“Mr. Stewart spent a delightful year in Dayton where he learned to

play golf, and read the works of Max Beerbohm, Sainte-Beuve, Casanova,

Swift, James Branch Cabell, James Huneker, and William Congreve. He

also renewed his piano lessons, getting as far as the Bach three-part

inventions and ‘Easy Classics.’ On December 30, 1920, he read the

first volume of the Alexander Hamilton business course, after which he

decided that he wanted to go in for literature. In January, 1921, Mr.

Stewart came to New York City to find a job (literary if possible), but

there were so many symphony concerts that month that he didn’t get a

chance to look around until the middle of February.

“The idea for the _Parody Outline of History_ came to Mr. Stewart in

March, while hearing Mr. Mengelberg conduct the National Orchestra in

the Pathetique Symphony.

“Mr. Stewart is unmarried and very near-sighted. He is fond of

Beethoven, Scotch, and Max Beerbohm.”

ii

So much for Mr. Stewart’s life up to the publication of _The Parody

Outline of History_. In the following year (1922)--but let Mr. Stewart

again speak:

“After the appearance of the _Parody Outline_ Mr. Stewart, having heard

a great deal about Europe in the course of his naval war service in

Chicago, decided to go abroad. Many of his friends recommended Paris as

a pleasant city in which to work, so Mr. Stewart went to Paris, which

he found indeed very pleasant but not for work. So after a brief period

of recuperation he journeyed to Vienna where he grew a splendid red

beard and wrote _Perfect Behavior_.

“Finding, however, that the beard was exhausting too much of his

creative energy, Mr. Stewart shaved and went to Budapest, where he

enjoyed himself immensely at the rate of 700 Hungarian crowns to the

dollar.

“But in the middle of October he began to feel strangely uneasy, and

as his condition grew steadily worse he consulted an authority and

learned, to his surprise and delight, that he was going to have another

book.

“Bidding a hasty farewell to the gay life of Budapest, which now seemed

all too empty and frivolous, Mr. Stewart journeyed with his precious

secret to Capri, there, under the ever-blue Italian skies, to await

the happy event. He prayed with all his heart that it might be a novel,

for he had never had a novel, although he had wanted one all his life.

But early in February, 1923, Mr. Stewart discovered that the ‘little

stranger’ was to be another satire, and although it was a bit of a blow

at first, after a few days he got over his disappointment at not having

a novel; and when, in June, Mr. Stewart returned to America he took

with him, proudly, his little third book, which he had christened _Aunt

Polly’s Story of Mankind_.”

iii

Alexander Woollcott speaking in “Shouts and Murmurs” in the New York

Herald of March 18, 1923:

“Stewart is a preposterously tall, blonde man, with an enviably large

amount of his twenties still to squander. His profile is faintly

reminiscent of that most delightful and fantastic of all creatures,

Winsor McKay’s Gertie. He knows more about the music than he does about

the books of the world, and has, we suspect, gone in for reading so

recently that he probably thinks all novels are like Joyce’s _Ulysses_.

We ran across him here and there in France last summer, starting out on

one pilgrimage together from the Café Valterre, in the Place Stanislas

at Nancy, that celebrated restaurant which set forth marvellous dishes

even when the bombs were dropping on Nancy every evening and there was

not another good meal to be found anywhere else in Lorraine. Up the

street somewhere was M. Coué, healing away for dear life, and on the

outskirts of the town an imitation Oberammergau was in full swing. But

the two of us were minded rather to move on to the battlefields, and

for the purpose engaged a morsel of a French car, driven by a youngster

who spoke a horrible dialect he had picked up three years before from

the Americans stationed at Neufchateau. The memories of that rambling

excursion into a cheerless countryside, still littered with the rusted

snarls of barbed wire and still gashed with the trenches no one has

had time or strength to obliterate, are brought flooding back by the

inscription in the copy of _Perfect Behavior_ lying open here on the

desk. It is inscribed: ‘In memory of terrible days and ghastly nights

on the battlefields of France,’ and winds up with this disconcerting

proclamation: ‘“It shall never happen again.”--Stewart.’

“Marc Connelly was agitated the other day by the receipt of a cablegram

from Stewart in Capri which read thus:

“‘The Queen of Sweden is here. What shall I do?--Stewart.’

“Connelly’s cabled reply must be admired equally for its sagacity and

its thrift. It was: ‘Compromise.’”

