CHAPTER VIII.

THE STRUGGLES OF DIPLOMACY.

1830

Birth of the Duke of Bordeaux, now called Count de Chambord.--Henry

V. and the Regency.--Strength of the Republicans.--Arguments of the

Orleanists.--Embarrassment of Louis Philippe.--Indecision.--The

pressure of events.--Interview between the baron and the banker.--Plan

of the Legitimists.--Anxiety of Lafayette.--Danger of

anarchy.--Orleanist proclamation.--Activity of the

Legitimists.--Attempts at compromise.--Fears of the

Orleanists.--Singular interview.--Agitation of the ducal

family.--Strange crisis of affairs.--Appalling rumor.--The ultra

Democrats.--The demand for a plebiscite.--Tumultuous

scenes.--Resolutions passed by the Republicans.--Arrogance of the

Polytechnic pupils.--Increasing anxiety and peril.--The panic.--Two

imperialists.--Testimony of Louis Blanc.--The Empire.--The mob at

Neuilly.--The duke visits Paris.--Scene in the Palais Royal.--Advice

of Talleyrand.--Proclamation of Louis Philippe.

Upon the sudden overthrow of the throne of Charles X. by a revolution

in the streets of Paris, four parties appeared, struggling for the

crown. Charles, as he fled with his court in terror from France,

threw back a decree of abdication in favor of his grandson, the Count

de Chambord, then entitled the Duke de Bordeaux. This child, who

still lives, was then about ten years old. The birth of this child,

whom the Legitimists call Henry V., and whom they regard as the

legitimate heir to the ancient throne of the Bourbons, was hailed

with rejoicing throughout France.

It is recorded that quite a dramatic scene occurred at his birth. His

grandfather, Charles X., hastened to the chamber, and, seizing the

new-born babe in his arms, exclaimed, with delight, "Here is a fine

Duke de Bordeaux! He is born for us all!" He then gave the child a

few drops of the wine of Pau, with which tradition says that the

aged father of Jeanne d'Albret anointed the lips of her child, Henry

IV., before the babe was allowed to place his mouth to his mother's

breast.

The heroic mother of the young duke, the Duchess de Berri, whose

subsequent fate was so deplorable, said to the king, the father of

her departed husband, "Sire, I wish I knew the song of Jeanne

d'Albret, that every thing might be done here as at the birth of

Henry IV."

The advocates of the ancient _regime_, the Legitimist party, many of

them illustrious in rank and intellect, rallied around the banner of

young Henry, the Duke of Bordeaux. They probably had the sympathies

of those European dynasties which, by force of arms, had replaced the

Bourbons upon that throne of France from which the Revolution of 1789

had expelled them. In accordance with the decree of abdication which

Charles X. had issued, the Legitimists wished the young Duke of

Bordeaux to be recognized as sovereign, with the title of Henry V,;

and the Duke of Orleans, Louis Philippe, to be accepted as regent,

during the minority of the child.

Next came the Republican party, formidable in physical strength, in

Paris and in other cities. The Republicans had roused the masses,

filling the streets with a hundred thousand armed workmen; they had

inspired the conflict, demolished the throne, achieved the

revolution; but they had no leader capable of organizing and

controlling the tumultuous populace. The moneyed men, remembering the

Reign of Terror, were afraid of them. All through the rural

districts, the peasantry, influenced by the priests, could not endure

the idea of a republic.

The bankers in Paris, the moneyed class, men of large resources and

influence, were the leaders of the third, or Orleans party, so

called. These men were opposed to the aristocracy of rank, but were

in favor of the aristocracy of wealth. They had ample means and very

able leaders. They wished for a constitutional monarchy, modelled

after the aristocratic institutions of England. They would place upon

the throne the Duke of Orleans, a Bourbon, one of the richest nobles

in Europe. He would be the legitimate heir to the throne should the

young Duke of Bordeaux die. The Duke of Orleans, with his vast

wealth, would be the fitting representative of the moneyed class.

The Orleanists could very effectually appeal to the moderate men of

the Legitimist and Republican parties in favor of a compromise in the

interest of the Duke of Orleans. To the first they said:

"Unless you accept the Duke of Orleans, there is danger that the

Republicans will gain the ascendency, and then our time-honored

monarchy will be overthrown." To the Republicans they said: "Unless

you consent to this compromise, which gives us a constitutional

monarchy, under a _citizen king_, there is danger that another

coalition of the powers of Europe will inundate France, and, after

years of blood and woe, the old _regime_ of the Bourbons will be

again forced upon us."

