1877.
[In this year he delivered lectures and addresses on the "Geological
History of Birds," at the Zoological Society's Gardens, June 7; on
"Starfishes and their Allies," at the Royal Institution, March 7; at
the London Institution, December 17, on "Belemnites" (a subject on
which he had written in 1864, and which was doubtless suggested anew
by his autumn holiday at Whitby, where the Lias cliffs are full of
these fossils); at the Anthropological Conference, May 22, on
"Elementary Instruction in Physiology" ("Collected Essays" 3 294),
with special reference to the recent legislation as to experiments on
living animals; and on "Technical Education" to the Working Men's Club
and Institute, December 1 ("Collected Essays" 3 404): a perilous
subject, indeed, considering, as he remarks, that] "any candid
observer of the phenomena of modern society will readily admit that
bores must be classed among the enemies of the human race; and a
little consideration will probably lead him to the further admission,
that no species of that extensive genus of noxious creatures is more
objectionable than the educational bore...In the course of the last
ten years, to go back no farther, I am afraid to say how often I have
ventured to speak of education; indeed, the only part of this wide
region into which, as yet, I have not adventured, is that into which I
propose to intrude to-day."
[The choice of subject for this address was connected with a larger
campaign for the establishment of technical education on a proper
footing, which began with his work on the School Board, and was this
year brought prominently before the public by another address
delivered at the Society of Arts. The Clothworkers Company had already
been assisting the Society of Arts in their efforts for the spread of
technical education; and in July 1877 a special committee of the
Guilds applied to him, amongst half a dozen others, to furnish them
with a report as to the objects and methods of a scheme of technical
education. This paper fills sixteen pages in the Report of the Livery
Companies' Committee for 1878. The fundamental principles on which he
bases his practical recommendations are contained in the following
paragraph:--]
It appears to me that if every person who is engaged in an industry
had access to instruction in the scientific principles on which that
industry is based; in the mode of applying these principles to
practice; in the actual use of the means and appliances employed; in
the language of the people who know as much about the matter as we do
ourselves; and lastly, in the art of keeping accounts, Technical
Education would have done all that can be required of it.
[And his suggestions about buildings was at once adopted by the
Committee, namely, that they should be erected at a future date,
regard being had primarily rather to what is wanted in the inside than
what will look well from the outside.
Now the Guilds formed a very proper body to set such a scheme on foot,
because only such wealthy and influential members of the first
mercantile city in the world could afford to let themselves be
despised and jeered at for professing to teach English manufacturers
and English merchants that they needed to be taught; and to spend
25,000 pounds a year towards that end for some time without apparent
result.
That they eventually succeeded, is due no little to the careful plans
drawn out by Huxley. He may be described as "really the engineer of
the City and Guilds Institute; for without his advice," declared one
of the leading members, "we should not have known what to have done."
At the same time he warned them against indiscriminate zeal;] "though
under-instruction is a bad thing, it is not impossible that
over-instruction may be worse." [The aim of the Livery Companies
should specially be to aid the PRACTICAL teaching of science, so that
at bottom the question turns mainly on the supply of teachers.
On December 11, 1879, he found a further opportunity of urging the
cause of Technical Education. A lecture on Apprenticeships was
delivered before the Society of Arts by Professor Silvanus Thompson.
Speaking after the lecturer (see report in "Nature" 1879 page 139) he
discussed the necessity of supplying the place of the old
apprenticeships by educating children in the principles of their
particular crafts, beyond the time when they were forced to enter the
workshops. This could be done by establishing schools in each centre
of industry, connected with a central institution, such as was to be
found in Paris or Zurich. As for complaints of deficient teaching of
handicrafts in the Board Schools, it was more important for them to
make intelligent men than skilled workmen, as again was indicated in
the French system.
As President of the Royal Society, he was on the above-mentioned
Committee of the Guilds from 1883 to 1885, and on December 10, 1883,
distributed the prizes in connection with the institution in the
Clothworkers' Hall. After sketching the inception of the whole scheme,
he referred to the Central Institute, then in course of building
(begun in 1882, it was finished in 1884; the Technical College,
Finsbury, was older by a year), and spoke of the difficulties in the
way of organising such an institution:--]
That building is simply the body, not the flesh and bones, but the
bricks and stones, of the Central Institute, and the business upon
which Sir F. Bramwell and my other colleagues on the Committee have
been so much occupied, is the making a soul for this body; and I can
assure you making a soul for anything is an amazingly difficult
operation. You are always in danger of doing as the man in the story
of Frankenstein did, and making something which will eventually devour
you instead of being useful to you.
