THE CHAUTAUQUA PLAN.

The eleventh Assembly has wrought its work, and it is safe to say no

Assembly ever made more converts to the Chautauqua Plan. Among the

number, too, were many of the best thinkers and ablest educators in the

country. Many left Chautauqua this summer convinced of the possibilities

in the work, and resolved to spread its influence. One of these, the Rev.

Dr. A. A. Livermore, president of the Unitarian Theological School at

Meadville, Pa., a man widely known as a ripe scholar, has published an

article analyzing the Chautauqua plan. This article explains most clearly

the strong features of the work. After describing the enthusiastic

Commencement the writer says of the C. L. S. C.: “College education,

as it has been hitherto carried on, has been largely a forced concern;

students have been sent to school, rather than gone on their free and

spontaneous will. The pupils of Chautauqua are voluntary agents, and

engage in their work with a will. It is the difference between task

work and love work. Almost all schools and colleges are handicapped by

the compulsion necessary to bring their pupils up to the mark. But here

all goes like clock work. There is a vim and abandon which argue the

best results. Not knowledge, but the love of knowledge, is the best of

accomplishments, and that is breathed into the Chautauquan graduates.

“The _religious element_ is made a leading principle in the Chautauqua

education, and it is the true one. Intellect for intellect, taste for

taste, study for study, lacks the genuine inspiration, but put on the

annex of religious faith in God, Christ and immortality, and you have got

an effective leverage to raise the whole nature of man. The Chautauqua

Idea is not so much to make specialists; as for example, engineers,

editors, ministers, doctors, lawyers, but well instructed men and women.

Human nature is a diamond in the rough, and it is worth polishing and

setting for its own sake. God having bestowed such a magnificent treasure

on man, he is guilty who does not put it to its intended purpose, and

return it to its author improved and developed to its best extent.

“Another fine idea of the Chautauqua University is to _educate people at

their homes_. Massing students together in great monastic institutions

is dangerous business. Humanity heats and moulds and corrupts when

put into crowded institutions, be they prisons or colleges. Some of

the worst disorders perpetrated in society take place in schools and

universities where young people are herded together in great numbers with

the restraints of home and society largely thrown off. This scheme is

to carry on the work at the fireside, on the farm, at the shop, by the

work bench. Carry education to the people, instead of carrying the people

to education. And still further it is the idea not to take people from

their usual occupations after they are educated, not to take farmers,

mechanics, housewives from their present callings and put them in the

learned professions, but to leave them still where they are, and start

them on a course of mental and moral improvement which they can conduct

all their lifetime at their homes, and while still engaged in their

several industries. This is a capital merit of the system, and deserves

especial commendation.

“So planned and so engineered, Chautauqua is the university of _the

common people_, of the great middle class that constitute the strength

and glory of every country, and especially of ours. Its numbers are

prodigious, its extent is world wide. It sets a splendid example for all

nations. It strikes the keynote for the education eventually of the whole

human race. In our land it is destined to do more for the perpetuation of

our free institutions than many another time-honored school or college

that limits its benefits to some privileged class, sex, color or section.

Chautauqua blows a trumpet to every quarter of the compass, and says to

all, ‘Come ye and buy wine and milk without money and without price.’”

The Chautauquan, Vol. 05, October 1884, No. 1 · 第 152 / 208 题