In speaking to the Republicans, they emphasized the declaration that

Louis Philippe would be a _citizen king_. When speaking to the

Legitimists, they laid stress upon the fact that the Duke of Orleans

would be the _legitimate_ sovereign, should the frail child die who

alone stood between him and the throne.

There was a fourth party--the Imperial or Napoleonist. It existed

then in rather a latent state, though in a condition to be roused, as

subsequent events proved, to marvellous life by an electric touch.

The renown of the great emperor filled the land. The memorials of his

reign were everywhere. He was enthroned in the hearts of the French

people, as monarch was never enthroned before. But the Bourbons had

taken especial care to banish from France every one who bore his

name, and to obliterate, as far as possible, every memorial of his

wonderful reign. The revolution had burst upon Paris with almost the

suddenness of the lightning's flash. There was no one there who could

speak in behalf of the descendants of him who had so lately filled

the world with his renown, and who was still enshrined, with almost

idolatrous worship, in so many hearts.

From the above it will be perceived that the chances were greatly in

favor of the Orleans party. Louis Philippe was placed in perhaps as

embarrassing and painful a position as man ever occupied. He was far

advanced in life, with property amounting, it is said, to about one

hundred millions of dollars. Revolutionary storms had, at one time,

driven him into the extreme of poverty. He had experienced the

severest sufferings of persecution and exile. Now, in his declining

years, happy amidst the splendors of the Palais Royal, and in his

magnificent retreat at Neuilly, he was anxious for repose.

Should he allow himself to be placed at the head of the obnoxious,

utterly-defeated Legitimist party, as regent during the minority of

the Duke of Bordeaux? It was scarcely possible that he could maintain

his position. Republicans, Orleanists, and Imperialists, all would

combine against him. The army could not be relied upon to sustain

him. Ruin seemed inevitable--not only the confiscation of his

property, but probably also the loss of his head.

Should he allow himself to be made king by the bankers in Paris? He

would be an usurper; false to his own principles of legitimacy, to

those principles which had brought him into sympathy with the allied

dynasties of Europe in those long and bloody wars by which they had

forced rejected legitimacy back upon France.

The little Duke of Bordeaux and his grandfather, Charles X., were his

near blood relatives. He had received from the royal family great

favors--the restoration of his vast domains. He would be morally

guilty of the greatest ingratitude in assuming the attitude of their

antagonist, interposing himself between the lawful heir and the

crown. Should he stand aloof from these agitations, and take no part

in the movement of affairs, then anarchy or a Republic seemed the

inevitable result. In either case, he, as a rich Bourbon, with an

amount of wealth which endangered the state, would be driven from

France and his property confiscated.

But affairs pressed. Scarcely a moment could be allowed for

deliberation. The crisis demanded prompt and decisive action. The

embarrassment of the duke is painfully conspicuous in the interviews

which ensued. Anxiously he paced the floor of his library at Neuilly,

bewildered and vacillating.

There was a rich banker at Paris by the name of Lafitte. He called a

meeting at his house, of Guizot, Thiers, and other leading

journalists. There they decided to unite upon the Duke of Orleans,

and to combine immediately, without a moment's delay, all possible

influences in Paris, to place the sceptre of power in his hands,

before the dreaded Republicans should have the opportunity to grasp

it. It was the 30th of July, the last of the three days' conflict.

The thunders of the battle had scarcely ceased to echo through the

streets of the metropolis.

Baron Glandeves, governor of the Tuileries, and of course a warm

partisan of Charles X., who had probably heard a rumor of this

meeting, called upon M. Lafitte, and the following conversation is

reported as having taken place between them:

"Sir," said the baron to the banker, "you have now been master of

Paris for twenty-four hours. Do you wish to save the monarchy?"

"Which monarchy?" inquired Lafitte, "the monarchy of 1789, or the

constitutional monarchy of 1814?"

"The constitutional monarchy," the baron replied.

"To save it," rejoined Lafitte, "only one course remains; and that is

to crown the Duke of Orleans."

"The Duke of Orleans!" exclaimed the baron, "what are his titles to

the crown? That boy, the son of Napoleon, whom Vienna has educated,

can at least invoke the memory of his father's glory. It must be

admitted that Napoleon has written his annals in characters of fire

upon the minds of men. But the Duke of Orleans--what prestige

surrounds him? What has he done? How many of the people know his

history, or have even heard his name?"

"In the fact of his want of renown," replied the banker, "I see a

recommendation. Having no influence over the imagination, he will be

the less able to break away from the restraints of a constitutional

monarch. His private life is irreproachable. He has respected himself

in his wife, and has caused himself to be revered and loved by his

children."

