CHAPTER 2.3.

1872.

[Dyspepsia, that most distressing of maladies, had laid firm hold upon

him. He was compelled to take entire rest for a time. But his first

holiday produced no lasting effect, and in the summer he was again

very ill. Then the worry of a troublesome lawsuit in connection with

the building of his new house intensified both bodily illness and

mental depression. He had great fears of being saddled with heavy

costs at the moment when he was least capable of meeting any new

expense--hardly able even to afford another much-needed spell of rest.

But in his case, as in others, at this critical moment the circle of

fellow-workers in science to whom he was bound by ties of friendship,

resolved that he should at least not lack the means of recovery. In

their name Charles Darwin wrote him the following letter, of which it

is difficult to say whether it does more honour to him who sent it or

to him who received it:--

Down, Beckenham, Kent, April 23, 1873.

My dear Huxley,

I have been asked by some of your friends (eighteen in number) to

inform you that they have placed through Robarts, Lubbock & Company,

the sum of 2100 pounds sterling to your account at your bankers. We

have done this to enable you to get such complete rest as you may

require for the re-establishment of your health; and in doing this we

are convinced that we act for the public interest, as well as in

accordance with our most earnest desires. Let me assure you that we

are all your warm personal friends, and that there is not a stranger

or mere acquaintance amongst us. If you could have heard what was

said, or could have read what was, as I believe, our inmost thoughts,

you would know that we all feel towards you, as we should to an

honoured and much loved brother. I am sure that you will return this

feeling, and will therefore be glad to give us the opportunity of

aiding you in some degree, as this will be a happiness to us to the

last day of our lives. Let me add that our plan occurred to several of

your friends at nearly the same time and quite independently of one

another.

My dear Huxley, your affectionate friend,

Charles Darwin.

It was a poignant moment.] "What have I done to deserve this?" [he

exclaimed. The relief from anxiety, so generously proffered, entirely

overcame him; and for the first time, he allowed himself to confess

that in the long struggle against ill-health, he had been beaten; but,

as he said, only enough to teach him humility.

His first trip in search of health was in 1872, when he obtained two

months' leave of absence, and prepared to go to the Mediterranean. His

lectures to women on Physiology at South Kensington were taken over by

Dr. Michael Foster, who had already acted as his substitute in the

Fullerian course of 1868. But even on this cruise after health he was

not altogether free from business. The stores of biscuit at Gibraltar

and Malta were infested with a small grub and its cocoons. Complaints

to the home authorities were met by the answer that the stores were

prepared from the purest materials and sent out perfectly free from

the pest. Discontent among the men was growing serious, when he was

requested by the Admiralty to investigate the nature of the grub and

the best means of preventing its ravages. In the end he found that the

biscuits were packed within range of stocks of newly arrived,

unpurified cocoa, from which the eggs were blown into the stores while

being packed, and there hatched out. Thereafter the packing was done

in another place and the complaints ceased.]

January 3, 1872.

My dear Dohrn,

It is true enough that I am somewhat "erkrankt," though beyond general

weariness, incapacity and disgust with things in general, I do not

precisely know what is the matter with me.

Unwillingly, I begin to suspect that I overworked myself last year.

Doctors talk seriously to me, and declare that all sorts of wonderful

things will happen if I do not take some more efficient rest than I

have had for a long time. My wife adds her quota of persuasion and

admonition, until I really begin to think I must do something, if only

to have peace.

What if I were to come and look you up in Naples, somewhere in

February, as soon as my lectures are over?

The "one-plate system" might cure me of my incessant dyspeptic nausea.

A detestable grub--larva of Ephestia elatella--has been devouring Her

Majesty's stores of biscuits at Gibraltar. I have had to look into his

origin, history, and best way of circumventing him--and maybe I shall

visit Gibraltar and perhaps Malta. In that case, you will see me turn

up some of these days at the Palazzo Torlonia.

Herbert Spencer has written a friendly attack on "Administrative

Nihilism," which I will send you; in the same number of the

"Fortnightly" there is an absurd epicene splutter on the same subject

by Mill's step-daughter, Miss Helen Taylor. I intended to publish the

paper separately, with a note about Spencer's criticism, but I have

had no energy nor faculty to do anything lately.

Tell Lankester, with best regards, that I believe the teaching of

teachers in 1872 is arranged, and that I shall look for his help in

due course.

The "Happy family" have had the measles since you saw them, but they

are well again.

I write in Jermyn Street, so they cannot send messages; otherwise

there would be a chorus from them and the wife of good wishes and kind

remembrances.

Ever yours,

T.H. Huxley.

[He left Southampton on January 11, in the "Malta." On the 16th, he

notes in his diary,] "I was up just in time see the great portal of

the Mediterranean well. It was a lovely morning, and nothing could be

grander than Ape Hill on one side and the Rock on the other, looking

like great lions or sphinxes on each side of a gateway."

[The morning after his arrival he breakfasted with Admiral Hornby, who

sent him over to Tangier in the "Helicon," giving the Bishop of

Gibraltar a passage at the same time. This led him to note down,] "How

the naval men love Baxter and all his works." [A letter from Dr.

Hooker to Sir John Hay ensured him a most hospitable welcome, though

continual rain spoiled his excursions. On the 21st he returned to

Gibraltar, leaving three days later in the "Nyanza" for Alexandria,

which was reached on February 1. At that "muddy hole" he landed in

pouring rain, and it was not till he reached Cairo the following day

that he at last got into his longed-for sunshine.