[And here I may give a letter which refers to the movement for
technical education, and the getting the City Companies under way in
the matter. In the words of Mr. George Howell, M.P. (who sent it to
the "Times" (July 3, 1895) just after Huxley's death), it has an
additional interest "as indicating the nature of his own epitaph"; as
a man "whose highest ambition ever was to uplift the masses of the
people and promote their welfare intellectually, socially, and
industrially."]
4 Marlborough Place, N.W., January 2, 1880.
Dear Mr. Howell,
Your letter is a welcome New Year's gift. There are two things I
really care about--one is the progress of scientific thought, and the
other is the bettering of the condition of the masses of the people by
bettering them in the way of lifting themselves out of the misery
which has hitherto been the lot of the majority of them. Posthumous
fame is not particularly attractive to me, but, if I am to be
remembered at all, I would rather it should be as "a man who did his
best to help the people" than by other title. So you see it is no
small pleasure and encouragement to me to find that I have been, and
am, of any use in this direction.
Ever since my experience on the School Board, I have been convinced
that I should lose rather than gain by entering directly into
politics...But I suppose I have some ten years of activity left in me,
and you may depend upon it I shall lose no chance of striking a blow
for the cause I have at heart. I thought the time had come the other
day at the Society of Arts, and the event proves I was not mistaken.
The animal is moving, and by a judicious exhibition of carrots in
front and kicks behind, we shall get him into a fine trot presently.
In the meantime do not let the matter rest...The (City) companies
should be constantly reminded that a storm is brewing. There are
excellent men among them, who want to do what is right, and need help
against the sluggards and reactionaries. It will be best for me to be
quiet for a while, but you will understand that I am watching for the
turn of events.
I am, yours very faithfully,
T.H. Huxley.
[This summer, too, he delivered a course on Biology for Teachers at
South Kensington, and published not only his "American Addresses," but
also the "Physiography," founded upon the course delivered seven years
before. The book, of which 3386 copies were sold in the first six
weeks, was fruitful in two ways; it showed that a geographical subject
could be invested with interest, and it set going what was almost a
new branch of teaching in natural science, even in Germany, the
starting place of most educational methods, where it was immediately
proposed to bring out an adaptation of the book, substituting, e.g.
the Elbe for the Thames, as a familiar example of river action.
He was immensely pleased by a letter from Mr. John Morley, telling how
his step-son, a boy of non-bookish tastes, had been taken with it. "My
step-son was reading it the other night. I said, 'isn't it better to
read a novel before going to bed, instead of worrying your head over a
serious book like that?' 'Oh,' said he, 'I'm at an awfully interesting
part, and I can't leave off.'" It was, Mr. Morley continued, "the way
of making Nature, as she comes before us every day, interesting and
intelligible to young folks."
To this he replied on December 14:--]
I shall get as vain as a peacock if discreet folk like you say such
pretty things to me as you do about the "Physiography."
But it is very pleasant to me to find that I have succeeded in what I
tried to do. I gave the lectures years ago to show what I thought was
the right way to lead young people to the study of nature--but nobody
would follow suit--so now I have tried what the book will do.
Your step-son is a boy of sense, and I hope he may be taken as a type
of the British public!
[A good deal of time was taken up in the first half of the year by the
Scottish Universities Commission, which necessitated his attendance in
Edinburgh the last week in February, the first week in April, and the
last week in July. He had hoped to finish off the necessary business
at the first of these meetings, but no sooner had he arrived in
Edinburgh, after a pleasant journey down with J.A. Froude, than he
learned that] "the chief witness we were to have examined to-day, and
whose due evisceration was one of the objects of my coming, has
telegraphed to say he can't be here." [Owing to this and to the
enforced absence of the judges on the Commission from some of the
sittings, it was found necessary to have additional meetings at
Easter, much to his disgust. He writes:--]
I am sorry to say I shall have to come here again in Easter week. It
is the only time the Lord President is free from his courts, and
although we all howled privately, there was no help for it. Whether we
finish then or not will depend on the decision of the Government, as
to our taking up the case of you troublesome women, who want admission
into the University (very rightly too I think). If we have to go into
this question it will involve the taking of new evidence and no end of
bother. I find my colleagues very reasonable, and I hope some good may
be done, that is the only consolation.
