that training, the handing on of tradition are essential.

As Dr. Saleeby once wisely pointed out: A cat knows how to manage

her new-born kittens, how to bring them up and teach them; a human

mother does not know how to manage her baby unless she is trained,

either directly or by her own quick observation of other mothers. A

cat performs her simple duties by instinct; a human mother has to be

trained to fulfil her very complex ones.

The same is true in the subtle realm of sex. In this country, in

modern times, the old traditions, the profound primitive knowledge

of the needs of both sexes, have been lost, and nothing but

a muffled confusion of individual gossip disturbs a silence,

shamefaced or foul. Here and there, in a family of fine tradition,

a youth or maiden may learn some of the mysteries of marriage, but

the great majority of people in our country have no glimmering of

the supreme human art, the art of love; while in books on advanced

Physiology and Medicine the gaps, the omissions, and even the

misstatements of bare fact are amazing.

In my first marriage I paid such a terrible price for sex-ignorance

that I feel that knowledge gained at such a cost should be placed

at the service of humanity. In this little book average, healthy,

mating creatures will find the key to the happiness which should

be the portion of each. It has already guided some to happiness,

and I hope it may save some others years of heartache and blind

questioning in the dark.

MARIE CARMICHAEL STOPES.

AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO FOURTH EDITION.

I so much regret that many people have had to wait for the book, or

been unable to get it. The paper restrictions and difficulties of

printing and binding have been great. At first the publisher started

with a modest edition of 2,000, not knowing what sort of reception

the book would have. Now that we know that people not only need the

book but really _want_ it we hope to be able to keep it in print,

instead of perforce having it so often "reprinting," as it has been

in the first few months of its existence.

MARIE CARMICHAEL STOPES.

AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO FIFTH EDITION.

To mention some of those whose appreciation and encouragement have

so much helped the progress of this book would be invidious, and to

record them all would fill pages with mere names; but there is one

toward whom I have often desired to record in print my gratitude,

and that is Humphrey Verdon Roe. These thanks are rendered to him

not in his private capacity of adored and adoring husband, but in

his more public office of sympathetic friend. Though he did not

meet me early enough to contribute to the text of the book itself

his interest has nevertheless been invaluable in creating a helpful

atmosphere for the ever-increasing work the book brings.

MARIE CARMICHAEL STOPES.

AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO SIXTH EDITION.

The difficulty and cost of printing still renders it inadvisable

to incorporate throughout this edition the number of small notes I

should like to add, and the further points about which my various

correspondents have asked advice.

Among the subjects of inquiry, two are particularly prominent in

the many letters which readers send me. The most frequent questions

concern the practical extension so many desire to Chapter 9. This

I have already dealt with separately in the short companion volume

called "Wise Parenthood." The other subject deals with the reverse

state of affairs and is also an extension of Chapter 9. This, for

the present, I am placing at the end of the volume, Addition 4, page

119. Other points are dealt with on pages 114, _et seq._

Readers who have kindly contributed information, or have made

requests for more light in a new edition, will, I hope, be satisfied

now before too long a time has elapsed.

MARIE CARMICHAEL STOPES

_Letter from_ Father STANISLAUS ST. JOHN, F.C., S.J.

114, MOUNT STREET,

LONDON, W. I,

December 11, 1917.

DEAR DR. STOPES,

I have read "Married Love" with deep interest. As a piece of

thoughtful, scientific writing I find it admirable throughout,

and it seems to me that your theme could not have been treated in

more beautiful or more delicate language, or with a truer ring of

sympathy for those who, through ignorance or want of thought, make

shipwreck of their married happiness.

Your clear exposition of the rhythmic curve of sex-feeling and of

the misinterpretation on the part of so many husbands of what they

call their wives' contrariness, arising from their ignorance of its

existence, should bring happiness to many married couples whose

lives are drifting apart through want of knowledge. In the exercise

of my ministry I have repeatedly traced the beginnings of the rift

to this want of knowledge and consequently of sympathy.

So far we are in complete agreement, but our ways part when you

treat of birth control.