Books by Donald Ogden Stewart

1921 _A Parody Outline of History_

1922 _Perfect Behavior_

1923 _Aunt Polly’s Story of Mankind_

Sources on Donald Ogden Stewart

_The Making of a Humorist_, by DONALD OGDEN STEWART, suppressed by the

author, 1921.

_My Naval Career_, by DONALD OGDEN STEWART (Privately unpublished,

1921).

_14. Miss Zona Gale_

i

No one any longer doubts that Zona Gale belongs in the very small

company of American women novelists whose work is of the first artistic

importance. Her history is interesting. Of old New England parentage,

she was born in Portage, Wisconsin, where she now lives. She wrote, at

thirteen, a novel “which almost simultaneously came back to me from

a publisher.” At sixteen, just after she had entered the University

of Wisconsin, she submitted a 3,000-word short story to the Milwaukee

Evening Wisconsin, which paid her $3. When she finished college she

went to work for that newspaper. “I secured a position by attrition. I

presented myself every morning at the desk of the city editor. At the

end of two weeks the city editor let me write about a flower show. I

have never put such emotion into anything else I have written.” She

was another month getting on the staff. Later, by offering a list of

suggestions based on the day’s news, she succeeded after many weeks in

getting on the staff of the New York World.

An anonymous writer in The Bookman has pictured Miss Gale in New York:

“When she was a reporter on the World, and as beautiful as any girl

could be, she was put on difficult assignments that might well have

terrified one as fragile and flower-like and feminine as she; but she

never winced.... She covered murders and robberies--anything given

her to do she did, at any hour of the day or night. But all the while

she was writing exquisite poetry; and every day of her life she sent

a letter to her mother, who was back in Wisconsin. If she was waiting

for an interview with some financier of the hour, she did not dawdle

her time away in the corridor of his hotel. Instead, she pulled out a

pad and pencil and wrote as many pages as she could on a short story;

or she dashed off a lyric; or she made copious notes for future work.

I think she was about the most ambitious girl in New York at that

time--too ambitious, some said; her praises were being sung--too much

sung was a common rumour; her picture--how lovely she was, and is!--was

published repeatedly--too repeatedly, dear enemies whispered; and

everyone was waiting to see just how long it would take her to make

good.”

ii

It took some time. Not until the year in which she was 29 did she

land anywhere “to speak of,” though for ten years previous to that

acceptance, by Success Magazine, she had constantly submitted stories.

That was in 1903. Then, in 1911, the Delineator held a short story

contest in which over 15,000 stories were received. Miss Gale took

first prize with a tale called “The American Dawn.” It was $2,000 and

in addition her other two entries (each person was allowed to submit

three stories) were deemed good enough to be purchased. But meanwhile

she had written stories about Pelleas and Ettare, two old lovers,

and stories about Friendship Village--some forty of the first and,

ultimately, about sixty of the second--and the process of collecting

her Friendship Village fiction into books had begun. Said Miss Gale, in

1919: “The first editor to whom these Friendship Village stories were

submitted declined them with the word that his acquaintance with small

towns was wide but that he had never seen any such people as these....

I am still not sure that he was not right.”

She was the author of ten published books before she produced anything

constituting a lien upon general attention. But then, with an effect

of extreme suddenness to the world outside of Portage, there came from

her pen the 402-page novel, _Birth_. Its length is a point of interest

in view of the brevity of _Miss Lulu Bett_ and _Faint Perfume_, both

of which are so decidedly under the average novel in length. And yet

_Birth_ exhibits the same conciseness of phrase, the same avoidance of

unnecessary words so noticeable in the two later books. It is the story

of a poor little man, Marshall Pitt, who comes to an insignificant

Western town as a pickle salesman and remains there as a paperhanger,

a husband and a father. The book’s comments on life have been aptly

described as “piercing”--it is a fine needlework of satire--but

there are lovely lyrical moments and the tragic action is touched

with majesty. Altogether a great novel. Miss Gale considers it the

finest thing she has done and for once her judgment of her own work,

generally as untrustworthy as most authors’ or slightly more so, is

right.