I went out with Blackie last evening to dine with the Skeltons, at a
pretty place called the Hermitage, about three miles from
here...Blackie and I walked home with snow on the ground and a sharp
frost. I told you it would turn cold as soon as I got here, but I am
none the worse.
[It was just the same in April:--]
It is quite cold here as usual, and there was ice on the ponds we
passed this morning...I am much better lodged than I was last time,
for the same thanks to John Bruce, but I do believe that the Edinburgh
houses are the coldest in the universe. In spite of a good breakfast
and a good fire, the half of me that is writing to you is as cold as
charity.
April 4.
We toil at the Commission every day, and don't make any rapid
progress. An awful fear creeps over me that we shall not finish this
bout.
[While he was in Edinburgh for the third time, his attention was
called to an article in the "Echo," the organ of the anti-vivisection
party. He writes:--]
The "Echo" is pretty. It is one of a long series of articles from the
same hand, but I don't think they hurt anybody and they evidently
please the writer. For some reason or other they have not attacked me
yet, but I suppose my turn will come.
[Again:--]
Thank you for sending me John Bright's speeches. They are very good,
but hardly up to his old mark of eloquence. Some parts are very
touching.
[His health was improving, as he notes with satisfaction:--]
Every day this week we have had about four hours of the Commission,
and I have dined out four days out of the six. But I'm no the waur,
and the late dinners have not been visited by fits of morning blue
devils. So I am in hopes that I am getting back to the normal state
that Clark prophesied for me.
4 Marlborough Place, London, N.W., April 29, 1877.
My dear Skelton,
Best thanks for your second edition. You paint the system (i.e. of
Scotch education.) in such favourable colours, that I am thinking of
taking advantage of it for my horde of "young barbarians." I am sure
Scotch air would be of service to them--and in after-life they might
have the inestimable advantage of a quasi-Scotch nationality--that
greatest of all practical advantages in Britain.
We are to sit again in the end of July when Mrs. Skelton and you, if
you are wise, will be making holiday.
Your invitation is most tempting, and if I had no work to do I should
jump at it.
But alas! I shall have a deal of work, and I must go to my Patmos in
George Street. Ingrained laziness is the bane of my existence; and you
don't suppose that with the sun shining down into your bosky dell, and
Mrs. Skelton radiant, and Froude and yourself nicotiant, I am such a
Philistine as to do a stroke of work?
Ever yours very faithfully,
T.H. Huxley.
[From Edinburgh he went to St. Andrews to make arrangements for his
elder son to go to the University there as a student the following
winter. Then he paid a visit to Sir W. Armstrong in Northumberland,
afterwards spending a month at Whitby. His holiday work consisted in a
great part of the article on "Evolution" for the "Encyclopaedia
Britannica," which is noted as finished on October 24, though not
published till the next year.
In November the honorary degree of LL.D. was conferred upon Charles
Darwin at Cambridge,] "a great step for Cambridge, though it may not
seem much in itself," [he writes to Dohrn, November 21. In the evening
after the public ceremony there was a dinner of the Philosophical
Club, at which he spoke in praise of Darwin's services to science.
Darwin himself was unable to be present, but received an enthusiastic
account of the proceedings from his son, and wrote to thank Huxley,
who replied:--]
4 Marlborough Place, November 21, 1877.
My dear Darwin,
Nothing ever gave me greater pleasure than the using the chance of
speaking my mind about you and your work which was afforded me at the
dinner the other night. I said not a word beyond what I believe to be
strictly accurate; and, please Sir, I didn't sneer at anybody. There
was only a little touch of the whip at starting, and it was so tied
round with ribbons that it took them some time to find out where the
flick had hit.
T.H. Huxley.
[He writes to his wife:--]
I will see if I can recollect the speech. I made a few notes sitting
in Dewar's room before the dinner. But as usual I did not say some
things I meant to say and said others that came up on the spur of the
moment.
[And again:--]
Please I didn't say that Reaumur was the other greatest scientific man
since Aristotle. But I said that in a certain character of his work he
was the biggest man between Aristotle and Darwin. I really must write
out an "authorised version" of my speech. I hear the Latin oration is
to be in "Nature" this week, and Lockyer wanted me to give him the
heads of my speech, but I did not think it would be proper to do so,
and refused. I have written out my speech as well as I can recollect
it. I do not mind any friend seeing it, but you must not let it get
about as the dinner was a private one.