You write primarily as a scientist (though a very human scientist),

and so you are naturally mainly occupied with the facts and

conditions of what I may call our earth-life. I, on the other

hand, writing as a Catholic, regard our earth-life as essentially

and inseparably connected with an eternal existence which reaches

out beyond the grave. I look on this life as utterly meaningless

in itself, as a period which is simply and solely a means to an

end--Eternity--a period of which all the circumstances of pleasure

and pain can only be explained and rightly used in their relation to

this Eternity.

Let me take in illustration of my meaning the case you give of the

worn-out mother of twelve. The Catholic belief is that the loss

of health on her part for a few years of life and the diminished

vitality on the part of her later children would be a very small

price indeed to pay for an endless happiness on the part of all.

In our belief, then, the destruction of one spermatazoon is not

the question, but the deliberate prevention of an eternally

happy existence which, in the supposition, might arise from its

preservation. Holding, as we do, that the marriage-act is the

divinely ordained means by which man offers to God the opportunity

of creating an immortal being, we do not believe that he may make

use of this means and deliberately frustrate it of its end without

doing grave wrong.

You do me the honour of suggesting that I should write a foreword

to your book, but any foreword from me could obviously only derive

value from my position as a Catholic priest, and that position is in

opposition to this part of your work.

I cannot end without thanking you very sincerely for allowing me to

read your book. Apart from what, as a Catholic, I object to in it,

it contains so much most helpful matter that I feel sure it will

bring to many a happiness in married life now wanting through the

ignorance and the consequent want of sympathy which you so rightly

deplore.

Believe me, dear Dr. Stopes,

Yours very sincerely,

S. ST. JOHN, S.J., C.F.

I publish this letter with sincere thanks to Father St. John for his

permission to use it.--M. C. S.

Reply to Father St. John, S.J.

LEATHERHEAD, December 12, 1917.

DEAR FATHER ST. JOHN,--

Your letter wins my heart entirely by its appreciation and kindness.

It is a great help and encouragement to find that we are so far in

essential agreement, and that you are so well disposed toward even

part of my effort.

But--and I wish I could say it in burning words--it is not because

I am chiefly concerned with Time that I wrote Chapter IX., but just

because I am so acutely and so persistently conscious that I am

dealing with factors of Eternity. _To me to-day is essentially a

part of my Life Everlasting._

I cannot separate time and eternity, this world and the next, as

religious people often seem able to do; to me this body is a tool

in the service of (though not completely in the control of) my

immortal soul. Now it seems to me that religious people--and even

in your letter I fancy I detect the same tendency (forgive me if

I am wrong)--are too ready to separate this world and the next,

to act unreasonably or cruelly here and to trust to Eternity, or

the Hereafter, to put all right. I do not think that is the way

God wills us to work out His plans now that He is giving us the

knowledge to do better.

Could there be anything more unreasonable or cruel than to bring

into life half a dozen children _doomed from birth_ to ill-health,

poverty, and almost inevitable crime?

Christ forgave the thief upon the Cross, but He said, "Woe unto him

through whom offences come. It were better for him that a millstone

were hanged about his neck and he cast into the sea." Would Christ

approve of deliberately creating a thief by bringing forth a child

who was one inevitably through predictable weakness of physique

and mentality and an environment of poverty? ("Thief" stands for

criminals in general.)

But more, what about others, born dead, born imbecile, thwarted of

life by miscarriage, which tear and rend the overburdened mother so

that she is forced to neglect the children she has, and her neglect

turns them into thieves? The poor, uneducated mother commits this

crime through ignorance: it is _we who know_ and allow her to remain

in ignorance who are really responsible. Is not our withholding

God-given knowledge the greatest stumbling-block of offence to these

little ones, and shall we not deserve the millstone round our necks?

Were everyone to have all the children physiologically possible

(now that infant mortality is so much reduced by science) in a few

centuries there would not be standing room on the earth, and nowhere

for a blade of grass or an ear of corn to grow between the crowding

feet. Is then a Roman Catholic mother, the increases to whose large

family get punier and punier, to be privileged to go deliberately

with that host of puny children _at the expense of others_, not only

through that part of Eternity called Time, but through all Eternity?