Seeing that three of his eight weeks had been spent in merely getting

to sunshine, his wife and doctor conspired to apply for a third month

of leave, which was immediately granted, so that he was able to accept

the invitation of two friends to go with them up the Nile as far as

Assouan in that most restful of conveyances, a dahabieh.

Cairo more than answered his expectations. He stayed here till the

13th, making several excursions in company with Sir W. Gregory,

notably to Boulak Museum, where he particularly notes the "man with

ape" from Memphis; and, of course, the pyramids, of which he remarks

that Cephren's is cased at the top with limestone, not granite. His

notebook and sketch-book show that he was equally interested in

archeology, in the landscape and scenes of everyday life, and in the

peculiar geographical and geological features of the country. His

first impression of the Delta was its resemblance to Belgium and

Lincolnshire. He has sections and descriptions of the Mokatta hill,

and the windmill mound, with a general panorama of the surrounding

country and an explanation of it. He remarks at Memphis how the

unburnt brick of which the mounds are made up had in many places

become remanie into a stratified deposit--distinguishable from Nile

mud chiefly by the pottery fragments--and notes the bearing of this

fact on the Cairo mounds. It is the same on his trip up the Nile; he

jots down the geology whenever opportunity offered; remarks, as

indication of the former height of the river, a high mud-bank beyond

Edfou, and near Assouan a pot-hole in the granite fifty feet above the

present level. Here is a detailed description of the tomb of Aahmes;

there a river-scene beside the pyramid of Meidum; or vivid sketches of

vulture and jackal at a meal in the desert, the jackal in possession

of the carcass, the vulture impatiently waiting his good pleasure for

the last scraps; of the natives working at the endless shadoofs; of a

group of listeners around a professional story-teller--unfinished, for

he was observed sketching them.

Egypt left a profound impression upon him. His artistic delight in it

apart, the antiquities and geology of the country were a vivid

illustration to his trained eye of the history of man and the

influence upon him of the surrounding country, the link between

geography and history.

He left behind him for a while a most unexpected memorial of his

visit. A friend not long after going to the pyramids, was delighted to

find himself thus adjured by a donkey-boy, who tried to cut out his

rival with "Not him donkey, sah; him donkey bad, sah; my donkey good;

my donkey 'Fessor-uxley donkey, sah." It appears that the Cairo

donkey-boys have a way of naming their animals after celebrities whom

they have borne on their backs.

While at Thebes, on his way down the river again, he received news of

the death of the second son of Matthew Arnold, to whom he wrote the

following letter:--]

Thebes, March 10, 1872.

My dear Arnold,

I cannot tell you how shocked I was to see in the papers we received

yesterday the announcement of the terrible blow which has fallen upon

Mrs. Arnold and yourself.

Your poor boy looked such a fine manly fellow the last time I saw him,

when we dined at your house, that I had to read the paragraph over and

over again before I could bring myself to believe what I read. And it

is such a grievous opening of a wound hardly yet healed that I hardly

dare to think of the grief which must have bowed down Mrs. Arnold and

yourself.

I hardly know whether I do well in writing to you. If such trouble

befell me there are very few people in the world from whom I could

bear even sympathy--but you would be one of them, and therefore I hope

that you will forgive a condolence which will reach you so late as to

disturb rather than soothe, for the sake of the hearty affection which

dictates it.

My wife has told me of the very kind letter you wrote her. I was

thoroughly broken down when I left England, and did not get much

better until I fell into the utter and absolute laziness of dahabieh

life. A month of that has completely set me up. I am as well as ever;

and though very grateful to Old Nile for all that he has done for

me--not least for a whole universe of new thoughts and pictures of

life--I begin to feel strongly

'the need of a world of men for me.'

But I am not going to overwork myself again. Pray make my kindest

remembrances to Mrs. Arnold, and believe me, always yours very

faithfully,

T.H. Huxley.

[Leaving Assouan on March 3, and Cairo on the 18th, he returned by way

of Messina to Naples, taking a day at Catania to look at Etna. At

Naples he found his friend Dohrn was absent, and his place as host was

filled by his father. Vesuvius was ascended, Pozzuoli and Pompeii

visited, and two days spent in Rome.]

Hotel de Grande Bretagne, Naples, March 31, 1872.

My dear Tyndall,

Your very welcome letter did not reach me until the 18th of March,

when I returned to Cairo from my expedition to Assouan. Like Johnny

Gilpin, I "little thought when I set out, of running such a rig"; but

while at Cairo I fell in with Ossory of the Athenaeum, and a very

pleasant fellow, Charles Ellis, who had taken a dahabieh, and were

about to start up the Nile. They invited me to take possession of a

vacant third cabin, and I accepted their hospitality, with the

intention of going as far as Thebes and returning on my own hook. But

when we got to Thebes I found there was no getting away again without

much more exposure and fatigue than I felt justified in facing just

then, and as my friends showed no disposition to be rid of me, I stuck

to the boat, and only left them on the return voyage at Rodu, which is

the terminus of the railway, about 150 miles from Cairo.

We had an unusually quick journey, as I was little more than a month

away from Cairo, and as my companions made themselves very agreeable,

it was very pleasant. I was not particularly well at first, but by

degrees the utter rest of this "always afternoon" sort of life did its

work, and I am as well and vigorous now as ever I was in my life.

