CHAPTER I.

Produced by Avinash Kothare, Tom Allen, Juliet Sutherland, Charles Franks

and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.

PERSONAL EXPERIENCE OF A PHYSICIAN,

WITH

AN APPEAL TO THE MEDICAL AND CLERICAL PROFESSIONS;

AND

AN APPENDIX,

A REVIEW OF "CHRIST AND THE TEMPERANCE QUESTION"

IN THE CHRISTIAN UNION.

BY

JOHN ELLIS, M.D.

CONTENTS.

CHAPTER I.

PERSONAL MEDICAL EXPERIENCE OK A PHYSICIAN.

CHAPTER II.

WHY EVERY PHYSICIAN SHOULD EXAMINE HOMOEOPATHY.

CHAPTER III.

DANGERS THAT RESULT FROM THE ALLOPATHIC TREATMENT OF DISEASES.

CHAPTER IV.

PERSONAL RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE OF A PHYSICIAN.

CHAPTER V.

THE DAWN OF A NEW DISPENSATION.

CHAPTER VI.

A NEW DAY TO OUR EARTH.

CHAPTER VII.

THE WANTS OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH.

CHAPTER VIII.

RESTRAINING AND CURING SPIRITUAL AND NATURAL DISEASES.

CHAPTER IX.

PERSONAL EXPERIENCE CONTINUED AND EFFORTS.

CHAPTER X.

FINAL APPEAL TO THE CLERGY.

ADDENDUM.

A REVIEW OF "CHRIST AND THE TEMPERANCE QUESTION,"

IN THE "CHRISTIAN UNION."

PERSONAL EXPERIENCE OF A PHYSICIAN.

CHAPTER I.

We all admit that every one who attempts to act as a physician, should

strive to qualify himself, or herself, for the work by obtaining the best

education which our medical schools afford; for to physicians are

intrusted, not simply the property or money, but the very lives of their

fellow-citizens. As the responsibility is great, so the duty of preparing

one's self before commencing practice, and of keeping fully abreast of all

new and valuable discoveries in the art of healing, is equally great. A

physician should not be led blindly by his teachers and prominent medical

writers, and so strongly confirm himself in the theories and views which

they proclaim that he cannot, without prejudice, examine new views and

theories with due care. It has been said that when Harvey discovered the

true course of the circulation of the blood, there was not a single

professor in the medical colleges of England over fifty years of age, who

ever believed "the heresy," as his discovery was called. However this may

have been, it is certain that professors and prominent medical writers are

not always the first to see and recognize the truth, even when it is

clearly presented to their notice.

A native of western Massachusetts, I studied medicine with an intelligent

and worthy physician in my native town, and attended two and one-half

courses of medical lectures at the Berkshire Medical College, at

Pittsfield, Mass., and graduated in 1841; and during the following winter I

attended the Medical College at Albany, N. Y., devoting a large portion of

my time to dissecting. After finishing at Albany, I visited various places

in western and central Massachusetts, and operated on eyes for strabismus

or cross-eyes,--an operation which had then been recently introduced for

that deformity; after which I settled at Chesterfield (Mass.), and

commenced practicing medicine, where I remained about one year.

One day I visited Northampton, and, calling on a physician with whom I was

acquainted, I found upon his table a homoeopathic book. "Why," I exclaimed

with astonishment, "you are not studying homoeopathy, are you?" "Yes," he

replied, "I am studying it, and trying the remedies cautiously;" and he

went on to describe cases which he had treated satisfactorily by the use of

the remedies, and among them a case of pleurisy and one of intermittent

fever, and he wound up by saying: "Now, if you will go down the street to a

book-store and purchase 'Hull's Jahr,' in two volumes, I will give you half

a dozen homoeopathic remedies, and you can try them for yourself."

