CHAPTER XXV

_Ill Health; Extra Leave; Deputy Principal Librarian; Departure for

Naples; Storm; Naples; Excursions; La Cava; Monte Cassino;

Monastic Societies; Return to England._

After his return from Biarritz the strain to which the constitution

of Panizzi had been subjected by his laborious life gave him decided

warning of failing powers. Amongst other disagreeable symptoms he

suffered much from _insomnia_. On several occasions he informed the

author of these memoirs that he feared he should be compelled to

relinquish his position at the British Museum; nevertheless he

continued to carry on his work with ardour. He rose every morning at

8 o’clock, and appeared at his post by 10. Struggling against

growing infirmities, and using every means to restore his health and

perform his duties, he applied to the Trustees for leave of absence

from the 15th of Dec., 1862, to the 1st of May following. It need

not be said that his request was granted. As Principal Librarian it

was incumbent on him before leaving to fix upon some competent

officer to discharge his important duties; and this substitute he

very soon found in the person of his longwhile colleague Mr. J.

Winter Jones, at that time Keeper of the Printed Book Department.

This gentleman he nominated as his deputy in accordance with the

rules of the Institution set forth in the 2nd Chap., §§ 2 and 3 of

the statutes. The document, which gave legal force to this temporary

transfer of office, was signed by the Archbishop of Canterbury, and

the Speaker of the House of Commons, on the 9th of December, 1862.

Soon afterwards Panizzi received a kind and sympathizing letter from

Sir G. Cornewall Lewis, dated December 16, 1862:—

“Some of your friends are apprehensive that your labours at the

Museum have been detrimental to your health, and are of opinion

that you would derive some benefit from a short interval of rest.

I was not aware, when I had the pleasure of seeing you yesterday,

that you had been unwell; but pray let me know whether you are

desirous of leaving London for a time for the sake of your health.

If you are, the matter might doubtless be represented to the

Trustees.

“I have read your report upon the present state of accommodation

at the Museum.

“After the recess, I intend to move for a Committee on the

National Gallery question, to which the papers relating to the

deficient space at the Museum may be referred.”

On the 18th of December Panizzi, accompanied by the author, who

had been sent from school, started for Naples. So far as

Marseilles the journey was satisfactorily accomplished, the

travellers occupying a special carriage, provided by order of the

Emperor. Panizzi had called on His Majesty on his way through

Paris, and thus this accommodation had been afforded him. Arriving

at Marseilles, the travellers embarked on board one of the

_Messageries_ steamers, trusting to reach Naples by Christmas Day.

A terrific storm, however, which burst upon them shortly after

starting, delayed their progress; so severe was it that at one

moment they were in jeopardy of their lives. At last, after a most

tedious passage, Civita-Vecchia was sighted. Here they landed,

and, leaving it on the following day, reached Naples on the 26th.

As in 1852, Panizzi went to Lady Holland’s residence at the Palazzo

Roccella, whence he sent Mr. Ellice (January 13, 1863) his first

observations on the changes which had taken place at Naples:—

“... This country, after centuries of misgovernment, will take many

years before it derives from the new state of things the advantages

which we all wish; there is, however, an undeniable improvement, in

spite of the priests, the brigands, and the Emperor of the French,

in everything. The dislike of the Bourbons is general, and there is

no Muratist party; but the late Italian Ministry has done everything

in its power to create dissatisfaction by the pedantry of its

regulations, the total disregard of the habits, feelings, and

prejudices of this ignorant population, and the incredible want of

tact in its agents.”

Just at the time of the arrival at Naples, an English gentleman had

been arrested there on the charge of being the bearer of treasonable

letters from Rome. He happened to be a friend of Panizzi’s, and

consequently no little anxiety and apprehension arose in the mind of

the latter regarding his future destiny. On an early day in January

therefore, Panizzi, Lord Henry Lennox, and the writer set out to

visit the prisoner; the necessary permission to do so was not,

however, obtained without considerable difficulty. By an extract

from a letter on this case, written by the first-named to a friend,

it seems that since the disappearance of the old _régime_ some

considerable improvement in the treatment of political offenders had

been introduced:—

“Jan. 13th.

“I have just been to see Mr. X—--, and I must say that a better

prison I never saw. He has a magnificent view, good food, books,

and is allowed to see friends. The Governor, who is a worthy man,

retired the moment we entered the room., There was some difficulty

in allowing young Fagan to enter the prison, so we made use of him

by telling him to take note of all he saw. The sentence passed on

our friend is certainly severe, but he fully deserves it. Still, I

am doing my best to get him off as lightly as is possible.”