Then came _Miss Lulu Bett_, read with the enthusiasm of discovery by

the publisher, who telegraphed his congratulations--a thing publishers

infrequently do! Except in England, where its merit was quickly

noted, _Birth_ had not sold at all well. Six magazine editors had

rejected _Miss Lulu Bett_ as a serial. Happily, all signs failed. The

crisply-told little novel of the household drudge and her fortunes went

into one edition after another; a play from the novel was sought and

Miss Gale fashioned it herself; the annual Pulitzer prize was awarded

to the play. Whether the concision of style practised so effectively in

_Birth_ was not carried a bit too far in _Miss Lulu Bett_ must always

remain a matter of opinion. The most interesting point, I think, is the

change of ending which the requirements of the theatre forced upon Miss

Gale. As she observed, an audience in a playhouse could not reasonably

be expected to swallow the spectacle of a woman marrying two men in the

space of three hours, even though the indicated lapse of time was much

longer than that; she therefore, to make the play, caused Miss Bett’s

first marriage to turn out to be valid after all. In this matter Miss

Gale was not guilty of “sweetening” her story, as has been charged. She

simply was up against a limitation as definite as that which restricts

the number of scenes possible in a play.

iii

And this year she has given us _Faint Perfume_, a study of a finely

sensitive feminine personality stifling in the atmosphere of a quite

usual sort of American family. Leda Perrin, forced to make her home

with the Crumbs, is brought into a fleeting contact with Barnaby

Powers, a writer with a temperament of the same response. They

meet, together face the defeat of their desire, and go separately

apart. At the close there is the briefest possible second meeting

and a hope is held out for their eventual happiness together. This

theme, of the utmost delicacy, is the occasion for a considerable

display of virtuosity by Miss Gale. By means of deft and distinct

individualisation of her characters--each Crumb, for instance, standing

out as a complete fiery particle--she orchestrates the melodic

fragment of Leda and Barnaby in a sort of free treatment (but with

careful working out), as a composer might do in setting a quartette

for strings. May this musical simile be helpful! The clipped style of

_Miss Lulu Bett_ is here carried a step further, until Miss Gale almost

seems to out-Sinclair Miss May Sinclair. The style has been called

precious, which is the technical word for what the ordinary person

calls “affected”; and, on the other hand, one able critic has declared

that it is not the style that is precious but Miss Gale’s material.

One thing is certain, the treatment is as far removed as possible from

the literalness of such a novel as _Main Street_, and this is natural

to expect when we remember that Miss Gale is, after all and perhaps

fundamentally, a poet. Her poems published in book form are to a great

extent inferior to her best poems, which, so far as I know, still

repose in some old files of the Smart Set magazine.

The point, however, is not the merit or demerit of _Faint Perfume_,

nor the relative values of Miss Gale’s three books here discussed. The

point is Zona Gale, her undeniable artistry, her literary maturity and

her manifest power ... and the importance of her work to come.

Books by Zona Gale

1906 _Romance Island_

1907 _The Loves of Pelleas and Ettarre_

1908 _Friendship Village_

1909 _Friendship Village Love Stories_

1911 _Mothers to Men_

1912 _Christmas_

1913 _When I Was a Little Girl_

1914 _Neighborhood Stories_

1915 _Heart’s Kindred_

1917 _A Daughter of Tomorrow_

1918 _Birth_

1919 _Peace in Friendship Village_

1920 _Miss Lulu Bett_

1920 _Neighbors_ (play)

1921 _Miss Lulu Bett_ (play)

1923 _Faint Perfume_

Sources on Zona Gale

_The Women Who Make Our Novels_ (second or third edition, 1919 or

1922). MOFFAT YARD & COMPANY.

The Literary Spotlight, XVIII: Zona Gale, in THE BOOKMAN for April,

1923. This article now forms a chapter in the book, _The Literary

Spotlight_, with an introduction by John Farrar.

_Zona Gale, An Artist in Fiction_, by WILSON FOLLETT. Booklet

published by D. Appleton & Company.

_15. For the Literary Investor_

i

As in the world of finance there are varieties of investment, so in

reading. A delicate parallel would be between individual authors and,

let us say, the mortgage field; whereas the reader who chooses books

included in undertakings like the Lambskin Library, the Murray Hill

Library or the Modern Student’s Library is like the man adventuring

among well-seasoned bonds. The individual author is the bolder

risk, less easily to be abandoned, lacking (usually) the element

of diversification; the certainty of interest from those carefully

selected Library volumes is somewhat greater and the investment in them

is more readily marketable in the discovery that your commitment is

shared with the other fellow, who also knows and has read them. Then

there is among books that type of investment for which men constantly

seek when trying to place their money--the unlisted and almost

unheard-of, lonely, isolated enterprise which one may, and probably

will, have all to himself....

