151. A great step is here gained. You notice that the middle numbers

are the largest. They correspond to the central portion of the

glacier. Hence, these measurements conclusively establish, not only

the fact of glacier motion, but that _the centre of a glacier, like

that of a river, moves more rapidly than the sides_.

152. With the aid of trained engineers M. Agassiz followed up these

measurements in subsequent years. His researches are recorded in a

work entitled "Système glaciaire," which is accompanied by a very

noble Atlas of the Glacier of the Unteraar, published in 1847.

153. These determinations were made by means of a theodolite, of

which I will give you some notion immediately. The same instrument

was employed the same year by the late Professor Forbes upon the

Mer de Glace. He established independently the greater central

motion. He showed, moreover, that it is not necessary to wait a

year, or even a week to determine the motion of a glacier; with a

correctly-adjusted theodolite he was able to determine the motion

of various points of the Mer de Glace from day to day. He affirmed,

and with truth, that the motion of the glacier might be determined

from hour to hour. We shall prove this farther on (162). Professor

Forbes also triangulated the Mer de Glace, and laid down an excellent

map of it. His first observations and his survey are recorded in a

celebrated book published in 1843, and entitled "Travels in the Alps."

154. These observations were also followed up in subsequent years,

the results being recorded in a series of detached letters and essays

of great interest. These were subsequently collected in a volume

entitled "Occasional Papers on the Theory of Glaciers," published in

1859. The labours of Agassiz and Forbes are the two chief sources of

our knowledge of glacier phenomena.

§ 21. _The Theodolite and its Use. Our own Measurements._

155. My object thus far is attained. I have given you proofs of

glacier motion, and a historic account of its measurement. And

now we must try to add a little to the knowledge of glaciers by

our own labours on the ice. Resolution must not be wanting at

the commencement of our work, nor steadfast patience during its

prosecution. Look then at this theodolite; it consists mainly of a

telescope and a graduated circle, the telescope capable of motion

up and down, and the circle, carrying the telescope along with it,

capable of motion right and left. When desired to make the motion

exceedingly fine and minute, suitable screws, called tangent screws,

are employed. The instrument is supported by three legs, movable, but

firm when properly planted.

156. Two spirit-levels are fixed at right angles to each other on

the circle just referred to. Practice enables one to take hold of

the legs of the instrument, and so to fix them that the circle shall

be nearly horizontal. By means of four levelling screws we render it

_accurately_ horizontal. Exactly under the centre of the instrument

is a small hook from which a plummet is suspended; the point of the

bob just touches a rock on which we make a mark; or if the earth be

soft underneath, we drive a stake into it exactly under the plummet.

By re-suspending the plummet at any future time we can find to a

hairbreadth the position occupied by the instrument to-day.

157. Look through the telescope; you see it crossed by two fibres

of the finest spider's thread. In actual work we first direct the

telescope across the glacier, until the intersection of the two

fibres accurately covers some well-defined point of rock or tree at

the other side of the valley. This, our fixed standard, we sketch

with its surroundings in a note-book, so as to be able immediately

to recognise it on our return to this place. Imagine a straight line

drawn from the centre of the telescope to this point, and that this

line is permitted to drop straight down upon the glacier, every point

of it falling as a stone would fall; along such a line we have now to

fix a series of stakes.

158. A trained assistant is already upon the glacier. He erects

his staff and stands behind it; the telescope is lowered without

swerving to the right or to the left; in mathematical language it

remains _in the same vertical plane_. The crossed fibres of the

telescope probably strike the ice a little away from the staff of the

assistant; by a wave of the arm he moves right or left; he may move

too much, so we wave him back again. After a trial or two he knows

whether he is near the proper point, and if so makes his motions

small. He soon exactly strikes the point covered by the intersection

of the fibres. A signal is made which tells him that he is right; he

pierces the ice with an auger and drives in a stake. He then goes

forward, and in precisely the same manner takes up another point.

After one or two stakes have been driven in, the assistant is able to

take up the other points very rapidly. Any requisite number of stakes

may thus be fixed in a straight line across the glacier.

159. Next morning we measure the motion of all the stakes. The

theodolite is mounted in its former position and carefully levelled.

