2. ADDITION TO THE REVISED EDITION (1918).

The argumentation of this book is built up on the fact of intuitive

thinking, which may be experienced in a purely spiritual way, and which

every perception inserts into reality so that reality comes thereby to

be known. All that this book aimed at presenting was the result of a

survey from the basis of our experience of intuitive thinking. However,

the intention also was to emphasise the systematic interpretation which

this thinking, as experienced by us, demands. It demands that we shall

not deny its presence in cognition as a self-sustaining experience. It

demands that we acknowledge its capacity for experiencing reality in

co-operation with perception, and that we do not make it seek reality

in a world outside experience and accessible only to inference, in

the face of which human thinking would be only a subjective activity.

This view characterises thinking as that factor in man through which

he inserts himself spiritually into reality. (And, strictly, no one

should confuse this kind of world-view, which is based on thinking as

directly experienced, with mere Rationalism.) But, on the other hand,

the whole tenor of the preceding argumentation shows that perception

yields a determination of reality for human knowledge only when it

is taken hold of in thinking. Outside of thinking there is nothing to

characterise reality for what it is. Hence we have no right to imagine

that sense-perception is the only witness to reality. Whatever comes

to us by way of perception on our journey through life, we cannot

but expect. The only point open to question would be whether, from

the exclusive point of view of thinking as we intuitively experience

it, we have a right to expect that over and above sensuous perception

there is also spiritual perception. This expectation is justified. For,

though intuitive thinking is, on the one hand, an active process taking

place in the human mind, it is, on the other hand, also a spiritual

perception mediated by no sense-organ. It is a perception in which the

percipient is himself active, and a self-activity which is at the same

time perceived. In intuitive thinking man enters a spiritual world

also as a percipient. Whatever within this world presents itself to

him as percept in the same way in which the spiritual world of his own

thinking so presents itself, that is recognised by him as constituting

a world of spiritual perception. This world of spiritual perception we

may suppose to be standing in the same relation to thinking as does,

on the sensuous side, the world of sense-perception. Man does not

experience the world of spiritual perception as an alien something,

because he is already familiar in his intuitive thinking with an

experience of purely spiritual character. With such a world of

spiritual perception a number of the writings are concerned which

I have published since this present book appeared. The Philosophy

of Spiritual Activity lays the philosophical foundation for these

later writings. For it attempts to show that in the very experience

of thinking, rightly understood, we experience Spirit. This is the

reason why it appears to the author that no one will stop short of

entering the world of spiritual perception who has been able to adopt,

in all seriousness, the point of view of the Philosophy of Spiritual

Activity. True, logical deduction--by syllogisms--will not extract

out of the contents of this book the contents of the author's later

books. But a living understanding of what is meant in this book by

"intuitive thinking" will naturally prepare the way for living entry

into the world of spiritual perception.

The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity A Modern Philosophy of Life Developed by Scientific Methods · 第 56 / 80 题