PORTSMOUTH, JAN. 15, 1811.

_Rev. Sir_,--Yours of the 11th inst. is before me, and according to my

_promise_ I hasten to pay _an early attention_ to its contents,

notwithstanding you express a _hope_ that I should write to you no

more on this subject. In your desire, sir, that I should write no more

I believe you to be _really sincere_, for I believe you to be a man

disposed to give your friends as little trouble as possible; but I

have several reasons for answering your last, which, when I have

stated, I presume, will fully satisfy you that my answer is required

in justice to myself.

1st. I find myself accused of _baseness_, of which, were I guilty, the

forfeiture would be that of _confidence_.

2d. I find my preaching misrepresented, and that in direct violation

of my own declaration in the present correspondence.

3d. I find questions proposed for my discussion, which renders it

reasonable that you should have an answer, as I was in hopes of

obtaining to the questions which I stated to you.

4th. I find you quite off from the subjects of your admonitions, not

attempting to support them, nor yet willing to exonerate me from

charges.

5th. I find the scriptures of our blessed Lord and Saviour quoted with

a manifest design to limit his grace and salvation.

I might go on and state a number more reasons why I conceive it to be

my duty to reply, but the five already given will undoubtedly satisfy

your mind; and they furnish subjects sufficiently ample for an

epistle. To them I shall conform myself, and endeavour to be as

concise as is consistent with the importance of the subject.

A Series of Letters, in Defence of Divine Revelation In Reply to Rev. Abner Kneeland's Serious Inquiry into the Authenticity of the Same. To Which is Added, a Religious Correspondence, Between the Rev. Hosea Ballou, and the Rev. Dr. Joseph Buckminster and Rev. Joseph Walton, Pastors of Congregational Churches in Portsmouth, N. H. · 第 64 / 70 题