Dr. Stebbing, in his Sermon on the New Birth, sneeringly observes:--

"Mr. Whitefield, who had his orders among us, and still

professes himself a member of the Church of England, tells us

of some conversations he had with Quakers, in his journeyings.

It seems they could not agree about the use of the sacraments

and the payment of tithes; but, says he, 'I think their notions

about walking and being led by the Spirit are right and good.'

The young man, you perceive, is in a very hopeful way! He is a

Quaker already in the first and leading principle of that sect;

and, as to his scruples about tithes, etc., they may _abate_ as

he grows better acquainted with his associates."

In "the Life of Whitefield, by an Impartial Hand," the young

preacher is accused, by the Rev. J. Tucker, of "propagating

blasphemous and enthusiastical notions." Mr. Tucker dolorously

adds:--

"Some of Mr. Whitefield's followers have insulted and reviled

me in passing along the streets; and declared that they looked

upon me as the enemy of God and His religion. This was owing to

Mr. Whitefield's pointing at me so often in his prayers, and

describing me in his harangues to the populace." Mr. Tucker

further relates, that, "to gain credit with the populace,

Whitefield often had in his mouth at Bristol this dreadful

imprecation, 'If what I say be not strictly true, may all that

ever heard me, may you that now hear me, and all that shall hear

me hereafter, rise up in judgment against me, and rejoice at my

_damnation_!'"

Mr. Wilder, in his Sermon "preached before the University of Oxford,

August 5, 1739," abounds in abusive epithets, which need not be

quoted; but two or three extracts will be useful as displaying the

fiery, fuming spirit of this university preacher; and the animosity

with which Whitefield was regarded.

"I cannot dismiss this point, without taking notice of the

indecent, false, unchristian reflections cast on the clergy of

our Church, charging them with popery and perjury, than which

nothing is more unjust, except the cruel mercies of those,

who pass sentence of damnation upon all who have not the same

spiritual pride, vanity, and enthusiasm as themselves."

"He" (Whitefield) "is but a young son of the prophets, yet,

if we will take his word for it, he is as much inspired, and

felt the Holy Ghost at imposition of hands, as much as Elisha

did, when Elijah dropped his mantle. Nay, he has the modesty to

compare himself, in his labours and afflictions, with the great

apostle of the Gentiles, and even with the Son of God Himself."

"Let us hear what this inspired man saith of the new birth. We

find, from his writings, that the new birth is a conversion and

change wrought in the mind of a man, by a sensible operation of

the Spirit of God; and that those who have not experienced some

such sensible change, in their hearts, are not born again, nor

in a state of salvation. If this be true, how few of all the

millions of the professors of Christianity are there, that have

been, or will be saved! Scarce any but the itinerant preacher,

a few of his followers, and some Quakers. If this doctrine be

true, how is the God of all mercy and goodness, the God of love,

comfort, and joy, turned into a cruel and tyrannical being, that

delights not to save, but to destroy mankind!"

"That they" (the Methodists) "teach doctrines inconsistent with,

and destructive of Christianity, appears from their encouraging

religious exercises, to the neglect of other Christian duties.

How many, while they run gaping after the spiritual food which

these rambling teachers pretend to distribute to them from

heaven, leave their business at random, and their families to

want the necessary food of this life; not considering that it is

their duty to attend, at the appointed seasons, on the services

and ordinances of God, under their proper pastors, not in

highways, in fields, or commons, but in those places which are

set apart for, and dedicated to, God's honour and worship."

"His" (Whitefield's) "boasting of the Lord's assisting him to

lift up his voice like a trumpet, makes me believe, that, rather

than return to a sober mind, and leave the field, to preach

sound doctrine in our churches, he is resolved to make his voice

the trumpet of war; and reduce, if possible, this Church and

State to anarchy and confusion: as it was effected once in the

last century, when by a successful rebellion begun, fomented,

and carried on, by the like spiritual enthusiasts, the life

of the best of kings was barbarously taken away; the best of

monarchies changed into a democracy; and this truly apostolical

Church wounded, mangled, and, by papists and puritans,

crucified, like our Saviour, between two thieves."

Such are fair specimens of the sermon which Mr. Wilder[250]

"preached before the University of Oxford." Young Whitefield was far

from perfect; and, certainly, the same may be said respecting his

rebukers.

[250] Rector of St. Aldates.

The Rev. Charles Wheatley, in St. Paul's Cathedral, London, was less

violent in his language than Mr. Wilder; but, in foot-notes, gives

unguarded extracts from Whitefield's Journals, and exclaims, "Was

there ever such a medley of vanity, and nonsense, and blasphemy

jumbled together?" In his sermon, also, he speaks of the Methodists,

as "assuming to themselves, upon all occasions, the peculiar

language of the Holy Ghost; equalling themselves, in everything they

do, to prophets and apostles; and boasting of immediate inspirations

and extraordinary communications with God; and, in proof of it,

laying a blasphemous claim to greater miracles than ever were

performed by our blessed Saviour Himself." Mr. Wheatley's sermon and

foot-notes were almost altogether levelled against Whitefield.

The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 93 / 162 题