I should have been home within a fortnight of the time I had

originally fixed. This would have been ample time to have enabled me

to fulfil all the engagements I had made before starting; and Donnelly

had given me to understand that "My Lords" would not trouble their

heads about my stretching my official leave. Nevertheless I was very

glad to find the official extension (which was the effect of my wife's

and your and Bence Jones's friendly conspiracy) awaiting me at Cairo.

A rapid journey home via Brindisi might have rattled my brains back

into the colloid state in which they were when I left England. Looking

back through the past six months I begin to see that I have had a

narrow escape from a bad breakdown, and I am full of good resolutions.

As the first-fruit of these you see that I have given up the School

Board, and I mean to keep clear of all that semi-political work

hereafter. I see that Sandon (whom I met at Alexandria) and Miller

have followed my example, and that Lord Lawrence is likely to go. What

a skedaddle!

It seems very hard to escape, however. Since my arrival here, on

taking up the "Times" I saw a paragraph about the Lord Rectorship of

St. Andrews. After enumerating a lot of candidates for that honour,

the paragraph concluded, "But we understand that at present Professor

Huxley has the best chance." It is really too bad if any one has been

making use of my name without my permission. But I don't know what to

do about it. I had half a mind to write to Tulloch to tell him that I

can't and won't take any such office, but I should look rather foolish

if he replied that it was a mere newspaper report, and that nobody

intended to put me up.

Egypt interested me profoundly, but I must reserve the tale of all I

did and saw there for word of mouth. From Alexandria I went to

Messina, and thence made an excursion along the lovely Sicilian coast

to Catania and Etna. The old giant was half covered with snow, and

this fact, which would have tempted you to go to the top, stopped me.

But I went to the Val del Bove, whence all the great lava streams have

flowed for the last two centuries, and feasted my eyes with its rugged

grandeur. From Messina I came on here, and had the great good fortune

to find Vesuvius in eruption. Before this fact the vision of good

Bence Jones forbidding much exertion vanished into thin air, and on

Thursday up I went in company with Ray Lankester and my friend Dohrn's

father, Dohrn himself being unluckily away. We had a glorious day, and

did not descend till late at night. The great crater was not very

active, and contented itself with throwing out great clouds of steam

and volleys of red-hot stones now and then. These were thrown towards

the south-west side of the cone, so that it was practicable to walk

all round the northern and eastern lip, and look down into the Hell

Gate. I wished you were there to enjoy the sight as much as I did. No

lava was issuing from the great crater, but on the north side of this,

a little way below the top, an independent cone had established itself

as the most charming little pocket-volcano imaginable. It could not

have been more than 100 feet high, and at the top was a crater not

more than six or seven feet across. Out of this, with a noise exactly

resembling a blast furnace and a slowly-working high pressure steam

engine combined, issued a violent torrent of steam and fragments of

semi-fluid lava as big as one's fist, and sometimes bigger. These shot

up sometimes as much as 100 feet, and then fell down on the sides of

the little crater, which could be approached within fifty feet without

any danger. As darkness set in, the spectacle was most strange. The

fiery stream found a lurid reflection in the slowly-drifting steam

cloud, which overhung it, while the red-hot stones which shot through

the cloud shone strangely beside the quiet stars in a moonless sky.

Not from the top of this cinder cone, but from its side, a couple of

hundred feet down, a stream of lava issued. At first it was not more

than a couple of feet wide, but whether from receiving accessions or

merely from the different form of slope, it got wider on its journey

down to the Atrio del Cavallo, a thousand feet below. The slope

immediately below the exit must have been near fifty, but the lava did

not flow quicker than very thick treacle would do under like

circumstances. And there were plenty of freshly cooled lava streams

about, inclined at angles far greater than those which that learned

Academician, Elie de Beaumont, declared to be possible. Naturally I

was ashamed of these impertinent lava currents, and felt inclined to

call them "Laves mousseuses." [Elie de Beaumont "is said to have

'damned himself to everlasting fame' by inventing the nickname of 'la

science moussante' for Evolutionism." See "Life of Darwin" 2 185.]

Courage, my friend, behold land! I know you love my handwriting. I am

off to Rome to-day, and this day-week, if all goes well, I shall be

under my own roof-tree again. In fact I hope to reach London on

Saturday evening. It will be jolly to see your face again.

Ever yours faithfully,

T.H. Huxley.

My best remembrances to Hirst if you see him before I do.

[My father reached home on April 6, sunburnt and bearded almost beyond

recognition, but not really well, for as soon as he began work again

in London, his old enemy returned. Early hours, the avoidance of

society and societies, an hour's riding before starting at nine for

South Kensington, were all useless; the whole year was poisoned until

a special diet prescribed by Dr. (afterwards sir) Andrew Clark,

followed by another trip abroad, effected a cure. I remember his

saying once that he learned by sad experience that such a holiday as

that in Egypt was no good for him. What he really required was

mountain air and plenty of exercise. The following letters fill up the

outline of this period:--]

26 Abbey Place, May 20, 1872.

My dear Dohrn,

I suppose that you are now back in Naples, perambulating the Chiaja,

and looking ruefully on the accumulation of ashes on the foundations

of the aquarium! The papers, at any rate, tell us that the ashes of

Vesuvius have fallen abundantly at Naples. Moreover, that abominable

municipality is sure to have made the eruption an excuse for all sorts

of delays. May the gods give you an extra share of temper and

patience!

What an unlucky dog our poor Ray is, to go and get fever when of all

times in the world's history he should not have had it. However, I

hear he is better and on his way home. I hope he will be well enough

when he returns not only to get his Fellowship, but to help me in my

schoolmaster work in June and July.

