4 i John iv. 20.--M.

“There is not a passage in Scripture,” said Oisille, “too good for you

to turn to your own purposes. But beware of doing like the spider, which

transforms sound meat into poison. Be advised that it is a perilous

matter to quote Scripture out of place and without cause.”

“Do you call speaking the truth out of place and without cause?” said

Saffredent. “You hold, then, that when, in speaking to you unbelieving

women, we call God to our assistance, we take His name in vain; but if

there be any sin in this, you alone must bear the blame, for it is your

unbelief that compels us to seek out all the oaths that we can think of.

And in spite of it all, we cannot kindle the flame of charity in your

icy hearts.”

“That,” said Longarine, “proves that you all speak falsely. If truth

were in your words, it is strong enough to make you be believed. Yet

there is danger lest the daughters of Eve should hearken too readily to

the serpent.”

“I see clearly,” said Saffredent, “that women are not to be conquered

by men. So I shall be silent, and see to whom Ennasuite will give her

vote.”

“I give it,” she said, “to Dagoucin, for I think he would not willingly

speak against the ladies.”

“Would to God,” said Dagoucin, “that they were as well disposed towards

me as I am towards them. To show you that I have striven to honour the

virtuous among them by recalling their good deeds, I will now tell you

the story of such a one. I will not deny, ladies, that the patience of

the gentleman at Pampeluna, and of the President at Grenoble was great,

but then it was equalled in magnitude by their vengeance. Moreover,

when we seek to praise a virtuous man, we ought not so to exalt a single

virtue as to make of it a cloak for the concealment of grievous vice;

for none are praiseworthy save such as do virtuous things from the love

of virtue alone, and this I hope to prove by telling you of the patient

virtue of a lady whose goodness had no other object save the honour of

God and the salvation of her husband.”

[Illustration: 072.jpg Tailpiece]

[Illustration: 073a.jpg The Lady of Loué bringing her Husband the Basin of Water]

[The Lady of Loué bringing her Husband the Basin of Water]

[Illustration: 073.jpg Page Image]

_TALE XXXVII_.

_The Lady of Loué so influenced her husband by her great

patience and longsuffering, that she drew him from his evil

ways, and they lived afterwards in greater love than

before_.

There was a lady of the house of Loué (1) who was so prudent and

virtuous, that she was loved and esteemed by all her neighbours. Her

husband trusted her, as well he might, with all his affairs, and she

managed them with such wisdom that his house came, by her means, to be

one of the wealthiest and best appointed in either the land of Anjou or

Touraine.

1 Loué is in Anjou, in the department of the Sarthe, being

the chief locality of a canton of the arrondissement of Le

Mans. The Lady of Loué referred to may be either Philippa de

Beaumont-Bressuire, wife of Peter de Laval, knight, Lord of

Loué, Benars, &c.; or her daughter-in-law, Frances de

Maillé, who in or about 1500 espoused Giles de Laval, Lord

of Loué. Philippa is known to have died in 1525, after

bearing her husband five children. She had been wedded fifty

years. However, the subject of this story is the same as

that of the Lady of Langallier, or Languillier (also in

Anjou), which will be found in chapter xvii. of _Le Livre du

Chevalier de la Tour-Landry_, an English translation of

which, made in the reign of Henry VI., was edited in 1868 by

Mr. Thomas Wright for the Early English Text Society.--See

also Le Roux de Lincy’s _Femmes célèbres de l’ancienne

France,_ vol i. p. 356. Particulars concerning the Laval-

Loué family will be found in Duchesne’s Histoire de la

Maison de Montmorency.--L. and M.

In this fashion she lived a great while with her husband, to whom

she bore several handsome children; but then, as happiness is always

followed by its opposite, hers began to be lessened. Her husband,

finding virtuous ease to be unendurable, laid it aside to seek for toil,

and made it his wont to rise from beside his wife as soon as she was

asleep, and not to return until it was nearly morning. The lady of Loué

took this conduct ill, and falling into a deep unrest, of which she was

fain to give no sign, neglected her household matters, her person and

her family, like one that deemed herself to have lost the fruit of her

toils, to wit, her husband’s exceeding love, for the preserving of which

there was no pain that she would not willingly have endured. But having

lost it, as she could see, she became careless of everything else in the

house, and the lack of her care soon brought mischief to pass.