Panizzi took a sensible view of the way of enjoying and availing

himself of the advantages of a vacation. To his active mind, perfect

quiescence was not for a moment to be tolerated; and he resolved

upon that wholesome and necessary recreation and diversion, which

have so great a tendency to restore relaxed vigour. Delightful were

the excursions made in and around Naples. One of these was to the

celebrated Benedictine Monastery of La Trinità della Cava, founded

in 1011 by Alferius Pappacarboni, its first Abbot. Here the library,

with its rare and priceless contents, was, as may be imagined, the

chief point of attraction. The visitors were to have been

accompanied by the then abbot, Pappalettere, who, as well as Padre

Tosti, of Monte Cassino, was a much esteemed friend of both Mr.

Gladstone and Panizzi. Unfortunately Pappalettere had lately got

himself into bad odour with the Pope, having rashly expressed

himself respecting the Italian cause in terms too favourable to suit

the taste of his Holiness, and had, in consequence, been summoned to

Rome to give an account of his conduct. Panizzi, consulted as to the

course he would recommend him to adopt, at once advised him to

disregard the invitation, and to remain quietly where he was—sound

advice, and, as the sequel shows, wise, had it been acted on. There

are individuals, however, who, asking for advice, disregard it, and

adopt the contrary course; and in this instance one of this class

was Pappalettere. Obeying the Pope, he went to Rome, and, as a

reward for his obedience, underwent what can be expressed by no

other words than some years of close confinement. On one expedition

to La Cava the travellers had a narrow escape from a sudden

termination to their earthly career. In proceeding along a portion

of the road, bordering on a deep precipice, either from the

overladen state of the carriage or from the bad condition of the

road, a wheel came off. The promptitude and agility of the driver,

saved the party from inevitable destruction. Jumping down, he at

once pulled the horses from the threatening precipice; but for his

presence of mind the writer would not have been here to record the

mishap nor to present the world with this memoir.

Another visit in the neighbourhood was to Monte Cassino, founded by

St. Benedict A.D. 529, on the site of a temple of Apollo. It is

situated on a mountain from which it derives its name, near the

ruins of the ancient Casinum, and approached by a well-paved and

winding road, the ascent of which occupies about two hours. The

Abbey in the eleventh and twelfth centuries was the seat of science,

particularly of medicine, the celebrated School of Salerno having

been founded by the monks of Monte Cassino.

Of this monastery, Dante thus speaks in Canto XXII. of the

“Paradiso,” line 37:—

Quel monte, a cui Cassino è nella costa,

Fu frequentato già in sulla cima

Dalla gente ingannata e mal disposta.

Ed io son quel che su vi portai prima

Lo nome di Colui che in terra addusse

La verità che tanto ci sublima;

E tanta grazia sovra me rilusse,

Ch’ io ritrassi le ville circostanti

Dall’ empio culto che il mondo sedusse.

---

... In old days,

That mountain, at whose side Cassino rests,

Was, on its height, frequented by a race

Deceived and ill-disposed; and I it was,

Who thither carried first the name of Him,

Who brought the soul-subliming truth to man.

And such a speeding grace shone over me,

That from their impious worship I reclaim’d

The dwellers round about, who with the world

Were in delusion lost....

—(_Cary’s Translation._)

At the time of this visit the founder’s tomb was in course of

restoration, and amongst those who contributed to the good work was

Mr. Gladstone, who requested Panizzi to pay, in his name, to the

restoration fund the sum of 100 ducats, equivalent to about £16 of

English money.

One of the first acts of the newly-established Government of Italy

was the suppression of the religious houses. Although it cannot be

denied by the candid student of history that, in mediæval times,

Monastic Societies were of the utmost benefit, and, indeed, in many

respects, actually necessary to civilization, and to many other

important ends; and although the debt we owe them for the

preservation of literature and art, which, but for their fostering

care, would have eternally perished, can never be duly estimated;

yet it must be admitted by the most determined lover of antiquity

that, in the state of modern society, the monastery is at the

present day somewhat out of place. The ends such Institutions

formerly subserved, and their power to subserve such ends, have

alike become extinct. In our times they appear to exist simply to

perpetuate the vicious and unreasonable principle that a man may

live in the world, yet not be of it, that he may cast aside his

duties as a citizen and every feeling which binds him to his

country, sacrificing such sacred obligations to the devout (and

selfish) care of his own soul.

At the time of which we write, Italy, above all nations, abounded to

superfluity in these establishments; and suspicions, not ill-founded

nor unreasonable, were entertained of the loyalty of some of their

members, from the perpetual drain made by them on the able-bodied

population.

It is, however, to be regretted that the officials to whom was

entrusted the dissolution of the convents of Italy did not set about

their far from pleasant duties in such a manner as to contrast more

favourably with the conduct of Henry VIII. under similar

circumstances, whereas they displayed an amount of harshness and

brutality—nay, cruelty—calculated to throw discredit not only on

themselves, but on the country by which they were employed, and,

what is more serious still, on the character of Italians in general.