I was greatly disgusted to miss you in Naples, but it was something to

find your father instead. What a vigorous, genial YOUNGSTER of three

score and ten he is. I declare I felt quite aged beside him. We had a

glorious day on Vesuvius, and behaved very badly by leaving him at the

inn for I do not know how many hours, while we wandered about the

cone. But he had a very charming young lady for companion, and

possibly had the best of it. I am very sorry that at the last I went

off in a hurry without saying "Good-bye" to him, but I desired

Lankester to explain, and I am sure he will have sympathised with my

anxiety to see Rome.

I returned, thinking myself very well, but a bad fit of dyspepsia

seized me, and I found myself obliged to be very idle and very careful

of myself--neither of which things are to my taste. But I am right

again now, and hope to have no more backslidings. However, I am afraid

I may not be able to attend the Brighton meeting. In which case you

will have to pay us a visit, wherever we may be--where, we have not

yet made up our minds, but it will not be so far as St. Andrews.

Now for a piece of business. The new Governor of Ceylon is a friend of

mine, and is proposing to set up a Natural History Museum in Ceylon.

He wants a curator--some vigorous fellow with plenty of knowledge and

power of organisation who will make use of his great opportunities. He

tells me he thinks he can start him with 350 pounds sterling a year

(and a house) with possible increase to 400 pounds sterling. I do not

know any one here who would answer the purpose. Can you recommend me

any one? If you can, let me know at once, and don't take so long in

writing to me as I have been in writing to you.

I await the "Prophecies of the Holy Antonius" anxiously. [His work on

the development of the Arthropoda or Spider family.] Like the Jews of

old, I come of an unbelieving generation, and need a sign. The bread

and the oil, also the chamber in the wall shall not fail the prophet

when he comes in August: nor Donner and Blitzes either.

I leave the rest of the space for the wife.

Ever yours,

T.H. Huxley.

[The following is in reply to a jest of Dr. Dohrn's--who was still a

bachelor--upon a friend's unusual sort of offering to a young lady.]

I suspected the love affair you speak of, and thought the young damsel

very attractive. I suppose it will come to nothing, even if he be

disposed to add his hand to the iron and quinine, in the next present

he offers...and, oh my Diogenes, happy in a tub of arthropodous

Entwickelungsgeschichte [History of Development.], despise not

beefsteaks, nor wives either. They also are good.

Jermyn Street, June 5, 1872.

My dear Dohrn,

I have written to the Governor of Ceylon, and enclosed the first half

of your letter to me to him as he understands High Dutch. I have told

him that the best thing he can do is to write to you at Naples and

tell you he will be very happy to see you as soon as you can come. And

that if you do come you will give him the best possible advice about

his museum, and let him have no rest until he has given you a site for

a zoological station.

I have no doubt you will get a letter from him in three weeks or so.

His name is Gregory, and you will find him a good-humoured acute man

of the world, with a very great general interest in scientific and

artistic matters. Indeed in art I believe he is a considerable

connoisseur.

I am very grieved to hear of your father's serious illness. At his age

cerebral attacks are serious, and when we spent so many pleasant hours

together at Naples, he seemed to have an endless store of vigour--very

much like his son Anton.

What put it into your head that I had any doubt of your power of work?

I am ready to believe that you are Hydra in the matter of heads and

Briareus in the matter of hands.

...If you go to Ceylon I shall expect you to come back by way of

England. It's the shortest route anywhere from India, though it may

not look so on the map.

How am I? Oh, getting along and just keeping the devil of dyspepsia at

arm's length. The wife and other members of the H.F. are well, and

would send you greetings if they knew I was writing to you.

Ever yours faithfully,

T.H. Huxley.

[A little later Von Willemoes Suhm] ("why the deuce does he have such

a long name, instead of a handy monosyllable are dissyllable like

Dohrn or Huxley?") [was recommended for the post. He afterwards was

one of the scientific staff of the "Challenger," and died during the

voyage.]

Morthoe, near Barnstaple, North Devon, August 5, 1872.

My dear Dohrn,

I trust you have not been very wroth with me for my long delay in

answering your last letter. For the last six weeks I have been very

busy lecturing daily to a batch of schoolmasters, and looking after

their practical instruction in the laboratory which the Government

has, at last, given me. In the "intervals of business" I have been

taking my share in a battle which has been raging between my friend

Hooker of Kew and his official chief...and moreover I have just had

strength enough to get my daily work done and no more, and everything

that could be put off has gone to the wall. Three days ago, the "Happy

Family," bag and baggage, came to this remote corner, where I propose

to take a couple of months' entire rest--and put myself in order for

next winter's campaign. It is a little village five miles from the

nearest town (which is Ilfracombe), and our house is at the head of a

ravine running down to the sea. Our backs are turned to England and

our faces to America with no land that I know of between. The country

about is beautiful, and if you will come we will put you up at the

little inn, and show you something better than even Swanage. There are

slight difficulties about the commissariat, but that is the Hausfrau's

business, and not mine. At the worst, bread, eggs, milk, and rabbits

are certain, and the post from London takes two days!

Morthoe, Ilfracombe, North Devon, August 23, 1872.

My dear Whirlwind,

I promise you all my books, past, present, and to come for the

Aquarium. The best part about them is that they will not take up much

room. Ask for Owen's by all means; "Fas est etiam ab hoste doceri." I

am very glad you have got the British Association publications, as it

will be a good precedent for the Royal Society.