But, dear Father St. John, it is not my place to preach or to argue

with you, especially after your generous kindness and appreciation.

And, alas! I fully realise that even were I granted the tongues of

men and of angels, and I converted you to my thought in this matter,

you as a Roman Catholic priest could not uphold a position in

opposition to your Church.

Oh, that the Churches would look to Christ's own words instead of to

the official Church interpretation of them!

I thank you very sincerely for your kindness to a stranger, and

remain, always yours respectfully,

MARIE CARMICHAEL STOPES.

Chapter I.

The Heart's Desire

She gave him comprehension of the meaning of love: a word in

many mouths, not often explained. With her, wound in his idea of

her, he perceived it to signify a new start in our existence, a

finer shoot of the tree stoutly planted in good gross earth; the

senses running their live sap, and the minds companioned, and

the spirits made one by the whole-natured conjunction. In sooth,

a happy prospect for the sons and daughters of Earth, divinely

indicating more than happiness: the speeding of us, compact

of what we are, between the ascetic rocks and the sensual

whirlpools, to the creation of certain nobler races, now very

dimly imagined.--George Meredith's "Diana of the Crossways,"

chap. 37.

Every heart desires a mate. For some reason beyond our

comprehension, nature has so created us that we are incomplete in

ourselves; neither man nor woman singly can know the joy of the

performance of all the human functions; neither man nor woman singly

can create another human being. This fact, which is expressed in our

outward divergencies of form, influences and colours the whole of

our lives; and there is nothing for which the inner-most spirit of

one and all so yearns as for a sense of union with another soul, and

the perfecting of oneself which such union brings.

In all young people, unless they have inherited depraved or diseased

faculties, the old desire of our race springs up afresh in its

pristine beauty.

With the dreams and bodily changes of adolescence, come to the youth

and maiden the strange and powerful impulses of the racial instinct.

The bodily differences of the two, now accentuated, become mystical,

alluring, enchanting in their promise. Their differences unite and

hold together the man and the woman so that their bodily union

is the solid nucleus of an immense fabric of interwoven strands

reaching to the uttermost ends of the earth; some lighter than the

filmiest cobweb, or than the softest wave of music, iridescent

with the colours, not only of the visible rainbow, but of all the

invisible glories of the wave-lengths of the soul.

However much he may conceal it under assumed cynicism, worldliness,

or self-seeking, the heart of every young man yearns with a great

longing for the fulfilment of the beautiful dream of a life-long

union with a mate. Each heart knows instinctively that it is only a

mate who can give full comprehension of all the potential greatness

in the soul, and have tender laughter for all the child-like wonder

that lingers so enchantingly even in the white-haired.

The search for a mate is a quest for an understanding heart clothed

in a body beautiful, but unlike our own.

In the modern world, those who set out on high endeavours or

who consciously separate themselves from the ordinary course of

social life, are comparatively few, and it is not to them that

I am speaking. The great majority of our citizens--both men and

women--after a time of waiting, or of exploring, or of oscillating

from one attraction to another, "settle down" and marry.

Very few are actually so cynical as to marry without the hope of

happiness; while most young people, however their words may deny it

and however they may conceal their tender hopes by an assumption of

cynicism, reveal that they are conscious of entering on a new and

glorious state by their radiant looks and the joyous buoyancy of

their actions. In the kisses and the hand touch of the betrothed

are a zest and exhilaration which stir the blood like wine. The

two read poetry, listen entranced to music which echoes the songs

of their pulses, and see reflected in each other's eyes the beauty

of the world. In the midst of this celestial intoxication they

naturally assume that, as they are on the threshold of their lives,

so too they are in but the ante-chamber of their experience of

spiritual unity.

