I.—THE GREEK TOWN AND HOUSE.

Whereas modern life is very much a country life, and we see all our

plains and hills studded with farmsteads and well kept houses, it was

seldom so with ancient, as it is never so with modern, Greece. In old

days the fear of pirates and plunderers, in later days the taste for

talking and for politics, kept men from staying in the country, and

brought them into the towns, where they found safety and society. The

tyrants alone insisted upon country life. Thus we find in Homer that

outlying farms belonging to the nobles were managed by trusty slaves,

who grazed cattle, and stall-fed them for city use. In Hesiod’s time

it was the poor farmer only who dwelt in the country; fashionable and

idle people always came together in the towns. The very same facts meet

us when we read the Greek novels of the latest age, such as the _Story

of Daphnis and Chloe_. There the rich citizens of Mitylene only come

out rarely, like many Irish landlords, to visit their tenants and their

flocks. There are only two large instances of Greek gentry living from

choice in the country. The first is that of the old Attic gentry, whom

Thucydides and Aristophanes describe as living luxuriously on their

estates, and coming seldom to Athens. The second is that of the gentry of

Elis, who were often, Polybius says, complete strangers for generations

to the town. This was so because Attica was protected by her forts and

fleets from sudden attack in these early days, and because the Greeks by

common consent respected the land of Elis as sacred on account of the

Olympic games. Accordingly, Xenophon, who was a sportsman, settled in

this country when he retired from his wars. But we must pay our chief

attention to city life as the almost universal form of Greek society.

The older Greek towns were usually some miles from the sea, because

many pirates went about the coasts. These towns grew out from a castle,

or _Acropolis_, which at first had been the only fortified refuge for

the neighboring people in times of danger. Of this we have a remarkable

example in the very old ruins of Tiryns on the plain of Argos. When the

population increased, they built their towns round this fort, and walled

them in. But the Acropolis or hill fort, generally on some steep crag,

was of course the strongest and safest part of the town. It was also the

seat of the oldest temples, and of the god who took the town under his

special charge. Hence it was often a sacred place altogether, and not

occupied with common houses. If the town prospered, there grew up at the

nearest harbor a roadstead or seaport town, where merchants and sailors

carried on their trade. Thus Athens with its Acropolis is three miles

from the nearest sea, and more than four miles from the Peiræus, which

became its port because the harbor was so excellent. The same may be said

of Argos, Megara, and other towns. Thus Corinth had even two ports, one

on either sea, and both at some miles distance from the great rock on

which its citadel, the Acrocorinthus, was situate. Sparta alone had no

citadel, because the passes into its plain were very difficult and easily

defended. It had not even walls, but looked like a few mean villages

close together. This was a remarkable exception.

The citadel was defended by walls, wherever the natural rock was not

steep enough, and supplied with tanks for water, except in such rare

cases as that of Corinth which has a rich fountain on the top of its

great rock. If you looked down from any of these great citadels upon

the town beneath, the most striking objects were always the temples

and other public buildings which were meant to be admired from without,

whereas the private houses were externally poor and shabby. So also the

public squares and markets were large and imposing, often surrounded

by colonnades and porticoes where people lay in the sun, or even slept

at night. These colonnades were adorned with rows of statues; but the

streets were narrow and dirty. The great contrast to any modern city

must have been first of all the absence of all spires and pinnacles, as

all Greek architecture loved flat roofs, and never built even in many

stories. Then the forest of modern chimneys was also absent—an advantage

which may be held fully to make up for the absence of even splendid

steeples. All private houses were flat and insignificant, for the Greek

never intended his house to be admired from without, he merely meant to

shut out the noise and the thoroughfare of the street, and spent all his

care on inner comforts.

While we build our houses facing the street, with most of their ornament

intended to be seen by those who pass by, the Greek did all he could to

shut out completely all connection with the street. He never had ground

floor windows facing the street, and his house looked like a dead wall

with a strong door in it, furnished with a knocker and a handle. This

door opened outward, which made it safer for those within, but when

they were coming out they used to knock inside lest passers-by might be

thrown down when the door was pushed open. Richer houses did not open

directly on the street, but on a porch which was not regarded as part

of the house. Directly inside the hall door was a narrow hall with a

porter’s lodge opening off it, in which a slave sat, who was put to that

work or to that of attending boys, when not useful for anything else. You

passed through the hall or passage into an open square court, which was

the center of the house, and was surrounded by a covered colonnade or

cloister. The various men’s rooms and the dining room opened upon this

cloister. The same general plan was adopted by the Romans, and inherited

by the modern Italians, so that most Italian palaces in Genoa, Florence,

and elsewhere are built in this way. Opposite the entrance was a second

door, which led from the court into the women’s apartments, and here

was situated the bed chamber of the master and mistress of the house.