Here was a dilemma. Never until that hour had I ever heard homoeopathy

spoken of, by either a medical professor or one of my professional

brethren, except with contempt and ridicule. "But," I said to myself, "if

there is any truth in homoeopathy I ought to know it, and I cannot treat

this physician's testimony with contempt; and it is a duty which I owe to

my fellow-men, and especially to my patients, to investigate the new system

carefully." I immediately went and purchased the books, and he give me six

bottles of medicine, and I took them back with me to Chesterfield. I

remember making but one Homoeopathic prescription before leaving

Chesterfield, and that was for a case of uterine hemorrhage, which I had

treated unsuccessfully for some time with allopathic remedies. I looked

over my Homoeopathic books carefully and found that China (cinchona) was

indicated. As that remedy was not among the bottles of medicated pellets

which my medical friend had given me, I directed that one drop of the

ordinary tincture of Peruvian bark should be dropped into a glass of water,

and that, after stirring it well, one teaspoonful of the solution thus made

should be given three or four times a day. The patient commenced improving

immediately, and was soon well.

Soon after that I removed to Grand Rapids, Michigan, and commenced anew the

practice of medicine. I then had neither the knowledge nor the faith in

homoeopathy which I thought would justify me in treating any serious case

of disease with homoeopathic remedies; but I did not neglect to study the

new books. One day, a friend of my younger days, who was residing at Grand

Haven, came into my office and said that he had been suffering from the

toothache for several days, and that he did not like to have the tooth

extracted, and he wanted to know if I could do anything for it without

extracting it. I told him that I had recently obtained some homoeopathic

books and remedies, and that I had noticed that remedies were spoken of for

toothache. So I looked over my books and selected Belladonna as the remedy

suitable in his case, and gave him a dose of it and other doses to take

with him if he needed them. We talked in the office for a short time, and

then we walked up to the hotel where he was stopping; as we entered, he

stood still a moment and remarked: "Well, my tooth does not ache as

severely as it did." I saw him weeks afterward, and he told me that he had

not had the toothache from the hour he took the medicine.

Away in that new place, then a village of about one thousand inhabitants,

with no homoeopathic physician within a hundred miles of me, I commenced

cautiously the use of the new remedies; first in mild cases of disease, and

in cases where Allopathic treatment failed to produce the desired effect.

Among the first of the serious cases where I used the remedies was a case

of pneumonia. A young man had been very sick with that disease for many

days. I had resorted vigorously to the antiphlogistic treatment then in

vogue; a consulting physician was called, and at last we told the family

that our patient could not live until the next morning. I then said to the

consulting physician: "I have some homoeopathic remedies; suppose we try

them?" His reply was: "It does not make any difference what you try; he

will not live until morning." Under such circumstances I felt that I was

justified in trying the new remedies. I accordingly dissolved a few pellets

of Aconite in a glass of water, and of Bryonia alb. in another glass of

water, and directed that a teaspoonful of the solution of Aconite should be

given once an hour for five hours, and that a similar dose of Bryonia be

given instead of Aconite every sixth hour. I sat down by his bedside and

watched his case for two hours. At the end of that period I found that his

pulse was five beats less frequent in a minute, and that his breathing was

a little easier. The next morning all of his dangerous symptoms had

disappeared, and in a reasonable period of time he was restored to health.

I talked with the consulting physician about his unexpected recovery, and

we were, disposed to think that we had made a false prognosis, and that he

would have recovered any way. Still, the case made some impression on me;

so that in the next case of pneumonia to which I was called, I resolved to

try the same remedies in the same way. The patient was a man about forty

years of age. Under the action of the Aconite and Bryonia the patient about

held his own, neither gaining nor losing very perceptibly for about three

days. At the end of that period I became alarmed, and felt that if the

patient were to die I should be guilty of the crime of manslaughter. I

discontinued the treatment, and resorted to the then regular antiphlogistic

treatment; the patient immediately began to get worse, and at the end of

three days more he was a very sick man. I then came to the conclusion that

my patient had done much better under the homoeopathic treatment than he

had under the Allopathic, and I discontinued the latter and returned to the

former, giving the Aconite and Bryonia. The patient ceased to grow worse;

he held his own for two or three days, then he began to improve, and was

soon restored to health. From that day to this I have never bled a patient

suffering from either pneumonia or pleurisy, neither have I applied a

blister, or given a cathartic, or an Allopathic dose of tartar emetic, or

an opiate, or any form of alcoholic or fermented drinks, either during the

continuance of the above-named diseases or during convalescence; nor have I

ever regretted, in a single instance, not having done so.