The telescope is directed first upon the standard point at the

opposite side of the valley, being moved by a tangent screw until the

intersection of the spider's threads accurately covers the point.

The telescope is then lowered to the first stake, beside which our

trained assistant is already standing. He is provided with a staff

with feet and inches marked on it. A glance shows us the stake has

moved down. By our signals the assistant recovers the point from

which we started yesterday, and then determines the distance from

this point to the stake. It is, say, 6 inches; through this distance,

therefore, the stake has moved.

160. We are careful to note the hour and minute at which each stake

is driven in, and the hour and the minute when its distance from its

first position is measured; this enables us to calculate the accurate

_daily motion_ of the point in question. The distances through which

all the other points have moved are determined in precisely the same

way.

161. Thus we shall proceed to work, first making clear to our minds

what is to be done, and then making sure that it shall be accurately

done. To give our work reality, I will here record the actual

measurements executed, and the actual thoughts suggested, on the

Mer de Glace in 1857. The only unreality that I would ask you to

allow, is that you and I are supposed to be making the observations

together. The labour of measuring was undertaken for the most part

by Mr. Hirst.

§ 22. _Motion of the Mer de Glace._

162. On July 14, then, we find ourselves at the end of the Glacier

des Bois, not far from the source of the Arveiron. We direct our

telescope across the glacier, and fix the intersection of its

spider's threads accurately upon the edge of a pinnacle of ice. We

leave the instrument untouched, looking through it from hour to

hour. The edge of ice moves slowly, but plainly, past the fibres,

and at the end of three hours we assure ourselves that the motion

has amounted to several inches. While standing near the vault of the

Arveiron, and talking about going into it, its roof gives way, and

falls with the sound of thunder. It is not, therefore, without reason

that I warned you against entering these vaults in summer.

163. We ascend to the Montanvert Inn, fix on it as a residence, and

then descend to the lateral moraine of the glacier a little below the

inn. Here we erect our theodolite, and mark its exact position by

a plummet. We must first make sure that our line is perpendicular,

or nearly so, to the axis or middle line of the glacier. Our

instructed assistant lays down a long staff in the direction of

the axis, assuring himself, by looking up and down, that it is the

true direction. With another staff in his hand, pointed towards

our theodolite, he shifts his position until the second staff is

perpendicular to the first. Here he gives us a signal. We direct our

telescope upon him, and then gradually raising its end in a vertical

plane we find, and note by sketching, a standard point at the other

side of the glacier. This point known, and our plummet mark known, we

can on any future day find our line. (To render the measurements more

intelligible, I append on the next page an outline diagram of the Mer

de Glace, and of its tributaries.)

164. Along the line just described ten stakes were set on July 17,

1857. Their displacements were measured on the following day. Two of

them had fallen, but here are the distances passed over by the eight

remaining ones in twenty-four hours.

DAILY MOTION OF THE MER DE GLACE.

First Line: A A' upon the Sketch.

East West

Stake 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 10

Inches 12 17 23 26 25 26 27 33

165. You have already assured yourself by actual contact that the

body of the glacier is real ice, and you may have read that glaciers

move; but the actual observation of the motion of a body apparently

so rigid is strangely interesting. And not only does the ice move

bodily, but one part of it moves past another; the rate of motion

augmenting gradually from 12 inches a day at the side to 33 inches a

day at a distance from the side. This quicker movement of the central

ice of glaciers had been already observed by Agassiz and Forbes; we

verify their results, and now proceed to something new. Crossing the

Glacier du Géant, which occupies more than half the valley, we find

that our line of stakes is not yet at an end. The 10th stake stands

on the part of the ice which comes from the Talèfre.

[Illustration: OUTLINE PLAN, SHOWING THE MEASURED LINES OF THE MER DE

GLACE AND ITS TRIBUTARIES.]

166. Now the motion of the sides is slow, because of the friction of

the ice against its boundaries; but then one would think that midway

between the boundaries, where the friction of the sides is least, the

motion ought to be greatest. This is clearly not the case; for though

the 10th stake is nearer than the 9th to the eastern or _Chapeau_

side of the valley, the 10th stake surpasses the 9th by 6 inches a

day.

