DEMOGRAPHY

Estimates of population for the southern New England area are

variable. The most widely quoted figure is that arrived at by

Mooney—25,000 for the entire New England area, prior to the 1616-17

plague.[5] Other writers place the number at around 20,000 for

southern New England alone.[6] In all likelihood, the lower number

is the more nearly correct. Population estimates made by visitors to

the New England area in the 16th and 17th centuries were based in the

main upon what could be observed in the course of a coastwide voyage.

And while Indian population appeared dense, the actual situation was

one of a considerably concentrated population along the immediate

coast, where rich marine resources were available, and a very sparse,

often seasonal, occupation of vast tracts further inland.[7]

By the time the Pilgrims arrived, the population of eastern

Massachusetts had declined greatly, as a result of the epidemic

which we have mentioned before. No one really knows what the disease

was that took such great numbers of Indians. The Massachusetts

were virtually destroyed—first by the plague and then by wars with

the Abnaki during the early decades of the seventeenth century.

Population declined from perhaps three thousand to a mere five

hundred between the years 1615 and 1630.[8] The Wampanoags had

suffered less, but the effects of the plague were still felt heavily

by them. Prior to the plague their numbers are estimated to have

been two to three thousand, but death depopulated large tracts of

land.[9] Altham writes that the nearest Indian town to Plymouth was

fourteen miles away.[10] Gookin called them, “a potent nation in

former times....”[11] In 1620 they numbered perhaps something over

one thousand.[12] The Narragansetts, however, were untouched by the

plague; they are said to have numbered some four thousand.[13]

The general result of the settlement of Europeans in New England was

to further the trend of Indian depopulation. Whereas the Europeans

might hope to have developed or inherited a degree of immunity to

the diseases which they carried, such infections proved fatal to

the Indians almost without exception. In 1632-33 the Narragansetts

suffered a smallpox epidemic which killed some seven hundred, and

at the same time it destroyed what remained of the Massachusetts

tribe.[14] The well-meaning attempts of missionaries to Christianize

the Indians by civilizing them and putting them into European clothes

and houses also brought changes to the detriment of their general

health. The “civilized” custom of washing, for example, removed the

coating of animal fat that the Indian customarily wore to protect

himself from cold and insects and exposed his body to previously

unknown physiological shocks. Wars of the colonial period also took

their toll of the Indian population.

As far as can be told from available information, the density of

population in New England just prior to European colonization was .22

Indians per square mile.[15]

The Wampanoags in the seventeenth century · 第 11 / 73 题