THE TAMARIND-TREE.

Everybody knows the agreeable tamarind preserve we receive from the

West Indies; everybody has occasionally produced by its aid a cooling

and welcome beverage; and everybody (at least in Scotland) has

conferred, by its means, upon the insipid gruel recommended for a cold

a finely-acidulated taste. Everybody likewise knows that the tamarind

is pretty largely employed in our Materia Medica, and that its effect,

when eaten uncompounded, is gently aperient: but for all that, very few

persons are acquainted with certain curious particulars connected with

the tree which produces this popular fruit.

The tamarind-tree is one of the _fabaceæ_, or order of leguminous

plants; 'an order,' says Lindley, 'not only among the most extensive

that are known, but also one of the most important to man, whether

we consider the beauty of the numerous species, which are among the

gayest-coloured and most graceful plants of every region, or their

applicability to a thousand useful purposes.' To give an idea of the

wide extension of this order, we may say that it includes the acacia,

the logwood and rosewood of commerce; the laburnum, the furze, and the

broom; the bean, pea, vetch, clover, trefoil, indigo, gum-arabic, and

other gums and drugs. There are two species of tamarinds--the East

and the West Indian--exhibiting some considerable difference, more

especially in the pods, which are much shorter in the latter species,

and the pulp less rich and plentiful. In the West Indies, the shell is

removed, and the legume preserved, by being placed in jars intermixed

with layers of sugar; or else the vessel is filled up with boiling

sugar, which penetrates to the bottom. The Turks and Arabs use this

fruit, prepared either with sugar or honey, as an article of food; and

for its cooling properties it is a favourite in journeys in the desert.

In Nubia it is formed into cakes, baked in the sun; and these are

afterwards used in producing a cooling drink. In India, likewise, it is

used both as food and drink; but there it is never treated with sugar,

but merely dried in the sun. When eaten as food, it is toasted, soaked

in water, and then boiled, till the taste, it is said, resembles that

of the common bean.

In India the tamarind-tree is a very beautiful object, its spreading

branches flinging even with their tiny leaves an extensive shade. In

one season its pretty straw-coloured flowers refresh the eye; and in

another its long brown pods, which are shed plentifully, afford a more

substantial refreshment to the traveller. The Hindoos, however, prize

it chiefly as a material for cleaning their brass vessels, although

they likewise use it as a condiment for their curries and other dishes,

and likewise make it into pickles and preserves. For the last-mentioned

purpose a red variety is the most esteemed, both the timber and the

fruit being of a sanguine hue. The tamarind, however, is chiefly

planted by the roadside, or on the rising banks of a tank; and in the

lower parts of Bengal, where it grows in the natural forests of the

Sunderbunds, it is the most common kind of firewood, being never used

for any more dignified purpose. The native never chooses this beautiful

tree, as he does the palm, the neem, or the mourungosh, to overshadow

his hut; and it is never admitted into the mango groves sacred to the

gods, although the silk-cotton and the mouwha are not forbidden that

consecrated ground.

But the prejudice goes further still. No _khitmutgar_, or cook, will

hang a piece of meat on a tamarind-tree: he believes that meat thus

exposed does not keep well, and that it becomes unfit for salting. A

traveller, though very willing to eat of the fruit, will not unload

his pack or rest under its branches; and a soldier, tired as he may be

with a long march, will rather wander farther on than pile his arms in

its shade. There is an idea, in fact, at least in Bengal, that there

is something unlucky or unhealthy, some antique spell or some noxious

vapour, surrounding this beautiful tree; although we are not aware that

science has yet discovered that there is anything really hurtful in its

exhalations.

Another strange notion connected with the tamarind-tree is thus

mentioned by a correspondent:--'Often have I stood as a youngster

gazing with astonishment at a couple of bearers belabouring a large

knotty root, of some eight feet in girth, with their axes, making the

chips fly off in every direction; which, upon picking up, I used to

find covered over with unintelligible scribbles, which the bearers

gravely told me was the writing of the gods.'