What follows is a series of what, in the money world, would be called

“offerings.” These literary offerings are not necessarily in the least

related to each other, although here and there you may find features

in common. Each stands on the foundation of its own “attractiveness”

to you as an individual; but there is none which has not given a

good return to some group of readers, large or less large. Some are

well-seasoned; others, although new, show their intrinsic worth for

such time and attention as you may commit to them.

ii

J. C. Snaith, novelist. John Collis Snaith, born in 1876, in

Nottinghamshire of Yorkshire stock. Athletic in his youth, before

his health became impaired, playing cricket, football and hockey on

county teams. Always in the middle of a novel, either at Skegness or

in London, where he may with difficulty be tracked down at the Garrick

Club, hidden among W. J. Locke, W. B. Maxwell, A. E. W. Mason, Hugh

Walpole, Arnold Bennett, E. Temple Thurston, etc. His novels exhibit

constant variety. Richard Mansfield was always hoping for a play from

Snaith’s _Broke of Covenden_ so that he might act as Broke. _The

Sailor_, supposed to have been suggested by John Masefield’s career,

was a great popular success (1916) and is read and remembered widely

today. _The Coming_, an exquisite and powerful story in which the

reappearance of Jesus Christ in present-day England is suggested,

made an extraordinary impression. On the whole it is perhaps Snaith’s

own favourite. _The Undefeated_, a story of England in wartime, had

a large sale and gives promise of more permanence than any similar

book, including H. G. Wells’s _Mr. Britling_. A recent novel, _The

Van Roon_, is a lighter story written around the theft of a famous

painting. Snaith’s _Araminta_, which is being freshly brought out this

year, is a whimsical romance of a country girl who comes to London

and is sued for by two noblemen. Snaith says: “Each novel I write is

in the nature of an experiment. To me a good novel is a mental tonic,

exhilarating, educative, humanising.” He is both versatile and in the

quality of his work of unusual excellence.

W. B. Maxwell, novelist. English. A writer who has reached undeniable

greatness at times and who, when possessing the finest material, need

ask no odds of any living novelist. His most recent story, _The Day’s

Journey_, is a beautifully-conceived and beautifully-written story of

the friendship between two men enduring throughout their lives. The

differences in character, the obstacles arising in the course of that

friendship, the antagonisms and fallings-apart and the renewals of

these two old comrades are put on paper with a fidelity of observation,

a tenderness and an avoidance of sentimentality that would be difficult

to overpraise. Maxwell’s novels are of great variety; attention is

particularly called to _In Cotton Wool_, the story of a weakling. _Mrs.

Thompson_, _The Devil’s Garden_ and _Spinster of This Parish_ are also

highwater marks in his writing.

Hugh Walpole. Perhaps no living novelist has shown so uniform a quality

or so progressive an excellence. He resembles a stock which, starting

at a modest price and unfailingly paying dividends, has gone steadily

upward to par and is now quoted at a premium. His great success, _The

Cathedral_, is now followed by _Jeremy and Hamlet_, which, although

not a “sequel,” is a companion volume to _Jeremy_ (most popular of

all Walpole’s stories before the appearance of _The Cathedral_). As

_Jeremy_ dealt with the history of a little boy--most singularly

resembling the Hugh of Mr. Walpole’s own boyhood--so _Jeremy and

Hamlet_ presents the adventures of that boy accompanied by the only

proper companion for a small boy, a dog.

Rudyard Kipling. For a discussion of Kipling’s new work, _The Irish

Guards in the Great War_, see Chapter 8. The best exposition of

Kipling, the poet, will be found in Andre Chevrillon’s _Three Studies

in English Literature: Kipling, Galsworthy, Shakespeare_ (translated

by Florence Simmonds). Katharine Fullerton Gerould, in her _Modes and

Morals_, in the essay on “The Remarkable Rightness of Rudyard Kipling,”

offers a brilliant justification for Kipling as a prophetic and moral

influence in English affairs. The literary investor should not let

these aspects take his attention from the Kipling of _Plain Tales from

the Hills_, of _Kim_ and of such short stories as “The Brushwood Boy”

and “They.” A collection of rich, remarkably diversified, “gilt-edged”

securities possessing the widest possible market and an almost

universal currency.