"Mere domestic virtues," rejoined M. Glandeves, "are not to be

recompensed by a crown. Are you ignorant that he is accused of

approving of the vote of his father for the death of Louis XVI.; that

in our dark days he associated himself with projects to exclude

forever from the throne the legitimate heirs; that during the Hundred

Days he preserved a mysterious inaction; that, since 1815, while

pretending to be the humble servant of the court, he has been the

secret fomenter of all intrigues? Louis XVIII. restored to him his

vast estates. Charles X., by a personal request to the Chambers,

secured them to him, by legal and irrefragable rights, and conferred

upon him the title of royal highness, which he so long coveted. How

can he now, thus burdened with kindnesses from the elder branch of

the Bourbons, seize upon their inheritance?"

"It is not for the personal interest of the duke," replied M.

Lafitte, "that we wish to place him upon the throne, but for the

salvation of the country. This alone can save us from anarchy, which

otherwise seems inevitable. I do not ask whether the situation of the

Duke of Orleans is painful to his feelings, but simply whether his

accession to the throne is desirable for France. What prince is more

liberal in his political sentiments, or more free from those

prejudices which have ruined Charles X.? And where can we find any

candidate for the throne who combines so many advantages? And what

course can you propose preferable to that of placing the crown on his

head?"

"If you believe Charles X. guilty," rejoined the baron, "at least you

will admit that the Duke de Bordeaux is innocent. Let us preserve the

crown for him. He will be trained up in good principles. Does

Lafayette very sincerely desire a Republic?"

"He would wish for it," Lafitte replied, "if he were not afraid of

too searching a convulsion."

"Well, then," said the baron, "let a council of regency be

established. You would take part in it with Lafayette."

M. Lafitte replied, "Yesterday that might have been possible; and,

had the Duchess de Berri--separating her cause from that of the old

king--presented herself, with her young son, holding a tri-color in

her hand--"

"A tri-color!" exclaimed the baron, in astonishment, interrupting

him--"A tri-color! Why, it is, in their eyes, the symbol of every

crime. Rather than adopt it, they would suffer themselves to be

brayed in a mortar."

"Under these circumstances," inquired Lafitte, "what is it you have

to propose to me?"

The prompt reply was, "Respect the divine right of the Duke of

Bordeaux--proclaim him sovereign, as Henry V.--intrust the regency,

during his minority, to the Duke of Orleans."

This was the plan of the Legitimists. Talleyrand also cherished the

same view. The Republicans were by no means inclined to enthrone

another Bourbon in the place of Charles X. When M. Thiers and M.

Mignet, with others from the office of the _Nationale_, appeared

among the crowd distributing printed slips of paper eulogizing the

Duke of Orleans, they were received with hisses. When it was

announced to the combatants of the Passage Dauphin that there was a

plot concocting to raise the Duke of Orleans to the throne, there was

one unanimous burst of rage, with the simultaneous exclamation, "If

that be the case, the battle is to be begun again, and we will go and

cast fresh balls. No more Bourbons: we will have none of them." M.

Leroux, who had witnessed this scene, hurried to the Hotel de Ville

to warn Lafayette of the danger. He assured Lafayette that the

Republican spirit which Lafayette had evoked now menaced Paris and

France with anarchy, and that the attempt to place another Bourbon on

the throne would be the signal of a new and terrible conflict.

Lafayette--who was seated in a large armchair--seemed, for a moment,

stunned and speechless. A messenger came in to inform him that the

Duke of Chartres--the eldest son of the Duke of Orleans--had been

taken captive, and that a riotous band was surging through the

streets shouting, "A prince is taken! Let us go and shoot him!"

Almost by miracle the young duke escaped death.

The peril of anarchy was hourly increasing. There was not a moment to

be lost in organizing, if possible, some stable government. The

millions in the rural districts would not accept a Republic organized

by the populace in Paris. The men of property, and the friends of

order generally, thought that their only chance of averting confusion

and ruin was to rally in support of the Orleans dynasty. Thus the

Orleans party rapidly increased among the more wealthy and reputable

portion of the citizens. The leading journals espoused their cause.

Nearly all the journals, trembling in view of the threatening

anarchy, earnestly rallied around that banner. Beranger, the most

popular poet in France--notwithstanding his profound admiration of

Napoleon, which was breathed forth in so many of his soul-stirring

songs--gave the Orleanists the aid of his all-powerful pen.

The following proclamation in favor of the Duke of Orleans was

issued:

"Charles X. can never return to Paris; he has shed the blood

of the people. A Republic would expose us to horrible

divisions; it would involve us in hostilities with Europe.