-------

Panizzi, ever alive to injustice and cruelty, and jealous of the

fair fame of his country, with an equal abhorrence of the wrongs

committed in the name of freedom and of a liberal constitution,

though weighed with the tyrannies of King Bomba, was especially

indignant at the conduct of the Commission. On this painful subject

he gave free vent to his feelings in a letter dated the 13th of

January, 1863, and, as the following lines will show, did not

confine himself to a simple expression of feeling:—

“... What will you think of my having turned protector of monks

and nuns? Yet such is the fact. I have been so disgusted with the

harsh proceedings of the President of the Commission appointed to

take possession of the property of religious corporations that I

could not help doing my best to get the fellow removed from his

office; and I am glad to say he has been recalled to Turin by

telegraph, and another person appointed, of whom everybody speaks

well. The illegalities which are committed are innumerable....”

Similar sentiments are expressed in another letter to Mr. Gladstone,

from which the following is an extract:

“Naples, January 18, 1863.

“... So soon as I arrived here I found that the person who was at

the head of the Commission for the suppression of convents,

monasteries, &c., behaved with unjustifiable harshness and

rudeness: the dissatisfaction and discontent his conduct caused

cannot be exaggerated. I backed the representations made to the

Ministers to put an end to this abuse of authority, and the fellow

was recalled by telegraph.”

These honourable protests against oppression, and possibly others

more openly made in language equally forcible, caused an abundance

of silly surmises and talk of the conversion of Panizzi, and of his

having become an adherent of the Pope and of the Bourbons, &c., &c.

Utterly unworthy as were these of being repeated, we should leave

the subject unmentioned, did it not afford the opportunity of

introducing a letter, dated Turin, the 2nd of April, 1863, too

important to be omitted, from that distinguished diplomatist and

most amiable of men, Sir James Hudson:—

“This is the first quiet moment I have had since I received yours

of the 25th.

“How can you seriously pay attention to the chatterboxes of

Naples, who had written here that you had gone over to the enemy?

But, my dear friend, you don’t suppose that in Upper Italy anybody

would believe such ridiculous gossip!

“I knew very well that you would have come here at once had I

asked you to do so. But the necessity, the strait we were in, was

not sufficiently great to require that sacrifice. I will tell you

what it is when we meet.

“And now about meeting. I still say, ‘Don’t put yourself out,’

don’t come to Genoa merely to see Giacomino. If you come to Genoa,

you _must_ come here. It’s all very well to say, ‘I don’t want to

see anybody but you.’ Well, that’s like _you_; but it won’t do.

_You_ cannot come so near Turin, and not come to Turin. You occupy

too large a space in the Italian and European eye. Many people

want to see you especially Minghetti and Amari, and doubtless

Peruzzi.

“The journey is nothing now over the Mont Cenis. If you say

positively you won’t, why I can’t help it; but I repeat, don’t

come to Genoa if you won’t come to Turin. But if you do come to

Genoa I will meet you there. We shall meet in July at all events,

for I am quite serious in declaring my intention of residing with

you at the British Museum, and am very grateful for the kind

reception you have given to my proposition.

“I have read your letter _three times_, which is what I never did

for a Foreign Office instruction.

“I have not a word of news to send you.

“God bless you!

“GIACOMINO.”

On the 1st of May, 1863, Panizzi returned to his duties at the

Museum; and with melancholy reflections we must here record that his

life of action had practically reached its limits; not, however,

that the patriot’s zeal had in any way decayed, nor had the

politician’s interest in public affairs relaxed one iota.

To this point we have endeavoured briefly to follow up the fortunes

of Italy from the year 1820. How much energy had been expended, how

many lives of her truest sons had been devoted to the achievement of

her liberty and union, and how far England had lent her powerful aid

towards the accomplishment of the dearest wishes of patriotic

Italians, it is beyond our province to discuss, and we leave such

questions to be answered in the sterner pages of history.

Though natural decay crept on Panizzi, and though he felt his powers

decreasing, he still continued his activity of body and mind, not

resigning himself, as many men would have done, to indolence and

absolute rest, but still taking an interest in all that was

occurring around him, proffering aid and counsel where it was

required or willingly received, and turning a stern countenance to

everything approaching injustice.

Returning to his official duties in England, he cheerfully resigned

the beauties of his native Italy, although to him they must have had

an especial charm, and doubtless he coincided with the patriotic

Neapolitan who exclaimed:—

“Vedi Napoli e poi muori!”

Yet not in this balmy air, nor within the influences of that sea

whose azure tint delights the eye did he linger; duty called him

thence, and at the post of duty was Panizzi ever to be found.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Illustration]

The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 2 (of 2) Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc. · 第 12 / 15 章