167. Here we have something to think of; but before a natural

philosopher can think with comfort he must be perfectly sure of his

facts. The foregoing line ran across the glacier a little below the

Montanvert. We will run another line across a little way above the

hotel. On July 18 we set out this line, and to multiply our chances

of discovery we place along it 31 stakes. On the subsequent day five

of these were found unfit for use; but here are the distances passed

over by the remaining six-and-twenty in 24 hours.

Second Line: B B' upon the Sketch.

West

Stake 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Inches 11 12 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 20 21 21

Stake 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Inches 23 23 23 21 23 21 25 22 22 23 25 26

East

168. Look at these numbers. The first broad fact they reveal is the

advance in the rate of motion from first to last. There are however

some irregularities; from 23 inches at the 17th stake we fall to 21

inches at the 18th; from 23 inches at the 19th we fall to 21 inches

at the 20th; from 25 inches at the 21st we fall to 22 inches at the

22nd and 23rd; but notwithstanding these small ups and downs, the

general advance of the rate of motion is manifest. Now there may have

been some slight displacement of the stakes by melting, sufficient to

account for these small deviations from uniformity in the increase

of the motion. But another solution is also possible. We shall

afterwards learn that the glacier is retarded not only by its sides

but by its bed; that the upper portions of the ice slide over the

lower ones. Now if the bed of the Mer de Glace should have eminences

here and there rising sufficiently near to the surface to retard the

motion of the surface, they might produce the small irregularities

noticed above.

169. We note particularly, while upon the ice, that the 26th stake,

like the 10th stake in our last line, stands much nearer to the

eastern than to the western side of the glacier; the measurements,

therefore, offer a further proof that the centre of this portion of

the glacier is not the place of swiftest motion.

§ 23. _Unequal Motion of the two Sides of the Mer de Glace._

170. But in neither the first line nor the second were we able to

push our measurements quite across the glacier. Why? In attempting

to do one thing we are often taught another, and thus in science, if

we are only steadfast in our work, our very defeats are converted

into means of instruction. We at first planted our theodolite on the

lateral moraine of the Mer de Glace, expecting to be able to command

the glacier from side to side. But we are now undeceived; the centre

of the glacier proves to be higher than its sides, and from our last

two positions the view of the ice near the opposite side of the

glacier was intercepted by the elevation at the centre. The mountain

slopes, in fact, are warm in summer, and they melt the ice nearest to

them, thus causing a fall from the centre to the sides.

171. But yonder on the heights at the other side of the glacier we

see a likely place for our theodolite. We cross the glacier and plant

our instrument in a position from which we sweep the glacier from

side to side. Our first line was below the Montanvert, our second

line above it; this third line is exactly opposite the Montanvert;

in fact, the mark on which we have fixed the fibre-cross of the

theodolite is a corner of one of the windows of the little inn. Along

this line we fix twelve stakes on July 20. On the 21st one of them

had fallen; but the velocities of the remaining eleven in 24 hours

were found to be as follows:--

Third Line: C C' upon the Sketch.

East West

Stake 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Inches 20 23 29 30 34 28 25 25 25 18 9

172. Both the first stake and the eleventh in this series stood

near the sides of the glacier. On the eastern side the motion is

20 inches, while on the western side it is only 9. It rises on

the eastern side from 20 to 34 inches at the 5th stake, which we,

standing upon the glacier, can see to be much nearer to the eastern

than to the western side. _The united evidence of these three lines

places the fact beyond doubt, that opposite the Montanvert, and for

some distance above it and below it, the whole eastern side of the

glacier is moving more quickly than the western side._

§ 24. _Suggestion of a new Likeness of Glacier Motion to River

Motion. Conjecture tested._

173. Here we have cause for reflection, and facts are comparatively

worthless if they do not provoke this exercise of the mind. It

is because facts of nature are not isolated but connected, that

science, to follow them, must also form a connected whole. The mind

of the natural philosopher must, as it were, be a web of _thought_

corresponding in all its fibres with the web of _fact_ in nature.

174. Let us, then, ascend to a point which commands a good view

of this portion of the Mer de Glace. The ice-river we see is not

straight but curved, and its curvature is _from_ the Montanvert;

that is to say, its convex side is east, and its concave side is

west (look to the sketch). You have already pondered the fact that a

glacier, _in some respects_, moves like a river. How would a river

move through a curved channel? This is known. Were the ice of the

Mer de Glace displaced by water, the point of swiftest motion at the

Montanvert would not be the centre, but a point east of the centre.

