INQUIRIES AT WICK

At Wick many of the resident fishermen are nothing but

fishermen; but some who fish from Wick in summer have small

farms along the coast, and many of the hired men who are required

for the herring fishing come from Highland districts, where they

combine agricultural and seafaring occupations during the rest of

the year. The paper by Mr. M'Lennan of Wick affords interesting

information with regard to the Wick fisheries. It shows, by the

experience of the haddock fishing and the winter cod fishing,

that payment to crews fishing on shares, or 'on deal' as it is there

called, may easily be made each Saturday night; by that of the

winter herring fishing that payment may be made at landing the

fish, and by that of the Lewis herring fishery, how a settlement in

a very extensive fishing with complicated arrangements is made

immediately at the close of the fishing season.

[Mr M'Lennan, Appendix II; D. Davidson, G.S. Sutherland,

16,806, 16,750.]

At Wick the herring fishing alone is directly affected by the

indebtedness of the fishermen, and in it alone is the settlement

delayed for two months after the close of the season. The amount

of indebtedness existing among the fishermen, and its effects upon

the bargains which they make, is remarkable. In Shetland, as has

been seen, one-third, and in some districts a much less proportion,

of the fishermen is indebted to the curers. There, £20 or £30 is a

very large debt for a fisherman to owe, and such debts make no

disadvantageous distinction between the debtors and other

fishermen in regard to the price paid for the fish. At Wick, on

the contrary, the expense of boats and nets is so great, that debts

of £200 and upwards are not uncommon; and all who owe above

a certain amount are obliged to fish for 20 per cent., or according

to another witness 1s. per cran, less than free men get. These

statements agree with the information I received personally from

a large fish-curer at Wick. Mr. M'Lennan says that 'there is no

such thing as truck; and payment, when payment is owing, is made

in cash.' But it appears both from his paper and from the evidence

of Mr. Sutherland, that at Wick, and in the Hebrides and West

Highlands, the men cannot prosecute the fishing without supplies

being advanced to them. Except, however, as regards boats

and fishing materials, these advances are not made directly by

the curers, who do not keep provision shops but by the local

shopkeepers upon 'lines' or guarantees by the curers. 'It is

tolerable certain,' says Mr. M'Lennan, 'that the curer receives an

abatement or discount from the merchants' prices of meal, goods,

ropes, nets, or other things which the fishermen procure on his

guarantee.' Nothing, indeed, can be more probable; but no inquiry

being made into transactions between curers and fishermen out of

Shetland, except for the purposes of suggestion and comparison, I

am not able to say whether such a system of disguised truck does

in fact prevail.

[G.S. Sutherland, 16,805.]

It seems to be fairly deducible from this evidence, that cash

payments for fish are not impracticable and inexpedient, as some

witnesses have said. The condition of fishermen in Wick and

the West Highlands shows further that Shetland is not, as has

sometimes been thought, a peculiar and exceptional country.

Elsewhere also fishermen have crofts, are poor, and in debt;

require advances for boats, fishing implements, and provisions;

and obtain them from or through the curers to whom they sell their

fish. The evidence given before the Select Committee on the Irish

Sea Fisheries Bill of 1867 shows that the condition of many

fishermen on the Irish coast is worse in regard to indebtedness

than that of any in Shetland.

The question may then be asked, whether a partial and local

remedy should be applied to Shetland, while nothing is done for

the fishermen of other districts; and whether it is expedient to pass

an Act of Parliament for the protection of a particular trade in a

single county, unless it be fully ascertained that its circumstances

are materially different from those of the same trade in the rest of

the empire. It is for Her Majesty's Government to decide whether

it can introduce a measure for the repression of truck, and the

regulation of agreements between fishermen and their employers,

without having information as to the nature of the present relations

between these parties throughout the empire.

There is a good deal to lead to the conclusion, if any general

conclusion may be formed from a local and partial investigation,

that fishermen and fish-curers may fairly be subjected to

regulations analogous to those which the Merchant Shipping Act

lays down for the engagement of seamen. It is also a point worthy

of consideration, whether the prohibition of set-off should not be

extended to all dealings between fishermen and fish-merchants,

with this exception, that the curer or merchant should be at liberty

to retain one third of each week's or month's earnings for payment

of any boats or lines supplied to the fishermen by him or on his

guarantee. The carelessness or incompetence of fishermen in

regard to pass-books and accounts, suggests also the propriety of a

limitation of action upon such accounts to three months, with a

provision that no acknowledgments shall bar prescription unless

holograph, or signed before witnesses.

Second Shetland Truck System Report · 第 140 / 467 题