[The notes of his speech run as follows:--]
Mr. President,
I rise with pleasure and with alacrity to respond to the toast which
you have just proposed, and I may say that I consider one of the
greatest honours which have befallen me, to be called upon to
represent my distinguished friend Mr. Darwin upon this occasion. I say
to represent Mr. Darwin, for I cannot hope to personate him, or to say
all that would be dictated by a mind conspicuous for its powerful
humility and strong gentleness.
Mr. Darwin's work had fully earned the distinction you have to-day
conferred upon him four-and-twenty years ago; but I doubt not that he
would have found in that circumstance an exemplification of the wise
foresight of his revered intellectual mother. Instead of offering her
honours when they ran a chance of being crushed beneath the
accumulated marks of approbation of the whole civilised world, the
University has waited until the trophy was finished, and has crowned
the edifice with the delicate wreath of academic appreciation.
This is what I suppose Mr. Darwin might have said had he been happily
able to occupy my place. Let me now speak in my own person and in
obedience to your suggestion, let me state as briefly as possible what
appear to me to be Mr. Darwin's distinctive merits.
From the time of Aristotle to the present day I know of but one man
who has shown himself Mr. Darwin's equal in one field of research--and
that is Reaumur. In the breadth of range of Mr. Darwin's
investigations upon the ways and works of animals and plants, in the
minute patient accuracy of his observations, and in the philosophical
ideas which have guided them, I know of no one who is to be placed in
the same rank with him except Reaumur.
Secondly, looking back through the same long period of scientific
history, I know of but one man, Lyonnet, who not being from his youth
a trained anatomist, has published such an admirable minute anatomical
research as is contained in Mr. Darwin's work on the Cirripedes.
Thirdly, in that region which lies between Geology and Biology, and is
occupied by the problem of the influence of life on the structure of
the globe, no one, so far as I know, has done a more brilliant and
far-reaching piece of work than the famous book upon Coral Reefs.
I add to these as incidental trifles the numerous papers on Geology,
and that most delightful of popular scientific books, the "Journal of
a Naturalist," and I think I have made out my case for the
justification of to-day's proceedings.
But I have omitted something. There is the "Origin of Species," and
all that has followed it from the same marvellously fertile brain.
Most people know Mr. Darwin only as the author of this work, and of
the form of evolutional doctrine which it advocates. I desire to say
nothing about that doctrine. My friend Dr. Humphry has said that the
University has by to-day's proceedings committed itself to the
doctrine of evolution. I can only say "I am very glad to hear it." But
whether that doctrine be true or whether it be false, I wish to
express the deliberate opinion, that from Aristotle's great summary of
the Biological knowledge of his time down to the present day, there is
nothing comparable to the "Origin of Species," as a connected survey
of the phenomena of life permeated and vivified by a central idea. In
remote ages the historian of science will dwell upon it as the
starting-point of the Biology of his present and our future.
My friend Dr. Humphry has adverted to somebody about whom I know
nothing, who says that the exact and critical studies pursued in this
University are ill-calculated to preserve a high tone of mind.
I presume that this saying must proceed from some one wholly
unacquainted with Cambridge. Whoever he may be, I beg him, if he can,
to make the acquaintance of Charles Darwin.
In Mr. Darwin's name I beg leave to thank you for the honour you have
done him.
[It happened that the quadrennial election of a Lord Rector at St.
Andrews University fell in this year, and on behalf of a number of
students, Huxley received a telegram from his son, now newly entered
at St. Andrews, asking him to stand. He writes to his wife:--]
That boy of yours has just sent me a telegram, which I enclose. I sent
back message to say that as a Commissioner on the Scotch Universities
I could not possibly stand. The cockerel is beginning to crow early. I
do believe that to please the boy I should have assented to it if it
had not been for the Royal Commission.
[Apropos of controversies (November 23)]
We had a grand discussion at the Royal Society last night between
Tyndall and Burdon Sanderson. The place was crammed, and we had a late
sitting. I'm not sure, however, that we had got much further at the
end than at the beginning, which is a way controversies have.
[The following story is worth recording, as an illustration not only
of the way in which Huxley would give what help was in his power to
another man of science in distress, but of the ready aid proffered on
this, as on many other occasions, by a wealthy northern merchant who
was interested in science. A German scientific worker in England, whom
we will call H., had fallen into distress, and applied to him for
help, asking if some work could not be put in his way. Huxley could
think of nothing immediate but to suggest some lessons in German
literature to his children, though in fact they were well provided for
with a German governess; nevertheless he thought it a proper occasion
to avail himself of his friend's offer to give help in deserving
cases. He writes to his wife:--]
I made up my mind to write to X. the day before yesterday; this
morning by return of post he sends me a cheque not only for the 60
pounds which I said H. needed, but 5 pounds over for his present needs
with a charming letter.