Can it be then that this "water-rock," as ice is sometimes called,

acts in this respect also like water?

175. This is a thought suggested on the spot; it may or it may not

be true, but the means of testing it are at hand. Looking up the

glacier, we see that at _les Ponts_ it also bends, but that there

its convex curvature is towards the western side of the valley (look

again to the sketch). If our surmise be true, the point of swiftest

motion opposite _les Ponts_ ought to lie west of the axis of the

glacier.

176. Let us test this conjecture. On July 25 we fix in a line across

this portion of the glacier seventeen stakes; every one of them has

remained firm, and on the 26th we find the motion for 24 hours to be

as follows:--

Fourth Line: D D' upon the Sketch.

East West

Stake 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Inches 7 8 13 15 16 19 20 21 21 23 23 21 22 17 15

177. Inspected by the naked eye alone, the stakes 10 and 11, where

the glacier reaches its greatest motion, are seen to be considerably

to the west of the axis of the glacier. Thus far we have a perfect

verification of the _guess_ which prompted us to make these

measurements. You will here observe that the "guesses" of science are

not the work of chance, but of thoughtful pondering over antecedent

facts. The guess is the "induction" facts, to be ratified or exploded

by the test of subsequent experiment.

178. And though even now we have exceedingly strong reason for

holding that the point of maximum velocity obeys the law of liquid

motion, the strength of our conclusion will be doubled if we can

show that the point shifts back to the eastern side of the axis at

another place of flexure. Fortunately such a place exists opposite

Trélaporte. Here the convex curvature of the valley turns again to

the east. Across this portion of the glacier a line was set out on

July 28, and from measurements on the 31st, the rate of motion per 24

hours was determined.

Fifth Line: E E' upon the Sketch.

West East

Stake 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Inches 11 14 13 15 15 16 17 19 20 19 20 18 16 15 10

179. Here, again, the mere estimate of distances by the eye would

show us that the three stakes which moved fastest, viz. the 9th,

10th, and 11th, were all to the east of the middle line of the

glacier. The demonstration that the point of swiftest motion wanders

to and fro across the axis, as the flexure of the valley changes, is,

therefore,--shall I say complete?

180. Not yet. For if surer means are open to us we must not rest

content with estimates by the eye. We have with us a surveying chain:

let us shake it out and measure these lines, noting the distance of

every stake from the side of the glacier. This is no easy work among

the crevasses, but I confide it confidently to Mr. Hirst and you.

We can afterwards compare a number of stakes on the eastern side

with the same number of stakes taken at the same distances from the

western side. For example, a pair of stakes, one ten yards from the

eastern side and the other ten yards from the western side; another

pair, one fifty yards from the eastern side and the other fifty yards

from the western side, and so on, can be compared together. For the

sake of easy reference, let us call the points thus compared in

pairs, _equivalent points_.

181. There were five pairs of such points upon our fourth line, D D',

and here are their velocities:

Eastern points; motion in inches 13 15 16 18 20

Western " " " " 15 17 22 23 23

In every case here the stake at the western side moved more rapidly

than the equivalent stake at the eastern side.

182. Applying the same analysis to our fifth line, E E', we have the

following series of velocities of three pairs of equivalent points:--

Eastern points; motion in inches 15 18 19

Western " " " " 13 15 17

183. Here the three points on the eastern side move more rapidly than

the equivalent points on the western side.

184. It is thus proved:--

1. _That opposite the Montanvert the eastern half of the Mer de Glace

moves more rapidly than the western half._

2. _That opposite_ les Fonts _the western half of the glacier moves

more rapidly than the eastern half._

3. _That opposite Trélaporte the eastern half of the glacier again

moves more rapidly than the western half._

4. _That these changes in the place of greatest motion are determined

by the flexures of the valley through which the Mer de Glace moves._

§ 25. _New Law of Glacier Motion._

185. Let us express these facts in another way. Supposing the points

of swiftest motion for a very great number of lines crossing the

Mer de Glace to be determined; the line joining all those points

together is what mathematicians would call the _locus_ of the point

of swiftest motion.