In richer houses the women’s rooms were built round a second court like

the first. But more commonly they did not occupy so much room, and were

often placed on a second story, raised over the first at the back part

of the building, with a staircase going up from the court. The Greeks

preferred living on the ground floor, and their houses were not lofty

blocks, like those of our streets. The bed rooms and sitting rooms round

the court were usually small and dark, being mostly lighted only through

their door into the cloister. The upper story had windows. The roof,

which was tiled, like ours, was so flat as to allow people to walk upon

it. The pantries and store rooms were generally at the back of the house,

and near them the kitchen, which alone was supplied with a chimney.

The other rooms seldom required a fire, and, if necessary, were heated

with braziers of hot coke, or charcoal. The covered way upon which they

opened made them cool in summer. Of course the palaces of early kings

and the country houses of the rich Attic nobles had larger rooms and

courtyards than ordinary city houses, but their plan was not different.

Homer describes their halls as ornamented by plates of bright metal on

the walls—a fashion preserved in the house of Phocion at Athens, and of

which we still have traces in the so-called treasure house of Atreus,

near Mycenæ. Fresco painting and rich coloring on the walls did not come

into fashion till the fourth century B. C., and then became so common

that we find almost all the houses in Pompeii, which was really a Greek

town, though in Italy, ornamented in this way. There are large panels of

black, scarlet, or yellow, surrounded with the borders of flowers, and in

the center of the panel there are figures painted, when the owner could

afford it. The same style of ornament, with far better execution, may be

seen in the chambers of the palace now excavated on the Palatine at Rome.

As the Greek citizen lived chiefly in the open air, and in public, and

regarded his house merely as a safe and convenient place to keep his

family and store his goods, it was not to be expected that his furniture

should be expensive or elaborate. The small size of the rooms and the

dislike of the Greeks for large entertainments also tended to the same

economy. Besides, the low valuations of furniture alluded to in several

speeches made in the law courts of Athens prove it clearly as a general

rule in earlier days, though some cities, such as the rich Sybaris, may

have formed exceptions. In later days, with the decay of public spirit,

greater luxury prevailed in private life.

We must therefore consider early Greek household furniture to have been

cheap and simple, but remarkable for a grace of design and beauty of

form which have never since been rivalled. And these were combined with

a diligent attention to comfort and to practical use. Thus the Greek

chair which is often drawn on vases, and which is reproduced in marble

in the front row of the theater at Athens, as we still see it, is the

most comfortable and practical chair yet designed. So also the pots and

pitchers and vases which have been discovered in endless variety, are

equally beautiful and convenient. The chief articles of which we hear

are chairs, stools and couches made in ornamental wood work, with loose

cushions (unlike our modern upholstery); there were also high-backed

arm-chairs, and folding stools often carried after their masters by

slaves. Though men of ruder ages and poorer classes were content to sleep

between rugs and skins on the ground, and a shake down for a sudden guest

was always such (and is so still); yet the Greeks had beds of woolen

mattresses stretched on girths. Tables were only used for eating, and

were then brought in, and laid loosely upon their legs. In early days

each guest had a separate table for himself. This absence of solid tables

must have been the most marked contrast between a Greek room and ours.

People wrote either on their knees (as they now do in the East) or upon

the arm of a couch. Whatever ornaments they kept in their rooms seem

to have been placed on tripods, which often carried a vase of precious

metal and of elegant workmanship. The wonderful variety and beauty of

their lamps must also have been a remarkable feature. They possessed all

manner of cups, bowls, jars, and flasks for wine, and water, and oil,

and we have long lists of names for kitchen utensils, probably not very

different from those found at Pompeii. They used plates and dishes, and

sometimes knives and spoons at meals, but never forks.

The Chautauquan, Vol. 05, October 1884, No. 1 · 第 44 / 208 题