The Duke of Orleans is a prince devoted to the cause of the

Revolution. The Duke of Orleans has never fought against us.

The Duke of Orleans was at Jemappes. The Duke of Orleans is a

citizen king. The Duke of Orleans has carried the tri-color

flag under the enemy's fire. The Duke of Orleans can alone

carry it again. We will have no other flag. The Duke of

Orleans does not declare himself. He waits for the expression

of our wishes. Let us proclaim those wishes and he will

accept the charter, as we have always understood and desired

it. It is from the French people he will hold the crown."

"This proclamation," says Louis Blanc, "was drawn up with great art.

It repeated the name of the Duke of Orleans again and again, in order

that this name, little known to the people, might nevertheless be

deeply imprinted on its memory. By talking of the tri-color flag and

Jemappes to a multitude who troubled themselves little about

political forms, it engaged, on behalf of the elect of the

bourgeoisie, that national feeling that had been exalted to so high a

pitch by the victories of the Republic and the Empire, Lastly, it

invoked the sovereignty of the people, the better to destroy it--an

old trick of courage-lacking ambition."

The above proclamation was placarded throughout Paris, and was

simultaneously published in the three leading journals, the

_Nationale_, the _Courier Francais_, and the _Commerce_, which were

severally edited by the distinguished journalists, Thiers, Mignet,

and Larequy. Another renowned editor, M. Carrel, was dispatched to

Rouen, to gain that important city to the Orleans cause.

In the mean time, the Legitimists, headed by Chateaubriand and

Talleyrand, were not idle. These men were not merely ambitious

partisans. It can not be doubted that they believed that the

interests of France would be best promoted by respecting the rights

of the Duke of Bordeaux, under the lieutenant-generalship of the Duke

of Orleans.

The successful insurrectionists, composed mainly of the Republican

and Democratic parties in Paris, had their head-quarters at the Hotel

de Ville. Here they hastily organized what they called a Provisional

Government. General Lafayette presided over their deliberations. The

embarrassment of affairs was such, that the illustrious marquis was

in a state of cruel anxiety. In principle he was a Republican. And

yet he could see no possibility of evolving a stable Republic from

the chaos into which the political world was then plunged. After much

deliberation, the Republican leaders at the Hotel de Ville sent

General Dubourg, as a commissioner, to the Orleanists assembled at M.

Lafitte's, to confer respecting a compromise and union of parties.

But already the Orleanists felt so strong that they refused even to

admit him to their presence.

The Orleanists were very anxious, from fear that the Duke of Orleans

might accede to the proposition of the Legitimists, and proclaim the

Duke of Bordeaux king, and himself, in accordance with the decree of

Charles X., lieutenant-general of France, and regent during the

minority of the duke. This would be in accordance with the forms of

law, and the only legal course. Such a step would give the

Legitimists immense vantage-ground, from which they could only be

driven by another bloody conflict.

To guard against this peril, it was decided to send a delegation,

consisting of M. Thiers, M. Scheffer, and M. Sebastiani, to the rural

chateau of Louis Philippe, at Neuilly, which was but a short distance

from Paris, to offer to him the crown. Should he refuse it, they

were directed to arrest him and convey him to a place of safety, and

hold him in close custody. Louis Blanc, in his "_Dix Ans de Louis

Philippe_," has given a minute account of this interview. It would

seem that Louis Philippe, in an agony of suspense, though informed of

the approach of the delegation, was not prepared to meet them. To

avoid the interview, he fled to Rancy, leaving his wife and sister

behind him.

The Duchess of Orleans received the gentlemen. Pale and trembling,

she listened to the offer of a crown to her husband. Then with

extreme emotion she replied to M. Scheffer, the speaker of the party:

"How could you undertake such a mission? That M. Thiers should have

charged himself with it, I can understand. He little knew us. But

that you, who have been admitted to our intimacy--who knew us so

well--ah! we can never forgive it."

Just then Louis Philippe's sister, Madame Adelaide, followed by

Madame de Montjoie, entered the room. Fully comprehending the object

of the mission, and the dangers which surrounded them, Madame

Adelaide said,

"Let them make my brother a president, a commander of the National

Guard, any thing, so that they do not make him a proscribed."

"Madame," responded M. Thiers, "it is a throne which we come to offer

him."

"But what," rejoined the princess, "will Europe think? Shall he seat

himself on the throne from which Louis XVI. descended to mount the

scaffold? What a panic will it strike in all royal houses! The peace

of the world will be endangered."