Here we have our tree in a new light: this outcast from the sacred

groves is inscribed with holy characters! Who shall interpret their

meaning? Are they like the mark set upon the forehead of Cain? Or is

the legend intended as a perpetual consolation under the prejudices and

indignities of men? All we know is, that the white fir-like grains of

the tamarind wood are written over in an unknown tongue by means of a

small thread-like vein of a black colour.

There is a similar superstition connected with another Indian tree, the

kulpa briksha, or silver-tree, so called from the colour of the bark.

The original kulpa, which now stands in the garden of the god Indra in

the first heaven, is said to have been one of the fourteen remarkable

things turned up by the churning of the ocean by the gods and demons.

But however this may be, the name of Ram and his consort Seeta is

written upon the silvery trunks of all its earthly descendants! Colonel

Sleeman, when travelling in Upper India, had the curiosity to examine

many of these trees on both sides of the road; and sure enough the name

of the incarnation of Vishnu mentioned was plainly enough discernible,

written in Sanscrit characters, and apparently by some supernatural

hand--'that is, there was a softness in the impression, as if the

finger of some supernatural being had traced the characters.' The

traveller endeavoured to argue his attendants out of their senses; but

unluckily he could find no tree, however near or distant, without the

names; the only difference being in the size of the letters, which in

some cases were large, and in others small. At length he observed a

kulpa in a hollow below the road, and one on a precipice above, both in

situations accessible with such difficulty, that he was sure no mortal

scribe would take the trouble to get at them. He declared confidently

his opinion that the names would not be found on these trees, and it

was proved that he was right. But this was far from affecting the

devout faith of his Hindoo followers. 'Doubtless,' said one, 'they have

in some way or other got rubbed off; but God will renew them in His

own time.' 'Perhaps,' remarked another, 'he may not have thought it

necessary to write at all upon places where no traveller could decipher

them.' 'But do you not see,' said the traveller, losing patience,

'that these names are all on the trunk within reach of a man's hand?'

'Of course they are,' replied they, 'since the miracle could not be

distinguished by the eyes of men if they were written higher up!'

A shrub called the trolsee is a representation of the same goddess

Seeta, and is every year _married_ with great ceremony to a sacred

stone called Saligram, a rounded pebble supposed to represent the good

Vishnu, of whom Ram was an incarnation. On one occasion described, the

procession attending this august ceremony consisted of 8 elephants,

1200 camels, and 4000 horses, all mounted and elegantly caparisoned.

Above 100,000 persons were present at this pageant, at which the little

pebble was mounted on the leading elephant, and thus carried in state

to his tree goddess. All the ceremonies of a Hindoo marriage were gone

through, and then the god and goddess were left to repose together till

the next season in the temple of Sudora.

Indian trees, however, it must be said, are, from all accounts, much

more worthy of the honours of superstition than those of less fervid

climes. A traveller mentions an instance of the 'sentient principle'

occurring among the denizens of an Indian forest. Two trees, he tells

us, of different kinds, although only three feet apart, had grown to

the height of fifty or sixty feet, when one of them took the liberty of

throwing out a low branch in such a way as to touch the trunk of his

neighbour, and thus occasion much pain and irritation. 'On this the

afflicted tree in turn threw out a huge excrescence, which not only

enveloped the offending branch, but strangled it so completely as to

destroy it utterly; the ends of the deadened boughs projecting three

or four feet beyond the excrescence, while the latter was carried on a

distance of three feet across to the shaft of the tree, so as to render

all chances of its future movement wholly impossible!' This appears to

our traveller to display as much forethought and sagacity as taking up

an artery for aneurism, or tying splints round a broken bone.

But in a country where trees are the objects of such veneration,

and where those that are neither holy nor sagacious are admitted

without scruple to the best arborical society, how comes it that the

beautiful, the umbrageous, and the beneficent tamarind is looked upon

as the outlaw of the plantation, the pariah of the forest? This is a

very puzzling circumstance, and one that, in the present state of our

knowledge, we can only set down to the caprice and ingratitude of man.

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 309 New Series, Saturday, December 8, 1849 · 第 8 / 20 题