Have you talked to Hooker about marine botany? He may be able to help

you as soon as X. the accursed (may jackasses sit upon his

grandmother's grave, as we say in the East) leaves him alone.

It is hateful that you should be in England without seeing us, and for

the first time I lament coming here. The children howled in chorus

when they heard that you could not come. At this moment the whole

tribe and their mother have gone to the sea, and I must answer your

letter before the post goes out, which it does here about half an hour

after it comes in.

Ever yours very faithfully,

T.H. Huxley.

[In 1872 Huxley was at length enabled to establish in his regular

classes a system of science teaching based upon laboratory work by the

students, which he had long felt to be the only true method. It

involved the verification of every fact by each student, and was a

training in scientific method even more than in scientific fact. Had

circumstances only permitted, the new epoch in biological teaching

might have been antedated by many years. But, as he says in the

preface to the "Practical Biology," 1875:--]

Practical work was forbidden by the limitations of space in the

building in Jermyn Street, which possessed no room applicable to the

purpose of a laboratory, and I was obliged to content myself, for many

years, with what seemed the next best thing, namely, as full an

exposition as I could give of the characters of certain plants and

animals, selected as types of vegetable and animal organisation, by

way of introduction to systematic zoology and paleontology.

[There was no laboratory work, but he would show an experiment or a

dissection during the lecture or perhaps for a few minutes after, when

the audience crowded round the lecture table.

The opportunity came in 1871. As he afterwards impressed upon the

great city companies in regard to technical education, the teaching of

science throughout the country turned upon the supply of trained

teachers. The part to be played by elementary science under the

Education Act of 1870, added urgency to the question of proper

teaching. With this in view, he organised a course of instruction for

those who had been preparing pupils for the examinations of the

Science and Art Department, "scientific missionaries," as he described

them to Dr. Dohrn.

In the promotion of the practical teaching of biology (writes the late

Jeffery Parker, "Natural Science" 8 49), Huxley's services can hardly

be overestimated. Botanists had always been in the habit of

distributing flowers to their students, which they could dissect or

not as they chose; animal histology was taught in many colleges under

the name of practical physiology; and at Oxford an excellent system of

zoological work had been established by the late Professor Rolleston.

("Rolleston (Professor Lankester writes to me) was the first to

systematically conduct the study of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy in

this country by making use of a carefully selected series of animals.

His 'types' were the Rat, the Common Pigeon, the Frog, the Perch, the

Crayfish, Blackbeetle, Anodon, Snail, Earthworm, Leech, Tapeworm. He

had a series of dissections of these mounted, also loose dissections

and elaborate manuscript descriptions. The student went through this

series, dissecting fresh specimens for himself. After some ten years'

experience Rolleston printed his manuscript directions and notes as a

book, called 'Forms of Animal Life.'

"This all preceded the practical class at South Kensington in 1871. I

have no doubt that Rolleston was influenced in his plan by your

father's advice. But Rolleston had the earlier opportunity of putting

the method into practice.

"Your father's series of types were chosen so as to include plants,

and he gave more attention to microscopic forms and to microscopic

structure than did Rolleston."

It was distinctive of the lectures that they were on biology, on

plants as well as animals, to illustrate all the fundamental features

of living things.)

But the biological laboratory, as it is now understood, may be said to

date from about 1870, when Huxley, with the cooperation of Professors

Foster, Rutherford, Lankester, Martin, and others (T.J. Parker, G.B.

Howes, and the present Sir W. Thiselton Dyer, K.C.M.G., C.I.E.,), held

short summer classes for science teachers at South Kensington, the

daily work consisting of an hour's lecture followed by four hours'

laboratory work, in which the students verified for themselves facts

which they had hitherto heard about and taught to their unfortunate

pupils from books alone. The naive astonishment and delight of the

more intelligent among them was sometimes almost pathetic. One

clergyman, who had for years conducted classes in physiology under the

Science and Art Department, was shown a drop of his own blood under

the microscope. "Dear me!" he exclaimed, "it's just like the picture

in Huxley's 'Physiology.'"

Later, in 1872, when the biological department of the Royal School of

Mines was transferred to South Kensington, this method was adopted as

part of the regular curriculum of the school, and from that time the

teaching "of zoology by lectures alone became an anachronism."

The first of these courses to schoolmasters took place, as has been

said, in 1871. Some large rooms on the ground floor of the South

Kensington Museum were used for the purpose. There was no proper

laboratory, but professor and demonstrators rigged up everything as

wanted. Huxley was in the full tide of that more than natural energy

which preceded his breakdown in health, and gave what Professor Ray

Lankester describes as "a wonderful course of lectures," one every day

from ten to eleven for six weeks, in June and half July. The three

demonstrators (those named first on the list above) each took a third

of the class, about thirty-five apiece. "Great enthusiasm prevailed.

We went over a number of plants and of animals--including microscopic

work and some physiological experiment. The 'types' were more numerous

than in later courses."

In 1872 the new laboratory--the present one--was ready.] "I have a

laboratory," [writes Huxley to Dohrn,] "which it shall do your eyes

good to behold when you come back from Ceylon, the short way." [(i.e.

via England.) here a similar course, under the same demonstrators,

assisted by H.N. Martin, was given in the summer, Huxley, though very

shaky in health, making a point of carrying them out himself.]

26 Abbey Place, June 4, 1872.

My dear Tyndall,

I MUST be at work on examination papers all day to-day, but to-morrow

I am good to lunch with you (and abscond from the Royal Commission,

which will get on very well without me) or to go with you and call on

your friends, whichever may be most convenient.