"These apprehensions, madame," M. Thiers replied, "are natural, but

they are not well-founded. England, full of the recollection of the

banished Stuarts, will applaud an event of which her history

furnishes an example and a model. As to the absolute monarchies, far

from reproaching the Duke of Orleans for fixing on his head a crown

floating on the storm, they will approve a step which will render his

elevation a barrier against the unchained passions of the multitude.

There is something great and worth saving in France. And if it be too

late for legitimacy, it is not for a constitutional throne. After

all, there remains to the Duke of Orleans only a choice of danger. In

the present posture of affairs, to fly from the possible dangers of

royalty is to face a Republic and its inevitable tempests."

These forcible words of the sagacious statesman produced a deep

impression upon the strong and well-balanced mind of Madame Adelaide.

She was fully capable of appreciating all their import. She gave

virtual assent to them by saying, "I am a child of Paris: I am

willing to intrust myself to the Parisians." It was decided to send

immediately for the duke. A messenger soon reached him, and he set

out on horseback, accompanied by M. Montesquiou, for Paris. Still his

irresolution, timidity, and bewilderment were so great that, before

reaching the city, his heart misgave him, and, turning his horse, he

galloped with the utmost speed back to Rancy. Alison, in depicting

these scenes, says, with a severity which our readers will probably

think that the recorded facts scarcely warrant,

"He had neither courage enough to seize the crown which was

offered to him, nor virtue enough to refuse it. He would

gladly have declined the crown if he had been sure of

retaining his estates. The most powerful argument for

accepting it was, that by so doing he could save his

property."

The strange crisis of affairs was such that, while the population of

France was over thirty millions, a few bankers in Paris, without

consulting the voice of the people, were about to impose upon them a

government and a king; and it must be admitted that the peril of the

nation was such that many of the purest and noblest men approved of

these measures. The majority of the members of the Chamber of

Deputies were gained over to this cause; and even the members of the

House of Peers were so overawed by the menacing aspect of the excited

populace, that they were disposed to fall in with the movement.

The deputies were assembled at the Hotel Bourbon, waiting to receive

the report of the delegation which had been sent to offer the crown

to Louis Philippe. It is said that there was but one man, M. Hyde de

Neuville, who occupied the benches reserved for the advocates of the

old royalty. There were probably, however, others in favor of the

Duke of Bordeaux, who absented themselves. While thus in session, the

rumor came that a body of royalist troops from Rouen were marching

upon Paris, and that their cannon were already planted upon the

heights of Montmartre, which commanded the city. In the midst of the

consternation which this communication created, the deputies returned

from Neuilly, with a report of their favorable reception by the

family of Louis Philippe.

Immediately, though with some dissenting voices, the following

resolution was adopted, and transmitted to the Duke of Orleans:

"The deputies in Paris deem it essential to implore his royal

highness the Duke of Orleans to repair immediately to Paris,

to exercise the functions of lieutenant-general of the

kingdom, and also to resume, in accordance with the universal

wish, the tri-color flag."

Meanwhile the peers had met in their hall, in the palace of the

Luxembourg. Chateaubriand was then in the plenitude of his renown as

a writer, an orator, a statesman. Crowds of young men, in admiration

of his genius, were ready enthusiastically to follow his leading.

This distinguished man fully realized the true state of affairs--the

difficulties involved in whatever course they should attempt to

pursue. For some time he sat apart, silent and melancholy, apparently

in gloomy thought. Suddenly he rose, and, in deliberate, solemn

tones, said:

"Let us protest in favor of the ancient monarchy. If needs be, let us

leave Paris. But wherever we may be driven, let us save the king, and

surrender ourselves to the trust of a courageous fidelity. If the

question come to the salvation of legitimacy, give me a pen and two

months, and I will restore the throne."

Scarcely had he concluded these bold, proud words, when a delegation

presented itself from the Chamber of Deputies, soliciting the

co-operation of the peers in placing the crown upon the brow of the

Duke of Orleans. It was soon manifest that but few of the peers were

prepared to surrender themselves to martyrdom by following the

courageous but desperate councils of Chateaubriand.

The ultra democratic party, dissatisfied with the moderate tone

assumed by Lafayette and his associates at the Hotel de Ville, formed

a new organization at a hall in the Rue St. Honore. They were bold,

determined men, ready to adopt the most audacious resolutions, and to

shed their blood like water, in street fights, to maintain them. They

were numerous, and with nervous gripe held the arms they had seized;

but they had no commander. There was not a man in their ranks who

could secure the support of a respectable party throughout France.