186. At Trélaporte this line would lie east of the centre; at the

_Ponts_ it would lie west of the centre; hence in passing from

Trélaporte to the _Ponts_ it would cross the centre. But at the

Montanvert it would again lie east of the centre; hence between the

_Ponts_ and the Montanvert the centre must be crossed a second time.

If there were further sinuosities upon the Mer de Glace there would

be further crossings of the axis of the glacier.

187. The points on the axis which mark the transition from eastern to

western bending, and the reverse, may be called _points of contrary

flexure_.

188. Now what is true of the Mer de Glace is true of all other

glaciers moving through sinuous valleys; so that the facts

established in the Mer de Glace may be expanded into the following

general law of glacier motion:--

_When a glacier moves through a sinuous valley, the locus of the

points of maximum motion does not coincide with the centre of the

glacier, but, on the contrary, always lies on the convex side of

the central line. The locus is therefore a curved line more deeply

sinuous than the valley itself, and crosses the axis of the glacier

at each point of contrary flexure._

189. The dotted line on the Outline Plan (page 68) represents the

locus of the point of maximum motion, the firm line marking the

centre of the glacier.

190. Substituting the word _river_ for _glacier_, this law is

also true. The motion of the water is ruled by precisely the same

conditions as the motion of the ice.

191. Let us now apply our law to the explanation of a difficulty.

Turning to the careful measurements executed by M. Agassiz on

the glacier of the Unteraar, we notice in the discussion of these

measurements a section of the "Système glaciaire" devoted to the

"Migrations of the Centre." It is here shown that the middle of the

Unteraar glacier is not always the point of swiftest motion. This

fact has hitherto remained without explanation; but a glance at the

Unteraar valley, or at the map of the valley, shows the enigma to be

an illustration of the law which we have just established on the Mer

de Glace.

§ 26. _Motion of Axis of Mer de Glace._

192. We have now measured the rate of motion of five different lines

across the trunk of the Mer de Glace. Do they all move alike? No.

Like a river, a glacier at different places moves at different rates.

Comparing together the points of maximum motion of all five lines, we

have this result:

MOTION OF MER DE GLACE.

At Trélaporte 20 inches a day.

At _les Ponts_ 23 " "

Above the Montanvert 26 " "

At the Montanvert 34 " "

Below the Montanvert 33[C] " "

[C] This is probably under the mark. I think it likely that the

swiftest motion of this portion of the Mer de Glace in 1857 amounted

to a yard in twenty-four hours.

193. There is thus an increase of rapidity as we descend the glacier

from Trélaporte to the Montanvert; the maximum, motion at the

Montanvert being fourteen inches a day greater than at Trélaporte.

§ 27. _Motion of Tributary Glaciers._

194. So much for the trunk glacier; let us now investigate the

branches, permitting, as we have hitherto done, reflection on known

facts to precede our attempts to discover unknown ones.

195. As we stood upon our "cleft station," whence we had so capital

a view of the Mer de Glace, we were struck by the fact that some of

the tributaries of the glacier were wider than the glacier itself.

Supposing water to be substituted for the ice, how do you suppose

it would behave? You would doubtless conclude that the motion down

the broad and slightly-inclined valleys of the Géant and the Léchaud

would be comparatively slow, but that the water would force itself

with increased rapidity through the "narrows" of Trélaporte. Let us

test this notion as applied to the ice.

196. Planting our theodolite in the shadow of Mont Tacul, and

choosing a suitable point at the opposite side of the Glacier du

Géant, we fix on July 29 a series of ten stakes across the glacier.

The motion of this line in twenty-four hours was as follows:--

MOTION OF GLACIER DU GÉANT.

Sixth Line: H H' upon Sketch.

Stake 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Inches 11 10 12 13 12 13 11 10 9 5

197. Our conjecture is fully verified. The maximum motion here is

seven inches a day less than that of the Mer de Glace at Trélaporte

(192).

198. And now for the Léchaud branch. On August 1 we fix ten stakes

across this glacier above the point where it is joined by the

Talèfre. Measured on August 3, and reduced to twenty-four hours, the

motion was found to be--

MOTION OF GLACIER DE LÉCHAUD.

The Forms of Water in Clouds and Rivers, Ice and Glaciers · 第 4 / 11 段