It came in the nick of time, as H. came an hour or two after it
arrived, and with many apologies told me he was quite penniless. The
poor old fellow was quite overcome when I told him of how matters
stood, and it was characteristic that as soon as he got his breath
again, he wanted to know when he would begin teaching the children! I
sent him to get an order on the Naples bank for discharge of his debt
there. X.'s express stipulation was that his name should not be
mentioned, so mind you say not a word about his most kind and generous
act.
[The following letters of miscellaneous interest were written in this
year:--]
4 Marlborough Place, November 21, 1877.
My dear Morley,
I am always at the command of the "Fortnightly" so long as you are
editor, but I don't think that the Belemnite business would do for
you. [The lecture at the London Institution mentioned above.] The
story would hardly be intelligible without illustrations.
There are two things I am going to do which may be more to the
purpose. One is a screed on Technical Education which I am going to
give to the Working Men's Union on the 1st December.
The other is a sort of Eloge on Harvey at the Royal Institution in
March apropos of his 300th birthday--which was Allfools Day.
You shall have either of these you like, but I advise Harvey; as if I
succeed in doing what I shall aim at it will be interesting.
Why the deuce do you live at Brighton? St. John's Wood is far less
cockneyfied, and its fine and Alpine air would be much better for you,
and I believe for Mrs. Morley, than the atmosphere of the melancholy
main, the effects of which on the human constitution have been so well
expounded by that eminent empiric, Dr. Dizzy.
Anyhow, I wish we could see something of you now and then.
Ever yours very faithfully,
T.H. Huxley.
Darwin got his degree with great eclat on Saturday. I had to return
thanks for his health at the dinner of the Philosophical Society; and
oh! I chaffed the dons so sweetly.
4 Marlborough Place, N.W., November 27, 1877.
My dear Morley,
You shall have both the articles--if it is only that I may enjoy the
innocent pleasure of Knowles' face when I let him know what has become
of them. [The rival editor. Cp. above.]
Stormy ocean, forsooth! I back the storm and rain through which I came
home to-night against anything London-super-mare has to show.
I will send the manuscript to Virtue as soon as it is in a reasonable
state.
Ever yours very faithfully,
T.H. Huxley.
4 Marlborough Place, N.W., January 8, 1878.
My dear Morley,
Many thanks for the cheque. In my humble judgment it is quite as much
as the commodity is worth.
It was a great pleasure to us all to have you with us on New Year's
Day. My wife claims it as her day, and I am not supposed to know
anything about the guests except Spencer and Tyndall. None but the
very elect are invited to the sacred feast--so you see where you stand
among the predestined who cannot fall away from the state of grace.
I have not seen Spencer in such good form and good humour combined for
an age.
I am working away at Harvey, and will send the manuscript to Virtue's
as soon as I am sufficiently forward.
Ever yours very faithfully,
T.H. Huxley.
4 Marlborough Place, December 9, 1877.
My dear Tyndall,
I am so sorry to have been out when Mrs. Tyndall called to-day. By
what we heard at the x on Thursday, I imagined you were practically
all right again, or I should have been able to look after you to-day.
But what I bother you with this note for is to beg you not to lecture
at the London Institution to-morrow, but to let me change days with
you, and so give yourself a week to recover. And if you are seedy,
then I am quite ready to give them another lecture on the Hokypotamus
or whatever else may turn up.
But don't go and exert yourself in your present condition. These
severe colds have often nothing very tangible about them, but are not
to be trifled with when folks are past fifty.
Let me have an answer to say that I may send a telegram to Nicholson
first thing to-morrow morning to say that I will lecture vice you. My
"bottled life," as Hutton calls it in the "Spectator" this week, is
quite ready to go off. [The "Spectator" for December 8, 1877, began an
article thus:--"Professor Huxley delivered a very amusing address last
Saturday at the Society of Arts, on the very unpromising subject of
technical education; but we believe that if Professor Huxley were to
become the President of the Social Science Association, or of the
International Statistical Congress, he would still be amusing, so much
bottled life does he infuse into the driest topic on which human
beings ever contrived to prose."]
Now be a sane man and take my advice.
Ever yours faithfully,
T.H. Huxley.