They had no pecuniary resources--they consisted merely of a

tumultuous band of successful insurrectionists, with no one of

sufficient character and prominence upon whom even they could unite

to recognize as their leader. The eloquent and universally popular

Beranger, advocating in all his glowing verse the rights of the

people, with other agents of the Orleans cause, repaired to this

democratic gathering, to win them over, if possible, to their side.

Angrily the Democrats rejected all such propositions. A ferocious

debate ensued, which was terminated by a pistol-shot from an enraged

opponent, which wounded an Orleanist orator severely in the cheek. It

was no longer safe, in that presence, to urge the claims of Louis

Philippe. His advocates, as speedily as possible, left the hall.

The Democrats, as this wing of the Republican party may be called,

who had broken from their more moderate brethren, who were assembled,

under the presidency of Lafayette, at the Hotel de Ville, thus left

to themselves, sent a deputation to that body, with the following

well-expressed remonstrance against organizing a government without

consulting the voice of the French people:

"The people yesterday reconquered their rights at the expense

of their blood. The most precious of their rights is that of

choosing their form of government. Till this is done, no

proclamation should be issued announcing any form of

government as adopted. A provisional representation of the

nation exists: let it continue till the wishes of the

majority of Frenchmen are known."

The spacious Place de Greve, in front of the Hotel de Ville, was

crowded with an excited, surging, tumultuous mass, anxiously awaiting

the issues of each passing hour. The democratic delegation elbowed

their way through the crowd, and were courteously received by

Lafayette, in behalf of the Provisional Government. As Lafayette was

addressing them, a gentleman entered, M. Sussy, a commissioner from

the fugitive king, Charles X., with a proclamation which Charles had

issued, hoping to conciliate the enraged people by revoking the

ordinances which had roused them to insurrection, dismissing the

obnoxious ministers who had recommended those ordinances, and

appointing a new cabinet of more popular men.

It was too late for compromise. The same proclamation had been sent

to the deputies, but they refused to receive it. Upon the

announcement of the mission of M. Sussy, the indignant cry arose from

the Republicans, "No! no! away with him: we will have nothing more to

do with the Bourbons." So great was the fury excited that it was with

difficulty that a brawny Republican, M. Bastide, was prevented from

throwing M. Sussy out of the window. By the interposition of

Lafayette, he was withdrawn, in the midst of a frightful tumult, to

another room. Under the influence of the hostile feelings thus

aroused, a series of resolutions were passed, declaring that France

would have no more of royalty--that the representatives of the people

alone should make the laws, to be executed only by a temporary

president.

It will be seen that these resolutions were in direct opposition to

the views of those who wished to re-erect the monarchy and to place

Louis Philippe upon the throne. But these resolutions were

passionately adopted, by the most radical portion of the party, in

the midst of a scene of the wildest tumult. They were by no means

unanimously accepted. The more moderate of the Republicans, with

Lafayette at their head, in view of the agitation hourly augmenting

in the streets, in view of the insuperable difficulties, obvious to

every well-informed man, of establishing a stable Republic in a realm

where a large majority of the population were opposed to a Republic,

and trembling in view of the anarchy with which all France was

menaced, and conscious that a Republic would excite the hostility of

every surrounding throne--were already strongly inclined to effect a

union with the Orleans party, under a constitutional monarchy.

In various parts of the city there were excited gatherings, adopting

all sorts of revolutionary resolutions, and sending delegations to

the Hotel de Ville with instructions, petitions, and threats. The

students of the Polytechnic School--who had distinguished themselves

in the bloodiest scenes of the street-fight with the troops of

Charles X.--sent a committee to the Hotel de Ville with a military

_order_, to which they _demanded_ an official signature. The

appropriate officer, M. Lobau, refused to sign it. "You recoil, do

you?" said the determined young man who presented the ordinance.

"Nothing is so dangerous, in revolutions, as to recoil: I will order

you to be shot!"

"To be shot!" was the indignant reply. "Shoot a member of the

Provisional Government!"

The young man drew him to the window, pointed to a well-armed band of

a hundred men, who had fought desperately the day before: "There,"

said he, "are men who would shoot God Almighty, were I to order them

to do so." The order was signed in silence.