Selma Lagerlöf, Swedish novelist, the only woman so far to receive the

Nobel Prize for Literature. The quality of her work is best conveyed

by the words of various critics. Edwin Björkman: “She has revived not

only the courage but the ability to feel and dream and aspire that

belonged to the scorned romanticists of the early nineteenth century.

But this ... she has achieved for us without surrender of that intimate

connection between poetry and real life which was established by the

naturalists in the latter half of the same century.” J. B. Kerfoot, in

Life: “The wise cannot find bottom nor the child get beyond its depth.”

Attempted comparisons with George Eliot fail because Selma Lagerlöf has

the fine Swedish folklore to enrich the roots of her work. “She is as

national,” says Walter Prichard Eaton, “as a song by Grieg or a play of

Tchekov. And like all deeply national art, it is therefore universal.”

Hugo Alfven, the Swedish composer: “Reading Selma Lagerlöf is like

sitting in the dusk of a Spanish cathedral.... Afterward, one does not

know whether what he has seen was dream or reality, but certainly he

has been on holy ground.” The best approach is possibly through _The

Story of Gösta Berling_. Her other great novels are _Jerusalem_, woven

from the actual experience of Swedish colonists in the Holy Land,

and _The Emperor of Portugallia_. Her _Nils_ stories for children

are mentioned in Chapter 9. Complete works are best procured in the

Northland Edition.

iii

A convenient size and a beautiful binding are more than desiderata.

Who, wishing Bram Stoker’s grim masterpiece, _Dracula_, would not now

prefer a new copy in the handy leather of the Lambskin Library? If

one is out to acquire a copy of W. Somerset Maugham’s _The Moon and

Sixpence_, will he not choose it in its plum-coloured leather and

gilt top of the Murray Hill Library? If I go forth to buy _Pride and

Prejudice_, I am as certain as anything to ask for it from the volumes

of the Modern Student’s Library, because this will give me William Dean

Howells’s introduction to the novel.

There is a further advantage of these collections in that they give

ready and inexpensive access to exceptional books that are otherwise

out of print. I might have excessive trouble, for example, to get

hold of _Dracula_ elsewhere. Yet the commonest advantage of such

sets is probably as a guide in reading. A publisher does not put a

book into his Lambskin Library, or his Murray Hill Library, or his

Modern Student’s Library unless the book is one of proved worth

and established permanence and continuing popularity. The Library,

therefore, offers a convenient and trustworthy solution to those who,

among books not freshly published, are unable to see the trees for the

forest. A word about these collections is in order.

The Lambskin Library at present comprises nearly fifty volumes,

chiefly fiction, although Lawrence F. Abbott’s _Impressions of

Theodore Roosevelt_, Helen Keller’s _The Story of My Life_, Booker

T. Washington’s _Up From Slavery_ and Franklin’s _Autobiography_ lay

a massive foundation for biographies. Conrad, Frank Norris, Selma

Lagerlöf, O. Henry, Dumas, Scott, Tarkington, Edna Ferber, Ellen

Glasgow, Zola and Rider Haggard are some of the authors represented.

Many of the books have interesting prefatory notes and among the

contributors of these are William Lyon Phelps, Christopher Morley,

William Allen White, John Macy and William Dean Howells.

The Modern Student’s Library is ultimately to include as many as

possible of the books one would wish to read in a comprehensive survey

of English and American literature. Both the general reader and the

student have been held in mind; the books represent a sane departure

from the heavily annotated texts of a few years ago. The books have

been edited, and introductions to them have been provided by such

authorities as William Dean Howells, Stuart P. Sherman, William Lyon

Phelps and Carl Van Doren. Bacon’s _Essays_, Boswell’s _Life of

Johnson_, Browning, Carlyle’s _Sartor Resartus_, Emerson’s _Essays_,

Hardy’s _The Return of the Native_, Hawthorne’s _The Scarlet Letter_,

Meredith, Ruskin, Scott, Stevenson, Thackeray, Thoreau and Whitman are

among those already included.

The Murray Hill Library, commencing with modern fiction, will probably

enlarge its scope to include some of the best modern non-fiction. Its

very handsome binding now covers twelve books, picked works by Arnold

Bennett, Somerset Maugham, Mary Roberts Rinehart, Irvin S. Cobb,

Walpole, G. A. Birmingham, John Buchan, Stephen McKenna, Swinnerton and

Richard Dehan.

American nights entertainment · 第 13 / 25 段