Many thanks for all your kind and good advice about the lectures, but

I really think they will not be too much for me, and it is of the

utmost importance I should carry them on.

They are the commencement of a new system of teaching which, if I

mistake not, will grow into a big thing and bear great fruit, and just

at this present moment (nobody is necessary very long) I am the

necessary man to carry it on. I could not get a suppleant if I would,

and you are no more the man than I am to let a pet scheme fall through

for the fear of a little risk of self. And really and truly I find

that by taking care I pull along very well. Moreover, it isn't my

brains that get wrong, but only my confounded stomach.

I have read your memorial [In the affair of Dr. Hooker already

referred to.] which is very strong and striking, but a difficulty

occurs to me about a good deal of it, and that is that it won't do to

quote Hooker's official letters before they have been called for in

Parliament, or otherwise made public. We should find ourselves in the

wrong officially, I am afraid, by doing so. However we can discuss

this when we meet. I will be at the Athenaeum at 4 o'clock.

Ever yours faithfully,

T.H. Huxley.

[As for the teaching by "types," which was the most salient feature of

his method, and therefore the most easily applied and misapplied,

Professor Parker continues:--

Huxley's method of teaching was based upon the personal examination by

the student of certain "types" of animals and plants selected with a

view of illustrating the various groups. But, in his lectures, these

types were not treated as the isolated things they necessarily appear

in a laboratory manual or an examination syllabus; each, on the

contrary, took its proper place as an example of a particular grade of

structure, and no student of ordinary intelligence could fail to see

that the types were valuable, not for themselves, but simply as

marking, so to speak, the chapters of a connected narrative. Moreover,

in addition to the types, a good deal of work of a more general

character was done. Thus, while we owe to Huxley more than to any one

else the modern system of teaching biology, he is by no means

responsible for the somewhat arid and mechanical aspect it has assumed

in certain quarters.

The application of the same system to botanical teaching was

inaugurated in 1873, when, being compelled to go abroad for his

health, he arranged that Mr. (now Sir W.) Thiselton Dyer should take

his place and lecture on Botany.

The "Elementary Instruction in Biology," published in 1875, was a

text-book based upon this system. This book, in writing which Huxley

was assisted by his demonstrator, H.N. Martin, was reprinted thirteen

times before 1888, when it was "Revised and Extended by Howes and

Scott," his later assistants. The revised edition is marked by one

radical change, due to the insistence of his demonstrator, the late

Professor Jeffery Parker. In the first edition, the lower forms of

life were first dealt with; from simple cells--amoeba, yeast-plant,

blood-corpuscle--the student was taken through an ascending series of

plants and of animals, ending with the frog or rabbit. But] "the

experience of the Lecture-room and the Laboratory taught me," [writes

Huxley in the new preface,] "that philosophical as it might be in

theory, it had defects in practice." [The process might be regarded as

not following the scientific rule of proceeding from the known to the

unknown; while the small and simple organisms required a skill in

handling high-power microscopes which was difficult for beginners to

acquire. Hence the course was reversed, and began with the more

familiar type of the rabbit or frog. This was Rolleston's practice;

but it may be noted that Professor Ray Lankester has always maintained

and further developed "the original Huxleian plan of beginning with

the same microscopic forms" as being a most important philosophic

improvement on Rolleston's plan, and giving, he considers, "the truer

'twist,' as it were, to a student's mind."

When the book was sent to Darwin, he wrote back (November 12, 1875):--

My dear Huxley,

Many thanks for your biology, which I have read. It was a real stroke

of genius to think of such a plan. Lord, how I wish that I had gone

through such a course.

Ever yours,

Charles Darwin.

A large portion of his time and energy was occupied in the

organisation of this course of teaching for teachers, and its

elaboration before being launched on a larger scale in October, when

the Biological Department of the Jermyn Street school was transferred

to the new buildings at South Kensington, fitted with laboratories

which were to excite his friend Dr. Dohrn's envy. But he was also at

work upon his share of the "Science Primers," so far as his still

uncertain health allowed. This and the affairs of the British

Association are the subject of several letters to Sir Henry Roscoe and

Dr. Tyndall.]

26 Abbey Place, April 8, 1872.

My dear Roscoe,

Many thanks for your kind letter of welcome. My long rest has

completely restored me. As my doctor told me, I was sound, wind and

limb, and had merely worn myself out. I am not going to do that again,

and you see that I have got rid of the School Board. It was an awful

incubus!

Oddly enough I met the Ashtons in the Vatican, and heard about your

perplexities touching Oxford. I should have advised you to do as you

have done. I think that you have a great piece of work to do at Owens

College, and that you will do it. If you had gone to Oxford you would

have sacrificed all the momentum you have gained in Manchester; and

would have had to begin de novo, among conditions which, I imagine, it

is very hard for a non-University man to appreciate and adjust himself

to.

I like the look of the "Primers" (of which Macmillan has sent me

copies to-day) very much, and shall buckle to at mine as soon as

possible. I am very glad you did not wait for me. I remained in a very

shaky condition up to the middle of March, and could do nothing.

Ever yours very faithfully,

T.H. Huxley.

The wife unites with me in kind regards to Mrs. Roscoe and yourself.

Morthoe, Ilfracombe, North Devon, September 9, 1872.

My dear Tyndall,

I was very glad to have news of you, and to hear that you are

vigorous.