Such occurrences gave new impulse to the inclinations of Lafayette

and the more moderate of the Republican party towards the Orleanists,

who were deliberating in the salons of M. Lafitte. Charles X., who

had fled from St. Cloud with his family and with some of the most

devoted of his followers, while these scenes were transpiring, was

still in France, at but a few leagues from Paris, at the head of

twelve thousand veteran troops. Should the Duke of Orleans escape and

join him, and rally the rural portion of the people in defense of

Legitimacy, and in support of the Duke of Bordeaux, results might

ensue appalling to the boldest imagination. As hour after hour passed

away, and the duke did not appear in Paris, the anxiety in the

crowded salons of M. Lafitte was terrible. Orleanists and Republicans

were alike imperilled. The re-establishment of the old regime would

inevitably consign the leaders of both these parties, as traitors, to

the scaffold. Democratic cries were resounding, more and more loudly,

through the streets. Power was fast passing into the hands of the

mob. Should the Duke of Orleans fail his party, there was no one else

around whom they could rally, and their disastrous defeat was

inevitable.

The hours were fast darkening into despair. Messengers were anxiously

sent to the Palais Royal, the sumptuous city residence of the duke,

to ascertain if he had arrived. No tidings could be heard from him.

The domestics seemed to be packing up the valuables in preparation

for removal. The utter failure of Beranger and his associates to gain

the co-operation of the Democrats was reported. The decisive

resolution adopted at the Hotel de Ville was known. All seemed lost.

There was nothing before the eye but a frightful vision of anarchy

and bloodshed. A general panic seized all those assembled in the

apartments of Lafitte, and there was a sudden dispersion. It was near

midnight; but three persons were left--Lafitte, Adolphe Thibodeaux,

and Benjamin Constant. A few moments of anxious conversation ensued.

"What will become of us to-morrow?" sadly inquired Lafitte.

"We shall all be hanged," replied Benjamin Constant, in the calm

aspect of despair.

In this crisis of affairs, matters threatened to become still more

involved by two energetic young men, M. Ladvocat and M. Dumoulin, who

proposed to bring forward the claims of the Empire. The name of

Napoleon then pronounced in the streets, and the unfurling of the

eagle-crowned banner under any recognized representative of his

renown, would, perhaps, have called a party into being which would

instantly have overridden all others. This peril was adroitly averted

by the sagacity of M. Thiers and M. Mignet. By their powerful

persuasion they induced M. Ladvocat to desist from the attempt The

other young man, who was found inflexible in his resolve, they lured

into a room in the Hotel de Ville, where they caused him to be

arrested and imprisoned.

In the following terms Louis Blanc describes this singular event:

"While every one was seeking to realize his wishes, a few

voices only were heard uttering the name of the emperor in a

city that had so long echoed to that sound. Two men without

influence, military reputation, or celebrity of any kind, MM.

Ladvocat and Dumoulin, conceived, for a while, the idea of

proclaiming the Empire. M. Thiers easily persuaded one of

them that fortune gives herself to him who hastens to seize

her. The other appeared, dressed as an orderly-officer, in

the great hall of the Hotel de Ville. But, being politely

requested by M. Carbonel to pass into an adjoining room, he

was there locked up and kept prisoner.

"This is one of those curiosities of history the key of which

is found in the grovelling nature of most human ambition. The

son of Napoleon was far away. For those who were actuated by

vulgar hopes, to wait was to run the risk of losing those

first favors which are always easiest to obtain from a

government that has need to win forgiveness for its

accession. Nevertheless, Napoleon's memory lived in the

hearts of the people. But what was requisite to the crowning

of the immortal victim of Waterloo in the first-born of his

race?--That an old general should appear in the streets, draw

his sword, and shout, _Vive Napoleon II!_

"But no; General Gourgaud alone made some tentative efforts.

Napoleon, besides, had pigmied all minds round his own. The

imperial regime had kindled in the plebeians he had abruptly

ennobled a burning thirst for place and distinction. The

Orleanist party recruited itself among all those whose

promptitude to revive the Empire needed, perhaps, but one

flash of hardihood, a leader, and a cry. Of all the generals

whose fortunes were of imperial growth, Subervic alone gave

his voice for a Republic in M. Lafitte's saloons--at least he

was the only one that was remarked. Thus all was over as

regards Napoleon. And some little time after this, a young

colonel, in the service of Austria, died beyond the

Rhine--the frail representative of a dynasty whose last

breath passed away with him."[X]

[Footnote X: "The History of Ten Years," by Louis Blanc, vol. i, p.

187.]

When Louis Blanc penned these lines he little supposed that but a few

years would pass away ere the almost unanimous voice of the French

people would call Napoleon III. to the throne of France, and that

under his energetic sway France would enjoy for twenty years

prosperity at home and influence abroad which almost eclipsed the

splendors of the first Empire.