Her husband, on the one part, spent with much extravagance, while, on

the other, she had ceased to control the management, so that ere long

affairs fell into such great disorder, that the timber began to be

felled, and the lands to be mortgaged.

One of her kinsfolk that had knowledge of her distemper, rebuked her for

her error, saying that if love for her husband did not lead her to care

for the advantage of his house, she should at least have regard to her

poor children. Hereat her pity for them caused her to recover herself,

and she tried all means to win back her husband’s love.

In this wise she kept good watch one night, and, when he rose from

beside her, she also rose in her nightgown, let make her bed, and said

her prayers until her husband returned. And when he came in, she went to

him and kissed him, and brought him a basin full of water that he might

wash his hands. He was surprised at this unwonted behaviour, and told

her that there was no need for her to rise, since he was only coming

from the latrines; whereat she replied that, although it was no great

matter, it was nevertheless a seemly thing to wash one’s hands on coming

from so dirty and foul a place, intending by these words to make him

perceive and abhor the wickedness of his life. But for all that he did

not mend his ways, and for a full year the lady continued to act in this

way to no purpose.

Accordingly, seeing that this behaviour served her naught, one day,

while she was waiting for her husband, who tarried longer than ordinary,

she had a mind to go in search of him, and, passing from room to room,

found him at last in a closet at the back of the house, lying asleep by

the side of the ugliest, vilest, and filthiest serving-woman they had.

Thereupon, thinking she would teach him to leave so excellent a wife for

so filthy and vile a woman, she took some straw and set it on fire in

the middle of the room; but on seeing that it would as soon kill her

husband as awaken him, she plucked him by the arm, crying out--

“Fire! fire!”

If the husband was ashamed and sorry at being found by so virtuous a

wife in company with such a slut, he certainly had good reason for it.

Then said his wife to him--

“For a year, sir, have I tried by gentle and patient means to draw you

from this wickedness, and to show you that whilst washing the outside

you should also cleanse that which is within. Finding that all I could

do was of no avail, I have sought assistance from that clement which

brings all things to an end, and I promise you, sir, that, if this

do not mend you, I know not whether I shall a second time be able to

deliver you from the danger as I have now done. I pray you remember that

the deepest despair is that caused by love, and that if I had not had

the fear of God before my eyes I could not have endured so much.”

The husband, glad to get off so easily, promised that he would never

again cause her any pain on his account. This the lady was very willing

to believe, and with her husband’s consent turned away the servant who

had so offended her. And from that time forth they lived most lovingly

together, so that even the errors of the past, by the good that had

resulted from them, served but to increase their happiness.

“Should God give you such husbands, ladies, I pray you despair not until

you have fully tried all means to win them back. There are twenty-four

hours in the day in which a man may change his mind, and a wife who

has gained her husband over by patience and longsuffering should deem

herself more fortunate than if fate and her kinsfolk had given her one

more perfect.”

“It is an example,” said Oisille, “that all married women ought to

follow.”

“Follow it who will,” said Parlamente; “for my own part, I should

find it impossible to be patient so long. Although in every condition

patience is a seemly virtue, yet I think that in wedded life it finally

produces ill-will. For, when suffering is caused you by your partner,

you are compelled to keep yourself as much apart from him as possible;

and from such estrangement there springs up contempt for the faithless

one; and this contempt gradually lessens love, for a thing is loved in

proportion as it is esteemed.”

“But there is a danger,” said Ennasuite, “that the impatient wife may

meet with a passionate husband who, instead of patience, will bring her

pain.”

“And what more,” said Parlamente, “could a husband do than was done by

the husband in the story?”