My outing hitherto has not been very successful, so far as the inward

man is concerned at least, for the weather has been good enough. But I

have been worried to death with dyspepsia and the hyperchondriacal

bedevilments that follow in its train, until I am seriously thinking

of returning to town to see if the fine air of St. John's Wood (as the

man says in "Punch") won't enable me to recover from the effects of

the country.

I wish I were going with you to Yankee Land, not to do any lecturing,

God forbid! but to be a quiet spectator in a corner of the

enthusiastic audiences. I am as lazy as a dog, and the role of

looker-on would just suit me. However, I have a good piece of work to

do in organising my new work at South Kensington.

I have just asked my children what message they have to send to you,

and they send their love; very sorry they won't see you before you go,

and hope you won't come back speaking through your nose!

I shall be in town this week or next, and therefore shall see you.

Ever yours faithfully,

T.H. Huxley.

26 Abbey Place, September 17, 1872.

My dear Roscoe,

Your letter has followed me from Morthoe here. We had good enough

weather in Devon--but my stay there was marred by the continuous

dyspepsia and concurrent hyperchondriacal incapacity. At last, I could

not stand it any longer, and came home for "change of air," leaving

the wife and chicks to follow next week. By dint of living on cocoa

and Revalenta, and giving up drink, tobacco, and all other things that

make existence pleasant, I am getting better.

What was your motive in getting kicked by a horse? I stopped away from

the Association without that; and am not sorry to have been out of the

way of the X. business. What is to become of the association if -- is

to monopolise it? And then there was that scoundrel, Louis

Napoleon--to whom no honest man ought to speak--gracing the scene. I

am right glad I was out of it.

I am at my wits' end to suggest a lecturer for you. I wish I could

offer myself, but I have refused everything of that sort on the score

of health; and moreover, I am afraid of my wife!

What do you say to Ramsay? He lectures very well. I have done nothing

whatever to the Primer. Stewart sent me Geikie's letter this morning,

and I have asked Macmillan to send Geikie the proofs of my Primer so

far as they go. We must not overlap more than can be helped.

I have not seen Hooker yet since my return. While all this row has

been going on, I could not ask him to do anything for us. And until X.

is dead and d--d (officially at any rate), I am afraid there will be

little peace for him.

Ever yours very faithfully,

T.H. Huxley.

Please remember me very kindly to Mrs. Roscoe.

[In a letter of September 25 is a reference to the way in which his

increasing family had outgrown his house in Abbey Place. Early in the

preceding year, he had come to the decision to buy a small house in

the same neighbourhood, and add to it so as to give elbow-room to each

and all of the family. This was against the advice of his friend and

legal adviser, to whom he wrote announcing his decision, as follows.

The letter was adorned with a sketch of an absurd cottage, "Ye House!"

perched like a windmill on a kind of pedestal, and with members of the

family painfully ascending a ladder to the upper story, above the

ominous legend, "Staircase forgotten."]

March 20, 1871.

My dear Burton,

There is something delightfully refreshing in rushing into a piece of

practical work in the teeth of one's legal adviser.

If the lease of a piece of ground whereon I am going to build mine

house come to you, will you see if it's all right.

Yours wilfully,

T.H. Huxley.

[This house, Number 4 Marlborough Place, stands on the north side of

that quiet street, close to its junction with Abbey Road. It is next

door to the Presbyterian Church, on the other side of which again is a

Jewish synagogue. The irregular front of the house, with the original

cottage, white-painted and deep eaved, joined by a big porch to the

new uncompromising square face of yellow brick, distinguished only by

its extremely large windows, was screened from the road by a high oak

paling, and a well-grown row of young lime-trees. Taken as a whole, it

was not without character, and certainly was unlike most London

houses. It was built for comfort, not beauty; designed, within

stringent limits as to cost, to give each member of the family room to

get away by himself or herself if so disposed. Moreover, the gain in

space made it more possible to see something of friends or put up a

guest, than in the small and crowded house in Abbey Place.

A small garden lay in front of the house; a considerably larger garden

behind, wherein the chief ornament was then a large apple-tree, that

never failed to spread a cloud of blossom for my father's birthday,

the 4th of May.

Over the way, too, for many years we were faced by a long garden full

of blossoming pear-trees in which thrushes and blackbirds sang and

nested, belonging to a desolate house in the Abbey Road, which was

tenanted by a solitary old man, supposed to be a male prototype of

Miss Havisham in "Great Expectations."

The move was accompanied by a unique and unpleasant experience. A

knavish fellow, living in a cottage close to the foot of the garden,

sought to blackmail the new comer, under threat of legal proceedings,

alleging that a catchment well for surface drainage had made his

basement damp. Unfortunately for his case, it could be shown that the

pipes had not yet been connected with the well, and when he carried

out his threat, he gained nothing from his suit in Chancery and his

subsequent appeal, except some stinging remarks from Vice-Chancellor

Malins.]

I am afraid the brute is impecunious [wrote my father after the first

suit failed], and that I shall get nothing out of him. So I shall have

had three months' worry, and be fined 100 pounds sterling or so for

being wholly and absolutely in the right.

[Happily the man turned out to have enough means to pay the bulk of

the costs; but that was no compensation for the mental worry and

consequent ill-health entailed from November to June.

The only amusing point in the whole affair was when the plaintiff's

solicitors had the face to file an affidavit before the

Vice-Chancellor himself in answer to his strictures upon the case,

"about as regular a proceeding," reports Mr. Burton, "as for a middy

to reply upon the Post Captain on his own quarter-deck."