During the fall of the year we had many cases of dysentery which were very

obstinate, continuing one or two weeks or longer, attended by a fever

approaching a typhoid character. I found the Allopathic treatment

unsatisfactory, as there were quite a number of deaths. So I consulted my

homoeopathic books and concluded to try the remedies; but at that time I

had only the six carefully prepared remedies given me by the physician in

Northampton, and I found that I needed some other remedies; so for

Arsenicum I used a drop of Fowler's solution of arsenic in a glassful of

water, giving a teaspoonful of the solution thus prepared for a dose, and I

also used the tincture of Colocynth and other remedies in the same manner.

Even with the help of such crude remedies I found that I could generally

control the disease far more speedily and with greater certainty and safety

than by Allopathic treatment.

I was called to attend a young man who, while stooping over to set a trap

in the woods, was mistaken for a bear by a comrade who was hunting with

him, and shot through the neck. To restrain secondary hemorrhage I was

obliged, in order to save the life of my patient, to ligature both carotid

arteries at the interval of only four and one-half days, which, at that

time, had never been done successfully at an interval of less than twelve

months between the operations. My patient did not suffer from head

symptoms, as I was fearful he would, but his lungs became seriously

congested. I resorted to the Allopathic treatment without affording any

relief; and, as he was steadily getting worse, I consulted my homoeopathic

works and gave him Aconite, a drop of the tincture in a glass of water; of

the solution thus made I directed a teaspoonful to be given every hour;

this gave prompt relief to the active symptoms of congestion. For a cough

which remained I gave a few doses of belladonna prepared in the same

manner, and all of the symptoms soon disappeared. I reported this case to

the New York Journal of Medicine, and it was transferred, even to the

homoeopathic prescriptions, to the American edition of Velpeau's great work

on surgery.

I found when I went to Grand Rapids that the intermittent, remittent, and

pernicious fevers, which prevailed in that place and in the surrounding

country, were generally treated by the resident physicians with mercurial

or other cathartic remedies, followed or accompanied by Quinine and brandy

or fermented drinks containing Alcohol, and opiates where they were

supposed to be necessary. As I began to look into homoeopathy, I first

prescribed Ipecac for the vomiting which sometimes attended these fevers,

one drop of the tincture in a glass of water, and giving a teaspoonful from

the glass for a dose. For watery diarrhoeas I gave Fowler's solution of

Arsenic in the same manner, and in both instances generally with very

satisfactory results. As my confidence in the homoeopathic treatment of

diseases increased, I sent to New York and obtained an assortment of the

remedies and more books, and was then much better prepared to prescribe

successfully. I soon found that by their use I could dispense with

cathartic remedies and thus avoid the danger of causing a medicinal

irritation of the bowels, which it is sometimes difficult to control. I

also found that I could do much better without Alcohol in any form, in the

treatment of these fevers, than with it; and I soon ceased to use brandy,

wine, beer, etc.

As to Quinine, that remedy will unquestionably interrupt the paroxysms of

intermittent and remittent fevers promptly if it is given at the proper

time and in suitable doses; and, if the attack is the first the patient has

ever had, a return of the disease may at least sometimes be prevented by

giving once a week in two or three doses, at an interval of twelve hours,

about the quantity which would be required to interrupt the disease in the

first instance. These doses should be given the day before the disease is

expected to return. I found it much better to give about two large doses of

quinine than to give the same quantity in 1 or 2 grain doses. I reported

the results of my experiments and observations in the use of Quinine at

Grand Rapids to the _New York Journal of Medicine_ (allopathic). In

all instances where life is in danger from a return of a paroxysm of

intermittent or remittent fever, the patient can be rescued from immediate

danger by giving Quinine in doses sufficient to prevent a return of the

paroxysm. In all other cases, and perhaps even in such, we can rely safely

on homoeopathic remedies in minute doses. Quinine in Allopathic doses will

rarely cure the disease, excepting, it may be, as named above, in a first

attack. If the patient has ever had more than one or two attacks, it is

almost sure to return again and again for two seasons, complicated with

symptoms caused by the remedy, in spite of Allopathic doses of quinine;