“What more?” said Ennasuite. “Why, beat his wife soundly, and make her

lie in the smaller bed, and his sweetheart in the larger.” (2)

2 At this period, and for some time afterwards, there were

usually two beds in the master’s room, a large one for

himself and his wife, and a small one in which slept a

trusty servant, male or female. These little beds are shown

in some of the designs engraved by Abraham Bosse in the

seventeenth century.--L.

“It is my belief,” said Parlamente, “that a true woman would be less

grieved by being beaten in anger than by being contemned for one of less

worth than herself. After enduring the severance of love, nothing that

her husband could do would be able to cause her any further pain. And in

this wise the story says that the trouble she took to regain him was for

the sake of her children--which I can well believe.”

“And do you think that it showed great patience on her part,” said

Nomerfide, “to kindle a fire beneath the bed on which her husband was

sleeping.”

“Yes,” said Longarine; “for when she saw the smoke she waked him, and

herein, perhaps, was she most to blame; for the ashes of such a husband

as hers would to my thinking have been good for the making of lye.”

“You are cruel, Longarine,” said Oisille, “but those are not the terms

on which you lived with your own husband.”

“No,” said Longarine, “for, God be thanked, he never gave me cause. I

have reason to regret him all my life long, not to complain of him.”

“But if he had behaved in such a manner towards you,” said Nomerfide,

“what would you have done?”

“I loved him so dearly,” said Longarine, “that I believe I should have

killed him, and myself as well. To die after taking such a vengeance

would have been sweeter to me than to live faithfully with the

faithless.”

“So far as I can see,” said Hircan, “you do not love your husbands

except for your own sakes. If they are what you want them to be, you

are very fond of them; but if they fall into the slightest error towards

you, they lose on a Saturday the toil of an entire week. Thus you are

minded to rule, and I for my part will consent to it provided, however,

that all other husbands agree.”

“It is reasonable,” said Parlamente, “that man should rule us as our

head, but not that he should forsake us or treat us ill.”

“God has provided so wisely,” said Oisille, “both for man and for woman,

that I hold marriage, if it be not abused, to be the goodliest and

securest condition imaginable, and I am sure that, whatever they may

seem to do, all here present think the same. And if the man claims to

be wiser than the woman, he will be the more severely blamed should the

fault come from him. But enough of such talk. Let us now see to whom

Dagoucin will give his vote.”

“I give it,” he said, “to Longarine.”

“You do me a great pleasure,” she replied, “for I have read a story that

is worthy to follow yours. Since we are set upon praising the virtuous

patience of ladies, I will show you one more worthy of praise than she

of whom we have just been speaking. And she is the more deserving of

esteem in that she was a city dame, and therefore one of those whose

breeding is less virtuous than that of others.”

[Illustration: 081.jpg Tailpiece]

[Illustration: 083a.jpg The Lady of Tours questioning her Husband’s Mistress]

[The Lady of Tours questioning her Husband’s Mistress]

[Illustration: 083.jpg Page Image]

_TALE XXXVIII_.

_A towns-woman of Tours returned so much good for all the

evil treatment she had received from her husband, that the

latter forsook the mistress whom he was quietly maintaining,

and returned to his wife_. (1)

1 It is probable that the incidents related in this tale

occurred between 1460 and 1470. They will be found recorded

in the _Ménagier de Paris_. (See Baron Pichon’s edition,

1847, vol. i. p. 237). A similar narrative figures in some

editions of Morlini’s tales, notably the _Novello, Fabello,

et Comedies, Neapoli_, 1520. We further find it in

Gueudeville’s translation of Erasmus’s Colloquies (_Dialogue

sur le mariage, collogues, &c., Leyden_, 1720, vol. i. p.

87), and Mr. Walter Keily has pointed out (the _Heptameron_,

Bohn, 1864) that William Warner worked the same incidents

into his poem _Albion’s England_, his stanzas being

reproduced in Percy’s _Reliques_ under the title of _The

Patient Countess_.--L. and Ed.