The move was made in the third week of December (1872) amid endless

rain and mud and with workmen still in the house. It was attended by

one inconvenience. He writes to Darwin on December 20, 1872:--]

I am utterly disgusted at having only just received your note of

Tuesday. But the fact is, there is a certain inconvenience about

having FOUR addresses as has been my case for the most part of this

week, in consequence of our moving--and as I have not been to Jermyn

Street before to-day, I have missed your note. I should run round to

Queen Anne Street now on the chance of catching you, but I am bound

here by an appointment.

[One incident of the move, however, was more agreeable. Mr. Herbert

Spencer took the opportunity of sending a New Year's gift for the new

house, in the shape of a handsome clock, wishing, as he said, "to

express in some way more empathic than by words, my sense of the many

kindnesses I have received at your hands during the twenty years of

our friendship. Remembrance of the things you have done in furtherance

of my aims, and of the invaluable critical aid you have given me, with

so much patience and at so much cost of time, has often made me feel

how much I owe you."

After a generous reference to occasions when the warmth of debate

might have betrayed him into more vigorous expressions than he

intended, he concludes:--

But inadequately as I may ordinarily show it, you will (knowing that I

am tolerably candid) believe me when I say that there is no one whose

judgment on all subjects I so much respect, or whose friendship I so

highly value.

It may be remembered that the 1872 address on "Administrative

Nihilism" led to a reply from the pen of Mr. Spencer, as the champion

of Individualism. When my father sent him the volume in which this

address was printed, he wrote back a letter (September 29, 1873) which

is characterised by the same feeling. It expresses his thanks for the

book, "and many more for the kind expression of feeling in the

preface. If you had intended to set an example to the Philistines of

the way in which controversial differences may be maintained without

any decrease of sympathy, you could not have done it more perfectly."

In connection with the building of the house, Tyndall had advanced a

sum of money to his friend, and with his usual generosity, not only

received interest with the greatest reluctance, but would have liked

to make a gift of the principal. He writes, "If I remain a bachelor I

will circumvent you--if not--not. It cleaves to me like dirt--and that

is why you wish to get rid of it." To this he received answer:--

February 26, 1873.

I am not to be deterred by any amount of bribery and corruption, from

bringing you under the yoke of a "rare and radiant,"--whenever I

discover one competent to undertake the ticklish business of governing

you. I hope she will be "radiant,"--uncommonly "rare" she certainly

will be!

Two years later this loan was paid off, with the following letter:--]

4 Marlborough Place, January 11, 1875.

My dear old Shylock,

My argosies have come in, and here is all that was written in the

bond! If you want the pound of flesh too, you know it is at your

service, and my Portia won't raise that pettifogging objection to

shedding a little blood into the bargain, which that other one did.

Ever yours faithfully,

T.H. Huxley.

[On October 24 Miss Jex Blake wrote to him to ask his help for herself

and the other women medical students at Edinburgh. For two years they

had only been able to get anatomical teaching in a mixed class; but

wishing to have a separate class, at least for the present, they had

tried to arrange for one that session. The late demonstrator at the

Surgeons' Hall, who had given them most of their teaching before, had

undertaken to teach this separate class, but was refused recognition

by the University Court, on the ground that they had no evidence of

his qualifications, while refusing to let him prove his qualification

by examination. This the women students understood to be an indirect

means of suppressing their aspirations; they therefore begged Huxley

to examine their instructor with a view to giving him a certificate

which should carry weight with the University Court.

He replied:--]

To Miss Jex Blake.

October 28, 1872.

Dear Madam,

While I fully sympathise with the efforts made by yourself and others,

to obtain for women the education requisite to qualify them for

medical practice, and while I think that women who have the

inclination and the capacity to follow the profession of medicine are

most unjustly dealt with if any obstacles beyond those which are

natural and inevitable are placed in their way, I must nevertheless

add, that I as completely sympathise with those Professors of Anatomy,

Physiology, and Obstetrics, who object to teach such subjects to mixed

classes of young men and women brought together without any further

evidence of moral and mental fitness for such association than the

payment of their fees.

In fact, with rare exceptions, I have refused to admit women to my own

Lectures on Comparative Anatomy for many years past. But I should not

hesitate to teach anything I know to a class composed of women; and I

find it hard to believe that any one should really wish to prevent

women from obtaining efficient separate instruction, and from being

admitted to Examination for degrees upon the same terms as men.

You will therefore understand that I should be most glad to help you

if I could--and it is with great regret that I feel myself compelled

to refuse your request to examine Mr. H--.

In the first place I am in the midst of my own teaching, and with

health not yet completely re-established I am obliged to keep clear of

all unnecessary work. Secondly, such an examination must be practical,

and I have neither dissecting-room available nor the anatomical

license required for human dissection; and thirdly, it is not likely

that the University authorities would attach much weight to my report

on one or two days' work--if the fact that Mr. H-- has already filled

the office of anatomical Demonstrator (as I understand from you) does

not satisfy them as to his competency.

I am, dear Madam, yours very faithfully,

T.H. Huxley.

[The last event of the year was that he was elected by the students

Lord Rector of Aberdeen University--a position, the duties of which

consist partly in attending certain meetings of the University Court,

but more especially in delivering an address. This, however, was not

required for another twelvemonth, and the address on "Universities,

Actual and Ideal," was delivered in fulfilment of this duty in

February 1874.

Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley — Volume 2 · 第 23 / 41 章