whereas by treating the patient homoeopathically, except in old cases, you

will not suddenly interrupt the paroxysms, for they may continue one or two

weeks, or even a few days longer, but when they cease there is generally

the end of the disease, and the patient speedily regains his ordinary state

of health instead of lingering along with frequent returns of the disease

for generally two seasons, as he does when quinine is used. Old cases of

intermittent fever are frequently cured promptly by infinitesimal doses of

homoeopathic remedies. I have never seen Allopathic doses of Quinine do any

good in typhoid fevers. And, as to the use of cathartics, from my

observation I soon became satisfied that a vast number of lives have been

lost by their use in cases of remittent and typhoid fevers, the tendency to

irritation of the mucous membrane, which exists especially in the latter

disease, being often fatally aggravated by cathartic remedies.

I found the prejudice so strong against homoeopathy when I commenced my

investigations, that I generally said nothing about the kind of remedies I

was using, and sometimes disguised the remedies by mixing with sugar or

pulverized liquorice root, or by mixing or dissolving them in water.

I have given the above details to show how carefully and patiently, step by

step, I commenced my investigations, and watched the action of remedies

when given in accordance with the Homoeopathic law of cure, and compared

the results with the results which followed the use of Allopathic remedies.

I remained at Grand Rapids two years. During that period I gradually

substituted the Homoeopathic treatment of diseases for the Allopathic, as

fast as I found I could cure the various diseases which came under my

observation with more safety and certainty by the former method of

treatment than by the latter.

Now I ask the intelligent, conscientious, and philanthropic reader, Did I

do right or did I do wrong in thus investigating homoeopathy and using

cautiously the remedies for the cure of the sick, as I found them more

efficacious and safe than the remedies which I had been taught to use and

had used previously? If it was my duty to thus critically examine the new

method of treatment, when my attention was seriously called to it, and to

cautiously try the remedies on the sick, is it not clearly the duty of

every Allopathic physician in our land to do the same? To thus earnestly

call the attention of physicians of every school to the importance of

investigating homoeopathy, and carefully using the remedies for the cure of

the sick, and to entreat them not to stop and be satisfied with crude

doses, such as drop doses of tinctures and the first, second or third

dilutions or triturations of remedies, as some have done, is my sole object

in writing these pages. The most decided and satisfactory cures which I

have ever witnessed have been effected by the thirtieth and two hundredth

dilutions. But, according to my experience, it is not well to confine one's

self absolutely to either high or low dilutions, as some have done; but if

you are satisfied that you have selected the right remedy, instead of

changing the remedy when you do not see relief from its use, change the

dilution from low to high or high to low, as the case may be. I could

detail many cases to show the importance of doing this. No physician should

labor specially to sustain either a theory or preconceived ideas, but to

cure his patients promptly. The health and lives of our fellow-beings are

too important to be trifled with.

During the early years of my practice of homoeopathy I was called to see a

young man recently attacked with "epileptic fits." As he was going

immediately to New York, with his sister, I advised them to call on the

late Dr. John F. Gray, with whom I became acquainted during my first visit

to New York. On reaching New York they called on Dr. Gray, and the young

man remained under his treatment for several weeks. Of Dr. Gray's treatment

of this patient, so far as remedies were concerned, I know only of a single

remedy which he gave, which was Nitrate of silver, which I understood was

given in a somewhat crude form, and not even in a low centesimal dilution.

The young man, finding little or no benefit from the treatment, went to his

home in Georgia, after which I received a letter stating that he had not

been essentially benefited by Dr. Gray's treatment, and requesting me to

prescribe for him. In response I sent him the 30th dilution of Nux vomica,

which he took and soon recovered from the disease, and never had any return

of the paroxysms. Dr. Gray was a low dilutionist.