The more sensitive, the more romantic, and the more idealistic is

the young person of either sex, the more his or her soul craves for

some kindred soul with whom the whole being can unite. But all have

some measure of this desire, even the most prosaic, and we know from

innumerable stories of real life that the sternest man of affairs,

he who may have worldly success of every sort, may yet, through the

lack of a real mate, live with a sense almost as though the limbs of

his soul had been amputated. Edward Carpenter has beautifully voiced

this longing:--

That there should exist one other person in the world towards

whom all openness of interchange should establish itself, from

whom there should be no concealment; whose body should be as

dear to one, in every part, as one's own; with whom there should

be no sense of Mine or Thine, in property or possession; into

whose mind one's thoughts should naturally flow, as it were to

know themselves and to receive a new illumination; and between

whom and oneself there should be a spontaneous rebound of

sympathy in all the joys and sorrows and experiences of life;

such is perhaps one of the dearest wishes of the soul.--"Love's

Coming of Age."

It may chance that someone into whose hands this book falls may

protest that he or she has never felt the fundamental yearning to

form a part of that trinity which alone is the perfect expression

of humanity. If that is so, it is possible that all unconsciously

he may be suffering from a real malady--sex anæsthesia. This is the

name given to an inherent coldness, which, while it lacks the usual

human impulse of tenderness, is generally quite unconscious of its

lack. It may even be that the reader's departure from the ordinary

ranks of mankind is still more fundamental, in which case, instead

of sitting in judgment on the majority, he will do well to read

some such book as "The Sexual Question" (English translation 1908)

by the famous Professor August Forel, in order that his own nature

may be made known to him. He may then discover to which type of our

widely various humanity he belongs. He need not read my book, for

it is written about, and it is written for, ordinary men and women

who, feeling themselves incomplete, yearn for a union that will have

power not only to make a fuller and richer thing of their own lives,

but which will place them in a position to use their sacred trust as

creators of lives to come.

It has happened many times in human history that individuals have

not only been able to conquer this natural craving for a mate,

but have set up celibacy as a higher ideal. In its most beautiful

expression and sublimest manifestations, the celibate ideal has

proclaimed a world-wide love, in place of the narrower human love of

home and children. Many saints and sages, reformers and dogmatists

have modelled their lives on this ideal. But such individuals cannot

be taken as the standard of the _race_, for they are out of its main

current: they are branches which may flower, but never fruit in a

bodily form.

In this world our spirits not only permeate matter but find their

only expression through its medium. So long as we are human we must

have bodies, and bodies obey chemical and physiological, as well as

spiritual laws.

If our race as a whole set out to pursue an ideal which must

ultimately eliminate bodies altogether, it is clear that very soon

we should find the conditions of our environment so altered that we

could no longer speak of the human race.

In the meantime, we _are_ human. We each and all live our lives

according to laws, some of which we have begun to understand, many

of which are completely hidden from us. The most complete human

being is he or she who consciously or unconsciously obeys the

profound physical laws of our being in such a way that the spirit

receives as much help and as little hindrance from the body as

possible. A mind and spirit finds its fullest expression thwarted by

the misuse, neglect or gross abuse of the body in which it dwells.

By the ignorant or self-indulgent breaking of fundamental laws

endless harmonies are dislocated. The modern, small-minded ascetic

endeavours to grow spiritually by destroying his physical instincts

instead of by using them. But I would proclaim that we are set in

the world so to mould matter that it may express our spirits; that

it is presumption to profess to fight the immemorial laws of our

physical being, and that he who does so loses unconsciously the

finest flux in which wondrous new creations take their rise.

To use a homely simile--one might compare two human beings to two

bodies charged with electricity of different potentials. Isolated

from each other the electric forces within them are invisible, but

if they come into the right juxtaposition the force is transmuted,

and a spark, a glow of burning light arises between them. Such is

love.

From the body of the loved one's simple, sweetly coloured flesh,

which our immemorial creature instincts urge us to desire, there

springs not only the wonder of a new bodily life, but also the

enlargement of the horizon of human sympathy and the glow of

spiritual understanding which a solitary soul could never have

attained alone.

Many reading this may feel conscious that they have had physical

union without such spiritual results, perhaps even without an

accession of ordinary happiness. If that is so, it can only be

because, consciously or unconsciously, they have broken some of

the profound laws which govern the love of man and woman. Only by

learning to hold a bow correctly can one draw music from a violin:

only by obedience to the laws of the lower plane can one step up to

the plane above.

Married Love: A New Contribution to the Solution of Sex Difficulties · 第 1 / 11 章