On the same occasion, Charles Wesley wrote:--

"1740, October 28. I was exceedingly shocked with the news of

Mr. Seward's death; but he is taken from the evil; rescued out

of the hands of wicked men."

This is a long account of Seward and his brothers; but their names

have always been so prominent in the early career of Whitefield and

the Wesleys, that the writer hopes to be forgiven for collecting

the hitherto scattered scraps of information concerning them, and

presenting that information in a connected form.

After William Seward's death, his brothers are never mentioned in

Methodistic annals.

The account of Howell Harris shall be shorter. It is taken from a

document written by himself. This memorable Welshman was born at

Trevecka, on January 23, 1714, and was, therefore, a few months

older than his friend Whitefield. In 1732, when his father died,

Harris took charge of a country school. In 1735, he found peace with

God, through faith in Jesus Christ. Converted himself, he had an

intense desire to convert others. He writes:--

"Swearing, lying, reviling, drunkenness, fighting, and gaming

overspread the country. Ministers were not in earnest, and

their instructions, delivered in an unfeeling and indifferent

manner, seemed to have no effect upon their hearers. I could

not help making it my business to speak to all I came near of

their danger. Death and judgment, and the necessity of praying

and receiving the sacrament, were the principal subjects of my

conversation. I set up family worship in my mother's house, and

on Sunday mornings some of the neighbours would come to hear me

read the lessons and psalms, etc."

He proceeds to relate how he also commenced meetings on Sunday

evenings, and exhorted the poor people who flocked to hear him.

"Thus," he says, "I spent that summer, 1735."

In November following, he relinquished his school, and entered

himself at St. Mary's Hall, Oxford; but the "irregularities and

immoralities which surrounded" him were such, that he kept only a

single term, and returned to Wales. He again set up a school at

Trevecka. He visited from house to house, until he had visited the

greatest part of his native parish. His congregation increased,

and the houses in which they met could not contain them. Many of

his hearers became penitent, and cried to God for the pardon of

their sins. Family worship in numerous instances was begun. The

churches were soon crowded, and likewise the Lord's table. Then

persecution arose. The magistrates threatened him with fines for

holding meetings in private houses. The clergy did their utmost to

discourage him, and, at the end of the year 1737, expelled him from

his school.

Up to the present, in the day-time he had taught his scholars, and

at night had held meetings. Now he had both days and nights at his

disposal, and preached to crowded congregations thirty or forty

times every week. The magistrates threatened him more furiously

than ever; and the clergy preached against him, and branded him as

a deceiver; but, in several counties, a general reformation was

witnessed. Public diversions became unfashionable, and religion

became the common talk. Places of worship were everywhere thronged,

and, in many places, Societies were set up. The Rev. Griffith Jones

began his charity schools. The Rev. Daniel Rowlands and some other

young clergymen began to preach in the same extemporary manner as

Harris did. The work grew, and so also did the persecution. In

Montgomeryshire, "a knight, a clergyman, two justices, a constable,

and a mob," came while Harris was preaching, and charged him with

a breach of the Conventicle Act. The preacher told the magistrates

that he was a Conformist, and therefore not subject to the penalties

of the Act in question. At Machynlleth he was surrounded by a mob,

"threatening, swearing, and flinging stones," the leaders of the

gang being a clergyman and a lawyer. He writes:--

"By the trials through which I often passed, I was at length

so accustomed to them that I was daily in expectation of them.

I became more acquainted with the world and myself, and could

attest the truth of that expression which at first seems harsh,

'Man is a mixture of beast and devil.'"

It is a remarkable fact, that, up to this date, Howell Harris had

never seen either Whitefield or the Wesleys. Whitefield, on his

return from Georgia, heard that the young evangelist, without

episcopal ordination or any sort of ecclesiastical authority

whatever, was preaching in the towns and villages of Wales thirty or

forty times every week; and, notwithstanding the opposition and the

violence of clergymen, magistrates, and mobs, had already been the

means of accomplishing a marvellous reformation. The results were

quite sufficient to constrain Whitefield to recognize the Welsh

itinerant as a fellow-labourer in the same great work. Hence, only

a few days after his arrival in England, Whitefield wrote to Howell

Harris as follows:--

"LONDON, _December 20, 1738_.

"MY DEAR BROTHER,--Though I am unknown to you in person, I have

long been united to you in spirit, and have been rejoiced to

hear how the good pleasure of the Lord prospered in your hand.

Go on, my dear brother, go on. Be strong in the Lord, and in

the power of His might. There have been, and will be, many

adversaries; but be not afraid. He who sent you will assist,

comfort, and protect you, and make you more than conqueror

through His great love. I am a living monument of this, for the

Divine strength has often been magnified in my weakness. I have

tasted that the Lord is gracious; I have felt His power; and,

from experience, can say that, in doing or suffering the will of

Jesus Christ, there is great reward.

"Blessed be His holy name! There seems to be a great pouring out

of the Spirit in London, and we walk in the comfort of the Holy

Ghost, and are edified.

"You see, my dear Brother, the freedom I have taken in writing

to you. If you would favour me with a line or two, by way of

answer, you would greatly rejoice both me and many others. Why

should we not tell one another what God has done for our souls?

"My dear Brother, I love you in the bowels of Jesus Christ, and

wish you may be the spiritual father of thousands, and shine, as

the sun in the firmament, in the kingdom of your heavenly Father.

"Your affectionate, though unworthy brother in Christ,

"GEORGE WHITEFIELD."[173]

[173] "Brief Account of the Life of Harris." Trevecka, 1791, p. 110.