On the other hand, during my second or third visit to New York I called on

Dr. Edward Bayard, who was a high dilutionist. I found him in poor health.

He had been suffering, as he told me, for some time from a subacute

irritation of the mucous membrane of the bowels, with loose passages, and

some febrile excitement. He asked me to prescribe for him. After a careful

inquiry as to existing symptoms I said to him, "Mercurius vivus ought to

cure you." He replied that he had taken it repeatedly without the slightest

effect. I asked him what dilution of this remedy he had taken. He replied

that he had taken the 30th and 200th dilutions. I suggested that he should

take the 3d trituration. "Why," he exclaimed, "I have not prescribed the 3d

trituration of mercury for many years, and I do not know as I have any in

my office." But, on looking around, he found a bottle of the second

centesimal trituration; and I said to him: "That will answer. You can take

a dose of that now [which he did] and repeat it three or four times between

now and to-morrow night, after which take a dose of the 30th or 200th

dilution of sulphur." The next time I saw him he told me that my

prescription cured him promptly.

That the careful treatment of diseases by the use of low dilutions of

Homoeopathic remedies, when compared with the Allopathic treatment, is

wonderfully successful I well know; for it was by the success which

attended the use of the low dilutions that I was led into the new practice,

as thousands of other graduates of allopathic colleges have been. Still, I

know very well by experience that the low dilutionists, in a very large

number of cases, fail to cure patients promptly, and in many cases fail to

cure them at all when they could cure them promptly by the use of the high

dilutions, often by the very same remedy which they have been using. I was

called to see a patient suffering from puerperal anaemia, with "nursing

sore mouth." She was greatly exhausted; her stomach, which was very acid,

would retain very little nourishment. She had been under Allopathic

treatment for some time without experiencing any relief. I gave her a low

dilution of Pulsatilla, which afforded her no relief. Then I selected other

remedies, from which she derived no benefit. After that I gave her the

200th dilution of Pulsatilla, the first dose of which produced, as she

declared, a change for the better within an hour, and she rapidly recovered

under its use. A lady who had for two winters been sent to Florida by her

Allopathic physician for a severe cough, attended by the physical signs of

induration of the summit of one of her lungs, called on me early in the

fall, saying that her physician advised her to go again to Florida, but

that she did not like to go, and wanted me to prescribe for her. After

examining her symptoms carefully I gave her a single dose of Sulphur, 200th

dilution; at the end of a week she was better, at the end of another week

much better, and at the end of the third week she had but few symptoms

remaining, for which I gave only one dose of Arsenicum, 200th, which

completed the cure.

Having practiced medicine for two years at Grand Rapids, I spent a winter

East and visited New York, making the Acquaintance of Homoeopathic

physicians, and conversing with them about the new system of treating

disease, attending medical lectures and clinics at the two Allopathic

colleges. I remember very well attending a clinic at the College of

Physicians and Surgeons, held by the late Prof. Willard Parker, when a

little child was brought in suffering from whooping cough. Prof. Parker,

looking around upon the students, said: "Here, gentlemen, is a case of

disease which, like the small-pox, measles, and scarlet fever, runs a

definite course; if you will let the patients alone they will generally get

well, but if you commence dosing them you will often bring on complications

and they will die." This statement, coming from a medical man of his

prominence, surely was worthy of consideration.

After spending the winter at the East I went to Detroit, Mich., and opened

an office in connection with Dr. P. M. Wheaton. I practiced in Detroit for

fifteen years, excepting that during the last six years of that time I

spent a part of each year at Cleveland, giving a course of lectures on the

Theory and Practice of Medicine at the Western Homoeopathic Medical

College, of Cleveland, Ohio.