In the mean time an agitated crowd poured out through the gates of

Paris, and, invading Neuilly, surrounded the chateau, intending to

seize the Duke of Orleans and carry him into the city. But he, as we

have mentioned, had retired to Rancy. The leaders of this multitude,

professing to be a deputation from the Chamber of Deputies, demanded

to see the duchess, and informed her that they should take her and

her children as hostages to the city, and there keep them until the

duke should appear in Paris. The duchess, terrified in view of the

peril to which she and her children would be exposed in the hands of

an ungovernable mob, wrote to her husband entreating him to return

immediately.

Thus influenced, the duke resolved to repair to Paris. The streets

were thronged with an excited mob, who would surely assassinate him

should he be recognized. The peril of his family overcame his

constitutional timidity. In disguise, accompanied by three persons

only, who were also disguised, this reluctant candidate for one of

the most brilliant of earthly crowns, a little before midnight, set

out on foot from his rural retreat; and, entering Paris, traversed

the thronged streets, with Republican cries resounding everywhere

about him. In several instances the mob, little aware whom they were

assailing, compelled him to respond to the cry. Upon reaching his

sumptuous palace, sometime after midnight, he threw himself, in utter

exhaustion, upon a couch, and sent the welcome announcement to his

friends of his arrival. M. de Montmart, one of the most prominent of

the Orleans party, immediately called. He found the duke in a state

of extreme agitation, bathed in sweat, undressed, and covered only

with a light spread.

The duke gave vehement utterance to his perplexities and alarm. He

declared his devotion to the principles of Legitimacy, and his

inalienable attachment to his friends and relatives of the elder

branch of the Bourbon family. He remonstrated against the cruelty of

placing him in the false position of their antagonist, saying, "I

would rather die than accept the crown." Seizing a pen, he wrote a

letter to Charles X., full of protestations of loyalty and homage. M.

de Montmart concealed this epistle in the folds of his cravat, and it

was conveyed to the fugitive king.

This epistle was probably intended only to be a forcible expression

of the extreme reluctance with which Louis Philippe yielded to those

influences which seemed morally to compel him to accept the crown.

Charles X. was cruelly deceived by the letter. He interpreted it to

signify that the Duke of Orleans would remain firm in his allegiance

to the dynasty which had been driven by successful insurrection from

Paris.

[Illustration: THE PALAIS ROYAL.]

At an early hour the next morning, a delegation from the Chamber of

Deputies, with General Sebastiani at its head, arrived at the Palais

Royal. The agitations of the hour were such that, without waiting for

an announcement, they broke into the presence of the duke with the

entreaty that he would accept from them the lieutenant-generalcy of

the kingdom, which was merely the stepping-stone to the throne. The

duke was still very undecided, or, to save appearances, feigned to be

so. The deputies assured him that the crisis was so imperious, that

not only the destinies of France, but also his own life, were

probably dependent upon his accepting the appointment. The duke

implored a few more moments for private reflection, and retired to

his cabinet with General Sebastiani, who was then hurriedly

dispatched to the hotel of M. Talleyrand in the Rue St. Florentin.

Talleyrand had been one of the firmest supporters of Legitimacy.

Louis Philippe sought his advice. The wily statesman, who had lived

through so many revolutions, had not yet left his bed-chamber, and

was dressing. He, however, promptly returned the sealed answer, "Let

him accept."

The duke hesitated no longer. Returning to the Deputies, he announced

his decision. The most vigorous action was now required. A

proclamation to the inhabitants of Paris was immediately drawn up in

the name of Louis Philippe, and which was unanimously agreed to by

the delegation, announcing that, in obedience to the wishes of the

Deputies, he had assumed the office of lieutenant-general of France.

At the same time, the illustrious writer, M. Guizot, was intrusted

with the duty of preparing a more full exposition of the principles

of the Orleanist party, which was to be signed by ninety-one of the

Deputies. The proclamation issued by Louis Philippe, and which was

simply expanded in the longer one drawn up by M. Guizot, was as

follows:

"INHABITANTS OF PARIS,--The Deputies, at this moment

assembled in Paris, have expressed their desire that I

should betake myself to this capital to exercise there the

functions of lieutenant-general of the kingdom. I have not

hesitated to come and partake of your dangers, to place

myself in the midst of this heroic population, and use all

my endeavors to preserve you from civil war and anarchy. On

entering the city of Paris, I wore with pride those glorious

colors you have resumed, and which I had myself long

carried.

"The Chambers are about to assemble. They will consult on

the means of securing the reign of the laws and the

maintenance of the rights of the nation. A charter shall be

henceforth a true thing.

"LOUIS PHILIPPE D'ORLEANS."

Louis Philippe Makers of History Series · 第 8 / 12 章