In the city of Tours there dwelt a chaste and comely townswoman, who, by

reason of her virtues, was not only loved but feared also and respected

by her husband. Nevertheless, with all the fickleness of men who grow

weary of ever eating good bread, he fell in love with a farm tenant (2)

of his own, and would oft-time leave Tours to visit the farm, where he

always remained two or three days; and when he came back to Tours he was

always in so sorry a plight that his wife had much ado to cure him, yet,

as soon as he was whole again, he never failed to return to the place

where pleasure caused him to forget all his ills.

2 The French word here is _métayère_. The _métayer_ (fem.

métayère) was a farm tenant under the general control of his

landlord, who supplied him with seed and took to himself a

considerable portion of the produce. The system was done

away with at the Revolution, but was revived here and there

under the Restoration, when some of the nobles came to

“their own” again, and there may even nowadays be a few

instances of the kind.--Ed.

When his wife, who was anxious above all things for his life and health,

found him constantly return home in so evil a plight, she went to the

farm and found there the young woman whom her husband loved. Then,

without anger but with graceful courage, she told her that she knew her

husband often went to see her, but that she was ill-pleased to find him

always return home exhausted in consequence of her sorry treatment of

him. The poor woman, influenced as much by respect for her mistress

as by regard for the truth, was not able to deny the fact, and craved

forgiveness.

The lady asked to see the room and bed in which her husband was wont

to sleep, and found it so cold and dirty and ill-appointed that she was

moved to pity. Forthwith she sent for a good bed furnished with sheets,

blankets and counterpane such as her husband loved; she caused the room

to be made clean and neat and hung with tapestries; provided suitable

ware for his meat and drink, a pipe of good wine, sweetmeats and

confections, and begged the woman to send him back no more in so

miserable a state.

It was not long before the husband again went, as was his wont, to see

his tenant, and he was greatly amazed to find his poor lodging in such

excellent order. And still more was he surprised when the woman gave him

to drink in a silver cup; and he asked her whence all these good things

had come. The poor woman told him, weeping, that they were from his

wife, who had taken such great pity on his sorry treatment that she had

furnished the house in this way, and had charged her to be careful of

his health.

When the gentleman saw the exceeding generosity of his wife in returning

so much good for all the evil turns that he had done her, he looked upon

his own wrongdoing as no less great than her kindness; and, after giving

some money to his tenant, he begged her to live in future as an honest

woman. Then he went back to his wife, acknowledged his wrongdoing, and

told her that, but for her great gentleness and generosity, he

could never have forsaken the life that he had been leading. And

thenceforward, forgetting the past, they lived in all peacefulness

together.

“You may be sure, ladies, that there are but few husbands whom a wife’s

love and patience cannot win at last, unless they be harder even than

stone, which weak and yielding water will in time make hollow.”

“That woman,” said Parlamente, “had neither heart, gall nor liver.”

“What would you have had her do?” said Longarine. “She practised what

God commands, and returned good for evil.” (3)

3 “Recompense to no man evil for evil.”--_Rom_. xii. 17.

“Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing.”--1

_Pet_. iii. 9.--Ed.

“I think,” said Hircan, “she must have been in love with some Grey

Friar, who had laid upon her the penance of having her husband well

treated in the country, so that, meantime, she might be free to

entertain herself well in the town.”

“Therein,” said Oisille, “you clearly show the wickedness of your own

heart, judging ill of a good deed. I rather believe her to have been so

subdued by the love of God that she cared for naught save the salvation

of her husband’s soul.”

“It seems to me,” said Simontault, “that he had more reason to return

to his wife when he was so cold at the farm than afterwards when he was

treated so well.”

“From what I can see,” said Saffredent, “you are not of the same opinion

as the rich man of Paris who, when he lay with his wife, could not put

off his gear without being chilled, but who never felt the worse when

he went without cap or shoes, in the depth of winter, to see his

servant-maid in the cellar. Yet his wife was very beautiful and the maid

very ugly.”