When I went to Detroit the prejudice against homoeopathy was very strong,

especially among physicians. An attempt was made to pass a bill through the

Legislature of Michigan which would virtually prohibit the practice in the

State. The bill passed the Senate, but, owing to the prompt action of the

friends of homoeopathy in exposing the design of the advocates of the bill,

it was defeated in the House of Representatives. The presence of the

Asiatic cholera in 1849 in the city, and the success which attended the

homoeopathic treatment of that disease, was instrumental in calling the

attention of large numbers of the most intelligent and influential citizens

to the new practice and establishing it upon a firm basis. When the disease

first appeared in the city, we furnished the families which we were

accustomed to attend, and all others who desired them, with Veratrum album

and Cuprum metallicum, which had been earnestly recommended by Homoeopathic

physicians elsewhere, who had had experience in treating the disease, as

preventive remedies, a dose or two of each to be taken daily. As a result,

very few among the families which we were accustomed to attend were

attacked with the disease, and in such cases as occurred the disease was

generally readily controlled. As a rule, the most troublesome cases which

we had to treat were those in which Opium or morphine in some form had been

administered before we were called. In such cases it was exceedingly

difficult to get a satisfactory response from our remedies, however

carefully we selected them.

The Asiatic cholera is a violent disease and rapid in its progress, and if

severe cases of this disease are to be treated successfully, it must be by

remedies which are prompt in their action. It is here that homoeopathic

remedies show their superiority over all other remedies or methods of

treatment, for they act upon the diseased organs in the direction of the

disease, and thus excite a prompt reaction. Homoeopathic remedies, when

properly used, do not benumb, nor do they seriously aggravate existing

diseased action; and they neither cause diseased action in well organs, nor

reduce the quantity of blood, nor lessen the vitality of the organism and

the ability to react against the encroachment of diseased action, as does

the allopathic treatment; and, consequently, if a patient dies the

physician and his friends have the consolation, at least, of knowing that

he did not die from the treatment.

I well remember, while practicing in Detroit, attending a prominent

citizen, a lawyer, who had a severe attack of pneumonia; and, while

recovering from it, he went one night into a cold room to sleep, and this

brought on a relapse which involved both lungs, and my patient became very

sick. One day on visiting him I found an Allopathic physician sitting by

his bedside. I was told that he simply called as a friend. As I entered he

arose and walked out into the hall. I followed him, and asked him what he

thought of my patient. He replied very promptly: "He will die! he will die,

sir!! He ought to have been bled, blistered, and physicked long ago, but it

is too late now." I replied: "He will not die, sir, for the very reason

that he has not had the treatment you name; he has his blood and vital

energies, unimpaired by the treatment, to sustain him." And he did not die,

but recovered, and was appointed Governor of one of the Western Territories

long after that.

After having practiced medicine for fifteen years, except the months I was

absent at Cleveland the last six years of the time, I was invited to fill

the chair of Theory and Practice in the New York Homoeopathic Medical

College. This invitation I accepted, and removed to New York and took up my

residence there, and commenced practice again in a new field. About the

year 1868 I invented a new process for refining petroleum by the aid of

superheated steam, and spent eighteen months in developing the process at

Binghamton, N. Y., and then returned to my practice in New York City. In

the year 1873 I gave up the practice of medicine, and in connection with

two gentlemen who were interested in selling oils, I commenced the refining

of petroleum, manufacturing therefrom machinery and other oils; to which

business I have devoted my attention ever since. I have attended chiefly to

the manufacturing department and my partners to the selling.

I have been frequently asked: "Why did you quit the practice of medicine?

Was not that a useful business?" Yes, it was; but I had come to feel that

there were fields for greater usefulness--in fact, that it was vastly more

important to teach people the laws of health and life, and to strive to

lead them by precept and example to shun the causes of disease, than it was

to cure them when they were sick--that prevention was better than cure.

Consequently, when I saw before me a reasonably sure prospect of being able

to make a good deal more money at the refining business than I could ever

expect to make in the practice of medicine, I could but feel that, by the

aid of a reasonable portion of the money thus made, I could perform a far

greater use than I could by practicing medicine. This, then, was the reason

for my giving up a good and useful profession and practice for my present

business. What I have attempted to do for the benefit of suffering humanity

since I gave up the practice of medicine, I will name in a future chapter.