Such was Whitefield's warm-hearted salutation to the young

lay-preacher in the principality of Wales. Harris's reply was

equally cordial. The following is an extract from it:--

"GLAMORGAN, _January 8, 1739_.

"DEAR BROTHER,--I was most agreeably surprised last night

by a letter from you. Though this is the first time of our

correspondence, I am no stranger to you. When I first heard of

your labours and success, my soul was united to you, and engaged

to send addresses to heaven on your behalf. When I read your

Diary, I had uncommon influence of the Divine Presence shining

on my soul almost continually, but I little thought our good

Lord and Master intended I should ever see your handwriting.

Oh how ravishing it is to hear of such demonstrations of

the Divine love and favour to London! And, to make your joy

greater still, I have some good news to send you from Wales.

There is a great revival in Cardiganshire, through Mr. D.

Rowlands, a Church minister, who has been much owned and blessed

in Carmarthenshire also. We have also a sweet prospect in

Breckonshire and part of Monmouthshire. And the revival prospers

in this county where I am now. There is also here a very useful

young dissenting minister, who is a man of great charity. There

is another of the same character in Montgomeryshire. There

are two or three young curates in Glamorganshire, who are

well-wishers to the cause of God; and we have an exceedingly

valuable clergyman in Breckonshire. But enemies are many and

powerful. Oh that I had more love in my soul, more humble zeal,

and spiritual boldness!"[174]

After this long but not useless digression, it is time to return to

Whitefield.

He was detained in England much longer than he expected, but he

was not unmindful of his flock in Georgia. In a letter "to the

inhabitants of Savannah," dated January 19, 1739, he says:--

"You are upon my heart, so that I am ready to live and die with

you. As soon as my affairs are finished in England, I shall

return to you. The trustees have now appointed me minister

of Savannah, and granted all I desired of them, so that I

have nothing to do but to watch over your souls, that I may

present you blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Be steadfast, therefore, my brethren, be unmoveable. Carefully

attend to the words spoken by your present pastor. Let love

be without dissimulation. Let not slander so much as be named

amongst you, as becometh saints. Be not slothful in business,

yet take heed that you are fervent in spirit, serving the

Lord. Pray without ceasing; in everything give thanks; and

assure yourselves you are continually remembered by your most

affectionate pastor,

"GEORGE WHITEFIELD."[174]

[174] Morgan's "Life and Times of Howell Harris," p. 30.

Before leaving for the West of England, Whitefield's last Sunday in

London was a memorable one. He shall relate his own story.

"1739. Sunday, February 4. Preached in the morning at St.

George's in the East; collected £18 for the Orphan House; and

had, I believe, six hundred communicants, which highly offended

the officiating curate. Preached again at Christ Church,

Spitalfields; and gave thanks and sang psalms at a private

house. Went thence to St. Margaret's Westminster; but, something

breaking belonging to the coach, could not get thither till the

middle of the prayers. Went through the people to the minister's

pew, but, finding it locked, I returned to the vestry till

the sexton could be found. Being there informed that another

minister intended to preach, I desired several times that I

might go home. My friends would by no means consent, telling me

I was appointed by the trustees to preach; and that, if I did

not, the people would go out of the church. At my request, some

went to the trustees, churchwardens, and minister; and, whilst

I was waiting for an answer, and the last psalm was being sung,

a man came, with a wand in his hand, whom I took for the proper

church officer, and told me I was to preach. I, not doubting but

the minister was satisfied, followed him to the pulpit, and God

enabled me to preach with greater power than I had done all the

day before.

"After this, I prayed with and gave an exhortation to a company

that waited for me. Then I went to Fetter Lane, where I spent

the whole night in watching unto prayer, and discussing several

important points with many truly Christian friends. About four

in the morning, we went all together, and broke bread at a poor

sick sister's room; and so we parted, I hope, in a spirit not

unlike that of the primitive Christians."

This is soon related, but the service at St. Margaret's must have

further notice. It engendered a rancorous controversy, which cannot,

in fairness, be omitted.

In a long leading article in the _Weekly Miscellany_ of February 10,

1739, the following account was published:--

"On Sunday last, our new _Methodists_ discovered a more violent

temper than is consistent with their great pretensions to

_meekness_ and _sanctity_. The story is as follows, and it was

related to me by the gentleman that read the prayers:--

"At St. Margaret's, Westminster, there is a _Society_ Evening

Lecture; and when the Reader came, he found in the _churchyard_,

at the _west door_, a number of people singing psalms. When he

got into the _church_, he was affronted by some unknown persons

as he passed through a great crowd to the vestry. As soon as the

clergyman appointed to _preach_ came, he was _solicited_ (if an

_overbearing importunity_ may be so called) to resign the pulpit

to Mr. Whitefield, who (as is supposed by his not appearing at

the _prayers_) was waiting at some neighbouring house to know

the issue of their application. But the _preacher_ continuing

as determined to do his duty as Mr. Whitefield was to do it for

him, they at last effected that by _force_ which they could

not gain by _treaty_. So the _preacher_ was safely confined

in his _pew_, which was locked (the sexton being appointed by

the _Society_, and in Mr. Whitefield's interest), and guarded

by several lusty fellows; while another party conveyed the

_unlicensed intruder_ triumphantly up into the pulpit, and kept

sentry on the stairs for fear he should be taken down in as

forcible a manner as he got up."

The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 61 / 162 题