“Have you not heard,” said Geburon, “that God always aids lunatics,

lovers and sots? Perhaps he was all three in one.”

“Do you thence conclude,” said Pariamente, “that God recks not of the

wise, the chaste and the temperate? Help is not needed by those who can

help themselves. He who said that He had come for the sick and not for

the whole, (4) came by the law of His mercy to succour our infirmities,

thereby annulling the decrees of His rigorous justice; and he that deems

himself wise is a fool in the sight of God. But, to end the sermon, to

whom will Longarine give her vote?”

4 “They that are whole have no need of the physician, but

they that are sick.”--_St. Mark_ ii. 17. See also _St.

Luke_ v. 31.--Ed.

“I give it,” she said, “to Saffredent.”

“Then I hope,” said Saffredent, “to prove to you that God does not

favour lovers. For although it has already been said, ladies, that vice

is common to men and women alike, yet will a subtle artifice be more

readily and adroitly devised by a woman than by a man Of this I am now

about to give you an instance.”

[Illustration: 088.jpg Tailpiece]

[Illustration: 089a.jpg The Lord of Grignaulx catching the Pretended Ghost]

[The Lord of Grignaulx catching the Pretended Ghost]

[Illustration: 089.jpg Page Image]

_TALE XXXIX_.

_The Lord of Grignaulx freed his house from a ghost which

had so tormented his wife that for the space of two years

she had dwelt elsewhere_.

A certain Lord of Grignaulx (1) who was gentleman of honour to the Queen

of France, Anne, Duchess of Brittany, on returning to his house whence

he had been absent during more than two years, found his wife at another

estate, near by, and when he inquired the reason of this, she told him

that a ghost was wont to haunt the house, and tormented them so much

that none could dwell there. (2) Monsieur de Grig-naulx, who had no

belief in such absurdities, replied that were it the devil himself he

was not afraid of him, and so brought his wife home again.

At night he caused many candles to be lighted that he might see the

ghost more clearly, and, after watching for a long time without hearing

anything, he fell asleep; but immediately afterwards he was awaked by a

buffet upon the cheek, and heard a voice crying, “Brenigne, Brenigne,”

which had been the name of his grandmother. (3) Then he called to the

serving-woman, who lay near them, (4) to light the candle, for all were

now extinguished, but she durst not rise. And at the same time the Lord

of Grig-naulx felt the covering pulled from off him, and heard a great

noise of tables, trestles and stools falling about the room; and this

lasted until morning. However, the Lord of Grignaulx was more displeased

at losing his rest than afraid of the ghost, for indeed he never

believed it to be any such thing.

1 This is John de Talleyrand, knight, lord of Grignols and

Fouquerolles, Prince of Chalais, Viscount of Fronsac, mayor

and captain of Bordeaux, chamberlain of Charles VIII., first

majordomo and gentleman of honour in turn to two French

Queens, Anne of Brittany and Mary of England. His wife was

Margaret de la Tour, daughter of Anne de la Tour, Viscount

of Turenne, and Mary de Beaufort. She bore him several

children. It was John de Talleyrand who warned Louise of

Savoy that her son Francis, then Count of Angoulême, was

paying court to the young Queen, Mary of England, wife to

Louis XII. Apprehensive lest this intrigue should destroy

her son’s prospects, Louise prevailed on him to relinquish

it (Brantôme’s _Dames Illustres_).--L. 4 89

2 The house haunted by the ghost would probably be

Talleyrand’s château at Grignols, in the department of the

Gironde. His lordship of Fouquerolles was only a few miles

distant, in the Dordogne, and this would be the estate to

which his wife had retired.--Ed.

3 Talleyrand’s grandmother on the paternal side was Mary of

Brabant; the reference may be to his maternal grandmother,

whose Christian name was possibly “Bénigne.” On the other

hand, Boaistuau gives the name as Revigne, and among the old

French _noblesse_ were the Revigné and Revigny families.--

Ed.

The Tales of the Heptameron, Vol. 4 (of 5) · 第 35 / 61 题